First Busey Corporation

First Busey Corporation (BUSE) Market Cap

First Busey Corporation has a market capitalization of โ€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: Van A. Dukeman

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1998-10-06

Website: https://www.busey.com

First Busey Corporation (BUSE) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

First Busey Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Busey Bank that provides retail and commercial banking products and services to individual, corporate, institutional, and governmental customers in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Banking, FirsTech, and Wealth Management. It offers customary types of demand and savings deposits; and commercial, agricultural, real estate construction, commercial and residential real estate, and consumer loans, as well as home equity lines of credit. The company also provides money transfer, safe deposit, IRA, and other fiduciary services through banking center, ATM and technology-based networks. In addition, it offers investment management, trust, estate advisory, and financial planning services, as well as business succession and employee retirement planning services; investment strategy consulting and fiduciary services; and security brokerage services. Further, the company provides asset management, philanthropic advisory, tax preparation, and professional farm management services; and commercial depository services, such as cash management services. Additionally, it offers payment technology solutions through its payment platform, such as walk-in payment processing for customers at retail pay agents; online bill payment solutions; customer service payments accepted over the telephone; mobile bill pay; direct debit services; electronic concentration of payments delivered to automated clearing house network; money management and credit card networks; and lockbox remittance processing to make payments by mail, as well as provides tools related to billing, reconciliation, bill reminders, and treasury services. The company has 46 banking centers in Illinois; 8 in Missouri; 3 in southwest Florida; and 1 in Indianapolis, Indiana. First Busey Corporation was founded in 1868 and is headquartered in Champaign, Illinois.

Analyst Sentiment

76%
Strong Buy

From 7 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $29.00

โ–ฒ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$28

Median

$29

High Bound

$30

Average

$29

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

๐ŸŽฏ Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$29.00
โ–ฒ +5.15% Upside
Low Target
$28.00
2% Risk
Median Target
$29.00
5% Mid
High Target
$30.00
9% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

๐Ÿ“˜ Full Research Report

โ„น๏ธ

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

๐Ÿ“˜ FIRST BUSEY CORP (BUSE) โ€” Investment Overview

๐Ÿงฉ Business Model Overview

FIRST BUSEY CORP operates as a community-focused regional bank with a customer base centered on commercial and retail banking relationships. The value chain is straightforward: the firm gathers deposits, allocates capital to loans and securities, and earns a spread between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. It supplements net interest income with fee-generating activities such as deposit-related services, lending fees, and wealth/asset-management offerings.

Customer stickiness is driven by relationship depth: businesses and households tend to consolidate cash management, lending, treasury services, and wealth needs with a small number of banksโ€”raising practical switching costs and supporting steadier funding and cross-sell opportunities.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

BUSEโ€™s monetisation is primarily anchored in net interest income, supported by:

  • Deposit franchise: interest expense is shaped by deposit pricing, mix (transaction vs. time deposits), and customer retention.
  • Asset yields: loan growth, portfolio mix (commercial, consumer, and real estate exposures), and securities deployment.

Non-interest income is a meaningful secondary driver and typically includes:

  • Service charges and transaction-related fees tied to account activity.
  • Wealth management / asset servicing, which can provide more recurring characteristics than purely transactional products.
  • Lending-related fees that fluctuate with origination volume and credit conditions.

Margin structure is influenced by the balance between deposit cost discipline and loan/asset yield, while operating leverage depends on expense control and scale in core banking operations.

๐Ÿง  Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat thesis (Financials: cost of deposits + regulatory and credit culture)

  • Cost of Deposits Advantage: A stable, relationship-based deposit base tends to reduce reliance on higher-cost wholesale funding. Lower marginal deposit costs can translate into stronger earning power through cycles.
  • Regulatory Moat: Banking is capital-constrained and compliance-intensive. Scale in risk management, governance, consumer protections, and capital planning raises barriers for new entrants and limits โ€œcopycatโ€ growth.
  • Credit Culture and Underwriting Discipline: Consistent underwriting standards and disciplined credit monitoring can reduce severity of losses during downturns and protect tangible capital.

Competitive benchmarking (industry peers for comparison):

  • Huntington Bancshares: competes more broadly across multiple midwestern markets, often with greater scale.
  • Old National Bancorp: regional competitor with a similar footprint and emphasis on relationship banking.
  • Wintrust Financial: regional competitor with strong middle-market and deposit-gathering capabilities in its served geographies.

BUSEโ€™s positioning emphasizes community and commercial relationship depth in its primary footprint, aiming to convert local banking relationships into resilient deposit funding and repeat business. While larger regional banks can compete aggressively on pricing and product breadth, BUSEโ€™s historical model relies on retention and disciplined risk selection rather than pure rate competitiveness.

๐Ÿš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5โ€“10 year horizon, growth is most likely to come from expansion of the installed customer base and balance-sheet efficiency, not from disruptive technology.

  • Organic customer growth: continued penetration of commercial banking and deposit relationships supported by relationship servicing and cross-sell.
  • Non-interest income deepening: scaling wealth/asset-related offerings and fee businesses that can diversify earnings away from purely interest-rate-driven dynamics.
  • Credit-led asset selection: disciplined underwriting that enables steady loan growth when market pricing for risk becomes attractive.
  • Operational efficiency and digital enablement: investment in core infrastructure and service delivery can improve productivity while preserving customer experienceโ€”supporting better operating leverage.

TAM expansion is rooted in the bankable economic activity of its served markets: small-to-mid sized enterprises, professionals, and household financial needs (payments, lending, treasury, and wealth). As these customers grow, a relationship bank can grow with them.

โš  Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit cycle risk: adverse economic conditions can raise loan losses, particularly in segments exposed to commercial real estate, small business stress, or consumer credit deterioration.
  • Interest rate risk: earnings sensitivity to funding costs and asset repricing can compress margins when deposit pricing rises faster than asset yields.
  • Liquidity and funding competition: competition for deposits can pressure cost of funds and tighten spreads; wholesale funding reliance can increase stress in adverse periods.
  • Regulatory and capital requirements: higher capital constraints or supervisory changes can limit growth and influence profitability.
  • Operational and cybersecurity risk: financial institutions remain targets; successful controls are essential for sustaining trust and preventing loss events.

๐Ÿ“Š Valuation & Market View

Regional banks are typically valued on a mix of earnings power and balance-sheet quality, with market focus often revolving around:

  • Tangible book value and tangible book growth (capital generation capacity).
  • Return on equity driven by operating efficiency and credit performance.
  • Credit quality indicators (loss rates, problem loan trends, and charge-off trajectory).
  • Deposit franchise strength (deposit costs, stability, and funding mix).

Multiple expansion tends to follow improving confidence in sustained deposit economics, resilient credit outcomes, and credible operating leverage. De-rating typically follows widening credit concerns, persistent margin compression, or capital constraints.

๐Ÿ” Investment Takeaway

BUSE fits a โ€œquality regional bankโ€ profile built on three durable pillars: a deposit cost advantage supported by relationship banking, a regulatory and compliance moat that raises barriers to entry, and a credit culture oriented toward disciplined underwriting. The multi-year opportunity is primarily organic balance-sheet growth and earnings diversification through fee and wealth-related activities, tempered by the inherent risks of credit cycles, interest-rate sensitivity, and regulatory capital requirements.


โš  AI-generated โ€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

๐Ÿ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"BUSE reported Q1โ€™26 revenue of $267.8M and net income of $50.0M (EPS $0.56). On a YoY basis, revenue declined -29.2% vs Q1โ€™25 ($188.0M), while net income improved from a loss of -$30.0M to +$50.0M (income turnaround; YoY change not meaningfully expressed as a growth rate). QoQ, revenue fell -3.6% vs Q4โ€™25 ($277.8M), and net income decreased -17.7% vs Q4โ€™25 ($60.8M). Profitability improved meaningfully over the last year: net margin rose to 18.7% in Q1โ€™26 from -15.9% in Q1โ€™25, and gross margin expanded to 72.1% from 43.9%. However, there was some near-term cooling QoQ: net margin contracted from 21.9% in Q4โ€™25 to 18.7% in Q1โ€™26, with operating margin moving down as well (27.9% to 23.8%). Cash flow disclosures for Q1โ€™26 appear inconsistent (net cash from operations reported as $0 and cash at period end as $0), so cash flow quality for this quarter is not reliable from the dataset. Balance sheet resilience remains strong: total assets were $18.0B with stable equity at $2.41B, and leverage is moderate (net debt $338M). Shareholder returns look supportiveโ€”shares are up 34.9% over the last year (and 21.6% over 6 months), with a modest dividend yield (~1.0%) contributing to total return potential. Analyst consensus target is $29 vs $26.98 last price (~7.5% upside)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue declined -29.2% YoY (Q1โ€™26: $267.8M vs Q1โ€™25: $188.0M) and -3.6% QoQ (vs Q4โ€™25: $277.8M), indicating slowing top-line momentum.

Profitability

Good

Net income improved from -$30.0M in Q1โ€™25 to +$50.0M in Q1โ€™26; net margin expanded to 18.7% from -15.9%. QoQ profitability softened (net margin 21.9% in Q4โ€™25 to 18.7% in Q1โ€™26), suggesting margins are contracting slightly near term.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Q1โ€™26 cash flow line items appear unreliable in the dataset (net operating cash flow shown as 0; cash at period end shown as 0). Prior quarters showed positive operating cash flow, but Q1โ€™26 cannot be cleanly validated here.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Total assets were $18.0B in Q1โ€™26 with equity of $2.41B (relatively stable vs Q4โ€™25). Leverage is manageable (net debt ~$338M; total debt ~$627M).

Shareholder Returns

Good

Strong momentum: +34.9% 1y_change and +21.6% 6m_change. Dividend yield is modest (~1.0%), so total shareholder return is primarily driven by price appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target $29 vs $26.98 implies ~7.5% upside. Valuation metrics are not fully contextualized without broader comps, but sentiment appears constructive given price targets.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
ยฉ 2026 Stock Market Info โ€” First Busey Corporation (BUSE) Financial Profile