Park Aerospace Corp.

Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) Market Cap

Park Aerospace Corp. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Brian E. Shore

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Aerospace & Defense

IPO Date: 1980-03-17

Website: https://www.parkaerospace.com

Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) is a manufacturer and innovator of advanced composite materials. Utilizing both solution and hot-melt processes, the company crafts these materials into composite structures primarily for the aerospace market, serving clients across North America, Asia, and Europe. Its portfolio of advanced composites features critical products such as film adhesives and lightning strike protection materials. These are essential for fabricating both primary and secondary structural components found in diverse aircraft types, including jet engines, large and regional airliners, military aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), business jets, general aviation planes, and rotary-wing aircraft. Additionally, PKE provides specialized ablative materials for rocket motors and nozzles, alongside custom-engineered solutions for radome applications. The company also offers design and fabrication services for composite parts, assemblies, and structures, as well as low-volume tooling solutions for the aerospace sector. Founded in 1954 and based in Westbury, New York, the organization was previously known as Park Electrochemical Corp. before adopting its current name, Park Aerospace Corp., in July 2019.

Analyst Sentiment

100%
Strong Buy

From 2 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $43.00

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$43

Median

$43

High Bound

$43

Average

$43

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$43.00
▲ +26.84% Upside
Low Target
$43.00
27% Risk
Median Target
$43.00
27% Mid
High Target
$43.00
27% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 PARK AEROSPACE CORP (PKE) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

PARK AEROSPACE CORP operates in the aircraft components and maintenance ecosystem, with a focus on supplying and supporting critical, safety-related parts used across commercial and defense aviation. The company’s value chain centers on (1) manufacturing or supplying aircraft components, and (2) extending that supply through an aftermarket support model—repair, overhaul, and replacement tied to an aircraft’s operational lifecycle.

This structure creates customer stickiness because aviation parts are embedded in certified aircraft systems, supported by established maintenance procedures, and governed by stringent regulatory requirements. In practice, the installed base drives ongoing demand, while operational uptime needs create strong incentives for reliable, certified supply and maintenance turnaround.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue typically comes from a mix of OEM-related component sales and—more importantly for profitability—aftermarket and service-driven monetisation. Aftermarket activity monetizes the installed base through recurring repair/overhaul cycles and replacement demand driven by fleet utilization and component life limits.

Margin drivers tend to include: (1) the services mix (overhaul/repair generally commands higher contribution than bare component sales), (2) parts availability and turnaround performance that reduces customer downtime, and (3) inventory and procurement discipline given the cost and lead-time constraints common in aviation supply chains.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

PARK AEROSPACE’s moat is primarily rooted in switching costs and regulatory/qualification barriers, supported by a defensible installed-base advantage.

  • High switching costs (qualification + certification): Aircraft components—especially those tied to safety-critical systems—require extensive certification, documentation, and maintenance compatibility. Substituting suppliers is operationally and administratively burdensome for airlines and MROs.
  • Installed-base economics: Once parts are installed, replacement and overhaul opportunities recur over the aircraft’s life, creating a durable demand stream that is less sensitive to short-term aircraft manufacturing swings.
  • Aftermarket execution capability: Repair and overhaul performance (quality, traceability, turnaround reliability) matters as much as unit supply, because operators prioritize uptime and compliance.

Competitive benchmarking (industry participants)

  • Safran Landing Systems (landing gear and related systems): broad coverage across landing systems with strong OEM and aftermarket presence.
  • Collins Aerospace (airframe systems and components, including aftermarket support): diversified aviation supplier with deep maintenance and service capabilities.
  • ST Engineering (aviation MRO ecosystem): service-focused competitor with strong maintenance networks and operator relationships.

PARK AEROSPACE’s positioning emphasizes maintaining and supplying specific aircraft component capabilities within the aftermarket lifecycle, rather than competing as a full-spectrum OEM platform. This narrower focus can concentrate engineering know-how and support expertise on component families where qualification and operational fit create durable buyer lock-in.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the core demand backdrop is structural rather than purely cyclical:

  • Fleet growth and utilization: Expanding commercial fleets and sustained utilization expand the addressable aftermarket pool for component repair and replacement.
  • Aftermarket share shift: Operators tend to allocate a growing portion of spend to maintenance and component support rather than new aircraft purchasing, especially during periods of slower OEM deliveries or constrained capacity.
  • Defense sustainment demand: Long-duration aircraft programs and the need for maintainability support ongoing component servicing.
  • Lifecycle extension: Longer service lives and refurbishment cycles extend the time horizon over which aftermarket parts remain in demand.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and certification risk: Maintenance and aviation component approvals require continuous compliance. Any disruption in documentation, quality systems, or certification timelines can affect supply and service throughput.
  • Program and customer concentration: Revenue can be influenced by the mix and pacing of specific aircraft programs, operator purchasing patterns, and MRO contracting cycles.
  • Supply chain and input cost volatility: Aviation parts depend on specialized materials and components with long lead times; shortages or cost inflation can pressure margins.
  • Competitive substitution: While switching costs are high, incumbent positions can erode over long horizons if competitors achieve approvals faster, offer better turnaround economics, or secure preferred contracts.
  • Capital intensity and working capital needs: Inventory, repair tooling, and service capacity can require substantial working capital discipline, especially when demand timing shifts.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values aerospace components and aftermarket service providers through EV/EBITDA and earnings-based multiples, with a premium often linked to durability of aftermarket earnings and demonstrated service execution. Valuation sensitivity generally increases with:

  • Aftermarket mix and margin stability (service contribution and conversion of demand into earnings)
  • Quality and certification track record (lower perceived risk of supply interruption)
  • Working capital performance (inventory turns, repair cycle efficiency, and receivables management)
  • Contracting visibility and backlog quality (where applicable), particularly for parts and services tied to fleet utilization

Investors typically underwrite a blended view of aerospace production cycles and the more stable lifecycle-driven aftermarket demand.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

PARK AEROSPACE’s long-term investment appeal rests on a structural aftermarket model supported by switching costs, regulatory qualification barriers, and installed-base demand. While the business remains exposed to aviation macro cycles through procurement and fleet dynamics, the recurring nature of component servicing and overhaul activity can provide a more resilient earnings profile than pure OEM manufacturing peers.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-05-31

"PKE reported Q1’27 results (ending 2026-05-31) with Revenue of $18.31M and Net Income of $3.53M, delivering EPS of $0.17 and a net margin of 19.3%. YoY, revenue rose +18.9% versus 2025-06-01 ($15.40M) and net income increased +69.8% versus $2.08M; EPS also improved (from $0.10 to $0.17). QoQ, revenue declined -24.3% versus 2026-03-01 ($24.19M), while net income eased -8.0% ($3.84M to $3.53M) and operating income fell -12.6%, indicating moderation from a strong prior quarter. Profitability was mixed across the last four quarters: net margin improved YoY (13.5% to 19.3%) but contracted sequentially (15.9% in Q4’26 to 19.3% in Q1’27 is higher actually—however Q4 had 15.9% and Q1’27 had 19.3%, so margins expanded QoQ). Cash generation remains positive, with Operating Cash Flow of $2.72M and Free Cash Flow of $2.61M in the quarter. Shareholder returns look strong: the stock is up 161.2% over 1 year, and the company paid dividends (dividends paid of -$2.61M in Q1), supporting total return momentum. Balance sheet resilience is high: total assets were $144.4M, with very low leverage (total debt ~$0.31M; net debt ~$0.31M vs a large cash/short-term investment position), and equity of $145M+. Analysts have a $43 consensus target versus a $34.51 price (~25% upside)."

Revenue Growth

Positive

QoQ revenue fell -24.3% (from $24.19M to $18.31M), but YoY revenue rose +18.9% (from $15.40M). The last four quarters show an upward YoY trajectory despite quarterly volatility.

Profitability

Strong

Net margin expanded to 19.3% in 2026-05-31 (from 13.5% YoY) and improved versus prior quarter (Q4’26 net margin 15.9% to Q1’27 19.3%). EPS rose from $0.10 to $0.17 YoY.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

Q1’27 generated $2.72M OCF and $2.61M FCF. With dividends paid of ~$2.61M, cash coverage appears supported in this quarter, and buybacks were not indicated in the quarter.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Strong

Balance sheet strength is a key positive: total assets of $144.4M with very low debt (~$0.31M) and net cash positioning (net debt ~-$0.31M). Equity is substantial and stable vs liabilities.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total shareholder momentum is strong: 1-year price change is +161.2% (well above the 20% threshold). The company also paid dividends during the quarter (dividends paid ~$2.61M). No buyback was reported in Q1.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus target is $43 vs current ~$34.51, implying ~25% upside. Valuation appears expensive on traditional multiples (e.g., high price-to-sales and price-to-earnings in the provided ratio set), which tempers the score.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So what: Q1 2027 showed solid execution versus management’s own non-“beat” forecast ranges—sales $18.312m within $17.7m–$18.4m and adjusted EBITDA $4.576m within $4.1m–$4.6m, with gross margin at 34.8% and adj EBITDA margin at 25%. The quarter’s key margin signal was C2B mix: zero C2B fabric sales but $1.9m of higher-margin prepreg/ablative output, supporting the thesis that conversion capacity drives profitability. Outlook remains constructive but cautious: Q2 guidance calls for sales $19.5m–$21.0m and adj EBITDA $4.3m–$5.1m, while management explicitly flags supply chain and international freight risk as near-term pressure. The strategic pivot is missile systems supply assurance: Park is sole-source qualified for PAC-3 MSC ablative composite materials and is advancing C2B fabric capacity via Aireon—EUR 4.587m France advance and a July term sheet for a U.S. C2B plant with 100% output allocated to Park, tied to PAC-3 MSC ramp needs.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • A320neo program ramp: Airbus targeting 70–75 A320 aircraft-family deliveries per month by end of 2027, supporting growing LEAP-1A engine volumes (Park only on CFM LEAP-1A for A320 family).
  • Potential further LEAP-1A share gains from Pratt 1100G reliability issues and reported engine shortages, with CFM LEAP production ramping.
  • Missile systems restart from depletions: anticipated PAC-3 MSC (most advanced Patriot variant) quadrupling/rapid ramp needs for ablative materials used in solid rocket motor structures and heat shields.
  • C2B fabric supply expansion enabling PAC-3 MSC ramp: term sheet for a U.S.-based Aireon Group C2B fabric plant with Park’s output fully allocated.

Business Development

  • Aireon/ArianeGroup: exclusive distributor appointment (North America) for Raycarb C2B (since January 2022).
  • Aireon partnership agreement (March 2025): EUR 4,587,000 advance to fund 50/50 with Aireon construction of additional C2B fabric manufacturing capacity in France; one remaining installment noted for next April/Q1 2028 (timing language imprecise).
  • July 18, 2026 term sheet: Aireon and Park agreed to establish a U.S.-based C2B fabric manufacturing plant; definitive agreement expected before end of year; 100% of U.S. plant output allocated to Park.
  • Lockheed Martin: PAC-3 announcements referenced (PAC-3 ASC discussed as new naming/variant to avoid confusion with PAC-3 MSC).
  • L3Harris Missile Systems (formerly Aerojet): referenced as receiving U.S. DoD investment to expand solid rocket motor business affecting PAC-3-related production ecosystem.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q1 sales of $18.312m vs company’s prior Q1 expectation range of $17.7m–$18.4m (landed within range, toward the top end).
  • Q1 gross profit $6.376m; gross margin 34.8% (company emphasized preference to remain above 30%; described as happier vs Q4).
  • Q1 adjusted EBITDA $4.576m; adjusted EBITDA margin 25%.
  • Q1 adjusted EBITDA guidance range in prior quarter: $4.1m–$4.6m (company said it came in within range, near/high end).
  • ArianeGroup/Aireon impact on margins/segment mix: 0 C2B fabric sales in Q1; however $1.9m of ablative material sales (prepreg made from C2B fabric) was achieved, characterized as good margin vs low-markup fabric distribution.
  • Q2 outlook: sales guidance $19.5m–$21.0m; adjusted EBITDA $4.3m–$5.1m.
  • Management flagged Q2 sensitivity to supply chain and international freight risk (no quantified bps/tariff rate changes provided in transcript).
  • Balance sheet: $0 long-term debt; cash and marketable securities $89.4m at end of Q1; estimated ~$114m at end of June 2026 after ATM cash inflow.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share buyback: purchased 718,000 shares at average price $12.94 (authorization activity referenced as ongoing; no specific buybacks stated for Q1/Q2 immediate period beyond this authorization activity).
  • ATM common stock offering: recent $50m at-the-market offering completed.
  • ATM issuance details: during Q4 sold ~943,000 shares for ~$22.8m at ~$24.21/share (before commissions); in June (Q2) sold ~170,000 shares for ~$27.174m at ~$31.24/share (before commissions).
  • Total ATM issuance: 1,812,601 shares for ~$49.996m at ~$27.58/share (before commissions); company highlighted buy-sell price spread vs $12.94 buyback average.
  • Cash runway/uses stated: planned investment $65m in a new plant; $25m in areas C2B fabric plant via advanced payments (company implied cash coverage but did not provide net runway calculation).

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Segment/mix management: management emphasized that selling C2B fabric (low markup) vs converting to prepreg/ablative materials (higher margin) affects quarterly margin; Q1 had zero C2B fabric sales but $1.9m in prepreg/ablative sales.
  • Missile systems scaling narrative: Park described being sole-source qualified for advanced composite ablative materials for solid rocket motor structures and heat shields for PAC-3 MSC.
  • Operational footprint for GE Aerospace: management referenced having built a redundant factory in Newton for GE aerospace programs and ongoing LTA amendments including film adhesive products entering qualification.
  • No automation/store closure details provided in transcript excerpt.

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • A320 aircraft-family: Airbus targeting 70–75 deliveries per month by end of 2027, stabilizing thereafter.
  • A320neo engine market share: CFM LEAP-1A firm engine orders market share cited at 66.2% (as of March 31, 2026), translating to 1,192 LEAP-1A engines/year at the 75/month delivery-rate assumption (company also referenced a conservative 1,080 engines using 60% market share assumption in its juggernaut math).
  • 777X outlook (GE9X): certification test program moved to Phase 4B of FAA type certification testing; Boeing anticipates certification early-to-mid 2027 and first delivery mid 2027.
  • COMAC C919/919: company noted COMAC 919 ramp target of 150 (units/rate language not fully specified) and reported that engine availability has limited ramp-up.
  • Missile supply agreements: definitive agreement for the U.S. C2B plant expected before end of the year (after July 18 term sheet).

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Short-term supply chain and international freight risk flagged by management as potentially impacting Q2 performance (no quantitative estimate provided).
  • Missile interceptors/stockpile depletion environment: management described urgency and uncertainty due to depleted stockpiles and geopolitical conflicts, implying schedule/production variability.
  • Competitive/engine supply dynamics: Pratt 1100G reliability/shortage cited as tailwind for LEAP-1A; management also acknowledged potential supply issues/complaints with CFM (risk that CFM supply performance could affect outcomes).
  • Execution risk on missile supply ramp: U.S. C2B fabric plant capacity described as critical but definitive agreement timing and build-out schedule extend beyond current quarter.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the PKE Q1 2027 (fiscal 2027 first quarter) earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    © 2026 Stock Market Info — Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) Financial Profile