Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) Market Cap

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. has a market capitalization of β€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: James Evans

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

IPO Date: 2007-04-13

Website: https://www.northernoil.com

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

Northern Oil and Gas, Inc., an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company primarily holds interests in the Williston Basin, the Appalachian Basin, and the Permian Basin in the United States. As of December 31, 2021, it owned working interests in 7,436 gross producing wells; and had proved reserves of 287,682 million barrels of oil equivalent. The company is based in Minnetonka, Minnesota.

Analyst Sentiment

63%
Buy

From 9 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $31.80

β–² +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$29

Median

$30

High Bound

$36

Average

$32

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$31.80
β–² +51.57% Upside
Low Target
$29.00
38% Risk
Median Target
$30.00
43% Mid
High Target
$36.00
72% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

πŸ“Š Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Enterprise Value ($M)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)β€”-1.38-7.41-4.676.985.3613.002.956.82
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)β€”5.294.654.964.815.136.796.836.70
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)β€”1.610.991.071.151.241.611.521.83
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”
Debt to Equity Ratioβ€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ NORTHERN OIL AND GAS INC (NOG) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Northern Oil and Gas Inc is an upstream producer monetizing hydrocarbons extracted from its operated resource plays. The value chain is straightforward: (1) acquire and develop producing acreage, (2) drill and complete wells using repeatable field development practices, (3) transport and process volumes through existing regional gathering and pipeline connectivity, and (4) sell crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs into regional and North American commodity markets. Customer β€œstickiness” is not the issue in upstream; instead, stickiness is created by acreage quality, development know-how, and the ability to deliver competitive realized prices net of transportation, operating costs, and royalties.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by three commodity streams:
  • Crude oil sales (priced to North American benchmarks and subject to local differentials).
  • Natural gas sales (linked to regional pricing with sensitivity to basis and transportation constraints).
  • NGL sales (typically realized as a fraction of crude/gas economics depending on product mix and processing capture).
Monetisation is predominantly transactional (spot-/index-linked), so the margin model centers on controllable levers:
  • Realized price quality (basis differentials, condensate/quality effects, and marketing/transport execution).
  • Operating cost per unit (lifting costs, workovers, water handling, and maintenance).
  • Royalties and regulatory burdens (progressive costs that scale with price and production profile).
  • Capital efficiency (how much production and reserve value is created per dollar of development spending).
Any price stabilization tools (e.g., hedging programs where employed) primarily function as risk management rather than a structural, recurring revenue source.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Northern Oil and Gas’s competitive position is best understood through a geographic cost-and-infrastructure moat typical of upstream operators that concentrate in regions with efficient access to midstream and transportation. Key moat components (hard-to-replicate at scale):
  • Geographic cost advantage: concentration in a core operating footprint can reduce per-unit logistics burdens (less trucking, fewer bottlenecks, and more reliable takeaway) relative to producers farther from processing and pipeline access.
  • Logistical infrastructure leverage: existing gathering and pipeline connectivity can improve realized pricing by reducing fees and outages associated with constrained transportation.
  • Operational learning curve: repeatable drilling/completion practices and a mature supply chain can lower cost and execution risk over time, improving capital efficiency.
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (primary peers in Canadian/North American upstream space):
  • Paramount Resources: concentrates on heavy oil and liquids-rich resource development; differentiation often hinges on basin-specific reservoir economics and grade/quality realization.
  • Whitecap Resources: emphasizes multi-basin light oil and liquids-rich opportunities; competitive outcomes depend on portfolio quality and infrastructure access across plays.
  • Harvest Operations: focused on Canadian resource plays with an emphasis on operational efficiency and development cadence; differentiation is driven by cost structure and reserve quality.
Focus contrast: While peers may compete across multiple basins and product mixes, Northern Oil and Gas’s positioning is anchored in delivering competitive economics within its chosen regional footprintβ€”where transportation and processing access can materially influence netback outcomes.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

A 5–10 year investment horizon in upstream typically depends less on β€œdemand growth” assumptions and more on whether the company can sustain value-accretive production and reserves through cycle conditions. The main drivers:
  • Resource development economics: scalable development plans, supported by cost discipline and well-level performance, can maintain production and reserve life through reinvestment.
  • Infrastructure-driven netback resilience: proximity to takeaway and processing reduces the risk of realization compression during periods when logistics become the binding constraint.
  • Capital efficiency and decline management: improved drilling cadence, tighter operating controls, and effective reservoir management can slow cash burn and improve per-dollar value creation.
  • Commodity mix optimization: meaningful NGL and crude exposure can help diversify cash flows across different pricing regimes, particularly when liquids and gas differentials move out of phase.
  • Regulatory adaptability: a proven ability to comply with evolving environmental requirements can reduce implementation risk and preserve operating continuity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price volatility: oil and gas cash flows are highly sensitive to global pricing and regional basis differentials.
  • Regulatory and fiscal changes: royalties, carbon policy implementation, flaring/venting rules, and environmental compliance can alter project economics.
  • Execution and capital intensity: upstream growth depends on continuous capital availability and effective drilling/completion execution; cost inflation can erode returns.
  • Operational risks: well performance variance, facility constraints, midstream outages, and drilling/well integrity issues can affect production continuity and costs.
  • Balance sheet and financing discipline: maintaining liquidity and manageable leverage is critical when commodity cycles tighten.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

In this sector, valuation is typically framed around cash-flow durability and net asset value quality rather than accounting earnings alone. Common market approaches include:
  • EV/EBITDAX and related cash flow multiples
  • Net asset value (NAV) / discounted cash flow analysis based on reserve value, operating costs, and assumed commodity curves
  • Cash flow yield relative to enterprise value, particularly under commodity sensitivity
Key drivers that move perceived value:
  • Operating cost position (sustaining and per-unit costs)
  • Realized price strength (differentials, takeaway reliability)
  • Reserve quality and replacement efficiency (how much value is created per investment dollar)
  • Balance sheet resilience (ability to fund development through cycle troughs)

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

Northern Oil and Gas’s long-term investment case rests on the ability to convert a regionally concentrated asset base into competitive netbacks through a combination of geographic cost advantage and logistical infrastructure connectivity, supported by repeatable execution that improves capital efficiency. The core question for durable shareholder value is whether management can sustain development returns and production continuity while navigating commodity volatility and evolving regulatory requirements.

⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"NOG reported Q1 2026 revenue of $544.1M, down -6.2% QoQ (from $580.3M in Q4 2025) and down -6.2% YoY (vs. $580.3M in Q1 2025). Net income was -$522.8M (EPS -$5.31), which deteriorated sharply QoQ from -$70.7M in Q4 2025 and YoY from +$139.0M in Q1 2025. Profitability contracted materially: gross margin fell to 32.9% from 21.3% in Q4 2025, but net margin swung to -96.1% (vs. -15.7% in Q4 2025), indicating heavy below-the-line pressure. Cash flow remained positive in the quarter, with operating cash flow of $323.6M and free cash flow of $323.6M (capex not reported/zero in this quarter). Liquidity weakened versus prior quarters: cash and equivalents increased to $37.0M from $14.3M QoQ, but declined from the $31.6M level seen in Q3 2025 and remains small relative to the balance-sheet debt load. Balance sheet leverage remains elevated with total assets of $5.51B and total equity of $1.78B, but net debt is still very high at ~$2.51B. Shareholder returns are mixed: price is $24.55 with only +7.1% 1Y change (below a momentum threshold). Dividend yield is ~1.5%, but the quarter’s losses imply dividend coverage is not well supported on an earnings basis."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue fell -6.2% QoQ (580.3Mβ†’544.1M) and -6.2% YoY (544.1M vs 580.3M in Q1’25), indicating a weakening top line.

Profitability

Neutral

Net margin collapsed to -96.1% in Q1 2026 from -15.7% in Q4 2025 and +23.9% in Q1 2025; EPS swung to -$5.31 from +$1.41 YoY. Despite higher gross margin vs Q4, below-the-line items drove net losses.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow stayed positive at $323.6M and free cash flow was also positive ($323.6M). However, reliance on cash generation without earnings support remains a risk given net losses.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Leverage remains high: total assets $5.51B; equity $1.78B; total debt ~$2.55B and net debt ~$2.51B. Liquidity is thin (cash ~$37M) and current ratio weakened to ~0.53.

Shareholder Returns

Caution

1Y price change is +7.1% (no strong momentum), and dividend yield is ~1.5%. Losses in the quarter reduce confidence in earnings-backed payout durability.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Street target consensus is $29 vs $24.55 current (~+18% implied upside). Valuation appears challenged on earnings (negative P/E), but targets suggest a recovery expectation.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So What? NOG delivered a steady Q1 operationally (148k+ BOE/d, +6% sequential) with Williston curtailment reversal and a record 41 ground-game deals supporting inventory growth. Financially, GAAP was distorted by very large noncash items: ~$521M derivative mark-to-market loss from Iran-driven oil spikes and a ~$268M full-cost impairment charge, though cash-hedge settlement losses were far smaller (~$17.6M). Guidance remains unchanged, reflecting commodity volatility, but management signaled they’re trending toward the high end of their low activity scenario and plan to narrow ranges by the Q2 call. The key forward catalyst is the longer-dated strip improvement (2027/2028) that should drive more sustained operator activity despite a spud-to-sales lag of ~150–160 days. Near-term headwind is Waha-linked Permian gas realizations (72% of benchmark in Q1; weak for a couple quarters), partially offset by basis hedges (Permian gas 53% or $1.86/Mcf on a hedged basis).

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Reversal of curtailments in the Williston driving better capital efficiency throughout 2026
  • Improvement in the 2027 and 2028 long-dated strip supporting growth in undeveloped activity and asset prices
  • 41 ground-game transactions in Q1 adding 5,100 net acres and 6 net wells; continuing quarterly record pace
  • Improving backlog in both size and quality supporting the business model and future activity

Business Development

  • Evaluating over $10 billion in assets across 8 transactions currently in the market (locations described broadly across multiple basins, with oil-weighted quality improving, especially in the Permian)
  • Closed a joint Utica acquisition during the quarter (referenced as already completed before quarter end)
  • Appalachian leasing program continued to expand across basins; 70+ net locations added over the last year (no named counterparties provided)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q1 total average daily production: over 148,000 BOE/day, up 6% sequentially; oil/gas held at ~50/50 with Appalachian JV well deliveries at peak
  • Noncash mark-to-market derivative loss: ~$521 million driven by oil price run-up during Iran war; hedges settled in the quarter only ~$17.6 million loss (includes ~$11 million gain on natural gas hedges offset by ~$28 million loss on oil hedges)
  • Noncash impairment charge: ~$268 million due to full cost accounting optics; management said if oil prices remain at current levels, this should be the last impairment charge for the year; evaluating potential shift to successful efforts longer term
  • Natural gas realizations: 72% of benchmark prices in Q1, reflecting Waha weakness from Permian takeaway constraints; Permian gas realizations expected weak for at least next couple of quarters until planned infrastructure comes online in back half of 2026
  • Differentials/hedge insulation: including Waha basis hedges, Permian gas realizations were 53% or $1.86/Mcf vs corporate gas realizations of -1% or -$0.02/Mcf
  • CapEx (excluding non-budgeted acquisitions and other): $270 million; 31% Permian, 27% Appalachia, 24% Williston, 17% Uinta
  • Organic development capital allocation: ~$227 million of the quarter’s spend; expected CapEx cadence: ~60/40 first half/second half subject to partner activity

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Debt well within comfort zone after closing joint Utica acquisition
  • Nearly $230 million equity offering completed late in Q1
  • Liquidity: over $1.2 billion available; additional $175 million untapped
  • Maturity wall addressed previously; management stated runway sufficient for years

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Ground-game leasing remains central; NOG proprietary infrastructure used to grow portfolio via smaller acquisitions and joint development opportunities
  • Large-sized M&A evaluation focused on resilient packages for any commodity environment; improved backlog quality and size
  • Hedge book: no major fireworks expected for 2026; planning focus is patience pending Middle East conclusion for 2027 hedging decisions

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • No 2026 guidance update due to commodity and macro volatility
  • Directionally trending toward higher end of the low activity scenario from prior quarter; management expects tightening and narrowing guidance by the Q2 call

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Non-stable commodity/differential environment tied to Iran-driven volatility; timing lag (operator spud-to-sales ~150–160 days) delays activity response
  • Waha market weakness and Permian takeaway constraints keep gas realizations weak; short-term downward pressure expected until Permian expansions progress
  • GAAP earnings optics from full cost method: large noncash impairment charges ($268 million) and derivative mark-to-market swings ($521 million)
  • Geopolitical-driven caution from operators creating slower adoption of increased activity despite higher long-dated pricing

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Sustainable activity trigger: Management said original guidance didn’t contemplate war; operator caution reflects spud-to-sales lag (~150–160 days) and reluctance to commit before resolution. They cited long-term strip as sufficient around ~$70 (2-year) and expects it to creep higher for comfort; guidance tightening by Q2.
  • Natural gas outlook and differentials: Management differentiated streams (NGL yield included). Appalachia benefited with tighter M2 basis and improving differentials; oil differentials improving materially while aggregate gas differentials worsen, driven by Waha. They noted ~4 Bcf/day Permian expansions ongoing, implying improvement later in 2026.
  • Hedge book accounting and swaption classification: Management clarified accounting mechanics: swaptions expiring 12/31/2026 must be classified current due to expiry/counterparty election timing, even if economically rolling into later-year swaps. They emphasized active hedge management and called it β€œnothing burger,” with updated disclosures in filings.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the NOG Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) Financial Profile