Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) Market Cap

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. has a market capitalization of $746.9M.

Price: $13.77

-0.35 (-2.48%)

Market Cap: 746.91M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Victor J. Coleman

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: REIT - Office

IPO Date: 2010-06-24

Website: https://www.hudsonpacificproperties.com

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) - Company Information

Market Cap: 746.91M|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) functions as a Real Estate Investment Trust, overseeing a significant collection of office and studio properties. Its extensive holdings encompass nearly 19 million square feet, a figure that also accounts for land designated for future development. The company strategically focuses its investments on key West Coast centers recognized for their innovation, media, and technology industries. Its impressive tenant roster comprises prominent Fortune 500 companies and swiftly expanding enterprises, including well-known names like Netflix, Google, Square, Uber, and NFL Enterprises. Hudson Pacific's stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker HPP, and it is also recognized as a component of the S&P MidCap 400 Index.

Analyst Sentiment

39%
Underperform

From 13 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $12.33

▼ -10.5% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$8

Median

$12

High Bound

$17

Average

$12

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$12.33
▼ -10.46% Upside
Low Target
$8.00
-42% Risk
Median Target
$12.00
-13% Mid
High Target
$17.00
23% Max
Consensus
Hold
7 / 23 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)7473814841,245555417428675664
Enterprise Value ($M)4,3413,9754,1075,0264,4344,9454,9885,1575,144
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-1.36-1.80-0.63-2.30-1.67-1.39-0.64-1.73-3.56
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.02-0.14-1.92
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.922.091.896.672.922.102.043.373.04
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.300.130.160.380.160.150.150.220.21
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)6.589.449.1144.69-70.6716.17-93.2912.1021.88
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)21.8616.0426.9323.3424.9123.7925.7323.60
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-128.6858.31-27.52-609.1979.7895.00-120.79192.0861.31
Debt to Equity Ratio-106.531.291.271.221.221.661.621.511.46

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HUDSON PACIFIC PROPERTIES REIT INC (HPP) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Hudson Pacific Properties REIT Inc (HPP) owns and manages income-producing office properties concentrated in major West Coast markets tied to media, entertainment, and creative-adjacent business activity. The value chain is straightforward: lease space to tenants on negotiated terms, collect base rent plus tenant reimbursements, and enhance long-duration earnings power through leasing, renewals, and selective redevelopment/renovation.

The economic engine is tenant stickiness within specific submarkets. HPP’s properties typically serve as “workspaces” where operational continuity, proximity to local ecosystems, and property-level buildouts increase the cost and friction of relocation.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

HPP’s revenue is primarily rental income generated through a mix of:

  • Base rent under operating leases
  • Tenant reimbursements (e.g., common area costs and other recoverable operating expenses), which help stabilize cash flow relative to pure gross-leased models
  • Lease-related fees and other ancillary items that are smaller but supportive to net operating performance

Monetisation is driven by (1) occupancy and weighted-average lease terms, (2) leasing spreads on renewals and new signings, and (3) controlling operating expense growth through property management and recoverability. Over time, margin durability depends on the ability to sustain rent levels while keeping capital intensity aligned with tenant demand.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

HPP’s moat is best described as a combination of geographic concentration, tenant-specific switching costs, and operational know-how in a niche office demand segment.

  • Geographic scarcity & submarket focus (hard-to-replicate locations): HPP’s concentration in West Coast markets where creative and media-adjacent businesses cluster supports tenant retention. Competing owners generally face different land, zoning, and build-cost realities, which makes “copycat” positioning difficult.
  • Switching costs (space fit + workflow + relationships): Office tenants often require particular layouts, amenity configurations, and operational infrastructure. Renovations, buildouts, and an established landlord–tenant relationship can raise the practical cost of moving—particularly when lease timelines and business continuity matter.
  • Network-like clustering within creative ecosystems: Proximity to complementary talent pools, vendors, and labor markets can support tenant decisions to stay within the same regional micro-ecosystem. This dynamic can reduce churn compared with more generic office submarkets.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Kilroy Realty (KRC) — also focused on high-barrier West Coast business environments, with emphasis on long-term demand drivers. HPP’s positioning leans more heavily toward media/creative-adjacent office demand characteristics.
  • Boston Properties (BXP) — concentrates on major U.S. office markets with a corporate real-estate profile. HPP’s niche West Coast cluster focus differs from a broader “CBD office” strategy.
  • Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) — strong in select New York/urban office corridors. HPP’s competitive set is differentiated by regional submarket dynamics and the tenant composition tied to West Coast creative ecosystems.

Across these rivals, the key distinction is that HPP’s strategy is less about generic CBD office exposure and more about owning properties that benefit from West Coast creative/entertainment demand characteristics and the stickiness that comes with tenant fit.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Selective redevelopment to maintain “institutional-grade” functionality: Older office stock faces steady physical obsolescence risk. A targeted renovation approach can extend economic life, improve leasing velocity, and support renewal rent levels.
  • Supply constraints in key West Coast markets: High land costs, permitting complexity, and construction economics often limit new supply relative to demand for well-located, high-quality space—supporting rent durability and occupancy stability for best-in-class assets.
  • Lease rollover management: Building a pipeline of renewals, re-leases, and tenant upgrades can reduce earnings volatility by smoothing lease maturities and enhancing renewal probability.
  • Tenant demand tied to localized ecosystems: Media/entertainment and creative-adjacent tenants are influenced by where talent and production activity concentrate. Maintaining exposure to these clusters can support longer-term occupancy outcomes.
  • Capital recycling and balance sheet discipline: When market conditions permit, optimizing the portfolio mix (redevelopment of value-accretive assets, divestiture of non-core properties) can improve per-share earnings power.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Office demand elasticity and work-pattern shifts: If tenant space needs decline structurally, leasing spreads and occupancy durability can compress across the sector.
  • Concentration risk in tenant industries and credits: The creative/media-adjacent tenant base can be cyclical and may face funding-driven churn during downturns.
  • Capital intensity and redevelopment execution: Renovations and repositioning require sustained capital allocation. Cost overruns or slower leasing can reduce value creation.
  • Financing and interest-rate sensitivity: REIT earnings and AFFO can be affected by refinancing costs, maturity schedules, and secured/unsecured debt market conditions.
  • Environmental, compliance, and building-operations liabilities: Older properties may carry greater remediation, compliance, and operating expense risk.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Real estate securities are typically valued using REIT-specific cash-flow metrics rather than traditional earnings multiples. Market pricing often reflects:

  • AFFO/FFO yield and growth expectations (cash earnings power and durability of distributions)
  • NOI trajectory and same-property operating performance (occupancy, rent growth, expense recoverability)
  • Balance sheet risk (leverage, interest-rate hedging, debt maturity profile)
  • NAV concepts (discounted value of property cash flows, adjusted for development/redevelopment assumptions)

Key drivers that move valuation include leasing and renewal momentum, cost of capital, the market’s view of office risk, and the perceived resilience of the submarkets HPP targets. In periods when investors re-rate office risk, the market’s willingness to underwrite cash-flow durability becomes the primary valuation lever.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

HPP’s long-term thesis rests on owning West Coast office assets positioned for tenant retention through geographic clustering, tenant-specific fit, and operational switching costs. The fundamental question for investors is whether HPP can maintain and upgrade asset quality while protecting cash-flow stability through leasing, renewals, and disciplined capital allocation—despite sector volatility and financing cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HPP.

zacks.com2026-07-31

HPP vs. SBRA: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?

Investors looking for stocks in the REIT and Equity Trust - Other sector might want to consider either Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) or Sabra Healthcare (SBRA). But which of these two stocks is more attractive to value investors?

zacks.com2026-07-29

Should Value Investors Buy Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) Stock?

Here at Zacks, our focus is on the proven Zacks Rank system, which emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find great stocks. Nevertheless, we are always paying attention to the latest value, growth, and momentum trends to underscore strong picks.

defenseworld.net2026-07-26

Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP) and Alexandria Real Estate Equities (NYSE:ARE) Financial Review

Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE: HPP - Get Free Report) and Alexandria Real Estate Equities (NYSE: ARE - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability. Earnings and Valuation This table

zacks.com2026-07-24

Implied Volatility Surging for Hudson Pacific Properties Stock Options

Investors need to pay close attention to HPP stock based on the movements in the options market lately.

zacks.com2026-07-24

New Strong Buy Stocks for July 24th

DK, PBF, AAL, HCI and HPP have been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List on July 24, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-24

Best Value Stocks to Buy for July 24th

DK, PBF and HPP made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) value stocks list on July 24, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-22

Hudson Pacific (HPP) Is Attractively Priced Despite Fast-paced Momentum

Hudson Pacific (HPP) made it through our 'Fast-Paced Momentum at a Bargain' screen and could be a great choice for investors looking for stocks that have gained strong momentum recently but are still trading at reasonable prices.

zacks.com2026-07-10

New Strong Buy Stocks for July 10th

CMPR, NEXA, SCCO, HPP and CLDT have been added to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) List on July 10, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-10

Best Value Stocks to Buy for July 10th

NEXA, CMPR and HPP made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) value stocks list on July 10, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-09

HPP or NTST: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?

Investors interested in stocks from the REIT and Equity Trust - Other sector have probably already heard of Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) and NETSTREIT (NTST). But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks?

prnewswire.com2026-07-07

THE ONLY AGENCY APPOINTS NATE YOHANNES AND CHRISTY HAUBEGGER TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS

/PRNewswire/ -- The Only Agency (TOA), the premier talent agency representing the world's most influential stylists, taste makers, culture influencers and

zacks.com2026-07-06

3 Equity REIT Stocks to Watch Amid Rising Demand Trends

PEB, HPP and STAG benefit as REIT demand rises for AI-ready infrastructure, industrial assets, lodging properties and modern offices.

businesswire.com2026-06-24

Hudson Pacific Properties Announces Date for Second Quarter Earnings Release and Conference Call

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (NYSE: HPP) today announced it will release second quarter financial results before market open on Wednesday, August 5, 2026. The company will hold a conference call to discuss the results at 9:00 a.m. PT / 12:00 p.m. ET the same day. The conference call will be available via live audio webcast on the Investors section of the company's website at HudsonPacificProperties.com. A replay of the audio webcast will also be available follow.

zacks.com2026-06-23

HPP vs. NTST: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?

Investors looking for stocks in the REIT and Equity Trust - Other sector might want to consider either Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) or NETSTREIT (NTST). But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now?

zacks.com2026-06-18

Are Investors Undervaluing Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) Right Now?

Here at Zacks, our focus is on the proven Zacks Rank system, which emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find great stocks. Nevertheless, we are always paying attention to the latest value, growth, and momentum trends to underscore strong picks.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"HPP reported Q1 2026 revenue of $181.9M and net income of -$48.0M (EPS: -$0.82). On a YoY basis, revenue fell -8.4% versus Q1 2025 ($198.5M), while net income loss widened meaningfully (from -$71.9M to -$48.0M; an improvement of +33.2% in losses, i.e., less negative). QoQ, revenue declined -28.9% from $256.0M in Q4 2025, and net losses expanded (from -$276.4M to -$48.0M; improved sequentially, but the quarter remains loss-making). Profitability deteriorated over the latest quarter: gross margin swung to -44.6% from +60.0% in Q4 2025 and from +42.9% in Q1 2025. Operating income also moved to -$14.9M versus +$47.5M in Q4 2025. Cash generation remained modestly positive: operating cash flow was $44.3M and free cash flow was $40.3M, supported by working-capital effects and non-cash items despite negative net income. Balance sheet liquidity tightened slightly (cash $162.4M vs $138.4M in Q4), but leverage remains high with total debt of ~$3.76B and equity about $2.92B. Shareholder returns are strong on momentum: the stock is up +236.6% over 1 year (high >20% threshold), with a small dividend yield (~0.15%), so total return is likely driven primarily by capital appreciation."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Q1 2026 revenue was $181.9M, down -8.4% YoY (vs. $198.5M) and down -28.9% QoQ (vs. $256.0M).

Profitability

Neutral

Margins deteriorated sharply: gross margin -44.6% in Q1 2026 vs +60.0% in Q4 2025 (and +42.9% in Q1 2025). Operating income was -$14.9M vs +$47.5M QoQ; net margin -26.4%.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Despite net loss (-$48.0M), operating cash flow was +$44.3M and free cash flow +$40.3M in Q1 2026. Dividends paid were -$0.56M; no buybacks reported.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Balance sheet remains leveraged: total debt ~$3.76B and net debt ~$3.59B. Equity was $2.92B in Q1 2026, broadly stable QoQ ($3.20B in Q4 2025), but resilience relies on cash generation.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong momentum: +236.6% 1-year price change. Dividend yield is small (~0.15%), so total returns are dominated by price appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Price is $7.54 vs consensus target ~$12.71 (upside implied). High volatility and loss-making earnings reduce quality, but Street expectations appear constructive.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

HPP delivered a strong Q1 2026 operating rebound driven by office leasing momentum and early studio stabilization. The company signed 554k sq ft of leases (49% new), lifting in-service office occupancy to 77.8% (+150 bps sequential) and lease rate to 78.4% (+140 bps). Management highlighted a robust pipeline (2.4m sq ft) with tours up 30% YoY, and emphasized AI/tech tenants as a dominant driver—nearly 60% of leasing volume in Bay Area, with more tech spillover into Seattle. Financially, core FFO increased materially and G&A fell 32%, but same-store cash NOI declined YoY due to Uber’s departure at 1455 Market, partially offset by higher Hollywood production activity. Updated 2026 core FFO guidance rose to $1.10–$1.18, supported by ~+$0.04 of Q1 outperformance and a ~+$0.09 benefit from Coyote reclassified as discontinued ops. Key execution risks remain Coyote lease wind-down costs and Los Angeles normalization, while market conditions show stronger buyer appetite in Seattle/Bay value-add versus thin LA activity.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Signed 554k sq ft of office leases in the quarter; 49% were new leases; in-service office occupancy increased to 77.8% (+150 bps sequential) and lease rate to 78.4% (+140 bps sequential).
  • Leasing pipeline increased to 2.4 million sq ft (+13% YoY) with 2.2 million sq ft tours (+30% YoY), supporting continued occupancy gains.
  • Studio performance improved: Hollywood stages 97% leased; Pier 94 reached 100% leased in Q1; Sunset Studio NOI ex-Coyote rose sequentially and was up YoY to $7.4m, driven by Sunset Las Palmas lease-up and higher activity at Sunset Bronson.
  • Coyote operational streamlining: winding down leased soundstage facilities and Atlanta operations to be earnings-neutral by year end, targeting ~$5.8m annual cash NOI improvement.

Business Development

  • 10950 Washington: agreed price and fully disposing; under contract and diligence timeline moving forward.
  • City and County of San Francisco / 1455 Market: third lease with City and County; deal expected to finalize in Q2 and effectively absorbs remaining vacancy at 1455 Market.
  • PayPal at Fourth & Traction: referenced as fully covered in remaining 2026 expirations coverage (within ~600k sq ft expiring).
  • Dell at 875 Howard: referenced as 80% covered within ~600k sq ft expiring for remainder of 2026.
  • Washington 1000: negotiations with seven office-using tenants; demand includes move-in-ready suites delivered in Q2 and further larger tenants in negotiation.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenues: $181.9m vs $198.5m prior year, primarily due to Element LA sale and office tenant move-outs (notably Uber leaving 1455 Market mid-2025).
  • G&A: declined 32% to $12.6m (from $18.5m).
  • Core FFO: $16.5m or $0.25 diluted share vs $12.9m or $0.61 diluted share prior year (management presentation focuses on per-share improvement driven by discontinued/adjustments mechanics).
  • Adjustments to FFO: $1.5m or $0.02 diluted share vs $9.8m or $0.47 prior year.
  • Same-store cash NOI: $85.2m vs $92.0m prior year, driven by lower office revenues from tenant move-outs (Uber at 1455 Market), partially offset by higher studio revenue from increased production activity.
  • Office operating bps/mix: in-service occupancy 77.8% (+150 bps sequential); lease rate 78.4% (+140 bps sequential); GAAP rents +1.8% QoQ with cash rents -2.4% QoQ (sequential improvement of 140 bps and 660 bps respectively); net effective rents +4% sequential but -2% YoY (impacted by prior-year 1455 Market lease with City/County at 1455 Market for 1455 Market).
  • Studio bps: in-service stages 72.8% leased over trailing three months; ex-Pier 94 hypothetical would be 78.2% (+370 bps sequential); Hollywood stages (ex-Pier 94) 97% leased (+280 bps).
  • Interest expense: 13% lower YoY; $5.5m savings; all debt fixed or capped.
  • Updated 2026 guidance: increased full-year core FFO range to $1.10–$1.18 per diluted share from $0.96–$1.06 (outperformance ~$0.04; and ~$0.09 benefit from reclassification of Coyote operations as discontinued ops).
  • Guidance mechanics clarification in Q&A: the $0.09 discontinued-ops benefit removes impact from continuing/core FFO; go-forward basis no longer drags earnings.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Total liquidity: $933m; includes $138m cash and $795m fully available on credit facility; credit facility fully undrawn.
  • No new buyback or debt balance amounts disclosed in transcript.
  • Capital recycling: targeting $200m of FFO-accretive non-core dispositions in 2026; 10950 Washington has agreed price and is under contract; another asset under contract.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Coyote wind-down decision: will wind down leased soundstage facilities and Atlanta-area operations; management reiterated goal to be earnings-neutral by year end; in Q&A, fleet may remain in continuing operations while leases wind down.
  • Discontinued operations reclassification: Coyote soundstages and Atlanta-area operations classified as discontinued operations beginning 2026, creating ~$0.09 guidance benefit.
  • Re-entitlement/adaptive reuse: 901 Market 164k sq ft office component to be re-entitled as residential; submission in Q2 with expected resolution by year end; evaluating mixed-use redevelopment of excess surface parking in Palo Alto, Redwood Shores, and Foster City.
  • Repositioning: 901 Market and 6040 (post-production facility) being repositioned; repositioning footage removal affected reported bps comparisons; not driven by dispositions.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Management expects occupancy and leasing pipeline to remain strong through the balance of 2026.
  • Seattle trend: management stated Seattle improvement should blossom this summer; Washington 1000 shows accelerating activity as spec suite delivery approaches.
  • Guidance timing/cadence in Q&A for same-store NOI: Q2 to improve, possibly weaker in Q3, then improve again in Q4; Q1 identified as weakest quarter due to 1455 Market/uber move-out.
  • Washington 1000 build-out expectation (for larger leases): if signed near term, move-in expected in ~12 months (Q&A answer).
  • Entitlement timing for 901 Market: targeting around year end (Q&A).

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Los Angeles fundamentals remain challenged; management described limited near-term availability concentrated in one well-leased top-tier asset, implying potential slower recovery outside that asset base.
  • Coyote wind-down could involve one-time lease termination/wind-down costs; management indicated potential early-exit payments and other wind-down expenses, but targeted cost-effectively to ~$5.8m annual cash NOI improvement.
  • Office net effective rents down YoY (-2%) due to prior-year large lease event (1455 Market City/County lease at 1455 Market), suggesting year-over-year comparability risk even while sequential trends improve.
  • Capital market backdrop: management characterized limited Westside LA transaction activity and Southern California showing good price-per-foot but not good yield numbers; general buyer appetite for yield remains constrained vs stabilized cap rate ranges.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Coyote wind-down mechanics and guidance impact: Management said the prior guidance included $0.09 assumed for items tied to winding down; updated outlook removes that from continuing/core FFO by reclassifying as discontinued operations. Go-forward basis eliminates the earnings drag rather than changing underlying operating economics.
  • Seattle/Washington 1000 leasing negotiations and pipeline composition: Management described seven deals in negotiation at Washington 1000, with four for spec suites delivering this month. They cited demand drivers including Bellevue tightness and reduced trophy sublease space, plus Seattle tours up 20% QoQ and Seattle representing 25% of total pipeline.
  • Same-store NOI and AFFO cadence through 2026: Management reiterated Q1 as weakest due to 1455 Market/Uber move-out and expected improvement in Q2, modest weakness in Q3, then improvement in Q4. For AFFO, they cited elevated recurring TI/LCs and recurring capex; runway expected to average near Q1 levels with modestly better AFFO than Q1 for rest of year.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HPP Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HPP.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HPP)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP) Financial Profile