C3.ai, Inc.

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) Market Cap

C3.ai, Inc. has a market capitalization of $1.39B.

Price: $9.18

0.11 (1.21%)

Market Cap: 1.39B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Thomas Siebel

Sector: Technology

Industry: Information Technology Services

IPO Date: 2020-12-09

Website: https://www.C3.ai

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.39B|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

C3.ai, Inc. is a leading provider of enterprise artificial intelligence (AI) software solutions, serving a global clientele across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific region. Its core offerings include the C3 AI Application Platform, a robust environment for developing, deploying, and operating enterprise-scale AI applications. Complementing this platform are specialized tools such as C3 AI Ex Machina for preparing data for analysis, C3 AI CRM which is tailored for specific industry customer relationship management needs, and C3 AI Data Vision for insightful visualization and understanding of complex data relationships. Furthermore, C3.ai delivers a comprehensive portfolio of pre-built, industry-specific AI applications designed to tackle critical business challenges. These include solutions for optimizing inventory levels (C3 AI Inventory Optimization), mitigating supply chain disruptions (C3 AI Supply Network Risk), proactively managing customer attrition (C3 AI Customer Churn Management), streamlining production schedules (C3 AI Production Schedule Optimization), forecasting equipment failures (C3 AI Predictive Maintenance), identifying financial irregularities (C3 AI Fraud Detection), and optimizing energy consumption (C3 AI Energy Management). These integrated, turnkey AI applications cater to a wide array of market segments, including oil and gas, chemicals, utilities, manufacturing, financial services, defense, intelligence, aerospace, healthcare, and telecommunications. The company maintains strategic alliances with key players like Baker Hughes (for oil & gas), FIS (financial services), Raytheon, and major technology firms including AWS, Intel, Google, and Microsoft. Originally incorporated in 2009 as C3 IoT, Inc., the company adopted its current name, C3.ai, Inc., in June 2019 and is headquartered in Redwood City, California.

Analyst Sentiment

20%
Underperform

From 14 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $8.00

▼ -12.9% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$6

Median

$7

High Bound

$12

Average

$8

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$8.00
▼ -12.85% Upside
Low Target
$6.00
-35% Risk
Median Target
$7.00
-24% Mid
High Target
$12.00
31% Max
Consensus
Hold
6 / 28 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MApr 30, 2026Jan 31, 2026Oct 31, 2025Jul 31, 2025Apr 30, 2025Jan 31, 2025Oct 31, 2024Jul 31, 2024
Market Cap ($M)1,3951,2911,5272,4383,1892,9324,0873,1493,343
Enterprise Value ($M)1,3341,2311,4432,3403,1132,7733,9673,0323,214
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-2.74-2.79-2.90-5.86-6.85-9.17-12.64-11.84-13.38
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.84-0.91-2.68-1.45-18.59
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)5.5725.0228.6732.4445.3926.9741.3833.3838.33
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.051.972.123.163.993.504.753.673.82
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-7.31-24.22-27.17-52.00-93.00283.99-182.62-79.72469.68
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)23.8527.1031.1444.3125.5040.1632.1436.86
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-2.90-10.66-11.12-23.16-27.54-36.39-51.69-48.33-54.08
Debt to Equity Ratio0.130.010.010.010.010.010.010.000.01

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 C3 AI INC CLASS A (AI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

C3 AI builds and commercializes an enterprise AI software platform designed to deploy domain-specific AI applications for large organizations. The core value proposition is an integrated “platform + application” approach: customers use the C3 AI platform to connect and govern enterprise data, define AI/ML workflows, and operationalize AI use cases through repeatable application templates. Revenue is generated when customers license the platform and deploy C3’s application layer (often alongside implementation and ongoing support), translating AI models into measurable operational outcomes (e.g., forecasting, optimization, or process automation) rather than standalone analytics.

From a customer-sticiness perspective, the platform architecture and deployment process emphasize data integration and workflow adoption. As deployments mature, organizational teams become embedded in the model lifecycle (data preparation, validation, monitoring, and change management), increasing the cost and operational risk of switching to an alternative system.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

C3 AI monetizes through a combination of:

  • Subscription/usage-style revenue for the C3 AI platform and deployed applications (recurring component), typically tied to the scope of deployment and customer enterprise footprint.
  • Professional services and implementation, which facilitate initial onboarding, data integration, model configuration, and application rollout. These services can be front-loaded around deployments, with additional ongoing support to expand or maintain use cases.
  • Support/maintenance and upgrade services, which tend to behave as recurring revenue once applications are live.

Margin drivers are generally software-oriented—scalable platform economics—offset by (1) deployment labor intensity in early customer rollouts and (2) costs associated with enterprise deployment environments (including cloud and data management overheads). Over multi-year horizons, improved revenue mix toward subscriptions/support and repeatable deployments typically supports higher gross margin and operating leverage.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

C3 AI competes in the enterprise AI application layer rather than selling only general-purpose tooling. The company’s main defensibility is centered on high switching costs created by data gravity and operational integration.

  • High Switching Costs (Data Gravity + Workflow Integration): Enterprise AI systems require extensive data engineering, governance, and model lifecycle operations. Once C3 is embedded in these workflows—covering ingestion, feature pipelines, evaluation, monitoring, and application execution—replacement is expensive and operationally risky.
  • Repeatable Deployment Patterns: C3’s platform/application approach reduces time-to-value versus fully custom AI engineering for each use case, supporting broader enterprise adoption.
  • Enterprise Trust and Governance Layer: Large deployments require controls around model performance, auditing, and change management; vendors that provide an integrated operational stack can become the system of record for AI workflows.

Competitive Benchmarking (primary competitors)

  • Palantir: Palantir is positioned as an enterprise decision intelligence platform with strong deployments in defense, government, and select commercial industries. The overlap is enterprise operational AI; however, C3’s positioning emphasizes an application/platform approach centered on deployable AI use cases and repeatable enterprise AI workflows.
  • Microsoft (Azure AI / Fabric ecosystem): Microsoft competes via a broad cloud and AI stack where customers can build AI solutions using general services. The tradeoff is flexibility versus the platform-specific switching costs that come from adopting a specialized enterprise AI application platform like C3.
  • Amazon (AWS AI services) (and similarly Google cloud AI platforms): These providers offer building blocks for machine learning and data services. C3 competes by packaging end-to-end deployment and operationalization into enterprise-ready applications, aiming to reduce integration and ongoing governance burden.

In contrast to hyperscaler platforms that primarily provide general-purpose infrastructure and AI services, C3’s emphasis on an integrated enterprise AI execution layer can create customer stickiness once deployments scale across business processes.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, C3’s addressable opportunity is supported by structural enterprise adoption trends for AI that moves beyond experimentation:

  • Enterprise operational AI demand: Organizations seek AI that impacts throughput, cost, reliability, safety, and planning—driving demand for platforms that operationalize models.
  • AI governance and lifecycle management: Compliance, monitoring, and auditability are becoming non-negotiable, favoring vendors that offer integrated governance around AI workflows.
  • Data modernization and consolidation: As enterprises unify data environments, vendors that can integrate into existing data architectures and preserve workflow stability can benefit from deployment expansion.
  • Scale effects across use cases: Once a customer adopts a platform, incremental use cases (within the same organization) can be added at lower marginal effort, supporting a “land and expand” model.
  • Industry verticalization of AI: Domain-specific applications tailored to operational constraints create higher value density than generic ML tooling, supporting higher willingness to pay for integrated solutions.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Platform commoditization risk: General-purpose cloud AI tools and model ecosystems can reduce differentiation for application-layer software.
  • Adoption and deployment risk: Enterprise AI rollouts are complex; delays in data readiness, integration scope, or measurable business outcomes can slow revenue conversion.
  • Technological change and performance risk: Rapid evolution of AI methods may require ongoing product updates to maintain performance, governance, and compatibility with customer data environments.
  • Competitive pressure: Hyperscalers and enterprise analytics vendors can bundle AI capabilities, increase pricing pressure, and steer customers toward “build on the platform” approaches.
  • Capital and operating leverage dynamics: Software companies in enterprise deployment cycles can face higher cost bases during scale-up, influencing path to sustained profitability.
  • Regulatory and privacy constraints: Data handling, model governance, and AI regulation can increase compliance costs and constrain permissible use cases.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market for enterprise AI software typically values companies on forward revenue growth, net retention dynamics, and the credibility of operating leverage, with frequent use of revenue-based metrics (e.g., EV/Revenue or P/S) rather than earnings-based multiples when profitability is still evolving. Key valuation drivers typically include:

  • Quality of recurring revenue (subscription/support share versus services-heavy mix)
  • Customer expansion indicators (evidence of land-and-expand across deployments and use cases)
  • Gross margin trajectory as deployments become more repeatable and scaled
  • Durability of differentiation against hyperscaler bundling and build-vs-buy trends
  • Balance of growth vs. cost base, including sales efficiency and R&D productivity

A favorable market view generally emerges when the company demonstrates scalable enterprise deployments, rising recurring revenue mix, and improving cost discipline while sustaining credible growth in the platform/application footprint.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

C3 AI’s long-term thesis rests on enterprise AI switching costs created by data gravity, operational workflow integration, and AI governance needs. While the competitive set includes hyperscalers and enterprise decision intelligence vendors, C3’s differentiating focus on deployable enterprise AI applications and platform operationalization can support a land-and-expand dynamic as customers scale use cases. The central investment question is whether C3 can sustain differentiation and scale deployment economics while navigating commoditization risk from cloud ecosystems and rapid AI technology shifts.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for AI.

zacks.com2026-07-30

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) Outpaces Stock Market Gains: What You Should Know

The latest trading day saw C3.ai, Inc. (AI) settling at $9.07, representing a +2.49% change from its previous close.

gurufocus.com2026-07-29

Ambiq Expands Global Capital Markets Presence Through Singapore Exchange Mainboard Dual Listing

Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ, SGX: AMQ), a technology leader in ultra-low power semiconductor solutions for edge AI, today announced its listing on the Main Bo

gurufocus.com2026-07-28

Snowflake Advances the Trusted Agentic Enterprise Era with Unified Monitoring and Cost Management

[url="]Snowflake[/url] (NYSE: SNOW), the AI Data Cloud company, today introduced [url="]Cortex AI Gateway[/url]2 and several AI security innovations that establ

gurufocus.com2026-07-27

The Hackett Group® Finds SG&A Costs Reach Five-Year Highs Across North America and Europe

[url="]The Hackett Group, Inc.[/url] (NASDAQ: HCKT), an ROI-led [url="]AI transformation[/url] firm, today announced findings from both its North America and Eu

zacks.com2026-07-24

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) is Attracting Investor Attention: Here is What You Should Know

C3.ai (AI) has been one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com users lately. So, it is worth exploring what lies ahead for the stock.

gurufocus.com2026-07-23

Harbour BioMed Announces Positive Profit Alert for 2026 Interim Results, Marking Seventh Consecutive Profitable Half-Year as Platform-Based Advantages Drive Sustainable Growth

Harbour BioMed Announces Positive Profit Alert for 2026 Interim Results, Marking Seventh Consecutive Profitable Half-Year as Platform-Based Adv

gurufocus.com2026-07-21

Ping An Unveils Innovative AI Solutions in Healthcare, Insurance and Payments at WAIC 2026

Ping An Unveils Innovative AI Solutions in Healthcare, Insurance and Payments at WAIC 2026 PR Newswire HONG KONG

businesswire.com2026-07-20

Arcadia Capital Expands Tech and Tech Services Coverage with Senior Hire of Jon Wesner

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $ai #AI--Arcadia Capital announced today the appointment of Jon Wesner as a Managing Director. Jon joins the firm's senior advisory team, expanding Arcadia Capital's coverage of tech and tech services companies and investors, driving global M&A and growth capital dealmaking globally. Based in Los Angeles, Jon will lead the firm's efforts across digital media, entertainment tech and related ecosystems. Jon joins Arcadia Capital with more than 15 years of experience in st.

zacks.com2026-07-20

Nebius vs. C3.ai: Which AI Growth Stock is the Better Buy?

Nebius Group N.V. NBIS and C3.ai, Inc. AI are capitalizing on the rapid adoption of AI, but they are pursuing distinct growth strategies to capture the expanding market opportunity.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-20

C3.ai: The Turnaround Nobody Wants To Own Yet

C3.ai is positioned as a distressed, event-driven turnaround with a base case fair value of $10, ~12% above current levels. Federal segment bookings are compounding rapidly, the partner pipeline is strong, and expenses have been restructured, providing a credible path to stabilization. The thesis hinges on gross margin recovery, sustained federal growth, and flat opex, with Q1 FY2027 as the critical catalyst for validation.

fool.com2026-07-18

What Does the C3.ai CEO's Sale of Company Shares Worth $4.2 Million Mean for Investors?

CEO Thomas Siebel executed the sale of 462,565 shares for ~$4.2 million at a weighted average price of $9.18 per share. The disposition reduced the executive's direct equity position by 39%.

zacks.com2026-07-16

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) Declines More Than Market: Some Information for Investors

In the closing of the recent trading day, C3.ai, Inc. (AI) stood at $8.91, denoting a -2.52% move from the preceding trading day.

247wallst.com2026-07-16

A 1950s Stock Checklist Just Predicted AI's Regulatory Reckoning in 2026

On the July 16 episode of The Investing for Beginners Podcast, co-host Stephen Morris drew a hard line around AI stocks, arguing investors should stay away from anything the government will regulate.

gurufocus.com2026-07-14

AI Solution Providers Shift From AI Features to AI-Enabled Execution

[url="]The Hackett Group, Inc.[/url] (NASDAQ: HCKT), an ROI-led AI transformation firm, today released new research examining how artificial intelligence (AI)

gurufocus.com2026-07-14

Summit Therapeutics Signs Agreement to Sell Phase III Asset Ridinilazole to Biossil, Inc.

Summit Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: SMMT) today announced it has signed an agreement with Toronto-based Biossil, Inc. for the sale of ridinilazole, an investigat

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-04-30

"AI reported Q4’26 revenue of $51.6M and net income of -$115.6M (EPS -$0.79). Revenue was -3.1% QoQ (from $53.3M in Q3’26) and -52.5% YoY (from $108.7M in Q4’25). Net income deterioration was also sharp: -$115.6M in Q4’26 vs -$133.4M in Q3’26 (improvement of +13.3% QoQ, i.e., less loss) and vs -$79.7M in Q4’25 (worse by -45.0% YoY). Profitability remained deeply negative. Gross margin fell sequentially from 17.3% (Q3’26) to 21.9% (Q4’26, improvement), but operating margin stayed around -2x (-2.14x in Q4’26 vs -2.64x in Q3’26). Operating expenses remained heavy, with R&D at $47.3M and selling/SG&A at elevated levels, keeping EBITDA at -$110.3M. Cash flow quality was weak: operating cash flow was -$53.0M and free cash flow -$53.3M. Balance sheet liquidity is strong with cash + short-term investments of $575.4M, and total assets of $816.3M, while no debt is shown. Shareholder returns appear negative: the stock price is $9.24, down -52.3% over 1 year, with 0% dividend yield and no buybacks reported in the quarter. Overall, sentiment/valuation look challenging given the large YoY revenue decline and persistent losses."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue declined -3.1% QoQ ($51.6M vs $53.3M) and -52.5% YoY ($51.6M vs $108.7M), showing a clear contraction trend.

Profitability

Neutral

Losses persist: net margin -2.24x and EPS -$0.79. QoQ losses improved (+13.3% less loss) while gross margin improved to 21.9% from 17.3%; however, YoY net income worsened (-45.0%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$53.0M and free cash flow -$53.3M in the most recent quarter, consistent with ongoing cash burn and no dividend support (dividends paid $0).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Strong liquidity: cash + short-term investments of $575.4M and total assets of $816.3M. No debt reported, and net debt is negative (net cash position).

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total shareholder return signals weakness: price is down -52.3% over 1 year and dividend yield is 0%. No buybacks are indicated in the quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Market is pricing in significant risk (P/E negative). Consensus price target ($8.25) is below the current $9.24, suggesting limited upside absent a turnaround.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

C3 AI reported Q4 FY26 revenue of $51.6M (94% subscription) with 37% non-GAAP gross margin and a $54.4M non-GAAP operating loss; free cash flow was -$54.8M. The quarter’s financials reflect major cost actions: non-GAAP operating expenses fell to $106M (down $33.9M YoY) alongside ~35% headcount reduction (from ~1,070 to ~700) and ~$135M annual operating cost savings, with ~$130M already realized. Operationally, management is betting the turnaround is execution-led: it asserts the “sales discipline” collapse drove the revenue decline, not product-market fit (customers reportedly happy, market large). Go-to-market is being re-anchored toward full territory coverage and large accounts (~1,000 opportunities vs ~100–150 prior), plus deployment success via dedicated customer teams. Guidance points to stabilization: Q1 FY27 revenue $50M–$54M and FY27 revenue $210M–$240M, but forecast confidence is constrained by stated uncertainty around demo license vs services mix. Overall tone is cautious: meaningful restructuring progress, yet execution and mix transparency risks remain.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Restructured go-to-market to focus on penetrating full territory and large accounts (order of ~1,000 account opportunities vs ~100–150 prior), targeting deal sizes from ~$0.5M–$2M, $5M–$50M, and $50M to $billion+
  • Shift to “agentic enterprise” operating model: AI-first mindset across legal, finance, sales, marketing, and programming activities to increase execution productivity
  • Operational model change for deployments: dedicated customer team assigned to pilots/production deployments through successful completion to drive higher deployment success and expansion into larger enterprise contracts

Business Development

  • No named customer or vendor partnerships disclosed in the transcript
  • U.S. Air Force mentioned in context of C3 AI Federal contract ramp (referred to as $450M and RSO $100M, but no definitive ramp detail provided)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Total revenue: $51.6M; subscription $48.4M (94% of total); professional services $3.2M (6%), including PES $2.1M
  • Non-GAAP gross margin: 37% (non-GAAP gross margin for professional services: 78%)
  • Non-GAAP operating loss: $54.4M; non-GAAP net loss: $48.8M; EPS: $(0.33)
  • Operating expenses: $106.0M non-GAAP, down $33.9M vs $139.9M prior-year quarter
  • Free cash flow: negative $54.8M
  • IPDs: 9 new initial production deployments signed in quarter; cumulative 417 IPDs, with 251 active

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash equivalents and marketable securities: $575.4M at quarter close; company cited $673M total cash equivalents and marketable securities “as of today”
  • Insider buying: Tom Siebel purchased 6.17M shares at $11.16 for ~$69M net proceeds; company “has received the cash”
  • No buyback amount or debt level disclosed in the transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Headcount reduced from ~1,070 in Jan 2026 to ~700 (approx. ~35% reduction)
  • Annual operating cost reduced by order of ~$135M; actions already completed to realize almost ~$130M planned savings
  • Services org flattened: “4 layers out” from 7 to 3
  • Product org consolidated into one team spanning platform, applications, product marketing, and services under a single senior leader (14 years at company)
  • Sales org globally restructured under a seasoned “chief revenue officer” (new global leadership)
  • Go-to-market changed from narrow quarterly small opportunities/pilot focus to multi-quarter campaigns penetrating territories and large accounts

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q1 FY27 revenue guidance: $50M to $54M
  • Q1 FY27 non-GAAP loss from operations guidance: $40.5M to $48.5M (midpoint assumes non-GAAP operating expenses of $96.5M, which is $31.6M lower than $128.1M in the same quarter last year)
  • FY27 revenue guidance: $210M to $240M
  • FY27 non-GAAP loss from operations guidance: $128M to $160M
  • Professional services mix guidance: 10%–15% of total revenue (including PES)
  • No explicit agentic automation milestone dates disclosed; CFO referenced actions driving savings with full realization of some non-employee cost savings starting in 2H FY27

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Management attributes revenue collapse primarily to sales execution failure (“sales fell off the cliff”, “sales discipline... surreal”); implies execution risk remains until turnaround proves out
  • Professional services/demo license mix uncertainty: management stated it does not know how much revenue will come from demo licenses vs PES vs other services even post-restructuring, limiting forecast precision
  • Federal ramp detail uncertainty: management could not confirm how the ramp of ~$450M U.S. Air Force contracts tracks expectations and said it would “find out” and get back to the analyst
  • Churn/non-renewal clarification: management stated it has not experienced significant loss of production customer, but did not provide specific churn metrics in the transcript

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Sales execution cause of revenue decline: Management said revenue fell because “sales discipline” collapsed over last five quarters, despite product strength and happy customers; CEO reiterated sales execution is the core issue driving deals, RPO, profitability, and cash generation, and asserted the sales problem is fixed by restructuring and protocols.
  • C3 AI Federal ramp tracking and contract specifics: An analyst asked how the ramp of ~$450M U.S. Air Force contracts tracks expectations and how restructuring affects it; CEO acknowledged limited access to operating details, referenced an RSO figure around $100M, then deferred specifics, saying it would be checked and followed up.
  • FY27 guidance mechanics: license vs PES vs demo licenses: Analyst requested clarity on how embedded license and PES assumptions drive FY27 guide and how demo licenses should be treated post-restructuring; CFO said professional services expected at 10%–15% of total revenue including PES, but management stated it does not know demo license vs PES vs services mix, only that revenue will be properly accounted for.

Sentiment: CAUTIOUS

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the AI Q4 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for AI.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (AI)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — C3.ai, Inc. (AI) Financial Profile