Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) Market Cap

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Adam W. Miller

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Trucking

IPO Date: 1994-10-25

Website: https://knight-swift.com

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) stands as a prominent provider of transportation services, specializing in truckload freight solutions for clients throughout the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Its operational scope is segmented into four key areas: Trucking, Logistics, Less-than-truckload (LTL), and Intermodal. Under its Trucking segment, the company manages a diverse portfolio of services, including irregular route, dedicated, temperature-controlled (refrigerated), flatbed, expedited, dry van, drayage, and cross-border transportation for a wide variety of goods and materials. Beyond its core trucking operations, Knight-Swift provides logistics and intermodal solutions, which include freight brokerage, intermodal services, comprehensive freight management, and various non-trucking offerings. The firm also extends a suite of support services, such as vehicle repair and maintenance, warranty coverage, insurance, equipment leasing, manufacturing and warehousing of trailer parts, and professional driver training through its academy. Additionally, Knight-Swift facilitates national transportation requirements through its regional direct services, utilizing third-party carriers to cover regions outside its proprietary network. The company commands an extensive fleet, comprising 18,019 tractors in total (16,166 company-owned and 1,853 operated by independent contractors), alongside 67,606 trailers. Its LTL and intermodal capabilities are further bolstered by 2,735 tractors, 7,413 trailers, and 10,847 intermodal containers. Its clientele spans a broad spectrum of industries, including retail, food and beverage, consumer products, paper products, transportation and logistics, housing and building, automotive, and manufacturing sectors. Founded in 1989, the company maintains its corporate headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona.

Analyst Sentiment

77%
Strong Buy

From 22 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $88.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$70

Median

$88

High Bound

$100

Average

$88

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$88.00
▲ +26.56% Upside
Low Target
$70.00
1% Risk
Median Target
$88.00
27% Mid
High Target
$100.00
44% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDIN (KNX) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Knight-Swift Transportation is a large, asset-based logistics provider focused on truckload transportation and intermodal services. The operating model is centered on matching customer freight demand with an owned and leased equipment network—tractors, trailers, containers, and related assets—supported by routing, scheduling, and dispatch operations.

Freight is moved under contracts and customer agreements that rely on consistent service execution: on-time pickup/delivery, predictable transit performance, and capacity responsiveness during demand swings. Intermodal services add a rail component for linehaul, using truck drayage to connect customers to intermodal ramps and rail networks. This structure creates practical “stickiness” because customers value transportation reliability and continuity more than unit cost alone, particularly when shipping patterns are operationally complex.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily transactional and volume-driven, earned from transporting shipments measured by distance, weight, and service type (truckload versus intermodal). Monetisation is influenced by:

  • Pricing discipline and capacity utilization: revenue per shipment and overall utilization help absorb fixed operating costs.
  • Fuel pass-through mechanisms: many lanes include fuel surcharges or cost recovery, reducing exposure to raw fuel volatility.
  • Network mix: truckload and intermodal margins differ by route structure, equipment turns, and rail pricing dynamics.
  • Operational cost leverage: driver wages and benefits, maintenance, insurance, and terminal/linehaul costs drive operating margin through the operating ratio framework.

While revenue is not “recurring” in a software sense, customer relationships often translate into repeat flow. Monetisation is ultimately a function of freight demand, pricing, and disciplined cost management that turns utilization into profit.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Knight-Swift’s main moats are rooted in cost advantages and service-driven switching costs, reinforced by network scale.

1) Cost advantage through scale and operational systems

  • Purchasing and fleet economics: scale supports more efficient procurement, maintenance planning, and equipment utilization.
  • Dispatch density: a broad base of lanes and customers can improve load matching, lowering empty miles and improving asset turns.
  • Process capability: standardized safety, recruiting, and routing practices can reduce variability in performance and costs.

2) Switching costs via service reliability and operational integration

  • Transportation customers often embed carriers into planning systems for capacity, pickup windows, and compliance requirements. Switching carriers can disrupt service levels, requiring time to re-qualify equipment, drivers, and operational workflows.
  • In both truckload and intermodal, dependable execution reduces the hidden costs of logistics failures (missed deliveries, expedited freight, and customer penalties).

3) Network effects (practical, not digital)

  • Higher network density can strengthen load matching and labor recruitment. This creates a reinforcing cycle: scale can improve utilization, which funds further investment in equipment, recruiting, and service infrastructure.

Competitive benchmarking

  • J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT): strong in intermodal and truckload. Knight-Swift competes by leveraging a broad truckload base and intermodal participation, while JBHT leans heavily into intermodal scale.
  • Werner Enterprises (WERN): focused on truckload and dedicated services. Knight-Swift’s diversification across service types and larger network density support broader lane coverage and flexibility.
  • Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL): primarily regional/less-than-truckload and time-definite services. Knight-Swift competes in heavier truckload categories where long-haul execution and fleet scale matter more.

Against these peers, Knight-Swift’s positioning is characterized by scale-driven cost efficiency and service reliability across multiple transportation modes, which helps retain share in capacity-constrained environments.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by freight demand dynamics and structural shifts in how goods move:

  • Intermodal’s share expansion: intermodal can be economically attractive versus pure long-haul trucking on many lanes as rail capacity and infrastructure improve, supporting secular volume growth.
  • Supply chain network re-optimization: reshoring, regionalization, and inventory balancing can increase total movement requirements and improve the attractiveness of carriers that can flex across modes.
  • E-commerce and “fast replenishment” logistics: demands higher service reliability and lane coverage—benefiting large carriers with operational depth.
  • Contracting discipline and capacity management: when industry capacity constraints tighten, well-run fleets can defend pricing and improve profitability, which then supports fleet investment and further productivity gains.
  • Fleet modernization and productivity: investments in equipment and maintenance systems can improve asset availability and reduce unit cost over cycles.

Total addressable market expansion is driven less by one-time demand shocks and more by persistent goods movement volume, modal mix changes, and the operational advantages of scaled carriers.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclical freight demand and pricing resets: trucking is sensitive to economic slowdowns; utilization and pricing can compress, pressuring operating margins.
  • Labor availability and wage pressure: driver recruiting and retention costs can rise, impacting cost structure and service coverage.
  • Fuel and energy cost volatility: while pass-through features mitigate some exposure, cost spikes can still affect margins through timing and contract structure.
  • Rail intermodal constraints: availability of rail service, terminal capacity, and congestion can create delays and reduce service reliability, undermining customer stickiness.
  • Regulatory and compliance requirements: hours-of-service rules, safety regimes, and emissions policies can raise operating costs and require operational adjustments.
  • Accident frequency and insurance cost trends: safety performance affects claim frequency and insurance pricing, with potential impacts to profitability and fleet operations.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values transportation carriers based on earnings power and cash generation, rather than long-duration growth narratives. Common valuation approaches in the sector emphasize metrics such as:

  • EV/EBITDA and EV/EBIT: driven by operating ratio performance, utilization, and equipment productivity.
  • Free cash flow and capital intensity: carriers require ongoing investment in equipment and working capital; valuation depends on the durability of margin and disciplined fleet spending.
  • Operating leverage through cycles: investors watch whether profits normalize or erode during demand swings, reflecting competitiveness and cost structure.

Key valuation drivers include sustaining cost advantages, defending pricing during capacity tightness, and maintaining service reliability that reduces churn.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Knight-Swift offers a long-term investment thesis anchored in scale-enabled cost efficiency and service reliability that creates practical switching costs across truckload and intermodal networks. The company’s diversified mode exposure and operational density can help protect performance through cycles, while secular freight trends—especially intermodal adoption and supply chain re-optimization—support continued volume opportunities.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"KNX reported Q1 2026 revenue of $1.85 billion, marking a slight decline of 0.33% QoQ and a minimal increase of 1.42% YoY. Net income dropped to -$1.31 million, down from -$6.80 million in the previous quarter and $30.64 million in the same quarter last year. EPS also dipped to -$0.01 from -$0.0419 QoQ and $0.19 YoY. The gross margins are contracting, with negative profitability in the recent quarter. Over the last year, total assets slightly declined to $11.95 billion, while equity remained relatively stable at $7.06 billion. The company maintains a low but steady dividend yield around 0.34%, despite operating losses. Total shareholder returns are substantial, with a 68.82% increase in stock price over the past year, including regular dividends. Market sentiment remains positive with strong price momentum, exceeding the median analyst target of $63.5. This suggests potential overvaluation risk, albeit overshadowed by recent growth, enhancing the attractiveness of KNX in the current market context."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue showed minimal fluctuations, with a slight 1.42% YoY growth and minor 0.33% QoQ contraction.

Profitability

Caution

Contracting margins with net income turning negative in the recent quarter show weakening profitability.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Cash flow is challenged with negative net income, but dividend payments continue consistently.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Stable equity and slight asset decline suggest solid balance sheet resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Exceptional price appreciation over 68% YoY coupled with consistent dividend support high returns.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Good

Current price exceeds analyst consensus target, indicating robust market sentiment despite potential overvaluation.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Knight-Swift delivered strong Q2 earnings with adjusted EPS of $0.63 (+80% YoY) and a 240 bps improvement in the consolidated adjusted operating ratio to 91.4%, driven by truckload pricing progress and network efficiency. Truckload was the standout: deadhead miles improved with a 140 bps deadhead reduction, yielding a 360 bps YoY adjusted operating ratio improvement to 91.0%, plus double-digit revenue/tractor ex-fuel growth. LTL also improved margins (+100 bps AROR to 92.1%) via freight mix and network density, despite shipments per day declining and revenue/100 lbs ex-fuel down 4.2%. Logistics was the main drag: gross margin fell 350 bps YoY, with AROR degradation of 160 bps, though management expects benefits from bid reset and broker displacement after the Montgomery ruling. Guidance calls for Q3 adjusted EPS of $0.71–$0.77, with fuel variability flagged as the key near-term uncertainty and Q3 driver-pay initiatives to support utilization and rate capture.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Truckload pricing reset progressing through Q2; contract improvements accelerated in June with more recent bids taking effect
  • Network efficiency: 140 bps reduction in deadhead miles and improved revenue per total mile
  • Intermodal load count and revenue per load growth with sequential momentum from Q1 to Q2
  • LTL freight mix improvement (weight per shipment and length of haul) supporting tonnage while metering shipments early in the quarter

Business Development

  • U.S. Express over-the-road rate progress as part of acquisition synergy (first profitable quarter since acquisition)
  • Montgomery ruling triggering shipper/broker shifts: customers diverting freight from brokers to asset-based carriers; broker insurance/cost pressure changing broker carrier vetting practices
  • Shipper behaviors emerging: higher insurance limits requests, questions on carrier vetting, and potential approval rights over broker-allocated carriers

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Consolidated adjusted EPS: $0.63 vs 80% YoY increase; GAAP EPS: $0.26 (+23.8% YoY)
  • Adjusted operating ratio: 91.4%, improved 240 bps YoY
  • Truckload adjusted operating ratio: 91.0%, improved 360 bps YoY
  • Truckload deadhead miles: 140 bps reduction; revenue per loaded mile ex-fuel +5.5% YoY; revenue/tractor ex-fuel +10.1% YoY; loaded miles/tractor improved for 7th consecutive quarter
  • LTL adjusted operating ratio: 92.1%, improved 100 bps YoY; shipments/day -3.7% YoY; revenue/100 lbs ex-fuel -4.2% while revenue/shipment ex-fuel +3.4%
  • Logistics gross margin: 15.4% (-350 bps YoY, -120 bps QoQ); adjusted operating ratio: 96.4% (+160 bps degradation YoY); Logistics expected margin benefit over time as bid/pricing resets occur
  • Intermodal operating ratio improvement: -470 bps YoY with +19.6% load count and +12.8% revenue per load
  • Tax rates: GAAP effective tax rate 34.1%; non-GAAP effective tax rate 24.4%
  • All other segments: operating loss driven by $5.8m accounts receivable securitization costs and $18.2m severance

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Convertible bond issuance in Q2: yield/coupon details cited as 1% to pay off floating ~5%
  • Expected annual pretax interest savings: approximately $44m after deal costs
  • Use of proceeds: $107m to purchase a cost spread raising effective conversion price from ~ $80/share to $105/share
  • Dilution sensitivity: if stock appreciates 87% to ~$115, dilution expected ~1% of current shares outstanding

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Enhanced planning tools rolled out to reduce empty mile percentage; ongoing traction over multiple quarters
  • Q3 targeted driver pay and productivity incentives to improve cede-truck count and opportunity capture while calibrating spend to sustainable rate gains
  • Efforts to reduce costs and improve execution; cyclical playbook preparation for improving rate environment
  • City truck percentage focus and margin restoration while seeking equipment utilization improvements
  • Logistics technology investment to improve responsiveness and capture opportunities; carrier quality discipline maintained (load count -16.4% YoY)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q3 2026 adjusted EPS guidance: $0.71 to $0.77
  • Expectations: fuel headwind in Q3 offset by efficiency gains, volume recovery, and pricing progress (cannot forecast fuel precisely due to variability)
  • Truckload: annual bid events winding down in Q3; mini bids, turnback bids, and rate reviews persist
  • Spot market exposure: started ~10% at beginning of year; now mid-teens; expects robustness continuing into peak season and beyond

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Broker logistics margins pressured by insurance and regulatory changes tied to Montgomery ruling; expected rising insurance costs for broker liability and potential exclusions around carrier vetting practices
  • Logistics gross margin decline: -350 bps YoY and -120 bps QoQ; adjusted operating ratio degradation of +160 bps YoY (management expects volume growth only at appropriate gross margins after pricing reset)
  • Driver market constraint: recruiting/retaining quality drivers more challenging; driver pay adjustments needed to protect utilization and margin
  • LTL shipments metering early in quarter to protect service; shipments per day still down YoY (April -6.5%, May -3.2%, June -1.3% YoY)
  • Fuel is an unpredictable P&L line; could be benefit or cost with high variability

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Timing of utilization/price normalization (deadhead and contract roll-in). Management tied pricing to June bid implementations and July follow-through, but emphasized it is ongoing via mini/turnback bids and churn. Utilization response leverages enhanced planning tools to reduce empty miles and prioritize unseated/seed opportunities while maintaining loaded-mile health.
  • Topic: Seated vs unseated tractor dynamics and how much progress is near-term. Management would only characterize seated progress as “incremental” with overall company stability and refused to provide a percentage trend. They cited twice-average industry freight opportunity they can’t fully exploit without more seated tractors, using Q3 driver-pay focus to improve driver supply.
  • Topic: LTL intra-quarter volume trend and fuel headwind framing. Management quantified shipments/day YoY as April -6.5%, May -3.2%, June -1.3%, explaining early-quarter metering to protect service and balance inbound/outbound freight, then opening demand mid-quarter. Fuel headwind is uncertain and cannot be forecast; variability could help or hurt Q3.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the KNX Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) Financial Profile