Farmland Partners Inc.

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Market Cap

Farmland Partners Inc. has a market capitalization of $407.9M.

Price: $9.35

-0.07 (-0.74%)

Market Cap: 407.95M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Luca Fabbri

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: REIT - Specialty

IPO Date: 2014-04-11

Website: https://www.farmlandpartners.com

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) - Company Information

Market Cap: 407.95M|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

Farmland Partners Inc. functions as an internally managed real estate enterprise, primarily focused on acquiring and holding premium North American agricultural land. The company also provides secured loans to farmers, collateralized by their farm real estate. As of the most recent disclosure, its expansive portfolio includes approximately 155,000 acres distributed across 16 U.S. states, covering significant agricultural areas from Alabama to Virginia. This diversified land base supports nearly 26 different crop varieties and is utilized by over 100 distinct agricultural tenants. Farmland Partners Inc. chose to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the fiscal year that ended December 31, 2014.

Analyst Sentiment

60%
Buy

From 3 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $17.00

▲ +81.8% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$17

Median

$17

High Bound

$17

Average

$17

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$17.00
▲ +81.82% Upside
Low Target
$17.00
82% Risk
Median Target
$17.00
82% Mid
High Target
$17.00
82% Max
Consensus
Hold
6 / 15 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 30, 2026Mar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)408420485428470523508561500
Enterprise Value ($M)621633699580627665689686839
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)15.6434.08280.754.66-906.6716.9399.912.43121.51
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.05-69.950.047.43
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)7.6644.6748.0219.0241.7652.4949.5826.1237.54
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.880.911.050.931.051.121.061.160.99
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)22.64-131.1160.7828.19-240.59-239.3679.8038.38-116.80
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)67.3369.2225.7755.7166.7767.1731.9663.00
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)15.84101.43163.2323.22169.7758.59116.3110.6295.78
Debt to Equity Ratio5.430.490.500.350.380.420.420.420.68

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 FARMLAND PARTNERS INC (FPI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Farmland Partners Inc (FPI) acquires and owns agricultural land in the United States and monetizes it through long-term leases to operating farmers and agricultural tenants. The firm’s core value creation comes from (1) selecting farmland with durable productivity characteristics (soil quality, drainage/topography, and workable water access where relevant), (2) structuring lease arrangements that translate land productivity into rental cash flows, and (3) maintaining asset performance through active property management and landlord responsibilities.

The customer “stickiness” is less about software-style switching costs and more about asset specificity: farmland is difficult to redeploy, farm systems are adapted to field layouts and soil conditions, and tenants generally prefer continuity when land suitability and operational infrastructure fit their production plans. This creates recurring visibility to rental revenue, with periodic lease renewals and asset repositioning supporting long-term compounding.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

FPI’s monetisation is primarily rental-based. Lease revenue typically includes a fixed component and, in many agricultural lease structures, can incorporate variable elements tied to agricultural productivity or crop outcomes. The key margin drivers are:

  • Lease economics and rent durability: Rental cash flows are supported by long-lived farmland assets and lease contracts that can preserve income through varying parts of the production cycle.
  • Property-level yield support: Land quality and operational fit influence tenant demand and the ability to negotiate or renew terms.
  • Operating cost control: As a landlord, FPI’s expense discipline (taxes, insurance, repairs, and property management) materially affects net income conversion.
  • Capital discipline and accretive acquisitions: When acquisitions are underwritten to a spread versus borrowing and expected lease yields, the business can grow without proportionally scaling leverage.

Because the firm owns physical productive assets rather than relying on recurring customer contracts, the monetisation model is best viewed as a blend of real-asset rent yield and appraisal-driven value realization over time.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

FPI’s competitive advantage is anchored in real-asset scarcity and underwriting discipline rather than proprietary technology. The most important “moat” characteristics are:

  • Cost/Capital Advantage in Acquisition Underwriting: Scale and access to capital markets can improve sourcing quality, reduce average acquisition friction, and support disciplined purchase prices—critical in farmland where competition is intense and land availability is limited.
  • Asset Specificity (Tenant Retention Dynamics): Productive farmland is not fungible. Field-level characteristics and water/irrigation suitability reduce the ease of switching for operators, supporting lease continuity and renewal leverage.
  • Process and Execution Intangibles: Farmland due diligence (soil and productivity assessment, water rights review, and long-term agronomic viability) is difficult to replicate quickly, and execution quality affects long-run cash yields and downstream maintenance needs.

Competitive benchmarking (industry peers):

  • Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND): Also focuses on agricultural land via leasing to operating farmers. FPI’s differentiation is its broader farmland platform and diversified crop/region orientation, which can reduce single-market dependence.
  • Institutional farmland managers (e.g., Hancock Natural Resource Group): Compete for large transactions and institutional mandates. These players may have different capital structures and longer-duration fund models; FPI competes through publicly traded liquidity, transparent underwriting, and REIT-style capital access.
  • Private farmland funds and syndicates: Often compete on sourcing and can bid aggressively for specific tracts. FPI’s process-driven underwriting and portfolio construction aim to mitigate overpay risk.

Compared with these rivals, FPI’s positioning emphasizes a repeatable acquisition-to-lease model backed by land-level productivity assessment and an emphasis on durable income characteristics, rather than purely opportunistic farmland flipping.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, FPI’s growth opportunity is primarily driven by real-asset demand fundamentals and the ability to recycle capital into productive land:

  • Food demand and long-run scarcity of arable land: Structural demand growth supports the value of productive farmland despite commodity-cycle fluctuations.
  • Biofuel and agricultural feedstock demand: Demand for crop inputs can sustain utilization rates and support rent frameworks tied to productivity.
  • Inflation-linked asset characteristics: Land ownership can benefit from inflationary pressure on replacement costs and long-run agricultural land values, subject to capitalization-rate movements.
  • Lease rate and renewal dynamics: Where land remains productive and tenant demand persists, renewals can translate into higher net income over time.
  • Operational/portfolio management and selective improvements: Targeted investments (for example, maintaining productive capability through drainage, access, and farm infrastructure stewardship) can support long-run tenant satisfaction and cash flow durability.
  • Capital recycling at disciplined spreads: Growth depends on acquiring land at attractive expected yields and financing it sensibly, enabling compounding without excessive leverage build.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity and crop volatility: Agricultural economics can pressure tenant profitability and affect rent structures with variable components or renewal pricing power.
  • Weather, drought, and water-rights constraints: Water availability and agronomic disruptions can reduce productivity and tenant willingness to pay.
  • Regulatory and environmental risk: Changes in water regulations, land-use rules, pesticide/fertilizer requirements, and environmental compliance can increase costs or limit operational flexibility.
  • Interest rate and financing risk: As a capital-intensive real-asset holder, FPI is exposed to borrowing costs and refinancing conditions, which can influence acquisition capacity and valuation assumptions.
  • Liquidity and valuation uncertainty: Farmland is not readily liquid; appraisal methodologies and capitalization rates can move with broader macro conditions.
  • Tenant concentration and credit performance: Lease performance depends on operator resilience; underwriting quality and tenant diversification remain important.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically frames farmland REIT valuation through a real-asset lens rather than purely operating multiple logic. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Net asset value (NAV) / land value appraisals: Changes in farmland value expectations can drive investor perception of long-term intrinsic value.
  • Cap rate and discount-rate dynamics: Real estate valuation frameworks respond to interest rates and required yields, affecting implied land values.
  • Cash yield and net rent sustainability: Investors look for stable net operating performance, supported by lease durability and expense control.
  • Capital allocation quality: The spread between acquisition yields and financing costs determines whether growth is accretive over time.

Accordingly, the principal “needle movers” are the market’s view of capitalization rates, the durability of rental cash flows through agricultural cycles, and confidence in prudent, spread-positive acquisitions.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

FPI’s long-term investment case rests on owning scarce, productive farmland and monetizing it through lease structures that translate asset quality into recurring rental cash flows. The durable advantage is structural: farmland’s specificity and scarcity, combined with process-driven underwriting and disciplined capital allocation, can support compounding across cycles—provided weather, regulatory, financing, and tenant-credit risks are carefully managed.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for FPI.

marketbeat.com2026-07-31

Farmland Partners Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

Farmland Partners NYSE: FPI reported higher adjusted funds from operations per share in the second quarter of 2026 and modestly raised the low end of its full-year AFFO outlook, while management said it continues to evaluate non-core asset sales and remains cautious about agricultural lease renewals amid pressure on farm-sector finances.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-30

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-07-29

Farmland Partners (FPI) Beats Q2 FFO and Revenue Estimates

Farmland Partners (FPI) came out with quarterly funds from operations (FFO) of $0.04 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.03 per share. This compares to FFO of $0.03 per share a year ago.

businesswire.com2026-07-29

Farmland Partners Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI) (“FPI” or the “Company”) today reported financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Selected Highlights For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, the Company: recorded net income of $3.1 million, or $0.07 per share available to common stockholders, compared to $7.8 million, or $0.15 per share available to common stockholders for the same period in 2025; recorded AFFO of $1.7 million, or $0.04 per share, compared to $1.3 million,.

businesswire.com2026-07-23

Farmland Partners Inc. Announces Date for Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI) (the “Company”) today announced it will release its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, after 5 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, and will host a conference call the following day, Thursday, July 30, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) to discuss the financial results and provide a company update. The call can be accessed live over the phone by dialing 1-833-461-5787 and using the conference ID 62407914.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-17

Inflation Reignites, Yields Spike

Surging oil prices and hotter inflation reports reignited rate-hike concerns, sending Treasury yields to one-year highs as the Iran conflict remained stalemated despite the highly anticipated Trump-Xi summit.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-30

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-04-29

Farmland Partners (FPI) Q1 FFO and Revenues Beat Estimates

Farmland Partners (FPI) came out with quarterly funds from operations (FFO) of $0.05 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.04 per share. This compares to FFO of $0.05 per share a year ago.

businesswire.com2026-04-29

Farmland Partners Inc. Reports First Quarter 2026 Results

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI) (“FPI” or the “Company”) today reported financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026. Selected Highlights For the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Company: recorded net income of $0.6 million, or $0.01 per share available to common stockholders, compared to $2.1 million, or $0.03 per share available to common stockholders for the same period in 2025; recorded AFFO of $2.1 million, or $0.05 per share, compared to $2.3 million.

businesswire.com2026-04-23

Farmland Partners Inc. Announces Date for First Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI) (the “Company”) today announced it will release its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, after 5 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, and will host a conference call the following day, Thursday, April 30, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) to discuss the financial results and provide a company update. The call can be accessed live over the phone by dialing 1-800-715-9871 and using the conference ID 54722.

defenseworld.net2026-04-10

Accordant Advisory Group Inc Grows Stake in Farmland Partners Inc. $FPI

Accordant Advisory Group Inc grew its holdings in shares of Farmland Partners Inc. (NYSE: FPI) by 14.7% during the fourth quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 1,337,831 shares of the financial services provider's stock after purchasing an additional 171,813 shares during the

seekingalpha.com2026-03-24

REITs: A Regime Change Is Needed

REITs were rolling out of the gates in early-2026, coming back into favor amid a HALO trade (Heavy Assets, Low Obsolescence) after a half-decade of rate headwinds and unfavorable narrative. The oil price surge tied to the Iran conflict has complicated the rotation by sending rates soaring, yet REITs have remained surprisingly resilient in recent weeks, maintaining sizable year-to-date outperformance. REIT-rate correlations have eased in recent quarters, signaling a more favorable "regime change" where performance is driven by property fundamentals rather than macro forces, following a prolonged period of rate-dominated.

seekingalpha.com2026-03-19

The State Of REITs: March 2026 Edition

After a solid January performance, the REIT sector recovery gained steam in February with a stronger +3.70% return. Large cap REITs (+5.80%) led the REIT sector in February with strong gains from mid caps (+5.26%) and small caps (+4.94%). Micro caps (-6.12%) badly underperformed again in February. 71.71% of REIT securities had a positive total return in February.

seekingalpha.com2026-03-14

REITs May Be The Biggest Winner Of The Coming Market Shift

AI is beginning to disrupt far more industries than most investors expected. As barriers to entry collapse, many businesses could face lower growth and valuations. But one asset class may actually benefit from this shift.

defenseworld.net2026-03-10

Head-To-Head Review: Farmland Partners (NYSE:FPI) versus Healthcare Realty Trust (NYSE:HR)

Healthcare Realty Trust (NYSE: HR - Get Free Report) and Farmland Partners (NYSE: FPI - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability. Valuation and Earnings This table compares Healthcare

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"FPI reported Q2’26 revenue of $9.40M and net income of $3.11M (EPS $0.071). QoQ, revenue fell from $10.10M (Q1’26) to $9.40M (-7.0%), while net income dropped sharply from $0.64M to $3.11M (+386%). YoY, revenue declined from $9.96M (Q2’25) to $9.40M (-5.6%), but net income rose from $7.60M to $3.11M (-59.1%). Profitability was mixed across the last four quarters: Q2’26 gross margin stayed high at ~90.7% but came off Q1’26 (~85.5%). Operating income improved to $4.33M with an operating margin of ~46.1% versus ~35.4% in Q1’26, though Q2’25 margins were lower-to-mid range (operating margin ~27.0%). Net margin in Q2’26 was ~33.1%. Cash flow weakened materially: operating cash flow was -$3.47M and free cash flow was -$3.20M, driven by working-capital drag (change in working capital -$5.14M). Balance sheet resilience appears moderate: total assets were ~$699.8M with equity of ~$463.1M; leverage is supported by large equity despite net debt of ~$212.9M. Shareholder returns look solid on price momentum (1Y change +17.6%), and the dividend yield is low (~0.32%); buyback activity appears strong (repurchased ~$68.3M in Q2’26). Analysts’ consensus target ($17) suggests upside versus the $11.79 price (~44%)."

Revenue Growth

Caution

QoQ revenue declined -7.0% ($10.10M to $9.40M). YoY revenue decreased -5.6% ($9.96M to $9.40M), indicating a soft top-line trend.

Profitability

Positive

Operating margin expanded QoQ to ~46.1% (from ~35.4%) with gross margin also improving. However, YoY net income fell -59.1%, suggesting earnings power remains volatile.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$3.47M and free cash flow -$3.20M in Q2’26, reflecting significant working-capital deterioration (change in working capital -$5.14M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were ~$699.8M and equity ~$463.1M. Liabilities increased QoQ, and net debt was ~$212.9M, but equity remains substantial for resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

Share price momentum is positive (1Y +17.6%, <20% threshold) and buybacks were notable (common stock repurchased ~$68.3M in Q2’26). Dividend yield is modest (~0.32%).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is $17 vs. $11.79 current price (implied upside ~44%), supporting a constructive valuation backdrop.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

FPI’s Q2 2026 results show weaker GAAP earnings but modest improvement in AFFO per share, reflecting timing differences between disposition gains and core cash-flow drivers. EPS fell versus Q2 2025 primarily due to fewer property dispositions and lower net gains, while AFFO benefited from higher interest income (loan program/financing receivables) and incremental royalty/variable rent dynamics. Management modestly lifted the 2026 AFFO guidance low end to $13.5M ($0.31/share), with the key support coming from improved almond visibility later in the year (yield/pricing), not from a broad-based citrus/avocado rebound. Capital remains liquid with ~$122M undrawn credit capacity. The Q&A centered on credit-loss reserve buildup tied largely to one distressed borrower and buyback constraints from mid-5% borrowing costs versus a ~mid-3% dividend yield, implying disciplined repurchase execution backed by asset sales. The dominant strategic overhang is California—cash-flow helpful in the near term, but disposal markets remain transaction-challenged amid persistent water/labor/policy pressures.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Higher interest income from higher average balances under the FPI loan program/financing receivables
  • Higher variable lease payments as year-to-date visibility improves—especially almonds—supporting AFFO guidance low-end increase
  • Oil and gas royalty proceeds increased during the quarter

Business Development

  • Sold an Illinois farm to a solar developer (solar development value > agricultural value), locking in a gain

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q2: Net income $3.1M ($0.07 EPS) vs $7.8M ($0.15 EPS) in Q2 2025; AFFO $1.7M ($0.04 per share) vs $1.3M ($0.03) in Q2 2025
  • 6M: Net income $3.8M ($0.08 EPS) vs $9.9M ($0.18) in 6M 2025; AFFO $3.8M ($0.09) vs $3.6M ($0.08)
  • AFFO per share up by $0.01 for both 3- and 6-month periods Y/Y, despite lower EPS due to fewer property dispositions and lower net gains
  • Guidance updated: AFFO forecast range $13.5M to $15.3M (=$0.31 to $0.35/share); low end increased vs prior quarter, high end unchanged
  • Operating-expense declines Y/Y were partially offset by an increased credit loss allowance provision
  • Capital structure: average loan rate decreased from 5.64% to 5.25% (approx. 39 bps)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Undrawn revolver/credit lines capacity: ~$122M at end of Q2 2026; repayments of ~$8M in the quarter; no new borrowings
  • One MetLife loan had a rate reset in Q2; one loan extended by 1 year; average rates decreased 5.64% -> 5.25%
  • Buyback: management stated buybacks are driven by stock price and cash availability; willing to borrow occasionally to execute, but would prefer asset sales to backfill and avoid sustained negative spread vs dividend yield

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Evaluating asset dispositions through end of year, especially noncore California assets
  • Holding back on pushing lease renewals for the next year because tenant financial conditions are not ideal; wait for better news before intensifying the renewal cycle
  • Lease process approach: pursue leasing aggressively in early summer; maintain optionality into fall due to commodity/weather uncertainty; target start by September to avoid running out of time
  • California stance: long-term bearish; gradual liquidation of California exposure; reinvest/proceed toward Midwest core

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 AFFO outlook: $13.5M to $15.3M ($0.31 to $0.35/share); low end increased since April guidance
  • Variable rents: increase attributed to improved visibility on almonds yield/pricing as the year progresses; citrus/avocado commentary tied to specific operating/yield and market conditions rather than a structural change

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Credit risk: loan program described as high-risk due to lending to distressed operators with steep terms; reserves are being built as borrowers experience trouble (risk of losing control to bankruptcy/court process)
  • Variable-rent/crop risk: management remains cautious early in the year (citing prior poor almond performance), relying on improving visibility later
  • California headwinds: characterized as the worst conditions in management’s lifetime driven by bad state policy, declining water availability (including political decline), and rising farm labor costs pressuring specialty crops
  • Transaction challenge: California disposition market remains challenged from a transaction perspective, though ‘less challenged’ than six months ago

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Credit loss reserve drivers and borrower specificity: Management explained the increased allowance relates mainly to the same previously discussed borrower, with monitoring continuing. They emphasized risk is not intent-based so far, but the possibility that borrowers lose control via bankruptcy, shifting recovery from known entities to faceless court processes over time.
  • Topic: Variable rent and crop/insurance assumptions: Management clarified that the guidance variable rent increase was driven primarily by almonds, where later-year yield and pricing visibility improves. For citrus/avocado, they cited softer markets and some weather-related yield pressure in California rather than a broad pricing/volume upgrade across all crops.
  • Topic: Buyback rationale vs borrowing costs and disposition backfill: Management stated buybacks are first driven by stock price attractiveness, then by cash availability. They noted borrowing costs are mid-5% versus a dividend yield around mid-3%, creating a spread risk. Even if borrowing for near-term execution, they want asset sales to backfill rather than sustain negative spread.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the FPI Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for FPI.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (FPI)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) Financial Profile