Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) Market Cap

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. has a market capitalization of $567.9M.

Price: $32.44

-0.28 (-0.86%)

Market Cap: 567.95M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Gary Bowman

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Engineering & Construction

IPO Date: 2021-05-07

Website: https://www.bowman.com

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 567.95M|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. provides a range of real estate, energy, infrastructure, and environmental management solutions in the United States. It offers civil and site engineering services, such as conceptual land planning, environmental consulting and permitting, planning/zoning and entitlements, roadway and highway designs, erosion and sediment designs, stormwater management designs, construction administration, traffic studies, floodplain studies, and utility relocation designs; and commissioning and energy efficiency services comprise construction observation, direct systems functional performance testing, system development readiness checklist, post occupancy review, review of construction documents, deferred/seasonal functional testing, final commissioning report, and commissioning review of submittals. The company also provides construction management services, including constructability review, value engineering, budgeting and cost estimating, interagency and utility coordination, onsite observation and report evaluation, public communication and outreach, and resident engineer services, as well as bid solicitation, documentation, and preparation services; and environmental consulting services consisting of wetlands and waters of the U.S. delineations, natural resources inventories, wildlife and vegetation surveys, threatened and endangered species surveys, endangered species conservation and management, wetland creation and enhancement design, NEPA documentation, section 404/401 permitting and compliance, NPDES permitting, and phase I environmental site assessment. In addition, it offers landscape architecture, land procurement and right-of-way acquisition, structural engineering, surveying and geospatial engineering, and transportation and water resources engineering services, as well as mechanical, electrical, and plumbing engineering services. Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.

Analyst Sentiment

88%
Strong Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $58.00

▲ +78.8% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$58

Median

$58

High Bound

$58

Average

$58

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$58.00
▲ +78.79% Upside
Low Target
$58.00
79% Risk
Median Target
$58.00
79% Mid
High Target
$58.00
79% Max
Consensus
Buy
6 / 7 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)568468545694470346408398501
Enterprise Value ($M)807707680849626493552530618
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)50.41-31.6069.2627.4819.55-49.6217.27129.12-60.19
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)29.798.512.4114.31-5.95
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.133.704.225.513.853.063.603.504.80
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.131.872.092.651.881.421.661.642.13
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)17.8850.2266.9268.59112.3331.4944.3960.56183.55
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)5.595.286.745.134.364.874.655.92
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)16.2757.3260.1783.5739.5964.7659.9468.44107.88
Debt to Equity Ratio4.821.000.560.650.690.640.610.590.60

BWMN Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$32.44
Intrinsic Value$32.40
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 0.1%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 3%3%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.08B
Perpetuity TV Value$1.43B
Discounted TV (PV)$0.60B
TV Weighting %59.3%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP LTD (BWMN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd is a professional services firm that delivers engineering, environmental, surveying, and related technical consulting to public- and private-sector clients across infrastructure, land development, and energy-adjacent end markets. The value chain is project-based: Bowman develops scope and technical plans, performs field and analytical work (often requiring specialized personnel and regulatory compliance), and produces deliverables that enable construction permits, design approvals, and execution. Revenue is generated through recurring client relationships and follow-on work tied to repeat projects, where Bowman’s familiarity with a site, permitting history, and engineering specifications increases the likelihood of re-engagement.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily project and fee-based, with monetization driven by billable consulting hours, fieldwork execution, and technical deliverables. Contract structures typically include fixed-fee or time-and-materials components, with margin influenced by (i) utilization of technical labor, (ii) the ability to manage scope and change orders, (iii) mix of subcontracting versus in-house execution, and (iv) overhead leverage as demand expands. While much of the work is transactional, the business often benefits from “repeatability” in its operating model—ongoing programs, retainer-like support on specific initiatives, and follow-on studies tied to longer project lifecycles.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Bowman’s moat is best characterized as a combination of switching costs (technical/know-how lock-in and permitting/site familiarity), intangible assets (expert teams, safety/compliance track record, and documented deliverable quality), and local execution capability (proximity to project sites and established relationships with key decision makers).

For benchmarking, Bowman competes with:

  • WSP Global — broader global platform with deep resources across many sectors.
  • Stantec — strong multidisciplinary footprint, often winning large, multi-disciplinary programs.
  • Englobe — notable presence in environmental and geotechnical services in Canada.

Relative positioning: large-cap competitors (WSP, Stantec) can outbid on scale and breadth for major programs, while Bowman can emphasize responsiveness, hands-on technical delivery, and continuity on site-specific engagements where relationship depth and execution quality matter. Against specialist rivals (e.g., Englobe), Bowman’s advantage is often the ability to serve clients across adjacent technical needs (engineering + environmental + surveying), reducing coordination friction for customers and supporting cross-sell into follow-on scope.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, Bowman’s addressable market should expand with infrastructure and mobility investment, growing regulatory and permitting complexity, and the ongoing need for site characterization and technical studies for development and energy-related projects. Key structural drivers include:

  • Infrastructure replacement and expansion: design, studies, and engineering services tied to transportation, utilities, and public works.
  • Environmental and compliance demand: heightened scrutiny and evolving standards that require specialized environmental and technical due diligence.
  • Urbanization and land development: increased surveying, geotechnical, and engineering support for constrained and complex sites.
  • Energy transition enabling work: broader technical activity surrounding grid upgrades, industrial site development, and permitting-intensive projects.

The TAM expands not only with construction activity, but also with the “work per project” embedded in approvals, safety requirements, and technical documentation—conditions that structurally favor firms that maintain strong field execution and compliance capabilities.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • End-market cyclicality: professional services demand can soften when public budgets or private development pipelines slow.
  • Project execution and margin risk: fixed-fee contracts, scope growth, field complications, or delayed approvals can compress profitability.
  • Professional liability exposure: claims related to design, environmental work, or surveying accuracy can create financial and reputational risk.
  • Labor availability and wage inflation: sustained shortages of qualified engineers and field specialists can raise costs and affect delivery timelines.
  • Competitive procurement dynamics: larger firms can pressure pricing on major tenders, while specialist competitors may win niche scope with lower overhead.

These risks are structural to the industry; underwriting quality, backlog composition, and disciplined contract management are the primary mitigants to monitor.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value professional services firms on a blend of profitability and cash-generation quality rather than on high-growth multiples. Common frameworks include EV/EBITDA and P/E, with emphasis on operating margin durability, utilization dynamics, and the visibility of earned revenue (often proxied by backlog and repeatable client relationships). Key valuation drivers include: the stability of gross margins, the ability to convert revenue growth into free cash flow, and demonstrated execution discipline that limits cost overruns and legal contingencies.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Bowman’s long-term investment case rests on defensible technical capability and customer stickiness in permitting- and site-specific engagements—an environment where relationship depth and deliverable quality create meaningful switching costs. While the industry remains exposed to infrastructure and development cycles, Bowman’s positioning as a multidisciplinary technical provider supports follow-on work and cross-scope wins, offering a rational path to sustained compounding if execution quality and labor productivity remain intact.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for BWMN.

globenewswire.com2026-06-02

Bowman Secures Significant Mining-Related Awards

Awards demonstrate continued strength of demand in infrastructure planning for precious mineral mining and processing Awards demonstrate continued strength of demand in infrastructure planning for precious mineral mining and processing

globenewswire.com2026-05-21

Bowman to Attend June Investor Conferences

RESTON, Va., May 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, announced it will participate in two investor conferences in June:

globenewswire.com2026-05-19

Bowman Selected to Lead Waterside Infrastructure Design for PhilaPort's $50 Million Cruise Terminal Capital Program

RESTON, Va., May 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, today announced it is working with the Port of Philadelphia (“PhilaPort”) to lead the waterside design, permitting and construction-phase services for the development of a cruise terminal facility on Hog Island.

zacks.com2026-05-13

BWMN or ULS: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Investors looking for stocks in the Business - Services sector might want to consider either Bowman Consulting (BWMN) or UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks?

zacks.com2026-05-08

Buy 5 Low-Leverage Stocks as Hope Fades for End to US-Iran Conflict

Oil-price volatility and fading US-Iran trade hopes are driving investors toward low-leverage stocks like PLOW.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-06

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-06

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) Upgraded to Buy: Here's Why

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), reflecting growing optimism about the company's earnings prospects. This might drive the stock higher in the near term.

zacks.com2026-05-06

Implied Volatility Surging for Bowman Consulting Stock Options

Investors need to pay close attention to BWMN stock based on the movements in the options market lately.

zacks.com2026-05-05

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) Q1 Earnings and Revenues Lag Estimates

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.14 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.21 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.07 per share a year ago.

zacks.com2026-05-05

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

The headline numbers for Bowman Consulting (BWMN) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

globenewswire.com2026-05-05

Bowman Reports Results for First Quarter 2026; Guidance Raise Indicates Over 20% Revenue Growth for 2026

RESTON, Va., May 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2026.

globenewswire.com2026-05-04

Bowman Acquires Nevada-based Smith & Associates Land Surveying

RESTON, Va., May 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, today announced it has acquired Smith & Associates Land Surveying, LLC, a Las Vegas, Nevada-based land surveying firm with more than three decades of experience supporting regional land development and infrastructure projects.

globenewswire.com2026-04-21

Bowman to Attend May Investor Conferences

RESTON, Va., April 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, announced it will participate in two investor conferences in May:

globenewswire.com2026-04-15

Bowman Awarded $4.9 Million Contract to Lead Construction Engineering & Inspection for Major Wastewater Treatment Expansion

RESTON, Va., April 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWMN), a national engineering services and program management firm, has been awarded a $4.9 million contract by Collier County, Florida to lead construction engineering and inspection (CEI) for the expansion of the Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant.

defenseworld.net2026-04-13

Comparing Cintas (NASDAQ:CTAS) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN)

Cintas (NASDAQ: CTAS - Get Free Report) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ: BWMN - Get Free Report) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership. Profitability This table compares Cintas and Bowman

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"BWMN reported Q1 2026 results with Revenue = $0 and Net Income = -$3.70M (EPS -$0.22). Compared with Q4 2025, Revenue data is not presented (Q4 revenue was $129.0M) while profitability deteriorated: Q4 2025 had Net Income of +$1.97M, so EPS moved from +0.11 to -0.22. Versus Q1 2025, Revenue was $112.9M and Net Income was -$1.74M, meaning losses widened: Net Income decreased by -$1.96M YoY (approximately -112.5% YoY). Over the last four quarters, the profitability trend was volatile—Q2–Q3 2025 were solidly profitable (Net Income +$6.01M to +$6.62M), but Q1 2025 and now Q1 2026 show negative results. Margins in Q1 2026 are effectively not interpretable from the dataset (no gross/revenue values), but the company’s operating performance at the bottom line weakened materially. Cash flow remains constructive despite the accounting loss: Q1 2026 Operating Cash Flow = +$11.6M and Free Cash Flow = +$9.6M, with continued buybacks (-$9.23M) and no dividends. Balance sheet leverage is moderate: Total Assets = $589.8M and Equity = $250.9M; debt remains meaningful with Net Debt = $130.5M. Total shareholder returns are supportive: the stock is up +45.1% over 1 year, which should materially offset weak near-term earnings momentum. Analyst valuation context shows a $50 consensus target versus $31.82 price (implied upside)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Latest quarter revenue is reported as $0, so directionality/trend cannot be assessed reliably. Versus Q1 2025 revenue of $112.9M, this represents a sharp deterioration in reported revenue.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income worsened to -$3.70M in Q1 2026 from +$1.97M in Q4 2025 (EPS 0.11 to -0.22) and from -$1.74M in Q1 2025 (loss widened ~-112% YoY). Profitability is volatile, with margins effectively not computable in Q1 2026 due to missing revenue/margins in the dataset.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Despite losses, operating cash flow was positive at +$11.6M and free cash flow +$9.6M in Q1 2026. No dividends; buybacks continued (-$9.23M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Balance sheet is stable: total assets of $589.8M and equity of $250.9M. Leverage remains meaningful with net debt of $130.5M, but equity provides a cushion versus prior quarters.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Stock momentum is strong with +45.1% 1-year price change. Buybacks occurred in Q1 2026, while dividends are zero.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus price target is $50 versus a current price of $31.82, implying upside. However, near-term earnings deterioration tempers conviction.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Bowman delivered strong Q1 momentum with double-digit growth across gross contract revenue ($126.5M, +12% YoY), net service billing ($114.2M, +14% YoY), and adjusted EBITDA ($16.8M, ~+16%), expanding adjusted EBITDA margin to 14.7%. Management raised 2026 guidance to $520M–$540M net revenue and 17.25%–17.75% adjusted EBITDA margin, citing record backlog of ~$653M and resilient demand across Power, Transportation, and Natural Resources, with data centers now a >6% revenue contributor. Key moving parts are mix and subcost-driven net-to-gross pressure (expected decline of ~3–5 points) versus revenue ramp that should offset Q1’s overhead drag (~50 bps). Q&A emphasized a large NDA government award (~$177M not-to-exceed, 36 months) expected to affect the second half 2026 and into 2027, and clarified that organic billing growth is volume/capacity and wallet-share driven rather than pricing. Overall, outlook is constructive but margin remains sensitive to staffing/utilization timing.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Power was fastest-growing sector: 37% gross revenue growth YoY (Power mix up to 28%).
  • Natural Resources organic net service billing growth: 16% YoY, with backlog mix expected to shift upward due to a new large award being reclassified.
  • Data center activities more than doubled to a bit over 6% of revenue, with continued resource reallocation every week to handle incremental data center workload.

Business Development

  • New large government contract: ~$177 million not-to-exceed value, 36-month term, expected to impact the second half of 2026 and into 2027; NDA limits disclosure.
  • Smith & Associates Land Surveying in Las Vegas acquisition: adds talent/production capability to an existing big client in that geography and expands broader geographic presence; described as a production capability play tied to a client demanding more work.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q1 gross contract revenue: $126.5M (+12% YoY).
  • Net-to-gross ratio: 90% in Q1; management expects net-to-gross to come down by ~3 to 5 points due to new awards/new service lines with higher subcost ratios.
  • Net service billing: $114.2M (+14% YoY); organic growth: 6% YoY.
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $16.8M (up nearly 16% YoY) with margin expanding to 14.7% YoY.
  • GAAP loss: $3.7M, including noncash amortization of acquired intangibles, acquisition-related expenses, financing costs, CEO transition items.
  • Overhead as % of revenue: up ~50 bps YoY, driven by slow start in Jan/Feb and Q2 mobilization costs; emerging growth company status exit adds incremental costs in 2026 that normalize in 2027.
  • SG&A: management cited an increase of ~730 bps plus to 57.8% vs last year for SG&A% of gross contract revenue (allocation methodology considerations noted).
  • Cash flow: $11.6M cash from operations (~70% conversion of adjusted EBITDA to cash); no deferred R&D tax adjustments on cash flow.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: ~$9.2M during Q1.
  • Revolving credit facility expanded to $250M to support higher CapEx for geospatial/data capture/automation investments and acquisitions.
  • CapEx: big fund spending on geospatial and data collection assets represented about half of CapEx in the quarter; additional ~$1M of OpEx not added back to adjusted EBITDA.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Technology/automation stance: management argues AI will not drive unsustainable pricing compression; focus is on higher-value deliverables and better execution rather than cannibalizing unit value.
  • Proprietary tools: >25 proprietary tools introduced to operations; additional capabilities include an integrated operating environment connecting internal systems and client-facing data after operationalization.
  • Pricing/margins: asserts most assignments are fixed fee or not-to-exceed; value-based compensation tied to life-cycle outcomes reduces risk of purely hourly billing displacement.
  • Operational constraint management: backlog conversion requires real-time staffing; management expects margin impacts as labor ramps for large contract, with labor utilization as a key driver of quarterly margin movement.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Raised 2026 guidance: net revenue to $520M–$540M (implies >20% revenue growth).
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin guidance: 17.25%–17.75%.
  • Revenue cadence expectation: remaining 3 quarters build on each other; Q3 expected at/near midpoint of Q2 and Q4.
  • Full-year bridging assumptions: ~60% of expected revenue supported by existing backlog; ~$250M supported by backlog and ~$170M delivered through new bookings within the year; just under 0.7x book-to-burn to beat guidance; book-to-burn remains manageable and positioned to exceed 1x consistently.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Net-to-gross headwind: management expects net-to-gross to decline by ~3 to 5 points from higher subcost ratio awards/service lines.
  • Margin volatility risk: staffing-up and notice-to-proceed timing can create a “roller coaster” effect; Q1 drag acknowledged from labor not as productive yet.
  • Permitting pace: permitting is “generally the same,” with only hints that others may want faster movement; management has not seen material shift (with hope for potential future NEPA-related permitting shifts).
  • AI/compression narrative risk: company must continue to defend against market assumptions of AI-driven commoditization and margin compression.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Government contract disclosure/cadence: Management confirmed NDA limitations but inferred a ~5-point lower-than-average net-to-gross (implied ~75% net-to-gross), higher-than-average gross spread, and stated the award has ~36-month term and ~$177M not-to-exceed value. Impact expected in the second half 2026 into 2027.
  • Margin improvement mechanics: Management linked Q1’s overhead drag to revenue cadence and overhead multipliers, stating it is confident margins will exceed full-year guide. Bruce said achieving higher-margin contribution in Q2–Q4 is sufficient because incremental machine support is not a zero-sum tradeoff versus fixed overhead.
  • Organic growth drivers and SG&A/efficiency via AI: Management said organic growth is from increased workload/workforce utilization and wallet share, not pricing (0% contribution from pricing). For SG&A, management cited ~50 bps higher SG&A% YoY, and technology tools are intended to improve front-office/client engagement efficiency more than back-office cost cuts.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BWMN Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for BWMN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (BWMN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) Financial Profile