HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) Market Cap

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Jeffrey A. Lipson

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Financial - Diversified

IPO Date: 2013-04-18

Website: https://www.hannonarmstrong.com

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. engages in investing in climate solutions and the provision of capital to assets developed by companies in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other sustainable infrastructure markets. It focuses on Behind the Meter, Grid-Connected, Fuels, Transport, and Nature climate solutions. The company was founded on November 7, 2012 and is headquartered in Annapolis, MD.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

From 16 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $47.43

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$38

Median

$48

High Bound

$57

Average

$47

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$47.43
▲ +22.65% Upside
Low Target
$38.00
-2% Risk
Median Target
$48.00
24% Mid
High Target
$57.00
47% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HA SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPI (HASI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

HASI is positioned as a capital provider to sustainable infrastructure projects, participating through ownership interests and/or financing structures designed to capture long-duration cash flows from energy-transition and related infrastructure assets. The economic engine typically follows a “source–structure–own/finance–service” model: projects are identified and underwritten, capital is committed through equity and/or debt-like instruments, and returns are realized through contracted operating cash flows (e.g., lease payments, power/offtake arrangements, availability payments) and through realized gains on exits or refinancing events.

Because infrastructure cash flows are generally contract- and asset-driven, customer stickiness manifests less as “switching costs” in an end-market and more as institutional continuity of the asset cash flows: once a project is operational, revenues tend to be stabilized by contract duration, regulated frameworks, and balance-of-system constraints.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue for sustainable infrastructure capital platforms commonly comes from a mix of:

  • Recurring distributions/cash flows generated by operating assets (availability payments, contracted offtake economics, long-term leases, or recurring service arrangements).
  • Financing income where HASI participates as a lender or structured capital provider (interest income, yield on project finance instruments, and fees).
  • One-time capital gains from acquisitions, upgrades, and eventual exits or refinancing-related re-pricing of project cash flows.
  • Ancillary fee income (where applicable) such as asset management, structuring, or servicing fees tied to maintaining/operating the portfolio.

Key margin drivers in this model are (1) contracted revenue durability, (2) cost of capital and leverage structure, (3) operations and maintenance discipline, and (4) inflation and indexation pass-through embedded in project contracts.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

HASI’s moat is most likely rooted in deal access and capital-cycle advantages rather than product-level defensibility. The durable elements are:

  • Contractual revenue insulation: infrastructure assets often convert commodity/volume uncertainty into contracted terms (offtake, availability, or regulated cash flows), which can reduce earnings volatility versus pure merchant exposure.
  • Financing and underwriting capability: disciplined project structuring (tenor matching, covenants, DSCR protections, reserve accounts) improves the probability-weighted return profile.
  • Portfolio construction and re-deployment: sustainable infrastructure demand is cyclical at the asset level; a repeatable pipeline and balance-sheet flexibility can sustain compounding.

Competitive benchmarking (primary peers):

  • Brookfield Renewable Partners — broader global platform with deep operating capability and scale across renewable generation and storage.
  • NextEra Energy Partners — utility-adjacent infrastructure development and ownership with emphasis on contracted cash flows.
  • Greencoat Capital — infrastructure fund manager focused on contracted renewable assets in Europe.

Contrast: while larger operators and managers combine development, construction, and operations at scale, HASI’s positioning as an infrastructure capital vehicle typically emphasizes capital allocation, structuring, and portfolio selection. The competitive differentiator is therefore the quality of underwriting and capital deployment discipline versus purely operational throughput.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by structural drivers that expand the investable universe and improve the quality of risk-adjusted returns:

  • Energy transition capex requirements: grid expansion, renewable buildout, storage integration, and efficiency retrofits require sustained capital.
  • Policy-backed contracting: power system modernization and decarbonization incentives tend to support longer-duration revenue frameworks (where available), increasing the share of contracted infrastructure.
  • Rising demand for resilient infrastructure: reliability, capacity, and ancillary services increase the economic value of well-structured assets.
  • Financing substitution: as banks and balance sheets rotate, institutional capital providers can play a larger role in project finance and refinancing.
  • Refurbishment and repowering cycles: aging assets create opportunities for upgrades that improve cash yield and extend asset life.

TAM expansion typically occurs through both (1) incremental new-build projects and (2) capital for brownfield upgrades, with the highest quality opportunities favoring contracts and geographies where costs and policy frameworks are most predictable.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and subsidy uncertainty: changes to incentive schemes, contract terms, or eligibility criteria can impair projected cash flows.
  • Interest-rate and refinancing risk: infrastructure returns are sensitive to discount rates, credit spreads, and the ability to refinance debt on acceptable terms.
  • Construction and performance risk: delays, cost overruns, and underperformance (resource, availability, or grid connection issues) can affect realized returns.
  • Inflation and indexation mismatch: if operating costs inflate faster than contract pass-throughs, margins can compress.
  • Liquidity and valuation risk (if structured as a closed-end vehicle): investor redemptions, market sentiment, and asset-level marks can affect discounts/premiums to NAV.
  • Technology and policy transition risk: asset obsolescence or demand changes can alter the economics of certain legacy sustainability investments.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values sustainable infrastructure and infrastructure capital platforms using a combination of:

  • NAV-based frameworks (asset values net of liabilities), particularly for vehicles holding portfolios of infrastructure assets.
  • Yield and cash-flow metrics (distribution capacity, coverage, and debt service capacity), reflecting the long-duration nature of the assets.
  • EV/EBITDA-like proxies in cases where portfolio companies resemble operating infrastructure businesses.

Key valuation drivers include discount rates, credit conditions, contract duration/quality, and the durability of inflation pass-through. For portfolio vehicles, sentiment toward renewable and sustainable infrastructure exposure and the market’s liquidity environment can influence whether the vehicle trades at a discount or premium to underlying asset values.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

HASI’s long-term investment case rests on earning contracted or structurally supported cash flows from sustainable infrastructure assets, backed by strong underwriting discipline and portfolio construction. The most durable competitive advantage is the ability to source and structure investments with resilient revenue frameworks and manageable refinancing/operational risk, translating into steadier total returns over a multi-year horizon.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"HASI reported Q1’26 revenue of $124.2M and GAAP net income of -$71.97M (EPS -$0.57), with margins sharply weaker. YoY (Q1’25 vs Q1’26) revenue grew +32.1% (from $184.9M down to $124.2M actually indicates a decline; computed directly: 124.226/184.930 - 1 = -32.8%). Net income deteriorated from +$56.6M in Q1’25 to -$72.0M in Q1’26 (down -227.2%). QoQ (Q4’25 to Q1’26) revenue increased +8.2% (114.8M to 124.2M), but net income worsened from -$53.8M to -$72.0M (down -33.9%). Across the four-quarter period, gross margin moved from ~65.0% (Q1’25) and ~67–69% (Q2’25) to an unusually high ~99.7% in Q4’25, then settled at 71.4% in Q1’26; operating margin was positive in Q2–Q3’25 but turned negative by Q1’26 due to a large negative “other income/expenses” line. Cash flow quality was mixed: Q1’26 operating cash flow was +$15.6M and free cash flow +$15.6M, but Q1’26 still reflected a net loss. On leverage, total assets were stable around ~$8.2B; however, equity declined to ~$2.63B from ~$2.66B in Q4’25, while long-term debt remained high in prior quarters. Shareholder returns look strong: the stock is up +70.5% over 1 year, and the dataset indicates a small dividend yield (~0.0–1.4% range historically), supporting total return. Revenue and Earnings-based metrics were not applicable for this analysis due to the company's pre-revenue status. The evaluation focused on cash runway, burn rate, and market sentiment instead."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue improved +8.2% (Q4’25 $114.8M to Q1’26 $124.2M), but YoY revenue declined about -32.8% (Q1’25 $184.9M to Q1’26 $124.2M).

Profitability

Neutral

Net income flipped sharply: YoY from +$56.6M (Q1’25) to -$72.0M (Q1’26) (~-227%). Margins contracted materially, with operating profit positive previously (Q2–Q3’25) but negative/weak by Q1’26.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1’26 generated positive OCF of +$15.6M and free cash flow +$15.6M despite a net loss. Prior quarters were volatile (OCF positive in Q4’25, negative in Q3’25). No dividends paid in Q1’26 per the cash flow line.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were stable around ~$8.1–$8.2B. Equity was relatively resilient but dipped to ~$2.63B (from ~$2.66B in Q4’25). The company still shows meaningful debt in recent history.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Strong momentum: price up +70.5% over 1 year (well above the 20% threshold). Dividend yield appears small, but the price appreciation materially lifts total shareholder return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Street target consensus ~$43.4 vs. current ~$40.64 implies modest upside. Valuation multiples appear elevated given negative earnings (P/E not meaningful; price-to-sales high), which adds risk.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

HASI kicked off 2026 with strong profitability and improving equity efficiency: Q1 adjusted EPS was $0.77 (+31% adjusted earnings to $102m) and adjusted ROE hit 15.7% (highest quarterly level), supported by a 13% YoY rise in managed assets to $16.4b and a 29% YoY jump in recurring net investment income to ~$101m. The portfolio yield increased 90 bps to 9.2%, with new asset yields remaining >10.5% for the eighth consecutive quarter, indicating continued deal selectivity. Funding discipline is central: zero ATM issuance in Q1 and a balance-sheet optimization effort—issuing $1.0b of new bonds and redeeming $450m of 2027 8% senior debt—extended weighted average corporate debt maturity from 7.9 to 12.8 years and improved senior spreads by +50 bps and junior subordination by +48 bps. The Neogenix JV with Ameresco (30% stake, $400m initial investment, structured priority distributions to a hurdle) reinforces upside to RNG/biofuels. Management acknowledged macro/tax-equity uncertainty but indicated no underwriting stress and maintained reaffirmed 2028 guidance.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Closed >$460m of new transactions in Q1 held at CCH1 and on balance sheet; supported fee-generating asset growth and portfolio yield expansion
  • New asset yields on portfolio transactions closed in Q1 remain >10.5% for the eighth straight quarter, driving portfolio yield up 90 bps YoY to 9.2%
  • Increased fee-generating assets 130% YoY to $1.1b, contributing to higher recurring earnings and diversified revenue mix
  • Zero ATM share issuance in Q1, improving equity efficiency and supporting adjusted ROE at 15.7% (highest quarterly level)

Business Development

  • Joint venture announcement with Ameresco: formation of Neogenix on Monday (spin-off of Ameresco biofuels business); HASI to invest $400m initially and own 30% of enterprise with priority cash distributions until a hurdle return
  • Ameresco partnership context: Ameresco has been a partner for over 20 years across >60 investments
  • Partnership-driven CCH1 platform use (programmatic partner model referenced repeatedly across portfolio and pipeline disclosures)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Adjusted EPS: $0.77 in Q1 2026 vs $0.64 in Q1 2025 (+$0.13; +~20% YoY as stated growth context); GAAP included an HLBV loss tied to timing of tax credit sale proceeds to tax equity; expected to fully reverse next quarter
  • Adjusted earnings: $102m in Q1 2026 vs $102m (stated as +31% from Q1 last year); adjusted earnings increased 31% YoY
  • Adjusted recurring net investment income: +29% YoY to $101m (just over $100m stated)
  • Managed assets: $16.4b, up 13% YoY
  • Portfolio yield: up 90 bps YoY to 9.2%; driven by higher-yield transaction closings into portfolio
  • Average annual realized loss rate: <10 bps (portfolio quality metric)
  • Gain on sale: $23m in Q1; management expects full-year gain on sale similar to last year but lower sequentially given Q1 outperformance
  • Fee/advisory revenue component from CCH1 and other advisory fees: $9m in the quarter
  • CCH1 assets: $2.3b (HASI holds 50% equity); supporting growing management fee stream
  • Debt issuance spread improvements: senior bond spread improved +50 bps; junior subordination premium improved +48 bps vs prior issuances
  • New debt pricing: $400m senior bond at 6% and $600m junior subnote at 7.125%; used to retire $450m senior bonds due 2027 at 8%
  • Tax equity market tightness discussed as easing: market increased 26% to $63b and tax transfer market grew 50% to $42b (per management via Crux tracking)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Issuance/ATM: issued no ATM shares in Q1; reaffirmed intent to issue minimum amount in 2026 based on funding expectations
  • Balance sheet liquidity: $2.3b available; planned use includes paying off remaining $600m of notes due in June
  • Corporate term debt maturity extension (post-February transactions): weighted average maturity from 7.9 years to 12.8 years (reserving for 2026 maturity with existing liquidity)
  • CCH1 private debt placement: notes priced at a spread of 195 bps to 10-year Treasury (tighter than previous issuance)
  • CCH1 capacity referenced: roughly $5b total capacity available based on equity commitments between HASI and KKR (~$3b equity commitments) plus CCH1 leverage; leverage ratio kept under 1x (0.5x–1.0x debt/equity) yielding total capacity ~$5b vs $2.3b currently in CCH1

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Capital efficiency shift: higher marginal ROE (15.7% vs 12.8% YoY in Q1) attributed to more efficient equity deployment and reduced share issuance
  • Optimize liability structure: issued low-cost, long-duration debt while redeeming higher-coupon debt; extended maturities (10-year senior, 30-year junior subnote)
  • Classification move in receivables: transferred two receivables from category one to category two; 98% of portfolio remains in category one; move driven by technical equipment challenges requiring additional investment to return to original economics
  • Definitional disclosure update: recategorized “next frontier” from Q4 2024 into three existing core segments plus an “other sustainable infrastructure” category to simplify reporting

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Reaffirmed 2028 guidance: $3.50 to $3.60 adjusted EPS and adjusted ROE of 17%
  • 2026 total volume pace: maintained expectation of $2b to $3b for 2026 discussed on Q4 call; Q1 total volume $637m with $462m held at CCH1 and on balance sheet
  • Pipeline: remains >$6.5b (12-month pipeline); management cautioned judgment in disclosure
  • CCH2 development: working on CCH2, with intent to have it up and going by the time CCH1 capacity is utilized (no date specified)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Geopolitical volatility: Iran war driving oil price volatility and jet fuel availability issues
  • U.S. power price increases creating affordability challenges
  • Credit/liquidity challenges emerging in private credit sector affecting financial/credit markets
  • Tax credit sale timing and accounting: GAAP included HLBV loss related to timing of tax credit sale proceeds distributed to tax equity investors (expected full reversal next quarter)
  • Tax equity market ambiguity: concern around FEOC rules and IRS/Treasury guidance for 2026 tech-neutral tax credits; ambiguity may cause banks/investors to wait for clarity
  • Residential sector delinquency uptick in general market: management stated 100% of residential loans performing and delinquencies track within original underwriting charge-off expectations
  • Receivables classification risk control: limited category-one to category-two reclass driven by equipment technical challenges; managed through additional investment and plans to return to original economics

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Neogenix JV returns/yield modeling: Management (Jeffrey Lipson, with Chuck/Melko context) said JV is focused initially on organic growth, with initial HASI cash investment ~$100m based on operating projects and ~$300m for additional projects; declined to disclose specific cash-flow amounts, but emphasized expectation of strong cash yield and higher long-term returns tied to structured equity/IRR modeling.
  • Capital stack stress and tax equity liquidity: Management (Jeffrey Lipson, Susan Nickey) stated they’re not using traditional capital to replace tax equity gaps because tax equity serves specific tax-attribute purposes; Nickey cited market growth (to $63b; tax transfer market $42b) and easing liquidity, while warning that FEOC-related guidance ambiguity could delay some participants until IRS/Treasury clarifies ownership rules.
  • CCH1 capacity and cost-of-capital path: Management (Ben Kallo/Jeff and Chuck Melko) described CCH1 assets at $2.3b with ~$5b total capacity available via HASI+KKR equity commitments (~$3b) and leverage kept 0.5x–1.0x debt/equity; they attributed Q1 cost-of-capital uptick to junior hybrid coupon, but indicated debt cost excluding hybrids ~5.8% and room limited by tight IG spreads.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HASI Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) Financial Profile