United Parcel Service, Inc.

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) Market Cap

United Parcel Service, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Carol Tomé

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Integrated Freight & Logistics

IPO Date: 1999-11-10

Website: https://www.ups.com

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

United Parcel Service, Inc., a package delivery and logistics provider, offers transportation and delivery services. It operates through two segments, U.S. Domestic Package and International Package. The U.S. Domestic Package segment offers time-definite delivery services for express letters, documents, packages and palletized freight through air and ground services. The International Package segment provides small package operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Canada and Latin America, and Asia. The company offers a range of guaranteed day- and time-definite international transportation services; day-definite services; cross-border ground package delivery; contract-only, e-commerce solutions for non-urgent, and cross-border shipments; and international service for urgent and palletized shipments. It also provides international air and ocean freight forwarding, contract logistics, customs brokerage and insurance, mail services, healthcare logistics, distribution, and post-sales services. United Parcel Service, Inc. was founded in 1907 and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Analyst Sentiment

61%
Buy

From 29 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $119.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$76

Median

$120

High Bound

$132

Average

$119

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$119.00
▲ +14.17% Upside
Low Target
$76.00
-27% Risk
Median Target
$120.00
15% Mid
High Target
$132.00
27% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC CLASS B (UPS) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

UPS operates a hub-and-route parcel network that integrates linehaul transportation, aircraft and ground fleet execution, sorting and routing operations, and a dense last-mile delivery system. Value is created by consolidating high volumes into efficient routes, using centralized planning and sorting to reduce dimensional and handling costs, and offering standardized pickup-to-delivery services for business customers. The operating model is designed to serve time-definite, multi-stop shipping needs while maintaining network reliability through coordinated capacity, workforce scheduling, and network control systems.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

UPS monetizes shipping primarily through transportation and logistics fees tied to package characteristics (weight, dimensions, speed), distance, and service level. Revenue mix is largely transactional in nature (each shipment is billed), but it is supported by repeat business and contractual commercial arrangements that create a quasi-recurring revenue profile for many shippers. Margin drivers include yield (price vs. mix), volume and network density, cost per stop (labor, fuel, benefits, maintenance), and operating leverage as fixed network costs are spread over higher throughput. Additional earnings come from logistics-related services that leverage UPS’s network capacity and customer relationships.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

UPS’s core moat is network density and cost advantage, reinforced by customer switching friction.

  • Network effects (operational, not consumer social): Higher shipment volumes improve route efficiency, reduce average cost per package through better utilization of air/ground assets, and strengthen the economics of hubs, sortation, and feeder networks.
  • Switching costs: Business customers typically integrate UPS into billing systems, warehouse pickup workflows, routing rules, service-level expectations, and customer-facing logistics processes. Switching carriers can require meaningful operational redesign, new service-level negotiations, and changes to fulfillment/transport orchestration.
  • Cost advantages: Scale in procurement, route optimization, and network planning supports a structurally lower unit cost profile versus smaller or less dense operators, especially when utilization is strong.
  • Service reliability and operational know-how: Time-definite commitments depend on dispatch execution, routing discipline, and exception management capabilities that are difficult to replicate quickly.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • FedEx competes for time-definite parcel and expedited shipments with its own air/ground network; UPS’s comparative focus emphasizes dense integration across a broad service footprint and high-throughput hub-and-route execution.
  • DHL typically emphasizes international freight/express and global cross-border services; UPS competes with strength in domestic density and integrated end-to-end parcel logistics, particularly where reliability and total cost are key.
  • Regional carriers / LTL integrators and other parcel providers can compete in specific corridors or customer segments; UPS’s advantage is the ability to coordinate a nationwide network that supports uniform service levels across lanes.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • E-commerce and parcel intensity: Sustained growth in online commerce and longer fulfillment chains increase parcel volume and service-level requirements.
  • Logistics outsourcing by mid-market and enterprise shippers: Shippers continue to externalize transportation execution to operators with scalable networks, visibility tooling, and standardized service performance.
  • Supply chain geographic rebalancing: Production and sourcing shifts can raise shipment frequency and complexity (more lanes, more time-definite requirements), supporting continued network utilization.
  • Service expansion around time-definite and specialized segments: Healthcare, technology, industrial, and business-to-business shipping often require reliable pickup/delivery windows, documented handling, and predictable routing—areas where network execution matters.
  • Productivity and automation: Incremental improvements in sortation, route planning, vehicle utilization, and labor productivity can extend unit economics even when shipment growth is moderate.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capacity and demand cyclicality: Parcel markets are sensitive to economic activity; lower volume can pressure network utilization and margins.
  • Labor and contract dynamics: Labor costs and benefit obligations are a structural component of operating expenses; wage rates and contract outcomes can affect unit costs.
  • Fuel and energy price volatility: Fuel expense can influence profitability, requiring effective pass-through mechanisms and hedging discipline.
  • Regulatory and environmental requirements: Regulations affecting emissions, fleet standards, and labor practices can increase compliance costs and alter operating strategy.
  • Competitive pricing and mix pressure: Carrier competition can compress yields and shift volumes toward less profitable service tiers.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: Fleet modernization, network expansion, and technology upgrades require disciplined capital allocation and operational execution.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value parcel networks through cash flow and operating margin characteristics, using multiples such as EV/EBITDA and a sensitivity framework tied to operating leverage. Key valuation drivers include sustainable unit costs (cost per package/stop), yield resilience (price/mix discipline), utilization and volume outlook, and the durability of free cash flow after capital expenditures and pension/benefit obligations. Because the industry exhibits cyclical demand swings, valuation dispersion often reflects perceived resilience of margins across economic environments and confidence in cost control.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

UPS’s long-term investment case rests on a structurally advantaged hub-and-route network with dense utilization, reinforced by customer switching friction and an operational capability set that is difficult to replicate. Over a multi-year horizon, growth in parcel intensity and ongoing logistics outsourcing can support volume, while productivity initiatives and network economics remain central to the durability of returns. The primary variables to monitor are utilization/yield dynamics, labor and benefit costs, and regulatory or environmental compliance impacts.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"UPS reported Q2’26 revenue of $22.834B and EPS of $1.80. Net income fell to $0.604B, down sharply from $1.283B in Q2’25 and from $0.864B in Q1’26. Revenue rose QoQ (+7.7%, from $21.202B) but declined YoY (-1.6%, from $21.221B). Net income contracted materially QoQ (-30.1%) and YoY (-52.9%). Profitability deteriorated across the quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year comparisons: operating income slipped to $0.93B (operating margin ~4.1%) versus Q1’26 (~6.0%) and was far below Q2’25 (~8.6%). The gross profit line flipped from positive in prior quarters to negative in Q2’26 (gross margin ~-14.7%), indicating cost pressures or accounting timing effects. Cash flow quality weakened versus prior quarters: operating cash flow was $0.859B and free cash flow was $0.166B, both below Q1’26 FCF ($1.193B). The company continued shareholder distributions, paying dividends of ~$1.356B; buybacks were not reflected this quarter. Balance sheet resilience remains typical for a capital-intensive logistics model: total assets were $71.3B, equity was stable around $15.1B, and leverage remains elevated with total debt ~$25.2B. Total shareholder return is supportive on momentum: the stock is up +12.99% over 1 year (not >20%). With a ~$114.33 consensus target vs. $106.44 price, upside appears modest."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue increased QoQ to $22.834B (+7.7% from $21.202B) but declined YoY to $22.834B (-1.6% from $21.221B), showing slight top-line softness.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income dropped to $0.604B (QoQ -30.1%, YoY -52.9%). Operating margin fell to ~4.1% from ~6.0% (Q1’26) and ~8.6% (Q2’25). Gross margin turned negative (~-14.7%) versus positive margins in prior quarters.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Operating cash flow was $0.859B and free cash flow was $0.166B, down versus Q1’26 FCF ($1.193B). Dividends paid were substantial (~$1.356B) with no buybacks shown this quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were $71.3B with equity around $15.1B, relatively stable. Leverage remains meaningful (total debt ~$25.2B; net debt ~$20.6B), but equity did not show deterioration.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Price momentum is positive (+12.99% 1Y; not >20%). Dividend yield is ~1.48%, but earnings decline reduces near-term confidence in payout coverage.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target is ~$114.33 vs. $106.44 current price (~7.4% upside). Valuation metrics appear mixed, and recent margin compression tempers the setup.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

UPS delivered strong margin expansion in Q2 2026 while completing its Amazon glide down and network reconfiguration. Operating margin was 9.2% (+40 bps YoY and +300 bps vs Q1), driven by U.S. Domestic execution: operating profit up 21% YoY and operating margin up 100 bps YoY to 8%, supported by revenue per piece rising 9.3% and operating leverage (revenue per piece +130 bps vs cost per piece). Management emphasized structural economics: automation penetration rose to 68.5% of U.S. volume (68.5% vs 64%), and automated buildings deliver ~28% lower cost per piece. They raised FY2026 guidance to ~$91.2B revenue, ~$8.65B operating profit, and ~$7.22 EPS. The primary near-term volatility remains fuel-driven swings, while competitive and policy risks center on Amazon enterprise aggression and de minimis timing. The strategy focus is premium mix (SMB) and data-driven network control via RFID and AI.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • RFID + AI network transformation: RFID sensing deployment across all U.S. delivery facilities and packaged cars; shifting from scanning to sensing to eliminate hundreds of millions of manual scans annually
  • Digital access and returns/packaging convenience: UPS stores RFID-enabled (every package shipped at 5,500 UPS stores is RFID-enabled) combined with Box-free label-free returns (Happy Returns) to drive premium volume
  • Health care cold chain expansion: added 27 temperature-controlled, cross-dock facilities for end-to-end control/visibility between air and ground transfers
  • SMB and premium mix capture: SMB daily volume growth of 4.3% YoY and SMB share rising to 34.5% of U.S. volume (+250 bps YoY)

Business Development

  • Amazon glide down/network reconfiguration partnership (structural reset plan executed exactly as designed; Amazon made up 9% of UPS revenue, down ~100 bps YoY)
  • Happy Returns (UPS Digital: Roadie and Happy Returns) leveraged via UPS stores returns footprint for B2B/B2C label-free returns
  • Converted a high-end jeweler from a competitor into UPS network attributed to RFID labeling at point of origin and eliminating security-guard-watching every scan

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $22.8B (+7.6% YoY). Operating profit: $2.1B (+12% YoY). Operating margin: 9.2% (+40 bps YoY; +300 bps vs Q1).
  • GAAP EPS included $891M after-tax transformation charges ($1.05/diluted share) primarily employee separation costs from recently completed Driver Choice program.
  • Diluted EPS: $1.76 (Q2).
  • U.S. Domestic: operating profit $1.2B (+21% YoY); operating margin 8% (+100 bps YoY; +400 bps vs Q1); revenue per piece +9.3% (more than half base rates + mix; remainder fuel).
  • International: revenue $5.0B (+12.5% YoY); operating profit $623M (-$59M YoY). International operating margin 12.4% including 120 bps YoY negative fuel impact.
  • Fuel volatility: conflict in the Middle East drove outsized increase in both fuel revenue and fuel costs; net operating profit dollars impact described as modest.
  • Cost and productivity: reconfigured network delivered operating leverage—revenue per piece grew 130 bps faster than cost per piece in U.S. Domestic.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash flow: $3.1B cash from operations YTD; $1.6B free cash flow YTD (includes onetime Driver Choice payments).
  • Balance sheet liquidity: $4.7B cash at end of quarter; no outstanding commercial paper.
  • Investing: capex expected about $3B for FY2026.
  • Pension: plan to complete $1.3B pension contribution in FY2026.
  • Capital return: dividends paid $2.7B YTD; planning to pay ~$5.4B in dividends in 2026 subject to Board approval.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Amazon glide down completion: eliminated ~2M pieces/day of lower-quality Amazon volume; reconfigured and further automated U.S. network; removed ~$4.5B related expense with more expected through 2026.
  • Automation penetration: automated building throughput increased to 68.5% of U.S. volume (from 64% a year ago). Automated building cost per piece is ~28% lower than non-automated.
  • Network downsizing: in first half, semi-variable costs down nearly 30,000 operational positions (Driver Choice program ~80% departures in Q2); closed 45 buildings with additional closures planned in back half.
  • RFID sensing + AI digital twin: move from scanning-based to sensing network; AI optimizes planning/routing/execution near real time using digital twin data (facilities, vehicles, aircraft, package flow).
  • Capacity flexibility: automated hubs enable faster throughput scaling and day-to-day/week-to-week capacity adjustments; automation described as equivalent to +337M more packages through automation YoY.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Raised full-year 2026 guidance: consolidated revenue ~$91.2B; consolidated operating profit ~$8.65B; diluted EPS ~$7.22.
  • Q3 2026 domestic: average daily volume expected decline mid-single digits; Q3 revenue approximately flat YoY; Q3 operating margin guided to ~7% (bracketed in transcript). Amazon glide down completed in June.
  • Back half U.S. domestic operating margin guided to ~8.8%.
  • International guidance: FY2026 operating margin expected mid-teens; Q3 operating margin between 13% and 14%, with revenue up mid-single digits.
  • Supply Chain Solutions guidance: FY2026 revenue growth high single digits; FY2026 operating margin 10% to 11%; Q3 revenue growth low double digits and operating margin 10% to 11%.
  • International comp tailwind: wrap elimination of global de minimis in September referenced as driving a large YoY comp benefit.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Fuel price volatility (Middle East conflict) causes larger swings in fuel revenue and fuel costs; management said net impact to consolidated operating profit dollars was modest but directionally adds uncertainty.
  • Volume pressure: U.S. total average daily volume down 3.3% YoY in Q2; air ADV down 2.3% (excluding Amazon air ADV +1.2%), with most ground decline attributed to Amazon glide down.
  • Competitive risk: analyst asked about Amazon more aggressive enterprise shipping; management emphasized differentiation (health care end-to-end assets, reverse logistics, RFID labeling/visibility, time-definite, special operating plans) and said it is not aware of volume lost to the cited competitor.
  • International operating margin pressure: International operating margin down year-over-year in dollars with fuel impact of -120 bps YoY included in Q2; international operating profit declined despite revenue growth.
  • De minimis/elimination timing: guidance relies on September comp benefit; trade-lane normalization (China-U.S. lane returning to YoY growth beginning in May) can shift again with policy changes.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Domestic structural margin: Management linked margin confidence to automation and network rightsizing—68.5% U.S. volume through automated buildings vs 64% a year ago, with ~28% lower cost per piece. They also highlighted removed lower-yield Amazon volume (~2M pieces/day) and reduced capacity/closures to sustain a 50–100 bps RPP/CPP spread.
  • Domestic quarter-to-quarter margin path + competition: Management attributed Q2-to-Q3 moderation to normal seasonality and the guided 50–100 bps RPP-to-CPP spread. On share dynamics, they said differentiation is “enabling capabilities,” including RFID-based origin labeling and end-to-end health care control, plus UPS store-powered reverse logistics; they were not aware of lost volume to Amazon-enterprise aggressiveness.
  • 2027 unit costs, pricing/mix, and international normalization: Management guided both RPP and CPP to decline modestly in the transition from first half to second half as pricing changes from last year are wrapped, while maintaining 50–100 bps spread. For mix, they suggested product mix benefit of ~50–100 bps. International outlook leaned on trade-lane momentum and a strong September de minimis comp.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the UPS Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) Financial Profile