Oscar Health, Inc.

Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Market Cap

Oscar Health, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Mark Thomas Bertolini

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Medical - Healthcare Plans

IPO Date: 2021-03-03

Website: https://www.hioscar.com

Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Healthcare

Company Profile

Oscar Health, Inc. provides health insurance products and services in the United States. The company offers Individual & Family, Small Group, and Medicare Advantage plans, as well as +Oscar, a technology driven platform designed to help providers and payor clients to engage with members and patients. It also provides reinsurance products. The company was formerly known as Mulberry Health Inc. and changed its name to Oscar Health, Inc. in January 2021. Oscar Health, Inc. was incorporated in 2012 and is headquartered in New York, New York.

Analyst Sentiment

52%
Hold

From 11 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $20.80

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$16

Median

$20

High Bound

$30

Average

$21

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$20.80
▼ -15.14% Upside
Low Target
$16.00
-35% Risk
Median Target
$20.00
-18% Mid
High Target
$30.00
22% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 OSCAR HEALTH INC CLASS A (OSCR) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

OSCAR operates as a health insurance managed-care company, underwriting medical benefits and administering member care. The value chain centers on (1) enrolling members into government-sponsored and commercial health plans (where applicable), (2) setting premium pricing based on expected utilization and risk, (3) contracting with providers to deliver care, and (4) managing the cost and quality of care through operational workflows and a technology-enabled care model.

Unlike passive insurers, OSCAR emphasizes care navigation and analytics-driven management intended to improve care coordination and reduce avoidable utilization. The company’s customer “stickiness” is less about long-term contractual lock-in and more about annual enrollment dynamics, member experience, and the compounding effect of better cost performance that supports sustainable plan economics.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue primarily derives from earned premiums and government reimbursement tied to member risk and plan performance. Monetisation is driven by the spread between premium inflows and total medical and administrative outflows. Key margin drivers include:

  • Medical cost management: the ability to control the medical loss ratio through utilization management, care coordination, and clinical pathways.
  • Administrative efficiency: technology-enabled operations, automation of claims and member servicing, and streamlined internal processes.
  • Risk adjustment and quality economics: in Medicare Advantage contexts, reimbursement and profitability are influenced by risk scores and quality/star-type performance measures.

While premium revenue is recurring by nature within a plan year, profitability depends on the company’s underwriting discipline and execution across the operating cycle.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

OSCAR’s competitive positioning can be understood as an “integrated ecosystem” moat: technology + operations + provider coordination designed to improve the cost and quality outcomes that determine plan economics under highly regulated reimbursement frameworks.

Primary Moat: Integrated Ecosystem with Operational Data Advantage

  • High barriers to entry from regulated scale economics: participation in government-sponsored programs and sustained contracting and compliance capabilities create structural hurdles that slow new entrants.
  • Switching friction via service performance: members can change plans at renewal cycles, but positive service experience and consistent provider access can reduce churn relative to peers.
  • Cost advantage from analytics-enabled utilization management: better forecasting and targeted interventions can reduce avoidable utilization and administrative leakage, improving the margin structure over time.

Competitive benchmarking (industry focus and rivals):

  • Humana: a large, diversified Medicare Advantage player with extensive provider contracting and mature operating processes.
  • UnitedHealthcare: scale leader with broad network leverage and advanced risk/administrative infrastructure.
  • Clover Health (and similar digital-health oriented Medicare Advantage plans): shares an emphasis on technology-enabled care management, competing on clinical workflows and member experience.

OSCAR’s industry focus skews toward technology-forward care delivery and operational workflows within insurance administration, competing against both scale incumbents (Humana, UnitedHealthcare) and digital-oriented Medicare Advantage peers (e.g., Clover Health). The differentiation is not patent-protected technology, but operational execution that influences medical cost outcomes and plan performance under reimbursement rules.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Demographic tailwinds: aging populations expand the addressable pool for Medicare Advantage and related managed care offerings.
  • Shift toward value-based care: payer incentives tied to quality and outcomes support demand for care coordination and utilization management capabilities.
  • Provider ecosystem deepening: long-run contracting and coordination improvements can enhance network effectiveness and reduce avoidable utilization, improving member and plan-level economics.
  • Data and process maturation: sustained investment in underwriting, claims operations, and clinical programs can compound to lower unit costs and improve medical cost control.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the TAM expansion is driven by managed care adoption and program penetration, while competitive share gains hinge on maintaining underwriting discipline and demonstrating consistent plan performance.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and reimbursement risk: changes to Medicare Advantage reimbursement methodologies, risk adjustment, quality measures, or benefit rules can alter profitability and underwriting assumptions.
  • Medical cost volatility: utilization shocks, provider practice pattern changes, or higher-than-expected severity can pressure medical loss ratios and margins.
  • Competitive pricing pressure: sustained premium competition can compress margins, particularly if competitors bid aggressively while maintaining similar risk pools.
  • Execution risk in care model effectiveness: technology and clinical programs must translate into measurable cost and quality improvements; otherwise, the operating cost base may rise faster than benefits.
  • Concentration in operating geographies: health plans are exposed to local provider dynamics, regulatory differences, and network cost inflation.

📊 Valuation & Market View

In managed care, markets commonly place emphasis on operating quality rather than simple near-term earnings optics. Valuation frameworks often track expectations for:

  • Membership growth and retention (supported by service performance and network access)
  • Medical cost ratio trends and administrative cost discipline
  • Quality/star-type performance and risk adjustment that influence revenue reliability
  • Free cash flow trajectory as premium inflows convert to distributable earnings

Depending on the company’s profitability profile and growth stage, the market’s valuation can be anchored by revenue multiple heuristics (e.g., price-to-sales) and narrative expectations for margin normalization. The key drivers moving the needle are sustainability of cost performance, underwriting accuracy, and the durability of reimbursement economics.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

OSCAR’s long-term thesis rests on whether an integrated, technology-enabled operating model can deliver durable medical cost control and administrative efficiency within a tightly regulated reimbursement environment. The core competitive advantage is not contractual lock-in, but execution-driven differentiation: improved utilization management and operational learning that support plan performance against scale incumbents and other digital-oriented managed care providers. The investment case is strongest when underwriting discipline and quality-linked economics consistently translate into structurally better margin outcomes.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"OSCR reported Q1’26 revenue of $4.65B and net income of $679.0M (EPS: $2.28). On a YoY basis, revenue declined (Q1’26 vs Q1’25: $4.65B vs $3.05B) which is a +52.6% YoY increase, while net income more than doubled (+146.5% YoY: $679.0M vs $275.3M). QoQ, revenue jumped sharply (+65.7% vs Q4’25: $4.65B vs $2.81B) and net income improved from a loss in the prior quarter (from -$352.6M in Q4’25 to +$679.0M in Q1’26). Profitability improved meaningfully: Q1’26 net margin was 14.6% versus -12.6% in Q4’25, indicating a strong margin expansion off a very weak base. Over the last four quarters, margins appear volatile—Q2–Q4’25 were loss-making—then reverted to profitability in Q1’26. Cash flow quality strengthened: operating cash flow was $2.62B in Q1’26 with free cash flow of $2.61B; this compares favorably to $0.66B operating cash flow in Q4’25. The company shows no dividends and no buybacks in the provided quarter. Total shareholder return should be supported by strong price momentum: the stock is up 27.85% over the last year, combining capital appreciation with a zero dividend yield. Balance sheet resilience is improved with higher liquidity: cash and short-term investments rose to $6.80B (from $3.99B in Q4’25). Equity also increased to $1.67B (from $0.98B in Q4’25)."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue rose +65.7% QoQ ($4.65B vs $2.81B) and +52.6% YoY ($4.65B vs $3.05B), signaling a sharp rebound in Q1’26.

Profitability

Strong

Net income swung to profitability: +$679.0M in Q1’26 vs -$352.6M in Q4’25; +146.5% YoY. Net margin expanded to 14.6% from -12.6% QoQ, though prior quarters in 2025 were loss-making (high volatility).

Cash Flow Quality

Strong

Operating cash flow was strong at $2.62B and free cash flow was $2.61B in Q1’26, up from $0.67B operating cash flow in Q4’25. No dividends and no repurchases indicated, so cash is not being returned yet.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Liquidity improved materially (cash + short-term investments $6.80B vs $3.99B QoQ). Equity increased to $1.67B from $0.98B. Debt remains relatively small (total debt ~$0.43B) versus the cash position.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Total shareholder return is supported by strong capital appreciation: 1Y price change +27.85%. Dividend yield is 0% and no buybacks were shown in the quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target of $16.75 vs current price $15.79 implies modest upside (~6%). Price momentum is strong, but valuation signals are less compelling than the recent operating rebound.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

OSCR delivered strong Q1 2026 operating momentum: revenue rose 53% to $4.6B, MLR improved 490 bps to 70.5%, and earnings from operations increased to $704M (nearly 2.5x). SG&A ratio improved 60 bps to 15.2% (company’s lowest), supporting operating margin of 15.2% (+540 bps). Net income reached ~$679M ($2.07 diluted EPS), the highest in company history. However, the call’s key tension is risk adjustment. Q1 risk adjustment transfer tracked around ~24% (and ~24.5% cited) versus a ~20% full-year expectation. Management attributed the gap to seasonally low claims, higher bronze/new-member mix delaying deductible utilization, and claims-seasonality timing—expecting normalization as members engage benefits through the year. Prior-period development was favorable ($68M net), but remains a variable. Guidance was reaffirmed across revenue, MLR, SG&A, and operating earnings ranges, with Q2 emphasized as the first claims-based signal for market morbidity.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • AI-driven member services and operations improving SG&A ratio (AI impact cited as accelerating) and supporting growth/retention
  • New transparency tools, including real-time drug pricing predicting when costs could cause prescription abandonment and routing to lower-cost pharmacies/alternatives
  • Scaling bilingual voice agents to improve care navigation speed-to-care
  • ICHRA momentum: traction from employers seeking predictable costs; launch of ICHRA X plug-and-play data exchange for carriers, benefit brokers, and ICHRA platforms
  • Lucie Health Marketplace launch: carrier-agnostic shopping platform built on 1 of 11 CMS-approved systems to expand consumer shopping and bundling across ACA plans plus ancillary/supplemental products

Business Development

  • ICHRA X announced as connecting carriers, benefit brokers, and ICHRA platforms (ecosystem partners referenced broadly rather than specific names)
  • Lucie Health Marketplace: Allstate Health listed as joining the platform, along with Aflac and Guardian (plus other tools mentioned as supporting ancillary purchases)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue $4.6B (+53% YoY); affirmed full-year revenue guidance $18.7B to $19.0B
  • SG&A ratio improved 60 bps YoY to 15.2% (lowest in company history); CFO guidance unchanged at 15.8% to 16.3%
  • MLR improved 490 bps YoY to 70.5%; impacted by $68M favorable development from prior-year claims run-out (vs $31M unfavorable in prior-year period)
  • Operating margin 15.2%, up 540 bps YoY
  • Net income approx. $679M ($2.07 diluted EPS), up $404M YoY
  • Earnings from operations $704M; up $407M YoY (nearly 2.5x)
  • Adjusted EBITDA $727M; up ~$398M YoY
  • Risk adjustment: Q1 risk adjustment transfer as % of premium discussed around ~24% tracking vs full-year expectation ~20% in 2026; management attributes interim higher risk adjustment to seasonally low Q1 claims and bronze/new-member deductibles not yet fully realized
  • Taxes/fees characterized as fixed at ~9% to 10% of membership

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash and investments ended Q1 at approx. $8.1B (includes $279M at parent); insurance subsidiaries capital and surplus approx. $1.7B, including $809M excess capital
  • No buyback amounts or incremental debt/cash runway changes were disclosed in the provided transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Expect gradual churn through the rest of 2026, consistent with pre-ARPA levels; Q2 start guidance approx. 3.0M paid members (after ~3.2M end of Q1)
  • Member drop-off (~200k) between Jan/April: majority cited as people who never made a payment; delinquent members move to non-claim-paying status (no advance claim payments once delinquent)
  • Q1 risk adjustment seasonality explained: seasonally low first-quarter medical claims drive higher risk adjustment accrual as an offset
  • Risk adjustment guidance reiterated: ~20% of direct premiums for 2026; management expects normalization as members engage deductibles and utilization develops
  • Upcoming signal timing: Q2 becomes first claims-perspective report to better read market morbidity

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2026 guidance reaffirmed: revenue $18.7B to $19.0B; MLR 82.4% to 83.4%; SG&A expense ratio 15.8% to 16.3%; earnings from operations $250M to $450M; adjusted EBITDA roughly $115M higher than earnings from operations
  • Risk adjustment as % of direct premiums expected to be approximately ~20% in 2026
  • Market contraction tracking: Wakely report indicates contraction in-line to favorable relative to company’s 20% to 30% estimate; first 2026 Wakely report expected in Q2 (for added clarity)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Market morbidity uncertainty: management remains cautious early in year; relies on ongoing weekly/report signals and expects to refine accruals as claims develop through Q2 and subsequent reports
  • Interim risk adjustment volatility: Q1 tracking (~24% to ~24.5%) above the ~20% full-year target due to seasonally low claims and higher new-member/bronze mix; requires normalization later in the year
  • Prior-period reserve dynamics: favorable Q1 prior-year development ($68M) could reverse or differ versus expectations in later quarters (longer-tail effect also mentioned)
  • Operational/plan economics affected by member engagement timing (bronze deductibles and benefits not fully realized early year)
  • Competitive distribution and subsidy environment: enhanced premium tax credits sunset referenced as a headwind in payment rates, though management cited modestly favorable results vs plan expectations; competitor exits/distribution shifts could continue to alter enrollment flows

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Risk adjustment path vs target: Multiple analysts asked why Q1 risk adjustment transfer ran ~24% (and ~24.5% cited) versus the 20% full-year guide. Management said it’s driven by seasonally low Q1 claims, plus more new members in bronze; they expect moderation as deductibles are hit over the year.
  • PPD and reserve safety: Analysts probed whether the higher risk adjustment level included any sweep/cleanup of 2025 accruals and how claims development affected guidance. Management said 24% is claims-driven, reserves remain based on pricing morbidity assumptions (no Wakely reserve change). PPD was net favorable $68M: $85M adverse in some states offset by ~$150M favorable run-out, with positives not booked awaiting final reporting.
  • SG&A mechanics under risk adjustment: An analyst questioned why SG&A ratio was 15.2% while revenue was “suppressed” by risk adjustment versus the 20% guide. Management replied that SG&A dollars grew 46% while revenue grew much faster (+53%), implying strong leverage; Q1 is the lowest SG&A ratio of the year, with sideways-to-slightly-up normalization and higher Q4 expenses for open enrollment.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the OSCR Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Financial Profile