DXC Technology Company

DXC Technology Company (DXC) Market Cap

DXC Technology Company has a market capitalization of —.

No quote data available.

CEO: Raul J. Fernandez

Sector: Technology

Industry: Information Technology Services

IPO Date: 1981-12-31

Website: https://dxc.com

DXC Technology Company (DXC) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

DXC Technology Company, along with its affiliated entities, delivers a comprehensive suite of IT solutions and services across various global regions, with a significant presence in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. The company structures its operations into two primary divisions: Global Business Services (GBS) and Global Infrastructure Services (GIS). Within its GBS segment, DXC offers a range of analytics offerings, supported by an extensive partner ecosystem, empowering clients to quickly gain insights, automate operational processes, and accelerate their digital transformation initiatives. This segment also provides expertise in software engineering, strategic consulting, and data analytics to help businesses manage vital operations, modernize practices, and innovate their business models. Furthermore, GBS leverages diverse technologies and approaches to expedite the development, updating, deployment, and upkeep of secure applications, thereby enabling quicker innovation, minimized risk, faster market entry, and lower overall cost. Additionally, this division provides business process services, including the unification and enhancement of both client-facing and internal operations, along with agile process automation. The GIS segment focuses on assisting organizations in transitioning older applications to cloud platforms, migrating appropriate workloads, and managing complex multi-cloud environments securely. It also provides robust security offerings designed to foresee and proactively counter threats, ensure regulatory compliance, and safeguard data, applications, and infrastructure. Moreover, GIS offers outsourced IT services, allowing clients to operate essential systems and IT infrastructure securely and efficiently. Complementing these services, the segment delivers workplace solutions customized to align with employee, business, and IT needs, spanning intelligent collaboration tools, modern device management, digital support, and mobility services. DXC Technology Company's corporate headquarters are located in Ashburn, Virginia.

Analyst Sentiment

44%
Hold

From 8 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $13.25

â–Č +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$11

Median

$13

High Bound

$16

Average

$13

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$13.25
â–Č +17.88% Upside
Low Target
$10.50
-7% Risk
Median Target
$13.25
18% Mid
High Target
$16.00
42% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

valuation & financial ratiosdetailed financials

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

â„č

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 DXC TECHNOLOGY (DXC) — Investment Overview

đŸ§© Business Model Overview

DXC TECHNOLOGY is an enterprise IT services provider delivering outcomes across the customer lifecycle: strategy and transformation, systems integration, and long-term managed services. The company typically works inside the “run and change” environment—helping clients modernize applications and infrastructure while also operating or supporting those systems under service-level agreements.

This creates a value chain that combines (1) advisory and implementation (project work), (2) transition and migration (data, apps, and infrastructure), and (3) ongoing operations (managed services), with deeper engagement as client environments become more complex and tightly coupled to DXC’s delivery processes, tooling, and documentation.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

DXC monetizes through a blend of:
  • Managed services / outsourcing (recurring): contracted services tied to uptime, performance, and process execution—typically the steadier component of revenue.
  • Application and infrastructure services (semi-recurring/transactional): implementation, integration, and modernization projects that convert transformation demand into deliverable milestones.
  • Consulting and advisory (transactional): early-stage discovery, architecture, and program leadership that can roll into implementation and managed operations.
Margin structure is driven by delivery efficiency and the mix between project-heavy work (more variable margins depending on execution) and managed services (more predictable, but sensitive to contract economics). Sustainable margin typically requires disciplined subcontractor usage, labor productivity, automation where appropriate, and strong contract governance to limit scope creep and unfavorable pricing.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

DXC’s competitive position is rooted more in switching costs and service delivery scale than in proprietary software. The moat tends to be “sticky execution”:
  • High Switching Costs (Embedded Operations & Data Gravity): Large enterprise IT estates are deeply integrated—moving workloads, processes, and operational runbooks is costly and risky. Once DXC supports core systems under defined SLAs, customers face operational discontinuity costs if they replace the provider.
  • Contractual Stickiness: Managed services and long-duration transformation programs create natural renewal pathways when performance meets expectations.
  • Delivery Capabilities & Reusable Assets: Industry playbooks, engineering standards, automation, and governance frameworks can reduce the cost-to-serve over time, supporting competitive bids in a price-disciplined market.
Competitive benchmarking:
  • Accenture: broader consulting and transformation footprint with strong enterprise consulting brand; tends to win large end-to-end transformations across many verticals.
  • IBM Consulting: hybrid cloud and enterprise modernization leverage; often emphasizes platform alliances and enterprise analytics.
  • Capgemini (and other peers such as Cognizant/Infosys/NTT DATA): strengths in large-scale delivery and technology services.
DXC’s differentiation historically leans toward enterprise infrastructure and managed services with emphasis on operational execution for mission-critical environments (including regulated sectors such as public sector and healthcare). In practice, DXC competes by translating transformation demand into durable run-and-change engagements, whereas many larger peers may emphasize consulting-led positioning that subsequently battles for long-horizon operations.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, DXC’s addressable market expands as enterprises convert infrastructure and application modernization into ongoing operational requirements:
  • Cloud adoption with an enterprise “migration + operations” need: Cloud transformation is not only about moving workloads; enterprises require integration, governance, performance management, and continued support—creating managed services demand.
  • Application modernization and legacy rationalization: Re-platforming, re-architecting, and data integration programs are recurring sources of transformation budgets that can extend into operational ownership.
  • Cybersecurity and compliance operations: Regulatory pressure and threat evolution increase demand for security operations, incident response readiness, and continuous control monitoring.
  • Data management and analytics enablement: As data estates grow, enterprises require integration, data quality, lineage, and operational analytics pipelines—work that often remains under service contracts.
  • AI-enabled automation for efficiency: Adoption of intelligent automation changes delivery economics (cost-to-serve), supporting margin recovery potential when embedded into managed services delivery.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Execution and contract economics risk: Large delivery programs can face scope creep, timeline slippage, and unfavorable assumptions that compress margins; managed services can be pressured by renewal pricing and changing labor costs.
  • Competitive pricing and deal concentration: The IT services market is cyclical and price-competitive, with bid aggressiveness affecting profitability and revenue visibility.
  • Technology disruption and delivery relevance: Shifts in enterprise architecture (cloud platforms, tooling ecosystems, operating models) can erode differentiation if delivery capabilities do not keep pace.
  • Capital structure and refinancing sensitivity: IT services providers depend on operational cash generation; balance sheet constraints can amplify downside during weaker execution cycles.
  • Operational and cyber risk: Serving as an operator for mission-critical systems exposes DXC to reputational and financial impacts from service outages or cyber incidents.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value IT services companies using EV/EBITDA and earnings multiples, with incremental attention to free cash flow conversion and revenue quality (recurring vs. project mix). What tends to move valuation:
  • Improving managed services mix and contract renewal momentum (higher revenue visibility).
  • Evidence of sustainable margin expansion through delivery efficiency and better contract economics.
  • Cash conversion from earnings to free cash flow, reflecting working capital discipline and capex normalization.
  • De-risking of large program exposure (lower loss volatility and fewer material execution write-downs).
Overall, the sector’s valuation sensitivity is less about software-like growth rates and more about reliability of execution, contract durability, and cash generation.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

DXC TECHNOLOGY’s long-term investment case rests on enterprise switching costs created by embedded operations and data/process integration, combined with the industry’s secular demand for “run-and-change” IT modernization, cloud operations, and security/compliance. The key diligence focus is whether DXC can sustain profitable delivery through disciplined contract economics and improve cash generation—turning transformation demand into durable, repeatable managed services outcomes.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Related Companies in Technology

APPLOVIN CORP CLASS A (APP)

Technology

$133.00B

Mkt Cap

BLOCK INC CLASS A (XYZ)

Technology

$48.35B

Mkt Cap

TRADE DESK INC CLASS A (TTD)

Technology

$8.48B

Mkt Cap

DATADOG INC CLASS A (DDOG)

Technology

$95.39B

Mkt Cap

WORKDAY INC CLASS A (WDAY)

Technology

$42.00B

Mkt Cap

DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C (DELL)

Technology

$269.19B

Mkt Cap

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"DXC reported Q1 2027 results (quarter ended 2026-06-30) with Revenue of $2.999B and Net Income of $122M (EPS $0.75). Revenue was down QoQ (from $3.130B in 2026-03-31, -4.2%) but up YoY versus $3.159B in 2025-06-30 (+5.2%). Net income swung positively QoQ (from -$141M in Q4 2026 to +$122M; NIM improvement of +8.6pp) and remained higher YoY (from $16M in Q1 2026; +662.5% YoY). Net profit margin improved to ~4.1% from ~-4.5% QoQ and ~0.5% YoY. Profitability stabilization is evident versus the prior quarter’s loss, with income before tax rising to $241M and improving operating/EBITDA metrics (EBITDA $559M, up from -$0.004B QoQ). Cash flow quality strengthened: operating cash flow was $418M and free cash flow $359M, both higher than Q4’s $239M CFO and $169M FCF. Shareholder returns appear modest from fundamentals: buybacks continued (common stock repurchased -$71M) while no dividends were paid. Balance sheet resilience also improved vs Q4: total assets were roughly flat (-0.1% QoQ), but leverage eased materially with net debt turning negative at -$786M (vs +$2.51B net debt in 2026-03-31) and equity rising to $3.33B from $3.21B. On the market side, DXC’s price is $12.97, with 1-year performance of -11.41% (no >20% momentum boost). Valuation remains low-to-middling on accounting measures (price/sales ~0.48, P/E ~2.95 per provided ratios) with a consensus target of $14."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue declined -4.2% (from $3.130B to $2.999B) but YoY revenue increased +5.2% (from $3.159B). Direction improved versus last year but not sequentially.

Profitability

Good

Net income rose to $122M from -$141M QoQ (+8.6pp NIM improvement) and to $16M YoY (+662.5%). Net profit margin improved to ~4.1% vs ~-4.5% QoQ and ~0.5% YoY.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Operating cash flow improved to $418M (from $239M QoQ) and free cash flow rose to $359M (from $169M). No dividends paid; buybacks continued (-$71M) supporting capital returns.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Not a bank, but resilience improved: total assets were stable (~$12.93B vs $12.89B QoQ) and net debt swung to -$786M from +$2.51B QoQ, indicating substantially reduced financial pressure.

Shareholder Returns

Fair

Fundamental capital return via buybacks (repurchased -$71M) but no dividend yield. Market performance was negative over 1Y (-11.41%), limiting total shareholder return momentum.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus price target is $14 vs $12.97 current (modest upside). Valuation metrics provided imply relatively low earnings multiple (P/E ~2.95), but the reversal from prior loss increases uncertainty.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

RevenueEarningsP/E RatioSharesDebtMargin %

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

DXC’s Q1 FY27 shows weakening top-line (-6.7% organic YoY revenue) but improving demand signals via bookings (+5% YoY) and a near-1.0x book-to-bill (0.99x). Profitability remains under pressure: adjusted EBIT margin fell to 5.0% (-180 bps YoY), reflecting the quarter’s revenue mix and softer discretionary infrastructure work. The company’s narrative is execution of “agentic” productized offerings—OASIS and AgenTxSOC—validated through dramatic operating-time reductions (minutes to seconds) and accelerating evaluation-to-contract timelines (4+ weeks for AgenTxSOC). GIS is the center of the second-half inflection, with management tying most improvement to opening backlog and only modest in-year project-service gains. CES is more dependent on stabilizing project-based services amid custom-app declines, while enterprise apps growth is a key offset. Guidance remains range-bound and macro-neutral, with upside requiring discretionary normalization and higher-than-modeled yield from new Anthropic-certified content.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • AgenTxSOC and OASIS deployments driving faster security/IT operations and measurable reductions in response and resolution times
  • CES traction from project-based services stability and improved enterprise apps growth (enterprise apps: best in a couple of years; 3 consecutive quarters of growth)
  • GIS acceleration expected from opening backlog dynamics across the year and new content (including Oasis and AgenTxSOC product content)
  • Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE) model: early bench of 86 trained engineers from Anthropic hands-on base camps, scaling toward tens of thousands

Business Development

  • Global partnership with Anthropic (agentic solutions, FDE certification; multilingual FDE model)
  • FDE multilingual certification model combining Amazon QuickSight, Microsoft Copilot, 7AI, and 11 Labs
  • AgenTxSOC technical evaluation completed in just over 4 weeks with a multiyear, multimillion-dollar engagement (unnamed major global entertainment and technology company)
  • OASIS expansion: deployed across 57 customer environments; goal of 85 customers by end of first half and 125 customers by end of fiscal year (customer list not named)
  • TCS trade secrets litigation resolution (cash benefit and accounting impact, customer/vendor relationship referenced only for litigation)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Total revenue: $3.0B, down 6.7% YoY (slightly above midpoint of guidance range)
  • Adjusted EBIT margin: 5.0%, down 180 bps YoY
  • Non-GAAP EPS: $0.40, in line with guidance
  • Total bookings: +5% YoY; book-to-bill 0.99x, highest first quarter in past 3 years; trailing 12-month book-to-bill slightly above 1.0x
  • CES book-to-bill: 0.98x; trailing 12-month CES book-to-bill: 1.04x; CES revenue: -3% YoY
  • GIS book-to-bill: 1.11x with +35% YoY bookings driven by new logos and renewals in intelligent infrastructure and workplace; GIS revenue: -11% YoY (margin noted as down in Q&A to ~2.6%)
  • Insurance grew 1.4% YoY; total insurance software revenue +13% YoY; insurance services down ~1% YoY due to wind-down of a BPO contract (impact expected in Q2 and Q3)
  • Free cash flow: $314M in quarter including $214M cash benefit from TCS litigation; excluding benefit, FCF ~$100M (modest YoY improvement)
  • Cash balance: ~$1.9B (+$200M from FY26 year-end) including litigation proceeds; net debt ~ $1.5B, down nearly $270M
  • Capital return: repurchased $70M shares in quarter; full-year plan includes ~$50M share repurchases
  • FY27 guidance: organic revenue -3% to -5% YoY; adjusted EBIT margin 6% to 7%; non-GAAP diluted EPS $2.40 to $2.90; FY27 free cash flow ~$685M (includes $214M TCS benefit plus IRS tax litigation deposit to stop additional interest)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: $70M during Q1; expect ~$50M total repurchase during FY27
  • Debt: anticipate retiring $400M of US dollar bonds maturing September 2026
  • Cash runway: ended quarter with ~$1.9B cash; net debt reduced to ~ $1.5B

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Customer Zero philosophy: build/run in DXC environment, prove results, then scale to customers
  • Agentic SOC impact: time to intrusion detection reduced from ~21 minutes to ~6 seconds
  • OASIS scale: deployed across 57 customer environments; focus on resolution time, ticket backlog reduction, and maintaining diagnostic accuracy
  • FDE (Forward Deployed Engineer) model: certifying DXC engineers with Anthropic via hands-on base camps in San Francisco and London; first 86 trained
  • Multilingual FDE certification model development combining Amazon QuickSight, Anthropic, Microsoft Copilot, 7AI, and 11 Labs
  • Leadership operationalization: Dan Gray becomes leader of GIS; Dan co-led OASIS and AgenTxSOC development; Jen Ragone promoted to president of AI innovation strategy and LabX; Raymond August joins as President

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 FY27 organic revenue expected: -5.5% to -6.5% YoY
  • Q2 FY27 adjusted EBIT margin expected: ~6.0%
  • Q2 FY27 non-GAAP diluted EPS expected: ~0.55
  • FY27 revenue: organic -3% to -5% YoY with improved second-half decline rate
  • FY27 adjusted EBIT margin: 6% to 7% with margins improving sequentially
  • FY27 free cash flow: ~$685M (prior ~$600M baseline + $214M TCS benefit + IRS deposit related to 2009 currency-loss tax litigation)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Customer caution and muted discretionary short-term project activity, especially impacting IT infrastructure revenue in GIS
  • CES year-over-year pressure from difficult large-deal comparison in CES first quarter (prior-year larger deals)
  • CES custom applications continued quarter-to-quarter declines (despite enterprise apps growth)
  • GIS revenue softer than expectation in Q1 due to discretionary infrastructure projects not meeting anticipated levels; margin pressure expected to bounce back only as revenue improves
  • Insurance book-to-bill low due to lumpy renewal-based deals; risk is timing of new customer wins converting into revenue within the year
  • Guidance explicitly assumes no macro change; higher end outcomes depend on loosening discretionary work and better yield/conversion from new (Anthropic) content

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Q2-to-2H revenue improvement: Management said the implied second-half growth rate must improve from about -6.5% to roughly -2% YoY. They attributed ~90% of GIS-driven improvement to opening backlog dynamics, with ~75% visibility, plus modest in-year sales gains and limited CES improvement reliance.
  • CES bookings and reacceleration needs: Management framed CES as two parts—project-based smaller deals versus large deals. They emphasized tougher YoY large-deal comps in the prior year, while project-based bookings stability supports the guide. They added Anthropic FDE certification is the biggest offering beneficiary and were conservative in modeling yield to zero.
  • High-end vs low-end guidance drivers: Management said the forecast bakes in no macro change. Upside depends on (1) loosening discretionary project-based work and (2) better-than-conservative yield assumptions on new Anthropic content, resulting in bookings converting into revenue in the second half. They cautioned against expecting major GIS project-service pickup.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the DXC Q1 2027 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — DXC Technology Company (DXC) Financial Profile