Bank of Marin Bancorp

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Market Cap

Bank of Marin Bancorp has a market capitalization of $420.9M.

Price: $26.00

0.22 (0.85%)

Market Cap: 420.93M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Timothy D. Myers

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1999-12-23

Website: https://www.bankofmarin.com

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) - Company Information

Market Cap: 420.93M|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Bank of Marin Bancorp operates as the holding company for Bank of Marin that provides a range of financial services primarily to small to medium-sized businesses, professionals, not-for-profit organizations, and individuals in California, the United States. It offers personal and business checking and savings accounts; and individual retirement, health savings, and demand deposit marketplace accounts, as well as time certificates of deposit, certificate of deposit account registry and insured cash sweep services. The company also provides commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and consumer loans, as well as construction financing and home equity lines of credit. In addition, it offers merchant and payroll, and cash management services; credit cards; fraud detection tools; and mobile deposit, remote deposit capture, automated clearing house, wire transfer, and image lockbox services. Further, the company provides wealth management and trust services comprising customized investment portfolio management, financial planning, trust administration, estate settlement, and custody services, as well as 401(k) plan services; and automated teller machines, and telephone and digital banking services. It operates through 12 branch offices in Marin, southern Sonoma counties, and north of San Francisco, California; and a loan production office in San Francisco. The company was incorporated in 1989 and is headquartered in Novato, California.

Analyst Sentiment

69%
Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $28.25

▲ +8.7% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$26

Median

$28

High Bound

$31

Average

$28

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$28.25
▲ +8.65% Upside
Low Target
$26.00
0% Risk
Median Target
$28.25
9% Mid
High Target
$30.50
17% Max
Consensus
Hold
7 / 15 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)421408414386365353379322265
Enterprise Value ($M)20919625818615711426311657
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)8.8011.992.6112.83-10.7018.0815.7917.63-3.03
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.030.1254.440.02
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)2.268.755.229.5018.629.489.878.4272.42
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.051.031.050.870.830.800.870.740.61
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)12.70483.6031.4132.0051.6376.2935.9232.9878.91
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)4.203.254.598.013.076.863.0215.56
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)3.5816.915.4518.43-14.7416.2625.7515.25-1.69
Debt to Equity Ratio-3.640.060.180.040.050.050.050.050.05

BMRC Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$26.00
Intrinsic Value$14.52
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 44.2%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 13%13%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.80B
Perpetuity TV Value$15.12B
Discounted TV (PV)$6.39B
TV Weighting %62.6%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 BANK OF MARIN BANCORP (BMRC) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

BANK OF MARIN BANCORP operates as a relationship-driven community bank in California, primarily originating and servicing loans while funding them with a core deposit base. The value chain is straightforward: (1) attract deposits—often at favorable rates due to local customer relationships and service, (2) deploy capital into earning assets such as loans and securities, and (3) manage risk through underwriting standards, diversification, and disciplined credit administration. Because banking customers rely on ongoing interaction—credit access, account servicing, deposit relationships, and problem resolution—relationships can be “sticky,” supporting continuity of funding and repeat loan activity.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation engine is dominated by net interest income (NII), generated by the spread between yields on loans/securities and the cost of deposits/other borrowings. Margin performance depends on interest-rate dynamics and balance-sheet positioning, but the structural drivers are funding mix and asset yield discipline. Non-interest income contributes additional diversification through items such as service fees, lending-related fees (including SBA/other supported lending channels), and other banking services. Net interest income typically remains the primary determinant of earnings power, while operating efficiency (expense control relative to revenue) influences how much of that interest spread translates into bottom-line profitability. Over time, fee and service income can act as a partial offset when net interest margin becomes pressured.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The most durable moat in a community bank framework tends to be a combination of (a) cost of deposits advantages, (b) regulatory and operational barriers, and (c) credit culture that reduces loss volatility.

  • Cost of Deposits / Relationship Funding: BMRC’s local-market focus supports recurring deposit generation and retention, which can help reduce reliance on higher-cost wholesale funding during stress periods.
  • Regulatory Moat: Banking is capital- and compliance-intensive (capital adequacy, credit risk governance, consumer protection, reporting). New entrants face a long runway to build credibility, controls, and balance-sheet capacity.
  • Credit Culture & Underwriting Discipline: Community banks can outperform through conservative underwriting, careful monitoring, and disciplined workout processes—particularly important for commercial real estate and small-business lending cycles.
  • Switching Costs (Relationship Banking): Customers face practical switching friction for lending, treasury services, and deposit accounts due to relationship history, documentation, and the time needed to re-establish credit terms.

COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (industry peers): BMRC’s competitive set includes other regional banks that compete for the same pool of borrowers and deposits in overlapping markets, such as:

  • Pacific Premier Bancorp (PPBI)
  • Cathay General Bancorp (CATY)
  • Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC)

BMRC’s positioning emphasizes a community-bank approach with a geographic concentration in the Northern California footprint and relationship-based origination and servicing. Larger or differently focused peers may operate with broader geographic diversification, different borrower mixes, or distinct operating models (including heavier emphasis on certain client segments). Those differences can change how quickly each bank can price deposits and loans, and how credit performance translates through cycles; however, the underlying competitive battleground remains the same: maintaining deposit franchise quality while funding a risk-managed loan portfolio.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is typically driven less by one-time product launches and more by balance-sheet and customer-share dynamics:

  • Managed expansion of core deposits: Sustained customer acquisition and retention can support loan growth without excessive reliance on expensive funding.
  • Small-business and sponsor credit demand: Steady capital formation in the U.S. economy supports lending opportunities, particularly when underwriting remains selective and portfolio monitoring is disciplined.
  • Commercial real estate and owner-occupied lending selectivity: Banks that maintain underwriting discipline can participate in CRE cycles without disproportionate loss exposure.
  • Supported lending channels (e.g., SBA-related frameworks): When properly controlled, these channels can expand origination volumes with structured underwriting frameworks.
  • Operational efficiency: Process improvements and digital enablement can lower cost-to-serve, helping convert revenue growth into earnings retention.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit cycle risk: Loan losses can rise during downturns, with particular sensitivity to commercial real estate, hospitality/consumer-linked borrowers, and economic concentration.
  • Interest-rate and balance-sheet risk: Net interest income can be affected by repricing of assets and liabilities, deposit beta assumptions, and the composition of interest-earning assets.
  • Funding and liquidity pressure: Elevated deposit competition can raise the cost of deposits; disruptions to wholesale funding markets can constrain growth.
  • Regulatory and capital constraints: Changes to capital rules, stress testing expectations, or consumer compliance requirements can affect growth strategy and profitability.
  • Concentration risk: Geographic and industry concentrations can amplify outcomes versus diversified peers.
  • Operational and cybersecurity risk: As bank services digitize, threat exposure increases and can impose direct and indirect costs.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Community banks are commonly valued through a mix of price-to-book (especially tangible book), earnings power, and efficiency/credit quality signals rather than purely through high-growth multiples. Market expectations typically move with:

  • Quality of earnings: Sustainable NII generation and stable credit performance influence how much of current earnings is viewed as durable.
  • Net interest margin and balance-sheet positioning: The market often re-rates banks when its view of funding costs, asset yields, and deposit stability changes.
  • Tangible capital trajectory: Growth funded through retained earnings and disciplined risk-weighted assets affects valuation multiples.
  • Loss reserves adequacy and provisioning discipline: Clear reserve methodology and controlled charge-offs tend to reduce valuation discount.

In practice, investors tend to apply a valuation framework that rewards stable deposit franchise characteristics and conservative credit culture, while penalizing perceived risk in loan portfolios or funding structure.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

BMRC’s long-term investment case rests on the structural strengths typical of well-run community banks: a locally rooted deposit franchise that supports funding advantages, relationship-based customer stickiness, and a credit culture that can limit loss volatility across cycles. The central objective is to verify that deposit quality, underwriting discipline, and capital management remain consistent while the balance sheet navigates interest-rate environments and credit conditions.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for BMRC.

zacks.com2026-05-12

New Strong Sell Stocks for May 12th

AOS, BIDU and BMRC have been added to the Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) List on May 12th, 2026.

zacks.com2026-05-07

New Strong Sell Stocks for May 7th

BMRC, AB and AOS have been added to the Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) List on May 7, 2026.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-27

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-04-27

Bank of Marin (BMRC) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

The headline numbers for Bank of Marin (BMRC) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-04-27

Bank of Marin (BMRC) Misses Q1 Earnings Estimates

Bank of Marin (BMRC) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.53 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.56 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.3 per share a year ago.

businesswire.com2026-04-27

Bank of Marin Bancorp Reports First Quarter Financial Results

NOVATO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Bank of Marin Bancorp Reports First Quarter Financial Results; Further Improvements in Net Interest Margin and Asset Quality.

businesswire.com2026-04-02

Bank of Marin Bancorp to Webcast Q1 Earnings on Monday, April 27, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. PT

NOVATO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Bank of Marin Bancorp to Webcast Q1 Earnings on Monday, April 27, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. PT.

defenseworld.net2026-03-20

Analyzing First National of Nebraska (OTCMKTS:FINN) & Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ:BMRC)

Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ: BMRC - Get Free Report) and First National of Nebraska (OTCMKTS:FINN - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends. Volatility and Risk Bank

defenseworld.net2026-03-05

Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ:BMRC) Receives $30.10 Consensus Target Price from Analysts

Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ: BMRC - Get Free Report) has earned an average recommendation of "Moderate Buy" from the six research firms that are covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. Two analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, three have assigned a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the

defenseworld.net2026-02-19

United Security Bancshares (NASDAQ:UBFO) & Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ:BMRC) Head to Head Comparison

United Security Bancshares (NASDAQ: UBFO - Get Free Report) and Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ: BMRC - Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk. Analyst Ratings This is

defenseworld.net2026-02-08

Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ:BMRC) Receives $30.10 Consensus Price Target from Brokerages

Shares of Bank of Marin Bancorp (NASDAQ: BMRC - Get Free Report) have been assigned a consensus recommendation of "Moderate Buy" from the six analysts that are presently covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, three have assigned a buy rating and one has assigned a strong

zacks.com2026-02-05

Earnings Estimates Rising for Bank of Marin (BMRC): Will It Gain?

Bank of Marin (BMRC) shares have started gaining and might continue moving higher in the near term, as indicated by solid earnings estimate revisions.

seekingalpha.com2026-01-26

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-01-26

Bank of Marin (BMRC) Q4 Earnings: How Key Metrics Compare to Wall Street Estimates

The headline numbers for Bank of Marin (BMRC) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended December 2025, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-01-26

Bank of Marin (BMRC) Q4 Earnings and Revenues Top Estimates

Bank of Marin (BMRC) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.59 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.51 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.38 per share a year ago.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"BMRC reported Q1 2026 revenue of $42.8M and net income of $8.5M (EPS $0.53, net margin ~19.9%). On a QoQ basis, revenue fell from $79.3M in Q4 2025 (~-46.0%) while net income declined from $39.5M (~-78.5%). On a YoY basis, revenue rose from $19.6M in Q2 2025 (~+118.2%), and net income improved versus $-8.5M in Q2 2025 (turning positive; QoQ already showed stabilization from the prior quarter’s profit). Profitability improved meaningfully versus the Q2 2025 loss period; however, margins contracted sharply from Q4 2025 (net margin ~49.9% in Q4 to ~19.9% in Q1 2026). The company’s balance sheet remains resilient for a bank: total assets were $3.91B in Q1 2026, roughly flat QoQ (~$3.90B). Equity was stable at ~$394.5M (slightly down QoQ). Leverage appears modest with net debt still negative (net cash position). Cash flow fields are not provided for Q1 2026 (0 reported), so cash-flow quality can’t be validated this quarter. Shareholder returns are strong: price is up 29.9% over 1 year with a ~1.0% dividend yield. Total return therefore benefits from both momentum and income. Analyst sentiment looks constructive versus current price ($26.41): consensus target ~29.83 implies upside, with targets clustering near ~$29–$31."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Q1 2026 revenue declined QoQ (~-46.0% vs Q4 2025) but rose YoY versus Q2 2025 (~+118.2%), indicating volatile earnings power quarter-to-quarter.

Profitability

Positive

Net margin contracted from ~49.9% (Q4 2025) to ~19.9% (Q1 2026). Still, net income is positive in Q1 2026 vs a loss in Q2 2025, signaling recovery.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Q1 2026 cash flow metrics are reported as 0 (not usable), limiting assessment of cash conversion and free-cash generation this quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total assets ~ $3.91B and equity ~$394.5M are largely stable QoQ; net debt remains negative (net cash), supporting resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

1-year price momentum is strong (+29.91%) and dividend yield is ~0.98%, implying solid total shareholder return despite quarterly earnings volatility.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target ($29.83) is above the current ~$26.41 price (upside implied), with a high/low range of ~$29–$30.5 suggesting moderate-to-positive sentiment.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

BMRC’s Q1 2026 shows tangible earnings improvement anchored by (1) a 6 bps QoQ NIM rise (+47 bps YoY) from loan churn and repricing (new loans at ~40 bps higher average rate than payoffs) and (2) measurable credit cleanup. Nonaccruals fell from 1.27% of assets to 0.41% and classified loans declined from 1.51% to 0.85% after selling $16.3m of the oldest classified/nonaccrual notes with $7.3m in specific reserves validated by sale proceeds and charge-offs. Management framed the remaining large owner-occupied CRE as legally disputed but without loss expectations, while continuing to bifurcate CRE outlook (SF office negative history vs improving rest of Bay driven by AI-related investment). Q1 expenses ran ahead due to personnel accrual resets, FDIC insurance effects from repositioning, and a front-loaded charitable giving assumption; otherwise, expense should flatten. Guidance focuses on mid-3s NIM for the year and continued deposit cost management. Buybacks are still discretionary pending earned capital comfort.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Originated $81.0 million of new loans in Q1, $61.0 million funded (almost 30% YoY increase), with strongest first quarter in years driven by hires plus Greater Sacramento commercial real estate demand
  • Net interest margin expansion: +6 bps sequentially and +47 bps YoY, supported by loan repricing and churn (new loans booked ~40 bps higher than payoff rates)
  • Credit normalization via targeted exits: sold longest-tenure classified/nonaccrual loans totaling $16.3 million to validate reserves and reduce nonaccrual/classified levels

Business Development

  • Greater Sacramento relationship-based banking momentum: leadership changes post–American River Bank acquisition and incentive program adjustments driving more booked lending in Sacramento-linked relationships
  • High deposit opportunity: moved a portion of higher-cost deposits off balance sheet at quarter-end to a relatively high one-way sell rate (supported by Q2 continuation)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Net income $8.5 million; EPS $0.53
  • Net interest income increased to $30.3 million; NII benefited from average balance sheet growth, higher investment security yields, and reduced deposit costs
  • Net interest margin increased +6 bps QoQ; adjusted sequential NIM would have been +14 bps excluding the $667k/$670k Q4 interest recovery not repeated in Q1
  • Allowance for credit losses remained strong at 1.08% of total loans; no provision for credit losses in Q1 due to asset quality improvement and reserves already built
  • Nonaccrual loans declined from 1.27% of assets to 0.41%; classified-to-total loans fell from 1.51% to 0.85%
  • CET1/comparable capital ratios characterized as normalized post-restructure; Board declared dividend $0.25/share on April 23 (84th consecutive quarterly dividend)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No stock buyback activity in prior couple of quarters; management indicated buyback conversation may resume as risk within shed loans is lower, but they still want to earn into a higher ratio first
  • Dividend: $0.25/share declared (paid as declared April 23)
  • Deposits: total deposits increased in Q1; deposit cost reduction efforts underway, including targeted repricing and one-way sells to manage expensive funding

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Balance sheet repositioning continues: used one-way sell opportunity for certain deposit funds; management said opportunity persisted into Q2
  • Expense outlook: Q1 noninterest expense elevated by $2.5 million QoQ primarily from personnel-related accrual resets (payroll taxes, incentive compensation accruals, profit sharing, insurance, 401(k) matching), plus FDIC insurance expense and charitable giving
  • Charitable giving expected to comprise almost 70% of total 2026 in Q1; management expects normalization in subsequent quarters
  • Efficiency/tech: second year of technology/back-office efficiency strategies; AI positioned to build efficiencies and drive operating leverage
  • Portfolio guidance: higher desired mix toward C&I; multifamily deals targeted as CRA-qualified; construction group re-activating (“life in the construction market”)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Net interest margin outlook: full-year mid-3s NIM (mid-3s “still appropriate”); management expects a few bps per quarter and total NIM tailwinds from loan repricing and additional deposit repricing benefits to potentially reach mid-3s
  • Loan yields: new loan yield 5.91% in Q1 vs 5.51% for paid-off loans
  • Repricing cadence: ~17% of portfolio reprices over next 12 months; ~34% over next three years (stated as unchanged vs prior guidance)
  • Loan pricing discipline: loans priced ~200 over Treasury (or above, depending on type) meet ROA hurdles; management sees competitors bidding at ~150–175 bps over Treasury

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Competitive pricing compression: market aggressiveness with bids at ~150–175 bps over Treasury; management concerned about ROA hurdle coverage in compressed spread environment
  • Credit: wine industry under pressure (North Bay economic headwind); multifamily showing froth at times and increased competition around underwriting terms
  • Regulatory/capital framing: management reluctant to set a specific CET1 target; capital actions (including buybacks) depend on peer-relative capital needs vs reduced risk after shedding pandemic-era classified/nonaccrual loans
  • Nonaccrual resolution impacts growth: Q1 loan growth was negatively impacted by nonaccrual loan resolutions and elevated payoffs in acquired consumer portfolios (auto/mortgage), offset partially by repricing benefits

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Margin proof points and “terminal” levels: Management said full-year mid-3s NIM remains appropriate, driven by loan repricing tailwinds despite Q1 noise. They explained that the Q1 decline had Q4’s $667k/$670k interest-reversal absence and nonaccrual payoff effects, and that deposit repricing adds incremental bps.
  • Topic: Buyback timing after restructure/CET1 normalization: Management said they previously paused buybacks to earn back toward peer CET1/median leverage after regulator-backed restructure without equity raise. With credit risk from shed loans reduced, the hurdle lowered; they’re open to discussion but want to earn into a higher ratio before acting.
  • Topic: CRE credit bifurcation and loan resolution independence: Management distinguished pandemic pandemic-era notes sold (valuation-driven, charge-off avoidance) versus remaining ~$8m owner-occupied CRE in dispute over extension/renewal terms with adequate LTV/DST coverage and no loss expectations. They described SF office value degradation bottoming while outer Bay remains more stable.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BMRC Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for BMRC.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (BMRC)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Bank of Marin Bancorp (BMRC) Financial Profile