Evergy, Inc.

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) Market Cap

Evergy, Inc. has a market capitalization of โ€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: David A. Campbell

Sector: Utilities

Industry: Regulated Electric

IPO Date: 2018-06-04

Website: https://investors.evergy.com

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Utilities

Company Profile

Evergy, Inc., along with its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated electric utility, focusing on the production, conveyance, distribution, and direct sale of power throughout Kansas and Missouri in the United States. The company's electricity generation relies on a diverse energy mix, utilizing sources such as coal, hydroelectric, landfill gas, uranium, natural gas, and oil, alongside a growing portfolio of renewables like solar and wind energy. Supporting its operations, Evergy maintains a robust infrastructure, which includes roughly 10,100 circuit miles of high-voltage transmission lines, about 39,800 circuit miles of overhead distribution lines, and an additional 13,000 circuit miles of underground distribution networks. It provides service to a substantial customer base of approximately 1,620,400, encompassing residential consumers, commercial enterprises, industrial facilities, municipal entities, and fellow electric utilities. Evergy, Inc. was founded in 2017 and has its main corporate headquarters situated in Kansas City, Missouri.

Analyst Sentiment

68%
Buy

From 14 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $89.67

โ–ฒ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$82

Median

$89

High Bound

$97

Average

$90

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

๐ŸŽฏ Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$89.67
โ–ฒ +8.02% Upside
Low Target
$82.00
-1% Risk
Median Target
$89.00
7% Mid
High Target
$97.00
17% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

๐Ÿ“˜ Full Research Report

โ„น๏ธ

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

๐Ÿ“˜ EVERGY INC (EVRG) โ€” Investment Overview

๐Ÿงฉ Business Model Overview

Evergy is a regulated electric utility that generates and delivers electricity primarily to retail customers through a vertically integrated model of power generation and a regulated wire business (transmission and distribution). The economic โ€œhow it worksโ€ is governed by state utility commissions: Evergy builds and operates grid assets, incurs operating costs, and then earns returns on invested capital (โ€œrate baseโ€) subject to regulatory review. Customer stickiness is driven by the essential nature of power delivery and the regulated service territories, which limit meaningful customer switching and competition.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is largely recurring and governed by regulatory rate design rather than customer-by-customer contracting. Monetisation comes from:
  • Retail utility bills (generation, transmission, and distribution components), with cost recovery mechanisms that generally link certain inputs to customer bills through regulatory riders and fuel adjustment structures.
  • Regulated transmission and distribution charges, which tend to be more stable because pricing is based on allowed returns and approved capital expenditure plans.
  • Ancillary and wholesale dynamics that can affect generation economics, but the overall earnings profile remains anchored in the regulated asset base and rate proceedings.
Margin drivers are dominated by (1) the ability to earn an approved return on capital, (2) regulatory lag and outcome variability in rate cases, and (3) operating cost discipline on maintenance, labor, and purchased power/fuel components where not fully protected by riders.

๐Ÿง  Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Evergyโ€™s core moat is primarily geographic/regulatory and switching-cost driven rather than operational cost leadership alone.
  • Switching Costs (Customer Mobility Constraint): Electricity distribution service is effectively a local monopoly; customers cannot economically โ€œswitch grids.โ€ This structural constraint supports steady demand for service within the approved territory.
  • Regulatory Moat: As earnings are shaped by commission-approved rate structures, competitors cannot simply undercut pricing without obtaining a regulated framework for their own service territory and assets.
  • Operational/Capital Execution Advantage: Utility performance depends on disciplined capital project delivery (grid reliability, modernization, and compliance). Consistent execution reduces regulatory friction and supports smoother earnings realization.
Competitive benchmarking (primary peers in regulated electric utility markets):
  • Ameren (AEE): Concentrated in Illinois and Missouri; similar regulatory framework but different load mix, weather profile, and asset base characteristics.
  • Xcel Energy (XEL): Larger multi-state footprint; diversified by geography and generation mix, which can alter the sensitivity of earnings to regional resource availability and policy.
  • CenterPoint Energy (CNP): Focused more on distribution with substantial Houston-area load; different regulatory environments and reliability/program priorities.
Contrast in focus: Evergyโ€™s competitive differentiation is tied to its specific Kansas/Missouri footprint, the composition and modernization of its transmission/distribution system, and the regulator-specific approach to cost recovery and allowed returnsโ€”areas where peers operate under different state oversight and grid conditions.

๐Ÿš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5โ€“10 year horizon, growth is tied more to rate-base expansion and grid investment than to high-volume customer growth:
  • Grid modernization and reliability programs: Aging infrastructure replacement, storm hardening, and system upgrades support capital investment and, subject to regulatory approval, continued earnings visibility.
  • Renewables integration and load electrification: Managing intermittency, strengthening transmission/distribution, and accommodating electrification trends (e.g., industrial electrification and electric vehicle adoption) increase network requirements.
  • Demand-side and efficiency-driven regulation: Energy efficiency and demand response programs can influence earnings profiles, often through regulatory mechanisms that define cost and benefit sharing.
  • Cost recovery frameworks: Rider-based structures and rate cases can allow recovery of certain prudently incurred costs, supporting the durability of regulated cash flows.

โš  Risk Factors to Monitor

Key structural risks include:
  • Regulatory and legislative uncertainty: Earnings depend on the timing and outcome of rate cases, prudence reviews, and commission policy on allowed returns, depreciation, and program cost recovery.
  • Capital intensity and project execution risk: Construction and modernization programs require disciplined execution; cost overruns or delays can lead to reduced returns or extended regulatory resolution.
  • Weather and operational variability: Storms and extreme temperatures can pressure operating costs, grid performance, and working capital.
  • Fuel and purchased power exposure: While mechanisms often pass through some costs, generation economics and timing mismatches can still affect earnings and cash flow.
  • Financing and credit considerations: Utilities remain sensitive to interest rates and credit conditions because capital spending is funded through equity and debt markets.

๐Ÿ“Š Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value regulated utilities using frameworks centered on the relationship between rate-base growth, allowed returns, and durability of earnings, with less emphasis on high-growth multiples. Common valuation lenses include:
  • EV/EBITDA and earnings yield style approaches that reflect regulated cash flow stability.
  • Implied rate-case outcomes: Valuation tends to react to expectations for future allowed returns, capital program approvals, and regulatory timeline certainty.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity: Higher rates can pressure valuation via discount-rate effects and financing cost expectations, even when regulatory economics are stable.
Drivers that most move the needle are the credibility of capital plan execution, regulatory outcome consistency, and the net impact of policy and grid programs on the permitted earnings structure.

๐Ÿ” Investment Takeaway

Evergyโ€™s investment case is anchored in a regulated, geographically constrained distribution franchise with structural customer stickiness and a regulatory framework that links earnings to prudent capital deployment. The long-term profile depends on disciplined grid investment execution and favorable/credible regulatory outcomes, with valuation primarily driven by confidence in rate-base growth, allowed returns, and cost recovery mechanisms rather than by volume growth or disruptive business model shifts.

โš  AI-generated โ€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

๐Ÿ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"EVRG reported Q1โ€™26 revenue of $1.4437B (+5.5% QoQ vs. Q4โ€™25; +5.4% YoY vs. Q1โ€™25). Net income was $151.5M, down (0.6%) QoQ but up 21.4% YoY. EPS was $0.66 vs. $0.37 in Q4โ€™25 and $0.54 in Q1โ€™25, with diluted shares relatively stable. Profitability was mixed across the most recent quarters: gross margin expanded to 67.5% in Q1โ€™26 from 24.6% in Q4โ€™25, while operating margin improved to 22.1% from 17.1%. However, profitability is volatile across the last four reported quarters (notably Q3โ€™25), so we view Q1โ€™26 as an improvement versus the immediately prior quarter rather than a steady multi-quarter trend. Net margin rose to 10.5% from 6.3% QoQ and 9.1% YoY, indicating better bottom-line conversion. Cash generation weakened: operating cash flow was $362.5M but free cash flow was -$489.4M due to heavy PPE investment (-$851.9M). Balance sheet resilience remains intact with total assets of $34.5B and equity of $10.2B; leverage (net debt) remains elevated (~$15.9B). Shareholder returns appear supportive: the stock is up 22.2% over 1 year (total return tailwind), and the dividend yield is ~0.83%, though the payout ratio is >100% in Q1โ€™26, implying dividend coverage was strained by negative free cash flow. Analyst valuation context: consensus price target is $89 vs. current ~$82.37 (modest upside), consistent with improved recent profitability but continued cash flow pressure."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue rose to $1.444B in Q1โ€™26 (+5.5% QoQ, +5.4% YoY). Growth is positive but not high-growth.

Profitability

Positive

Net margin improved to 10.5% (from 6.3% QoQ and 9.1% YoY). Operating margin expanded to 22.1% vs. 17.1% QoQ, though results are volatile across the last four quarters.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Free cash flow was -$489M in Q1โ€™26 despite positive operating cash flow ($363M), driven by large PPE investment (-$852M). Dividend payout ratio was ~104% and coverage was pressured.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were $34.5B with equity stable at ~$10.2B. Net debt remains high (~$15.9B), but the equity base is resilient.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

Stock shows strong momentum (+22.16% 1Y). Dividend yield is ~0.83%, but Q1โ€™26 payout ratio (~104%) suggests buy/hold dividend quality depends on sustaining cash flows.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target of $89 vs. current ~$82.37 implies modest upside. Valuation multiples remain demanding (e.g., high P/E), so execution on cash flow is key.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

EVRGโ€™s Q1 2026 results show a material EPS beat versus Q1 2025 ($0.69 vs $0.55) driven by large-load demand strength, regulated investment recovery ($0.15 EPS), and early benefits from ESA amendments and new LLPS-related large customer activity, partially offset by mild winter weather (~-$0.06) and higher O&M/depreciation/net interest (-$0.10). Management reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.14โ€“$4.34 (midpoint $4.24) and lifted the long-term load/capital outlook: retail load growth CAGR 2025โ€“2030 now ~7%โ€“8% (from 6%), and rate base CAGR now ~12% (from 11.5%). The key catalyst is the newly announced fifth Kansas Central data-center ESA plus amendments to two prior ESAs, increasing peak megawatts and improving 2026 margin visibility via minimum bill protections under LLPS. Q&A focused on reconciling rate-base/EPS deltas, spare capacity and capital intensity assumptions, and the timing/likely direction of Missouri regulatory outcomes, especially Missouri Westโ€™s above-inflation exposure.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • 5th large-customer electric service agreement (ESA) for a new data center project in Kansas Central, tied to the large load power service tariff (LLPS)
  • Amendment of 2 previously signed ESAs to refine/accelerate 2026 load profiles, delivering a boost to 2026 margins
  • Weather-normalized retail demand growth of 4.7% in Q1 2026
  • Operational ramp ahead of plan: Panasonic ramp and a large data center startup in March (ahead of schedule)

Business Development

  • New ESA with a premier data-center developer in Kansas Central (customer specifics confidential) working with a hyperscaler offtaker (ESAs are under LLPS)
  • Amendments to 2 previously signed large-customer ESAs (load profile refinements; minimum bill protections referenced)
  • Panasonic electric vehicle battery manufacturing plant (referenced as a non-LLPS large customer; ~450 MW steady-state peak load)
  • Kansas Central LLPS portfolio: 5 data center projects executed under LLPS tariffs securing protections and minimum bill protections

AI IconFinancial Highights

  • Adjusted earnings: $0.69 EPS ($162M) in Q1 2026 vs $0.55 EPS ($128M) in Q1 2025
  • EPS bridge: weather-related impact was mild winter (fewer heating degree days) reducing EPS by ~($0.06) vs budget; offset by weather-normalized demand/revenue effects and large-load revenue benefit
  • Large customers: Panasonic + March data center startup drove $0.02 EPS benefit vs prior year in Q1
  • Regulated investment recovery/return on regulated investments contributed $0.15 EPS
  • Higher O&M and increased depreciation plus net interest related to infrastructure investments reduced EPS by $0.10
  • Other items added $0.09 EPS tailwind (includes COLI and incremental power marketing; ETR lower than prior year)
  • 2026 adjusted EPS guidance reaffirmed: $4.14 to $4.34 (midpoint $4.24)
  • Q2 2026 adjusted EPS guidance: +17% to +19% vs $4.24 midpoint
  • Forecast updates: retail load growth CAGR 2025โ€“2030 raised to ~7%โ€“8% from 6% previously; large-load ramp supports annual earnings growth >8% beginning in 2028
  • Rate base CAGR increased to ~12% from 11.5% (ESA-driven capital plan update)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Equity issuance plan unchanged: $700M to $900M per year from 2026โ€“2029; total ~$3.3B
  • No equity issuance needs currently in 2030 (credit metrics strengthen through 2030)
  • For 2026: $125M already priced; remaining 2026 need expects to be met via ATM (no block issuance planned)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Large customer strategy execution accelerating: worked with 2 large customers to refine anticipated load profiles and amend ESAs during the quarter
  • LLPS/minimum bill protections emphasized for data center ESAs (visibility into monthly billings and long-duration cash flows)
  • Operational emphasis on reliability and grid/generation availability metrics (SAIDI/SAIFI, resiliency, fleet availability) with strong early 2026 start cited
  • All-of-the-above generation strategy update direction: targeted investments in natural gas, energy storage, and solar (per 2026 IRP updates referenced)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 adjusted EPS range reaffirmed at $4.14โ€“$4.34; midpoint $4.24
  • Second-quarter adjusted EPS guidance: 17%โ€“19% as measured against the $4.24 midpoint
  • Long-term adjusted EPS growth target reiterated: 6%โ€“8% through 2030 off the 2026 midpoint of $4.24; adjusted EPS growth expected to exceed 8% annually beginning in 2028 through 2030
  • Retail load growth: revised 7%โ€“8% annual retail load growth through 2030; additionally stated load growth 6%โ€“11% in each of the next 5 years across utilities

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Mild winter weather in early 2026 reduced EPS by ~($0.06) vs budget (heating degree days below normal)
  • Higher O&M and higher depreciation plus net interest expense tied to capital infrastructure investments reduced EPS by $0.10
  • Regulatory and policy timing risk: integrated resource plan (IRP) filings and subsequent predetermination/CCN filings scheduled through 2026
  • Missouri West rate exposure: more susceptible to market power/price spikes and natural gas volatility (examples cited: Winter Storm Uri, natural gas flaps in 2022, and January of this year)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Rate base vs EPS math for the 500 MW step-up and the implied growth delta Management's detailed response: Management emphasized that the ESA book has โ€œtremendous line of sightโ€ due to signed ESAs with minimum bills, and stated the math the analyst described is directionally right. They reaffirmed confidence in exceeding 8% out-year EPS growth, despite potential offsets not explicitly quantified.
  • Topic: Spare capacity/capacity constraints and how additional ESAs translate into capital intensity Management's detailed response: Management said capital impact is โ€œnot every additional ESAโ€ formulaic, but generally consistent with rate base growth moving from ~11.5% to ~12%. They underscored planning for turbine/T&D lead times, claimed turbine reservations beyond current ESA needs, and committed to signing at least one more ESA in 2026 under the LLPS/ESA framework.
  • Topic: Missouri regulatory settlement timing and Missouri West rate trajectory Management's detailed response: They noted Metro case settlement discussions depend on staff/intervenor testimony ending June 30 and settlement conferences in September 23โ€“24. For Missouri West, they expect filing cadence โ€œevery other year or so,โ€ implying a back-half 2026/early 2027 case. They guided that Missouri West rates may run above inflation for ~5 years due to infrastructure needs and market power exposure, but remain manageable long term.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the EVRG Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
ยฉ 2026 Stock Market Info โ€” Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) Financial Profile