Aspen Aerogels, Inc.

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Market Cap

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. has a market capitalization of $467.4M.

Price: $5.64

-0.59 (-9.47%)

Market Cap: 467.43M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Donald R. Young

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Construction

IPO Date: 2014-06-13

Website: https://www.aerogel.com

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 467.43M|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells aerogel insulation products primarily for use in the energy infrastructure and building materials markets in the United States, Asia, Canada, Europe, and Latin America. The company offers PyroThin thermal barriers for use in lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles and energy storage industries; Pyrogel XTE that reduces the risk of corrosion under insulation in energy infrastructure operating systems; Pyrogel HPS for applications within the power generation market; Pyrogel XTF to provide protection against fire; Cryogel Z for sub-ambient and cryogenic applications in the energy infrastructure market; and Spaceloft Subsea for use in pipe-in-pipe applications in offshore oil production. It also offers Spaceloft Grey and Spaceloft A2 for use in the building materials market; and Cryogel X201, which is used in designing cold systems, such as refrigerated appliances, cold storage equipment, and aerospace systems. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Northborough, Massachusetts.

Analyst Sentiment

49%
Hold

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $4.88

▼ -13.5% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$4

Median

$5

High Bound

$6

Average

$5

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$4.88
▼ -13.48% Upside
Low Target
$4.00
-29% Risk
Median Target
$4.88
-14% Mid
High Target
$5.75
2% Max
Consensus
Buy
19 / 23 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)4672832345744875249612,1121,795
Enterprise Value ($M)4212362215734925139382,2021,854
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-4.17-2.99-0.80-22.64-13.43-0.4421.15-40.7026.68
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)4.321.08
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)2.037.475.667.856.246.667.8118.0015.24
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.191.330.991.881.581.671.564.163.47
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)13.148.6317.1196.66-28.93-71.1945.92-42233.34-99.79
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)6.245.347.856.316.527.6218.7715.74
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-7.96-16.93-5.24218.18767.63-1.7646.55-462.0069.41
Debt to Equity Ratio0.890.600.610.490.560.570.320.400.29
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-36.3%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for ASPN. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 ASPEN AEROGELS INC (ASPN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Aspen Aerogels produces high-performance aerogel insulation materials, primarily silica-based aerogel blankets and related insulation products, used where thermal efficiency and space/weight constraints matter. The value chain runs from proprietary aerogel manufacturing (turning base inputs into extremely low-conductivity insulation media), to converting those materials into customer-ready formats (e.g., blankets for integration into end-user systems), and finally into technical qualification with customers and system integrators.

The practical “how it works” is specification and integration: once an insulation material is qualified for a manufacturer’s system design—whether for industrial heat conservation, cryogenic applications, or building-envelope upgrades—Aspen’s products are embedded in bill-of-materials and procurement workflows. That qualification/integration step creates durability in demand and reduces the likelihood of rapid substitution.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Monetisation is driven by product sales of aerogel insulation materials and related offerings into end markets that value insulation performance per unit thickness. The business model is largely transactional in accounting terms (sales shipments), but it benefits from stickiness in engineered specifications that can translate into more predictable repeat purchasing.

Key margin drivers include:

  • Product mix toward higher-value insulation formats (applications with stronger performance requirements tend to support pricing discipline).
  • Manufacturing scale and utilization (fixed-cost absorption in conversion/production improves gross margin).
  • Process efficiency and yield (aerogel production economics depend on throughput and scrap/rework control).
  • Customer qualification pass-through (technical support and certification work can be leveraged across programs with long-lived designs).

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Aspen’s core moat is a combination of switching-cost dynamics and manufacturing/qualification capability.

  • High switching costs via specification and qualification: insulation performance requirements (thermal, mechanical, and long-duration durability) often require engineering validation, installation compatibility, and sometimes compliance testing. Once a system is designed around a material, substitution is costly and slow.
  • Technical performance credibility: aerogel is pursued when conventional insulation cannot meet thickness, weight, or heat-leak targets. Aspen’s ability to supply qualified materials at scale underpins its share in those applications.
  • Manufacturing know-how and scale: aerogel economics depend on process control and throughput. Competitors that can’t match both performance and supply stability face structural disadvantages.

Competitive benchmarking (primary competitors and substitutes):

  • Cabot Corporation (aerogel/insulation materials): competes in aerogel-related insulation solutions. Aspen’s positioning emphasizes high-performance aerogel blankets and program qualification for industrial and energy-focused applications, rather than a broader, diversified materials mix.
  • 3M (insulation and related materials): competes as a materials supplier and systems-oriented player. Aspen’s focus is narrower around aerogel insulation performance for demanding thermal environments.
  • Conventional insulation leaders (e.g., Owens Corning, Johns Manville): these companies compete through substitute insulation systems (fiberglass/foam/other media). Aspen’s advantage is the ability to deliver superior insulation effectiveness in constrained thickness/weight scenarios where substitutes become less competitive.

Net: the moat is not a network effect; it is an engineering-and-qualification moat supported by manufacturability and quality consistency, which together make volume difficult to displace once embedded in designs.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, Aspen’s growth opportunity is tied to secular demand for energy efficiency and low-carbon industrial infrastructure—markets where insulation performance and system efficiency translate into measurable operating and compliance benefits.

  • Decarbonization and energy-efficiency retrofits: building energy codes and retrofit economics support high-performance insulation where space constraints limit conventional materials.
  • Industrial heat conservation: process industries seek lower thermal losses to reduce energy consumption, supporting demand for higher-performance insulation.
  • Cryogenic and low-temperature infrastructure: LNG-related systems and emerging low-temperature supply chains benefit from insulation media that reduce boil-off and improve thermal management.
  • Hydrogen and alternative energy systems: storage and handling infrastructure increasingly requires advanced thermal management solutions, an area where high-performance insulation can be structurally valuable.
  • Customer program life cycles: once a material is qualified into an equipment platform, orders can follow the platform’s multi-year manufacturing cadence.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capital intensity and manufacturing ramp risk: scaling aerogel production and conversion capacity can strain working capital and profitability if utilization lags.
  • Program timing and qualification cycles: engineered materials can face delayed customer approvals, specification changes, or slower-than-expected commercial adoption.
  • Substitution risk: conventional insulation incumbents can gain share where performance requirements are less stringent or where total installed cost favors substitutes.
  • Competitive pressure in aerogel supply: increased capacity from peers can affect pricing and margin structure, particularly if demand growth lags new supply.
  • Input and energy costs: while aerogel is not a direct “low-cost fuel” business, manufacturing economics can still be influenced by energy usage and key input costs.
  • Customer concentration and procurement leverage: engineering-driven end markets can concentrate purchases with large OEMs/system integrators that exert pricing and contract terms.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value Aspen Aerogels using a blend of EV/EBITDA-style frameworks for industrial materials growth and P/S-style expectations for companies where the market is underwriting scale, margin expansion, and long-lived customer programs. The key valuation sensitivities are:

  • Gross margin trajectory driven by manufacturing efficiency and favorable mix.
  • Operating leverage as volumes rise with capacity utilization.
  • Durability of demand from qualified programs (signal of stickiness vs. purely cyclical purchase behavior).
  • Credibility of capacity plans (timelines, ramp rates, and unit cost reductions).

A sustained rerating generally requires evidence that demand growth converts into scalable profitability rather than margin dilution.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Aspen Aerogels offers an insulation materials thesis anchored in engineering-driven switching costs and manufacturing/qualification capability. The company participates in secular energy-efficiency and low-temperature infrastructure build-outs where high-performance insulation can be specified into equipment for multi-year program life cycles. The investment case hinges on successful scaling, sustained margin structure, and continued penetration into applications where conventional insulation is insufficient.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for ASPN.

globenewswire.com2026-06-03

Aspen Aerogels Named a 2025 Supplier of the Year by General Motors

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., June 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the “Company”), a technology leader in aerogel-based sustainability and electrification solutions, today announced that it has been named a 2025 General Motors Supplier of the Year.

globenewswire.com2026-05-14

Aspen Aerogels Begins Staged Restart of East Providence Facility

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., May 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the "Company") today announced the successful initiation of a staged restart of its manufacturing operations at its East Providence, Rhode Island facility.

marketbeat.com2026-05-09

Aspen Aerogels Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

Aspen Aerogels NYSE: ASPN said it expects revenue to improve sequentially through 2026 despite a first-quarter sales decline, a temporary shutdown at its East Providence, Rhode Island, manufacturing facility and continued volatility in electric vehicle-related demand.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-07

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-07

Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates

Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.28 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.27. This compares to a loss of $0.06 per share a year ago.

globenewswire.com2026-05-07

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights

East Providence manufacturing facility expected to have a staged restart beginning in May $175.6 million quarter-end cash balance; up from $158.6 million at year-end 2025 Secured an additional subsea pipeline award to be delivered in Q3 2026

globenewswire.com2026-04-23

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. Schedules First Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., April 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the "Company") today announced that Don Young, President & Chief Executive Officer, and Grant Thoele, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer, expect to discuss the Company's financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026, during a conference call scheduled for Thursday, May 7, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. ET. The Company also expects to release its quarterly financial results before the market opens on Thursday, May 7, 2026.

globenewswire.com2026-04-21

Aspen Aerogels Provides East Providence Facility Update

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., April 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the "Company") today provided an update on its manufacturing facility in East Providence, Rhode Island.

globenewswire.com2026-04-09

Aspen Aerogels Provides Update on Incident at East Providence Facility

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., April 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the "Company") today confirmed an incident occurred on the evening of April 8, 2026, at its manufacturing facility in East Providence, Rhode Island.

globenewswire.com2026-03-16

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. to Participate in the 38th Annual Roth Conference

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., March 16, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the “Company”), a technology leader in sustainability and electrification solutions, today announced that the Company is scheduled to participate in the 38th Annual Roth Conference on Monday, March 23, to be held at the Ritz Carlton in Laguna Niguel, CA.

defenseworld.net2026-03-06

Comparing American Biltrite (OTCMKTS:ABLT) and Aspen Aerogels (NYSE:ASPN)

American Biltrite (OTCMKTS:ABLT - Get Free Report) and Aspen Aerogels (NYSE: ASPN - Get Free Report) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability. Institutional and Insider Ownership 97.6% of Aspen

globenewswire.com2026-02-25

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. Shareholders Are Encouraged to Reach Out to Johnson Fistel for More Information About Potentially Recovering Their Losses

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims on behalf of investors of Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN). The investigation focuses on Aspen's executive officers and whether investor losses may be recovered under federal securities laws.

seekingalpha.com2026-02-25

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

globenewswire.com2026-02-25

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results and Recent Business Highlights

$158.6 million year-end cash balance; $37.6 million GM commercial settlement payment expected in Q1 2026 North Sea subsea pipeline award and continued European OEM program progress Initiated a strategic review to strengthen long-term competitive positioning

globenewswire.com2026-02-04

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. Schedules Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass., Feb. 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (NYSE: ASPN) (“Aspen” or the "Company") today announced that Don Young, President & Chief Executive Officer, and Grant Thoele, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer, expect to discuss the Company's financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025, during a conference call scheduled for Wednesday, February 25, 2026, at 8:30 a.m.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"ASPN reported Q1’26 revenue of $37.9M and net income of -$23.7M (EPS -$0.29). On a YoY basis, revenue fell -52.0% (vs. $78.7M in Q1’25) and net income improved slightly in absolute terms (loss narrowed vs. -$301.2M in Q1’25; YoY change in net income is +92.1% toward profitability, though still deeply negative). QoQ, revenue decreased -8.4% (vs. $41.3M in Q4’25) and net income improved materially (loss narrowed vs. -$72.9M in Q4’25). Margins remain weak/volatile: gross margin was 11.3% in Q1’26, down sharply from the prior quarter’s negative gross margin, but still well below the stronger Q2–Q3’25 levels (~28–32%). Operating income is -$20.4M with net margin -62.5%. Cash flow quality is mixed but trending better: operating cash flow was +$34.1M and free cash flow +$32.8M in Q1’26, versus +$16.1M OCF in Q4’25. Despite sustained losses, liquidity is robust with $173.9M cash and $410.5M total assets; equity remains positive at $213.5M. Shareholder returns appear negative on momentum (price is $3.48, -32.7% over 1 year; no dividend/buybacks indicated), which weighs on the total return score."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Q1’26 revenue fell -52.0% YoY and -8.4% QoQ, signaling a contracting demand/volume environment.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income loss narrowed QoQ (-$72.9M to -$23.7M) but remains severe (net margin -62.5%). Gross margin improved from Q4’25 but is still far below Q2–Q3’25 levels.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow swung to +$34.1M and free cash flow +$32.8M in Q1’26, improving versus Q4’25; however, results are not yet supported by sustained profitability.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Liquidity is strong (cash $173.9M; current ratio 2.48) and balance sheet remains resilient with positive equity ($213.5M), though debt increased QoQ.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

No dividend indicated and buybacks appear negligible; 1Y price momentum is negative (-32.7%), lowering total shareholder return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Street target consensus is $5.75 vs. $3.48 current (~+65% upside implied), but fundamentals remain highly volatile with negative earnings.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Q1 2026 reflected a low-season setup compounded by a specific East Providence (EP) manufacturing disruption and Middle East delivery delays. Revenue fell 8% QoQ to $37.9M; Energy Industrial dropped 15% QoQ while Thermal Barrier was flat despite softer GM volumes. Despite lower revenue, adjusted EBITDA improved 29% to -$12.7M, helped by GM claim proceeds ($37.6M total; $3.5M recognized in Q1 with ~$4.9M/quarter thereafter through end of 2027 under ASC 606). Management’s near-term risk is restart-related cost inflation—expedited freight, repairs, and inventory builds—potentially into Q3, with Q2 adjusted EBITDA still expected negative (-$10M to -$4M). Offsetting this, guidance targets sequential revenue growth and an Energy Industrial ~20% full-year growth outlook, supported by subsea, LNG, and refinery turnaround normalization. Europe thermal barrier momentum is guiding $10M-$15M for 2026, while Energy Industrial scaling toward a $200M high-margin segment remains the central strategic narrative into the decade.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Energy Industrial 3-part growth drivers: (1) Subsea pipeline, (2) LNG/natural gas infrastructure with project-level execution, (3) refinery and petrochemical maintenance/turnarounds as reliability needs normalize
  • PyroThin/thermal barrier: Europe EV ramp benefiting from OEM design awards and supply flexibility via diversified battery cell suppliers
  • Battery energy storage systems (BESS): progress through qualifications and commercial discussions targeting initial revenue in 2026 post internal restructuring

Business Development

  • Thermal barrier: GM EV market share gains; GM claim proceeds of $37.6 million (recognized under ASC 606 ratably through end of 2027)
  • Energy Industrial: awarded a second subsea project deliverable in Q3 (positions 2026 subsea revenue within $10M-$20M historical annual range)
  • Energy Industrial: secured 2 project awards in Q1 2026 expected to contribute revenue in 2026

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $37.9M total; down 8% QoQ, with Energy Industrial down 15% QoQ (below expectations) and thermal barrier flat QoQ
  • Segment GM: gross profit $4.3M (11% gross margin) impacted by lower production volumes not covering fixed manufacturing costs; gross margin at segment level was 15% (Energy Industrial) and 6% (Thermal Barrier)
  • Adjusted EBITDA: negative $12.7M vs negative $18.0M last quarter (29% improvement) despite slightly lower revenues
  • Liquidity/cash: generated $17M cash in Q1; cash and cash equivalents ended at $175.6M vs $158.6M at YE 2025
  • One-time/GAAP items: $2.2M property tax charge related to Plant 2; ~ $1.0M nonrecurring professional services; GAAP net loss -$23.7M vs -$72.9M last quarter
  • GM claim accounting: $3.5M revenue booked in Q1 with ~$4.9M revenue per quarter thereafter through end of 2027 (ASC 606 ratable recognition)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash/Runway: $175.6M cash at Q1 end; substantial MidCap covenant headroom
  • Debt: term loan balance $86M at quarter end; Q1 debt payments $15.6M including $6.5M term loan principal amortization and $7.6M revolving credit facility reduction
  • Q2 cash outflows expected: $20M-$30M total including <$12M CapEx and scheduled debt payments; working capital variability depends on inventory production/sales timing
  • Full-year capital assumptions unchanged: < $10M CapEx and ~$26M scheduled debt payments
  • Potential Plant 2 asset sale: most likely a Q4 event; proceeds applied to reduce term debt dollar-for-dollar

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • East Providence (EP) aerogel manufacturing disruption: April 8 explosion in high-temperature oven; plant damage confined to specific area; temporary cessation of operations
  • Staged restart expected to begin in May, subject to mechanical/operational/safety reviews and coordination with local/state agencies
  • Near-term mitigation: leveraged external manufacturing capacity and used inventory to limit commercial impact to date
  • Q2 cost pressure: expedited freight/repair costs and inventory build across EP and external manufacturing facility (EMF) expected elevated costs into Q2 and potentially Q3
  • Restructuring framework: designed for EBITDA breakeven at $50M quarterly revenue; management expects to reach it in 2H 2026 assuming continued production/supply mitigation success
  • Sourcing/resilience: working with external manufacturing facility to enhance capabilities for Energy, Industrial, and Thermal Barrier segments and improve short/long-term supply flexibility

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year Energy Industrial target: ~20% revenue growth for 2026 despite Q1 disruptions and Middle East delivery delays
  • Thermal barrier (PyroThin) Europe revenue outlook: 2026 range $10M-$15M based on momentum translating from recent quarter increases
  • Q2 2026 guidance: total revenue $40M-$48M (5%-28% QoQ growth); adjusted EBITDA expected between -$10M and -$4M
  • Q2 revenue assumptions: GM annualized production rate ~55,000-65,000 vehicles in the quarter (vs ~43,000 annualized equivalent in Q1)
  • GM production outlook reference: IHS forecast nearly 100,000 vehicles for 2026, implying production weighted to 2H 2026
  • Sequential revenue growth: management expects sequential quarterly revenue growth through 2026

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • EP plant disruption creates near-term cost pressure and elevated costs (expedited freight, repair, inventory build) difficult to estimate across products/locations/customers during the safe restart process
  • Energy Industrial Q1 below expectations: constrained customer demand impacted by ancillary effects from conflict in Iran causing logistics and inventory challenges
  • EV thermal barrier: U.S. EV market in reset mode with ~5%-6% market share; GM and broader production/destocking volatility can affect volumes
  • Supply chain constraints: need for external manufacturing capacity and increased expedited logistics may continue through restart and early ramps
  • Timing risk: Q2 profitability variability resides above the gross profit line; reaching EBITDA breakeven at $50M quarterly revenue depends on success of mitigation efforts

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Europe thermal barrier ramp drivers and whether volatility in energy markets is accelerating OEM EV production. Management: Don said it’s too early to tie the Q1 ramp to higher energy prices/ICE-to-EV switching; OEM momentum is broader and built over time. He highlighted Europe EV share gains and award OEMs benefiting, plus supply flexibility including East Providence and a Chinese EMF supplier for meeting expectations.
  • Topic: Energy Industrial $200M ambition—visibility into subsea and LNG opportunities through the decade. Management: Don pointed to three pillars—Subsea with a strong opportunity roster (historic $10M-$20M annual range, recent awards), LNG with project-level engagement with owners/EPCs to expand scope, and daily maintenance/turnaround demand as plants run at high utilization. Together, he called $200M realistic.
  • Topic: EMF reliance during Rhode Island disruption—capacity sufficiency to meet ramp. Management: Don emphasized wanting maximum flexibility and customer expectation fulfillment, explicitly stating that capability includes both East Providence and the Chinese EMF supplier. He did not quantify incremental EMF dependence in the answer, but framed EMF as part of resilience during ramp uncertainty.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ASPN Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for ASPN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (ASPN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (ASPN) Financial Profile