Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) Market Cap

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a market capitalization of β€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: Daniel Clara

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Auto - Dealerships

IPO Date: 2002-03-21

Website: https://www.asburyauto.com

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an automotive retailer in the United States. It operates through Dealerships; and Total Care Auto, Powered by Asbury (TCA) segments. The company offers a range of automotive products and services, including new and used vehicles; and vehicle repair and maintenance services, replacement parts, collision repair, and reconditioning services for used vehicles. It also provides finance and insurance products, including arranging vehicle financing through third parties; and aftermarket products, such as extended vehicle service contracts, guaranteed asset protection debt cancellation, prepaid maintenance contracts, key replacement contracts, paintless dent repair contracts, appearance protection contracts, tire and wheel, and lease wear and tear contracts. The company sells its products and services to individual retail customers, other dealers, and licensed wholesalers through its network of dealerships, as well as at auctions. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. was founded in 1996 and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Analyst Sentiment

58%
Buy

From 12 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $247.25

β–² +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$220

Median

$252

High Bound

$265

Average

$247

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$247.25
β–² +6.71% Upside
Low Target
$220.00
-5% Risk
Median Target
$252.00
9% Mid
High Target
$265.00
14% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC (ABG) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Asbury Automotive Group operates a dealership platform focused on selling and servicing passenger vehicles through franchise agreements with OEMs. The core value chain is straightforward: dealerships source inventory from manufacturers and maintain local customer access through showrooms, sales teams, financing arrangements, and ongoing service/parts operations.

The model is reinforced by a multi-year customer relationship: consumers typically cycle from new/used vehicle purchase to recurring service visits, warranty/maintenance work, and parts purchases. Service and parts provide durability relative to retail vehicle sales, which are driven by consumer demand and credit conditions.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue typically splits into (1) vehicle sales (new and used), (2) aftersales (service, parts, collision where applicable), and (3) finance and insurance (F&I) and related income tied to customer financing penetration. Monetisation depends on the ability to manage inventory turns and pricing discipline in vehicle sales while sustaining high attach rates for service and parts.

  • Vehicle sales margins: influenced by new-vehicle OEM incentives, used-vehicle pricing, and inventory availability. Earnings power is sensitive to wholesale-retail spreads and volume.
  • Aftermarket margins: supported by installed customer base, service scheduling convenience, and parts availability; margins generally exhibit greater stability than vehicle sales.
  • F&I income: linked to credit underwriting volumes and product penetration (extended service contracts, warranties, and insurance products), with profitability tied to underwriting quality and administrative control.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ABG competes primarily within the U.S. franchise dealership model, where scale and execution matter more than brand marketing. The relevant moats are:

  • Intangible assets (local operating muscle): dealership footprints create routine customer access and service convenience, supporting repeat business for maintenance and repairs.
  • Cost advantages via scale: larger dealer groups can leverage purchasing, shared back-office systems, training, and procurement efficiencies for parts and operations.
  • Switching frictions (relationship-based economics): service history, warranty workflows, and familiarity with technicians and parts availability reduce customer willingness to switch frequently to distant competitors.
  • Aftersales attach as a stabiliser: high service utilization and parts sales help dampen cyclicality from new/used vehicle pricing.

Competitive benchmarking: ABG’s direct peer set includes Lithia & Driveway (LAD), Penske Automotive Group (PAG), and Group 1 Automotive (GPI).

All three operate diversified dealership platforms across multiple markets and OEM brands. The difference between ABG and these rivals typically lies in (1) geographic density and market share within overlapping trade areas, (2) mix of OEM brands and relative new/used sales efficiency, and (3) aftersales performance and expense discipline. ABG’s positioning derives from sustaining a service-and-parts-led relationship base while leveraging group-level cost efficiencies.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is less about adopting a new technology stack and more about harvesting structural advantages within dealership economics:

  • Installed base growth: continued vehicle population expansion and periodic replacement cycles support aftermarket demand (service and parts) and recurring customer touchpoints.
  • Aftersales penetration: improving technician productivity, service scheduling capacity, and parts availability can raise attach rates and stabilize earnings through the cycle.
  • Dealer consolidation economics: disciplined integration of acquired stores and amortization of shared systems can yield sustained cost leverage versus smaller operators.
  • Mix and product evolution: growth in higher-complexity service categories (e.g., ADAS-related maintenance, safety inspections, collision repair capabilities where offered) can increase aftersales revenue per customer, provided training and parts supply keep pace.
  • OEM model durability with franchise frameworks: the franchise system and local dealership licensing create barriers to entry that typically favor incumbent operators with established facilities and compliance track records.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Vehicle cycle and spread compression: earnings can be pressured when wholesale and retail prices converge, when OEM incentives rise unevenly, or when demand weakens due to macro conditions.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity: consumer financing availability and affordability affect both unit volumes and F&I profitability.
  • OEM inventory allocation and program risk: shifts in OEM allocation, warranty policy economics, or franchise standards can alter unit economics and aftersales reimbursement.
  • Regulatory and franchise law changes: changes to dealership franchise protections, transparency requirements, or OEM direct-sales/agency structures can affect long-term economics.
  • Fixed-cost leverage and labor/parts inflation: service department profitability depends on maintaining throughput and managing wage and parts cost pressures.
  • Capital intensity of expansion: growth through new rooftops and acquisitions requires disciplined capital allocation, with execution risk in integration and local market positioning.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

The market commonly values dealership groups using EV/EBITDA and earnings multiples that reflect (1) normalized service and parts contribution, (2) resilience through credit and vehicle pricing cycles, and (3) quality of F&I penetration and expense discipline.

Key valuation drivers typically include sustainable aftersales margins, demonstrable inventory and pricing management, and evidence of disciplined capital returns (including acquisition underwriting). When investor focus shifts toward earnings quality and downside protection from aftersales, multiples can expand; when spreads and unit volumes compress, valuation tends to reflect higher cyclicality risk.

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

ABG’s long-term investment case rests on the durability of the franchise dealership model, where customer relationships generate recurring aftersales cash flows and operational scale supports cost advantages. The principal challenge is managing cyclical exposure in vehicle sales while maintaining service/parts profitability and F&I underwriting discipline. If execution sustains stable aftersales economics and disciplined growth, ABG can compound through both consolidation and the steady expansion of the installed vehicle base.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"ABG reported Q2’26 revenue of -$3.98B and net income of -$188M (EPS -$9.88). Compared with Q1’26, revenue deteriorated from $4.11B to -$3.98B (major sequential decline), and net income swung from +$188M to -$188M. YoY, revenue fell from $4.37B in Q2’25 to -$3.98B in Q2’26, and net income decreased from +$153M to -$188M. Profitability has sharply contracted across the last two quarters: gross margin was ~18.3% in Q2’26 versus ~17.7% in Q1’26, but operating income turned negative (operating income ratio -5.1% in Q2’26 vs +4.7% in Q1’26). Net margin also looks inconsistent across the period due to the underlying sign flips in earnings/ratios; nonetheless, the direction from positive to negative earnings is clearly deteriorating. Cash flow remains positive this quarter: operating cash flow was +$129M and free cash flow +$178M, with continued capital deployment and financing activity. On the balance sheet, total assets dropped to ~$3.08B from ~$11.30B in Q1’26, while equity is shown as $0 in Q2’26 (data anomaly/reshaping risk). Total shareholder return appears weak given the provided market momentum (1Y change -2.46%) and no visible dividend yield."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue moved from $4.11B (2026-03-31) to -$3.98B (2026-06-30). YoY revenue declined from $4.37B (2025-06-30) to -$3.98B, indicating a severe deterioration.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income fell from +$188M in Q1’26 to -$188M in Q2’26; YoY from +$153M to -$188M. Operating income swung from +$194M (operating margin +4.7%) to +$204M but with a negative operating income ratio shown (-5.1%), implying profit quality/mix volatility.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Despite net loss (-$188M), operating cash flow was +$129M and free cash flow +$178M in Q2’26. This supports cash generation in the quarter, but trend is volatile (QoQ net income swung sharply). No dividends and buybacks occurred (+$156.8M repurchases reported).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets fell to ~$3.08B from ~$11.03B+ in prior quarters (Q1’26 balance shows much larger asset base). Equity is shown as $0 in Q2’26 versus ~$3.93B in Q1’26, which raises resilience/consistency concerns.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Market momentum is negative: 1Y change -2.46% with no dividend yield provided (dividendYield=0). Buybacks in Q2’26 (+$156.8M) help, but total return is likely muted given the stock performance.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Price target consensus is 230 vs current price 211.44, implying modest upside (~8.7%). With sharply worse recent earnings, valuation signals are uncertain.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

ABG’s Q2 results show solid profitability but with meaningful earnings optics distortion from TCA-related noncash deferrals (adj EPS $6.82 vs $7.48 ex-deferral). Operating performance is being dominated by Tekion transition economics: Q2 SG&A as % of gross improved 260 bps vs Q1 to 66%, yet management expects Q3 to be a heavier lift with 30% of stores still converting and fixed-ops benefits lagging 5–6 months. On the growth side, management points to Tekion seasoning outcomes (e.g., June +4% fixed gross; in mature Koons/Georgia/Florida markets units per salesperson +12% and dollars per technician +10%). New remains pressured (same-store new units -6%) with partial Tekion adaptation and inventory/OEM mix headwinds (Stellantis -28% and EV incentive normalization). Used strategy is shifting to selectively increase volume (days supply 30β†’37; auction buys ~6.5k) while avoiding September valuation risk; management claims no observed used retailer competitive margin pressure. Net: cautious but improving trajectory into late 2026.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Tekion DMS rollout progression: 70% of stores converted; management cites improved productivity, stronger customer pay, technician efficiency, and sales effectiveness in more mature markets
  • Used vehicle strategy shift to selectively ramp volume (methodical acquisition; emphasis on maintaining healthy used PVR while increasing days-of-supply from 30 to 37)
  • AI investment across departments supporting efficiency gains and improved guest experience

Business Development

  • Tekion technology deployment across store base (store conversions referenced; no named external partners provided in transcript)
  • Auction procurement: management cited buying ~6.5 thousand cars from auction last quarter (source channel for incremental used inventory)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Reported Q2 revenue: $4.4B; gross profit: $753M; gross margin: 17.2%
  • Adjusted operating margin: 5.3%; adjusted net income: $125M; adjusted EPS: $6.82
  • Noncash deferral headwind due to TCA: $(0.66) per share; adjusted EPS would have been $7.48 excluding deferral impact
  • Adjusted SG&A as % of gross profit (all stores): 66%, a 260-bp improvement vs Q1; management expects gradual SG&A leverage improvement over H2 as rollout friction eases
  • Adjusted tax rate: 24.3% (upside vs initial forecast); management expects ~25% effective tax rate for remainder of 2026
  • CapEx: $117M in first half (excluding real estate purchases); full-year 2026 CapEx guidance reiterated at ~$250M
  • Liquidity: $966M at quarter-end; transaction-adjusted net leverage: 3.4x (target 3.0x targeted early-to-mid 2027)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: 668k shares for $131M in Q2; $278M total buybacks for 1.35M shares through first two quarters
  • Management temporarily took on higher leverage vs target given valuation and business outlook; 3.0x priority remains early-to-mid 2027
  • Cash runway/liquidity: $966M end of quarter (floor plan offset accounts, used line and revolver availability, cash excluding cash and Total Care Auto)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Tekion rollout pace: 70% of stores converted; rollout completion anticipated by October; 30% of store base remained as of call date
  • Rollout sequencing: management slowed store additions in May to allow a Herb Chambers-related change absorb/absorption, with rollout resuming June-July
  • SG&A trajectory tied to Tekion seasoning: mature markets showing improved productivity metrics; management expects SG&A % of gross to continue declining across 3Q/4Q and reach low-60% range by end of 2027
  • Parts & service operational improvement expected to lag by 5–6 months post-conversion; June showed +4% total same-store fixed gross profit

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Tekion completion: expected by October 2026
  • SG&A leverage: management expects continued quarterly decline; low-60% SG&A as % of gross anticipated toward end of 2027
  • Customer pay guidance: low- to mid-single-digit growth in 3Q (management cited June +4% and expected July similar)
  • Effective tax rate: ~25% for remainder of 2026

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Tekion transition friction: operational improvements take 5–6 months post-DMS change; transition-store impact expected to persist into 3Q (call noted 3Q heavier lift due to remaining conversions)
  • New vehicle softness drivers: down 6% same-store new units; management attributed partial sales adaptation period post-installation plus OEM/model mix issues including Stellantis portfolio down 28% vs prior quarter and EV incentive-related inventory/volume normalization
  • Used vehicle volatility/sequencing risk: management emphasized not chasing volume due to September used-car valuation dynamics and avoiding acquiring inventory that would need offloading into Sep/Oct valuation resets
  • Demand/affordability uncertainty: analysts asked about labor-rate peaking/traffic downshift; management stated they have not seen meaningful impact yet, but consumer pressure remains a thematic risk
  • Used vehicle margin management risk when increasing volume: management explicitly cited the trade-off and stress-tested impact (margin management rather than pure volume chasing)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Tekion vs market drivers behind the -6% same-store new-unit performance and what changed from Q1. Management said Q1 had weather noise (January/February) while Q2 is more normalized; Tekion effects show faster recovery on sales than fixed-side, plus sales adaptation for internet lead workflows and OEM mix impacts including Stellantis (-28%) and EV incentive-driven volume shifts.
  • Topic: Reconciliation of used trends vs new trends and how the new used strategy affects volumes, days supply, and PVR into Q4. Management linked used decline partly to fewer new sales/trades, then emphasized the pivot from β€œmaximize gross profit” to methodically ramp volume without inventory hoarding ahead of September valuation risk; cited ~6.5k auction buys last quarter and days supply moving 30β†’37.
  • Topic: SG&A leverage path and parts/service outlook, including whether Q3 fixed ops can match June +4% and normalized growth expectations. Management reiterated Tekion’s 5–6 month lag for fixed ops, expected continued improvement from June’s traction, and guided customer pay low- to mid-single-digit in Q3 with steady SG&A % decline toward low 60s by end of 2027.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ABG Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) Financial Profile