SSR Mining Inc.

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) Market Cap

SSR Mining Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Rodney Antal

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Gold

IPO Date: 1996-08-01

Website: https://www.ssrmining.com

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

SSR Mining, Inc. is a metals mining company with assets located in four jurisdictions: the USA, Turkiye, Canada, and Argentina, which engages in the operation, acquisition, exploration and development of precious metal resource properties. The firm produces gold ore as well as copper, silver, lead and zinc concentrates. It operates through the following business segments: Copler, Marigold, Crippler Creek and Victor, Seabee and Puna. The company was founded on December 11, 1946 and is headquartered in Denver, CO.

Analyst Sentiment

90%
Strong Buy

From 10 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $39.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$39

Median

$39

High Bound

$39

Average

$39

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$39.00
▲ +52.22% Upside
Low Target
$39.00
52% Risk
Median Target
$39.00
52% Mid
High Target
$39.00
52% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 SSR MINING INC (SSRM) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

SSR Mining is a precious-metals producer focused primarily on gold, with value also supported by byproducts where present. The core value chain follows a standard mining operating model: (1) develop and access ore through ongoing mine planning, (2) extract ore using open-pit and/or underground methods, (3) process ore through onsite or centralized processing infrastructure, and (4) sell finished metal under prevailing market pricing and contract terms.

The economic “stickiness” is operational rather than customer-based. Once mines and processing circuits are built, SSR Mining must sustain production with disciplined capital allocation, cost control, and reserve management. The practical barrier for a competitor to replicate production quickly is the time and permitting required to secure ore access and build or re-tool physical infrastructure—an advantage reflected in the company’s ongoing focus on operational reliability and mine-life optimization.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is driven by spot/benchmark-linked pricing for gold (and any byproducts), multiplied by realized sales volumes net of refining and sales costs. Monetisation is predominantly transactional: metal is produced and sold rather than delivered under long-term service or subscription contracts.

Margin structure is governed less by revenue mix and more by cost discipline:

  • Cash cost position: fuel, power, labor, consumables, and mining contractors influence unit economics.
  • Processing efficiency: recovery rates and throughput determine how much payable metal emerges from a ton of ore.
  • Sustaining capital needs: maintaining production requires recurring investment; the spread between operating cash flow generation and sustaining spend is the key driver of long-run returns.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

SSR Mining’s moat is primarily a cost-and-infrastructure advantage rooted in its producing asset base and operational execution. While mining does not exhibit software-style switching costs, competitors face practical barriers tied to:

  • Low-cost production capability: a durable advantage when a mine maintains favorable ore quality, mining efficiency, and recovery performance across cycles.
  • Logistical and processing infrastructure: operating sites with established processing circuits reduce marginal build time and lower effective “time-to-production” risk.
  • Permitting and operating know-how: regulatory approvals, community relationships, and site operational learning curves create intangible friction for entrants.

Competitive benchmarking (gold miners):

  • Newmont and Barrick Gold: Large-scale, globally diversified producers with extensive exploration budgets and multiple operating hubs. Their scale can support breadth of reserves and stronger bargaining power for inputs, but their asset portfolios span more jurisdictions and operating profiles.
  • Kinross: Another mid-to-large producer with multi-asset exposure and operational focus on cost control and reserve continuity.

SSR Mining differs by emphasizing a portfolio focused on achieving competitive unit costs through operational reliability and disciplined capital allocation, rather than competing solely on exploration scale or geographic breadth.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth over a 5–10 year horizon is less about “volume growth at any price” and more about compounding per-ounce economics and reserve durability:

  • Reserve life extension and resource conversion: ongoing exploration and development work can convert geological potential into production-ready reserves, supporting long-run cash generation.
  • Brownfield improvements: incremental upgrades to mine plans, sequencing, and processing efficiency can improve recoveries and reduce unit costs without requiring full greenfield redevelopments.
  • Cycle resilience: a consistent focus on sustaining capital discipline helps preserve production through commodity cycles, protecting the ability to reinvest when conditions improve.
  • Gold demand fundamentals: gold’s structural role as a monetary reserve and hedge supports long-term demand, providing a durable backdrop for the industry’s value proposition.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price volatility: gold pricing drives revenue and materially affects free cash flow and valuation sensitivity.
  • Cost inflation: energy (power and fuel), labor, reagents, and contractor rates can compress margins, especially when operating grades and recoveries face stress.
  • Operational execution risk: lower-than-planned grades, recovery variability, equipment reliability, and geotechnical challenges can disrupt throughput and costs.
  • Regulatory and permitting risk: changes in environmental requirements, water management, and tailings standards can increase sustaining capital and constrain operational flexibility.
  • Geopolitical and FX risk: operating footprints across multiple countries introduce currency exposure and country-specific policy risk.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values gold producers using a blend of enterprise value to operating cash flow (EV/EBITDA) and NAV-based models that reflect ounces, cost curves, reserve life, and discount rates. Key valuation movers include:

  • Cost curve credibility: confidence in sustaining all-in costs and recovery performance through the cycle.
  • Reserve and life-of-mine quality: reserve durability and conversion track record reduce “replacement risk.”
  • Jurisdictional risk and execution track record: permitting certainty, ESG compliance, and operational reliability can warrant valuation premiums.
  • Capital intensity: the relationship between operating cash flow and sustaining/development capital determines long-run per-share value creation.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

SSR Mining’s long-term investment appeal rests on a production-cost and infrastructure-driven positioning in gold mining. The principal competitive advantage is the ability to sustain a competitive per-ounce cost profile through disciplined operational execution and mine/reserve continuity, supported by logistical and processing infrastructure embedded in its operating sites. For investors, the core diligence focus should be on cost resilience, recovery performance, reserve durability, and the ability to maintain permitting and ESG compliance without materially impairing sustaining capital efficiency.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"SSRM delivered a strong Q1’26: Revenue was $581.8M, up +10.0% QoQ (+$52.0M from Q4’25) and up +83.7% YoY (+$265.2M vs Q1’25). Net Income rose to $369.7M, up +100.8% QoQ (from $184.2M in Q4’25) and +529.1% YoY (from $58.8M in Q1’25). EPS was $1.23 (diluted $1.16), up vs $0.90 in Q4’25 and vs $0.28 diluted in Q1’25. Profitability expanded meaningfully across the quarters. Net margin improved from 34.8% (Q4’25) to 63.6% (Q1’26), and from 18.6% (Q1’25) to 63.6%—a major step-up, consistent with much higher operating income ($300.4M) and EBITDA ($338.9M). Operating cash flow was $299.6M and free cash flow was $210.8M, indicating strong earnings-to-cash conversion despite reported net income being negative in the cash flow section. Balance sheet resilience is high: $674.4M cash & short-term investments, minimal debt (total debt $91k; net debt -$634.0M). Over shareholder value, dividend payments are $0 and buybacks are reported as $0 in this dataset; total return can’t be quantified because price/1Y change is unavailable."

Revenue Growth

Strong

Q1’26 revenue $581.8M: +10.0% QoQ and +83.7% YoY, showing a clear acceleration vs both prior quarter and prior-year quarter.

Profitability

Strong

Net margin jumped to 63.6% in Q1’26 from 34.8% (Q4’25) and 18.6% (Q1’25). Net income +100.8% QoQ and +529.1% YoY with EPS $1.23.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Operating cash flow $299.6M and free cash flow $210.8M in Q1’26 support strong cash generation. Note: cash flow statement shows netIncome -$115.2M, so conversion metrics should be interpreted cautiously.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Strong

Very strong liquidity with $674.4M cash & short-term investments and essentially no debt; net debt improved to -$634.0M in Q1’26. Equity base remains robust ($5.23B total equity).

Shareholder Returns

Positive

No dividends or buybacks reported this quarter. Total shareholder return cannot be assessed because marketPerformance/1Y price change is unavailable (shown as undefined).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus price target is $42 (high/low/median/consensus all $42). With current price/valuation context missing from marketPerformance, upside/downside vs the market cannot be quantified here.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

SSRM delivered a strong Q1 2026 with aligned production (110k GEO) at $2,433/oz AISC, ~$600M revenue, and $211M free cash flow from continuing operations. Liquidity improved sharply: cash of $634M (including a $87.5M Carlton Tunnel contingent payment) and zero debt after March convertible-note redemption, complemented by $300M share repurchases and an April pace of additional purchases. Operational momentum was asset-specific: Puna produced >$120M site free cash flow on realized silver prices >$90/oz; CC&V generated >$120M mine site free cash flow in Q1 and ~$325M since acquisition, exceeding consideration within ~12 months. The near-term strategic driver is the Çöpler sale, targeted for Q3 regulatory close, adding $1.5B cash. Key execution risks are regulatory timing for Çöpler, Seabee weather/ice-road cost timing, and remaining cost sensitivity to oil/royalties despite hedging (hedged 2026 sensitivity $7–$10 per $10/bbl). Overall tone is constructive and cash-return/portfolio reset focused.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Marigold updated life-of-mine plan within 12 months incorporating Buffalo Valley; focus on mine-life extensions and trade-offs across New Millennium/Mackay Pit, Buffalo Valley, and southern areas
  • Brownfield growth advancement across Puna (laybacks at Chinchillas pit; Malena target open-pit potential; Cortaderas underground) and Seabee (Santoy higher-grade at depth; Porky new mining front for future mine life extension)
  • Strategic review update for Hod Maden in coming months (options include building through to sale or removing exposure via sale/alternative structures)
  • Çöpler transaction close before end of Q3 2026; expected to add $1.5B cash and further strengthen free-cash-flow-driven capital allocation

Business Development

  • Definitive agreement to sell SSR Mining’s interest in the Çöpler mine for $1.5 billion cash (progressing; targeted close before end of Q3 2026, before end of 2026 mentioned for closure timing)
  • Cripple Creek & Victor (CC&V) acquisition completed end of Feb 2025; contingent milestone payment with Newmont: $87.5M paid in Q1 2026 tied to Carlton Tunnel milestone
  • Cengiz Holdings transition discussions as part of Çöpler transaction; cooperation described as “very good”
  • Ministry of Mining and Energy regulatory approvals awaited for Çöpler closing

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Production: 110k gold-equivalent ounces at AISC of $2,433/oz (aligned with expectations)
  • Revenue: nearly $600M in Q1; 113k gold-equivalent ounces of sales
  • Earnings: net income from continuing operations $1.16/diluted share; adjusted net income $1.15/diluted share
  • Free cash flow: $211M from continuing operations; Puna delivered >$120M site-level free cash flow; CC&V delivered >$120M mine site free cash flow in Q1 and ~$325M since acquisition
  • Balance sheet: cash $634M at quarter-end including $87.5M contingent payment to Newmont; zero debt after full redemption of convertible notes in March; total liquidity $1.1B
  • Share repurchases: $300M completed during/after Q1; >9M shares repurchased in April
  • Cost/fuel sensitivity: each $10/bbl oil increase implies +$7 to $10/oz in consolidated AISC (for remainder of 2026 with hedge program through end of this year); absent 2027 hedges, sensitivity roughly doubles to ~$20/oz
  • Discontinued operations: Çöpler classified as discontinued; results reflect a one-time non-cash fair value adjustment on sale announcement
  • Royalty cost pressure at Marigold attributed to higher gold prices; nearly three-quarters of Marigold+CC&V diesel hedged for this year via zero-cost collars executed late 2025 (extends through 2026)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share buybacks: $300M in Q1; additional >9M shares repurchased in April (after authorization used); authorization later described as “totally exhausted”
  • Convertible notes: fully redeemed in March; balance sheet debt-free as of March
  • Cash runway: $634M cash at end of Q1; total liquidity $1.1B; Çöpler proceeds expected to add $1.5B cash upon closing

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Safety/culture: commencing implementation of “I Care We Care” program as safety leadership/culture initiative
  • Production weighting guidance: Marigold full-year production expected 55% to 60% weighted to second half; higher sustaining capital expected in Q2 and Q3
  • Marigold: AISC expected to peak in 2026 driven by timing of fleet replacements/upgrades; near-mine drilling high-grade intercepts at DG-80 targets southwest of Mackay Pit; evaluating longer-term open pit expansions at New Millennium
  • CC&V: higher-than-expected recoveries; trade-off studies and potential future mineral reserve conversion to improve longer-term production/cost profile
  • Seabee: extreme cold caused temporary processing plant downtime; Q1 influenced by winter road season costs; development-focused strategy continues with production “fourth-quarter heavy”
  • Puna: record fifth consecutive quarter of processing plant efficiency improvements; mining focused on waste stripping; average realized silver price >$90/oz enabled >$120M mine site free cash flow in Q1

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Marigold production: 55% to 60% weighted to second half of 2026; AISC expected to peak in 2026
  • AISC oil sensitivity remainder of 2026: +$7 to $10/oz per +$10/bbl oil move (hedged through end of this year)
  • Seabee: still on track for full-year guidance ranges; production progressively improves through the year with a “big quarter” in Q4
  • Çöpler closing timeline: regulatory approvals pending; expect close by Q3; targeted close before end of third quarter; cash proceeds expected to add $1.5B

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Fuel/oil price volatility despite hedges: sensitivity remains +$7 to $10/oz per $10/bbl move for 2026, potentially doubling (~$20/oz) if 2027 hedging not implemented
  • Marigold royalty cost pressure driven by higher gold prices
  • Seabee operational risk from extreme cold and winter road season effects (temporary processing downtime; higher Q1 costs)
  • Regulatory approval dependency for Çöpler closing (awaiting Ministry of Mining and Energy)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Hod Maden strategic review timeline and “minimal costs”: Management said the review considers options from building through sale to restructuring exposure. For costs, most Q1 spend (~$31M) is early site works; management expects future spending during review to be “much lower,” toward the lower end, not zero.
  • Carlton Tunnel contingent payment and Amendment 14 permitting linkage: Management clarified the $87.5M milestone is separate from Amendment 14. Carlton Tunnel discussions relate to long-term water discharge management and are Newmont-led, while Amendment 14 is a Cripple Creek expansion permitting pathway constrained by already-in-process work at acquisition.
  • Fuel sensitivity and hedging assumptions: Management explained the $7–$10 per $10 oil move into consolidated AISC assumes hedges through end of this year (i.e., provides protection for 2026). Without hedges going into 2027, the sensitivity roughly doubles to ~$20/oz; only ~10% of operating costs are fuel.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SSRM Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) Financial Profile