B&G Foods, Inc.

B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) Market Cap

B&G Foods, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Kenneth Casey Keller

Sector: Consumer Defensive

Industry: Packaged Foods

IPO Date: 2007-05-23

Website: https://bgfoods.com

B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Consumer Defensive

Company Profile

B&G Foods, Inc. manufactures, sells, and distributes a portfolio of shelf-stable and frozen foods, and household products in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. It operates through Specialty, Meals, Frozen & Vegetables, and Spices & Flavor Solutions segments. The company offers frozen and canned vegetables, vegetables, canola and other cooking oils, vegetable shortening, cooking sprays, oatmeal and other hot cereals, fruit spreads, canned meats and beans, bagel chips, spices, seasonings, hot sauces, wine vinegar, maple syrups, molasses, salad dressings, pizza crusts, Mexican-style sauces, dry soups, taco shells and kits, salsas, pickles, peppers, tomato-based products, crackers, baking powder and soda, corn starch, nut clusters, and other specialty products. It markets its products under various brands, including Crisco, Clabber Girl, Bear Creek, Polaner, Underwood, B&G, Grandma’s, New York Style, B&M, Baker’s Joy, Regina, TrueNorth, Static Guard, SugarTwin, Brer Rabbit, Ortega, Maple Grove Farms of Vermont, Cream of Wheat, Las Palmas, Victoria, Mama Mary’s, Spring Tree, McCann’s, Carey’s, Vermont Maid, Green Giant, Dash, Spice Islands, Weber, Ac’cent, Tone’s, Trappey’s, Durkee, Wright’s, B&G Sandwich Toppers, Bear Creek Country Kitchens, Canoleo, Cary’s, Cream of Rice, Joan of Arc, MacDonald’s, Molly McButter, New York Flatbreads, Old London, and Sa-són brands. The company sells and distributes its products directly, as well as through a network of independent brokers and distributors to supermarket chains, foodservice outlets, mass merchants, warehouse clubs, non-food outlets, and specialty distributors. The company was formerly known as B&G Foods Holdings Corp. and changed its name to B&G Foods, Inc. in October 2004. B&G Foods, Inc. was founded in 1889 and is headquartered in Parsippany, New Jersey.

Analyst Sentiment

39%
Underperform

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $4.67

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$4

Median

$5

High Bound

$5

Average

$5

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$4.67
▲ +32.29% Upside
Low Target
$4.00
13% Risk
Median Target
$5.00
42% Mid
High Target
$5.00
42% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 B AND G FOODS INC (BGS) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

B&G Foods is a branded consumer foods producer selling shelf-stable products across retail grocery channels and, to a lesser extent, foodservice. The company monetizes through a manufacturer-to-distributor-to-retailer value chain: finished goods are produced in scale manufacturing facilities, then distributed to wholesalers and retail customers where products compete at the shelf through category relevance and trade terms.

Customer stickiness is driven less by “one-to-one” customer contracts and more by retailer assortment decisions and repeat purchase behavior in staple categories. Retailers balance brand equity, margin structure, and the operational convenience of dealing with a multi-category supplier, which can support ongoing shelf placement even during promotion cycles.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily generated from the sale of branded food products to retailers and distributors. Monetisation is largely transactional in nature (each period’s shipments), but the demand base behaves like recurring consumption: consumers repurchase staples (e.g., condiments and baking/meal-prep ingredients), and retailers maintain assortment to avoid demand leakage.

Margin drivers tend to follow the same structural levers:

  • Branded vs. private label mix: branded products typically command stronger pricing power and can help stabilize gross margin versus categories where private label sets a lower reference price.
  • Commodity and input costs: raw material inflation/deflation flows through via pricing actions, contract structures, and the timing of inventory realization.
  • Manufacturing utilization: fixed-cost absorption improves when volumes are steady and production scheduling is efficient.
  • Trade spend and promotion intensity: retailer mechanics (case discounts, slotting-like incentives, and promotional patterns) influence net pricing and operating margins.
  • Freight and logistics: distribution efficiency and freight costs affect delivered margins.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

B&G Foods competes in shelf-stable food categories where scale, distribution, and the economics of retail assortment matter. The most relevant moat is Scale/Distribution leverage combined with private-label resistance—the ability to earn acceptable margins while maintaining meaningful brand participation in categories that retailers otherwise rationalize toward private label.

  • Scale and distribution leverage: Competitors with comparable or larger scale can reduce unit costs through manufacturing efficiencies, procurement volume, and improved logistics planning.
  • Private label resistance: In branded staple segments, competitive pressure from retailer brands is persistent. Sustained share tends to depend on product differentiation, established consumer usage patterns, and the retailer’s need for branded throughput that does not fully cannibalize category velocity.

Competitive benchmarking (primary rivals):

  • McCormick & Company (spices and seasonings): McCormick’s emphasis is narrower but can be stronger in spice-led brand power; B&G competes more across broader condiment and meal-prep adjacent categories.
  • Kraft Heinz (condiments and sauces): Heinz operates at very large scale in overlapping condiment categories; B&G typically competes as a multi-category player with a different brand portfolio and cost structure.
  • Conagra Brands (pantry staples and frozen/brands where applicable): Conagra brings diversified exposure and distribution reach; B&G’s positioning is anchored in shelf-stable prepared foods and seasoning/ingredient applications.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is likely to be driven by category durability plus operating improvements rather than a single high-growth “product cycle.” Key drivers include:

  • Share retention and modest category share gains: Maintaining retail placement through disciplined trade spending can preserve volume even when the industry’s nominal growth is modest.
  • Pricing architecture: The ability to implement rational price increases during input cost inflation, followed by margin recovery as cost inflation normalizes.
  • Private label navigation: Many retailers expand private label when supply chains are stable and reference pricing is favorable; B&G can mitigate this by prioritizing higher-performing brand SKUs and protecting customer economics.
  • Product innovation within staples: Incremental line extensions and format changes that improve consumer convenience or use-case breadth can support unit growth without requiring entirely new category creation.
  • Channel and geography expansion: Continued penetration of food distribution networks and expansion in markets where staple consumption patterns and retail assortment allow meaningful branded presence.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Retailer consolidation and private-label share creep: If large retailers strengthen private brand penetration, branded pricing power can compress.
  • Commodity and input cost volatility: Inflation in key inputs (e.g., grains, oils, sweeteners) can pressure margins if pricing actions lag cost realization.
  • Trade spending and promotional competition: A higher promotion environment can reduce net pricing and delay operating margin expansion.
  • Manufacturing and quality risk: Food safety incidents, production downtime, or compliance failures can create direct costs and longer-term brand and retailer impacts.
  • Regulatory and labeling requirements: Sodium, allergen, nutrition labeling, and ingredient disclosure regimes can increase cost and constrain formulation flexibility.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Consumer staple food companies are typically valued on cash flow durability and gross margin/operating margin sustainability. Market participants often look for a defensible earnings base supported by pricing discipline, stable shipment economics, and effective working-capital management.

Valuation frameworks commonly center on EV/EBITDA and enterprise cash flow yield, with a secondary emphasis on earnings quality. Key valuation swing factors include: branded-to-total mix, realized pricing power net of trade spend, and the company’s ability to offset commodity volatility through operational efficiency and contract/brand mechanisms.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

B&G Foods offers an evergreen consumer-staples profile where the core investment question is not transformative growth, but margin resilience and share maintenance. The primary moat is scale/distribution leverage paired with private-label resistance in staple categories—an advantage that can support steady cash generation if the company sustains disciplined trade/pricing behavior and manages input cost volatility effectively.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-04-04

"BGS reported Q1’26 (ended 2026-04-04) Revenue of $408.9M and Net Income of -$32.5M (EPS: -$0.41). On a YoY basis, Revenue grew from $425.4M in Q1’25 to $408.9M in Q1’26 (-3.8%), while Net Income deteriorated from +$0.8M to -$32.5M (down ~$33.3M; profit to loss). QoQ, Revenue fell from $539.6M in Q4’25 to $408.9M (-24.2%), and Net Income swung from -$15.2M to -$32.5M (worsening by ~$17.3M). Profitability weakened across the quarter: gross margin declined to 19.5% (from 22.7% in Q4’25 and 21.2% in Q1’25). Operating margin turned more negative (-2.7% vs +5.2% in Q4’25 and +8.4% in Q1’25), pushing net margin to -8.0%. Cash flow data in this filing is not populated for Q1’26 (operating cash flow and free cash flow reported as 0), so cash-flow quality cannot be confirmed this quarter. Balance sheet resilience is mixed: total assets were roughly flat (~$2.84B), but equity decreased to ~$403M from ~$453M in Q4’25, while net debt was slightly improved versus prior quarter (net debt: -$7.0M vs $1.9B prior). Shareholder returns: the stock is down 11.3% over 1Y (no >20% momentum), with dividend yield shown around ~3.8%; however, the latest quarter is loss-making and dividends were not indicated as paid in Q1’26. Analyst consensus targets ($5.5 vs ~$5.43) suggest limited upside and a cautious valuation posture."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue declined YoY (-3.8% from $425.4M to $408.9M) and fell QoQ (-24.2% from $539.6M to $408.9M), indicating a weakening demand/volume trend into the latest quarter.

Profitability

Neutral

Margins contracted materially: gross margin to 19.5% (vs 22.7% in Q4’25 and 21.2% in Q1’25). Operating margin swung to -2.7% (vs +5.2% in Q4’25 and +8.4% in Q1’25) and net income moved to -$32.5M from +$0.8M YoY.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 cash flow fields appear unpopulated (operating cash flow/free cash flow reported as 0), limiting assessment. Over the prior quarters, cash flows were volatile and often pressured when earnings turned negative, which raises quality concerns.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets are stable (~$2.84B QoQ), but equity declined to ~$403M from ~$453M. Debt appears much lower on a net basis (net debt improved to about -$7M), suggesting reduced financial strain, though profitability deterioration is a risk.

Shareholder Returns

Caution

1Y price performance is -11.3% (no strong momentum boost). Dividend yield is indicated around ~3.8%, but with recent losses and no Q1’26 dividend cash-out shown, dividend support is less certain.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target ($5.5) is close to the current price (~$5.43), implying modest expectations. High-quality upside appears limited without an earnings recovery.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

B&G Foods delivered a Q1 “portfolio reset” quarter: total net sales declined 3.9% YoY, but base business net sales rose 2.8% and adjusted EBITDA margin expanded ~20 bps to 14.1%. The headline leverage story improved—net debt/pro forma adjusted EBITDA fell to 6.07x (from 6.57x)—supported by Green Giant U.S. frozen divestiture proceeds and the new contract manufacturing arrangement, while Green Giant Canada should further cut leverage by ~0.25 turn on close. Guidance was raised for FY26 (net sales $1.735B–$1.775B; adjusted EBITDA $275M–$290M; adjusted EBITDA margin ~15.8%–16.3%), with the primary change being inclusion of College Inn and Kitchen Basics. Management expects base organic net sales to trend flat-to-slightly down for the rest of the year, attributing volatility to the 53rd week lap and channel mix. Key risk focus remains soybean oil/oil and tariff-driven input inflation, with pricing actions contingent on persistence of elevated costs.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Spices & Flavor Solutions net sales +9.1% YoY, with segment adjusted EBITDA +13.1% driven by volume and pricing/mix
  • Frozen & Vegetables segment recovery in the first 2 months of Q1, driven by higher volumes, lower trade spend, and lower manufacturing costs
  • Positive EBITDA/margin impact expected from replacing low-margin Green Giant U.S. frozen with higher-profit College Inn and Kitchen Basics broth/stock
  • Cost savings and restructuring initiatives contributing to Q1 improvements, including reduced unallocated central overheads (~$2M vs last year)

Business Development

  • Divestiture: Green Giant U.S. frozen business sold to Seneca Foods Corporation (closed March 2)
  • Acquisition: College Inn and Kitchen Basics broth and stock businesses acquired from Del Monte Foods (closed March 19)
  • Green Giant U.S. frozen contract manufacturing established at frozen vegetable facility in Mexico with the acquirer of the Green Giant U.S. frozen business (generated $8.5M net sales in Q1 first month)
  • Pending divestiture: Green Giant Canada requiring Canadian regulatory approval (expected to close in Q2 FY26)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Base business net sales +2.8% YoY (+$9.9M) to $365.1M; management expects base organic net sales trend flat to slightly down for the remainder of FY26
  • Total net sales $408.9M, down $16.5M (-3.9% YoY) due primarily to Green Giant U.S. frozen, Le Sueur U.S., and Don Pepino divestitures; partially offset by contract manufacturing (+$8.5M) and College Inn/Kitchen Basics acquisition (+$2.9M for partial month)
  • Adjusted EBITDA $57.6M; adjusted EBITDA margin 14.1% vs 13.9% prior year (+20 bps)
  • Gross margin 19.5% vs 21.2% (-170 bps); adjusted gross margin 20.7% vs 21.3% (-60 bps)
  • SG&A as % of net sales 12.3% vs 11.6% (+70 bps) driven by acquisition/divestiture-related and nonrecurring expenses
  • Net loss $32.5M (-$0.41 diluted EPS) driven by $36.3M noncash loss on sale of assets related to Green Giant U.S. frozen divestiture plus $5.8M noncash disposals/impairments and nonrecurring costs
  • Adjusted diluted EPS guidance for FY26: $0.575 to $0.675
  • FY26 guidance raised: net sales $1.735B to $1.775B and adjusted EBITDA $275M to $290M (with adjusted EBITDA margin 15.8% to 16.3%)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Dividend reduced by 50% to $0.095 per quarter ($0.38 annualized), declared during call; payable July 30, 2026 to holders of record June 30, 2026
  • Leverage: Net debt to pro forma adjusted EBITDA (pre share-based comp and extraordinary tariffs) improved to 6.07x at Q1 end vs 6.57x at Q4 end (-0.50x)
  • Leverage target: reduce net debt to ~6.0x or less by midpoint of FY26; Green Giant Canada expected to reduce net leverage by ~0.25 turn once closed
  • No share repurchase/buyback amount disclosed in provided transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Portfolio reshaping: completed Green Giant U.S. frozen divestiture (final 2 months included in Q1 results) and acquired College Inn/Kitchen Basics (partial month in Q1); Green Giant Canada divestiture pending
  • Created/used frozen vegetable manufacturing contract manufacturing arrangement in Mexico for Green Giant U.S. frozen (cost-plus structure expected to provide modest but stable profit stream)
  • Operational focus: reduce direct Green Giant costs and restructure central costs to reflect divestitures; proactive steps to reduce ongoing SG&A commitments and minimize stranded overhead
  • Manufacturing output: 7 of 10 internal facilities increased output in Q1 vs 2025; remaining two were below prior year but ahead of budget YTD

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • FY26 guidance range: net sales $1.735B–$1.775B; adjusted EBITDA $275M–$290M; adjusted EBITDA margin ~15.8%–16.3%
  • FY26 base business net sales trend: flat to slightly down for remainder of year (with Q4 lap of the 53rd week from FY25)
  • Long-term algorithm target: base business net sales improvement toward ~1%
  • Oil/input risk: management expects oil/fuel costs to come down from current highs but remain elevated YoY; if oil and fuel remain high, they will evaluate pricing actions

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Oil and soybean oil price risk: soybean oil up >$0.70/lb; relationship to crude oil/biofuels creates elevated and potentially persistent input costs
  • Tariff and other input cost inflation pressure: Q1 commentary notes tariff costs largely offset in Spices, but management is monitoring signs of sustained inflationary pressures
  • Customer pricing pass-through uncertainty: logistics and packaging cost pass-through may be tougher with retailers; pricing power effectiveness could vary by channel/contract structure
  • Guidance excludes potential changes in inflation/tariff policy and escalation risks in Eastern Europe/Middle East/Latin America
  • Pending Green Giant Canada divestiture not reflected in guidance (expected ~neutral adjusted EBITDA impact but could create accounting/balance-sheet effects until closed)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Flat-to-slightly-down remainder of FY26 despite consumption softness; analyst asked how guidance reconciles tracked consumption down vs management’s outlook. Management clarified guidance reflects addition of College Inn/Kitchen Basics only, and that “organic” includes both tracked and untracked/unmeasured channels plus Canada, totaling <60% tracked.
  • Topic: Input-cost coverage and ability to execute pricing if inflation reaccelerates; analyst sought what’s covered and for how long. Management said normal forward purchases provide coverage “for a decent portion of this year,” emphasized divestiture removed Green Giant U.S. frozen, and highlighted oil/soybean oil as the key monitored input for action.
  • Topic: Dividend cut rationale and flexibility; analyst asked why exactly a 50% reduction. Management explained it generates about $30M annualized excess cash, and framed the policy as balancing debt reduction and dividends—at least 50% to debt reduction and 50% to dividends—given the interest-rate environment.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BGS Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) Financial Profile