Fox Factory Holding Corp.

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Market Cap

Fox Factory Holding Corp. has a market capitalization of $754.8M.

Price: $18.00

0.19 (1.07%)

Market Cap: 754.85M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Michael C. Dennison

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Auto - Parts

IPO Date: 2013-08-08

Website: https://www.ridefox.com

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) - Company Information

Market Cap: 754.85M|Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Company Profile

Fox Factory Holding Corp. is a global enterprise dedicated to the design, engineering, production, and distribution of advanced ride dynamics solutions. The company's product line features sophisticated front fork and rear suspension systems for a variety of bicycles, encompassing mid-to-high-end mountain, road, and electric bikes. In addition to suspension components, it offers a comprehensive range of performance cycling accessories, including wheels, cranks, chainrings, pedals, handlebars, stems, and seat posts. For motorized vehicles, Fox Factory develops specialized products catering to diverse applications such as side-by-side vehicles, on-road automobiles (with or without off-road capabilities), dedicated off-road vehicles, all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles, and various specialty sectors like military, motorcycles, and commercial trucks. The company also sells aftermarket versions of its products to a broad network of dealers and distributors. Its powered vehicle offerings are marketed under prominent brands including FOX, BDS Suspension, Zone Offroad, JKS Manufacturing, RT Pro UTV, 4x4 Posi-Lok, Ridetech, Tuscany, Outside Van, and SCA. Meanwhile, its bicycle-related products are available through the FOX, Race Face, Easton Cycling, and Marzocchi brands. Established in 2007, Fox Factory Holding Corp. maintains its corporate headquarters in Duluth, Georgia.

Analyst Sentiment

56%
Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $21.33

▲ +18.5% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$20

Median

$20

High Bound

$24

Average

$21

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$21.33
▲ +18.50% Upside
Low Target
$20.00
11% Risk
Median Target
$20.00
11% Mid
High Target
$24.00
33% Max
Consensus
Buy
9 / 18 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MApr 3, 2026Jan 2, 2026Oct 3, 2025Jul 4, 2025Apr 4, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 27, 2024Jun 28, 2024
Market Cap ($M)7557027281,0701,1708741,2621,7432,008
Enterprise Value ($M)1,4021,3491,4501,7101,8041,5321,9122,4392,700
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-2.51-11.65-0.63-421.05106.58-0.84-2225.7495.0292.67
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-5.54-1058.6019.08-1.3531.1520.58
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.511.902.022.843.122.463.584.855.76
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.141.071.091.121.220.931.051.461.68
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)63.02-32.6964.16-435.3447.67-134.4418.09494.59130.37
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)3.664.024.544.814.315.426.797.75
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-7.5878.58-5.0941.4343.65-6.7161.5060.8268.69
Debt to Equity Ratio-3.501.061.160.740.750.770.600.660.65

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP (FOXF) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Fox Factory Holding Corp designs and manufactures high-performance suspension and related components used in off-road bicycles and powersports motorcycles, with additional exposure to replacement parts and service. The value chain runs from (1) engineering and product development through (2) precision manufacturing of suspension systems and componentry, (3) distribution to bike/motorcycle OEMs and dealer networks, and (4) aftermarket demand for replacement parts that maintains an installed base on the road/trail.

The business model blends OEM supply (sales tied to new vehicle builds) with aftermarket durability (sales tied to service, wear, and performance upgrades). This mix matters because aftermarket activity tends to be less dependent on annual OEM build rates, and it extends product lifetime value beyond initial purchases.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is monetized primarily through:

  • OEM sales: Suspension components and related parts sold into bicycle and powersports motorcycle platforms. Monetisation is driven by specification wins, product performance, and qualification by OEMs.
  • Aftermarket and replacement parts: Serviceable components and upgrades sold through distributors and dealers, monetised through the installed base.
  • Component breadth across applications: Product families span shocks/forks and related suspension hardware, supporting cross-sell within the dealer network and improving revenue resilience across model cycles.

Margin drivers generally flow from premium product positioning, engineering-led differentiation, supply chain execution, and aftermarket mix. Operating leverage can emerge when fixed costs are leveraged over stable production volumes and when aftermarket contribution rises relative to OEM demand.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Fox Factory’s core moat is a combination of switching costs and installed-base economics, underpinned by engineering and qualification barriers.

  • Installed-base driven demand (soft switching costs): Suspension components are serviceable over a long lifespan. Repair and refresh cycles create recurring aftermarket exposure without requiring contractual subscriptions.
  • Qualification and specification barriers (hard switching costs for OEMs): OEMs face testing, compatibility, reliability, and warranty implications. Once designs are qualified, suppliers typically benefit from longer specification retention than a pure commodity parts model.
  • Performance and tuning know-how (intangible differentiation): Product performance targets—ride characteristics, durability, and technology integration—are difficult to replicate quickly, especially for premium segments where testing and iterative refinement are required.

Competitive benchmarking (key rivals):

  • SRAM / RockShox (bicycle suspension): RockShox competes directly for premium MTB suspension specifications, with strong brand presence in bikes.
  • Öhlins (powersports premium suspension): Öhlins competes on high-end motorcycle performance and premium tolerances.
  • KYB (broader powersports suspension): KYB competes across a wider product spectrum, often balancing volume and cost with varying tier exposure.

Fox Factory’s industry focus emphasizes high-performance suspension and components across both MTB and motorcycle end markets, positioning it to participate in premiumisation and maintain an aftermarket bridge through serviceable installed bases—an advantage that differs from competitors with narrower focus or less installed-base monetisation.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Premiumisation of suspension technology: Increasing consumer preference for higher performance, adjustability, and durability supports unit growth and mix improvement.
  • E-bikes and gravity/enduro utilization: Expansion in high-use riding formats tends to increase replacement and service frequency for suspension hardware.
  • Aftermarket durability: As the installed base grows, replacement parts and upgrades become a steadier contributor, supporting earnings stability through cycles.
  • OEM platform cycle expansion: New product platforms and model refreshes can support specification wins when Fox’s technology and manufacturing reliability align with OEM qualification needs.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the TAM expands through the combination of (1) more riders/vehicles and (2) higher content per vehicle (premium component intensity), with aftermarket acting as a compounding mechanism as fleets age and service demand scales.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • End-market cyclicality: OEM build cycles and discretionary upgrade spending can soften during economic downturns, impacting revenue volumes.
  • Inventory and working-capital volatility: Distributor and OEM inventory levels can affect sell-through and production planning, influencing margins and cash conversion.
  • Supply chain and component cost inflation: Precision manufacturing can be exposed to lead times, commodity inputs, and logistics disruptions.
  • Competitive pricing and technology parity: If rivals compress pricing or close the technology gap, share gains may slow and margins can face pressure.
  • Product quality and warranty risk: Suspension products carry safety and performance expectations; quality issues can create reputational and financial costs.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The equity is typically valued on cash generation potential and quality of earnings, often reflected through EV/EBITDA and discounting earnings durability via FCF yield or price-to-sales frameworks. Key valuation sensitivities generally include:

  • Aftermarket mix and gross margin stability (premiumisation and installed-base monetisation).
  • Operating leverage as fixed costs are absorbed over stable production runs.
  • Working-capital discipline (inventory and receivables management affecting FCF conversion).
  • Evidence of specification wins and retention with major OEM platforms.

Markets typically reward companies that demonstrate resilient aftermarket economics and sustained premium product positioning despite OEM cyclicality.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Fox Factory’s long-term thesis rests on premium, engineering-led suspension differentiation that translates into specification qualification for OEMs and monetisation of a serviceable installed base through aftermarket replacement demand. The resulting combination of soft switching costs, durable aftermarket economics, and performance-driven product barriers can support steady compounding over a full cycle, provided the company maintains manufacturing execution, share gains, and margin discipline amid end-market cyclicality.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for FOXF.

globenewswire.com2026-07-16

Fox Factory Holding Corp. Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call

DULUTH, Ga., July 16, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fox Factory Holding Corp. (Nasdaq: FOXF) (the “Company”), a premium brand and a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacturing of performance-defining products and systems for customers worldwide, will announce results for the second quarter ended July 3, 2026, on Thursday, August 6, 2026, after the market close.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-03

Fox Factory Holding Corp Is Too Cheap To Ignore

Fox Factory Holding Corp remains a 'buy' despite recent underperformance versus the S&P 500, supported by aggressive cost-cutting and attractive valuation. Revenue for FOXF rose 3.9% year-over-year in Q1 2026, but profitability metrics declined due to segment-specific pressures and tariffs. Management targets $50 million in cost savings for 2026, aiming to boost EBITDA above last year's $168.4 million even as revenue declines.

gurufocus.com2026-05-29

Fox Factory Holding Corp (FOXF) Stock Down 4.2% -- Now Undervalued? GF Score: 71/100

On May 29, 2026, Fox Factory Holding Corp (FOXF) shares fell 4.2% today, bringing the current price to $18.06. Over the past year, the stock has experienced sig

zacks.com2026-05-07

Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) Beats Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates

Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.18 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.09 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.23 per share a year ago.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-07

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-07

Here's What Key Metrics Tell Us About Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) Q1 Earnings

The headline numbers for Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

globenewswire.com2026-05-07

Fox Factory Holding Corp. Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2026 Financial Results

DULUTH, Ga., May 07, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF) (“FOX” or the “Company”), a premium brand and a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacturing of performance-defining products and systems for customers worldwide, today reported financial results for the first fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2026.

gurufocus.com2026-04-27

Fox Factory Holding Corp (FOXF) Shares Fall 3.0% -- What GF Score of 70 Tells Investors

On April 27, 2026, Fox Factory Holding Corp (FOXF) shares fell 3.0% today, bringing the current price to $17.15. Over the past year, the stock has experienced a

defenseworld.net2026-04-27

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ:FOXF) Receives Average Recommendation of “Hold” from Analysts

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF - Get Free Report) has received an average recommendation of "Hold" from the seven analysts that are presently covering the firm, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, three have given a hold rating, two have given a buy rating and one has

globenewswire.com2026-04-16

Fox Factory Holding Corp. Announces First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call

DULUTH, Ga., April 16, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fox Factory Holding Corp. (Nasdaq: FOXF) (the “Company”), a premium brand and a global leader in the design, engineering and manufacturing of performance-defining products and systems for customers worldwide, will announce results for the first quarter ended April 3, 2026, on Thursday, May 7, 2026, after the market close.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-06

Fox Factory: Still Offers A Nice Long-Term Ride Despite The Tough Road

Fox Factory Holding Corp. remains a "Buy" despite recent share price underperformance and mixed financial results. Cost-cutting and asset sales are expected to drive EBITDA up to $174–$203 million in 2026, offsetting revenue declines. FOXF trades at attractive absolute and relative valuations, ranking among the cheapest peers on key multiples.

defenseworld.net2026-03-31

Volcon (NASDAQ:EMPD) and Fox Factory (NASDAQ:FOXF) Head-To-Head Analysis

Volcon (NASDAQ: EMPD - Get Free Report) and Fox Factory (NASDAQ: FOXF - Get Free Report) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability. Risk and Volatility Volcon has a beta of

defenseworld.net2026-03-15

ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC Purchases 522,391 Shares of Fox Factory Holding Corp. $FOXF

ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC increased its holdings in shares of Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF) by 72.9% during the undefined quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 1,239,216 shares of the company's stock after buying an additional 522,391 shares during the quarter. ArrowMark

seekingalpha.com2026-02-27

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-02-26

Compared to Estimates, Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) Q4 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

Although the revenue and EPS for Fox Factory Holding (FOXF) give a sense of how its business performed in the quarter ended December 2025, it might be worth considering how some key metrics compare with Wall Street estimates and the year-ago numbers.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-04-03

"FOXF reported Q1’26 revenue of $368.7M and net loss of ($15.0)M (EPS: -$0.36). On a YoY basis, revenue was down 2.6% (vs. $355.0M in Q1’25) while net income improved from a loss of ($259.7)M to ($15.0)M (i.e., a large profitability turnaround). Sequentially, revenue rose 2.1% QoQ (from $361.1M in Q4’25), but net income deteriorated materially (from a loss of ($287.0)M in Q4’25 to ($15.0)M in Q1’26, reflecting a step-up in earnings though still negative). Profitability was weak: gross margin increased to 28.9% (from 28.3% in Q4’25), but operating margin remained near breakeven at 1.6% and the company still posted negative net margin (-4.1%). Cash flow quality is mixed—Q1 operating cash flow was ($16.1)M and free cash flow was ($21.5)M, indicating earnings are not yet converting to cash. The balance sheet remains relatively resilient: total equity increased to ~$659M while cash decreased to ~$54M; leverage appears contained with short-term debt only ($26.9M) and no long-term debt reported. Shareholder returns look muted on momentum: price is $17.37 and 1-year change is -9.8% (no >20% momentum). There is no dividend and no buybacks reported this quarter. Overall sentiment/valuation is supported by a low P/S (~1.9x) but profitability drag limits upside."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue improved to $368.7M (+2.1% from $361.1M). YoY revenue slightly declined to $368.7M (-2.6% vs. $355.0M).

Profitability

Neutral

Gross margin expanded (28.9% vs 28.3% QoQ), but net margin is still negative (-4.1%). YoY net income improved sharply (loss narrowed from -$259.7M to -$15.0M), yet EPS remains -$0.36.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow was ($16.1)M and free cash flow was ($21.5)M, indicating weak earnings-to-cash conversion versus recent periods.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Equity is stable-to-up (~$659M) and Q1 shows no long-term debt; only short-term debt of ~$26.9M. Cash declined to ~$54M, but the reported leverage looks manageable.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

1-year price performance is -9.8%, and there is no dividend or buyback activity reported this quarter. Total return momentum is negative.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus target ($21.5) is above the current price ($17.37), implying upside (~+24%), but the valuation support is constrained by persistent net losses and cash outflows.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

FOXF delivered a strong Q1 against a still-challenging demand and cost backdrop, with revenue of $368.7M (+3.9% YoY) and adjusted EBITDA of $35.7M, both at/above the top end of guidance. However, gross margin dropped to 28.9% (down from 30.9%) due to unmitigated tariffs and mix—signaling that cost-out is early-cycle and not yet fully offsetting tariff and input pressures. Management’s core thesis is that the February plan is landing: Phase 1 carryover is flowing, Phase 2 cost actions will meaningfully benefit in 2H, and the Phoenix divestiture closed with proceeds earmarked for debt reduction. Guidance is reaffirmed, targeting FY26 adjusted EBITDA of $174M–$203M and ~200 bps margin expansion at the midpoint, weighted to the back half. Near-term headwinds center on aluminum-driven F-150 upfit volume disruption (not recoverable in Q2), bike-channel volatility, and timing of Marzocchi launches, partially offset by OEM-driven upfit program progress and aggressive dealer expansion.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • PVG net sales +17.4% YoY to $143.4M, with Q4-to-Q1 timing benefits; underlying automotive aftermarket resilience and OEM onboarding continuing.
  • PVD upfitting program momentum: started shipping meaningful volume late Q1; “on schedule” progress into Q2 from supply-chain normalization.
  • Dealer expansion drive in last 60 days: added 135+ new dealers; >60 new dealers/month run-rate to accelerate long-term upfit distribution.
  • SSG bike stabilization: forecasting stable to slightly up, supported by expanding portfolio and new-customer wins; expected sequential improvement in Q2 then into normalization.
  • Marzocchi: softball >500% growth since 2024 and gaining meaningful share; Q2 launches shifted to Q3 due to soft retail/bike channel volumes.

Business Development

  • PVD: announced a similar OEM strategic relationship to a prior performance-upgrades program—“another major automotive OEM” (name not provided); integrated OEM marketing/sales + Fox innovation tied to dealer ordering.
  • PVD go-to-market model: OEM “booking systems” and drop-ship process for upfit kits to Fox then to dealers (described as a new channel/structure leveraging existing OEM bailment relationships).
  • Powersports: destocking/inventory rebalancing taking shape across diversified major OEM partners; Q2 mix shifting between OEMs to balance allocation.
  • PVG: closed divestiture of Phoenix, Arizona operations in Q1, including Upfit, UTV, Geiser, and Shock Therapy businesses.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue $368.7M (+3.9% YoY) at high end of guidance; adjusted EBITDA $35.7M exceeded the high end of guidance.
  • Gross margin fell to 28.9% from 30.9% YoY, driven by unmitigated tariffs and product-line mix shifts; also noted higher steel/aluminum cost pressure building into Q2.
  • Adjusted operating expenses were $85.5M (23.2% of sales) vs $84.4M (23.8% of sales) prior year quarter—early cost-optimization benefits.
  • Tax benefit declined to $0.6M (from $3.6M), pressuring adjusted EPS to $0.18 vs $0.23 in Q1 prior year.
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin was 9.7% (stable sequentially with Q4 2025); management expects expansion through the year with Phase 2 benefits and tariff anniversary effects in 2H.
  • Guidance reaffirmed: FY26 net sales $1.328B–$1.416B; adjusted EBITDA $174M–$203M. Midpoint implies ~200 bps adjusted EBITDA margin improvement vs FY25.
  • Q2 outlook: net sales $343M–$365M; adjusted EBITDA $32M–$40M, reflecting discrete items shifting into Q3 (Marzocchi delayed launch; bike supplier disruption) plus lower F-150 unit volume from aluminum supply disruption (not expected to recover).
  • Tariff regime update: IEPA replaced by Section 232; aggregate Section 232 impact expected approximately neutral in 2026 excluding Marzocchi; Marzocchi bath tariff rate structurally improved from 22% to 10% (benefit partially offset by demand/inventory dynamics).

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Debt increased ~$15M sequentially to $688.2M at quarter end; driver cited as working-capital timing (seasonally heavy Q1 plus incentive comp payouts and first-half 2026 tariff cash impacts).
  • Credit agreement amended to expand covenant headroom and provide additional financial flexibility; management stated leverage around 3.77x at quarter end with comfortable covenant position.
  • Capital expenditures $5.4M (~1.5% of revenues) vs full-year target ~2% of revenues.
  • No share repurchase amounts were disclosed in the transcript.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Transformation cost program: committed to ~ $50M savings in 2026 split into $10M Phase 1 carryover and ~$40M Phase 2 actions; Phase 2 expected to layer more heavily in Q3/Q4.
  • Portfolio tightening: Phoenix divestiture closed; proceeds dedicated to debt reduction.
  • Operating discipline/restructuring: early benefits reflected in adjusted operating expense ratio improvement (23.8% to 23.2% YoY).
  • Supply chain normalization: PVG automotive OEM issues and PVD supply constraints cited as improving; PVD upfit volume expected to improve as shipments ramp in Q2.
  • Marzocchi product timing: shifted planned Q2 product launches into Q3 due to softly trending bike volumes and retail partner alignment.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • FY26 adjusted EBITDA target maintained at $174M–$203M; margin expansion weighted to second half, targeting ~200 bps improvement at midpoint vs FY25.
  • Implied ramp commentary: management expects cost plan benefits and operational improvements to support mid-teens performance in Q3/Q4; Q1 ran about $4M above midpoint expectations.
  • Q2 outlook explicitly incorporates (1) discrete items shifting to Q3 and (2) lower F-150 upfit unit volume not expected to be recovered; back-half F-150 volumes expected intact.
  • Tariff dynamics: Section 232 largely neutral overall in 2026 excluding Marzocchi; any IEPA recovery not included and recognized only upon receipt.
  • Tariff benefit from Marzocchi: prior inventory benefit expected to phase in as prior tariffed inventory works through P&L; management suggested tariff relief could appear late 2026 and be low single digits at best.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Unmitigated tariffs and product-mix shifts drove gross margin down 200 bps YoY in Q1 (28.9% vs 30.9%).
  • Higher steel/aluminum costs across segments with pressure building into Q2; profit optimization initiative sized to absorb within Feb framework.
  • Consumer discretionary restraint cited in powersports; near-term cautious outlook despite structural improvement vs prior year and OEM destocking progress.
  • Industry-wide aluminum supply disruption impacting Ford F-150 Lariat/XLT upfit chassis availability; Q2 volume impact not expected to recover (back-half volumes intact).
  • SSG/bike: channel inventory volatility and muted demand signals; temporary disruption tied to challenges in the Middle East affecting some suppliers/customers.
  • Marzocchi: inventory in channel/overflow slowed Q1; bike volumes trending softly requiring launch timing shift into Q3.
  • Tariff recovery uncertainty: potential recoveries under IEPA framework not included due to uncertain timing/amount/allocation across customer/distributor/supply chain.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Margin ramp math and aggressiveness: Analyst questioned implied back-half EBITDA margins vs 200 bps full-year improvement. Management linked ramp to incremental AAG improvements (PVD and Marzocchi), Phase 2 cost plan benefits accelerating into Q3/Q4, and reiterated Q1 running ~$4M above midpoint expectation.
  • Marzocchi outlook and strategic alternatives: Analyst asked whether Marzocchi is down in the quarter and if strategic alternatives remain on the table. Management confirmed Marzocchi down in Q1 due to channel inventory overflow, emphasized running the business hard with leadership fully engaged, and highlighted excitement around softball performance and upcoming Q3 launches.
  • Tariffs and embedded impact clarity: Analyst sought confirmation that core business is “a wash” while Marzocchi improved, including what remains embedded from prior $15M net tariff impact. Management affirmed ~$15M net impact still in 1H (felt in Q1 and seen in Q2), noted Section 232 largely neutral for PVG/AAG, Marzocchi benefit from tariff rate drop (22% to 10%) likely shows as inventory phases through late in 2026, low single digits at best.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the FOXF Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for FOXF.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (FOXF)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Financial Profile