Astrana Health, Inc.

Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) Market Cap

Astrana Health, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Brandon K. Sim

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Medical - Care Facilities

IPO Date: 2009-03-11

Website: https://www.astranahealth.com

Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Healthcare

Company Profile

Astrana Health, Inc., Inc., a physician-centric technology-powered healthcare management company, provides medical care services in the United States. It operates through three segments: Care Partners, Care Delivery, and Care Enablement. The company is leveraging its proprietary population health management and healthcare delivery platform, operates an integrated, value-based healthcare model which empowers the providers in its network to deliver care to its patients. It offers care coordination services to patients, families, primary care physicians, specialists, acute care hospitals, alternative sites of inpatient care, physician groups, and health plans. The company's physician network consists of primary care physicians, specialist physicians and extenders, and hospitalists. It serves patients, primarily covered by private or public insurance, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and health maintenance organization plans; and non-insured patients. The company was formerly known as Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. and changed its name to Astrana Health, Inc. in February 2024. Astrana Health, Inc. was incorporated in 1985 and is headquartered in Alhambra, California.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 11 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $44.60

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$40

Median

$45

High Bound

$50

Average

$45

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$44.60
▲ +17.40% Upside
Low Target
$40.00
5% Risk
Median Target
$45.00
18% Mid
High Target
$50.00
32% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 ASTRANA HEALTH INC (ASTH) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

ASTRANA HEALTH INC operates a healthcare services platform built around patient care delivery and supporting infrastructure across the care pathway. The value chain typically combines (1) outpatient clinical visits and physician-led services, (2) diagnostic and ancillary services that capture demand near the point of care, and (3) pharmacy-related sales and/or medication fulfillment that can be integrated into care episodes.

The economic logic is to internalize multiple steps of the patient journey: capturing patients at the front end, enabling follow-on utilization through continuity of records and care plans, and monetizing ancillary services that raise average revenue per visit. Over time, repeat utilization and referral behavior increase the stickiness of the patient base and improve asset efficiency (capacity utilization, technician/clinic utilization, and inventory/fulfillment throughput).

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue composition is driven by a mix of recurring and semi-recurring healthcare consumption:

  • Clinical services revenue: Patient visits and physician-directed care, including follow-ups for chronic and episodic conditions. This tends to be more recurring than purely elective services.
  • Diagnostics & ancillary revenue: Imaging, lab testing, and related medical services often attached to consultations. These can improve gross margin profile versus stand-alone consults due to bundling economics and operational scale.
  • Pharmacy/medication-related revenue: Medication sales and fulfillment integrated with treatment plans, adding a transactional layer that benefits from repeat care and formulary adherence.

Margin drivers typically include: (1) utilization (visits per clinician/room and throughput per lab station), (2) mix shift toward higher-value ancillary services, (3) procurement and distribution efficiency for consumables and medications, and (4) labor productivity through standardized care pathways and back-office processes. In provider models, working capital discipline (especially around inventory and payables/receivables cycles) can also influence free cash flow conversion.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ASTRANA HEALTH’s moat is best characterized as an integrated care ecosystem reinforced by regulatory barriers and operational scale. While healthcare demand is non-linear and reimbursements can fluctuate, the firm’s ability to bundle services across the care pathway supports patient retention and reduces “leakage” to independent providers.

  • Integrated ecosystem (continuity of care): Patients with established care records, physician relationships, and prior diagnostics are more likely to return for follow-ups and additional testing within the same network.
  • Regulatory and licensing barriers: Healthcare operations require approvals, credentialing, facility compliance, and quality/safety protocols. These barriers limit rapid entry and raise the cost of scaling new competitors.
  • Cost advantages via scale: Centralized procurement for consumables/medications, standardized workflows, and shared administrative infrastructure can produce unit cost benefits versus fragmented single-site operators.

Competitive benchmarking: The company primarily competes with (1) large diagnostics and testing networks such as INVITRO, (2) multi-disciplinary clinic networks like Euromed (where present regionally), and (3) independent/private clinic operators and hospital-affiliated outpatient networks.

ASTRANA HEALTH’s positioning emphasizes a care-pathway model that links consultation with diagnostics and medication-related monetization, whereas diagnostics-only operators like INVITRO typically monetize testing demand without the same depth of longitudinal clinical management. Independent clinic operators often face higher per-unit costs and greater patient leakage to separate diagnostics and pharmacy providers.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth can be supported by both demand expansion and share gains through execution:

  • Chronic disease management and repeat care: Structural need for ongoing monitoring and treatment supports recurring utilization patterns, particularly when care pathways are integrated.
  • Shift from fragmented care to coordinated provider networks: Integrated service models can improve patient convenience and reduce operational friction, supporting conversion of first-time patients into repeat users.
  • Ancillary services penetration: Embedding diagnostics and medication-related services into consultation episodes can raise revenue per patient and improve utilization of clinical and lab capacity.
  • Operational scaling and standardization: Expanding network density while maintaining quality metrics can improve throughput and unit economics, supporting sustainable compounding of profitability.
  • Regulatory modernization and quality thresholds: As compliance expectations rise, established operators with proven systems can gain relative advantage against smaller, less-resourced competitors.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and reimbursement risk: Changes in healthcare regulation, licensing requirements, reimbursement frameworks, or procurement policies can affect revenue durability and compliance costs.
  • Quality, safety, and liability risk: Healthcare delivery exposes operators to medical quality metrics, adverse event management, and legal/insurance costs.
  • Supply chain and medication pricing risk: Procurement volatility, medication availability, and pricing pressure can influence margins, especially in medication-related components.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: Network expansion requires capex for facilities, equipment, and IT/clinical systems; execution issues can dilute returns.
  • Competitive entry in specific service lines: Diagnostics-heavy competition or single-site clinic openings can pressure pricing, particularly where differentiation is weak.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value healthcare services platforms using EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, and cash flow-based multiples, with emphasis on operating leverage and cash conversion. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Utilization and throughput: Consistent volume and efficiency improvements support stable earnings quality.
  • Mix shift toward higher-value services: Greater contribution from diagnostics/ancillaries and integrated care episodes can expand margins.
  • Working capital discipline: Medication/inventory dynamics and receivable/payable cycles can affect free cash flow conversion.
  • Network density and retention: Evidence of repeat utilization and care continuity supports revenue stability.

Because provider models are sensitive to regulatory and operating assumptions, market expectations tend to move with demonstrated execution on quality, margin durability, and cash generation rather than one-off growth.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

ASTRANA HEALTH INC presents a long-term investment thesis anchored in an integrated healthcare delivery ecosystem that can create patient stickiness through care continuity while leveraging scale and regulatory barriers to limit rapid competitive entry. The primary question for sustained value creation is execution: maintaining quality and compliance, improving service mix, and converting network growth into durable operating margins and free cash flow.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"ASTH reported Q1’26 revenue of $965.1M and net income of $14.4M (EPS $0.30 / diluted $0.29). Revenue grew +1.5% QoQ (vs. $950.5M in Q4’25) and +55.6% YoY (vs. $620.4M in Q1’25). Net income rose +140.4% QoQ (vs. $6.0M in Q4’25) and +115.8% YoY (vs. $6.7M in Q1’25). Profitability improved meaningfully: operating margin expanded to 2.96% from 1.94% QoQ and from 3.32% YoY; net margin improved to 1.50% from 0.63% QoQ and 1.08% YoY. Cash generation strengthened: operating cash flow (OCF) was $68.1M in Q1’26, up from -$2.9M in Q4’25 and from $16.6M in Q1’25. Free cash flow was $64.1M (capex $4.0M), versus -$2.9M QoQ and $13.6M YoY. Balance sheet resilience is mixed but improved on liquidity: cash increased to $478.4M (from $429.5M QoQ). However, leverage remains elevated with total assets rising to $2.36B and long-term debt reported at $30.0M (while prior quarters show higher long-term debt), so interpretation depends on line-item classification consistency. Shareholder returns: with price $31.5 and 1y_change -3.67%, total return momentum is weak (no >20% 1-year boost). No dividends or buybacks are evident in the cash flow beyond small activity."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue +1.5% QoQ (950.5M to 965.1M) and +55.6% YoY (620.4M to 965.1M) indicates strong year-over-year expansion with stable sequential performance.

Profitability

Positive

Net margin improved to 1.50% from 0.63% QoQ and 1.08% YoY; operating margin expanded QoQ (1.94% to 2.96%) but remains below YoY levels (3.32%). EPS increased to 0.30 from 0.12 QoQ and 0.14 YoY.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

OCF $68.1M in Q1’26 vs. -$2.9M QoQ and $16.6M YoY; free cash flow $64.1M vs. -$2.9M QoQ and $13.6M YoY. Dividends paid (-$0.104M) appear small.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets increased to $2.36B from $2.22B QoQ; liquidity improved with cash up to $478.4M. Leverage metrics look volatile across quarters (debt lines vary), so resilience is not consistently demonstrated despite net cash improving (netDebt -$393.0M).

Shareholder Returns

Fair

1-year price change is -3.67% (no momentum tailwind). Dividend yield is negligible (~0.01%), and cash flow shows no meaningful buyback support in Q1’26.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus price target $34.2 vs. current $31.5 implies modest upside. No >20% 1-year momentum, but valuation appears not extremely stretched versus the stated multiples.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Astrana delivered a strong Q1 2026: revenue of $965.1M (+56% YoY) and adjusted EBITDA of $66.3M (+82% YoY), with adjusted EPS of $0.74 (+76% YoY). Results sat at the high end of guidance ranges, driven by disciplined organic growth plus commencement of new full-risk contracts and ongoing Prospect integration. Cost execution remains a key support—medical cost trend tracked at or above the company’s ~5.2% blended assumption, with Medicaid adverse selection lower than expected despite slightly higher-than-midpoint disenrollment and Exchange disenrollment better than expected. Operating leverage is showing through: G&A was 6.4% of revenue, down 70 bps YoY, and management attributes benefits largely to embedded agentic/AI workflows. Balance sheet momentum is material: net leverage fell to ~2.3x pro forma TTM, ahead of the deleveraging plan, alongside $64.1M free cash flow. Outlook is reaffirmed for 2026 with conservative Medicaid and zero HQAF contribution. Q&A emphasized line-of-business enrollment/trend, capital allocation under deleveraging, and how AI investment maps to near-term G&A vs longer-term MLR improvements.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Commenced new full-risk contracts during the quarter; new cohorts tracking in line with underwriting expectations
  • Prospect integration progress: completed financial standardization and aligned clinical workflows under the Astrana Care model
  • AI-embedded operational workflows driving measurable provider outcomes (24% higher gap closure; 30% higher annual wellness visit completion)
  • Operational automation from AI agents (e.g., claims adjudication and prior authorization; care management and quality outreach)

Business Development

  • Texas: launch of full-risk delegated model with a large payer partner starting January 1
  • Care Enablement segment: added a new client during the quarter (named disclosure not provided in transcript)
  • Platform scaling demonstrated via prior integrations/acquisitions referenced: Community Family Care; collaborative health systems; CFC

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $965.1M, up 56% YoY; above guidance range high end
  • Adjusted EBITDA: $66.3M, up 82% YoY; above guidance range high end
  • Non-GAAP adjusted EPS: $0.74, up 76% YoY
  • Medical cost trend: blended ~5.2% assumption; Q1 actuals in-line/better than planned across lines; trend at/above full-year range
  • G&A as % of revenue: 6.4% vs 7.1% prior-year Q1 (70 bps YoY improvement)
  • Free cash flow: $64.1M (strong operating performance and conversions to full risk)
  • Net leverage: ~2.3x pro forma TTM; down from 2.6x at year-end; based on midpoint of full-year guidance ~2.2x
  • Full-year outlook reaffirmed; assumes 0 contribution from HQAF and conservative Medicaid membership trends

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash: $478.4M at quarter end
  • Net debt: $586.8M at quarter end
  • Deleveraging ahead of timeline: moved below 2.5x net leverage milestone in 3 quarters vs 24 months initially communicated
  • Share repurchases: continued in Q1 similar to Q4 last year; amount not specified
  • No new debt amounts disclosed in transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • AI agents embedded into real-time workflows for authorizations, claims processing, care management, quality outreach, and next best actions
  • AI claims agents reduced provider payment cycle times to less than half of manually processed claims
  • Operating integration: Prospect financial standardization completed; full visibility into medical economics; aligned clinical workflows under Astrana Care model
  • Membership/risk progression: ~80% of care partners’ revenue and ~40% of owned membership in full risk arrangements at quarter end

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2026 guidance reaffirmed: Total revenue $3.8B–$4.1B; adjusted EBITDA $250M–$280M; free cash flow $105M–$132.5M
  • Q2 2026 guidance: revenue $965M–$1.0B; adjusted EBITDA $65M–$70M
  • 2027 MA rule/timing context: management discussed potential CMS encounter-based risk adjustment evolution, with analyst follow-up on technical notices potentially as soon as 2028 (company did not give a firm date)
  • Regulatory timing for HQAF contribution: expected later in 2026, likely in Q3 or Q4

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Medicaid and exchange enrollment dynamics modeled as conservative in full-year guidance (assumes conservative Medicaid membership trends) including embedded expected declines and adverse selection effects
  • Exchange attrition tracked somewhat ahead of expectations during Q1; Medicaid disenrollment tracked slightly ahead of midpoint of expected range (high end of range for year)
  • Guidance headwinds include losses associated with new cohorts and expansion markets
  • Full-year guidance assumes 0 contribution from HQAF
  • Operating model exposure to medical cost variability; company noted cost trend is currently in-line/better than planned but still relies on ~5.2% blended assumption

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Enrollment and cost trend vs expectations (Medicare, Medicaid, Exchange). Management’s response: Mid-single-digit eligibility growth in Medicare; Medicaid disenrollment tracking slightly ahead of the midpoint and expected high end for the year; Exchange disenrollments better than expected industry-wide. On trend, blended 5.2% YoY cost performed at or above full-year range across all lines; Medicaid particularly better with lower adverse selection despite higher disenrollment.
  • Topic: Capital allocation priorities given improved balance sheet (deleveraging vs cash uses like M&A/buybacks). Management’s response: Priority is deleveraging post-Prospect, already down to ~2.3x pro forma TTM ahead of the 24-month plan. Capital deployment focus is organic platform investment (AI, tech, clinical ops, expansion). M&A considered only for capital-efficient density; repo is evaluated dynamically based on risk-adjusted returns and shareholder value.
  • Topic: 2027 outlook credibility plus AI investment allocation and quantified margin drivers. Management’s response: 2027 target framework provided in 2024; management emphasized durability across regulatory cycles and cited 2019–2026 CAGR performance (revenue ~32%, adj. EBITDA ~25%). On AI/G&A, management said 70 bps YoY is “meaningfully” AI-influenced but did not quantify dollar impact; AI mix skewed toward administrative and payer/G&A efficiencies first, with clinical/care-management tools improving MLR over time.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ASTH Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH) Financial Profile