Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.

Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) Market Cap

Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Anish Bhatnagar

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Biotechnology

IPO Date: 2014-11-13

Website: https://soleno.life

Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Healthcare

Company Profile

Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) operates as a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, specializing in the creation and market introduction of groundbreaking treatments for uncommon illnesses. The cornerstone of its therapeutic pipeline is Diazoxide Choline Controlled-Release, a once-daily oral tablet aimed at addressing Prader-Willi Syndrome, currently progressing through an active Phase III clinical evaluation. Established in 1999, the Redwood City, California-headquartered firm adopted its current name, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc., in May 2017, having previously operated as Capnia, Inc.

Analyst Sentiment

50%
Hold

From 11 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $76.50

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$53

Median

$77

High Bound

$100

Average

$77

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$76.50
▲ +44.31% Upside
Low Target
$53.00
-0% Risk
Median Target
$76.50
44% Mid
High Target
$100.00
89% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC (SLNO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Soleno Therapeutics operates as a biopharmaceutical developer: it advances internally discovered therapeutic candidates through preclinical and clinical stages, then seeks regulatory approval and commercialization either directly or through commercial/strategic partners. The value chain is research platform → target biology validation → IND-enabling work and clinical execution → regulatory submission → market access and commercial execution (or partnering). Because the company’s assets are primarily clinical-stage programs, customer “stickiness” is not the primary economic feature; instead, valuation depends on the durability of its intellectual property, the reproducibility of trial outcomes, and the credibility of its regulatory pathway and manufacturing approach.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue for companies structured like Soleno is typically dominated by one or more of the following:
  • Non-dilutive funding: grant income (where applicable) and collaboration/partnering economics.
  • Collaboration revenue: upfront payments, development cost sharing, and future milestones tied to clinical/regulatory achievements.
  • Commercial economics (if approvals occur): product royalties, profit share, or later-stage sales participation depending on deal terms.
Margin drivers are not near-term “operating leverage” revenue mechanics; rather, they hinge on (1) development cost efficiency, (2) the probability-weighted path to approval, and (3) the terms of partnerships that reduce cash burn while preserving upside.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The most relevant moats in healthcare development are Patent Protection and High Barriers to Entry created by clinical evidence and regulatory execution (FDA/other agency requirements). For Soleno, the competitive positioning is best viewed through the lens of pipeline defensibility:
  • Patent Protection (Intangible Asset Moat): proprietary compositions, methods-of-use, and process-related IP can constrain competitive entry and preserve economics after approval.
  • Regulatory/Clinical Evidence Barrier: even if scientific concepts can be replicated, meaningful market share usually requires comparative clinical evidence, safety and efficacy data, and manufacturing reliability suitable for regulatory review.
  • Platform Execution Credibility: prior trial design quality and operational execution can improve counterparties’ willingness to partner and investors’ confidence in probabilistic outcomes.
COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: Primary peer sets for development-stage therapeutics and related modalities often include:
  • Sarepta Therapeutics (genetic/rare disease therapeutics with large commercialization capability)
  • BioMarin Pharmaceutical (commercial scale plus late-stage/approved rare disease franchises)
  • uniQure (gene-therapy-focused development and commercialization)
Soleno’s distinction versus larger rivals is generally that the market may treat its value as more binary and more dependent on clinical milestones, while larger competitors benefit from (i) established commercial infrastructure, (ii) deeper balance sheets, and (iii) broader, diversified portfolios that reduce single-program risk. The economic “race” is less about near-term sales strength and more about defensible science that reaches approval with an IP-protected and regulator-acceptable path.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is driven by:
  • Pipeline progression and de-risking: advancing programs through clinical endpoints that meaningfully alter approval probability.
  • Regulatory durability and labeling expansion: successful approval can create optionality for additional indications, dosing strategies, or combination approaches—when supported by evidence.
  • Non-dilutive capital via partnerships: structured collaborations can extend runway and improve the economics of risk-sharing, preserving shareholder upside.
  • Competitive differentiation through evidence: when clinical results demonstrate meaningful benefits versus standard of care, market access and pricing power can improve, reinforcing long-term franchise value (post-approval).
TAM expansion is primarily indication-driven: as therapeutic candidates demonstrate efficacy in targeted populations, addressable patient segments expand through approved use and payer-supported uptake.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Structural threats for a development-stage healthcare company include:
  • Clinical risk (binary outcomes): adverse safety signals, insufficient efficacy, or inability to replicate results across cohorts can impair the entire value proposition.
  • Regulatory risk: complete response letters, labeling constraints, or requests for additional studies can delay commercialization and increase costs.
  • Capital intensity and dilution: continued funding needs may force equity issuance or unfavorable restructuring if milestones are delayed.
  • IP and competitive infringement: patent challenges, design-arounds, and competing programs targeting similar biological pathways can erode exclusivity.
  • Manufacturing and supply chain execution: scalable, consistent manufacturing at commercial quality can become a gating factor for approvals and sustained supply.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Healthcare biotech valuations typically reflect probability-weighted pipeline value rather than stable cash-flow multiples:
  • Risk-adjusted valuation framework: markets often adjust enterprise value based on the probability of success, timelines, and expected commercial outcomes of leading programs.
  • Cash runway and financing overhang: liquidity position and expected capital needs can dominate near-term perception even when operational progress continues.
  • Milestone sensitivity: regulatory and clinical inflection points frequently move expectations for probability of approval and eventual commercial value.
Key valuation drivers are therefore (1) credible de-risking of clinical endpoints, (2) IP defensibility around the approved use, and (3) the ability to finance development without excessive dilution.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Soleno Therapeutics’ long-term investment case rests on the classic biotech value chain: advancing defensible therapeutic programs through clinical and regulatory hurdles, supported by patent-protected differentiation and execution credibility. The “moat” is less about switching costs and more about intellectual property, regulatory barriers, and evidence-based market access. Upside hinges on durable clinical validation and partnerable commercialization pathways, while the primary risk is the probabilistic nature of development coupled with financing requirements.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"SLNO reported Q1 2026 (ended 2026-03-31) revenue of $94.6M and net income of $31.4M (EPS: $0.60 / diluted $0.59). Compared with Q4 2025 (2025-12-31), revenue rose +3.2% QoQ ($94.6M vs. $91.7M) and net income decreased -27.7% QoQ ($31.4M vs. $43.4M). Versus Q1 2025 (2025-03-31), revenue increased from $0 to $94.6M (effectively +100% YoY), while net income improved from -$43.8M to +$31.4M (an improvement of $75.2M YoY). Profitability is transitioning sharply from losses to sustained profits over the 4-quarter window: net margin expanded from -144% in Q2 2025 to +33% in Q1 2026, with operating margin also positive (33.1% in Q1 2026). Operating cash flow in Q1 2026 was $26.0M and free cash flow was $25.9M, supporting earnings quality despite significant investment cash movements tied to maturities/purchases of investments. Balance sheet liquidity improved materially: cash and short-term investments were $255.6M, and net debt remained negative (net cash) at -$128.6M. Shareholder returns appear mixed: the stock is down -24.5% over 1Y, with no dividend and only minimal buyback impact in the quarter (-$4k). Analyst consensus price target implies upside (~80 vs. 52.78)."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue increased +3.2% QoQ to $94.6M and improved substantially vs. Q1 2025 ($0 to $94.6M; not meaningful growth from a zero base).

Profitability

Positive

Net margin improved dramatically from loss-making periods (e.g., Q2 2025 net margin -14.4%) to +33.2% in Q1 2026. However, net income fell -27.7% QoQ ($43.4M to $31.4M).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Q1 2026 operating cash flow was $26.0M and free cash flow $25.9M, covering earnings positively. Cash flows were also influenced by investment purchases/maturities, so operating cash conversion should be monitored.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Strong liquidity and resilience: cash + short-term investments were $255.6M in Q1 2026, total assets rose to $608.4M, and net debt stayed negative at -$128.6M.

Shareholder Returns

Caution

No dividend (0% yield). Buybacks were negligible in Q1 2026 (-$4k). Price momentum was negative: 1Y change -24.5%, which drags total return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target of $80 vs. $52.78 current suggests upside (~+52%). Valuation metrics remain rich (e.g., price-to-sales ~18.4x), warranting proof of sustained profitability.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So what: SLNO delivered a clear Q4 inflection from commercial launch—$91.7M net revenue (+~40% sequential) and full-year $190.4M with positive $20.9M net income, supported by $506.1M cash after a $100M accelerated buyback. Growth is primarily traction in VYKAT XR adoption: 1,250 patient start forms since March 26 launch and 859 active patients by Dec 31, plus 136 new prescribers in Q4 to reach 630. Management reaffirmed momentum by targeting ~1,000 additional start forms over the next 9–12 months, while real-world safety/persistence remains consistent with expectations (12% adverse-event discontinuation; ~15% total, targeting 15–20% long-term). Key uncertainty is cadence (Q1 gross-to-net seasonality) and future persistence drivers, but analysts were also focused on how far the franchise can extend: GSD 1 is positioned as a high-likelihood mechanism match, with dosing likely similar given diazoxide sensitivity and adoption tied to trial-defined tolerability. EU approval path continues toward mid-2026 decision.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • VYKAT XR launch momentum: 1,250 patient start forms from March 26 launch through Dec 31, 2025; 859 active patients as of Dec 31; goal to add ~1,000 start forms over next 9 to 12 months
  • Real-world persistence: ~12% discontinuation due to adverse events at end of Q4; total discontinuation ~15% with long-term target range of 15% to 20%
  • Commercial education/activation: Q4 added 136 new prescribers to reach 630 unique prescribers; continued KOL and caregiver outreach (webinars/live events)

Business Development

  • EU regulatory pathway progression for DCCR in the EU: EMA marketing authorization application validated; EMA Day 120 questions answered; considering EU commercialization options (no named partners/counterparties disclosed in provided text)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 total net revenue: $91.7M; sequential growth nearly 40% vs $66.0M in Q3 (guidance/consensus not provided in transcript)
  • Full-year 2025 total net revenue: $190.4M (note: less than 9 months of commercial availability); positive full-year net income $20.9M
  • Q4 profitability: net income approx. $43.4M; EPS $0.82 basic and $0.80 diluted (vs net loss $(56.0)M, EPS $(1.27) in 4Q24)
  • Cash generation: $48.7M cash from operating activities in Q4; ended year with $506.1M cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities after $100M accelerated share repurchase
  • COGS: $0.9M in Q4 and $2.7M for full year; management expects COGS as % of revenue to rise as 0-cost pre-approval inventory depletes; COGS to stay in mid-single digits (no explicit bps figure provided)
  • R&D efficiency trend: R&D expense $9.6M in Q4 vs $21.5M in Q4 2024; full-year R&D $40.6M vs $78.6M in 2024
  • Operating leverage/SC&A: Q4 SG&A $40.9M vs prior-year Q4 $37.3M (stock-based comp included); full-year SG&A $132.1M vs $105.9M in 2024

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Accelerated share repurchase: $100M announced in November; impact reflected in cash balance (post-APR cash $506.1M total at year-end)
  • No debt level disclosed in provided text; balance sheet characterized as sufficiently capitalized for U.S. launch and EU/other geographies commercialization and investments into potential new indications
  • Cash runway referenced qualitatively: over $500M cash/cash equivalents/marketable securities at year-end

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Commercial KPIs to be retired after Q1 2026 earnings call (when 12 months of results are available): patient start forms, unique prescribers, lives covered
  • EU regulatory execution cadence: submission/EMA validation completed; responses submitted for Day 120; Day 180 questions expected end of February
  • COGS normalization plan: transition from 0-cost inventory (expensed pre-approval as R&D) to at-cost inventory as product sold
  • Market access expansion: commercial + Medicaid + Medicare coverage policies covering over 180M lives by end of Q4; reimbursed claims covered from approx. 45 state Medicaid programs through Q4

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • PWS demand: management expects to capture additional ~1,000 patient start forms over the next 9 to 12 months
  • EMA timeline for DCCR: decision expected in midyear 2026 time frame
  • EMA Day 180: anticipated Day 180 questions around end of February (separate Q asks when in hand)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Adoption/persistence risk remains tied to discontinuation: management cites 12% adverse-event-related discontinuation as of end of Q4 and total discontinuation ~15%, expecting long-term 15% to 20%
  • Uncertainty in future launch cadence and potential Q1 gross-to-net seasonality drivers (copay resets; plan churn/free bucket dynamics) may affect reported revenue even if active patient growth is unchanged
  • EU approval risk: rare-disease EMA decision-making may require adequate efficacy data; management is still addressing EMA Day 180 questions and considering commercialization options

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: 1,000 additional patient start forms—cadence and seasonality expectations. Management emphasized thinking in 9–12 month terms rather than quarter-to-quarter “bolus” timing. They indicated start forms “will come in over the year,” with seasonal effects (copay resets, plan churn/free-bucket moves) impacting Q1 gross-to-net but not active growth, pending Q1 quantification.
  • Topic: GSD 1 expansion—expected dosing and adoption impact from tolerability. Management stated the first trial will evaluate dosing in GSD 1; diazoxide sensitivity suggests dosing likely in a similar range to current experience. They expect more room to dose because GSD 1 patients are less likely to be obese/diabetic like many PWS comorbidities, but tolerability/adoption specifics remain to be observed.
  • Topic: Long-term persistence and real-world efficacy—dropout timing and what efficacy signals look like. Management said discontinuations due to lack of efficacy are “few” to date; they expect that if patients remain on therapy, efficacy benefits should occur based on multi-year clinical trial experience. In real world, they cited anecdotes primarily around reduced hyperphagia and associated behaviors, plus reports of increased calm/social interaction and less anxiety.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SLNO Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) Financial Profile