Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) Market Cap

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. has a market capitalization of $344.5M.

Price: $17.34

-0.54 (-3.02%)

Market Cap: 344.45M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Race A. Randle

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: Real Estate - Development

IPO Date: 1994-04-25

Website: https://www.mauiland.com

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) - Company Information

Market Cap: 344.45M|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP), established in 1909 and headquartered in Lahaina, Hawaii, operates as a real estate enterprise involved in the development, management, and sale of various property types—including residential, resort, commercial, agricultural, and industrial—across the United States. The company's activities are organized into three primary divisions: Real Estate, Leasing, and Resort Amenities. The Real Estate segment focuses on the entire lifecycle of land development, encompassing planning, obtaining necessary permits, developing, and selling its land holdings on Maui. This division also offers licensed general brokerage services for properties located within the Kapalua Resort and its surrounding regions. The Leasing segment manages the rental of commercial, agricultural, and industrial land and facilities. Additionally, it handles the licensing of the company's proprietary trademarks and brand names, provides land stewardship and conservation services, and operates essential water infrastructure, including canals, reservoirs, and well systems that supply both potable and non-potable water to areas in West and Upcountry Maui. The Resort Amenities segment is responsible for overseeing the operations of the Kapalua Club. This exclusive, non-equity club program grants its members unique benefits, preferred access, and other privileges at various amenities situated within the Kapalua Resort. Overall, Maui Land & Pineapple Company owns roughly 23,000 acres of land on the island of Maui, Hawaii.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 1 Active Polls

Consensus Target Matrix

Data feed parsing pending...

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$18.21
▲ +5.00% Upside
Low Target
$13.00
-25% Risk
Median Target
$17.69
2% Mid
High Target
$21.68
25% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)344307338372363346432440434
Enterprise Value ($M)348311338371360342429437431
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-87.58-38.48-70.58388.33-90.95-9.98-56.65-51.02-58.01
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.14-4.47-3.52-8.89
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)20.1990.3174.8082.3078.9759.69126.67145.32164.21
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)10.819.5910.2411.0413.8212.9713.0312.9512.69
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-104.32-94.9170.70-151.83-151.681480.55437.90-619.75-274.38
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)91.3074.6781.9278.2558.89125.62144.37162.80
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-154.66-176.23-698.08630.46-611.42-40.66-463.88-213.46-253.44
Debt to Equity Ratio-1.500.230.140.100.120.120.100.10

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 MAUI LAND AND PINEAPPLE INC (MLP) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

MAUI LAND AND PINEAPPLE INC operates an integrated agricultural and land-asset platform in Maui, Hawaii. The economic engine combines (1) plantation ownership and management that supports pineapple cultivation and related product processing/distribution and (2) monetisation of real estate holdings through land-use rights, long-lived agricultural infrastructure, and leasing/tenancy frameworks. This structure creates an asset-specific operating model: agriculture is tied to owned land, water access, climate conditions, and established cultivation know-how, while the property base supports alternative uses and tenancy arrangements as market demand evolves.

Value capture therefore comes from both production economics (yields, input management, processing/distribution efficiency) and from the strategic value of land and development optionality embedded in Hawaii real estate.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

MLP’s monetisation generally blends transactional agricultural revenue with more recurring components tied to land occupancy and tenancy frameworks.

  • Agricultural & product revenue (transactional): Pineapple cultivation and related product sales create a revenue stream exposed to crop outcomes, commodity demand, and distribution/pricing conditions.
  • Land & tenancy economics (more recurring): Leasing/tenancy income tied to specific parcels and agricultural use supports steadier cash flow than pure commodity production.
  • Margin drivers: Operating margins depend on yield stability, harvesting efficiency, freight/logistics effectiveness for distribution, and cost control in a high-cost geographic operating environment. For the asset/land component, margins are driven by occupancy, contract terms, and the cost of maintaining and operating agricultural infrastructure.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

MLP’s moat is primarily rooted in asset specificity and long-lived land/water infrastructure rather than in software-style switching costs or network effects. In agriculture, the constraint is not “market access” alone—it is access to suitable land, cultivation conditions, and operational capability that can sustain production across cycles. MLP’s ownership/control of Maui land and embedded operational infrastructure makes it difficult to replicate quickly at scale.

Key moat characteristics:

  • Asset-specific cost advantage: Owned plantation land and agricultural infrastructure reduce dependence on short-term land procurement and provide continuity in cultivation practices.
  • Capital-lifecycle expertise: Plantation operations require process capability (planting, maintenance, harvesting logistics). This operating know-how compounds over time and is not easily transferable.
  • Geographic and regulatory reality: Hawaii land use is constrained by permitting, water access, and environmental requirements; these factors raise effective barriers to new entrants.

COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (primary competitors):

  • Dole and Del Monte: Large-scale pineapple growers and processors with broader global sourcing footprints and diversified production geographies. Their scale can compress unit costs, but they are not anchored to Maui-specific land assets in the way MLP is.
  • Chiquita: Another global fruit brand/producer with supply-chain scale and diversified crops. Chiquita’s competitive advantage typically stems from global procurement and processing networks rather than localized land-based optionality.

Contrast in industry focus: MLP’s competitive posture is tied to Maui land ownership and the operational capability of maintaining production from specific parcels. Global competitors generally compete through multi-region sourcing, diversified crop portfolios, and processing scale. As a result, MLP’s differentiation is more asset-and-location-based than purely volume/processing-based.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Land and tenancy optionality in a constrained real estate market: Hawaii land is scarce and subject to permitting constraints; that scarcity can support stable occupancy economics and long-run value of real estate holdings even when pineapple volumes face cyclical pressure.
  • Premiumization and mix management in tropical produce: Demand for high-quality tropical fruit products can support pricing/mix that rewards consistent supply and processing/distribution execution.
  • Operational resilience through agricultural systems: Improved plantation practices (yields, disease/pest mitigation, harvesting/logistics efficiency) can structurally lift unit economics over a full production cycle.
  • Cost discipline in a high-cost geography: The ability to manage labor, logistics, and inputs can improve downside protection versus growers with less control over supply-chain steps.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Weather and climate variability: Hurricanes, drought, and other climate-related impacts can reduce yields and increase replacement/maintenance costs.
  • Agricultural disease and pest pressure: Pineapple cultivation faces biological risks that can be costly and time-consuming to remediate.
  • Commodity and demand cyclicality: Pineapple product pricing and order volumes can fluctuate with consumer demand and global supply dynamics.
  • Regulatory and environmental constraints: Land use approvals, water access, and environmental compliance can limit development plans or increase operating costs.
  • Capital allocation risk: Real estate optionality can require capital deployment with uncertain timing and outcomes.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for this type of asset platform typically reflects a sum-of-the-parts logic: operating cash flows from agriculture/processing alongside a more intrinsic component tied to land value and tenancy economics. Market participants often use a blend of metrics, commonly EV/EBITDA for operating comparables and asset- or NAV-oriented frameworks for property-heavy value.

Key drivers that tend to move valuation include:

  • Sustainability of operating margins (yield stability, cost control, logistics efficiency).
  • Stability/quality of land and tenancy income (occupancy, contract durability, maintenance capex burden).
  • Real estate value perception (development optionality, regulatory pathway clarity, and capex requirements).

🔍 Investment Takeaway

MLP is best understood as a land-and-agriculture asset operator with differentiation anchored in owned plantation infrastructure, Maui-specific resource constraints, and embedded optionality in a scarce real estate market. The investment case depends on maintaining cultivation execution and protecting the economics of land/tendency income while managing agricultural and regulatory risks that can affect both volumes and the cost base.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for MLP.

fool.com2026-07-31

Which MLP ETF Is the Better Buy: Global X's MLPX or Alerian's AMLP?

Alerian MLP ETF offers a significantly higher dividend yield of 7.3% compared to Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF at 4.1%. Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has a lower expense ratio of 0.45% and has historically outperformed on total return.

zacks.com2026-07-23

3 Oil Pipeline MLP Stocks Riding on Favorable Industry Trends

Stable fee-based revenues, rising data-center gas demand and major growth projects support the Zacks Oil and Gas - Pipeline MLP industry. EPD, ET and OKE are well-positioned to benefit.

defenseworld.net2026-07-22

Maui Land & Pineapple (NYSE:MLP) Stock Price Crosses Below 200 Day Moving Average – What’s Next?

Shares of Maui Land and Pineapple Company, Inc. (NYSE: MLP - Get Free Report) crossed below its 200-day moving average during trading on Tuesday. The stock has a 200-day moving average of $16.64 and traded as low as $16.56. Maui Land and Pineapple shares last traded at $16.5850, with a volume of 10,176 shares. Wall

zacks.com2026-07-21

AXR vs. MLP: Which Land-Focused Real Estate Stock Is the Better Buy?

AMREP and Maui Land & Pineapple have different strategies, revenue mixes and valuations, but which land-focused stock looks better positioned? Let's dive in.

247wallst.com2026-07-19

This Boring Pipeline Dividend MLP Returned 2X the QQQ's Gains

Pipeline partnerships get filed under “boring” for a reason. They collect tolls on hydrocarbons and mail out K-1s at tax time.

zacks.com2026-07-14

Truce or No Truce: Buy MLP ETFs Amid Iran War for Higher Income

Iran tensions keep oil elevated, boosting the appeal of high-yield MLP ETFs. AMZA, AMLP and MLPI offer income with resilient midstream exposure.

etftrends.com2026-07-14

Visualizing Annual MLP Distribution Growth

Reliable distribution growth remains one of the most important tailwinds for midstream MLPs. After all, investors often allocate to this space primarily for its attractive yield and consistent income.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-08

Millennial Welcomes Gabon Minister of Mines to Banio Potash Project Site

Millennial Adopts Semi-Annual Reporting Under CBO 51-933 West Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 8, 2026) - Millennial Potash Corp. (TSXV: MLP) (OTCQB: MLPNF) (FSE: X0D) ("MLP", "Millennial" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that a high-level field visit to the Company's Banio Potash Project in Gabon was completed on July 5-6 by the Gabonese Minister of Mines and Geological Resources, Mr. Sosthene Nguema Nguema, as well as the Director General of Geology and Mining Support, the Director General of Mining Exploitation, the Governor of Nyanga Province, Mr.

247wallst.com2026-07-03

This MLP Income ETF Quietly Pays Higher Yield Than AMLP Using a Covered Call Overlay

MLPI takes a hybrid approach to investing in North American energy infrastructure.

fool.com2026-07-02

Energy Fund Faceoff: Vanguard Energy vs Alerian MLP. Which ETF to Buy Now?

Alerian MLP ETF provides a significantly higher dividend yield through a concentrated portfolio of 20 midstream energy partnerships Vanguard Energy ETF offers a much lower expense ratio and broader exposure across 111 integrated energy companies Vanguard Energy ETF has delivered higher total returns over the past year but carries a higher historical maximum drawdown

seekingalpha.com2026-07-02

Energy Transfer: The MLP Machine Providing Export Boom Exposure

Energy Transfer remains a Strong Buy, driven by robust 12.5% adj. EBITDA growth targets and a compelling income profile. ET trades at a 26.2% EV/EBITDA discount to peers despite sector-leading growth and resilient segment performance. Strategic investments, export terminal expansions, and SUN's acquisition-driven EBITDA surge reinforce ET's forward growth trajectory.

fool.com2026-06-29

Which Is the Better Energy ETF, the Alerian MLP or VanEck's NLR Focused on Uranium and Nuclear?

The Alerian MLP ETF has a significantly higher dividend yield and expense ratio than the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF provides exposure to nuclear power and uranium mining, while Alerian MLP ETF focuses almost exclusively on energy infrastructure.

fool.com2026-06-25

State Street Energy ETF vs Alerian MLP ETF: Which Is the Better Energy Fund?

Alerian MLP ETF provides a significantly higher dividend yield through a concentrated portfolio of energy infrastructure master limited partnerships State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF offers a much lower expense ratio and has delivered stronger total returns over the past five years While both focus on energy, the State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF targets large-cap integrated companies while the Alerian MLP ETF concentrates on midstream infrastructure

fool.com2026-06-18

Alerian MLP ETF or VanEck Uranium ETF: Which Delivers More Value?

Alerian MLP ETF offers a significantly higher dividend yield than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, but it carries a much higher expense ratio of 1.01%. While the VanEck ETF focuses on the nuclear power ecosystem, Alerian's fund concentrates almost exclusively on energy infrastructure through master limited partnerships.

seekingalpha.com2026-06-10

Energy Transfer: A Low-Risk, High-Potential MLP Play With A 7% Yield

Energy Transfer stands as a leading North American midstream MLP, well-positioned to capitalize on surging AI Data Center energy demand. ET's fee-based business model delivers robust, predictable cash flows, supporting consistent distribution growth and ongoing infrastructure expansion. Trading at an EV/EBITDA of 8.4X, ET offers a relative valuation discount versus mega-cap midstream peers, enhancing its investment appeal.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"MLP (Q1 2026, ended 2026-03-31) reported revenue of $3.41M and net income of -$2.06M (EPS -$0.10). On a YoY basis, revenue declined from $5.80M (Q1 2025) to $3.41M (down ~41.3%), and net losses widened from -$8.64M to -$2.06M (improvement of ~$6.58M; net income up ~76.1%). QoQ, revenue decreased from $4.53M (Q4 2025) to $3.41M (down ~24.7%), while net losses deepened from -$1.18M to -$2.06M (down ~74.6%). Profitability deteriorated: Q1 2026 net margin was -60.5%, worse than Q4 2025 (-26.1%). Cash flow was weak in the quarter: operating cash flow was -$2.02M and free cash flow was -$2.02M, following strong Q4 operating cash flow (+$3.72M) and positive free cash flow (+$4.79M). Balance sheet resilience appears mixed: cash fell to $3.85M from $5.30M QoQ, total assets were roughly flat ($47.9M vs. $48.0M), and equity was stable at ~$32.1M vs. ~$33.1M. There was no dividend paid. Buybacks were modestly negative (common stock issued -$0.58M; repurchases none provided). Total shareholder returns are modest: the stock price is $16.38 with +9.64% 1y_change, so no strong momentum tailwind (>20% 1y_change) is present."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue fell 41.3% YoY (5.80M to 3.41M) and fell 24.7% QoQ (4.53M to 3.41M), indicating weakening top-line trajectory.

Profitability

Neutral

Net margin deteriorated to -60.5% in Q1 2026 from -26.1% in Q4 2025. Losses worsened QoQ (net income -2.06M vs. -1.18M) though improved YoY versus -8.64M in Q1 2025.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow swung negative to -$2.02M in Q1 2026 (from +$3.72M in Q4 2025). Free cash flow was -$2.02M, reducing cash and increasing near-term funding risk.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets were essentially flat QoQ (~$47.9M). Equity slightly declined (~$32.1M vs. $33.1M). Net debt worsened to +$3.29M from net cash in Q4 (-$0.59M), but the company retains a solid cash base relative to debt.

Shareholder Returns

Fair

No dividends and no clear buyback support provided. Price return is positive but not strong (+9.64% 1y_change), so total shareholder momentum is limited.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

No price target is provided. Despite a positive 1-year price change, profitability and cash generation remain weak, which typically pressures valuation confidence.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for MLP.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (MLP)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) Financial Profile