C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) Market Cap

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: David Bozeman

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Integrated Freight & Logistics

IPO Date: 1997-10-16

Website: https://www.chrobinson.com

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides freight transportation services and logistics solutions to companies in various industries worldwide. The company operates in two segments, North American Surface Transportation and Global Forwarding. It offers transportation and logistics services, such as truckload; less than truckload transportation brokerage services, which include the shipment of single or multiple pallets of freight; intermodal transportation that comprise the shipment service of freight in containers or trailers by a combination of truck and rail; and non-vessel ocean common carrier and freight forwarding services, as well as organizes air shipments and provides door-to-door services. The company also offers customs broker services; and other logistics services, such as fee-based managed, warehousing, small parcel, and other services. It has contractual relationships with approximately 85,000 transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, and air and ocean carriers. In addition, the company is involved in buying, selling, and/or marketing of fresh produce, including fresh fruits, vegetables, and other value-added perishable items under the Robinson Fresh name. Further, it provides transportation management services or managed TMS; and other surface transportation services. The company offers its fresh produce to grocery retailers, restaurants, produce wholesalers, and foodservice distributors through a network of independent produce growers and suppliers. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. was founded in 1905 and is headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota.

Analyst Sentiment

72%
Strong Buy

From 24 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $192.24

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$90

Median

$202

High Bound

$230

Average

$192

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$192.24
▲ +4.43% Upside
Low Target
$90.00
-51% Risk
Median Target
$202.00
10% Mid
High Target
$230.00
25% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC (CHRW) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

CH Robinson operates as a freight transportation and logistics intermediary, connecting shippers that need to move goods with a large network of motor carriers and other transportation providers. The value chain is centered on demand–capacity matching, route and mode optimization, and ongoing transportation execution support.

The company’s operating model is predominantly asset-light: it does not own the underlying transportation equipment at scale. Instead, it earns revenue for brokerage and logistics services by orchestrating shipments, providing transportation management, and leveraging proprietary workflow and data to improve match quality and operational outcomes for customers.

Customer stickiness is driven by operational integration (processes, reporting, exception handling), the proven reliability of capacity sourcing during tight freight conditions, and the administrative burden removed from shippers who otherwise would need to manage carrier sourcing, tendering, and performance oversight load-by-load.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

CH Robinson monetizes primarily through transaction-based brokerage (earnings per shipment/load and related services) and logistics services that include transportation management and managed services. Revenue is supplemented by value-added offerings tied to execution and risk management.

Margin drivers typically include:

  • Rate structure and spread capture: returns are linked to the differential between what shippers pay and what carriers are paid, plus service fees.
  • Mix shift toward managed services: higher service content tends to support more durable pricing and customer retention than pure pass-through brokerage.
  • Operational efficiency: scale in tendering, tracking, and claims/exception management reduces cost-to-serve.
  • Technology enablement: improved matching and automation lower friction and can enhance throughput per employee and per operating platform cost.

While revenue is exposed to freight demand cycles, the business is designed to translate volume into cash generation through operating leverage and disciplined cost management, with incremental earnings supported by network utilization.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

CH Robinson’s positioning is supported by hard-to-replicate advantages that reinforce each other:

  • Switching costs (operational integration): shippers embed CH Robinson into procurement and transportation workflows. Changing providers requires retooling processes, rebuilding performance history, and re-establishing lane/carrier strategies.
  • Network effects (capacity sourcing marketplace dynamics): a large carrier network and frequent load matching improve match quality. Over time, the platform accumulates operational intelligence that benefits execution outcomes for both sides of the network.
  • Cost advantages via scale and information: procurement of capacity at scale, standardized execution, and centralized operational oversight reduce average cost-to-serve versus smaller brokers and many in-house logistics operations.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • J.B. Hunt Transport Services and Schneider: both compete through integrated transportation capabilities and carrier assets/services across truckload and intermodal. Their model places more emphasis on owned or controlled capacity, while CH Robinson emphasizes asset-light brokerage and logistics orchestration.
  • Hub Group and XPO: these players also offer logistics and transportation services with varying degrees of asset ownership and managed capacity strategies. CH Robinson’s differentiation centers on broad broker-based load matching and ongoing transportation management rather than primarily scaling through proprietary equipment fleets.

Across these rivals, CH Robinson’s industry focus leans toward broad-based brokerage and logistics management—where the key constraint is not equipment ownership, but reliable capacity access, execution quality, and information advantage in matching supply with demand under variable market conditions.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, CH Robinson’s opportunity set is anchored to structural trends in freight and supply chain operations:

  • Ongoing outsourcing of transportation execution: shippers continue to seek partners that can manage complexity in carrier sourcing, compliance, tracking, and performance reporting rather than building internal capability at the lane level.
  • Supply chain volatility and demand for resiliency: irregular demand, regional production shifts, and regulatory complexity increase the value of brokers that can rapidly source capacity and adjust execution strategies.
  • Mode optimization and intermodal growth: transportation networks increasingly favor efficient mode selection and routing. Logistics orchestration can capture value by steering shipments to best-fit modes.
  • Digitization of freight procurement: technology-enabled tendering, visibility, and exception handling support stronger customer outcomes and can increase share-of-wallet within shipper accounts.
  • Share gains from smaller brokers and fragmented capacity: scale advantages and platform depth can win incremental freight as customers prefer fewer, more capable partners.

The TAM is driven less by overall freight tonnage alone and more by how much of the logistics process is purchased as a service—especially the portion involving planning, exception management, and continuous execution across a shipper’s network.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Freight-cycle and spread compression: as truckload and logistics markets swing, brokerage margins can compress even if volumes remain strong.
  • Carrier capacity and service-level risk: reliance on third-party carriers can introduce variability in on-time performance, claims, and operational disruptions.
  • Credit and payment risk: exposure exists through transaction settlement dynamics and any working-capital-related fluctuations, particularly during market stress.
  • Regulatory and compliance changes: evolving freight and transportation regulations (including safety, reporting, and insurance/claims frameworks) can increase compliance costs or modify industry economics.
  • Disintermediation by digital networks: technology platforms may attempt to reduce the brokerage role. CH Robinson’s defense depends on maintaining superior execution quality, reliability, and account-level service depth.
  • Reputational and claims exposure: operational failures or disputes can affect customer relationships and increase loss-related expenses.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Market valuation for brokerage-leaning logistics firms often reflects the balance between (1) cyclicality of transaction volumes and (2) underlying service stickiness and scalability. Investors commonly emphasize:

  • EV/EBITDA or EV/EBIT for operating leverage and margin structure, adjusted for cycle conditions.
  • P/S (price-to-sales) when revenue quality and recurring-like service content are emphasized, since revenue is closely tied to load flows.
  • Return on invested capital (ROIC) as a check on whether working capital intensity and credit/claims risk are contained.

Key valuation drivers typically include durable mix toward higher service content, evidence of stable operating discipline through freight cycles, and sustained customer retention supported by switching costs and execution performance.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

CH Robinson is positioned as a scaled, asset-light transportation orchestrator with defensible moats rooted in operational switching costs, network-driven capacity matching, and scale-based cost advantages. The investment case is supported by structural outsourcing of logistics execution and the increasing need for resilient, technology-enabled freight management—offset by inherent freight-cycle and third-party service risks that require ongoing monitoring.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"CHRW reported Q1 2026 revenue of $4.01B (+2.0% QoQ, +0.65% YoY) and net income of $147.2M (+8.0% QoQ, +8.84% YoY). EPS was $1.23 (up from $1.14 in Q4’25 and $1.12 in Q1’25). Profitability was modestly stronger: net margin improved sequentially to 3.67% (from 3.48% in Q4’25) and expanded vs. Q1’25 (3.34%). Operating income margin also improved QoQ (4.38% vs. 4.64% in Q4’25; and vs. 4.37% in Q1’25), indicating better bottom-line conversion despite some quarter-to-quarter operating volatility. Cash generation remained solid. Operating cash flow was $68.6M in the quarter, but free cash flow was $66.0M—lower than Q4’25 due to weaker working-capital contribution (Q4’25 had unusually strong operating cash flow). Balance sheet resilience looks stable: total assets rose to $5.24B QoQ, and equity was $1.70B. Leverage remained manageable with total debt of ~$1.64B and net debt of ~$1.48B, though net debt is still sizable. Shareholder returns appear strong: the stock is up +102.8% over the last year, and the dividend yield is low (~0.4%). Given the high 1-year momentum, total shareholder return momentum likely provides a meaningful support to the overall score."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue was $4.01B in Q1’26, up +2.0% QoQ (+0.65% YoY). Growth is positive but relatively modest, suggesting steady demand rather than acceleration.

Profitability

Good

Net income grew +8.0% QoQ and +8.84% YoY. Net margin improved vs. Q1’25 (3.34% to 3.67%) and sequentially vs. Q4’25 (3.48% to 3.67%), indicating better cost control/bottom-line conversion.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

FCF was $66.0M in Q1’26. OCF ($68.6M) is lower than Q4’25 ($305.4M), likely reflecting weaker working capital timing; nonetheless, cash generation remains positive and supports ongoing capital returns.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Total assets increased to $5.24B QoQ and equity rose to $1.70B. Leverage remains moderate but net debt is still high (~$1.48B). Overall balance sheet posture looks resilient.

Shareholder Returns

Excellent

Strong capital appreciation: +102.8% 1-year price change. Dividend yield is small (~0.4%), but continued buybacks (e.g., repurchases of $212.7M in Q1’26) likely enhance total return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus price target ($184.65) is below the current context price ($182.24) is roughly aligned to slightly below; however, the stock’s very large 1-year run implies sentiment/expectations are already high, limiting upside confidence despite solid fundamentals.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

CHRW delivered another quarter of secular earnings growth despite supply-driven trucking tightening and elevated spot costs. Adjusted EPS rose 15% YoY while Q1 NASS gross margin held at 14.6% amid ex-fuel dry van spot costs up ~19% YoY. Management attributed resilience to Lean AI-enabled cost-to-serve improvements, repricing discipline, targeted contractual volume capture (contract mix ~65% to ~70% YoY), and opportunistic transactional volume capture as tender rejection rose. Operating leverage was clear: operating margin (ex restructuring) +210 bps and NAST +310 bps YoY. The main quantitative headwind was fuel-surcharge pressure—>50 bps sequential gross margin percentage impact in March—along with a ~12% YoY revenue/AGP decline tied largely to Global Forwarding ocean weakness. Outlook is constructive: dry van spot rates guided to +17% YoY for full year and Q2 seasonality points to +4.5% sequential volume. Capital returns were aggressive: ~$360M in Q1 repurchases/dividends with ~$1.24B liquidity.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Capturing transactional volumes at higher margins as tender rejection rates increased; maintained NASS gross margin at 14.6% despite sharply higher truckload spot costs (ex fuel +19% YoY).
  • Mix shift toward contractual truckload volume (approx. 65% to 70% YoY) supported by improved win rate and targeted vertical focus (retail and automotive) plus expanded capabilities (drop trailer, cross-border, short-haul).
  • Global Forwarding gross margin expansion of +60 bps YoY as teams helped customers comply with changing customs regulations while applying NAST-style revenue management discipline.

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Adjusted EPS increased 15% YoY despite a significant rise in truckload spot market costs.
    • Total revenue and AGP declined ~12% YoY in Q1; AGP decline driven mainly by Global Forwarding (down 12% YoY) due to lower adjusted gross profit per transaction and lower ocean volumes.
    • Operating margin (excluding restructuring) expanded +210 bps YoY; NAST operating margin (excluding restructuring) expanded +310 bps YoY.
    • Fuel surcharge impact: increase in fuel surcharges from Feb to Mar reduced truckload gross margin in March by over 50 bps sequentially (no gross profit dollars impact; margin percentage pressure could persist into Q2).
    • Effective tax rate: 11.7% in Q1; full-year tax rate expected 18%–20%.
    • Operating margin target: reaffirmed 2026 operating income target previously raised in October (no numeric restatement in transcript).

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Shareholder return: returned approximately $360 million in Q1 (includes $280.7 million share repurchases and $79 million dividends).
    • Balance sheet: ended Q1 with ~$1.24 billion liquidity; net debt/EBITDA increased to 1.32x from 1.03x at end of Q4 due to higher share repurchases.
    • Capex: $15 million in Q1; full-year capex expected $75 million–$85 million.

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Lean AI strategy emphasizing where it delivers measurable P&L outcomes; disciplined AI deployment prioritized by ROI with instrumentation and human-in-the-loop oversight.
    • Automation focus across quote-to-cash workflow; management stated only a fraction of hundreds of processes are automated and significant runway remains.
    • Operational model: implemented new lean operating model to optimize adjusted gross profit per shipment and maintain NAST gross margin percentage amid elevated capacity costs.
    • Cost/hire advantage and productivity: since 2022, NAST shipments per person per day up >50%; Q1 maintained double-digit productivity improvements in NASS.

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Q2 seasonality: ten-year CAS Freight Shipment Index average (excluding 2020) implies ~4.5% sequential volume increase in Q2.
    • Truckload spot outlook: dry van spot rates expected +17% YoY for full year, up from +8% stated three months earlier; spot rates expected to remain elevated.

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Fuel cost volatility: rising fuel surcharges have already pressured truckload gross margin percentage by >50 bps sequentially (Feb to Mar); risk of continued pressure into Q2.
    • Spot-market tightness driven by supply constraints (CDL/enforcement actions and winter storms) contributed to higher spot costs and higher tender rejection rates; while monetized, it increases execution complexity.
    • Global forwarding macro disruption: ocean rates declined vs elevated prior-year levels due to excess vessel capacity; AGP pressured by lower ocean volumes.

    Q&A: Analyst Interest

    • Montgomery case/safety ruling impact: Management said they expect to win the Montgomery case, framing it as safety (not broker immunity). If the ruling is unfavorable, management stated the industry faces increased multi-state broker complexity; CHRW will execute its playbook either way.
    • Rate environment and repricing mechanics: Management highlighted faster, more accurate and more specific repricing through Q4/Q1, including repricing “with customers” to keep supply chains healthy. Management reported strong bid activity after major RFP periods and expects similar repricing discipline into Q2 if needed.

    Sentiment: POSITIVE

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the CHRW Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    © 2026 Stock Market Info — C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) Financial Profile