CS Disco, Inc.

CS Disco, Inc. (LAW) Market Cap

CS Disco, Inc. has a market capitalization of $250.1M.

Price: $3.90

-0.06 (-1.52%)

Market Cap: 250.12M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Eric Friedrichsen

Sector: Technology

Industry: Software - Application

IPO Date: 2021-07-21

Website: https://www.csdisco.com

CS Disco, Inc. (LAW) - Company Information

Market Cap: 250.12M|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

CS Disco, Inc. is a legal technology innovator that leverages cloud-native infrastructure and artificial intelligence to deliver advanced solutions. These solutions support electronic discovery, legal document analysis, and comprehensive case management for a broad client base, including corporations, law firms, legal service providers, and governmental entities. Among its key offerings is DISCO Ediscovery, which streamlines the entire e-discovery lifecycle. This platform significantly reduces the manual effort typically involved in gathering, processing, enhancing, searching, examining, interpreting, and presenting critical enterprise data relevant to legal proceedings. Additionally, DISCO Review employs artificial intelligence to consistently provide efficient and accurate document analysis. The suite further includes DISCO Case Builder, a collaborative tool that empowers legal professionals to construct robust cases by centralizing the search, organization, and review of witness depositions, evidence, and other pertinent legal information. These powerful tools find application across diverse legal contexts, such as litigation support, internal investigations, regulatory compliance, and due diligence efforts. Established in Austin, Texas, in 2012, CS Disco, Inc. maintains its headquarters there.

Analyst Sentiment

88%
Strong Buy

From 3 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $10.00

▲ +156.4% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$10

Median

$10

High Bound

$10

Average

$10

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$10.00
▲ +156.41% Upside
Low Target
$10.00
156% Risk
Median Target
$10.00
156% Mid
High Target
$10.00
156% Max
Consensus
Hold
3 / 11 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)250243488401268248300351349
Enterprise Value ($M)239232475380254222256282228
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-5.65-6.37-13.86-7.34-6.07-5.38-2.97-9.80-8.11
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-3.69-22.50-0.99-1.53-1.47-13.52-6.65
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.545.8111.859.807.026.768.119.689.70
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.001.963.813.071.941.742.032.102.04
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-12.93-19.641913.31-197.11-51.61-22.47196.02-93.97-267.06
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)5.5411.549.286.676.066.937.786.32
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-6.55-27.28-83.96-30.10-26.20-21.49-10.76-35.05-23.66
Debt to Equity Ratio0.310.050.050.060.060.060.060.050.05

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 CS DISCO INC (LAW) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

CS DISCO INC provides AI-enabled eDiscovery and document review software used by law firms and corporate legal teams. The platform ingests large volumes of electronically stored information (emails, files, and other data sources), organizes and indexes it, and supports collaborative review workflows. In practice, DISCO sits in the middle of the legal matter lifecycle—enabling teams to reduce the cost and time of identifying relevant documents, validating privilege and responsiveness, and producing outputs for litigation, investigation, and compliance-driven discovery.

Customer stickiness is driven by how the platform becomes embedded in specific matters: once a team has ingested datasets, configured review workflows, and built reusable query/search logic and review training artifacts, migrating to another tool imposes both technical and process disruption.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily subscription- and usage-oriented, tied to access to DISCO’s platform for legal review workflows. Commercial structures typically combine:

  • Seat/workspace or subscription access (recurring revenue)
  • Matter-based or capacity/usage components reflecting the scale of data reviewed and processing needs

Margin profile is supported by software economics (incremental cost discipline once ingestion and indexing are delivered) and by the value proposition of reducing expensive human review time. The key operational lever is sustaining high gross margins while scaling compute needs efficiently as customers process larger datasets.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Core moat: Switching Costs and Data Gravity (workflow + institutional knowledge embedded in review artifacts). As customers run repeated matters, the platform accumulates operational context—how the team structures review, the search/review logic applied, and the artifacts used to drive defensible outcomes. This creates friction for competitors because replacing the system requires re-building those workflows and re-processing prior practices.

AI assistance adds another layer of defensibility by improving review efficiency and consistency. While AI techniques can be copied in principle, practical performance is tied to product integration, customer workflow design, and proprietary feedback loops from repeated matter usage.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Everlaw — Competes in eDiscovery workflows with a focus on usability and analytics, but DISCO differentiates by emphasizing AI-assisted review and the depth of review workflow integration that strengthens customer stickiness.
  • Logikcull — Often positioned for simplicity and speed-to-value, typically competing for smaller teams/matters; DISCO targets a broader range of complex review workflows and relies on data gravity to retain larger deployments.
  • MS/legal offerings and incumbent suites (e.g., broader eDiscovery ecosystems) — These solutions can bundle capabilities; DISCO’s positioning emphasizes specialized review productivity and defensible discovery workflows rather than general-purpose document tooling.

Across these competitors, DISCO’s market positioning centers on making document review more efficient and repeatable through AI-assisted workflows, which supports retention and expansion within the same firms and legal departments.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Secular growth in electronically stored data increases both the volume and complexity of discovery, expanding the spend pool for eDiscovery and review software.
  • Shift toward defensible, consistent review as litigation and investigations demand higher quality audit trails and repeatable processes.
  • AI-assisted review adoption supports continued penetration as legal teams seek productivity gains and cost containment for document-intensive matters.
  • Enterprise and law-firm consolidation in platforms: once a review workflow is standardized within an organization, additional matters tend to use the incumbent tool, reinforcing growth through expansion.
  • Expansion of use cases from classic litigation discovery to investigations, regulatory requests, and compliance-driven document review where similar data-processing economics apply.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • AI performance and reliability: customer tolerance for errors in review or classification is constrained by legal defensibility requirements; model behavior must remain consistent and explainable within workflows.
  • Data privacy and regulatory compliance: processing sensitive client information increases compliance burden and vendor scrutiny across jurisdictions and contracting frameworks.
  • Competitive pricing and feature parity: larger incumbents or well-funded entrants can replicate user-facing AI features; sustained differentiation depends on workflow integration and measurable productivity.
  • Implementation and adoption risk: the value of the platform depends on correct setup, indexing, and review configuration; friction can slow time-to-value.
  • Cloud and infrastructure dependency: compute and storage costs can influence margins if customer data scales faster than cost optimization.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values DISCO within the broader software framework, where investors look beyond near-term results to sustainability of recurring revenue, retention/expansion dynamics, and operating leverage. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Revenue quality: mix and growth of recurring subscriptions relative to usage components
  • Retention and expansion: evidence that customers standardize on DISCO across matters
  • Gross margin durability: ability to manage compute costs as dataset sizes increase
  • Operating leverage: scaling sales and customer success productivity without diluting profitability

In software multiples, consistent indicators of customer stickiness (implied by renewal and expansion) often matter more than short-term swings in reported profitability.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

CS DISCO’s investment case rests on a defensible position in legal eDiscovery driven by switching costs and data gravity—once a legal team embeds DISCO into matter workflows, the cost of migration is meaningful. Coupled with AI-assisted productivity, DISCO is positioned to capture incremental spend from growing data complexity and the ongoing shift toward defensible, efficient review. The primary diligence focus is sustaining product performance and adoption depth while managing compliance and infrastructure cost pressures.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for LAW.

globenewswire.com2026-08-01

EMBECTA DEADLINE: ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Embecta Corp. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – EMBC

NEW YORK, Aug. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Embecta Corp. (NASDAQ: EMBC) between November 25, 2025 and May 4, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important August 17, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

globenewswire.com2026-08-01

ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages Bloom Energy Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - BE

NEW YORK, Aug. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE: BE) between February 27, 2025 and July 8, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 28, 2026.

newsfilecorp.com2026-08-01

ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Blaize Holdings, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - BZAI

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - August 1, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Blaize Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BZAI) resulting from allegations that Blaize may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Blaize securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

globenewswire.com2026-08-01

ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages Genius Group Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action Against Citadel Securities LLC and Virtu Americas LLC - GNS

NEW YORK, Aug. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers or sellers of securities of Genius Group Limited (NYSE American: GNS) between April 12, 2022 and May 30, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important August 28, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-31

ROSEN, A HIGHLY RECOGNIZED LAW FIRM, Encourages Microvast Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - MVST

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 31, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVST) between April 1, 2025 and March 16, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important September 21, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Microvast securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

globenewswire.com2026-07-31

ROSEN, A GLOBAL AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Microvast Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - MVST

NEW YORK, July 31, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Microvast Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVST) between April 1, 2025 and March 16, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important September 21, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-31

ROSEN, A HIGHLY RECOGNIZED LAW FIRM, Encourages GPGI, Inc. f/k/a CompoSecure, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - GPGI, CMPO

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 31, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Class A common stock of GPGI, Inc. f/k/a CompoSecure, Inc. (NYSE: GPGI) (NYSE: CMPO) between November 3, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important September 14, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased GPGI Class A common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A HIGHLY RECOGNIZED LAW FIRM, Encourages EquipmentShare.com Inc Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - EQPT

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of EquipmentShare.com Inc (NASDAQ: EQPT): (i) Class A common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus (collectively, the "Registration Statement") issued in connection with EquipmentShare's January 2026 initial public offering ("IPO"); and/or (ii) securities between January 23, 2026 and June 23, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important September 21, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased EquipmentShare securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Gildan Activewear Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - GIL

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Gildan Activewear Inc. (NYSE: GIL) resulting from allegations that Gildan Activewear may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Gildan Activewear securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - CCOI

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCOI) between February 29, 2024 and May 1, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

globenewswire.com2026-07-30

PICS DEADLINE NOTICE: ROSEN, A LONGSTANDING LAW FIRM, Encourages PicS N.V. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important August 4 Deadline in Securities Class Action – PICS

NEW YORK, July 30, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Class A common stock of PicS N.V. (NASDAQ: PICS) pursuant and/or traceable to PicS N.V.'s January 30, 2026 initial public offering (the “IPO”), of the important August 4, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A RANKED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Intuit Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - INTU

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU) between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important September 8, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Intuit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A HIGHLY RECOGNIZED LAW FIRM, Encourages GoDaddy Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - GDDY

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE: GDDY) resulting from allegations that GoDaddy may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased GoDaddy securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

newsfilecorp.com2026-07-30

ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages UP Fintech Holding Limited Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - TIGR

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of UP Fintech Holding Limited (NASDAQ: TIGR) resulting from allegations that UP Fintech may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased UP Fintech securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

globenewswire.com2026-07-29

ROSEN, A LONGSTANDING LAW FIRM, Encourages Genius Group Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action Against Citadel Securities LLC and Virtu Americas LLC - GNS

NEW YORK, July 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers or sellers of securities of Genius Group Limited (NYSE American: GNS) between April 12, 2022 and May 30, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important August 28, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"LAW reported Q1’26 revenue of $41.9M, up +1.8% QoQ (from $41.2M in Q4’25) and up +14.3% YoY (from $36.7M in Q1’25). Net income was -$9.6M, improving +11.6% QoQ (less negative than -$8.5M in Q4’25) but worsening -15.7% YoY (more negative than -$11.4M in Q1’25). EPS was -$0.15 versus -$0.14 in Q4’25 and -$0.19 in Q1’25. Profitability remains structurally loss-making, though there are signs of stabilization. Gross margin improved to 74.2% in Q1’26 (from 75.1% in Q4’25 and 74.1% in Q1’25), while operating margin is still deeply negative at -24.1%. The company’s cash flow quality is volatile: operating cash flow swung to -$11.7M in Q1’26 from +$0.8M in Q4’25. Free cash flow was -$12.4M (Q4’25: +$0.3M). Balance sheet resilience looks solid for a non-bank: total assets declined to $162.4M QoQ (from $173.6M), with equity at $123.9M. Shareholder returns: the stock price is $4.29 with a +25.1% 1-year change, which meaningfully supports total return despite no dividend activity (dividend yield 0%) and only modest buybacks ($0.22M in the quarter). Analyst consensus targets ($9, median) imply substantial upside from the current price, but fundamentals remain weak given continued losses."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue rose +1.8% QoQ and +14.3% YoY in Q1’26, indicating positive demand momentum.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income remains negative (-$9.6M). Operating margin is -24.1% and net margin -23.0%; YoY net income deteriorated vs Q1’25 and EPS stayed loss-making.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow turned negative to -$11.7M in Q1’26 (vs +$0.8M in Q4’25). Free cash flow was -$12.4M, reflecting pressure on liquidity generation from earnings.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

No debt on the balance sheet (total debt 0; net debt negative). Equity is substantial at $123.9M, supporting resilience despite asset decline QoQ.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

1-year price change is +25.1% (positive momentum). However, there is no dividend and buybacks were small ($0.22M), so total shareholder return is mainly price-driven.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus target is $9 vs $4.29 current price (implied upside), but valuation metrics are stretched and losses persist (P/E negative; no earnings support).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Q1 2026 showed strong execution and improving profitability for LAW (transcript references DISCO). Revenue grew 14% YoY to $41.9m and software grew 12% to $34.7m, both beating management’s high-end/above-mid guidance metrics. Services rose 25% YoY to $7.2m, with Auto Review adoption contributing through both direct software usage and conversions into Managed Reviews as customers progress in AI readiness. The clearest operational win was the DISCO platform launch: platform adoption outperformed expectations with more cases/matters and gigabytes, plus early signals of larger multi-terabyte matters, multiyear agreements, and higher committed revenue. Margin progress is material: adjusted EBITDA was -$3.5m with a 600 bps improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin (-8% vs -14%). Guidance was reaffirmed for Q2 ranges and FY revenue/trajectory was upgraded. Management emphasized no sales-cycle slowdown from frontier LLM releases and framed pricing simplification as a driver of higher consideration and reduced discounts.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • DISCO platform adoption outpaced expectations in Q1, with more customer matters and gigabytes than expected; early indications include larger matters, multiyear deals, and higher committed revenue
  • Increased wallet share among top customers (347 customers generating >$100k TTM revenue; $124m TTM revenue from these customers)
  • Acceleration in net new large matters added; these multi-terabyte matters expand over time and last longer on the platform
  • Continued adoption of generative/agentic AI capabilities, led by Cecilia AI/Auto Review
  • Managed services momentum tied to AI adoption—Auto Review driving conversions into Managed Reviews

Business Development

  • Mound Cotton: signed a 3-year enterprise agreement to make DISCO the provider of choice for eDiscovery across their firm following DISCO platform launch
  • Reynolds Frizzell LLP: expanded via a multiyear enterprise agreement; partner cited DISCO Cecilia capabilities and trust-based evaluation of AI tools

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Total revenue: $41.9m (+14% YoY), exceeding the high end of total revenue guidance range
  • Software revenue: $34.7m (+12% YoY), above midpoint of software guidance range
  • Services revenue: $7.2m (+25% YoY), driven by growth of professional services and review business
  • Adjusted EBITDA: -$3.5m, up 32% YoY; adjusted EBITDA margin improved to -8% from -14% (600 bps improvement) and exceeded the high end of guidance
  • Gross margin: 75% (flat YoY); management noted gross margin fluctuates based on data ingested/managed
  • Net loss: -$4.2m (-10% of revenue) vs -$4.9m (-14% of revenue) YoY; net loss per share: -$0.07 vs -$0.08
  • Q1 cash: $103m in cash and short-term investments; no debt
  • Q1 operating cash flow: -$11.7m vs -$10.5m prior-year quarter

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No debt on balance sheet
  • Cash and short-term investments: $103m at quarter end
  • No buyback/debt issuance amounts disclosed in the transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Pricing model shift aimed at increasing consideration, improving win rates, reducing discounts, improving stickiness, and increasing customer value
  • DISCO platform packaging: bundling AI capabilities (Cecilia Q&A, auto timelines, document summaries/definitions/case builder) with eDiscovery for a single competitive price; converting customers from individual products/ingest fees to platform
  • Cecilia Advanced Research (agentic): in testing with select customers on live case data; broader rollout to wait-listed priority customers targeted for next month
  • Auto Review: described as having two components today—part of it sits in software and part in services due to prompt-engineering/engineering setup; intent for increased software mix as prompting becomes unnecessary over time

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 2026 total revenue guidance: $41.5m to $43.5m; software revenue: $36.1m to $37.1m
  • Q2 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance: -$4.5m to -$2.5m
  • FY 2026 total revenue guidance raised to $169.25m to $178.75m; FY software revenue: $146m to $152.5m
  • FY 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance: -$8m to -$4m
  • Agentic AI timeline: Cecilia Advanced Research broader rollout to wait-listed priority customers expected later this month/next month (management referenced wait-list priority rollout later this month and testing preparation for broader rollout to wait-listed customers next month)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Potential variability/transition risk from customers moving from sets of individual products and ingest fees to the DISCO platform (management explicitly flags variability)
  • Macro/industry spending pressure: corporate clients controlling litigation spend increases scrutiny of ROI; reliance on customers seeking productivity/efficiency gains
  • Margin volatility: management noted gross margin fluctuates based on customer usage patterns and nature of data ingested/managed
  • AI tooling competitive pressure risk: management counters commoditization by emphasizing litigation-specific context; however, investor concern exists around large-model-driven commoditization and whether it impacts sales cycles (management stated no slowdown)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • AI frontier model adoption impact: Management was asked whether new LLM-based legal tools disrupt DISCO’s sales cycles or change how customers operate. Management responded that they saw no slowdown; instead, interest in AI increased and reinforced demand because DISCO’s litigation-specific context layer is more strategic than generic LLM tools.
  • Customer journey from standalone eDiscovery to DISCO platform: Management was asked how pricing and usage change when customers move from a prior single-solution setup to the “all-in” platform. Management cited pent-up demand and an easier-to-understand pricing model driving larger complex matters, increased revenue commitments, and longer-term agreements.
  • Auto Review/Managed Review dynamics vs software revenue: Management was asked how the strong add of >$100k customers aligns with software revenue being relatively flat recently. Management described the >$100k metric as a leading indicator because matters ingest then expand on-platform; Auto Review traction also shifts some revenue between software and services depending on customers’ AI readiness.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the LAW Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for LAW.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (LAW)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — CS Disco, Inc. (LAW) Financial Profile