Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) Market Cap

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of $4.31B.

Price: $86.03

0.12 (0.14%)

Market Cap: 4.31B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: William Monteleone

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

IPO Date: 2012-09-05

Website: https://www.parpacific.com

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) - Company Information

Market Cap: 4.31B|Sector: Energy

Company Profile

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is an integrated energy and infrastructure company, managing diverse operations across three key divisions: Refining, Retail, and Logistics. Its Refining segment oversees three facilities that produce a variety of refined petroleum products, including ultra-low sulfur diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, marine fuel, distillates, asphalt, and low sulfur fuel oil. These outputs primarily supply markets in Hawaii, the Pacific Northwest, Wyoming, and South Dakota. The Retail division manages 119 fuel and convenience store locations. In Hawaii, these operate under the Hele, 76, and nomnom banners, offering both fuel and merchandise such as beverages, prepared foods, and other general sundries. Similar retail fuel and convenience offerings are provided in Washington and Idaho through locations branded Cenex, nomnom, and Zip Trip. The Logistics segment operates an extensive network for the distribution of refined products, comprising terminals, pipelines, a single point mooring system, and trucking services across Oahu, Maui, Hawaii, Molokai, and Kauai. This segment also includes leased marine vessels; a crude oil pipeline gathering system, a refined products pipeline, storage facilities, and loading racks in Wyoming; and a jet fuel storage facility and pipeline serving Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota. Additionally, it features a marine terminal, a unit train-capable rail loading terminal, storage facilities, a truck rack, and a proprietary pipeline serving Joint Base Lewis McChord. Established in 1984, the company was formerly known as Par Petroleum Corporation, rebranding to Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. in October 2015. Its corporate headquarters are situated in Houston, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

68%
Buy

From 7 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $78.80

▼ -8.4% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$65

Median

$80

High Bound

$92

Average

$79

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$78.80
▼ -8.40% Upside
Low Target
$65.00
-24% Risk
Median Target
$80.00
-7% Mid
High Target
$92.00
7% Max
Consensus
Buy
13 / 17 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)4,3143,0321,7891,8031,3367679069811,448
Enterprise Value ($M)5,7854,5032,8513,2982,7442,2652,2812,3002,699
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)9.4313.985.741.675.62-6.25-4.0633.8519.17
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)24.120.270.665.4010.36
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.571.660.990.900.710.440.490.460.72
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)2.752.001.181.291.160.690.760.781.14
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)27.67-14.4710.3616.7915.64-18.11-14.3419.56-34.84
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)2.471.571.641.451.301.241.071.34
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)7.6158.4719.148.2220.60107.12-143.4133.2234.65
Debt to Equity Ratio1.941.080.811.191.371.471.321.201.13

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC (PARR) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

PAR Pacific Holdings operates in the downstream energy value chain, converting crude oil into refined products and distributing them through a logistics network that supports both wholesale and retail sales. The business links (1) refinery sourcing and production, (2) inventory management and product marketing, and (3) distribution capacity that helps move output into markets where supply can be constrained by geography and infrastructure.

In structurally “import- or transport-dependent” regions, the combination of refining scale, routing flexibility, and distribution infrastructure matters as much as headline refining capacity. That model tends to translate operational execution (utilization, product yields, maintenance discipline) into cash flow resilience even when industry margins swing.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

  • Refined product sales (wholesale/marketing): Predominantly transactional revenue tied to product pricing and refinery output.
  • Retail fuels and related offerings: More frequent transactions and local customer visibility; margins depend on the retail competitive set and wholesale input costs.
  • Logistics and distribution-related contributions: Revenue streams that benefit from an integrated supply chain (terminals/distribution capacity) where fees and throughput economics can be less correlated to spot wholesale pricing.

Margin drivers typically include refining yield quality (what portion of input converts into higher-value product categories), purchased crude and feedstock differentials, operating efficiency, transportation and distribution economics, and the ability to manage working capital through disciplined inventory and sales timing.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

PAR Pacific’s primary moat is best described as a geographic cost advantage supported by logistical infrastructure. While refiners as a group face cyclical crack spreads, competitors do not easily replicate the same cost position in constrained end-markets.

  • Low-cost feedstock access & optimization: Refiners with strong procurement and operating flexibility can capture better crude/product economics across different market conditions.
  • Logistical infrastructure as an execution lever: Integrated distribution capacity reduces transportation friction and supports reliability of supply to end markets that are costly or slow to serve from alternatives.
  • Geographic constraints as a demand stabilizer: In markets with limited local supply and higher import/transport costs, customers and commercial offtakers value dependable supply—raising the effective difficulty of substituting away from an established local operator.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Valero Energy, Marathon Petroleum, and Phillips 66: These are large, broadly diversified U.S. refiners with scale benefits across multiple regions. Their advantage is throughput and portfolio flexibility across major refining hubs.
  • PAR Pacific’s focus: PAR concentrates more of its economics in geographies where logistics and supply chain reliability can materially influence delivered costs and service levels, rather than competing purely on refinery scale in the largest Gulf Coast basins.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Through-cycle operational excellence: Sustained utilization, maintenance discipline, and yield optimization can compound value across the refinery cycle.
  • Rational logistics deployment: Additional throughput, better routing, and improved distribution economics can raise effective realized margins without requiring proportional new refining capacity.
  • Capital efficiency from targeted investments: Downstream operators that direct capital toward bottlenecks (reliability, debottlenecking, storage, distribution capability) can improve returns even when industry growth is modest.
  • Energy transition “demand for deliverable fuels”: Near- to mid-term refined product demand remains supported by the need for transportation fuels and specialty products, while blending/grade requirements increase the value of operational flexibility.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Refining cycle sensitivity: Cash flow depends on crack spreads, product pricing differentials, and feedstock costs—industry margins can compress.
  • Maintenance and operational disruption: Turnarounds, unplanned outages, and asset integrity issues can impair utilization and reduce yields.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance: Emissions rules, product specification requirements, and permitting constraints can increase sustaining capex and operating costs.
  • Geopolitical and logistics shocks: Disruptions in supply routing, shipping costs, and infrastructure constraints can affect landed costs and delivery economics.
  • Working capital swings: Inventory and receivables/payables dynamics can influence liquidity during volatile commodity periods.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values downstream energy businesses on enterprise value relative to cash-generating capacity, with emphasis on segment cash flow and EV/EBITDA-like frameworks rather than pure balance-sheet metrics. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Refining margin outlook (crack spread environment and product yield profile)
  • Utilization and reliability (how consistently the assets convert inputs into sellable products)
  • Sustaining vs. growth capex intensity and compliance-related spend
  • Logistics economics (throughput, fee/handling contribution, and delivered-cost advantage)
  • Risk-adjusted leverage and liquidity given cyclical earnings volatility

🔍 Investment Takeaway

PAR Pacific’s long-term investment case rests on a geographic cost-and-logistics advantage that supports resilient realized margins versus commodity-only peers. The durability of the thesis hinges on operational execution (utilization, yields, maintenance discipline) and continued ability to defend delivered-cost economics in end-markets where supply alternatives face structural transport and infrastructure frictions.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for PARR.

fool.com2026-07-30

Vanguard Energy vs. SPDR Oil & Gas Exploration: Which ETF Suits Your Portfolio Best?

VDE's broader portfolio and lower costs deliver superior five-year returns, but XOP's equal-weight strategy may appeal to investors seeking concentrated upstream exposure.

zacks.com2026-07-29

Par Petroleum (PARR) Is Up 1.50% in One Week: What You Should Know

Does Par Petroleum (PARR) have what it takes to be a top stock pick for momentum investors? Let's find out.

defenseworld.net2026-07-29

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP Sells 9,798 Shares of Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. $PARR

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP lowered its position in Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PARR) by 0.6% in the undefined quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm owned 1,764,823 shares of the company's stock after selling 9,798 shares during the period. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

zacks.com2026-07-28

Par Petroleum (PARR) Reports Next Week: Wall Street Expects Earnings Growth

Par Petroleum (PARR) doesn't possess the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

zacks.com2026-07-27

5 Broker-Adored Stocks to Buy Amid Middle East Crisis Resolution Hopes

Delek US, Par Pacific, PBF Energy, ZIM Integrated and Nabors emerge as broker favorites amid oil-price swings and hopes for a U.S.-Iran diplomatic resolution.

zacks.com2026-07-23

Par Petroleum (PARR) is a Top-Ranked Momentum Stock: Should You Buy?

The Zacks Style Scores offers investors a way to easily find top-rated stocks based on their investing style. Here's why you should take advantage.

zacks.com2026-07-22

Pick These 5 Low Price-to-Sales Stocks to Help Boost Portfolio Returns

CAL, PEB, BCC, APLE and PARR combine low price-to-sales ratios with strong fundamentals, disciplined execution and long-term growth drivers.

zacks.com2026-07-22

Is Par Pacific (PARR) Stock Outpacing Its Oils-Energy Peers This Year?

Here is how Par Petroleum (PARR) and Venture Global (VG) have performed compared to their sector so far this year.

zacks.com2026-07-21

5 Value Stocks With Impressive EV-to-EBITDA Ratios to Own Now

CLDT, PARR, ARCO, CAL and FUL stand out with attractive EV-to-EBITDA ratios and strong earnings outlook.

zacks.com2026-07-20

Should Value Investors Buy Par Pacific (PARR) Stock?

Here at Zacks, our focus is on the proven Zacks Rank system, which emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find great stocks. Nevertheless, we are always paying attention to the latest value, growth, and momentum trends to underscore strong picks.

zacks.com2026-07-17

5 Top Stocks With Relative Price Strength to Buy Right Now

JBHT, PGNY, BSET, VSXY and PARR stand out for relative price strength, positive estimate revisions and solid fundamentals amid market uncertainty.

globenewswire.com2026-07-13

Par Pacific Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release and Conference Call Schedule

HOUSTON, July 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PARR) (“Par Pacific”) today announced that it will release its second quarter 2026 results after the New York Stock Exchange closes on Tuesday, August 4, 2026. This release will be followed by a conference call for investors on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (10:00 a.m. Eastern). The full text of the release will be available on Par Pacific's website at http://www.parpacific.com.

zacks.com2026-07-13

Renewed Middle East Tensions Threaten Supply: 3 Energy Stocks to Watch

Renewed Middle East tensions tighten refined product markets, putting Valero Energy, Phillips 66 and Par Pacific in focus as refining margins climb.

zacks.com2026-07-13

Are You Looking for a Top Momentum Pick? Why Par Petroleum (PARR) is a Great Choice

Does Par Petroleum (PARR) have what it takes to be a top stock pick for momentum investors? Let's find out.

zacks.com2026-07-13

Don't Miss These 2 Energy Stocks Before Q2 Earnings Season Kicks Off

Par Pacific and Patterson-UTI enter Q2 earnings season with support from favorable refining and drilling trends.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"PARR reported Q1 2026 revenue of $1.8238B and net income of $54.5M (EPS not provided). On a YoY basis, revenue increased 4.6% vs Q1 2025 ($1.7450B) and net income improved from a net loss of $(30.4)M to +$54.5M, a swing of +$84.9M. QoQ, revenue was essentially flat (-0.6% vs Q4 2025), while net income declined from $77.7M to $54.5M (-29.9%). Profitability is choppy across quarters: gross margin fell to 14.5% from 21.0% in Q4 2025 and also below Q3 2025 (27.8%). Operating income dropped to $65.3M (margin 3.6%) from $99.3M (5.5%) in Q4, reflecting margin contraction. Despite this, the company returned to positive earnings YoY. Cash flow data for Q1 2026 is missing/zeroed (operating cash flow and free cash flow shown as 0), so cash flow quality cannot be validated for the quarter. Balance sheet resilience remains mixed: total assets appear only $172.2M in Q1 2026, with $151.6M equity and no reported debt—this is inconsistent with prior quarters (assets ~ $3.9–$4.1B), so leverage and asset trend should be interpreted cautiously. Total shareholder returns look strong: the stock is up 356.1% over 1 year, indicating strong capital appreciation. No dividends or buyback activity is reported in Q1 2026."

Revenue Growth

Positive

YoY revenue +4.6% (Q1 2026: $1.8238B vs $1.7450B). QoQ revenue roughly flat -0.6% (vs Q4 2025 $1.8132B), indicating no clear sequential acceleration.

Profitability

Fair

Net income improved YoY from -$30.4M to +$54.5M (large earnings swing). However, QoQ net income fell -29.9% and margins contracted: gross margin 14.5% vs 21.0% in Q4 2025; operating margin 3.6% vs 5.5%.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Q1 2026 cash flow fields are shown as 0 (operating cash flow and free cash flow not reliable), so cash conversion/quality for the quarter cannot be assessed. Prior quarters showed positive OCF (e.g., Q4 2025 OCF $200.2M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Q1 2026 balance sheet appears to show much lower total assets ($172.2M) and no debt, versus ~$3.9–$4.1B assets and significant debt in prior quarters—this suggests data/format issues. Equity is reported as $151.6M, but trend confidence is limited.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong capital appreciation: 1-year price change +356.1%. Dividend and buyback activity are not indicated for Q1 2026, so total return appears driven primarily by price momentum.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Street consensus target is $61.6 vs current price $57.33 (moderate upside). With the stock up sharply over the past year, valuation may be demanding despite the positive earnings trajectory YoY.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So What?: Q1 performance was strong despite commodity/lag effects: adjusted EBITDA was $91M and adjusted EPS $0.78, aided by record throughput and favorable refining cracks (Singapore 3-1-2 materially above 2025 norms). However, the key investor tension is Hawaii capture—reported at 42% in Q1 due to a ~$125M net price lag, and normalized to 92% still below the management target of >105%. Management tied the remaining gap to West Coast pricing flipping to a discount vs Singapore and to secondary-product netbacks (naphtha/LPG) lagging when jet/gas oil premiums spike. For Q2, they guided throughput ranges (system midpoint 182 kbpd), $42/bbl refining index, and $4–$5/bbl Hawaii crude differential, with Hawaii turnaround mostly pushing into Q3. Renewables is progressing (on-spec renewable diesel, SAF mode validation), but Q2 earnings are expected modest. Buybacks continued ($28M), governed by intrinsic-value discounts and capital excess, not simply free cash flow volume.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Successful early commissioning: pretreatment unit online in Hawaii; on-spec renewable diesel achieved in late April
  • Transitioning Hawaii renewable fuels operations to validate sustainable aviation fuel mode
  • System operational excellence: record first-quarter throughput enabling prebuilt inventory ahead of planned maintenance outages
  • Renewables unit start-up milestone in Hawaii Renewables Unit; testing/optimization plus establishing credit pathways

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Q1 adjusted EBITDA: $91M; Q1 adjusted net income: $0.78/share
    • Singapore 3-1-2 averaged >$72/bbl in April (materially above 2025 average $16/bbl); supported favorable refining economics
    • No crack spread hedges in place (management emphasized ability to capture strong market environment)
    • Hawaii capture: 42% reported in Q1 (includes ~10-15% of operational headwinds plus ~$125M net price lag headwind); normalized Hawaii capture: 92% after adjusting for lag
    • Montana margin capture: 143% vs reported index; Wyoming margin capture: 139% including $18M FIFO benefit; Washington margin capture: 100% supported by jet/diesel spreads
    • RINs: excess position at quarter-end; monetized <half of RINs tied to prior small refinery exemptions; Q1 includes full RIN expense at current market prices; GAAP included ~+$30M gain from RIN mark-to-market/book-value difference
    • Cash flow: Q1 cash from operations $162M excluding working-capital outflows of $185M and deferred turnaround costs of $18M (working capital driven by higher inventory/flat price environment ahead of April maintenance)

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Share repurchase: $28M during quarter at average $38/share
    • Since inception: repurchased >14M shares (~20% of shares outstanding) at average price $25/share
    • Liquidity: $938M total liquidity
    • Debt: gross term debt $638M at quarter end; stated remaining below low end of leverage targets

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Outage execution: Wyoming and Montana April outages completed on time; Washington February turnaround completed; Washington restarted and operating at maximum rates
    • Maintenance sequencing: Hawaii turnaround planned to begin late June, expected 30-45 days; renewable fuels unit off-line during turnaround
    • Operational ramp: Hawaii throughput expected 77,000–81,000 bpd in Q2 (turnaround impacts); record Q1 throughput (90,000 bpd Hawaii; 57,000 bpd Montana; 15,000 bpd Wyoming; 23,000 bpd Washington)
    • Renewables: pretreatment in tandem with renewable hydro treater; on-spec renewable diesel achieved; moving to validate SAF mode; Q2 renewables earnings contribution expected modest with more meaningful ramp in back half of year

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Q2 system-wide midpoint throughput: 182,000 bpd (Hawaii 77,000–81,000; Washington 40,000–42,000; Wyoming 14,000–16,000; Montana 45,000–49,000)
    • Q2 April consolidated refining index averaged $42/bbl (up ~$23/bbl vs Q1); April inland indices up ~$17/bbl vs Q1
    • Hawaii crude differential for Q2 expected $4 to $5/bbl (extended crude supply chain from early-year prebuilds)
    • Impact of upcoming Hawaii turnaround expected limited in Q2; most impact shifts into Q3
    • Hawaii turnaround start timing: planned end of June start-up (limited flexibility; tied to hydrocracker catalyst life ~6-year cycle)

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Hawaii net price lag headwind: ~$125M in Q1 due to sharp increase in refined product prices in March; lag reverses only if Singapore prices stabilize/decline into June
    • Hawaii capture below target: adjusted capture low-90% range vs management target >105%, driven by (1) West Coast pricing flipping from premium to discount vs Singapore (LA jet/diesel) and (2) premium blowout in gas oil/jet vs secondary products (naphtha/LPG), despite contractual West Coast exposure
    • Retail: Q1 same-store fuel sales -3.3% and in-store sales -1% vs Q1 2025; attributed to higher flat prices and impact of three state-level closures from Hawaii flooding events
    • RIN monetization uncertainty: management wants EPA clarity on 2025 exemptions before further monetizing historical excess and any new relief
    • Operational constraint: turnaround timing flexibility limited due to supply chain and contractor scheduling plus hydrocracker catalyst life considerations
    • Macro/commodity volatility: management highlighted extreme crack environments and potential for regional arbitrage tightening as freight normalizes

    Q&A: Analyst Interest

    • Topic: Jet yield economics and market drivers: Management confirmed ~15% jet yield as reasonable and emphasized incentive to maximize jet yields in the Pacific given jet vs ULSD spreads. They cited strong jet/gas-oil spread (hard molecule) and disruption/backfill dynamics from Persian Gulf export reductions feeding Asia and India needs.
    • Topic: Hawaii capture miss vs >105% target: Management attributed additional 10%–15% capture headwinds (besides net price lag) to (1) West Coast prices turning a discount to Singapore (contractual exposure) and (2) jet/gas oil premium blowouts depressing secondary product netbacks. They said these normalized into Q2 with West Coast expected premium vs Singapore, but volatility remains.
    • Topic: Throughput guidance conservatism vs outage start timing: Management said Hawaii Q2 throughput guidance reflects estimated outage start time and “optimizing crude supply chain” around turnaround. They declined to quantify landed crude differential changes until later (Q3), noting risk management keeps loading/delivery exposures away from extreme hoarding/forward backwardation impacts.
    • Topic: Share repurchase cadence relative to free cash flow: Management reiterated the “historical framework” and opportunistic approach based on excess capital outlook and intrinsic value vs market price. They said repurchase should be more aggressive when stock trades materially below intrinsic value and more moderate when discounts narrow, not simply tied to near-term 2Q cash generation.

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the PARR Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

    Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for PARR.

    SEC EDGAR Live Feed
    Loading financial data and tables...
    📁

    SEC Filings (PARR)

    © 2026 Stock Market Info — Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) Financial Profile