FirstSun Capital Bancorp

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Market Cap

FirstSun Capital Bancorp has a market capitalization of $1.08B.

Price: $38.68

-0.31 (-0.80%)

Market Cap: 1.08B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Neal E. Arnold

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 2022-08-03

Website: https://ir.firstsuncb.com

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.08B|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

FirstSun Capital Bancorp functions as the parent entity for Sunflower Bank, offering a comprehensive suite of commercial and retail banking as well as financial solutions primarily to small and mid-sized businesses. Its deposit offerings include non-interest and interest-bearing demand accounts, standard checking and savings accounts, money market options, and certificates of deposit. The bank provides a variety of lending products, such as commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate mortgages (both owner and non-owner occupied), 1-4 family and multi-family housing loans, and home equity lines. Consumer credit solutions feature direct installment loans, credit card facilities, overdraft protection, and other revolving credit products. Beyond core banking, FirstSun Capital Bancorp also delivers remote deposit, cash management, and treasury management services, along with extensive wealth management and trust products encompassing personal, employee benefit, investment advisory, and foundation/endowment accounts. The company serves its clientele through branch locations situated in Kansas, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona. Founded in 1892 and headquartered in Denver, Colorado, the firm was formerly known as Sunflower Financial, Inc. before rebranding as FirstSun Capital Bancorp in June 2017.

Analyst Sentiment

93%
Strong Buy

From 5 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $44.67

▲ +15.5% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$44

Median

$45

High Bound

$45

Average

$45

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$44.67
▲ +15.49% Upside
Low Target
$44.00
14% Risk
Median Target
$45.00
16% Mid
High Target
$45.00
16% Max
Consensus
Buy
4 / 4 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 30, 2026Mar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)1,0761,8101,0151,0481,0779641,0021,0991,169
Enterprise Value ($M)3091,043721432503267465598682
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)19.34-19.7911.8410.5711.689.1410.6316.6913.15
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-1.524.851.023.635.65
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.8311.617.367.187.306.707.588.568.29
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.980.990.860.910.960.880.941.061.13
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)16.43-71.9155.1722.6274.0941.17406.7924.83
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)6.695.232.963.411.853.524.654.83
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)4.49-37.3024.8611.7116.277.4914.3826.2821.94
Debt to Equity Ratio-11.140.120.100.030.080.080.080.110.08

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP (FSUN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

FirstSun Capital Bancorp operates as a community-focused depository institution, earning value by mobilizing customer deposits into interest-earning assets (primarily loans and investment securities) and by providing transaction and lending services that deepen customer relationships. The economic “engine” is the spread between the yield on earning assets and the cost of funding, supplemented by fee income from credit and banking services.

Stickiness emerges through relationship banking: once deposit accounts and lending lines are established, customers face practical switching costs (transfer logistics, underwriting re-qualification, and operational disruption). Additionally, local/regional banking knowledge can improve credit selection and service responsiveness.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation model is dominated by net interest income, driven by:

  • Loan portfolio yield (credit quality, pricing discipline, mix of consumer/commercial credit).
  • Cost of deposits (deposit pricing strategy, mix of non-interest-bearing vs. interest-bearing balances).
  • Balance-sheet positioning (liquidity posture, duration/interest rate sensitivity, and the mix of earning assets).

Non-interest income typically provides a secondary earnings stream through:

  • Deposit and transaction-related fees (account services, cash management).
  • Lending and loan-adjacent fees (origination, servicing-related income, and other credit-related fees).
  • Ancillary banking services (where offered), which can help offset variability in net interest income.

Margin stability depends less on “headline growth” and more on deposit franchise quality, underwriting discipline, and expense control.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat thesis (financials moat): FSUN’s durability is best understood as a combination of deposit cost advantage, regulatory/capital constraints, and credit culture, reinforced by practical relationship switching costs.

  • Cost of deposits (deposit franchise quality): Community/regional banks that maintain competitive pricing, benefit from relationship depth, and retain lower-cost funding can support net interest income through varying rate environments.
  • Regulatory moat (capital + compliance intensity): Banking requires sustained capital, risk management infrastructure, and regulatory oversight—raising barriers for new entrants and limiting aggressive imitation of underwriting and funding strategies.
  • Credit culture (underwriting discipline): Loan loss performance and underwriting consistency can protect tangible book value over cycles, which matters for long-duration compounding in banking.

Competitive benchmarking: FSUN competes for deposits and business lending against larger regional and multi-market banks such as:

  • Regions Financial (RF) — broader footprint and product breadth, competing heavily on deposit gathering and commercial relationships.
  • Synovus (SNV) — similar regional banking model with emphasis on relationship-based services.
  • Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) — larger platform, competing on scale and fee-generating capabilities in business banking.

Positioning contrast: While these peers may enjoy economies of scale and wider product ecosystems, FSUN’s competitive focus is typically anchored in maintaining relationship density and underwriting selectivity within its operating geography—supporting a cost-and-credit framework that is harder to replicate without established local presence and internal credit infrastructure.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is likely to be driven by a blend of balance-sheet expansion and productivity, rather than purely by rate movements:

  • Organic deposit growth tied to local economic activity: Banking balance sheets expand as households and businesses grow, and as deposit retention improves through service quality.
  • Credit demand from commercial and consumer segments: Lending opportunities can expand with population growth, small business formation, and replacement/renovation cycles in real assets.
  • Mix optimization: Improving loan mix (while protecting underwriting standards) and enhancing earning-asset yield through prudent pricing can support earnings power.
  • Cross-sell and deeper wallet share: Relationship banking supports gradual increases in fee income through treasury, deposit services, and credit-linked offerings.
  • Operating leverage: In banking, expense discipline and scalable processes can convert balance-sheet growth into incremental profitability when credit costs remain controlled.

The TAM for banking services is large and persistent; the key question is the ability to capture share without impairing credit performance or deposit franchise economics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Interest rate risk and funding dynamics: Changes in deposit betas and balance-sheet repricing can compress net interest income if funding costs rise faster than earning asset yields.
  • Credit cycle risk: Loan losses can rise in downturns; monitoring underwriting quality, early warning indicators, and concentration exposures is critical.
  • Commercial real estate and concentration risk: Geographic or sector-specific credit concentrations can increase volatility during periods of stress.
  • Liquidity and funding risk: Reliance on more rate-sensitive funding sources can elevate volatility and constrain strategic flexibility.
  • Regulatory and capital requirements: Capital adequacy, stress testing outcomes, and compliance costs can affect growth and return on equity.
  • Technology and cybersecurity: Fintech-driven competition and elevated cyber threats can pressure costs and create operational risk.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market for banks typically values earnings power through metrics such as price-to-tangible book value (P/TBV), efficiency ratio, and return on tangible equity, rather than purely through revenue growth multiples.

Key valuation drivers include:

  • Credit quality trajectory: Durable or improving asset quality supports tangible book value preservation.
  • Deposit franchise economics: A lower cost of deposits and resilient deposit retention can sustain net interest margins and earnings stability.
  • Expense discipline and operating leverage: Efficiency improvements can expand profitability without proportionate balance-sheet risk.
  • Capital strength: Adequate capital provides capacity for growth and loss absorption, supporting market confidence in long-term compounding.

In this sector, valuation tends to move when investors gain confidence in the intersection of (1) stable funding economics, (2) controlled credit costs, and (3) sustainable capital generation.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

FirstSun Capital Bancorp’s investment case centers on a relationship-driven deposit franchise, underwriting discipline, and a regulatory/capital framework that raises barriers to imitation. The most durable upside typically comes from maintaining deposit cost advantages while expanding loans and service revenue without allowing credit quality or expense discipline to deteriorate. For long-term investors, FSUN’s core question is whether it can sustain superior funding economics and credit outcomes through cycles, thereby protecting and compounding tangible book value.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for FSUN.

prnewswire.com2026-07-30

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp - FSUN

NEW YORK, July 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp ("FirstSun" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FSUN).  Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-28

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

globenewswire.com2026-07-28

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp - FSUN

NEW YORK, July 28, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FSUN).  Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext.

marketbeat.com2026-07-28

FirstSun Capital Bancorp Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

FirstSun Capital Bancorp NASDAQ: FSUN reported a second-quarter net loss of $23 million, or $0.49 per diluted share, as merger-related expenses and elevated credit provisions weighed on results following its April 1 acquisition of First Foundation.

zacks.com2026-07-27

FirstSun Capital (FSUN) Reports Q2 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

While the top- and bottom-line numbers for FirstSun Capital (FSUN) give a sense of how the business performed in the quarter ended June 2026, it could be worth looking at how some of its key metrics compare to Wall Street estimates and year-ago values.

businesswire.com2026-07-27

FirstSun Capital Bancorp Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results and Board of Directors Authorizes $150 Million Share Repurchase Program

DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun”) (NASDAQ: FSUN) reported net loss of $(22.9) million for the second quarter of 2026 compared to net income of $26.4 million for the second quarter of 2025. Earnings per diluted share were $(0.49) for the second quarter of 2026 compared to $0.93 for the second quarter of 2025. Adjusted net income, a non-GAAP financial measure, was $21.0 million or $0.45 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2026 compared to $26.6 million or $0.9.

prnewswire.com2026-07-23

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp - FSUN

NEW YORK, July 23, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp ("FirstSun" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FSUN).  Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext.

globenewswire.com2026-07-21

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp - FSUN

NEW YORK, July 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FSUN).  Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.

gurufocus.com2026-07-17

FSUN Investors Have Opportunity to Join FirstSun Capital Bancorp Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm

[url="]The Schall Law Firm[/url], a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Ca

businesswire.com2026-07-17

FSUN Investors Have Opportunity to Join FirstSun Capital Bancorp Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $FSUN--FSUN Investors Have Opportunity to Join FirstSun Capital Bancorp Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm.

prnewswire.com2026-07-16

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp - FSUN

NEW YORK, July 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of FirstSun Capital Bancorp ("FirstSun" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FSUN).  Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext.

globenewswire.com2026-07-16

FSUN INVESTOR ALERT: Holzer & Holzer, LLC Announces Investigation of FirstSun Capital Bancorp

ATLANTA, July 16, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Holzer & Holzer, LLC is investigating whether FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FSUN) complied with federal securities laws. On July 9, 2026, FirstSun announced that it “expects its second quarter 2026 financial results to be adversely affected by charge-offs, primarily related to two commercial lending relationships, and related increases in our provision for credit losses.” The Company further stated that, “we expect our provision for credit losses to be in the range of between $40 million and $41 million and charge-offs to be in the range of between $42 million and $43 million.”  The price of the Company's stock dropped following this news.

businesswire.com2026-07-15

Securities Fraud Investigation Into FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Announced – Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, today announced that it has commenced an investigation on behalf of FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FSUN) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of the federal securities laws.IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP (FSUN), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS.What Hap.

gurufocus.com2026-07-15

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Shareholders Who Lost Money -- Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: [url="]FSUN[/url

businesswire.com2026-07-15

FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Shareholders Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of FirstSun Capital Bancorp (“FirstSun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FSUN) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP (FSUN), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"FSUN reported Q1’26 revenue of $137.9M and net income of $21.6M (EPS $0.77). QoQ, revenue decreased from $146.0M (Q4’25) to $137.9M (down 5.5%), while net income fell from $24.8M to $21.6M (down 13.0%). YoY, revenue rose from $132.2M (Q1’25) to $137.9M (up 4.3%), and net income declined from $23.6M (Q1’25) to $21.6M (down 8.4%). Profitability softened sequentially: gross margin slipped to ~69.8% from ~71.2% in Q4’25, and net margin contracted to ~15.6% from ~17.0%. On a trailing 4-quarter view, net margin has generally moderated from the higher ~18% levels seen in mid-2025, suggesting cost pressure (notably higher G&A in Q1’26). Balance sheet resilience remains strong with substantial liquidity (cash ~$414M) and low leverage (net debt ~-$294M; equity ~$1.18B). Cash flow quality weakened in Q1’26: operating cash flow was -$12.4M and free cash flow was -$14.1M, versus +$20.8M operating cash flow in Q4’25. Shareholder returns look positive given a 1-year price change of +16.0% (no explicit buyback/dividend activity in the provided quarter), but momentum is below the >20% threshold."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue -5.5% (146.0M to 137.9M), but YoY revenue +4.3% (132.2M to 137.9M), indicating modest growth despite a softer sequential quarter.

Profitability

Fair

Net income QoQ -13.0% and YoY -8.4%. Net margin contracted to 15.6% from 16.99% QoQ, with gross margin also slipping (71.2% to 69.8%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$12.4M and free cash flow -$14.1M, a reversal from Q4’25 (+$20.8M operating cash flow; +$19.0M FCF). Dividend/repurchase cash outflows were not evident in the quarter data.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Strong liquidity and leverage profile: cash ~$414M; total assets ~$8.57B; equity ~$1.18B. Net debt is negative (net debt -$294M), implying net cash rather than leverage risk.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Price momentum is solid but not extreme: 1y_change +16.0% with no dividend yield shown and no buyback activity indicated for the quarter. Total shareholder return support appears moderate.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Current price $39.12 vs consensus target $44 implies limited upside (~+12.5%). Valuation multiples are not favorable in the provided ratios (e.g., P/E ~11.8), and earnings momentum has softened.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

FSUN’s Q2 2026 results were decisively integration-driven and credit-constrained: the company posted a $23M net loss with heavy after-tax merger costs ($44M) and after-tax credit provisioning ($30M). Underlying per-share economics improved via adjusted PPNR of $70M ($1.50/share), but NIM declined to 3.58% as acquired assets and repositioning timing weighed on margin. The most actionable positives were operational and funding: balance sheet repositioning finished in Q2 (acquired assets reduced ~$3.9B) and deposit cost fell meaningfully (20 bps lower June vs April; implied 35 bps lower vs Q1), supporting a guided margin recovery. Management expects NIM to rise to mid-380s in Q4 and high-380s in Q1’27, with cost saves running ahead (~65% of $68M target annualized). Risks are concentrated credit events and rising criticized/NPL metrics tied largely to the acquired First Foundation book, though the portfolio is said to be well reserved and borrower-driven.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Post-acquisition integration enabling franchise expansion in Southern California and Southwest Florida markets
  • Deposit growth in Los Angeles and Orange County driving ~5% adjusted annualized growth (excluding acquired First Foundation deposits net of downsizing)
  • Service-fee diversification: service fee revenue represented 22% of total revenues in Q2; mortgage and treasury/wealth mix scaling post-deal

Business Development

  • Acquisition of First Foundation completed April 1, 2026
  • Ongoing integration including core system conversion scheduled late September (implies operational “conversion” execution for the acquired platform)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Reported net loss of $23 million, or $0.49 per diluted share; included $44 million after-tax merger-related expenses and $30 million after-tax credit loss provisioning
  • Adjusted PPNR (excluding merger expenses) was $70 million, or $1.50 per share vs $37.3 million, or $1.32 per share in Q1
  • Net interest margin (NIM) was 3.58% (down from 4.25% in Q1) driven by acquired loan portfolio mix and repositioning timing
  • Deposit cost improvement: June deposit costs were 20 bps lower vs April; cost of deposits would have been 35 bps lower comparing June vs Q1 assuming First Foundation in company at that time
  • NIM improvement from April to June by 29 bps; June NIM finished at 3.76%
  • Charge-offs: $42.4 million, or 145 bps annualized; provisioning expense $40.4 million
  • Credit events concentration: two larger loan charge-offs totaled ~$35 million pre-tax and represented 86% of Q2 provision and 82% of total Q2 charge-offs; materials distribution fraud misrepresentation alone drove ~75 bps of the total 145 bps annualized charge-off ratio
  • Tangible book value dilution from acquisition ~10% (less than original estimate ~14% at announcement)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase program announced for up to $150 million, with repurchases targeted over next four quarters starting in Q3 (starting in August mentioned by CFO)
  • Capital ratios: CET1 11.95%, total risk-based capital 14.13%, tier 1 leverage 9.47%
  • Maintains a targeted minimum operating level for CET1 at 11%

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Balance sheet repositioning completed in Q2: reduced acquired assets by ~$3.9 billion including $1.4 billion acquired securities and $1.3 billion acquired loans
  • Loan downsizing sales occurred in June; loans sold had weighted average stated coupon of 3.94% (and no purchase accounting fair value marks because held for sale)
  • Funding repositioning: reduced acquired funding ~$3.9 billion including $2.2 billion broker deposits, ~$330 million higher-cost non-relationship deposits, $1.4 billion non-relationship deposits, and FHLB borrowings; wholesale funding ratio at 6.8% at quarter end
  • Deposit mix shift: non-interest bearing deposits were 18.1% of total (down from 23.1%); money market balances 40.4% of total (up from 38%)
  • Core efficiency/cost saves: annualized run-rate realized in Q2 ~65% of original $68 million total cost-savings target; ahead of schedule on phasing
  • Integration roadmap: remaining work includes core system conversion scheduled for Q2 in the late September timeframe

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2026: loans low single-digit growth from Q2 period-end through year-end; mid-single-digit growth in 2027
  • Deposits: low single-digit growth through year-end (excluding acquisition/remix effects), mid-single-digit growth in 2027
  • Brokered maturities: ~$300 million in 2H26 at weighted rate 4.77%; ~$340 million in 2027 at weighted rate 4.83%
  • NIM guidance: margin increasing slightly in Q3 vs June; further increase into mid-380s in Q4; high 380s expected in Q1 2027
  • Non-interest income as % of revenue: low 20s for FY26 and Q4
  • Adjusted efficiency ratio (excluding merger expenses): mid-to-low 60s in 2H26; Q4 expected low 60s; additional savings in Q4 after late-September core system conversion enabling 1Q27 efficiency ratio in ~high 50s to low 60s
  • Credit: full-year net charge-offs to average loans high 50s (annualized mid-teens in 2H26 to reach high 50s full-year); ACL/loans mid-140s to 150 bps for full year
  • Charge-offs normalization expected: 2027 in line with projected Q4 2026 level

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Elevated credit losses driven by borrower-specific events; criticized loans increased (7.7% of total loans vs 4.3% at end of Q1) largely due to acquired First Foundation portfolio (~76% of increase)
  • Non-performing loans increased to 1.64% of total loans (from 0.86%); concentrated NAICS categories represent 96% of NPL increase
  • NIM pressure from acquired loan portfolio mix and higher funding costs during integration/repositioning
  • Integration execution risk until core system conversion in late September
  • Forecast uncertainty emphasized by management: lumpy credit outcomes and “hard to forecast when an operator tips over”

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Q3/average earning-asset outlook and whether downsizing timing changes the run-rate; Management’s detailed response: Rob said they guide to “low single-digit growth” on both a period-end basis and an average basis when comparing Q3 average to Q2 month-end through year-end. The guidance range is consistent across those measurement approaches, implying no incremental step-down from June downsizing effects.
  • Topic: Back-half margin improvement drivers—broker deposits vs core remix; Management’s detailed response: Rob attributed margin pickup to cost of funds, emphasizing broker rates around the 480 level and expected reductions, plus deposit remix between normal core deposits and brokers. He referenced wholesale funding ratio at 6.8% and suggested it may decline slightly via remix, which should be margin favorable, especially into Q4 and beyond.
  • Topic: Credit underwriting comfort given sequential category increases and recent larger charge-offs; Management’s detailed response: Neil said they accept credit “lumpiness” because they are more C&I-focused than peers, but stated no loans are near legal lending limits and concentration is managed. He noted quarterly deep dives, no change in underwriting approach, and borrower-driven events rather than process failure, with comparisons across categories (e.g., data-center/other concern areas) repeatedly showing no structural misstep.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the FSUN Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for FSUN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (FSUN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) Financial Profile