United States Antimony Corporation

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Market Cap

United States Antimony Corporation has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Gary C. Evans

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Industrial Materials

IPO Date: 2000-02-24

Website: https://www.usantimony.com

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

United States Antimony Corporation produces and sells antimony, zeolite, and precious metals in the United States and Canada. It operates in two segments: Antimony and Zeolite. The company offers antimony trioxide that is primarily used in conjunction with a halogen to form a synergistic flame retardant system for plastics, rubber, fiberglass, textile goods, paints, coatings, and paper, as well as color fastener in paints and as a phosphorescent agent in fluorescent light bulbs; antimony metal for use in bearings, storage batteries, and ordnance; and antimony trisulfide used as a primer in ammunition. The company also offers coarse and fine zeolite for soil amendment and fertilizer, water filtration, mine underground ventilation, sewage treatment, nuclear waste and other environmental cleanup, odor control, gas separation, and animal nutrition applications, as well as catalysts, petroleum refining, concrete, solar energy and heat exchange, desiccants, pellet binding, horse and kitty litter, floor cleaner, traction control, ammonia removal from mining waste, and carriers for insecticides, pesticides and herbicides. In addition, it recovers unrefined and refined gold and silver. United States Antimony Corporation was founded in 1968 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $12.63

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$12

Median

$13

High Bound

$14

Average

$13

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$12.63
▲ +149.11% Upside
Low Target
$11.75
132% Risk
Median Target
$12.63
149% Mid
High Target
$13.50
166% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 UNITED STATES ANTIMONY CORP (UAMY) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

UNITED STATES ANTIMONY CORP produces and processes antimony into saleable products used across flame-retardant materials, industrial compounds, and other specialty applications. The business follows a supply-chain model where antimony feedstock is converted into higher-value refined products. Revenue is driven by the ability to source and process antimony efficiently, meet product specifications demanded by industrial customers, and fulfill delivery requirements for a commodity that faces periodic supply tightness. This structure tends to make the company more “qualified supplier” than purely price-taking trader, since end-markets often require consistent quality, documentation, and reliable logistics.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Monetisation is primarily through the sale of refined antimony products (for example, antimony trioxide and other downstream forms), with margins influenced by the conversion “spread” between feedstock costs and refined pricing. While the underlying commodity can behave cyclically, the company’s economics are typically supported by:

  • Pricing linkage to antimony fundamentals (supply/demand balance, mine output, and refining capacity).
  • Product specification and quality differentiation that can allow participation in higher-margin segments within end-use applications.
  • Operational leverage from processing volume and utilization, which affects fixed-cost absorption at the refining stage.

Revenue is therefore best viewed as a combination of commodity-linked pricing and a processing/qualification value-add that determines realized margins.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

UAMY’s moat is primarily cost and supply advantage, reinforced by logistical and qualification barriers common to critical-mineral supply chains. Antimony refining and reliable product delivery require operational know-how, permitting, and proven performance against industrial specifications—constraints that limit fast, low-cost capacity additions.

Geographic and supply-chain positioning: UAMY’s U.S. footprint can be strategically valuable to North American customers seeking supply security and reduced exposure to concentrated overseas production. This is not a classic “lowest absolute cost” story in every cycle; rather, it is a reliability and supply assurance story where qualified domestic supply can command favorable terms during periods of tight availability.

Competitor set (industry focus contrast):

  • Major Chinese antimony producers (e.g., Xikuangshan and other large domestic producers): typically benefit from entrenched production infrastructure and scale in China.
  • Other global antimony refiners/miners: supply is spread across smaller producers and merchant refiners, often with more variable output reliability.
  • Downstream substance formulators and substitute material sourcing: some end-users can partially diversify inputs toward alternative additives or blends, placing competitive pressure on pure-refining margins.

Compared with these rivals, UAMY’s positioning emphasizes domestic production and qualified refined output for industrial buyers, rather than competing only on the lowest-cost marginal unit from the most concentrated global source regions.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, UAMY’s opportunity set is tied to three structural drivers:

  • Persistent demand for flame-retardant materials: antimony compounds support regulatory-driven safety requirements in building materials, transportation components, and industrial applications.
  • Critical-mineral supply security dynamics: government and industrial buyers increasingly value dependable sourcing for strategic inputs, which can favor domestic or regionally diversified supply.
  • Capacity and operating discipline: in commodity-linked materials businesses, incremental improvements in yield, reliability, and utilization can translate into meaningful earnings power across the cycle.

TAM expansion is less about “new applications” and more about sustained use and procurement reshoring/nearshoring incentives that reduce reliance on single-region supply chains.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity and inventory cycle risk: antimony pricing and refined spreads can compress if global supply loosens or end-demand weakens.
  • Regulatory and permitting risk: environmental permitting, tailings/effluent requirements, and hazardous-material handling standards can affect cost and schedule.
  • Concentrated supply dynamics and substitution: large overseas producers can influence global pricing; end-users can also reformulate to reduce antimony intensity where feasible.
  • Operational and quality risk: refined-material markets are specification-driven; process disruptions or off-spec batches can affect customer retention and margins.
  • Capital intensity and working-capital needs: maintaining output and managing ore/processing inventories can require disciplined funding, especially through commodity downturns.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The sector is commonly valued through enterprise value versus cash earnings power (EV/EBITDA) and, secondarily, through commodity-linked revenue/cash flow multiples. Key valuation drivers typically include:

  • Refining spread and realized margins (feedstock cost vs. refined product pricing)
  • Utilization and operating reliability (ability to convert capacity into sellable output)
  • Quality/qualification status that supports repeat demand
  • Supply-demand tightening signals that affect antimony fundamentals and the cost of alternative supply

Because the business is tied to a critical material, market narratives can also shift with policy and industrial procurement priorities, which can temporarily influence achievable terms even when general commodity levels are subdued.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

UAMY’s long-term investment case rests on a materials supply-and-processing advantage: domestic antimony refined products with the operational capacity, quality discipline, and supply-chain credibility that matter to industrial buyers. The moat is supported by geographic diversification and qualification barriers that are difficult to replicate quickly, while multi-year demand for flame-retardant applications and supply-security-driven procurement provides a durable foundation. Upside is most likely when refining spreads and utilization hold, while primary downside risk arises from commodity-cycle compression and operational or regulatory disruptions.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"UAMY reported Q1’26 revenue of $6.78M and net income of -$11.29M (EPS -$0.08). Versus Q1’25, revenue fell (QoQ/YoY trend context below) and profitability deteriorated sharply: net income moved from +$0.55M in Q1’25 to -$11.29M in Q1’26. QoQ, revenue declined to $6.78M from $13.03M in Q4’25 (-47.9% QoQ). Net income swung from a loss of -$0.29M in Q4’25 to a much larger loss of -$11.29M (+$11.0M deterioration, roughly -3840% vs Q4’25). Over the 4-quarter span, gross margin contracted from 33.9% (Q1’25) and 26.9% (Q2’25) to 16.4% (Q1’26), while operating margin moved from +5.1% (Q1’25) to -110.8% (Q1’26). Cash flow quality weakened materially. Operating cash flow was -$12.06M and free cash flow was -$24.64M in Q1’26. Capital expenditure was heavy (~$12.58M) and operating losses increased. Balance-sheet resilience looks mixed: cash was only ~$3.22M at quarter-end, while total assets were $148.0M and equity remained positive at $131.9M; however, retained earnings are deeply negative (-$56.8M). Shareholder returns appear strong on price momentum: the stock is up +202.9% over 1 year, with no dividends paid and no buybacks reported in the quarter. Analyst consensus target ($13.50) implies upside vs the $10.57 price, but valuation multiples are not meaningful during losses. Revenue and Earnings-based metrics were not applicable for this analysis due to the company's pre-revenue status. The evaluation focused on cash runway, burn rate, and market sentiment instead."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue fell from $13.03M in Q4’25 to $6.78M in Q1’26 (-47.9% QoQ). YoY direction vs Q1’25 ($7.00M) is slightly down (-3.2% YoY).

Profitability

Neutral

Net income deteriorated from +$0.55M (Q1’25) to -$11.29M (Q1’26). Margins contracted: gross margin fell to 16.4% from 33.9% (Q1’25), and net margin turned to -166.5%.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$12.06M and free cash flow -$24.64M in Q1’26, indicating high burn. No dividends and no buybacks reported; cash dropped sharply to ~$3.22M.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Balance sheet remains equity-positive (equity $131.9M) with low stated debt (total debt ~$0.18M) and net cash of about -$3.04M (net debt -). However, retained earnings are heavily negative and cash is low.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

1-year price momentum is very strong (+202.9%), supporting total shareholder return despite no dividend. Buybacks are not evident in Q1’26.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target is $13.50 vs ~$10.57 price (approx. +27.7% implied upside). Traditional valuation is distorted by losses (negative EPS).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

UAMY’s Q1 2026 update shows a classic build-and-ramp quarter: revenue was roughly flat YoY ($6.8M vs $7.0M) but profitability deteriorated as management deliberately incurred higher labor, factory and freight costs to fund capacity expansion. The net loss of $11.3M was driven largely by noncash stock compensation ($4.8M) and an unrealized securities loss ($4.1M), alongside elevated cost of goods sold. The operational story is more constructive than the income statement: zeolite shipped record volumes for cattle nutrition (+42% vs target in March; ~+66% in April), and demand is now outpacing existing infrastructure—raising the importance of automation and logistics upgrades. On antimony, the company emphasized contracting reliability (225 tons/month high-quality feed to Madero) and internal/external supply expansion for later-2026 impact. Capital flexibility improved materially through the $27M grant (partial receipt) and $48.6M stock sale proceeds, while debt remains near-zero.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Zeolite cattle-nutrition launch: delivered pricing strategy plus phased logistics/automation upgrades driving record shipments (+42% vs monthly target in March; +~66% above target in April)
  • Antimony supply infrastructure ramp: internal U.S. mining plans for Montana and Alaska in 2026 and external monthly-delivery contracts feeding Montana and Mexico smelters throughout 2026
  • Thompson Falls expansion commissioning: staged furnace ramp targeting ~80% run-rate near end of July before transitioning to emission-standard compliance work on the old plant

Business Development

  • Americas Gold and Silver: hydromet JV announced; Bolivia technical collaboration and tour in early April; metallic antimony flake produced in Bolivia shipped to Thompson Falls for conversion
  • Bolivia operating partner (JV execution): commenced metallic antimony flake production in March and prepared first shipment with third-party sampling and door-to-door shipping booked
  • Smelter supply contract relationships: signed for monthly deliveries of antimony to smelters in Montana and Mexico

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $6.8M in Q1 2026 vs $7.0M prior year (antimony segment sales -2%; zeolite segment sales -7%)
  • Gross profit: decreased by $1.3M YoY, primarily from higher labor, factory, and import/freight costs needed to support expected 2026 ramp-up
  • Net loss: $(11.3)M driven by $4.8M noncash stock compensation and $4.1M unrealized loss on Larvotto equity securities, plus higher cost of goods sold
  • Cash/financial strength: cash plus U.S. treasury and equity securities totaled $60.2M at quarter-end
  • Capital injections/cash events: received $12.8M from the $27M U.S. government expansion grant after March 31; received $48.6M gross proceeds from stock sale after March 31
  • Balance sheet: inventory increased $9.5M to $22.0M; debt remained minimal at $162K

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Received $12.8M from a $27M U.S. government expansion grant (Department of War referenced elsewhere in call)
  • Received $48.6M gross proceeds from sale of stock after March 31, 2026
  • Maintained low debt: $162K at quarter-end; cash/tresuries/marketable equity securities totaled $60.2M at quarter-end; reported additional $12.8M and $48.6M post-quarter

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Bear River Zeolite: expanded logistics for bulk delivery, added staffing ahead of multi-shift utilization, and continued automation/throughput initiatives through Q2
  • Zeolite delivered-pricing launch: freight/diesel is a new cost driver; delivered pricing introduced to compete in cattle nutrition
  • Thompson Falls (Thompson Falls processing center expansion): OEM heat-exchanger parts expected last week of May; commissioning began early May with 3 functional manual furnace lines; target ~80% near end of July; expansion capacity ~230 tons/month with 9 furnaces; old plant (~75 tons/month) to be shut 4–8 weeks for dust collector/electrical work to meet increased emission standards
  • Madero smelter (Mexico): consolidated and increased reliability in supply contracts for consistent 2026 feed; average 225 tons/month delivered; developed specialized arsenic/iron contaminant removal to produce clean antimony ingots meeting preferred sales contracts
  • Radersburg mill: lab build-out underway (target stated as July 7 grand opening mentioned by management); flotation concentrate optimization work on Stibnite Hill ore showing >60% antimony in flotation concentrates (initial tests); mill laboratory to deliver <24-hour results for real-time plant control and exploration turnaround

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • U.S. antimony supply initiatives expected to show results in the back half of 2026
  • Melissa Pagen: throughput and cost-efficiency improvements expected as automation initiatives complete in Q2
  • Grand opening timing: July 7 (governor/senators mentioned)
  • Zeolite shipment momentum: March and April both broke all-time records; demand now outpacing existing infrastructure

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Cost pressure: higher labor, factory, and import/freight costs reduced gross profit (company cited need to invest in talent/factory/inventory for ramp-up)
  • Freight/diesel: elevated freight environment created a new cost factor under delivered-pricing for cattle nutrition
  • Supply-chain/equipment delays: Thompson Falls schedule impacted by delayed heat exchanger deliveries; commissioning expected to face unexpected start-up problems
  • Operational constraints: higher upfront investment reduced early results while throughput upgrades and multi-shift scaling are still in progress

Q&A: Analyst Interest

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the UAMY Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    © 2026 Stock Market Info — United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Financial Profile