First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) Market Cap

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Peter E. Baccile

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: REIT - Industrial

IPO Date: 1994-06-23

Website: https://www.firstindustrial.com

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is a leading U.S.-only owner, operator, developer and acquirer of logistics properties. Through our fully integrated operating and investing platform, we provide high quality facilities and industry-leading customer service to multinational corporations and regional firms that are essential for their supply chains. In total, we own and have under development approximately 71.6 million square feet of industrial space concentrated in 15 target MSAs as of December 31, 2025. First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. was incorporated in 1993 in Maryland, USA,

Analyst Sentiment

73%
Strong Buy

From 17 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $72.67

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$66

Median

$72

High Bound

$83

Average

$73

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$72.67
▲ +10.37% Upside
Low Target
$66.00
0% Risk
Median Target
$72.00
9% Mid
High Target
$83.00
26% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST INC (FR) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

First Industrial Realty Trust (FR) owns and operates industrial real estate, primarily focused on infill logistics and warehouse/distribution facilities in high-demand job and population centers. The value chain is straightforward: the company acquires or develops income-producing industrial properties, leases space to businesses that require space for warehousing, fulfillment, and light manufacturing, and generates cash flow through contractual rents and tenant reimbursements. Over time, FR’s leasing activity converts demand for “where goods move” into recurring revenue, while property-level operational capabilities and active asset management support occupancy, rent renewal outcomes, and redevelopment value creation.

A key feature of industrial REIT economics is customer stickiness at the site level: tenants often face meaningful friction in relocating distribution networks (site search, build-out timelines, permitting, IT/operations transition, and disruption). This tends to make lease rollover and renewal dynamics less “commoditized” than many other real estate categories.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

FR’s monetisation is dominated by recurring rent under multi-year leases, supplemented by tenant reimbursements (e.g., operating expense pass-throughs and other recoveries) and occasional leasing-related income (e.g., re-leasing fees where applicable). The primary margin drivers are:

  • Stability and growth of Net Operating Income (NOI): achieved through occupancy management, rent renewals, and disciplined expense control.
  • Rent collection quality: the ability to maintain collections through economic cycles and manage lease roll risk.
  • Cost discipline: operating expense structure and reimbursement mechanics that protect margins.
  • Value-add redevelopment/modernization: expanding and repositioning properties to meet evolving tenant requirements (clear heights, dock/door functionality, power needs, and layout efficiency), which can improve future rent potential.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

FR’s competitive position is best understood through a property-location moat and operational execution that reduces tenant churn. For industrial facilities located in constrained “infill” areas, supply scarcity and the logistical advantage of proximity to demand centers can be enduring—even when broader industrial rents fluctuate.

  • Moat — Geographic & logistical advantages (practical scarcity): competitors may build or acquire industrial assets, but matching specific infill locations and nearby labor access is difficult due to land constraints, entitlement timelines, and construction constraints. This creates durable demand for well-located warehouses/distribution facilities.
  • Moat — Switching costs for tenants (operational friction): relocating a distribution network is costly and disruptive. Once an operator invests in local distribution infrastructure and customer routing, lease renewals and staggered expansion plans become more likely.
  • Moat — Active asset management: FR can improve future cash flows through redevelopment, modernization, and lease structuring that align with tenant operational needs.

Competitive benchmarking:

FR competes primarily with other industrial REITs that also target major metro areas, including Prologis (large-scale logistics platforms, more global reach and breadth of development), Rexford Industrial Realty (select metro focus and extensive infill industrial exposure in certain markets), and Terreno Realty (infill industrial emphasis in coastal markets). These rivals compete for the same tenant base—logistics, e-commerce fulfillment, and light industrial operators—but FR’s positioning emphasizes infill access and asset-level execution in its chosen geographies, rather than purely scale or purely speculative development.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, FR’s growth framework is tied to structural industrial demand and the ability to monetize constrained space. Key drivers include:

  • Supply chain reconfiguration: reshoring, nearshoring, and regional inventory strategies increase the need for well-located distribution nodes closer to customers.
  • Infill logistics demand: growth in last-mile distribution and faster fulfillment expectations supports demand for industrial assets near employment and consumption.
  • Tenant technology and automation upgrades: industrial tenants increasingly seek buildings that support modern warehouse operations, which can lift leasing spreads when assets are upgraded.
  • Redevelopment and repositioning pipeline: capital investment in existing properties can enhance long-term value through functional obsolescence mitigation (layout, power, dock configuration, and building specifications).
  • Operating leverage through occupancy management: as demand normalizes, NOI can expand through higher rent, improved absorption, and favorable expense coverage dynamics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capital markets and interest rate sensitivity: REIT valuations and development economics can be pressured by higher borrowing costs and reduced availability of capital.
  • Industrial supply cycles: new construction and speculative deliveries can create periods of elevated vacancy or rent pressure, especially in specific metro submarkets.
  • Tenant credit and lease rollover risk: concentration in particular industries or tenants can amplify downside during downturns; leasing execution and renewal timing matter.
  • Regulatory and permitting constraints: zoning, environmental rules, and building code requirements can delay development/redevelopment and increase costs.
  • Environmental liabilities: like other real estate owners, FR must manage environmental assessment and remediation exposure over the property life cycle.
  • Construction and labor cost inflation: redevelopment returns can compress if capital costs rise faster than achievable rent.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market generally values industrial REITs through cash-flow quality and interest-rate-sensitive real estate yield frameworks rather than growth-style multiples alone. Key valuation drivers typically include:

  • NOI/FFO durability: occupancy stability, rent growth assumptions, and expense control.
  • Implied cap rates and discount rates: real estate cap rate expectations shift with the interest rate environment and risk sentiment.
  • Balance sheet structure: maturity ladder, leverage capacity, and access to capital influence resilience across cycles.
  • Development/redevelopment economics: value creation depends on achieving yields above cost and managing execution risk.
  • Market supply/demand outlook by submarket: infill locations can command premium durability, but submarket fundamentals still drive underwriting.

In practice, valuation outcomes tend to track (1) perceived cash flow quality, (2) the sustainability of rent levels in the firm’s targeted infill geographies, and (3) underwriting discipline on redevelopment and leasing.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

FR’s long-term case rests on a defensible infill industrial positioning and property-level tenant stickiness, reinforced by active asset management and the ability to reposition aging assets for modern logistics needs. The principal investment question is not whether industrial leasing will face cycles, but whether FR can sustain cash-flow quality and monetize constrained locations through disciplined execution—while managing interest-rate and supply-cycle risks that affect all industrial REITs.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"FR reported Q2’26 revenue of $194.9M, essentially flat sequentially (+0.1% QoQ vs. $194.8M in Q1’26) and up modestly YoY (+8.4% vs. $179.8M in Q2’25). Net income swung sharply to a small net loss of $(2.6)M in Q2’26, down from $143.1M in Q1’26 (QoQ deterioration) and down from $55.1M in Q2’25 (YoY decline). As a result, the net margin contracted materially from very strong levels in prior quarters (Q1’26 net margin ~73.5%, Q2’25 ~30.7%) to -1.3% in Q2’26. While operating income remained positive at $103.1M, the bottom line appears pressured by unusually large non-operating/expense line items (including a very large depreciation/other expense presentation) leading to negative net income. Cash generation remained solid on a quarter basis: operating cash flow was $114.0M and free cash flow was $114.0M, even as dividends continued ($60.4M paid). Across balance sheet trends, total assets were stable at ~$5.78B, with equity firming to ~$2.78B and net debt remaining high (~$2.54B), though leverage changes were not the primary driver of the quarter’s earnings volatility. For shareholder returns, FR shows strong momentum with a +36.1% 1-year price change and a low dividend yield (~0.74%), implying total return is likely dominated by capital appreciation. Analyst sentiment appears neutral-to-cautious given the consensus target (~$69.7) below the $63.75 current price."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue was flat QoQ (+0.1% to $194.9M) and up YoY (+8.4% vs. $179.8M), indicating mild growth with no clear acceleration.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income fell to a $(2.6)M loss in Q2’26 from $143.1M in Q1’26 and $55.1M in Q2’25. Net margin contracted from ~73.5% (Q1’26) and ~30.7% (Q2’25) to -1.3% in Q2’26.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Operating cash flow was $114.0M in Q2’26 with free cash flow of $114.0M. Dividends were paid ($60.4M), and cash coverage remains supported by cash earnings despite net income volatility.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets were steady (~$5.78B). Equity increased to ~$2.78B, but leverage remains high with net debt around ~$2.54B; resilience looks stable but not de-levering.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

1-year price change is strong at +36.1% (momentum tailwind). Dividend yield is modest (~0.74%), so total return likely relies primarily on price appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus price target (~$69.67) is below/near the current $63.75, offering limited upside versus momentum. Valuation multiples appear elevated and earnings are currently distorted by Q2 net loss.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

FR’s Q2 2026 call highlights improving industrial leasing velocity, especially in larger formats. Management cited stronger touring and faster tenant decision-making tied to reduced availability, reflected in a Central Pennsylvania 708k sf full-building lease and broader development leasing: 433k sf additional signings to 643k sf total. NAREIT FFO rose to $0.82/share, while cash same-store NOI grew 6.7% excluding termination fees, driven primarily by higher cash rental rates (with lower average occupancy and move-outs offsetting some gains). Guidance strengthened: 2026 NAREIT FFO midpoint increased $0.02 to a narrowed $3.08–$3.16 range (ex-proxy advisory costs: $3.12–$3.20). Occupancy guidance remains well-defined despite a projected 3Q dip (~93.5%), expected to rebound to ~95.5% by year-end on development lease-up assumptions. Key watch items are development execution timing, ongoing land/entitlement constraints, and data center developers’ competition for industrial land—though demand remains broad-based and incremental rather than dominant.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Full-building leasing win at 708k sf in Central Pennsylvania (TA lease) driving stronger momentum and guidance lift
  • Development leasing acceleration: additional 433k sf signings, total 643k sf in the quarter; full lease-up of 226k sf First Park New Castle and expansion start for a 613k sf second building
  • Improved larger-format leasing activity: leasing activity for 700k–1.2M sf up 127% YoY and >1M sf up 117% YoY, indicating scarcity value and faster tenant decision cycles
  • Tenant credit step-up: Debenhams (formerly Boohoo) signs 1.1M sf full-building sublease in Pennsylvania via a 3PL subtenant already a valued FR tenant

Business Development

  • Debenhams (formerly Boohoo) sublease: 1.1M sf full-building sublease in Pennsylvania to a 3PL subtenant
  • First Pompano Logistics Center (South Florida): tenant expanded into remaining 31k sf
  • First Park 121 (Dallas): full-building 176k sf lease signed to a wire and cable supplier supporting the data center industry
  • First Park New Castle (Philadelphia market): 226k sf fully leased; start announced for second 613k sf facility (up to 4 tenants) at ~north of 8% estimated cash yield
  • Dallas acquisition (Great Southwest/Arlington submarket): 161k sf facility 50% leased purchased for $26M targeting ~6% cash yield
  • Baltimore acquisition (B-W Corridor): 58-acre infill site for $39M designed for 3 buildings totaling 629k sf after entitlement/infrastructure
  • Land sale: $131M Phoenix land sale priced at $30/sf (~just under 3x industrial land values)
  • Detroit sales: 4 buildings totaling 310k sf sold for $29M (116k sf remaining)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • NAREIT FFO: $0.82 per fully diluted share vs $0.76 prior year; Q2 commentary tied to higher rental rates on new/renewal contractual bumps and lower free rent partially offset by lower average occupancy
  • Cash same store NOI growth excluding termination fees: 6.7% for the quarter
  • Same store NOI drivers: average occupancy up slightly and cash rental rates up; move-outs in multiple markets offset the Central PA pickup
  • Guidance: increased 2026 NAREIT FFO midpoint by $0.02/share; narrowed range to $3.08–$3.16 per share
  • Advisory costs disclosure: guidance includes $0.04/share advisory costs from contested proxy campaign (Q1); excluding these, 2026 FFO range is $3.12–$3.20
  • Occupancy guide cadence: average quarter-end in-service occupancy 94%–95%; projected dip to ~93.5% at end of 3Q and recover to ~95.5% by year-end
  • Occupancy bps: in-service occupancy ended at 94.9%, up 60 bps from Q1 (primarily 708k sf TA lease)
  • CBRE national vacancy: improved 20 bps to 6.5% at end of Q2; also cited net absorption 85M sf nearly doubling Q1 vs 48M sf deliveries
  • Same store NOI growth guide: 5.25%–6.25% increase excluding termination fees; +25 bps at midpoint
  • Cash rental rate: for 2026 commencements guided at 35%–40% (midpoint tightening); signed leases cash rental rate increase for new/renewals is 39%
  • 2026 funding/cap assumptions: expected to capitalize ~$0.08/share of interest; G&A guidance $42M–$43M excluding $5.6M proxy campaign costs

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Development funding plan (back half): ~$75M of development process/capex requirement for last 6 months; about half covered by excess cash flow after CapEx/dividends; remaining can use line of credit
  • Line of credit: low balance noted
  • No explicit buyback or net debt/cash runway figures were provided in the transcript excerpt

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Development leasing timing adjustments: 900k sf remaining development leasing opportunity set assumed to occur primarily in Q4; guidance made changes to assumptions, not the underlying 1.7M sf opportunity set
  • Occupancy guide maintenance despite moving parts: adjustments to development leasing moved entirely into Q4; if certain leases do not sign, FFO impact reduced to ~0.01/share
  • Spec cap allocation framing: development cap is a $410M cap (not a target); deployments governed by profitability and delivering into the deepest unmet demand in each market; avoid too many projects in one park simultaneously
  • Land sourcing approach: focus on infill, supply-constrained markets; preference for off-market deals and early-stage opportunities via brokerage relationships and tenant relationships to enable preleases
  • Data center competition noted on land: data center developers/hyperscalers actively acquire industrial land and pay materially higher prices, potentially crowding out traditional industrial land deals

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 leasing/occupancy: expect average quarter-end in-service occupancy 94%–95%; dip to ~93.5% at end of 3Q; end year ~95.5% based on development leasing plus core leasing
  • 2026 NAREIT FFO guide: $3.08–$3.16 per share (midpoint +$0.02); exclusion of proxy advisory costs yields $3.12–$3.20
  • 2026 cash rental rate guidance: 35%–40% (tightened range, midpoint increase); signed lease cash rental rate increase for new/renewals is 39%
  • 2026 expirations/renewals granularity: 80% of 2026 expirations taken care of by square footage; budgeted renewals in guidance show none over 100k sf

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • In-quarter occupancy softness: cash/same store occupancy guidance held steady but same store occupancy declined QoQ due to move-outs (3–4 in the ~100k sf range) offsetting the 708k sf pickup
  • Development leasing execution risk: occupancy guidance depends on leasing the incremental development leasing opportunity, assumed primarily in Q4; if leases do not sign, FFO impact reduced to ~0.01/share (implies sensitivity to lease-up timing)
  • Southern California and competitive set/decision cadence: recovery requires tenant decision-making; rents described as flat in SoCal despite improved absorption vs deliveries
  • Land entitlement and land acquisition frictions: entitlements described as “not getting any easier,” land remains difficult to come by; data center developers increase land price competition
  • Data center conversion cycle limitation: power commitment requirements mean nothing “will happen” for sure within the year; conversion timelines are long-term

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Occupancy guide mechanics: Management explained the in-service occupancy dip and rebound path. They clarified ~45 bps of the dip is tied to a Nashville development coming into service in 3Q that is projected to lease in 4Q, and positioned the 95.5% year-end target as dependent on development lease-up decisions rather than fundamental demand loss.
  • Renewal/expiration and leasing concentration: Analysts asked how much of 2026’s renewal schedule is already de-risked and what could move the high end of guidance. Management stated 80% of 2026 rollovers were already handled by square footage, and that budgeted renewals in guidance are granular with none over 100k sf.
  • Land supply and data center competitive pressure: Management detailed how data center developers increase land acquisition competition by buying industrial land and paying materially higher prices than traditional industrial values. They cited Phoenix land sale pricing just under 3x industrial land values and emphasized land entitlements remain difficult, limiting supply easing.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the FR Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) Financial Profile