Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) Market Cap

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Thomas Jeremiah Baltimore Jr.

Sector: Real Estate

Industry: REIT - Hotel & Motel

IPO Date: 2017-01-04

Website: https://www.pkhotelsandresorts.com

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Real Estate

Company Profile

Park is the second largest publicly traded lodging REIT with a diverse portfolio of market-leading hotels and resorts with significant underlying real estate value. Park's portfolio currently consists of 60 premium-branded hotels and resorts with over 33,000 rooms primarily located in prime city center and resort locations.

Analyst Sentiment

54%
Hold

From 19 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $11.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$10

Median

$11

High Bound

$12

Average

$11

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$11.00
▼ -21.71% Upside
Low Target
$10.00
-29% Risk
Median Target
$11.00
-22% Mid
High Target
$12.00
-15% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 PARK HOTELS RESORTS INC (PK) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is a lodging real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns a portfolio of destination-oriented hotels and resorts. The economics are primarily delivered through long-lived property ownership paired with structured relationships to hotel operators. In practice, the value chain runs from (1) asset ownership of real estate and related improvements, to (2) leasing arrangements with operating partners that monetize room revenue and ancillary spend, and then to (3) Park receiving lease rent that typically combines fixed components and, where applicable, variable components tied to hotel performance.

This structure creates a “cash flow pass-through with partial operating leverage” profile: Park participates in property-level revenue outcomes while transferring day-to-day operations (marketing, staffing, management systems, reservations execution) to experienced hospitality operators.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is driven by lease-based rent tied to the leased properties. The monetisation model generally blends:

  • Base rent / contractual rent: provides a stabilizing foundation and supports predictability of cash flow.
  • Performance-based rent (where present): introduces upside when operating performance improves, aligning tenant incentives with property revenue growth.
  • Supplemental charges (where applicable): can flow through certain costs or arrangements, depending on lease terms.

Margin drivers in lodging REITs are less about operating expense control (often managed by tenants) and more about (1) property-level revenue generation, (2) lease terms (the mix of fixed versus variable rent), and (3) asset-level capital discipline that preserves earning power over time.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Park’s defensibility is anchored less in “brand switching” and more in hard-to-replicate real estate scarcity—a form of intangible asset rooted in location, site-specific attributes, and the practical difficulty of building comparable resort capacity in desirable demand nodes.

  • Intangible Asset Moat (Location & Destination Economics): Competitors cannot easily recreate the same combination of land scarcity, zoning/permitting realities, and destination demand draw. These assets retain long-run earning potential relative to generic lodging sites.
  • Tenant Relationship / Lease-Structure Stickiness (Soft Switching Costs): Operating partners benefit from proven destination assets and established lease arrangements. Switching to alternative properties generally involves relocation costs, repositioning risk, and relationship/lease renegotiation dynamics—creating friction for tenants.
  • Capital-Access Cost Advantages (REIT financing discipline): REIT structure can support ongoing capital market access; disciplined refinancing and asset management can lower the effective cost of capital versus less specialized real estate owners.

Competitive benchmarking: Primary peers in hotel lodging REITs include Host Hotels & Resorts, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, and Apple Hospitality REIT. These firms also own and monetize hotel real estate, but their portfolios differ in property mix (market type, destination versus urban exposure, and geographic allocation).

Park’s positioning emphasizes resort/destination characteristics, which typically translate into demand drivers tied to travel patterns and leisure activity rather than purely business transient demand. That focus can change the risk/return profile versus peers with heavier exposure to convention/business hubs.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, Park’s growth should be supported by a combination of lodging demand normalization and asset-level compounding effects:

  • Structural travel demand growth: Expanded leisure travel participation and longer-stay destination behavior can support room revenue and occupancy cycles.
  • Supply discipline in desirable resort nodes: Building comparable resort inventory is constrained by land availability, permitting complexity, and development risk, which can help stabilize long-run supply growth in prime locations.
  • Portfolio-level rent resilience via lease structure: Where lease terms include performance-based elements, improving hotel economics can translate into rent growth without Park directly managing operations.
  • Asset modernization and capital targeting: Renovation and capex that preserve guest appeal can support ADR and retention, improving the property’s long-run cash flow capacity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Capital intensity and property-level impairment risk: Hotels are operationally and physically complex assets; major capex needs can pressure cash flow and/or require debt refinancing.
  • Lease rollover and counterparty risk: Tenant credit quality, lease expirations, and renegotiations can materially affect contractual cash flows.
  • Interest rate and refinancing risk: REIT cash flows are sensitive to the cost and availability of debt, especially when maturities and the refinancing calendar become unfavorable.
  • Demand cyclicality: Lodging performance can decline in economic downturns, shifting negotiating leverage toward tenants during renegotiations.
  • Regulatory and environmental considerations: Zoning, permitting, labor requirements, and environmental liabilities can increase costs or limit redevelopment flexibility.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Hotel lodging REITs are typically valued using cash flow-based metrics rather than purely earnings multiples. Market participants often anchor on FFO/AFFO and EV/EBITDA-type frameworks, with additional focus on:

  • Rent durability: the proportion of fixed versus variable rent and the credit quality of operating partners.
  • Interest coverage and debt maturity profile: the ability to maintain distributions through varying rate environments.
  • Same-asset NOI trajectory and capex intensity: whether asset maintenance supports or erodes future cash flows.
  • Liquidity and capital market access: refinancing optionality can change the downside of valuation drawdowns.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Park Hotels & Resorts presents a lodging REIT thesis centered on destination real estate scarcity and lease-structured cash flow participation rather than operational execution. The investment case rests on the durability of prime resort locations, the stickiness embedded in lease relationships, and disciplined capital management that preserves long-term earning power. Key diligence areas include lease term structure, tenant credit quality, property capex requirements, and the company’s debt and refinancing resilience across rate cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"PK posted a sharp Q1 2026 rebound with Revenue of $622m and Net Income of $11m (EPS $0.05), reversing losses seen in prior quarters. QoQ, revenue edged down from $629m (Q4 2025) to $622m (-1.1% QoQ) while net income swung from a -$205m loss to +$11m (improvement of $216m). YoY, revenue fell slightly from $630m (Q1 2025) to $622m (-1.3% YoY), but net income improved materially from -$57m to +$11m (an improvement of +$68m YoY). Profitability improved: operating margin rose to 9.97% from 1.11% in Q1 2025 and moved materially higher than Q4 2025’s operating margin (15.10%) but with far better bottom-line outcome versus the prior loss-making quarter; net margin improved to 1.77% from -9.05% YoY. Cash flow supported the turnaround. Operating cash flow was $59m in Q1 2026, and free cash flow was $59m (capex reported as $0). Dividends paid were -$50m, indicating an ongoing cash return policy. Balance sheet resilience improved versus the prior quarter: total assets were steady at ~$7.66b, but cash declined to $156m from $232m and net debt decreased to ~$51m (from ~$4.03b reported in Q4 2025), implying leverage metrics have materially improved or classification effects occurred. Total shareholder return appears solid with a +19.48% 1-year price change; while not above 20%, momentum remains supportive. Analyst consensus valuation (target ~$11.5) is roughly in-line with the $11.41 current price."

Revenue Growth

Fair

Revenue was down -1.1% QoQ ($629m to $622m) and -1.3% YoY ($630m to $622m). Trend is stable-to-slightly negative.

Profitability

Positive

Net income improved to +$11m from -$205m QoQ and from -$57m YoY. Net margin turned positive to 1.77% from -9.05% YoY; operating margin improved materially versus Q1 2025.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Q1 2026 operating cash flow was $59m and free cash flow was $59m. Dividends paid were -$50m; payout is heavy (payout ratio ~4.55 on reported earnings), but coverage is supported by positive free cash flow in the quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were roughly flat at ~$7.66b vs ~$7.70b prior quarter. Net debt dropped sharply to ~$51m from ~$4.03b in Q4 2025; liquidity (cash) declined to $156m from $232m, so resilience appears improved but should be validated.

Shareholder Returns

Positive

Share price is up +19.48% over 1 year (near but below the >20% momentum threshold). Dividend yield is ~2.39% (per provided ratios), supporting total return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target of ~$11.5 vs current ~$11.41 implies near-term valuation is roughly fair value with limited upside from targets alone.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

PK delivered strong Q1 operating momentum with RevPAR +5.5% YoY excluding Royal Palm (and ~6% ex-storm-adjusted Hawaii), supported by leisure strength and better-than-expected group. Management highlighted clear renovation-driven value creation (Bonnet Creek exceeding projections materially; Hawaii demand rebounding post-tower refurbishments) while simultaneously executing capital recycling. The main near-term overhang is transitional performance drag from Royal Palm South Beach, with Q2 forecasting nearly a $3M loss and an implied assumption of no Miami contribution in current guidance, despite an early-June completion target. Balance-sheet actions are a second major positive: Bonnet Creek refinancing and subsequent repayment steps are designed to remove a November 2026 maturity burden and meaningfully reduce near-term maturities, with an estimated ~$28M annualized interest headwind. Guidance was modestly raised (RevPAR growth +50 bps at the midpoint), but management emphasized geopolitical and oil-price uncertainty as the key external risk to demand cadence.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Royal Palm South Beach transformation: target substantially complete by early June; stocking/training mid-May; target public occupancy mid-June; guidance currently assumes no Miami contribution
  • Bonnet Creek outperformance: ~16% RevPAR growth and 20% hotel adjusted EBITDA increase; trailing-twelve-month EBITDA >$103M (~60% above pre-renovation) and ~$20M (24%) above projections
  • Hawaii rebound post-room renovations: combined RevPAR +2% across Rainbow Tower/Palace Tower; ~5.4% when adjusting for 340 bps storm drag; expectations to perform at upper end of guidance

Business Development

  • Named financings/relationships: bank group support for Bonnet Creek and corporate refinancing; Davidson lead operator on-site at Royal Palm since construction launch (May 2025)
  • Equipment/partners on Royal Palm: design & construction team led by Carl Mayfield; active owners’ reps/general contractor/subs and operations teams on-site (417 personnel as of call date)
  • Airline/contract expansion: Waikoloa Village growth attributed to an expanded airline contract

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • RevPAR +5.5% YoY excluding Royal Palm; RevPAR ex-Royal Palm +6.5% January, ~3.5% February, nearly 6.5% March
  • Core RevPAR +5.4% excluding Royal Palm; Royal Palm represented ~400 bps drag on core results
  • Total hotel revenues $591M (+~2%); hotel adjusted EBITDA $152M with ~26% margin; EBITDA $143M and adjusted FFO per share $0.45 (ahead of expectations per management)
  • Q1 comparability headwinds: 170 bps drag from Hilton New Orleans Riverside lapping Super Bowl; D.C. hotel comparisons after presidential inauguration
  • Expense/guidance drivers: expense expectations moved up ~40 bps vs prior guidance; cost per occupied room grew ~50 bps; extra occupancy drove higher-than-expected expense growth
  • Group trends: portfolio group revenue +5% YoY excluding Royal Palm; >180 bps improvement in group revenue pace since last quarter; 2027 group pace currently up 5.5% (includes Hawaii and Royal Palm)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Liquidity ~ $2B at quarter end: $156M cash plus $1.8B available under $1B revolver and $800M delayed draw term loan
  • Debt/maturities actions: raised $700M floating-rate delayed draw mortgage on Bonnet Creek (upsized +$50M; close expected this week); SOFR +225 bps
  • Planned draws/repays: partial draw in June to repay $121M Hyatt Regency mortgage (July maturity); draw remaining capacity in September and fully draw Bonnet Creek proceeds to repay $1.275B CMBS on Hilton Hawaiian Village (matures early November)
  • Annualized interest expense increase expected: ~$28M; ~$13M reflected in 2026 AFFO guidance based on timing
  • Dividend: paid $0.25/share for Q1 on Apr 15; Board approved $0.25/share for Q2 payable Jul 15 (record June 30); annualized yield ~9% at recent trading levels
  • Noncore asset monetization: Hilton Seattle Airport sold for $18M (396-room, short-term ground lease); total noncore sales for the year $31M (~16x 2025 EBITDA) with nearly $36M expected CapEx for both properties

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Capital recycling: continued disposition of noncore assets while reinvesting in core; sold/disposed of 52 hotels for >$3B over last nine years
  • Noncore overhang management: remaining 12 noncore assets include 3 tied to dispute with Safehold; remaining nine assets ~ $41M EBITDA with ~45% tied to one Florida asset; management expects lumpiness/choppiness as sales progress
  • Operational disruption planning: Royal Palm remains a partial drag in Q2 while staffing ramps and demand rebuilds through Q3; forecast nearly $3M loss in Q2 and quick ramp in back half of year
  • Renovation progress: completed Phase 2 guest room renovations at Rainbow Tower and Palace Tower; total Phase Two investment across both Hawaii properties ~ $85M
  • Ongoing renovation pipeline: Hilton New Orleans Riverside Phase 3 scheduled for completion in Q4 2026; Alethe Tower renovation launch at Hilton Hawaiian Village encompasses 351 rooms and project total ~ $96M

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 outlook: expect Q2 RevPAR around midpoint of guidance range with ~100 bps drag from Miami; Miami remains a ~partial drag as Royal Palm ramps
  • April RevPAR expected flat; up ~3% excluding Miami, led by Hawaii, Bonnet Creek, and Key West plus spring break leisure transient strength in Santa Barbara
  • May expected to modestly soften; June expected strong with group demand up nearly 10% and favorable YoY comps in Hawaii, Orlando, Key West, and New York
  • Year guidance update (midpoint): increase RevPAR growth by 50 bps to new range 0.5% to 2.5%; adjusted EBITDA guidance up $7M at midpoint to $587M to $617M; AFFO per share midpoint +$0.01 to $1.74 to $1.90
  • Hawaii framing: management expects Hawaii to trend toward upper end of its range; referenced as ~2.5% (management described as ‘upper end’)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Geopolitical tensions (Middle East) could impact consumer discretionary spending and business investment sentiment; management called for a measured approach
  • Potential higher oil prices could pressure both business and leisure travel and drive airline/fuel economics uncertainty
  • Hawaii-specific external headwinds: conflict impacts fuel/fuel surcharges; strong USD vs JPY; cheaper alternatives; management described these as current headwinds
  • Noncore disposition process friction: market challenging and last-mile sales are difficult; some assets overhung by legal/dispute timing (Safehold) and short-term ground lease/JV/other complications
  • Royal Palm timing risk: guidance conservatively assumes no Miami contribution at this time despite target opening timing (inspection/regulatory complexity)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Disposition: Status, market pushback, and valuation discipline. Management explained the remaining 12 noncore assets (33 total assets now; 52 sold/disposed >$3B). Three involve Safehold dispute; remaining nine are ~4.1% of EBITDA with 45% tied to one Florida asset; they aim to sell quickly without ‘last dollar’ holdout.
  • World Cup timing vs Royal Palm opening. Management detailed Royal Palm’s 393-key expansion to 404 with ~$112M investment, site resourcing (417 on-site) and schedule: substantially complete early June; stocking/training mid-May; public occupancy targeted mid-June. Guidance assumes no Miami contribution; they cited July 11 and July 18 as key match dates and said they’re cautiously optimistic.
  • Hawaii recovery building blocks and cadence back to pre-strike levels. Management cited historical Oahu RevPAR outperformance (~120 bps vs U.S.), limited supply growth through 2030, and the investment/repositioning at Hilton Hawaiian Village (80% rooms renovated after Elihi Tower). They noted Japanese visitation shift (750K vs 1.5M historically), convention center completion as a tailwind, but near-term conflict/fuel and USD headwinds.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the PK Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) Financial Profile