Campbell Soup Company

Campbell Soup Company (CPB) Market Cap

Campbell Soup Company has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Mick J. Beekhuizen

Sector: Consumer Defensive

Industry: Packaged Foods

IPO Date: 1954-12-13

Website: https://www.thecampbellscompany.com

Campbell Soup Company (CPB) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Consumer Defensive

Company Profile

Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is a leading international producer and marketer of a wide variety of food and beverage products. The enterprise conducts its business through two main operational divisions: Meals & Beverages and Snacks. The Meals & Beverages segment serves both retail and food service industries throughout the United States and Canada. Its extensive product range includes classic Campbell's condensed and ready-to-enjoy soups; Swanson brand broths and stocks; Pacific Foods' line of broths, soups, and non-dairy beverages; Prego pasta sauces; Pace brand Mexican sauces; Campbell's gravies, pasta dishes, beans, and dinner sauces; Swanson canned poultry; Plum organic baby food and snacks; V8 juices and drinks; and Campbell's tomato juice. The Snacks division primarily targets the retail sector, with a significant presence in Latin America. This segment offers a diverse array of treats, such as Pepperidge Farm's selection of cookies, crackers, fresh bakery items, and frozen goods, including Milano cookies and Goldfish crackers. Other notable brands within this category are Snyder's of Hanover pretzels, Lance sandwich crackers, Cape Cod and Kettle Brand potato chips, Late July snacks, Snack Factory Pretzel Crisps, Pop Secret popcorn, Emerald nuts, and numerous other snacking options. Campbell Soup Company employs a comprehensive distribution strategy, selling its merchandise across an extensive network that encompasses major retail food chains, mass discounters and merchandisers, club stores, convenience stores, drug stores, and dollar stores. Additionally, products are available via e-commerce platforms, various other retail, commercial, and non-commercial establishments, and a system of independent contractor distributors. Established in 1869, the company's corporate headquarters are situated in Camden, New Jersey.

Analyst Sentiment

38%
Underperform

From 20 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $20.67

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$17

Median

$20

High Bound

$28

Average

$21

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$20.67
▼ -5.96% Upside
Low Target
$17.00
-23% Risk
Median Target
$20.00
-9% Mid
High Target
$28.00
27% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 CAMPBELL SOUP (CPB) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Campbell Soup operates in the U.S. and international consumer packaged goods (“CPG”) value chain: it sources food ingredients, manufactures shelf-stable and refrigerated products, and sells to large retailers, wholesalers, and foodservice customers. The economic model depends on (1) efficient, high-utilization production across branded and private-label SKUs, (2) distribution reach and trading relationships that secure shelf and promotional access, and (3) mix management to sustain gross margin through pricing, cost productivity, and formulation strategies.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by branded packaged foods and, to a meaningful extent, private-label and contracted supply. Monetisation follows a typical staples pattern: a large portion of demand is repeat purchase at the household level, supporting stable baseline volumes, while incremental profitability is earned through margin discipline.

  • Branded packaged foods: Monetises consumer preference and retailer shelf placement; margin sensitivity to input costs (e.g., vegetables, protein, packaging).
  • Private label / store brands: Monetises manufacturing capability and supply reliability; typically lower gross margin but supports utilization and volume stability.
  • Foodservice and international channels: Provides additional volume opportunities and mix benefits, though margins can vary by customer contracting terms.

Key margin drivers include manufacturing efficiency (cost per unit), procurement and co-packing advantages, packaging and freight management, and the ability to offset commodity inflation through pricing and product mix.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Campbell Soup’s competitive position is rooted less in network effects and more in scale/distribution leverage and cost advantages in manufacturing and procurement, complemented by intangible assets (established brands and product formulations) that support consumer trust and retailer shelf commitment.

  • Scale/Distribution leverage: Broad retailer presence and category management relationships allow Campbell to defend placement and execute mix/pricing strategies across a large SKU portfolio.
  • Manufacturing cost advantages: Multi-plant production and continuous operational focus supports unit-cost competitiveness and flexibility across branded and private-label demand.
  • Intangible assets: Trusted product identities and established recipes reduce perceived substitution risk versus smaller challengers, supporting stable demand even when promotional intensity rises.

Competitive benchmarking (primary competitors):

  • General Mills (Progresso, among other meal solutions): Competes in adjacent packaged soup and meal categories, often emphasizing brand extensions and consumer-facing marketing.
  • Conagra Brands (e.g., frozen/meal and pantry categories): Competes via portfolio breadth across meal solutions, sometimes reallocating promotional spend across categories.
  • Unilever (Knorr and related global soup/seasoning franchises): Participates through strong international brands and seasoning-led meal solutions, with different regional demand drivers.

Campbell’s positioning differs in its sustained focus on condensed/shelf-stable soup heritage combined with a scalable manufacturing base and a value-engineering approach that supports both branded and private-label supply—an advantage when retailer mix shifts or promotional intensity compresses industry pricing.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Category demand for convenient, at-home meal solutions: Long-run structural preference for quick preparation supports baseline volumes in soup and meal categories.
  • Premiumization and formulation-based differentiation: Product innovation aligned to nutrition (e.g., sodium reduction, protein-forward variants, and better-for-you positioning) can improve mix and reduce reliance on price-only growth.
  • Retail and e-commerce share capture: Ability to maintain availability and manage assortment supports growth where distribution channels increasingly reward reliable supply and SKU rationalization.
  • Utilization-led profitability: Leveraging production capacity across branded and private-label demand can improve returns on fixed manufacturing costs over a full cycle.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is more likely to be driven by mix and category share than by unit volume expansion, consistent with mature CPG market dynamics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity and input-cost volatility: Changes in agricultural inputs and packaging costs can pressure gross margins if pricing power lags inflation.
  • Retailer bargaining power and promotion intensity: Large customers can increase promotional requirements, demand co-investment, or shift mix toward private label.
  • Private-label substitution: Store brands can compress branded margins, especially when consumer trade-down becomes more pronounced.
  • Regulatory and labeling/sodium targets: Compliance costs and formulation changes can affect product economics and innovation timelines.
  • Food safety and quality events: Operational risks can lead to recalls, reputational damage, and incremental costs.
  • Currency and international execution: International exposure can introduce FX volatility and channel-specific margin variation.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for consumer staples companies like Campbell is typically anchored to earnings durability and cash generation, often expressed through EV/EBITDA and earnings multiples rather than revenue growth-based metrics. Key valuation sensitivities include:

  • Gross margin trajectory: Input costs and pricing/mix effectiveness move the multiple and influence perceived earnings quality.
  • Volume stability: Mature category stability supports a premium versus cyclical food peers, provided promotional intensity remains controlled.
  • Free cash flow conversion: Working capital management and capex discipline influence valuation through cash-return capacity.
  • Capital allocation credibility: Dividend and buyback execution can support shareholder returns when earnings growth is modest.

In this sector, markets typically reward evidence of sustained unit-cost control, resilient demand, and disciplined capital allocation rather than aggressive top-line expansion assumptions.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Campbell Soup offers an evergreen staples profile supported by manufacturing and procurement efficiency, scale/distribution leverage, and intangible brand/formulation assets that help defend demand through retailer and promotional cycles. The investment thesis is strongest when execution maintains gross margin resilience (cost control and mix), sustains distribution placement, and limits branded-versus-private-label erosion—positioning CPB to generate dependable cash flows over a full business cycle.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-05-03

"Headline (2026-05-03, Q3): Revenue $2.37B; Net income $124M; Diluted EPS $0.41 (reported EPS $0.42). YoY (vs 2025-04-27): Revenue fell from $2.48B to $2.37B (-4.4% YoY) and Net income rose from $66M to $124M (+87.9% YoY), indicating a meaningful profitability rebound. QoQ (vs 2026-02-01/Q2): Revenue declined from $2.56B to $2.37B (-7.7% QoQ) while Net income decreased from $145M to $124M (-14.5% QoQ). Margins: Gross margin eased slightly (27.96% in Q2 → 27.47% in Q3) while net profit margin declined from 5.65% (Q2) to 5.24% (Q3). On the full YoY comparison, net margin expanded materially (2.67% in Q3’25 → 5.24% in Q3’26). Cash flow & capital returns: Operating cash flow was $100M and free cash flow was $30M in Q3. Dividends paid were $117M (consistent across quarters), supporting shareholder yield; buybacks were not evident in Q3 (0 reported). Balance sheet shows equity stability around ~$4.0B, but leverage remains elevated with net debt about $6.6B. Total shareholder returns: Market price is $20.99, with -43.0% 1-year change, which detracts from total return despite the dividend."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue declined -7.7% QoQ ($2.56B → $2.37B) and -4.4% YoY ($2.48B → $2.37B), suggesting demand/volume pressure versus prior-year comps.

Profitability

Positive

Net income surged +87.9% YoY ($66M → $124M) even as gross margin eased QoQ (27.96% → 27.47%). Net margin improved strongly YoY (2.67% → 5.24%) but contracted QoQ (5.65% → 5.24%).

Cash Flow Quality

Fair

Q3 operating cash flow was $100M and free cash flow $30M, weaker than Q2. Dividends remain sizable ($117M) and appear consistently funded, but coverage is tighter in the latest quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Equity is relatively stable (~$4.03B in Q3) but leverage remains high (net debt ~$6.61B; total assets ~$15.14B). Liquidity ratios softened (current ratio 0.87; cash ratio 0.14).

Shareholder Returns

Caution

Dividend yield is modest (~1.9%), and Q3 buybacks were not reported. Total return is constrained by weak price performance (-43% 1y).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Street target consensus is ~$21.67 versus $20.99 current (slight upside). Price momentum is poor, which typically implies valuation support is not fully reflected.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

CPB’s Q3 2026 call centers on cost pressure into FY27 and a manufacturing/portfolio simplification plan to stabilize Snacks profitability. Sequential EBIT margin improved in Snacks from just over 7% to about 10% in Q3, but remains roughly 400 bps below prior year in both Q2 and Q3, showing the improvement is not yet fixing the underlying profitability gap. Management’s FY27 inflation framework is 5%–6% total if oil remains around $100/bbl: ~3% baseline plus +2% to 3% incremental from the Middle East conflict and knock-on logistics/input impacts (diesel/driver shortage, aluminum, fertilizer). Mitigation levers include elevated productivity, accelerating the announced $100M SG&A takeout, aggressive working-capital reduction, and RGM discipline—shifting away from low-ROI TPRs to feature-in-display programs, plus potential surgical pricing. Q4 net sales are framed flattish to slightly up, with Rao’s aided by a Sovos ERP timing lap and partial La Regina co-man margin benefits; tariff refunds are ~$0.03–$0.04 EPS in Q4 but managed as offsetting costs rather than upside.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Meals & Beverages: at-home cooking consumer trend expected to remain resilient; ongoing growth supported across cooking soups and Rao's, plus Pacific
  • Rao's/ Pacific innovation pipeline expected to support Q4 net sales with “exciting innovation, primarily on soups and sauces”
  • Snacks: Goldfish “core” stabilized over the past 2 quarters; management intends to continue incremental fuel behind it and drive back to growth
  • Pepperidge Farm: operational progress framed as improving execution and supporting improved performance going forward
  • Condensed sauces innovation next fiscal year (about 50%+ of condensed soup portfolio used as cooking ingredient), targeting flavor expansion for scratch-style meals

Business Development

  • Rao’s La Regina acquisition referenced as becoming partially reflected in Q4 P&L (co-man margin benefit); also tied to tariff refund direct piece
  • Tariff refund process involves vendors receiving refunds on CPB’s behalf (second, smaller component) with timing likely rolling into next year

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Snacks EBIT margin improved sequentially: ~7%+ in Q2 to ~10% in Q3, largely driven by lower trade spend and lower marketing YoY versus Q2
  • Despite sequential improvement, both Q2 and Q3 were still down ~400 bps year-over-year (management says “not acceptable”)
  • Organic net sales outlook for Q4: flattish to slightly up; management’s “lower end” assumption referenced as about minus 1% to minus 2% net sales
  • Q4 noise driver: ERP conversion from Sovos affecting Rao’s; incremental negative impact in Q3 expected to reverse in Q4 with a “$30 million lap” coming into Q4
  • RGM contribution: marketing and selling expected up slightly in Q4; marketing shift from Q3 to Q4 described
  • Share count mechanical impact: GAAP requires including about 7 million shares from La Regina acquisition, raising share count from ~299 million to ~306 million for full year
  • Q4 tariff refund projected impact: ~$0.03 to $0.04 per share; described as offsetting higher fuel/driver shortage and Iran-conflict impacts (tariff refund magnitude framed as net neutral-ish in EPS effect)
  • Co-man margin benefit in Q4: ~70 to 80 bps for the first time as La Regina becomes in financials

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Dividend: stated no intention to increase anytime soon; dividend rate balanced with efforts to reduce leverage quickly
  • Leverage target: management aiming to get back down to the “low 3s” over the next couple of years (stabilize earnings and grow profitability first)
  • Working capital: “aggressively reduce working capital over the next couple of years”
  • CapEx: focus on highest priority projects only
  • M&A: “off the table” currently
  • Hybrid debt: considering hybrid instruments to strengthen rating; management acknowledged hybrids often carry ~150 to 200 bps higher coupon and ~50% equity credit

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Snacks simplification: “tough decisions” focused on simplification at brand and network levels; rationalizing portfolio and consolidating nodes/network operations
  • Goldfish: continuing to put “incremental fuel” behind core households with kids; management cites stabilization and intent to grow
  • Innovation strategy shift: fewer, more meaningful innovations rather than broad proliferation of small innovations
  • Brand support reallocation: conscious choices on which brands receive advertising support based on readiness for that spend
  • SKU tail reduction: tail SKUs in certain brands targeted for reduction to simplify operations, reduce waste, improve plant efficiency, and improve network economics
  • Operational focus: continued improvement of margins on SG&A and supply chain side; “more opportunity” due to continued volume pressures
  • Trade program effectiveness: management will limit TPRs that only run on shelf (lower ROI); prioritize feature-in-display where ROIs are “really, really impressive”
  • Promotions: for bakery, management “canceled all promotions in Q3” to improve on-shelf availability; expected similar margin profile in Q4 while restarting promotional activity is discussed as operationally feasible

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • FY27 inflation framework (if oil stays around $100/bbl): base inflation ~3% plus incremental 2% to 3% from Middle East conflict/strait disruption and associated logistics and input impacts; management clarifies incremental total is holistic beyond oil and includes packaging, logistics, aluminum, and fertilizer effects
  • Inflation cadence: first half of FY27 expected to be “pretty high” because prices are set; second half is the question mark (potential closer to 3% vs continued elevated levels if conflict persists)
  • Q4 net sales: flattish to slightly up; management indicates lower end of organic net sales “minus 1% to minus 2%” more realistic
  • Q4 EPS: described as likely closer to “$2.20 to below” given moving parts (share count and other offsets); upper/lower range uncertainty acknowledged
  • Q4 tariff refund timing: direct component likely in Q4; vendor component may take longer with “some roll into next year”

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Cost pressure risk into FY27: elevated inflation (target 5% to 6% total) and logistics/freight inflation from driver shortages; management also cites elevated input costs (fuel, aluminum, fertilizer impacts)
  • Earnings risk from share count: GAAP share count mechanically raised due to La Regina (about 7 million shares), artificially increasing share count from ~299M to ~306M
  • Snacks margin and volume headwinds: sequential margin improvement does not offset ~400 bps YoY EBIT margin decline; salty business expected to remain under pressure near term
  • RGM execution risk: need to optimize trade spend and adjust investments returning “not terrific benefits”; if not enough, may require “surgical pricing”
  • Retailer/tariff pass-through risk: management states no intention to refund tariffs, but acknowledges “always a risk” retailers could pressure for consumer pass-through
  • Network simplification timing: SKU rationalization and simplification expected to take time (salty stabilization “going to take a little bit longer”)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • FY27 inflation and mitigation: Management quantified total inflation as ~5% to 6% if oil stays ~100/bbl, built from ~3% baseline plus +2% to 3% incremental from the conflict. They emphasized elevated productivity, the $100M SG&A takeout timeline, working-capital reduction, and trade ROI optimization before resorting to pricing.
  • Snacks margin bridge and Q3 drivers: Management explained EBIT margin rose from a little over 7% in Q2 to ~10% in Q3, in line with expectations, driven by lower trade spend and less marketing YoY. However, both quarters remained down ~400 bps YoY, with bakery promoting pauses hurting volume but helping margins.
  • RGM/Tariff specifics: Management said Q4 tariff refund impact is ~$0.03 to $0.04 per share, offset by higher fuel/driver shortage and Iran-conflict impacts. They also clarified RGM effectiveness: TPRs “on the shelf” underperform, while feature-in-display produces “really, really impressive” ROIs, so they’ll cut weaker promotions.

Sentiment: CAUTIOUS

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the CPB Q3 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Campbell Soup Company (CPB) Financial Profile