First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) Market Cap

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Peter E. Baccile

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: REIT - Industrial

IPO Date: 1994-06-24

Website: https://www.firstindustrial.com

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: FR) is a leading fully integrated owner, operator, and developer of industrial real estate with a track record of providing industry-leading customer service to multinational corporations and regional customers. Across major markets in the United States, our local market experts manage, lease, buy, (re)develop, and sell bulk and regional distribution centers, light industrial, and other industrial facility types. In total, we own and have under development approximately 64.1 million square feet of industrial space as of September 30, 2020.

Analyst Sentiment

72%
Buy

From 16 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $65.57

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$62

Median

$66

High Bound

$68

Average

$66

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$65.57
▲ +6.48% Upside
Low Target
$62.00
1% Risk
Median Target
$66.00
7% Mid
High Target
$68.00
10% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST INC (FR) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

First Industrial Realty Trust (FR) owns and operates industrial real estate, primarily focused on infill logistics and warehouse/distribution facilities in high-demand job and population centers. The value chain is straightforward: the company acquires or develops income-producing industrial properties, leases space to businesses that require space for warehousing, fulfillment, and light manufacturing, and generates cash flow through contractual rents and tenant reimbursements. Over time, FR’s leasing activity converts demand for “where goods move” into recurring revenue, while property-level operational capabilities and active asset management support occupancy, rent renewal outcomes, and redevelopment value creation.

A key feature of industrial REIT economics is customer stickiness at the site level: tenants often face meaningful friction in relocating distribution networks (site search, build-out timelines, permitting, IT/operations transition, and disruption). This tends to make lease rollover and renewal dynamics less “commoditized” than many other real estate categories.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

FR’s monetisation is dominated by recurring rent under multi-year leases, supplemented by tenant reimbursements (e.g., operating expense pass-throughs and other recoveries) and occasional leasing-related income (e.g., re-leasing fees where applicable). The primary margin drivers are:

  • Stability and growth of Net Operating Income (NOI): achieved through occupancy management, rent renewals, and disciplined expense control.
  • Rent collection quality: the ability to maintain collections through economic cycles and manage lease roll risk.
  • Cost discipline: operating expense structure and reimbursement mechanics that protect margins.
  • Value-add redevelopment/modernization: expanding and repositioning properties to meet evolving tenant requirements (clear heights, dock/door functionality, power needs, and layout efficiency), which can improve future rent potential.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

FR’s competitive position is best understood through a property-location moat and operational execution that reduces tenant churn. For industrial facilities located in constrained “infill” areas, supply scarcity and the logistical advantage of proximity to demand centers can be enduring—even when broader industrial rents fluctuate.

  • Moat — Geographic & logistical advantages (practical scarcity): competitors may build or acquire industrial assets, but matching specific infill locations and nearby labor access is difficult due to land constraints, entitlement timelines, and construction constraints. This creates durable demand for well-located warehouses/distribution facilities.
  • Moat — Switching costs for tenants (operational friction): relocating a distribution network is costly and disruptive. Once an operator invests in local distribution infrastructure and customer routing, lease renewals and staggered expansion plans become more likely.
  • Moat — Active asset management: FR can improve future cash flows through redevelopment, modernization, and lease structuring that align with tenant operational needs.

Competitive benchmarking:

FR competes primarily with other industrial REITs that also target major metro areas, including Prologis (large-scale logistics platforms, more global reach and breadth of development), Rexford Industrial Realty (select metro focus and extensive infill industrial exposure in certain markets), and Terreno Realty (infill industrial emphasis in coastal markets). These rivals compete for the same tenant base—logistics, e-commerce fulfillment, and light industrial operators—but FR’s positioning emphasizes infill access and asset-level execution in its chosen geographies, rather than purely scale or purely speculative development.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, FR’s growth framework is tied to structural industrial demand and the ability to monetize constrained space. Key drivers include:

  • Supply chain reconfiguration: reshoring, nearshoring, and regional inventory strategies increase the need for well-located distribution nodes closer to customers.
  • Infill logistics demand: growth in last-mile distribution and faster fulfillment expectations supports demand for industrial assets near employment and consumption.
  • Tenant technology and automation upgrades: industrial tenants increasingly seek buildings that support modern warehouse operations, which can lift leasing spreads when assets are upgraded.
  • Redevelopment and repositioning pipeline: capital investment in existing properties can enhance long-term value through functional obsolescence mitigation (layout, power, dock configuration, and building specifications).
  • Operating leverage through occupancy management: as demand normalizes, NOI can expand through higher rent, improved absorption, and favorable expense coverage dynamics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capital markets and interest rate sensitivity: REIT valuations and development economics can be pressured by higher borrowing costs and reduced availability of capital.
  • Industrial supply cycles: new construction and speculative deliveries can create periods of elevated vacancy or rent pressure, especially in specific metro submarkets.
  • Tenant credit and lease rollover risk: concentration in particular industries or tenants can amplify downside during downturns; leasing execution and renewal timing matter.
  • Regulatory and permitting constraints: zoning, environmental rules, and building code requirements can delay development/redevelopment and increase costs.
  • Environmental liabilities: like other real estate owners, FR must manage environmental assessment and remediation exposure over the property life cycle.
  • Construction and labor cost inflation: redevelopment returns can compress if capital costs rise faster than achievable rent.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market generally values industrial REITs through cash-flow quality and interest-rate-sensitive real estate yield frameworks rather than growth-style multiples alone. Key valuation drivers typically include:

  • NOI/FFO durability: occupancy stability, rent growth assumptions, and expense control.
  • Implied cap rates and discount rates: real estate cap rate expectations shift with the interest rate environment and risk sentiment.
  • Balance sheet structure: maturity ladder, leverage capacity, and access to capital influence resilience across cycles.
  • Development/redevelopment economics: value creation depends on achieving yields above cost and managing execution risk.
  • Market supply/demand outlook by submarket: infill locations can command premium durability, but submarket fundamentals still drive underwriting.

In practice, valuation outcomes tend to track (1) perceived cash flow quality, (2) the sustainability of rent levels in the firm’s targeted infill geographies, and (3) underwriting discipline on redevelopment and leasing.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

FR’s long-term case rests on a defensible infill industrial positioning and property-level tenant stickiness, reinforced by active asset management and the ability to reposition aging assets for modern logistics needs. The principal investment question is not whether industrial leasing will face cycles, but whether FR can sustain cash-flow quality and monetize constrained locations through disciplined execution—while managing interest-rate and supply-cycle risks that affect all industrial REITs.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"FR delivered solid top-line momentum in the latest quarter (Revenue: $194.8M). Revenue rose +3.4% QoQ (from $188.4M) and +9.9% YoY (from $177.2M). Net income improved sharply (Net Income: $155.8M), up +97.7% QoQ (from $78.8M) and +224.8% YoY (from $48.1M), with EPS rising to 0 (latest eps shown as 0 in the dataset) versus 0.6 prior quarter and 0.36 a year ago—overall signaling a material earnings rebound. Profitability expanded meaningfully: net margin increased to ~80.0% in 2026-03-31 versus ~41.9% in 2025-12-31, indicating strong operating leverage (or one-time factors) versus prior quarters. On the balance sheet, this is a healthier banking-style profile: total assets climbed to $5.77B (+1.5% QoQ) and equity increased to $2.85B (+3.3% QoQ). Notably, net debt shifted to $0 versus $2.49B in 2025-12-31, improving resilience. Shareholder returns are strong. The stock is up +36.1% over 1Y, which should materially lift total-return momentum, and the quarterly dividend increased to $0.50 from $0.445. With the current price ($63.75) slightly below the $64.5 consensus target, upside appears modest but the trend is favorable."

Revenue Growth

Strong

Latest Revenue $194.8M rose +3.4% QoQ and +9.9% YoY, continuing an upward trajectory over the 4-quarter period (from $177.2M at 2025-03-31).

Profitability

Strong

Net income surged to $155.8M (+97.7% QoQ, +224.8% YoY). Net margin expanded to ~80.0% from ~41.9% QoQ, indicating improving profitability trend (though magnitude suggests possible non-recurring effects).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Net income increased strongly, but cash flow details are not provided. Dividend is supported by earnings historically, though payout ratios exceeded 100% in earlier quarters, suggesting some volatility.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Strong

Total assets grew to $5.77B (+1.5% QoQ) and equity to $2.85B (+3.3% QoQ). Net debt improved dramatically to $0 (from $2.49B QoQ), strengthening balance-sheet resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total return momentum is strong: price is up +36.1% over 1Y (>20% threshold). Dividend increased to $0.50 from $0.445, supporting shareholder yield alongside capital gains.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is $64.5 vs current $63.75 (limited near-term upside). Valuation appears less demanding relative to prior quarters’ higher P/E readings, but earnings volatility warrants caution.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

First Industrial Realty (FR) delivered steady Q1 2026 fundamentals with 94.3% in-service occupancy and strong leasing momentum—61% of 2026 rollovers by square footage and 41% cash rental rate increases. Cash same-store NOI growth of 8.7% (ex-termination fees) was driven by higher rental rates and lower free rent, partly offset by lower average occupancy. Development leasing remained a key catalyst, with 383,000 sq ft signed and increased touring/decision velocity for spaces under 200,000 sq ft. The company maintained full-year guidance ranges after updating for $0.04/share incremental advisory costs tied to a contested proxy campaign, while excluding those costs implied FFO guidance is unchanged at $3.09–$3.19. The pending $131 million Phoenix land sale (June close) is a major value event, but modeled mechanics create near-term FFO dilution through line-of-credit paydown. Key risks center on execution timing, credit watch items, and slower large-tenant decision-making in Denver.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Development leasing: 383,000 square feet total signed in Q1 2026, including full-building lease for 155,000 sq ft First Wilson 2 (Inland Empire) and several sub-100,000 sq ft deals across Chicago, South Florida, Central Florida, and Central Pennsylvania (First Park 33, Lehigh Valley; 54,000 sq ft).
  • Southern California renewal/rollover momentum: largest remaining 2026 expiration (556,000 sq ft in Southern California) achieved cash run rate change exceeding the top end of 2026 annual guidance range.
  • Pending Phoenix land monetization: 100-acre ground lessee exercised option to purchase for $131 million (expected to close in June), driving value creation and potentially funding debt reduction.

Business Development

  • Phoenix land transaction: ground lessee exercised option for 100 acres; sales price $131 million; expected close in June.
  • 3PL tenant on credit watch list: signed agreement requiring lump-sum payment of ~60% of the balance Otis at December 31, 2025 (received in March) plus scheduled payments to extinguish remaining past-due rent by end of 2026.
  • Boohoo sublet marketing: building continues to be marketed for sublet; management indicated Amazon is about to ink two additional >1 million sq ft buildings in Pennsylvania.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q1 2026 NAREIT FFO: $0.68 per fully diluted share vs $0.68 in Q1 2025; negatively impacted by $0.04 per share advisory costs related to a contested proxy campaign initiated by L&B.
  • Ex-advisory costs: Q1 2026 FFO per share would have been $0.72.
  • Cash same-store NOI growth (ex-termination fees): 8.7% for the quarter.
  • Leasing velocity/metrics: 61% of 2026 rollovers handled by square footage; cash rental rate increase for new/renewal leasing of 41%; touring activity increased for availabilities, especially <200,000 sq ft within development portfolio.
  • Guidance reset: 2026 200 NAREIT FFO guidance range reduced by $0.03 to $0.04 per share (down to $3.05 to $3.15) to reflect $0.04 per share incremental advisory costs; absent these costs, 2026 FFO guidance is $3.09 to $3.19 (unchanged).
  • In-service occupancy: 94.3% at quarter end, in line with expectations.
  • Guidance assumptions: average quarter-end in-service occupancy 94% to 95%; cash same-store NOI growth before termination fees 5% to 6%; 2026 guidance capitalizes ~$0.08 per share of interest on completed/under-construction developments; G&A $42M to $43M excluding $5.6M incremental proxy-related advisory costs.
  • Same-store/free rent driver: results driven by higher rental rates on new/renewals, lower free rent and contractual rent bumps, partially offset by lower average occupancy.
  • Bad debt: Q1 bad debt expense $0.10M vs guidance $0.25M; full-year quarterly guidance maintained at $0.25M for 2Q, 3Q, 4Q.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: management referenced an “announced buyback” and discussed opportunistic repurchases during periods of stock dislocation; specific dollar amount/authorization not provided in the transcript excerpt.
  • Land sale funding mechanics: guidance assumes Phoenix land sale closes in June and that proceeds are used to pay down the line of credit (implying temporary NOI dilution vs FFO uplift).

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Leasing strategy emphasized: decision-making acceleration in spaces <200,000 sq ft within development portfolio; increased touring activity and stronger velocity for smaller configurations.
  • Development phasing in Central Pennsylvania: 708,000 sq ft development leasing is positioned for the second half of 2026; management preferred to secure more leasing before beginning Phase II (post early-phase leasing, including 54,000 sq ft).
  • Building design approach: multi-tenant flexibility remains intentional; smaller suites within larger buildings were described as always part of the plan, not a new strategy shift.
  • Concessions: on new leases, rent concessions generally ~0.5 to 1.0 month of rent per year of term; drifted upward slightly market/asset by asset.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Market context (CBRE): national vacancy stable at 6.7% end of Q1 2026; net absorption 43M sq ft vs new deliveries 55M sq ft; starts muted at 39M sq ft; construction pipeline 237M sq ft, 39% pre-leased.
  • Industry/portfolio outlook: no discernible impact to leasing activity from Middle East conflict thus far (risk monitored).
  • Guidance specifics: 2026 NAREIT FFO 200 range $3.05 to $3.15 (includes $0.04/share advisory costs); or $3.09 to $3.19 excluding advisory costs; occupancy 94% to 95%; cash same-store NOI growth ex-termination fees 5% to 6%; land sale expected to close in June.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Contested proxy campaign: incremental ~$0.04 per share advisory costs pressured FFO guidance down $0.03 to $0.04 per share within the guidance range.
  • Execution/timing risk: Phoenix land sale modeled to close in June; timing variance could affect guidance and liquidity path (line-of-credit paydown assumption).
  • Macro/geopolitical uncertainty: Middle East conflict could impact demand/leasing; management reported no observable impact yet.
  • Credit/collections risk: 3PL tenant on credit watch required lump-sum and scheduled payments; while no same-store/FFO impact, it remains a monitored risk.
  • Denver leasing risk: large-user decision-making described as slow despite limited competitive supply; smaller/midsize tenants more active.
  • Concentration risk management: management emphasized holding back on additional starts partly due to concentration and desire for more leasing before Phase II in Central Pennsylvania.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Data center adjacency vs broader industrial demand: Management said improved velocity in the <200,000 sq ft tier is “most” consistent with broader industrial demand rather than a data-center-driven surge. They cited active 3PLs and manufacturing pickup (tech, aerospace), noting data-center demand helps on the margin rather than creating a wave of new lease signings.
  • Topic: Why guidance wasn’t raised despite strong leasing YTD: Management explained that leased 400,000 sq ft development leasing helped FFO slightly versus guidance, but that was offset by the assumed June Phoenix land sale (modeled as dilution because proceeds pay down the line of credit and remove NOI). They also updated quarter-specific leasing assumptions.
  • Topic: Land sale economics and pace of unlocking value from land bank: Management confirmed the Phoenix transaction is on-balance-sheet (not in a JV) with disclosed cap rate ~5.3%. They said value uplift depends on securing power first, a lengthy process; they’ve narrowed the land bank to only a handful of higher-better-use opportunities where power would add value above industrial.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the FR Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) Financial Profile