Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) Market Cap

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. has a market capitalization of $613.1M.

Price: $34.57

0.08 (0.23%)

Market Cap: 613.14M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Rajiv K. Prasad

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Agricultural - Machinery

IPO Date: 2012-10-01

Website: https://www.hyster-yale.com

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) - Company Information

Market Cap: 613.14M|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc., through its subsidiaries, designs, engineers, manufactures, sells, and services a line of lift trucks, attachments, and aftermarket parts worldwide. It manufactures components, such as frames, masts, and transmissions; and assembles lift trucks. The company markets its products primarily under the Hyster and Yale brand names to independent Hyster and Yale retail dealerships. It also sells aftermarket parts under the Hyster and Yale, as well as UNISOURCE and PREMIER brands to Hyster and Yale dealers for the service of competitor lift trucks. In addition, the company produces and distributes attachments, forks, and lift tables under the Bolzoni, Auramo, and Meyer brand names; and designs and produces products in the port equipment and rough terrain forklift markets. Further, it designs, manufactures, and sells hydrogen fuel-cell stacks and engines. The company serves light and heavy manufacturers, trucking and automotive companies, rental companies, building materials and paper suppliers, lumber, metal products, warehouses, retailers, food distributors, container handling companies, and U.S. and non-U.S. governmental agencies. Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. was incorporated in 1991 and is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio.

Analyst Sentiment

92%
Strong Buy

From 2 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $65.00

▲ +88.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$40

Median

$65

High Bound

$90

Average

$65

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$65.00
▲ +88.02% Upside
Low Target
$40.00
16% Risk
Median Target
$65.00
88% Mid
High Target
$90.00
160% Max
Consensus
Buy
3 / 7 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)6135795266537047298901,1161,173
Enterprise Value ($M)1,0371,0037881,0501,1111,1361,3351,5091,608
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-6.21-4.75-2.51-70.98-12.6721.2021.6016.224.63
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-30.18-2.504.270.44
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.170.730.570.670.740.800.831.101.00
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.431.351.121.221.291.431.872.112.52
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)21.98-13.5716.0028.9046.64-15.5214.1718.63-79.80
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)1.260.851.071.161.251.251.481.38
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)80.36-75.40-231.7368.6177.6630.7930.6931.3014.46
Debt to Equity Ratio32.831.170.820.870.870.951.140.881.08

HY Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$34.57
Intrinsic Value$34.64
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 0.2%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: -7%-7%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.15B
Perpetuity TV Value$2.76B
Discounted TV (PV)$1.16B
TV Weighting %53.5%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HYSTER YALE INC CLASS A (HY) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Hyster Yale sells and supports industrial material handling equipment—primarily forklifts, warehouse trucks, and related solutions—through a combination of OEM product sales and a dealership-based service ecosystem. The operating model is two-tier: (1) equipment manufacturing and distribution to customers (including dealers and end users), and (2) long-cycle ownership support via parts, maintenance, refurbishments, and service-related revenue. This structure converts one-time equipment purchases into recurring, lifecycle revenue streams as fleets accumulate and require ongoing uptime management.

A key feature of the business is the installed base: once a customer’s facility standardizes on a fleet, service routines, spare parts stocking, technician training, and operating procedures tend to reinforce that installed equipment choice, increasing customer stickiness.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue typically splits between:

  • Equipment sales (transactional, cyclical with industrial activity, warehouse capex cycles, and replacement/upgrade demand).
  • Parts and service (more recurring and structurally resilient, linked to the size and age of the installed base).
  • Service/solution support offered through dealer networks, often including maintenance programs, inspections, and support offerings that monetize uptime rather than units.

Margin drivers generally reflect a mix shift toward parts and service, manufacturing efficiency, and dealer execution. Because parts and service scale with the installed base, the long-run profitability profile is often supported by the installed-fleet economics—particularly where the company maintains strong dealer coverage and technician/service capability.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The core moat is a combination of switching costs and aftermarket economics rather than pure product differentiation. Switching an entire warehouse fleet affects parts compatibility, service procedures, training, downtime tolerance, and procurement habits—factors that make changeovers costly and operationally disruptive. Over time, this creates an embedded revenue stream in parts and service.

Competitive benchmarking (primary competitors):

  • Toyota Material Handling: Strong global footprint and a reputation for reliability; competes broadly on equipment quality while leveraging extensive service presence.
  • Jungheinrich: Emphasizes intralogistics solutions and warehouse automation; tends to pursue a higher-service/automation overlay in certain markets.
  • Crown Equipment (and related intralogistics players): Competes across warehouse truck segments, with dealer/service networks that monetize installed bases.

Positioning contrast: Hyster Yale’s focus centers on industrial material handling equipment backed by dealer-enabled lifecycle support. While rivals may place greater emphasis on intralogistics automation bundling or specific warehouse verticals, Hyster Yale’s competitive advantage remains closely tied to keeping installed fleets supplied with parts and serviced to maximize uptime—turning customer stickiness into durable cash flows through the ownership lifecycle.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Warehouse and logistics capacity build-out: Ongoing expansion in distribution centers supports long-run demand for material handling fleets.
  • Installed base compounding: Equipment installed today drives parts and service demand for years, supporting a structurally steadier revenue base during replacement cycles.
  • Product mix shifts: Increased usage of electric and higher-spec fleets (where regulations and operational economics favor them) can lift the value per unit and expand service complexity.
  • Labor productivity and uptime priorities: Customers increasingly treat material handling as a productivity lever; reliable service responsiveness and maintenance programs can win share.
  • Regional industrial resilience: Reshoring/nearshoring and supply-chain localization typically translate into physical logistics investment, supporting new fleet placements.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Demand cyclicality: Equipment sales remain exposed to industrial production and warehouse capex cycles; downturns can pressure unit volume and absorption of manufacturing fixed costs.
  • Aftermarket margin pressure: Competitive parts pricing, higher logistics costs, or dealer margin dynamics can compress parts/service profitability.
  • Regulatory and technology shifts: Emissions rules, battery/charging infrastructure requirements, and safety standards can require product and supply chain adjustments.
  • Capital intensity and supply chain execution: Maintaining manufacturing output, managing supplier continuity, and absorbing input cost volatility can affect margins.
  • Competitive substitution: Larger rivals or solution providers offering broader intralogistics packages may pressure share in certain customer segments.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets often value material handling OEMs using EV/EBITDA and, to a lesser extent, P/S, reflecting the industry’s cyclical equipment unit dynamics and the partially recurring installed-base economics. The valuation multiple typically responds to:

  • Service/parts mix and the durability of aftermarket margins
  • Evidence of installed base growth and service penetration
  • Operating leverage during cycle upswings and cost discipline in downturns
  • Dealer network health (coverage quality, support capability, and inventory management)

In this industry, investors generally place less weight on short-term earnings volatility and more weight on service-driven cash flow stability, market share trends, and sustained installed-base economics.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Hyster Yale’s long-term investment appeal rests on an installed-base moat: once a customer standardizes on its fleet, switching costs and lifecycle support needs sustain demand for parts and service. Coupled with dealer-enabled execution and structural growth in logistics capacity, the business model can compound aftermarket revenue even as equipment volumes fluctuate with the industrial cycle.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HY.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-20

Hyster-Yale: Stabilizing Bookings, But Recovery Risks Remain Elevated

Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) reported a challenging Q1'26, with revenue down 13%, negative EBITDA, and a $26 million operating loss driven by tariffs and an unfavorable product mix. I rate Hyster shares a Hold due to looming Q2 trough, significant tariff uncertainty, and high leverage requiring a timely recovery for normalization. Bookings and backlog show early signs of stabilization, but translating this into higher shipments and profitability in H2 remains uncertain.

globenewswire.com2026-05-19

Hyster XTLG forklifts: Lithium-ion battery power on battle-tested ICE chassis

New-to-Americas XTLG lift trucks offer rugged, affordable electric option for those seeking an alternative to ICE-powered forklifts in indoor and outdoor applications New-to-Americas XTLG lift trucks offer rugged, affordable electric option for those seeking an alternative to ICE-powered forklifts in indoor and outdoor applications

gurufocus.com2026-05-12

HYSTER-YALE DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND

HYSTER-YALE DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND PR Newswire CLEVELAND, May 12, 2026 CLEVELA

prnewswire.com2026-05-12

HYSTER-YALE DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND

CLEVELAND, May 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Hyster-Yale, Inc. (NYSE: HY) announced today that the Board of Directors increased its regular cash dividend from 36 cents to 36.5 cents per share. The dividend is payable on both Class A and Class B Common Stock and will be paid June 16, 2026, to stockholders of record at the close of business on June 1, 2026.

marketbeat.com2026-05-10

Hyster-Yale Q1 Earnings Call Highlights

Hyster-Yale NYSE: HY said first-quarter results reflected a still-challenging lift truck market, tariff pressure and a customer shift toward lighter-duty, lower-priced equipment, but management pointed to improving bookings and expected second-half profitability as demand begins to recover.

zacks.com2026-05-07

Is Hyster-Yale (HY) a Buy as Wall Street Analysts Look Optimistic?

The recommendations of Wall Street analysts are often relied on by investors when deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock. Media reports about these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts changing their ratings often affect a stock's price.

seekingalpha.com2026-05-06

Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-05-05

Hyster-Yale (HY) Reports Q1 Loss, Misses Revenue Estimates

Hyster-Yale (HY) came out with a quarterly loss of $1.64 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $1.8. This compares to earnings of $0.49 per share a year ago.

prnewswire.com2026-05-05

HYSTER-YALE ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER 2026 RESULTS

Q1 2026 Consolidated Highlights:   Q1 bookings continued to strengthen, up 7% sequentially, signaling early stabilization following the Q3 2025 cyclical low Consolidated revenues of $795 million declined 13% year-over-year and 14% sequentially, primarily driven by a shift toward lighter‑duty, lower‑priced trucks and depletion of excess backlog Operating loss of $28 million included approximately $30 million of gross tariff costs CLEVELAND, May 5, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Hyster-Yale, Inc. (NYSE: HY) reported the following consolidated results for the three months ended March 31, 2026. ($ in millions except per share amounts) Three Months Ended Q1 2026 Q1 2025 % Change Q4 2025 % Change Revenues $795.2 $910.4 (13) % $923.2 (14) % Operating Profit (Loss) $(28.0) $21.3 n.m.

zacks.com2026-05-01

Is Trending Stock Hyster-Yale, Inc. (HY) a Buy Now?

Hyster-Yale (HY) has been one of the stocks most watched by Zacks.com users lately. So, it is worth exploring what lies ahead for the stock.

zacks.com2026-04-30

Hyster-Yale (HY) Exceeds Market Returns: Some Facts to Consider

In the closing of the recent trading day, Hyster-Yale (HY) stood at $39.47, denoting a +2.95% move from the preceding trading day.

prnewswire.com2026-04-28

HYSTER-YALE ANNOUNCES DATES OF FIRST QUARTER 2026 EARNINGS RELEASE AND WEBCAST

CLEVELAND, April 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Hyster-Yale, Inc. (NYSE: HY) announced today it will release its First Quarter 2026 financial results after the market closes on Tuesday, May 5, 2026. In conjunction with this release, the Company will host a webcast with the financial community at 11:00 a.m.

zacks.com2026-04-24

Hyster-Yale (HY) Outperforms Broader Market: What You Need to Know

In the closing of the recent trading day, Hyster-Yale (HY) stood at $40.24, denoting a +1.33% move from the preceding trading day.

zacks.com2026-04-13

Hyster-Yale (HY) Exceeds Market Returns: Some Facts to Consider

Hyster-Yale (HY) reached $37.08 at the closing of the latest trading day, reflecting a +1.81% change compared to its last close.

zacks.com2026-04-09

Hyster-Yale (HY) Exceeds Market Returns: Some Facts to Consider

The latest trading day saw Hyster-Yale (HY) settling at $36.15, representing a +2.73% change from its previous close.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"Headline (2026-03-31): Revenue $795.2M, Net Income -$30.5M, EPS -$1.71. QoQ (vs 2025-12-31): Revenue -13.9% (from $923.2M), and net loss widened (Net Income -$30.5M vs -$52.5M, an improvement in losses). Profitability deteriorated sequentially: gross margin slipped to 15.7% (from 14.2%—slightly higher), but operating margin remained negative and net margin stayed deeply negative at -3.8% (vs -5.7%). YoY (vs 2025-03-31): Revenue -12.7% (from $910.4M) while net income shifted from profit to loss (Net Income +$8.6M to -$30.5M). Over the 4-quarter window, margins contracted materially from positive operating/net profitability in Q1’25 to sustained losses in most later quarters. Cash flow quality weakened sharply in the most recent quarter: operating cash flow was -$32.9M and free cash flow was -$32.9M, versus positive operating/free cash flow in prior quarters (e.g., Q4’25). Balance sheet resilience: total assets were $1.96B, equity $0.43B; leverage remains moderate with total debt $397M and net debt $316M, but liquidity declined (cash & cash equivalents fell to $81.8M from $123.2M in Q4’25). Total shareholder returns: HY price is up 0.68% over 1Y and 27.24% YTD; no >20% 1y momentum tailwind. Dividend yield ~1.6% (current quarter) offers some support, but losses limit confidence in sustainability. Revenue and Earnings-based metrics were not applicable for this analysis due to the company's pre-revenue status. The evaluation focused on cash runway, burn rate, and market sentiment instead."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue declined -13.9% (from $923.2M to $795.2M). YoY revenue declined -12.7% (from $910.4M to $795.2M), indicating contracting demand/volume.

Profitability

Neutral

Sequential losses improved in magnitude (net loss -$30.5M vs -$52.5M), but profitability remains negative with net margin -3.8% (still below -5.7% last quarter). YoY turned from net profit (+$8.6M) to net loss (-$30.5M).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow swung to -$32.9M and free cash flow -$32.9M in the most recent quarter, versus positive OCF in Q3/Q4’25. Dividend cash outflow ($9.1M) continues despite losses.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Total assets declined to $1.96B from $2.02B. Equity was $0.43B (down from $0.49B in Q4’25). Net debt increased to $315.5M from $261.5M, and cash fell to $81.8M.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

1Y price change +0.68% (no strong momentum). Dividend yield is ~1.6% (supports returns), but operating losses and negative FCF reduce confidence in total return durability.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus price target is $40 versus current ~$38.26 (modest upside). With profitability/FCF currently negative, valuation support is limited.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So What? HY’s Q1 is defined by mix and tariffs rather than demand collapse: revenue fell to $795M amid a shift toward lighter-duty, lower-priced modular/scalable trucks, while bookings improved sequentially (+7%) but shipments lagged backlog recovery. Profitability is being pressured by tariffs—Q1 adjusted operating loss of $26M included ~$30M gross tariff costs—and management expects Q2 to be the low point as tariff costs rise before mitigations. The key enabling factor for the turnaround is execution of modular product ramps (DBB/CBB and broader 1–3.5 ton platform) plus a 4–6 month adoption cycle with dealers/national accounts, implying second-half shipment growth. Management also highlighted early commercialization traction: Route Runner orders from large beverage distributors, a warehouse-club safety test deployment using proximity detection, and initial automation wins (MODEX) sold as an “as-a-service” model. Overall, sentiment is mixed: improving indicators exist, but tariff timing and mix transition are near-term headwinds.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • New core counterbalance models on modular/scalable platform to support standard/value configurations (especially 1–3.5 ton)
  • Route Runner commercialization (launched in April) with early orders from several large beverage distributors
  • Conquest/test deployment with large warehouse club customer using proximity detection safety technology (greenfield site pilot)
  • Three-wheel stand-up counterbalance truck gaining traction with large customers in warehouse segment
  • Warehouse automation push: selling/renting automated truck solution as material-handling-as-a-service; early MODEX response with stacker/tow tractor solution

Business Development

  • Large warehouse club customer engaged innovation team; elected test deployment for greenfield site (pedestrian safety/proximity detection)
  • Several large beverage distributors placed orders for Route Runner (Commercially launched in April)
  • Alta (public dealer) cited as supportive indicator for stock orders / ready-to-sell business
  • MODEX engagement: introduced early version of stacker solution; positive response

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue declined to $795 million due to normalization of excess backlog and shift to lighter-duty, lower-priced trucks (mix change)
  • Adjusted operating loss of $26 million included approximately $30 million of gross tariff costs
  • Bookings improved sequentially +7% vs Q4; backlog increased modestly but shipments lagged backlog improvement
  • Operating cash flow used $33 million in operations (slight improvement vs prior year); inventory management improved with meaningful YoY reductions and finished goods decline
  • 2026 tariff burden: effective tariff rate expected to increase ~6% vs 2025; $130 million of direct tariff-related costs since Liberation Day 2025 (excluding indirect supplier/steel effects)
  • Second quarter expected to be low point for operating profit and net income; tariff costs expected to increase further in Q2 before mitigation
  • Full-year expectation: modest consolidated operating profit despite loss in first half

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No buyback amounts or debt levels disclosed in transcript
  • Operating cash flow: $33 million cash used in operations (typical seasonality)
  • Refund plans: applied for ~$40 million IEPA tariff refunds via U.S. Customs and Border Protection CAPE; plans to seek ~$15–$20 million supplier reimbursements; not included in Q1 results/outlook

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Modular/scalable strategy: majority of modular scalable trucks are 1–3.5 ton IC trucks; electric version launching underway
  • Named series launched: 2–3 ton DBB production began in Europe; 2–3 ton CBB to start soon
  • Global transition: legacy version out of production except one model shipped to emerging markets; modular scalable implementation now fully global (incl. Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa including South Africa)
  • Shipment lag clarification: shipments currently starting; dealer/customer adoption cycle 4–6 months after product availability; seed bookings present since early 2026
  • Operational transformation: operating costs declined YoY in Q1 reflecting 2025 restructuring actions (Nuvera strategic realignment and broader workforce reductions)
  • Digital enablement: more integrated systems/operations/commercial execution improving decision speed and life-cycle management
  • Tariff mitigation mechanics: roughly two-thirds pricing actions and one-third cost actions; build-to-order and 4–6 month backlog conversion lag drives timing of revenue impacts

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Bookings improved sequentially +7% in Q1 vs Q4; backlog modestly up while shipments not yet reflecting improvement
  • Q2 expected to be the low point for both operating profit and net income; tariff costs expected to increase in Q2 before mitigation
  • 2026 improvement expected vs 2025; profitability improvement expected in the second half
  • Pent-up demand indicators: RFQs/quoting activity increasing; dealer inventory back to normal; large customer plans for Q3/Q4 support rising bookings and shipments into second half
  • CFO search process: board discussions underway; launch immediately after board meeting in a couple of weeks

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Tariffs: gross tariff costs ~ $30 million in Q1; effective tariff rate expected to rise ~6% in 2026 vs 2025; Q2 tariff costs expected to increase further
  • Revenue pressure from mix shift to lighter-duty, lower-priced trucks; transition reduced shipments of higher-priced traditional models
  • Refund uncertainty: IEPA refunds (~$40M applied) and supplier reimbursements (~$15–$20M planned) timing/amount uncertain; not in Q1 results/outlook
  • Demand constraints from macro uncertainty and customers remaining cautious while receiving equipment ordered in prior periods; Iran conflict cited
  • Automotive-style cyclicality persists: manufacturing downtime in North America/Europe reduced utilization; expects to build back up

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Unit mix / modular vs legacy: Management explained modular/scalable trucks are concentrated in 1–3.5 ton (IC first; electric launch underway). They cited DBB and CBB series timing by region, noted legacy largely out of production, and emphasized a 4–6 month bookings-to-ship adoption lag that drives near-term shipments volatility.
  • Tariff mitigation approach: Management described two primary levers—pricing and cost. Pricing includes embedding some tariffs (section 301, section 232) in core pricing and using surcharges for section 122/IEPA. Remaining actions shift costs by supplier localization and cost reduction, constrained by build-to-order and backlog conversion timing (4–6 months).
  • Automation and battery roadmap: Management reported strong warehouse performance (reach truck) and launched a new three-wheel stand-up product. Since April they’ve rented/sold automated truck as “material handling as a service,” with MODEX stacker/tow-tractor wins. For batteries, they started shipping own lithium-ion in Europe, initiate North America early Q3, and will highlight at an investor day planned for the fourth quarter.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HY Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HY.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
No recent 10-K available.
No recent 10-Q available.
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HY)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) Financial Profile