GitLab Inc.

GitLab Inc. (GTLB) Market Cap

GitLab Inc. has a market capitalization of $5.83B.

Price: $34.51

0.79 (2.34%)

Market Cap: 5.83B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: William Staples

Sector: Technology

Industry: Software - Application

IPO Date: 2021-10-14

Website: https://about.gitlab.com

GitLab Inc. (GTLB) - Company Information

Market Cap: 5.83B|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

GitLab Inc., through its various operating entities, specializes in developing software solutions that facilitate the entire software development lifecycle. The company's operations span the United States, Europe, and the Asia Pacific regions. Its primary offering is GitLab, a unified DevOps platform. This single application is engineered to boost development speed, offering extensive visibility and precise command over every phase of the DevOps workflow. The platform's objective is to enable businesses to effectively plan, build, secure, and release software, thereby driving positive business results. Additionally, GitLab Inc. provides a range of associated training and expert consultation services. Founded in 2011, the enterprise was initially known as GitLab B.V. before officially adopting the name GitLab Inc. in July 2015. The firm's main offices are located in San Francisco, California.

Analyst Sentiment

57%
Buy

From 27 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $34.71

▲ +0.6% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$26

Median

$35

High Bound

$60

Average

$35

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$34.71
▲ +0.58% Upside
Low Target
$26.00
-25% Risk
Median Target
$35.00
1% Mid
High Target
$60.00
74% Max
Consensus
Hold
11 / 30 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MApr 30, 2026Jan 31, 2026Oct 31, 2025Jul 31, 2025Apr 30, 2025Jan 31, 2025Oct 31, 2024Jul 31, 2024
Market Cap ($M)5,8293,7635,8008,0917,2707,67711,8648,8288,180
Enterprise Value ($M)5,4933,4275,5707,8677,0097,42111,6378,6527,742
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-228.69-184.50-567.86-243.75-197.34-53.03259.8674.65160.09
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-127.91-86.46-68.53-19.73-36.4333.1210.1220.22
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)5.8014.2422.2733.1130.8135.7956.1145.0344.80
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)5.953.825.858.778.399.5015.2912.1812.73
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)22.1325.63138.80284.99156.4772.84191.15-49.57754.22
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)12.9721.3932.1929.7034.6055.0444.1342.40
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-944.36-14280.221590.60-1917.74-1408.28-238.29-4438.07-1060.82-324.73
Debt to Equity Ratio57.660.000.000.000.00

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 GITLAB INC CLASS A (GTLB) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

GitLab delivers an integrated DevOps and DevSecOps platform that spans the software delivery lifecycle—source control, issue tracking, CI/CD, security scanning, compliance workflows, and release management—within a single product surface. The operating model is built around two deployment motions: (1) a hosted SaaS offering and (2) self-managed deployments for organizations that require on-prem, private cloud, or regulated connectivity. Revenue is driven by enterprise adoption of the platform across teams and projects, supported by paid tiers that unlock higher capacity and advanced functionality (notably security and governance capabilities).

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation model is primarily subscription-based. Customers pay for access and capabilities across GitLab’s modules, typically indexed to usage metrics such as seats/users and/or feature entitlements, with enterprise agreements that scale with deployment breadth and team adoption. For many customers, monetisation is reinforced by add-on value: security, compliance, and operational governance features that expand seat consumption and tier upgrades. For SaaS, software subscription revenue is the dominant driver; for self-managed, license/subscription revenue is driven by maintaining and expanding enterprise feature usage, along with support and upgrades. Margin profile is supported by software-like cost dynamics, with operating leverage emerging as enterprise seats grow while R&D scales across the same core platform.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

GitLab’s core moat is high switching costs created by data gravity and workflow entrenchment. Engineering teams generate and maintain substantial operational and security-critical data inside the platform (repositories, CI/CD artifacts, pipelines, scan results, compliance evidence, issue histories, and configuration). Once teams standardize around GitLab workflows, migrating those integrated dependencies—and re-establishing governance and automation—creates meaningful friction. GitLab also benefits from an integrated-platform positioning, where breadth across the lifecycle reduces “tool sprawl” relative to point-solution architectures and stitched workflows.

Competitive landscape (benchmarking): GitLab primarily competes with:

  • GitHub (Microsoft) — strong in hosted developer collaboration and ecosystem distribution, with security features increasingly integrated.
  • Atlassian (Bitbucket/Jira ecosystem) — strong in issue management and collaboration, often complemented by CI/CD and security tooling from other vendors.
  • AWS (e.g., Code services) / other cloud-native DevOps toolchains — strong in infrastructure-centric delivery workflows, where security and governance may span multiple services.

Positioning vs rivals: Compared with GitHub and Bitbucket-led stacks, GitLab’s focus on providing an end-to-end lifecycle tool within one cohesive system can lower integration overhead and support broader enterprise standardization. Compared with cloud-native point deployments, GitLab’s ability to operate in hybrid and regulated environments (self-managed and controlled connectivity) supports enterprises that need consistent governance across on-prem and cloud.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • DevOps/DevSecOps platform consolidation: Enterprises continue shifting from fragmented toolchains toward consolidated platforms that reduce integration and operational overhead.
  • Software supply chain security demand: Growing emphasis on vulnerability management, secure pipelines, and auditable compliance increases the value of integrated security workflows and governance features.
  • Hybrid and regulated deployment needs: Persistent demand for controlled environments and consistent security posture across on-prem, private cloud, and SaaS increases suitability for self-managed and hybrid deployments.
  • Expansion within accounts: Once teams adopt GitLab for core delivery workflows, expansion across additional modules (security, governance, compliance, and automation) supports multi-year seat and tier growth.
  • Enterprise data gravity: As pipeline and security evidence accumulate, entrenched usage raises the probability of renewal and expansion, supporting longer customer lifecycles than single-purpose tools.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Competitive bundling and platform economics: Large incumbents can bundle developer tooling and security capabilities, potentially increasing pricing pressure and compressing net retention if switching incentives remain low but budgets become constrained.
  • Technological substitution risk: New workflow frameworks or integrated cloud platforms could reduce demand for certain modules, requiring continuous product velocity and clear differentiation.
  • Deployment and implementation friction: Enterprise adoption can be sensitive to change-management effort, security configuration, and migration complexity—factors that can slow expansion or raise churn risk.
  • Security and reliability expectations: As GitLab becomes more embedded in pipeline operations and governance, any incident, performance degradation, or perceived security gap can materially affect renewal and expansion.
  • Open-source and “build vs buy” dynamics: Broad developer familiarity with open-source components can keep competitive leverage tight, requiring GitLab to demonstrate tangible enterprise value through governance, integrations, and operational support.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values SaaS and platform businesses using EV/Revenue or EV/ARR, with multiple levels influenced by growth rate durability and the trajectory of profitability. Key value inflection drivers generally include: sustained subscription growth (especially enterprise seat expansion), net retention strength driven by upsell of security/governance modules, gross margin resilience reflecting scalable software economics, and operating expense discipline. For integrated platforms, investors also emphasize the credibility of long-term customer lifetime value, supported by switching-cost dynamics and account expansion.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

GitLab is positioned as an integrated DevSecOps lifecycle platform where data gravity, workflow entrenchment, and security/governance expansion create durable switching costs. Over a multi-year horizon, adoption and consolidation trends—along with rising software supply chain security requirements and sustained enterprise preference for hybrid control—support a path to steady subscription growth, with performance linked to account expansion efficiency and margin leverage.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for GTLB.

defenseworld.net2026-07-27

Bessemer Group Inc. Cuts Position in GitLab Inc. $GTLB

Bessemer Group Inc. cut its holdings in GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB) by 69.0% in the undefined quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 10,675 shares of the company's stock after selling 23,720 shares during the period. Bessemer Group

zacks.com2026-07-23

3 Internet Software Stocks to Buy From a Challenging Industry

The Zacks Internet Software industry participants like U, HUBS and GTLB are benefiting from high demand for AI-infused software, as well as cybersecurity applications.

defenseworld.net2026-07-21

Amova Asset Management Americas Inc. Grows Stock Holdings in GitLab Inc. $GTLB

Amova Asset Management Americas Inc. lifted its stake in shares of GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB) by 5.0% during the undefined quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 535,833 shares of the company's stock after purchasing an additional 25,473 shares during

businesswire.com2026-07-20

GitLab Appoints Thomas Lloyd as Chief Business and Legal Officer

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--All Remote - GitLab Inc., the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, today announced the appointment of Thomas Lloyd as Chief Business and Legal Officer. Lloyd will oversee business functions including product and cloud partnerships, corporate development and strategy, as well as legal functions, including serving as the leader of the broader legal and corporate affairs organization and as counsel to GitLab's board of directors."As organizations introdu.

zacks.com2026-07-20

GTLB Launches GitLab 19.2 With Governed AI Automation for Enterprise

GitLab adds governed agentic AI, security fixes and workflow tools as enterprise adoption supports strong revenue growth.

businesswire.com2026-07-16

GitLab 19.2 Brings Governed Agentic Automation to Clear the Backlog AI Coding Creates

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(All Remote)--GitLab Inc., the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, today released GitLab 19.2. As AI generates more code, dependencies, and change than developers can keep up with, GitLab 19.2 brings agentic automation to clear that load.Developers can now use GitLab to fix vulnerable dependencies automatically, catch the logic flaws scanners miss, create custom agentic workflows, invoke agents from more surfaces they already use, and always do so un.

247wallst.com2026-07-03

Where GitLab Fits in the AI-Driven Software Boom

GitLab (NASDAQ:GTLB | GTLB Price Prediction) sits in an awkward but strategic corner of the AI software boom: it owns the DevSecOps control plane where enterprise code gets written, tested, secured, and shipped, yet the market has treated it like a laggard.

zacks.com2026-07-02

Why Is Gitlab (GTLB) Up 1.9% Since Last Earnings Report?

Gitlab (GTLB) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock?

fool.com2026-07-01

GitLab vs. MongoDB: Which Technology Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

Both GitLab and MongoDB saw robust revenue growth in 2026, but their paths to profitability and risk profiles reveal key differences for investors.

fool.com2026-06-26

GitLab vs. Snowflake: Which Technology Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

GitLab maintains a strong footprint in the developer ecosystem, serving more than half of the Fortune 100 with its DevSecOps platform. Snowflake has achieved massive scale in data management, generating over $1.1 billion in free cash flow during its most recent fiscal year.

businesswire.com2026-06-23

GitLab Research Reveals Organizations Are Generating AI Code Faster Than They Can Control It

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ALL REMOTE — GitLab Inc., the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, today released its AI Accountability Report. Conducted by The Harris Poll, the survey of 1,528 developers and technology buyers across six countries finds that as AI coding tools become standard infrastructure, the conversation is shifting from how fast teams can generate code to whether they can actually control what they are shipping.The report defines AI accountability as the organi.

fool.com2026-06-18

GitLab vs. Oracle: Which Technology Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?

GitLab dominates the DevSecOps landscape with a high-growth, unified platform trusted by over half of the Fortune 100. Oracle remains a powerhouse in enterprise cloud and database infrastructure, supported by massive federal contracts and high net margins.

businesswire.com2026-06-17

GitLab Recognized as a Leader in the Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for DevSecOps Platforms for the Fourth Consecutive Year

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--All Remote - GitLab Inc., the intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, today announced it has been named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for DevSecOps Platforms. This Magic Quadrant, which evaluated 13 vendors, marks the fourth consecutive year GitLab has been named a Leader.As agentic software development tools accelerate coding, the remaining stages of the software lifecycle require agentic infrastructure that scales at the same pace. GitLab.

zacks.com2026-06-17

Gitlab (GTLB) Upgraded to Strong Buy: Here's Why

Gitlab (GTLB) might move higher on growing optimism about its earnings prospects, which is reflected by its upgrade to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

zacks.com2026-06-15

Wall Street Analysts Think Gitlab (GTLB) Could Surge 26.41%: Read This Before Placing a Bet

The mean of analysts' price targets for Gitlab (GTLB) points to a 26.4% upside in the stock. While this highly sought-after metric has not proven reasonably effective, strong agreement among analysts in raising earnings estimates does indicate an upside in the stock.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-04-30

"GTLB reported Q1’27 revenue of $264.2M and EPS of -$0.03, with net income at -$5.0M. On a YoY basis (vs Q1’26), revenue rose +23.1% ($214.5M to $264.2M) while net income improved from -$35.9M to -$5.0M (a +86.2% improvement in losses). QoQ (vs Q4’26), revenue was up +1.4% ($260.4M to $264.2M) and losses narrowed (net income -$5.0M vs -$2.6M), with EPS worsening to -$0.03 from -$0.0154. Profitability remains weak but trending better across the last 4 quarters: gross margin held high (about 85.8% in Q1’27 vs 88.3% in Q1’26), while operating margin stayed negative and net margin remained around -1.9% to -3.9% in the middle quarters, improving versus the deeply negative Q1’26. Operating cash flow was strong at $149.2M (+226% QoQ), supporting free cash flow of $146.8M. The balance sheet is liquid with $1.36B cash & short-term investments and no debt; equity is stable at ~$1.03B and net cash remains sizable. Total shareholder return momentum appears negative: the stock is down -49.2% over 1 year, with 0% dividend and no disclosed buybacks large enough in the dataset to offset price declines. Analyst consensus targets ($34.63) imply upside versus ~$21.42 current price, but valuation looks challenged given persistent net losses."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue grew +23.1% YoY in Q1’27 ($264.2M vs $214.5M). QoQ growth was modest at +1.4% ($260.4M to $264.2M). Overall trajectory is positive despite softer sequential acceleration.

Profitability

Caution

Net income losses improved sharply YoY (-$35.9M to -$5.0M; +86.2% loss reduction), but QoQ losses worsened (Q4’26: -$2.6M to Q1’27: -$5.0M). Net margin remains negative (-1.9%) and operating margin stays below breakeven (-5.96%).

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Operating cash flow was strong at $149.2M in Q1’27 and free cash flow was $146.8M. This contrasts with net losses, indicating working-capital/cash-generation support. No dividends; buybacks are limited (-$50.0M repurchased in Q1’27).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Balance sheet is highly liquid: $1.36B cash & short-term investments and zero total debt. Total assets were $1.71B, broadly stable QoQ (~-0.1% to -0.7%), and equity held near ~$1.0B, supporting resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Price momentum is weak: -49.2% 1-year change. Dividend yield is 0%, and buyback effects appear insufficient to offset the large price decline. Total shareholder return is likely negative.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target of $34.63 vs ~$21.42 implies potential upside, with a wide range ($24–$60). However, persistent net losses and negative earnings metrics (P/E not meaningful) temper valuation confidence.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

GitLab reported Q1’27 revenue of $264M (+23% YoY), 4 points ahead of guide, with non-GAAP operating margin at 14% (~+200 bps YoY) and durable retention (117% DBNR; gross retention >90%). Growth is increasingly tied to agentic enablement: paid SaaS code pushes are up 49% YoY and CI pipeline growth reached 38% in April. GitLab Dedicated reached $70M ARR, and enterprise traction is strengthening—$100k+ customers grew 18% YoY to 1,519, supported by first-order count up 30% YoY. The main negatives were offsetting pressures in a ~20% “price-sensitive” ARR cohort plus seat contraction from customer layoffs and M&A-related contraction, along with macro caution. Outlook is raised but remains conservative: no material Duo Agent platform revenue expected in FY’27 and potential execution disruption from Act 2; profitability trough is expected in Q3. Strategic bets (machine-scale Git rebuild, orchestration, Orbit context, platform governance) plus GitLab Credits/Flex aim to monetize expanding agentic workflows.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Duo Agent platform GA 2 weeks before quarter start; higher net ARR contribution vs Duo Pro + Duo Enterprise combined in any prior quarter
  • Code pushes across paid SaaS customer base up 49% YoY
  • CI pipeline growth accelerated to 38% in April (from mid-20s late FY’26)
  • GitLab Dedicated crossed $70M ARR milestone; $100k+ customers grew 18% YoY to 1,519
  • Transition/portfolio consolidation: transition Duo Pro and Duo Enterprise into DAP over FY’27 (single agentic platform + consumption model)
  • Consumption early traction: Duo Agent platform paid consumption run rate nearly $20M; CRR disclosed as early signal

Business Development

  • Expanded relationships with AWS, Google Cloud, and Anthropic (Duo Agent eligible against committed cloud budgets on their marketplaces)
  • Partnering with an AI lab on design/implementation of next-generation Git infrastructure for 100x agent scale (AI-lab name not specified in transcript)
  • Customer examples: top 10 U.S. bank pilot (nearly 20x expected active users at full deployment later in 2026/“later this year”); Zillow Group migration of 2,000+ engineers to GitLab Dedicated and piloting Duo Agent platform
  • CSL Behring signed a multiyear commitment to GitLab Ultimate and Duo Agent platform

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $264M, up 23% YoY and 4 percentage points ahead of guide
  • Non-GAAP operating margin: 14%, up ~200 bps YoY
  • Non-GAAP operating income: $38M vs $26M prior year
  • Non-GAAP gross margin: 88%; SaaS mix ~1/3 of revenue, grew 37% YoY (driven by Dedicated and Duo)
  • Dollar-based net retention: 117%; gross retention remains well above 90%
  • Customers: 1,519 customers paying >$100k ARR, up 18% YoY; 10,831 customers paying at least $5k ARR (~>95% of total ARR base)
  • Q1 benefited from $2M nonrecurring overages and early renewals
  • Price-sensitive cohort: ~20% of ARR remained under pressure; more seat contraction than anticipated (including customer layoffs) and M&A-related contraction headwind
  • Cash flow/capital allocation: adjusted free cash flow $147M; free cash flow margin 56%
  • Expenses: JiHu non-GAAP expenses $3.1M vs $3.1M prior year; expects $15M JiHu expenses in FY’27 vs $13M last year

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Ended Q1 with $1.36B cash and investments
  • Repurchased ~2.4 million shares in Q1
  • Remaining under authorization: $350M
  • No debt/cash runway specifics beyond $1.36B cash & investments were provided in the transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Act 2 restructuring: exit 22 countries; reduce geographic footprint by ~37%; flatten org with up to 3 layers removed
  • Workforce impact: ~14% (350 team members) impacted from those employed as of Jan 31, 2026; incur $30M–$35M pretax restructuring charges (about $19M expected in Q2); remaining recognized over next 3 quarters
  • Reinvestment focus for Act 2 savings: people (retain/invest in staying workforce), technology (reallocate/increase R&D toward architectural bets), process (AI-driven speed/automation)
  • Generational rebuild of Git begins this quarter to support 100x agentic scale; includes partnering for agent-optimized APIs to store/retrieve context
  • Orchestration bet: extend CI/CD from humans-only steps to coordination between humans and agents, expanding into artifact management, governance/compliance, and continuous deployment
  • Context bet: building GitLab Orbit API-accessible context service, monetized via consumption credits
  • Governance bet: identity/audit policy/deployment flexibility as core platform services; agent pipelines/MRs run through them by default
  • Business model progression: move to consumption via GitLab Credits; consumption flexibility program GitLab Flex to be unveiled at Transcend next week

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 FY’27 guidance: revenue $272M–$274M (~15%–16% YoY); non-GAAP operating income $30M–$32M; non-GAAP EPS $0.17–$0.18 on 168M weighted avg diluted shares
  • FY’27 guidance (raised): revenue $1.112B–$1.118B (~16%–17% YoY); non-GAAP operating income $135M–$141M; non-GAAP EPS $0.79–$0.82 on 166M weighted avg diluted shares
  • FY’27 gross margin outlook: 85%–87%
  • Profitability trough expected in Q3 due to timing of investments post-restructuring
  • Assumptions/prudence: no meaningful bounce-back in public sector in FY’27 despite Q1 improvement; expect no material revenue contribution from GitLab Duo Agent platform in FY’27 (converting pilots to production/new adopters instead)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Macro remains uncooperative; company does not assume meaningful public sector bounce-back in FY’27
  • Price-sensitive cohort (~20% of ARR) under pressure; more seat contraction than anticipated (including customer layoffs) and M&A-related contraction
  • Risk of near-term disruption and execution risk from Act 2 operationalization (including careful continuity considerations for quota-carrying sales force)
  • No material FY’27 Duo Agent platform revenue expected; reliance on pilot-to-production conversion
  • Profitability timing: expects trough in Q3 due to restructuring/investment cadence

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Competitive landscape/win rates: Management said agent-driven infrastructure load is benefiting enterprise-focused adoption; Q1 showed notable increases in enterprises seeking GitLab as platform, with small YoY win-rate improvement and a first-order count inflection (+30% YoY) attributed to product-led and sales-led campaigns plus an upcoming 100x Git infrastructure demo at Transcend.
  • Guidance conservatism/execution disruption: Management explained assumptions largely played out as expected after beating revenue and non-GAAP operating income vs guide in Q1. They emphasized ratable business, strong visibility, but embedded prudence for customer churn/contraction plus M&A headwinds and potential disruption from large-scale RIFs and organizational changes.
  • Nontechnical-user monetization/product fit: Management described a growing pattern of teams (PMs, designers, program managers) asking for additional seats to contribute code using agentic tools. They indicated seat-based pricing is appropriate given similar requirements/value across the software life cycle, with Duo Agent platform also supporting those users.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the GTLB Q1 2027 (quarter ended prior to 2026-06-02 call; dated 2026-06-02) earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for GTLB.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (GTLB)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — GitLab Inc. (GTLB) Financial Profile