Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) Market Cap

Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Sandeep Sahai

Sector: Technology

Industry: Software - Application

IPO Date: 2021-09-24

Website: https://clearwateranalytics.com

Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. develops and provides a Software-as-a-Service solution for automated investment data aggregation, reconciliation, accounting, and reporting services to insurers, investment managers, corporations, institutional investors, and government entities. The company offers investment accounting and reporting, performance measurement, compliance monitoring, and risk analytics solutions. Its Clearwater Prism solution enables self-service access to data feeds from accounting, compliance, performance, and risk systems, including those offered by the company and other third-party software vendors, as well as provides flexible reporting to various users. The company was incorporated in 2021 and is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.

Analyst Sentiment

50%
Hold

From 9 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $24.55

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$25

Median

$25

High Bound

$25

Average

$25

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$24.55
▲ +0.74% Upside
Low Target
$24.55
1% Risk
Median Target
$24.55
1% Mid
High Target
$24.55
1% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 CLEARWATER ANALYTICS HOLDINGS INC (CWAN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Clearwater Analytics provides cloud-based investment accounting, tax, and investor reporting infrastructure for asset managers and investment funds. The platform consolidates inputs across investment activity, positions, and entity structures, then automates calculation-heavy outputs used for investor communications and compliance workflows. In practice, the service combines software with operational know-how (including configuration and ongoing managed support), reducing the need for manual reconciliations and bespoke spreadsheet processes at the customer level.

Customer value is driven by shortening and de-risking the financial close and reporting cycle, improving consistency of allocations and statements, and creating an auditable system of record that can scale as portfolios, strategies, and fund complexity expand.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily tied to recurring platform usage (subscription-like software economics) and a services/implementation layer that supports onboarding, configuration, and integration. Over time, the mix typically tilts toward recurring revenue as workflows become standardized within a customer’s reporting cadence.

Key margin drivers include (1) operating leverage from standardized platform processing, (2) utilization of delivery teams as implementations shift to repeatable patterns, and (3) the ability to broaden the scope of reporting modules per customer without proportionate incremental service cost. Monetisation also benefits from the business’s “workflow embedded” nature: once accounting/tax processes are established, additional reporting requirements often map to incremental configuration rather than full reinvention.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Clearwater’s moat is anchored in high switching costs and data gravity. The platform becomes deeply embedded in customers’ recurring reporting workflows, including historical cost basis/tax attributes, calculation logic, and statement generation processes. Migrating away requires not only software replacement, but also rebuilding an integrated operational “source of truth,” validating outputs, and re-establishing control and audit trails—an undertaking that is difficult to quantify and operationally risky.

The company also benefits from institutional process know-how: accurate allocations, compliance outputs, and investor statement production involve complex rule sets and reconciliation discipline. That execution capability tends to raise effective barriers to entry beyond pure feature comparisons.

  • Competitive benchmarking: SS&C Technologies (fund administration/accounting solutions) vs. Clearwater’s focus on cloud-based investment accounting/tax/reporting workflows for investment managers.
  • Competitive benchmarking: Broadridge (financial communications and related platform services) vs. Clearwater’s emphasis on the calculation and accounting engine that underpins investor reporting outputs.
  • Competitive benchmarking: Apex Group (outsourced fund administration and operational services) vs. Clearwater’s software-led approach that targets repeatable, workflow-embedded automation rather than primarily bespoke operational outsourcing.

Compared with broader fund administration platforms that may offer overlapping services, Clearwater’s differentiation is the specialization in analytics-driven accounting and tax/reporting automation that becomes operationally “locked in” through process integration and historical data continuity.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth over a 5–10 year horizon is driven by structural demand for automation, auditability, and scalability in investment operations:

  • Rising reporting complexity: Increased fund structures, strategy proliferation, and investor requirements extend the operational burden of allocations and tax reporting—favoring platforms that reduce manual reconciliation and calculation risk.
  • Shift from spreadsheets to managed systems: Firms increasingly replace spreadsheet-driven workflows with governed systems of record to meet internal controls and external reporting expectations.
  • Cloud adoption in investment operations: Cloud-based workflows improve scalability and reduce infrastructure overhead, while enabling faster updates to calculation logic and reporting standards.
  • Customer expansion and module attach: As reporting needs broaden (additional funds, strategies, or investor statement variations), customers can expand within the same workflow ecosystem—supporting durable net revenue growth.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Operational accuracy and model governance risk: The value proposition depends on correct calculations and consistent outputs; errors can harm customer trust and increase remediation costs.
  • Regulatory and tax regime changes: Shifts in tax rules, reporting requirements, or accounting standards can require rapid platform updates and strong implementation support.
  • Competitive substitution risk: Large incumbents in fund administration and accounting may bundle overlapping functionality or pressure pricing, especially with customers that have multi-vendor flexibility.
  • Security, privacy, and availability: As a system handling sensitive financial and tax data, the company faces ongoing cybersecurity and business continuity requirements.
  • Implementation and integration complexity: Customer integrations and data mapping can extend onboarding timelines; poor execution can affect retention and early-life economics.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value software-enabled services firms using a blend of revenue quality (recurring mix), growth (net expansion/retention), and profitability trajectory (operating leverage and contribution margins). Common frameworks include EV/Revenue or EV/EBITDA-style multiples for broader business comparability, and ARR/remaining performance metrics when disclosures align with subscription economics.

Key value drivers tend to include durability of recurring revenue, retention and expansion rates, service margin conversion, and confidence in long-term scalability of the platform delivery model.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Clearwater Analytics is positioned in a structural automation and compliance workflow niche where switching costs and data gravity are meaningful. The company’s competitive strength rests on embedding into customers’ recurring accounting and tax/reporting processes, creating a high-friction migration path and enabling multi-year expansion as reporting needs increase. The investment thesis centers on software-led recurring economics with operational leverage, tempered by execution, regulatory responsiveness, and competitive pressure from larger fund administration platforms.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"CWAN reported Q1’26 revenue of $221.2m and EPS of -$0.01, with net income of -$2.8m (net margin -1.3%). QoQ revenue rose to $221.2m from $217.5m in Q4’25 (+1.7%), but profitability weakened: operating income fell from +$10.8m (Q4’25) to +$9.0m in this quarter and net income moved from -$11.8m in Q4 to -$2.8m (an improvement vs the prior quarter’s loss). YoY, revenue increased from $126.9m in Q1’25 to $221.2m in Q1’26 (+74.4%), but net income deteriorated from +$6.5m in Q1’25 to -$2.8m in Q1’26 (a swing of -$9.3m). Margin trends over the four-quarter window show gross margin steady at ~65% (Q1’26 gross margin 65.8%, below Q1’25’s 73.3%), while operating and net margins have been volatile and currently contract (operating margin 4.1% vs 5.6% in Q1’25; net margin -1.3%). Cash flow improved in Q1’26: operating cash flow was $17.7m and free cash flow was $11.2m, supporting liquidity despite negative earnings. Balance sheet strength remains solid with $2.05b equity and $81.5m cash. Total shareholder return is mixed: the stock is up only +4.5% YoY (+32.8% over 6 months) and pays no dividend; buybacks are not indicated in this quarter’s cash flow."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue surged YoY to $221.2m in Q1’26 vs $126.9m in Q1’25 (+74.4%). QoQ growth was modest (+1.7% vs Q4’25).

Profitability

Neutral

Net income is negative (-$2.8m) with net margin -1.3% in Q1’26. YoY net income declined from +$6.5m (Q1’25) to -$2.8m (Q1’26, margin swing from +5.1% to -1.3%). Margins appear down vs earlier quarters (gross margin 65.8% vs 73.3% in Q1’25).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Despite a net loss, operating cash flow was positive at $17.7m and free cash flow was $11.2m in Q1’26. However, earnings are not yet translating into sustained profitability.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Equity is large and stable ($2.05b at 3/31/26 vs $2.03b at 12/31/25). Leverage remains meaningful with net debt of ~$779m, but liquidity is adequate with $81.5m cash and a current ratio of ~2.26.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

No dividend (0% yield). Stock performance is +4.5% over 1 year, with stronger momentum over 6 months (+32.8%). No buyback activity is evident in Q1’26 cash flow.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target ($24.96) is roughly in-line to slightly below the current price ($24.11). Valuation metrics imply elevated multiples (negative earnings), making fundamentals and sentiment more variable.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

CWAN delivered very strong Q3 results and management pushed a clear “margin synergy + durable retention” narrative: $205.1M revenue (+77% YoY), ARR $807.5M (+77%), and adjusted EBITDA margin up to 34.5% (+240 bps sequentially from Q2). GRR held at 98% for the 26th of last 27 quarters, and gross margin reached 78.5% with steady-state Clearwater gross margin at 82%. However, the Q&A shows the harder constraints behind the story. The most explicit operational hurdle is Enfusion’s pricing/contract uplift: new pricing for all new clients starts Jan 1, 2026, but rollout to the existing base is expected to take all of 2026 (substantially done by year-end). Analysts also focused on ARR “core” run-rate vs lumpy deal timing, and hedge fund NRR previously weighed on combined NRR—management expects improvement as cross-sell/risk offerings broaden. Overall tone was confident, but the execution timeline for Enfusion commercial alignment adds near-term uncertainty despite strong bookings momentum.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Alternatives bookings acceleration: core LPx/MLx/Risk/Prism bookings grew ~70% YoY
  • Risk offerings pipeline strength post-Beacon; management cites 7-figure risk deals arriving faster than expected (shorter sales cycles than original expectation)
  • Cross-sell momentum for modules LPx/MLx/Prism/Risk (bookings up 70% for core cross-sell modules)
  • GenAI-driven onboarding/automation to reduce manual work (management cited client outcomes: 90% fewer manual reconciliations, 80% faster regulatory reporting, 50% faster financial close)

Business Development

  • Texas Treasury Safekeeping Trust selected CWAN to account for $30B in state assets (won vs multiple providers)
  • Signed a global multi-billion hedge fund deal with a record 3-month sales cycle (also cited as balancing launches + conversions across North America/Europe/Asia)
  • Signed two 7-digit deals with leading financial institutions (cross-selling beginning “in earnest”)
  • Partnered with AWS; CWAN recognized as an early adopter of Amazon Bedrock AgentCore (generally available last month)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenues: $205.1M, +77% YoY; exceeded high end of guidance by >$1M
  • ARR: $807.5M, +77% YoY
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $70.7M; sequentially up from $58.3M in Q2
  • EBITDA margin: 34.5% in Q3 vs 32.1% in Q2 (+240 bps)
  • Integrated gross margin: 78.5% (flat YoY) and “in line with 2027 targets”; Clearwater steady-state gross margin reached 82%
  • EBITDA margin improvement attributed to GenAI and integration efficiency; integrated business delivered +140 bps EBITDA vs stand-alone Q3 2024
  • Gross revenue retention (GRR): 98% at Sep 30, 2025; 98%+ in 26 of last 27 quarters
  • Net revenue retention (NRR): 108% in Q3 vs 110% in Q2; sequential decline driven by lower AUM growth/asset-based upsells and lapping large September 2025 wins
  • Q3 EBITDA result vs guidance: >$5M above guidance
  • Q4 2025 guidance: revenue $216M–$217M (+71%–72% YoY); adjusted EBITDA $73M (34% margin)
  • FY 2025 guidance: revenue $730M–$731M (~+62% YoY); FY adjusted EBITDA $247M implying 34% full-year margin (+180 bps vs 2024 margins)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Paid down $40M in debt during the quarter
  • Repurchased >800,000 shares of CWAN stock concurrently
  • Net debt / annualized Q3 EBITDA leverage: 2.7x (comfortably below 3x target)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Integration progress planned for H2 2026 / early 2027: single security master, single comprehensive data platform, single interaction layer, and single interchange layer
  • Commercial model work for Enfusion + new businesses underway; pricing model rollout to new clients starting Jan 1, 2026
  • Management preference for “tech-driven” onboarding acceleration via GenAI vs hiring more onboarding staff (trade-off discussion with analyst)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q3-enabling strength expected to continue: management cited Q4 as “very similar” to the September Investor Day momentum
  • Enfusion pricing/contract revisions: target program rolls out new pricing model to all new clients beginning Jan 1, 2026; management expects implementation to take all of 2026 with most completion by end of 2026 (nuanced by client/platform differences)
  • Enfusion growth guidance reiterated at ~12% for 2025; asked whether it could accelerate by “a couple hundred basis points” for 2026—management stated thesis unchanged and expects growth could accelerate (but magnitude to be better viewed in February 2026 guidance)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Enfusion: timing/magnitude of pricing & contract uplift is not immediate; phased rollout—new clients Jan 1, 2026; existing clients rolled after, expected to take all of 2026
  • NRR lumpiness/quarter-to-quarter variability due to larger deals and AUM movements; management explicitly noted ARR differences can be caused by AUM and lumpiness (not matching sequentially)
  • Hedge fund segment: management noted hedge fund NRR weighed on consolidated combined net expansion; improving as commercial model evolves and as risk offerings are expanded to hedge fund clients
  • Sequential NRR decline in Q3: attributed to lower contribution from AUM growth/asset-based upsells and lapping large September 2025 wins

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the CWAN Q3 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) Financial Profile