FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock

FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA) Market Cap

FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock has a market capitalization of $249.8M.

Price: $15.46

β–² 0.01 (0.10%)

Market Cap: 249.78M

NASDAQ Β· time unavailable

CEO: Christopher S. Ferris

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 2024-10-23

Website: https://www.bankwithfidelity.com

FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA) - Company Information

Market Cap: 249.78M|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

FB Bancorp, Inc. functions as the parent entity for Fidelity Bank, a mutual savings bank incorporated under Louisiana law. Fidelity Bank's principal business involves gathering funds from the public through deposits and then allocating these, along with capital generated from its operations, to provide mortgage financing for one-to-four family homes in its primary service regions. The bank also extends credit for residential construction projects, commercial property ventures, general business purposes, home equity through both term loans and lines of credit, and various personal consumer loans.

Analyst Sentiment

Analyst ratings pending...

Consensus Target Matrix

Data feed parsing pending...

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$16.23
β–² +5.00% Upside
Low Target
$11.59
-25% Risk
Median Target
$15.76
2% Mid
High Target
$19.32
25% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

πŸ“Š Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 30, 2026Mar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)250224224229221206206169235
Enterprise Value ($M)355329273247218187169144156
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-873.16-801.06470.55-40.5651.0258.5973.12-7.84-65.74
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)β€”-91.141.27β€”12.509.21β€”β€”β€”
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)3.9511.8112.8561.739.549.289.878.0110.91
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.810.790.750.730.650.620.620.521.46
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)22.84β€”17.7816.58-18.28-60.9451.7718.52-197.38
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)β€”17.3715.6866.589.448.408.106.807.22
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)57.941209.39194.32105.38103.47100.93105.38-31.73-360.48
Debt to Equity Ratio17.180.390.320.250.190.200.190.231.33

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ FB BANCORP INC (FBLA) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

FB Bancorp Inc. operates as a community-focused banking institution through a traditional deposit-and-loan value chain. Customer deposits fund the balance sheet, while lending activities (typically including commercial and consumer credit) generate interest income. The spread between earning asset yields and the cost of deposits drives core profitability, supplemented by fee income tied to banking services (such as account-related and lending-related fees).

The investment character of a banking franchise is therefore rooted in (1) the durability and pricing of deposits, (2) the quality and structure of loan underwriting, and (3) the operational efficiency of transforming funding into risk-adjusted earning assets within regulatory capital constraints.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Net interest income (NII) is the primary monetisation engine. NII reflects both the level of interest-earning assets and the net interest spread after deposit costs. It is influenced by the mix of assets (loan types vs. securities), pricing discipline, and competitive deposit dynamics.

Non-interest income typically provides incremental diversification through fees tied to deposit accounts, lending origination/servicing, and other routine banking services. For community banks, these sources usually support margins but rarely replace NII as the dominant driver.

Credit and operating discipline act as β€œhidden” revenue components. Expected credit losses and non-performing asset levels reduce earnings, while efficiency (operating leverage, staffing, and technology costs) determines how much NII converts into bottom-line profitability. The bank’s monetisation model is thus best understood as: spread generation minus credit costs minus operating expenses.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Cost of deposits as a structural advantage. A community bank can build a deposit franchise anchored in customer relationships, local reputation, and account stickiness. When deposit pricing remains disciplined relative to asset yields, the institution can protect the funding advantage across rate and competition cycles.

Credit culture and underwriting discipline as a moat. The sustainability of risk-adjusted returns depends on consistent underwriting standards, the ability to manage concentration risk, and proactive credit monitoring. Over time, a strong credit culture reduces the probability and severity of losses, supporting earnings stability and capital preservation.

Regulatory moat and balance-sheet constraints. Banking is regulated with capital, liquidity, and safety-and-soundness requirements that raise barriers to entry. These constraints limit β€œeasy” replication of deposit scale or lending capacity, especially for new entrants without established compliance, governance, and risk-management systems.

  • Competitive benchmarking (industry peers): Regions Financial Corp. (RF), Synovus Financial Corp. (SNV), and First Horizon Corp. (FHN).

FB Bancorp’s positioning is best compared against regional and community banking models that compete for deposits and lend to overlapping customer bases. Larger regional banks and diversified financial institutions can offer broader product suites and scale advantages, but community-oriented franchises often compete more effectively on relationship-driven deposit depth, underwriting selectivity, and local market expertiseβ€”where management can translate information advantages into better credit outcomes.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Deposit franchise expansion and higher-quality funding. Over a 5–10 year horizon, sustainable growth for a bank franchise typically comes from growing core deposits and improving deposit mix (lower-cost and more stable balances). Growth in stable funding supports loan growth without disproportionately increasing funding costs.

Credit normalization paired with disciplined origination. Banking growth is not linear; it follows credit cycles. A bank with disciplined underwriting can expand during periods of competitive pricing while limiting downside exposure, allowing for compounding of franchise value when credit conditions improve.

Share gains in underserved segments. Community banks often capture incremental business in middle-market lending, local commercial relationships, and customer segments that value service responsiveness. Where competitors retreat or standardize underwriting, relationship-driven banks can increase penetration.

Operational efficiency and technology scaling. Efficiency gains (process automation, digital account servicing, reduced cost-to-serve) support the conversion of revenue into earnings, improving the bank’s capacity to invest in growth while maintaining profitability through cycles.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Net interest margin and balance-sheet sensitivity. Mismatches in rate sensitivity between assets and liabilities can compress spreads during shifts in interest-rate expectations.
  • Credit cycle risk and concentration exposure. Loan portfolio concentrations (by industry, geography, or borrower profile) can amplify losses during localized downturns.
  • Deposit competition and funding-cost pressure. Competitors offering aggressive pricing can raise the cost of deposits, reducing spread and lowering profitability.
  • Regulatory capital and liquidity requirements. Changes in bank regulation, stress testing expectations, or capital rules can constrain growth or require balance-sheet adjustments.
  • Operational and technology execution risk. Banking infrastructure requires resilient systems, cybersecurity, and robust risk governance; failures can impair franchise value and raise compliance costs.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

Banking franchises are commonly valued through price-to-book (P/B), tangible book measures, and earnings-based multiples that reflect growth, credit quality, and efficiency. The market typically pays for: (1) durable returns on tangible equity, (2) conservative credit outcomes (limited charge-offs and controllable provisions), and (3) a credible deposit franchise that supports earning-asset growth without excessive funding cost escalation.

Key valuation drivers moving the needle include changes in net interest spread, asset quality (delinquencies, charge-offs, and reserve adequacy), operating efficiency (cost discipline), and capital generation (earnings retention and risk-weighted asset management).

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

FB Bancorp’s long-term investment case rests on the durability of its deposit franchise, the strength of its credit culture, and the protections embedded in regulatory and operational infrastructure. For a community banking model, the central question is not growth at any cost, but whether management can compound risk-adjusted returnsβ€”by protecting funding costs, maintaining underwriting discipline, and efficiently converting net interest income into sustainable earnings across credit and rate cycles.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

πŸ“° Market News & Coverage

6 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for FBLA.

defenseworld.netβ€’2026-03-29

FB Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBLA) Short Interest Update

FB Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) was the recipient of a large increase in short interest during the month of March. As of March 13th, there was short interest totaling 466,848 shares, an increase of 39.4% from the February 26th total of 334,836 shares. Based on an average trading volume of 119,355 shares,

defenseworld.netβ€’2026-02-20

Contrasting FB Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBLA) & WesBanco (NASDAQ:WSBC)

WesBanco (NASDAQ: WSBC - Get Free Report) and FB Bancorp (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings. Analyst Recommendations This is a breakdown of current ratings

defenseworld.netβ€’2026-02-10

Analyzing Thomasville Bancshares (OTCMKTS:THVB) & FB Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBLA)

FB Bancorp (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) and Thomasville Bancshares (OTCMKTS:THVB - Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings. Profitability This table compares FB Bancorp and

defenseworld.netβ€’2026-01-27

FB Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBLA) Shares Down 0.5% – Here’s What Happened

FB Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) was down 0.5% during mid-day trading on Monday. The stock traded as low as $12.71 and last traded at $12.74. Approximately 40,460 shares changed hands during mid-day trading, a decline of 54% from the average daily volume of 88,696 shares. The stock had previously closed at

defenseworld.netβ€’2025-12-18

Head to Head Analysis: Peoples Financial (OTCMKTS:PFBX) versus FB Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBLA)

FB Bancorp (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) and Peoples Financial (OTCMKTS:PFBX - Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations. Profitability This table compares FB Bancorp and

defenseworld.netβ€’2025-12-17

Analyzing Colony Bankcorp (NYSE:CBAN) and FB Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBLA)

Colony Bankcorp (NYSE: CBAN - Get Free Report) and FB Bancorp (NASDAQ: FBLA - Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership. Institutional and Insider Ownership 50.4% of Colony

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"FBLA reported Q1’26 Revenue of $17.41M and Net Income of $0.12M (EPS $0.0073). On a YoY basis, Revenue rose to $17.41M vs. $20.89M in Q1’25 (-16.7%), while Net Income improved from $0.705M to $0.119M (down ~83.1%). QoQ, Revenue jumped from $3.71M in Q4’25 to $17.41M (+369.3%), but Net Income improved only slightly from -$1.41M in Q4’25 to +$0.12M. Profitability was weak in the latest quarter: gross margin was ~71.0%, but operating margin was only ~3.5% and net margin fell to ~0.7% (down sharply vs. Q3’25 net margin ~4.7%). The earnings profile appears heavily affected by non-core items and quarter-to-quarter expense dynamics (interest income is large relative to operating results, and operating income in Q1’26 is only ~$0.61M). Cash flow data is inconsistent/limited in Q1’26 (reported operating cash flow and FCF are shown as 0). Balance sheet resilience remains mixed: Total Assets were $1.27B with Equity of $0.30B, but cash dropped materially from Q4’25 ($60.3M) to $6.2M. Total shareholder returns look strong given the stock’s momentum: +34.5% over 1 year, plus a negligible dividend yield (~0.02%)."

Revenue Growth

Fair

YoY Revenue declined from $20.89M (Q1’25) to $17.41M (Q1’26), -16.7%. QoQ Revenue surged from $3.71M (Q4’25) to $17.41M, +369.3%, indicating volatility rather than a steady growth run-rate.

Profitability

Neutral

Net margin deteriorated to ~0.7% in Q1’26 from ~3.4% in Q1’25 and ~4.7% in Q3’25. Operating margin was ~3.5% in Q1’26 versus ~40.5% (Q4’25, anomalous due to line-item effects) and ~5.8% (Q3’25).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow/FCF are reported as 0, limiting confidence in cash generation. Prior quarters showed variability (e.g., CFO ~ $14.2M in Q4’25). No dividends or buybacks are indicated.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Equity was $297.7M in Q1’26 (vs. $314.5M in Q4’25), broadly stable but slightly down. Total Assets were $1.27B. However, cash fell sharply to $6.2M from $60.3M, suggesting reduced near-term liquidity.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Price momentum is strong: +34.5% 1-year change. Dividend yield is minimal (~0.02%) and buybacks are not evidenced, so total return is primarily capital appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

No price target is provided. Valuation metrics shown (very high P/E due to low earnings) suggest elevated sensitivity to quarterly earnings outcomes rather than stable profitability.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

πŸ“‹ Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for FBLA.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
πŸ“

SEC Filings (FBLA)

Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” FB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (FBLA) Financial Profile