Target Corporation

Target Corporation (TGT) Market Cap

Target Corporation has a market capitalization of $55.67B.

Price: $122.57

-1.28 (-1.03%)

Market Cap: 55.67B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Michael J. Fiddelke

Sector: Consumer Defensive

Industry: Discount Stores

IPO Date: 1967-10-18

Website: https://corporate.target.com

Target Corporation (TGT) - Company Information

Market Cap: 55.67B|Sector: Consumer Defensive

Company Profile

Target Corporation operates as a general merchandise retailer in the United States. The company offers food assortments, including perishables, dry grocery, dairy, and frozen items; apparel, accessories, home décor products, electronics, toys, seasonal offerings, food, and other merchandise; and beauty and household essentials. It also provides in-store amenities, such as Target Café, Target Optical, Starbucks, and other food service offerings. The company sells its products through its stores; and digital channels, including Target.com. As of March 09, 2022, the company operated approximately 2,000 stores. Target Corporation was incorporated in 1902 and is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Analyst Sentiment

57%
Buy

From 38 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $130.20

▲ +6.2% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$81

Median

$130

High Bound

$155

Average

$130

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$130.20
▲ +6.23% Upside
Low Target
$81.00
-34% Risk
Median Target
$130.00
6% Mid
High Target
$155.00
26% Max
Consensus
Hold
27 / 60 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMay 2, 2026Jan 31, 2026Nov 1, 2025Aug 2, 2025May 3, 2025Feb 1, 2025Nov 2, 2024Aug 3, 2024
Market Cap ($M)55,67058,49047,77842,06745,35544,30362,99769,40164,366
Enterprise Value ($M)56,68559,50562,58058,28660,98460,45378,11085,36779,607
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)16.1218.7211.4315.2612.1310.6914.2820.3213.50
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.5665.222.120.7023.943.60
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.522.301.571.661.801.862.042.702.53
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)3.393.572.962.712.942.964.304.794.46
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)13.3881.6920.89282.3344.95-86.0326.63826.2140.25
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)2.342.052.312.422.542.533.333.13
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)7.0630.3128.3233.3628.9726.4634.5343.7833.20
Debt to Equity Ratio0.130.281.261.291.301.271.361.341.30

TGT Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$122.57
Intrinsic Value$123.60
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 0.8%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: -1%-1%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$4.30B
Perpetuity TV Value$80.95B
Discounted TV (PV)$34.19B
TV Weighting %57.0%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 TARGET CORP (TGT) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Target operates a large-format omnichannel retail model combining a store network with a scaled digital fulfillment capability. Customers discover and purchase through physical stores, a web/app storefront, and fulfillment options such as ship-from-store and last-mile delivery. The value chain is built around: (1) centralized sourcing and merchandising, (2) inventory planning across stores and distribution, (3) store-based physical retailing paired with digital demand capture, and (4) logistics and returns processing that convert demand into efficient throughput.

Operationally, the business depends on maintaining merchandise execution (assortment, pricing, promotional cadence) and inventory discipline (reducing markdown risk and stockouts) while using scale to spread fixed costs across a large footprint.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily transactional, generated through sales of general merchandise and consumer categories (e.g., apparel, home, seasonal, entertainment/media, consumables where applicable). Monetisation is influenced less by subscription-like recurring fees and more by:

  • Omnichannel mix: store sales, online sales, and the cost-to-serve different fulfillment methods.
  • Gross margin drivers: product category mix, supply chain pricing, and inventory clearance/markdown outcomes.
  • Operating leverage: fixed-cost coverage from volume, labor productivity, shrink control, and distribution efficiency.

While the revenue base is transactional, the model can exhibit quasi-recurring behavior through customer retention (repeat shopping habits, loyalty engagement, and convenience of fulfillment). In practice, the key margin levers are merchandise margin sustainability and the efficiency of fulfillment and returns operations.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Target competes with large retailers across discount, department-store, and specialty hybrids. Its most defensible positioning is typically expressed through scale-enabled cost advantages plus a curated merchandising approach that differentiates the shopping trip.

  • Scale / Distribution leverage (Cost Advantage): Target’s purchasing power, distribution footprint, and logistics systems help spread overhead and lower average cost per unit versus smaller regional players. This supports competitive pricing without fully sacrificing margin.
  • Private label resistance (Margin durability): A meaningful private-label/owned-brand assortment can reduce dependence on branded pricing power and can offer improved gross margin resilience during promotional cycles.
  • Omnichannel execution (Operational moat): Integration of store inventory with digital demand can improve availability and reduce stockouts, supporting conversion. Competitors with weaker inventory visibility and fulfillment efficiency often face higher cost-to-serve or more frequent markdowns.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Walmart (WMT): Walmart competes aggressively on everyday low prices and immense scale. Target’s differentiation tends to come from merchandising curation and omnichannel execution rather than a pure price-led model.
  • Amazon (AMZN): Amazon’s strengths center on marketplace logistics, selection, and digital convenience. Target’s defense relies more on store-based presence and curated assortments, coupled with fulfillment options anchored by stores.
  • Kroger (KR) and large grocery-centric retailers (where overlapping consumables dynamics matter): these players often benefit from grocery scale and cadence. Target’s overlap is mitigated by category mix and the broader general merchandise focus.

Overall, Target’s competitive edge is less about network effects or switching costs in the software sense and more about economies of scale, merchandise margin quality, and omnichannel operational efficiency that are difficult to replicate quickly at the same cost structure.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

The long-term growth outlook is anchored in addressable demand for convenient retail fulfillment and in the ability to convert store real estate into omnichannel throughput. Key drivers include:

  • Omnichannel penetration: growth in online-assisted shopping and home delivery continues to expand total served demand, especially where customers value availability and fast fulfillment.
  • Store network as a fulfillment asset: leveraging stores to fulfill online demand can reduce incremental delivery costs and improve service levels when execution is strong.
  • Assortment optimization: continued improvement in merchandising and category mix can support margin and reduce earnings volatility caused by inventory misalignment.
  • Private-label expansion: owned brands can strengthen margin durability and help control promotional intensity, supporting sustainable operating margins over time.
  • Supply chain and labor productivity initiatives: efficiency gains in distribution, replenishment, and store operations can create compounding benefits because fixed costs are leveraged across higher throughput.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the TAM expansion is less about inventing new demand and more about capturing a larger share of total consumer spending that shifts toward omnichannel convenience—while maintaining margin discipline.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Promotional intensity and margin pressure: large competitors may sustain aggressive pricing, compressing gross margin through increased promotional cadence and markdown activity.
  • Inventory and demand forecasting risk: omnichannel improves conversion when inventory is accurate, but mis-forecasting can increase shrink, obsolescence, and costly clearances.
  • Cost-to-serve creep: delivery speed expectations, returns complexity, and labor market dynamics can raise fulfillment costs faster than revenue growth.
  • Technology execution: digital merchandising, inventory visibility systems, and fulfillment orchestration require ongoing investment and disciplined change management.
  • Regulatory and supply chain constraints: labor regulations, transportation costs, and trade policy can affect total landed costs and operating flexibility.

The most material downside tends to arise when margin resilience deteriorates (markdowns/promotions) while fulfillment and operating costs remain elevated—reducing operating leverage.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value large retailers through earnings power and cash flow generation, using multiples such as EV/EBITDA and P/E in practice, but fundamentals often matter more than any single metric. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Same-store sales quality: composition (traffic vs. basket size) and whether growth is achieved without excessive discounting.
  • Gross margin sustainability: private-label mix, clearance discipline, and product/category selection.
  • Operating leverage: labor productivity, shrink control, distribution efficiency, and controllable overhead.
  • Free cash flow conversion: working capital management (inventory and payables) and disciplined capex.

In competitive environments, valuation often moves with confidence that earnings can be sustained through the cycle—especially regarding inventory discipline and the ability to keep cost-to-serve from rising faster than gross profit.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Target’s enduring thesis rests on scale-enabled cost advantages, margin durability from owned-brand/private-label offerings, and store-anchored omnichannel execution that can improve service levels and convert demand efficiently. The investment case strengthens when management demonstrates disciplined inventory planning and sustained operating leverage—despite industry-wide promotional pressure and fulfillment-cost headwinds.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for TGT.

zacks.com2026-06-05

Northrop Grumman Secures Navy Contract for GQM-163A Target Support

NOC wins a $100M Navy contract to support GQM-163A target production and launch ops, running through May 2031.

zacks.com2026-06-05

Is Trending Stock Target Corporation (TGT) a Buy Now?

Target (TGT) has been one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com users lately. So, it is worth exploring what lies ahead for the stock.

investors.com2026-06-05

JPMorgan Upgrades Tesla With A Major Price Target Hike

Tesla bear JPMorgan revised its view on Elon Musk's electric vehicle company. The stock is down about 4% this week.

247wallst.com2026-06-05

Dividend Aristocrats on Sale: 5 Decades-Long Raisers Trading Below Target

Five Dividend Aristocrats with streaks ranging from 54 to 70 consecutive years of payout hikes are currently trading below Wall Street's consensus price targets, and four of the five just beat their most recent EPS estimates.

seekingalpha.com2026-06-05

Federal Realty Trust: Still Undervalued To Our Fair Value Target

Federal Realty Investment Trust offers a rare blend of quality, dividend growth, and attractive valuation among REITs. FRT's Q1 2026 results showed 10.3% revenue growth, 10.6% core FFO per share growth, and robust leasing spreads, validating its Class A property strategy. Trading at a 16% discount to fair value with a 3.9% yield, FRT is positioned for 4.5% annual FFO growth and continued dividend increases.

newsfilecorp.com2026-06-03

PTX Metals Advances Shining Tree Gold Project with Start of Drilling at Priority Ronda Target

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - June 3, 2026) - PTX Metals Inc. (TSXV: PTX) (OTCQB: PANXF) (FSE: 9PX) ("PTX" or the "Company") is advancing the next phase of its exploration activities at the Shining Tree Project, located south of Timmins in Ontario's gold belt, with drilling now underway at the priority Ronda Target. The program follows several years of technical work that has strengthened the Company's understanding of the property's geological potential and identified multiple opportunities to expand known gold and base metal mineralization within a broader emerging district-scale exploration corridor.

247wallst.com2026-06-03

Walmart vs. Target: Which Retailer Is the Better Long-Term Hold?

For retirement-focused investors weighing big-box retail exposure, the choice between Walmart (NYSE:WMT | WMT Price Prediction) and Target (NYSE:TGT) comes down to a single question: Do you pay up for the defensive compounder, or buy the discounted Dividend King with a turnaround taking hold?

newsfilecorp.com2026-06-03

Selkirk Copper's Final Phase 1 Drill Program Results Deliver High-Grade Mineralization Intersected Across Five Target Areas, and Rapid Progress on the Phase 2 Drill Program

Highlights Drilling at Area 118 has confirmed discovery of the high-grade 301 Lens beneath previous drilling: 4.39% Cu, 7.60 g/t Au, and 21.07 g/t Ag (10.22% CuEq) over 4.1 m, within a broader interval of 1.56% Cu, 2.26 g/t Au, and 7.63 g/t Ag (3.31% CuEq) over 15.7 m, from 278.6 m in 26SCM157 Within this interval, individual one-meter bornite-rich samples returned grades as high as 4.6% Cu, 23.1 g/t Au, and 26.4 g/t Ag. Drilling at Minto East continues to intersect high-grade mineralization beneath the limits of previous drilling: 3.77% Cu, 6.74 g/t Au, and 23.68 g/t Ag (8.99% CuEq) over 3.8 m, within a broader interval of 1.38% Cu, 2.34 g/t Au, and 8.67 g/t Ag (3.20% CuEq) over 11.3 m, from 639.7 m in 26SCM134 Drilling at the 117 Lens beneath the Area 2 Pit has intersected broad zones of copper-gold-silver mineralization as well as high grade intervals, including: 2.93% Cu, 1.50 g/t Au, and 16.37 g/t Ag (4.19% CuEq) over 5.0 m, from 325.4 m in 26SCM142 0.63% Cu, 0.08 g/t Au, and 1.74 g/t Ag (0.70% CuEq) over 47.9 m, from 348.1 m in 26SCM167 Drilling at Minto North continues to delineate high-grade mineralization in the 202 Lens: 3.56% Cu, 2.34 g/t Au, and 21.42 g/t Ag (5.48% CuEq) over 3.7 m, within a broader interval of 0.89% Cu, 0.49 g/t Au, and 4.84 g/t Ag (1.29% CuEq) over 21.7 m, from 195 m in 26SCM131 Drilling at Ridgetop continues to intersect broad intervals of near-surface mineralization: 0.46% Cu, 0.14 g/t Au, and 1.57 g/t Ag (0.58% CuEq) over 69.6 m, from 13.7 m in 26SCM137 The 50,000 metre Phase 2 drill program is advancing rapidly, with 14,000 metres completed during the first month of drilling.

businesswire.com2026-06-03

Solstice Gold Expands Red Cedar Discovery with Multiple High-Grade Gold Intercepts and New Polymetallic Target at the Strathy Gold Project, Ontario

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Solstice Gold Corp. (TSXV: SGC) (“Solstice” or the “Company”) is pleased to report drill results from the Company's winter-spring drill campaign, including multiple high-grade intercepts adjacent to the Red Cedar Discovery at the Strathy Gold Project (“Strathy” or the “Project”), located in the Temagami Greenstone Belt, Abitibi Subprovince, Northeast Ontario. These results confirm a broad area of gold mineralization at shallow depths with high-grade.

fool.com2026-06-02

3 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy in June

As the S&P 500 hits new highs, make sure you're diversified with secure dividend stocks.

forbes.com2026-06-02

Labor-Backed Investor Group Urges Target Shareholders To Vote Against Former CEO

Target has come under fire from a group of labor-backed investors, including, SOC Investment Group, Trillium Asset Management, and Mercy Investment Services, which is urging shareholders to vote against the company's current executive chair and former CEO, Brian Cornell, and lead independent director Christine Leahy, at Target's Annual General Meeting on June 10. The letter to shareholders was filed in a notice of exempt solicitation.

globenewswire.com2026-06-02

Bridge Logistics Properties Raises Nearly $1.4 Billion For Its Value Fund II, Exceeding $1 Billion Target

SALT LAKE CITY, June 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bridge Investment Group (“Bridge”) today announced that it has completed fundraising for the Bridge Logistics Value Fund II (“BLV II” or the “Fund”), raising nearly $1.4 billion in equity commitments for the Fund and parallel vehicles, exceeding their $1 billion target.

247wallst.com2026-06-02

Target vs Walmart: Both Fighting For The Same Customer, Only One Wins

Walmart (NYSE:WMT | WMT Price Prediction) and Target (NYSE:TGT) just delivered their Q1 results within a day of each other, and the contrast is striking.

prnewswire.com2026-06-02

New, Deep Savings for Back-to-School and Summer: Target Circle Deal Days Delivers Value with Style

Target Circle members unlock up to 45% off back-to-school and college essentials, summer-ready apparel, outdoor fun, and more from June 23–26 — helping families make the most of their budgets without compromising on style Current Target Circle 360 members get early access starting June 22 Elevated in-store experience includes free Starbucks coffeehouse treat for Target Circle members on June 23 MINNEAPOLIS, June 2, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- As U.S. consumers look for affordable ways to plan for back-to-school shopping and celebrate summer, Target Corporation (NYSE: TGT) today announced deep, new savings in its upcoming Target Circle Deal Days. The four-day sale event rewards members of the free Target Circle loyalty program with exclusive access to savings on the season's most sought-after styles and essentials.

businesswire.com2026-06-02

MindWalk's Preclinical Dengue Data Support a HYFT® Computational Prediction: Immunogens Designed on the Predicted Target Elicited Cross-Reactive Antibodies Against Antigens of All Four Dengue Serotypes, Reproduced Across Two Independent Campaigns

AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $HYFT #ai--MindWalk Holdings Corp. (Nasdaq: HYFT) today reported preclinical dengue data that support a computational prediction its HYFT® platform generated before any animal was immunized. HYFT® computationally identified a candidate pan-serotype structural target on the dengue virus. The subsequent immunization data support that prediction at the antibody-binding level: animals immunized with immunogens designed on the predicted target generated antibodies that cross-rea.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-05-02

"Target (TGT) reported Q1 2026 results with Revenue of $24.53B and Net Income of $942M (EPS $1.72). YoY, Revenue rose from $23.85B in Q1’25 to $24.53B in Q1’26 (+2.8%), while Net Income declined from $1.04B to $942M (-9.0%). QoQ, Revenue fell from $30.45B in Q4’25 to $24.53B (-19.4%), and Net Income decreased from $1.05B to $0.94B (-9.9%). Profitability was mixed: gross margin expanded slightly vs Q1’25 (26.35% vs 25.43%), but net margin contracted (3.84% vs 4.34%). Operating income fell QoQ (down 11.7%) and YoY (down 4.5%), indicating cost pressure and/or lower operating leverage in the quarter. Cash flow remained supportive but weaker than peak quarters: operating cash flow was $716M and free cash flow was $716M in Q1’26, down sharply vs Q4’25 ($2.29B FCF) and below earlier quarters. Balance sheet resilience remains good for a retailer: total assets were $58.0B and total equity $16.4B, with leverage far lower in this dataset’s net-debt measure than prior quarters (net debt $1.0B vs $14.8B in Q4’25). Shareholder returns are strong: the stock is up ~41.3% over the last 12 months, indicating strong capital appreciation; dividend yield is ~0.9%. Overall, results show modest top-line growth but pressured earnings quality, partially offset by strong market momentum."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue +2.8% YoY in Q1’26 ($24.53B vs $23.85B) but -19.4% QoQ ($30.45B in Q4’25 to $24.53B), consistent with seasonal pull-forward.

Profitability

Fair

Net Income -9.0% YoY and -9.9% QoQ. Net margin contracted to 3.84% from 4.34% YoY, despite a slight gross margin improvement (26.35% vs 25.43%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 OCF was $716M with FCF also $716M, materially below Q4’25. Working capital drove a negative change, suggesting cash earnings are softer quarter-to-quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Equity is stable at $16.4B with total assets of $58.0B. Total liabilities were $41.6B; the dataset shows much lower net debt in Q1’26 vs Q4’25, implying improved balance-sheet flexibility (subject to reporting nuances).

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total return is supported by strong capital appreciation: price is up 41.3% YoY. Dividend yield is modest (~0.9%), but buybacks (repurchased ~$89M in the quarter) add to shareholder support.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Valuation appears premium (P/E ~15.5 per provided ratios) and not obviously discounted versus consensus target range (current ~$127.84 vs consensus ~$126.63). Sentiment is mixed given earnings pressure despite strong price momentum.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Target delivered a strong Q1: net sales +6.7% YoY (+5.6% comp) and adjusted EPS +32% YoY, with gross margin expansion of +80 bps to 29%. The margin improvement reflects supply-chain productivity and mix benefits from Roundel and Target Plus, plus lower markdowns—partially offset by higher product costs. Operating margin declined on a GAAP basis (4.5%), but adjusted operating margin improved roughly +80 bps to 3.7%, despite SG&A pressure driven by investments (training/hours, incentives), marketing, and general liability. Management updated full-year net sales guidance to a ~4% center (+2 pp vs prior) and expects EPS near the top of the prior $750M–$850M range, while staying cautious due to a harder Q2 comp (nearly 2 pp vs last year) and consumer sentiment deterioration. Operationally, store experience is improving, but product findability/in-stock remain the biggest friction points, with continued upstream capacity additions (Houston receive center, Colorado DC) and a supply-chain leadership hire.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Baby and Kids assortment overhaul: back-half-quarter acceleration of baby comps by 5+ percentage points after launch of new offerings (incl. new premium services tested such as a baby Concierge).
  • Wellness expansion: added ~1,500 new items; refreshing ~40% of assortment in wellness-related categories; drove double-digit sales growth and doubled comp growth rates versus Q4.
  • Food Forward execution: introduced 3,000 new food items in Q1; sales from those items grew >50% vs prior assortment; continued push in protein, functional beverages, better-for-you snacking.
  • Toys value-led assortment: growth from new offerings priced at $20 or less, including many at $5 and $10; supported double-digit toy comp growth.
  • Merchandising transitions beginning in Q2/Q3: largest grocery center-store reset in over a decade (nearly half the assortment), accelerating pace of newness ~50%, and eliminating all certified synthetic colors from cereal.

Business Development

  • Parke collaboration: Q1 limited-time drops; social engagement exceeded prior collaborations and delivered some of the strongest launch-week sales ever for these offers.
  • Roller Rabbit collaboration: Q1 limited-time drops with stronger-than-expected engagement and sales performance.
  • Pokemon collaboration (only at Target cross-category): launch earlier in May set Target records for sales and social media engagement; another drop planned later this quarter.
  • Roundel: growth called out as a high-margin revenue stream supporting gross margin improvement.
  • Target Plus (third-party digital platform): nearly 60% growth in Q1 first-quarter GMV.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Net sales: $25.4B, +6.7% YoY; +3.7% vs two years ago.
  • Comparable sales: +5.6%; traffic +4.4% offset by -2.4% a year ago.
  • Gross margin: 29% in Q1, +80 bps YoY; driven by supply chain productivity/leverage, higher high-margin revenue (Roundel and Target Plus), and lower markdown rates, partially offset by higher product costs.
  • SG&A: 21.9% rate, >2 pp higher than last year’s 19.3% (largely due to last year’s ~$600M legal settlements). Adjusted SG&A rate was 21.7% (about 20 bps lower than this year). Adjusted SG&A growth ~7% due to investments (hours/training), higher incentives, planned capex-related spending, higher marketing spend, and higher general liability expense.
  • Operating margin: GAAP 4.5% vs 6.2% prior year; adjusted operating margin 3.7%, about +80 bps YoY.
  • Earnings: GAAP EPS $1.71 (down 24% YoY); adjusted EPS increased 32% YoY.
  • Guidance update: full-year net sales increase centered around ~4% (range updated; 2 percentage points stronger than prior range).
  • Full-year EPS posture: now expects to end near the high end of the previously stated $750M–$850M EPS range after Q1 profit upside; maintained cautious outlook.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Capital expenditures: ~$1B deployed in Q1; full-year CapEx expectation ~$5B.
  • Dividends: $516M paid in Q1; per-share dividend +1.8% YoY with lower share count partially offsetting the increase; board-requested small quarterly dividend increase later this year; long-term goal 40% payout ratio.
  • Share repurchases: no share repurchase activity in Q1; management expects potential capacity later in the year, subject to outlook and maintaining current “middle A” credit ratings.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Store experience metrics reached 3-year highs: improved NPS and satisfaction (wait times, product availability, cleanliness, team interactions).
  • Key operational friction remains: product findability and in-stock availability, especially for food and during evenings/weekends.
  • Inventory availability improvements despite stronger demand: meaningful improvement in top-item availability YoY; urgency to chase additional inventory for stronger-than-planned full-year expectations.
  • Network visibility and process connectivity: focus on upstream-to-downstream flow consistency; investments in data/network visibility.
  • Fulfillment simplification: aiming to manage growing digital demand without compromising the in-store experience.
  • Guest-experience training scale: provided >300,000 team members/leaders training.
  • Technology enablement: enhancing myDevice and performance dashboards to simplify workflows and improve visibility.
  • Store footprint: opened 7 new stores in Q1 (including the 2,000th location); on track to open >30 stores in 2026; remodels scaled with 100+ projects underway (enhanced focus on food/frequency-driving categories).
  • Supply chain network capacity: added 2 facilities—new receive center in Houston and a new food distribution center in Colorado; Houston receive center expected to process ~25M cartons annually.
  • Leadership hire: Jeff England hired as Chief Global Supply Chain and Logistics Officer to improve inventory availability, reduce transportation costs, and strengthen operational excellence.
  • Remodel/food and frequency emphasis: store investments intended to also benefit supply chain due to stores-as-hubs model (fulfilling >95% of sales from stores).
  • Beauty operational prep: Target beauty studio launching in 600+ stores in fall; work includes minimizing disruption and building robust transition plans.
  • Home merchandising transition: decorative accessories edits nearly 3/4 this quarter; further change planned for kids home and bedding later this year; kitchen/storage planned for 2027.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year net sales guidance: increase range centered around ~4% (updated; +2 percentage points vs prior range).
  • Full-year EPS: expects to finish near the high end of the prior $750M–$850M EPS range.
  • Comparison difficulty: Q2 includes hardest prior-year comparison vs other quarters; described as nearly a 2 percentage point difference as Target laps last year’s Nintendo Switch 2 launch.
  • Tax refunds: higher tax refunds provided upside to consumer spending in Q1 and management expects this benefit to feed through the rest of the year.
  • Cost headwinds: expects more challenging cost headwinds in the first half of the year, moderating in the second half.
  • Operating environment: consumers resilient but sentiment declining recently; management maintaining cautious outlook and emphasizes flexibility (not swinging too quickly on plans/inventory responses).

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Harder comps ahead: Q2 nearly a 2 percentage point tougher comparison due to lapping prior-year Nintendo Switch 2 launch.
  • Consumer demand uncertainty: sentiment has been declining; management watching spending behavior closely.
  • Operational friction still present: product findability and in-stock availability remain biggest guest frictions, particularly in food and during evenings/weekends.
  • Cost pressure: expects more challenging cost headwinds in the first half of 2026.
  • Inventory risk management preference: management prefers the scenario of chasing inventory for stronger-than-planned sales versus canceling orders/markdown excess inventory—implying planning sensitivity to demand swings.
  • SG&A optics: GAAP SG&A ratio elevated due to prior-year legal settlements; ongoing investment needs (training/hours, marketing, capex-related spending, general liability) could pressure margins.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Sustainability of growth while controlling costs (workforce cuts/SG&A): Management tied profitability to growth—P&L improves with top-line outcomes. They emphasized refreshed merchandising/guest experience priorities driving decisions and said Q1’s top-line upside translated to bottom-line outperformance despite ongoing change and planned Q2 execution.
  • Topic: What specifically is working in merchandising execution now: Cara pointed to Q1 proof points in Food Forward (+3,000 new food items; >50% sales growth from new assortment), wellness (+~1,500 new items; refresh ~40% of assortment; doubled wellness comp growth vs Q4), and Baby (5+ pp baby comp acceleration) as evidence of guest response.
  • Topic: Upcoming operational/assortment disruption risk and mitigation: Management highlighted that major transitions are planned into Q2 and beyond (grocery resetting nearly half the center-store assortment; ~50% faster newness; cereal synthetic color elimination; beauty studio in 600+ stores; home category edits). They emphasized minimizing disruption while building robust plans to support efficient transitions.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the TGT Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for TGT.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (TGT)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Target Corporation (TGT) Financial Profile