Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.

Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) Market Cap

Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: John Kedzierski

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Security & Protection Services

IPO Date: 2020-09-22

Website: https://evolv.com

Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. develops, manufactures, markets, and sells security screening products and specific services in the United States and internationally. It offers Evolv Express, that is designed to detect firearms, improvised explosive devices, and large tactical knives in unstructured people flows; Evolv eXpedite, an autonomous AI-based weapon detection system for bags being brought to venues by visitors in high clutter environments; and Evolv Insights Analytics Application which provides self-serve access, insights regarding visitor flow and arrival curves, location specific performance, system detection performance and alarm statistics, and comparisons across multiple business dimensions. The company serves various industries comprising education, healthcare, professional sports, notable performing arts and entertainment venues, major tourist destinations and cultural attractions, government and corporate offices, hospitality facilities, distribution facilities, large industrial workplaces, and houses of worship. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $10.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$10

Median

$10

High Bound

$10

Average

$10

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$10.00
▲ +80.83% Upside
Low Target
$10.00
81% Risk
Median Target
$10.00
81% Mid
High Target
$10.00
81% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 EVOLV TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS INC CL (EVLV) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

EVOLV operates in automated security screening for checkpoints (e.g., airports, venues, and other high-throughput facilities). The system combines hardware (computer vision sensors and on-site processing infrastructure) with software that performs threat detection and verification. In practice, EVOLV sells and deploys screening solutions that reduce reliance on traditional, labor-intensive processes by improving throughput and improving the accuracy of screening signals for staff.

A key feature of the value chain is that installations are not “one-and-done.” Customers must integrate screening workflows into existing checkpoint operations, train staff, and maintain operational performance. This creates ongoing demand for support, upgrades, and software services after deployment.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is typically driven by a combination of:

  • Technology and system sales (transactional): hardware deployments and configuration tied to customer procurement cycles.
  • Software and subscription-like services (recurring): software enablement, feature upgrades, and ongoing operational support that improve total lifetime value per installed site.
  • Services and maintenance (recurring/semirecurring): maintenance, customer support, and performance-related servicing.

Margin structure generally improves as the mix shifts toward recurring software/services, because the marginal cost of delivering software updates and support is typically lower than delivering new hardware systems. For EVOLV, the principal operating leverage is therefore tied to installed base expansion and retention/upgrade rates across deployments.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

EVOLV’s moat is best characterized as data/algorithmic switching costs plus workflow integration rather than manufacturing scale.

  • High switching costs (workflow + operational dependence): Checkpoint operations require consistent detection performance, user training, and integration into security procedures. Replacing a working screening system introduces operational disruption and validation overhead.
  • Intangible assets (computer vision models): Threat detection in complex lighting and crowd environments depends on proprietary detection approaches and continuous model improvement. These assets accumulate over deployments and training cycles.
  • Operational performance as an adoption lever: In security screening, throughput and false positives materially affect staffing and passenger/guest experience. Systems that meet operational thresholds can become preferred within a site.

Competitive benchmarking: EVOLV competes with established security screening suppliers and integrated checkpoint systems, including:

  • Rapiscan Systems (Smiths Detection ecosystem) — large installed base in traditional and next-generation screening solutions.
  • OSI Systems / OSI Security — imaging and screening technologies used across airports and government sites.
  • Smiths Detection (broader portfolio) — comprehensive detection and screening equipment.

EVOLV’s positioning emphasizes AI-driven automated threat detection in a checkpoint workflow, while many larger competitors often anchor on imaging-based or established hardware-centric architectures with broader product catalogs. The contest is therefore partly about technology effectiveness and partly about procurement and installed-base dynamics.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, EVOLV’s addressable market should be supported by several structural trends:

  • Checkpoint modernization: High-throughput facilities continue to upgrade security systems to improve detection outcomes and reduce operational friction.
  • Labor efficiency pressure: Screening labor constraints and cost pressures favor solutions that can improve throughput and reduce manual intervention.
  • Rising security and compliance expectations: Threat environments and compliance regimes support sustained investment in detection capability.
  • Scalability within installed bases: Once a site adopts AI-enabled screening, expansion across additional gates/lanes and new facilities can follow through procurement relationships.
  • Expansion beyond airports: Venues, transit-adjacent environments, and other high-volume locations broaden TAM beyond a single customer type.

These drivers matter because EVOLV’s model benefits from both new deployment volume (hardware/system sales) and recurring value extraction (software/services tied to the installed base).

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Procurement and adoption friction: Security systems face long sales cycles, extensive validation, and contract-specific requirements. Delays can affect near-term conversion and visibility into installed base growth.
  • Technological performance risk: Detection accuracy in diverse environments is critical. Performance shortfalls could slow deployments and raise costs associated with remediations or customer re-training.
  • Competition from entrenched suppliers: Large incumbents may leverage installed bases, procurement relationships, and broader equipment portfolios to defend share.
  • Regulatory, privacy, and data governance constraints: Computer vision systems can face scrutiny regarding data handling, retention, and compliance with applicable rules.
  • Capital intensity of deployments: While EVOLV is not a heavy industrial manufacturer, deployments still require installation, integration, and customer-specific engineering that can pressure cash generation if scaled faster than service capacity.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value automated security and technology-enabled infrastructure businesses using P/S and EV/Revenue during periods when operating margins are still forming, and then transition toward EV/EBITDA as recurring revenue mix and unit economics become clearer.

Key valuation drivers for EVOLV-type models include:

  • Recurring revenue share: a higher proportion of software/services generally supports a re-rating due to better visibility.
  • Gross margin trajectory: improving mix and scaling effects reduce dependence on one-time hardware gross profit.
  • Installed base monetization: expansion of recurring per-site revenue (upgrades, support, software features) is central to long-term value creation.
  • Customer retention and expansion: durable performance that supports repeat deployments across lanes/facilities tends to underpin stronger long-run expectations.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

EVOLV presents a long-term thesis around AI-enabled checkpoint screening, where adoption can become sticky due to operational workflow integration and accumulated algorithmic capability. The investment case strengthens if the installed base reliably converts into recurring software/services and if the company demonstrates sustained detection performance across diverse environments. The primary debate is execution—commercial conversion through validation cycles and the ability to defend against well-capitalized security incumbents—while the structural tailwinds center on checkpoint modernization, labor efficiency, and persistent security demand.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"EVLV reported Q1’26 revenue of $46.3M, up +20.1% QoQ (+13.4% YoY vs. Q1’25 $32.0M). Net income swung to a loss of -$5.0M (EPS -$0.03) from profit in Q4’25 (+$10.9M) and from a smaller loss in Q1’25 (-$1.7M), i.e., net income deteriorated -195.0% QoQ and -196.6% YoY. Gross margin declined to 50.9% from 48.4% QoQ (expanding), but operating margin remained weak at -18.3%, reflecting higher operating cost intensity. On cash flow, Q1’26 operating cash flow was -$3.2M and free cash flow was -$6.9M, consistent with continued negative earnings-to-cash conversion. Cash and short-term investments increased to ~$61.1M, improving balance-sheet resilience despite losses; total assets were steady at ~$304.6M. Leverage is moderate for a non-bank, with net cash (net debt -$14.1M). Total shareholder returns look strong: the stock is up +93.4% over 1 year, which materially offsets fundamentals risk (no dividend and no buybacks reported in the quarter). Analyst valuation appears stretched versus profitability (price/earnings negative), with a $10 consensus fair value above the $6.48 price, implying upside if losses narrow."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue rose +20.1% QoQ (to $46.3M) and +13.4% YoY vs Q1’25 ($32.0M), indicating top-line momentum.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income declined to -$5.0M (EPS -$0.03) from +$10.9M in Q4’25 and -$1.7M in Q1’25. Operating margin remained deeply negative (-18.3%) despite gross margin expansion to 50.9%.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$3.2M and free cash flow -$6.9M in Q1’26, worsening from Q4’25’s positive OCF and FCF.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Cash and short-term investments increased to ~$61.1M; net debt is negative (net cash). Total assets were stable around ~$304M and equity increased slightly QoQ.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong market momentum: +93.4% 1-year price change. No dividends/buybacks reported, so returns are primarily price-driven.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus fair value ($10) is above the current price ($6.48), but valuation metrics are distorted by losses (negative EPS/earnings).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

EVLV exited Q1 2026 with strong top-line momentum and expanding recurring economics, while acknowledging near-term gross margin pressure from a deliberate shift to direct fulfillment purchase subscriptions. Revenue grew 45% YoY to $46.3M and ARR rose 20% YoY to $127.3M. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 8.5% (+210 bps YoY), helped by scale and operating discipline, even as adjusted gross margin fell to 52% (-900 bps YoY) due to upfront hardware recognition. RPO increased 18% YoY to $299M, supported by upgrades to Gen 2 Express and continued end-market demand. Management raised 2026 revenue guidance to $175M-$180M (+20%-23% YoY) and expects ARR of ~$145M-$150M (+20%-25%). They expect a sequential Q2 revenue decline driven by backlog shipment timing rather than demand softness. Operationally, the Plexus manufacturing partnership is progressing toward completion by quarter end, with semiconductor risks described as largely mitigated.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Weapon screening as a hardware-enabled subscription platform expanding installed base and multiyear subscription contracts
  • Gen 2 Express upgrades driving remaining performance obligation growth and stronger upgrade/renewal motion
  • Expedite autonomous AI bag screening traction and lower-alert outcomes enabling bundled walk-through + bag workflows
  • Education and enterprise adoption supporting scalability and reliability demand

Business Development

  • Plexus as new global contract manufacturing partner (onboarding progressing; expected completion by end of quarter)
  • Customer wins named: BronxCare Health System; West Virginia University Health System
  • Education/customer geography examples: K-12 districts and municipalities across Arkansas, California, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas
  • Professional sports coverage: Evolv weapon screening partner for 50% of playoff teams across professional basketball and hockey
  • Enterprise footprint: more than 30 Fortune 500 companies (specific Fortune 500 names not provided in transcript)
  • Notable venue: Subaru Park (professional soccer stadium); additional named: major multi-use Western U.S. arena (basketball/hockey) and a major professional football franchise (franchise not named)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $46.3M (+45% YoY), above high end of prior guidance referenced by management
  • ARR: $127.3M (+20% YoY)
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin: 8.5% vs 6.4% prior year = +210 bps
  • Adjusted gross margin: 52% vs 61% prior year = -900 bps, attributed to intentional shift to direct fulfillment purchase subscriptions
  • RPO: $299M (+18% YoY)
  • Guidance drivers: higher mix of purchase subscriptions, incremental short-term rental subscriptions, and continued strength in pricing/ARPU trends
  • Revenue timing dynamics: expected sequential Q2 decline due to shipment timing of purchase-subscription backlog from Q1

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash, cash equivalents & marketable securities decreased by about $8M sequentially to $61M (timing of annual incentive payments associated with strong 2025 performance)
  • Management expects to be cash flow positive in 2H 2026
  • No buyback or incremental debt activity mentioned in transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Direct fulfillment transition for purchase subscriptions (onetime year-over-year product revenue benefit in Q1; lower near-term gross margin but improved long-term economics/cash flow)
  • Upgrade cycle: customers moving to Gen 2 Express supporting RPO growth and recurring revenue visibility
  • Operational scale investments: upgrading core back-office systems, strengthening process/control, tightening key operating processes; hiring/bench build across AI/algorithms, product management, services, and IT
  • Plexus contract manufacturing onboarding planned to complete by end of Q1

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Investor Day 2026 scheduled for June 9, 2026
  • 2026 revenue guidance raised to $175M-$180M (from $172M-$178M), representing ~20%-23% YoY growth
  • 2026 ARR guidance: ~$145M-$150M (from commentary; implies ~20%-25% YoY growth)
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin outlook: full-year 2026 high single digits vs 7.6% in 2025; expects expanded adjusted EBITDA margins in 2026
  • Gross margin outlook: Q2 and balance of 2026 closer to mid-50s adjusted gross margin (mix-dependent)
  • Revenue profile expectations: sequential Q2 revenue decline; H2 total revenue modestly higher than H1; H2 ARR growth outpacing revenue growth

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Semiconductor supply constraints across the industry—management states EVLV mitigated largely and expects to maintain near-term delivery plans
  • Gross margin headwind from purchase subscription direct fulfillment (Q1 gross margin down 900 bps YoY; mix-driven)
  • Revenue timing risk: sequential Q2 decline due to backlog mix/shipment timing (not end-market weakness)
  • Competitive/technology substitutability risk: competitors exist in X-ray bag scanning market; management claims differentiation via proprietary autonomous AI, integration, and cloud workflow
  • Policy/legislative uncertainty: example cited Georgia House Bill 1023 (monitoring; no assumption of outcome)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Purchase vs subscription contract mix and expected trajectory. Management said Q1 mix was ~60/40 vs typical 50/50, and that full-year guidance expects ~55% purchase/45% subscription. For ARR allocation, management explained that full subscription deal value is in ARR, while purchase deals split upfront product revenue plus recurring services value.
  • Topic: Gross margin expectations given direct fulfillment and purchase mix. Management (Chris) stated Q1 adjusted gross margin was 52% and guided toward closer to the mid-50s for the rest of the year, emphasizing mix sensitivity. They tied improved margins to COGS spreading over longer subscription useful life versus purchase hardware recognized upfront.
  • Topic: Expedite differentiation, alert-rate performance, and sales-cycle implications. Management described competitors offering X-ray bag products in a mature market, but argued Expedite’s autonomous AI removes human review, enabling higher conveyor speed and unified operator/cloud workflow. They also suggested lower alert burden can reduce customer operational overhead and potentially shorten cycles, while noting they often sell two units per cycle to reduce CAC.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the EVLV Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) Financial Profile