Trustmark Corporation

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) Market Cap

Trustmark Corporation has a market capitalization of $2.59B.

Price: $44.15

0.13 (0.30%)

Market Cap: 2.59B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Duane Arthur Dewey

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1980-03-17

Website: https://www.trustmark.com

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) - Company Information

Market Cap: 2.59B|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Trustmark Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Trustmark National Bank that provides banking and other financial solutions to individuals and corporate institutions in the United States. The company operates through three segments: General Banking, Wealth Management, and Insurance. It offers checking, savings, and money market accounts; certificates of deposits and individual retirement accounts; financing for commercial and industrial projects, income-producing commercial real estate, owner-occupied real estate, and construction and land development; and installment and real estate loans, and lines of credit, as well as treasury management services. The company also provides mortgage banking services, including construction financing, production of conventional and government-insured mortgages, and secondary marketing and mortgage servicing. In addition, it provides wealth management and trust services, such as administration of personal trusts and estates; management of investment accounts for individuals, employee benefit plans, and charitable foundations; and corporate trust and institutional custody, securities brokerage, financial and estate planning, retirement plan, and investment management services. Further, the company offers business insurance products and services for medical professionals, construction, manufacturing, hospitality, real estate, and group life and health plans; and life and health insurance, and personal line policies for individual customers. As of December 31, 2021, it operated 167 full-service branches and 13 limited service branches; and 198 automated teller machines and 69 interactive teller machines. The company was founded in 1889 and is headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi.

Analyst Sentiment

56%
Buy

From 6 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $45.50

▲ +3.1% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$46

Median

$46

High Bound

$46

Average

$46

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$45.50
▲ +3.06% Upside
Low Target
$45.50
3% Risk
Median Target
$45.50
3% Mid
High Target
$45.50
3% Max
Consensus
Hold
0 / 9 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)2,5872,4792,3252,3972,2042,0972,1611,9481,818
Enterprise Value ($M)3,0092,9012,7732,5152,8092,4982,4442,1761,873
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)11.4611.0510.0410.559.879.779.599.496.16
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.205.670.04
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)2.178.948.226.258.858.578.547.4225.23
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.221.161.101.131.061.041.100.980.97
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)15.01120.2253.3231.5468.5926.8422.7239.55189.06
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)10.469.806.5611.2810.209.668.2925.99
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)9.4040.8732.4629.5735.6633.8032.7730.15-14.61
Debt to Equity Ratio1.320.450.530.400.600.490.430.520.47

TRMK Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$44.15
Intrinsic Value$165.64
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 275.2%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 21%21%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.85B
Perpetuity TV Value$16.05B
Discounted TV (PV)$6.78B
TV Weighting %67.6%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 TRUSTMARK CORP (TRMK) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Trustmark Corp is a regional financial services company organized around a core bank operating model plus fee-based businesses. The bank collects deposits from consumer and commercial customers, then allocates that funding primarily into loans (including commercial and consumer credit) and investment securities. Income is generated through (1) net interest margin on the loan and securities portfolio funded by low-cost deposits and (2) non-interest income such as deposit-related fees, mortgage and servicing economics, and other customer service revenues. Credit performance and disciplined underwriting are central to sustaining earnings power across cycles.

A distinguishing feature versus many bank peers is the company’s operational focus on customer relationships in defined geographic markets, supported by branch and digital channels. This creates relationship depth across checking/savings, lending, and ancillary services, which tends to reduce churn and stabilize deposit franchises.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Trustmark’s monetization is driven by the spread between the yield on earning assets (loans and securities) and the cost of deposits and wholesale funding. The company’s margin profile is heavily influenced by:

  • Net interest income (recurring core): Loan growth and mix, investment duration/asset mix, and the cost/structure of deposits.
  • Deposit beta and funding composition: Lower-cost core deposits (versus interest-sensitive funds) typically support steadier earnings through rate cycles.
  • Non-interest income (more fee-like): Mortgage and servicing-related revenue, deposit and transaction fees, and other service income that can help offset pressure from margin compression.

Margin resilience and expense discipline are the primary levers on profitability. Long-run upside depends on maintaining credit quality while scaling earning assets with an efficient cost structure.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The moat in regional banking is typically less about brand and more about funding economics, credit culture, and regulatory/operational execution. For Trustmark, the key advantages are:

  • Cost of Deposits (Funding Moat): A stable base of core deposits can lower funding costs, improving risk-adjusted returns on loans and securities. This is particularly valuable when asset yields normalize or competition for deposits intensifies.
  • Credit Culture & Underwriting Discipline (Quality Moat): Consistent underwriting standards and active portfolio management reduce charge-offs and support more stable net income through credit downturns.
  • Regulatory/Operational Barriers (Compliance Moat): Banking requires persistent capital, liquidity, risk management, and regulatory readiness. Effective governance is difficult for new entrants to replicate quickly at scale.
  • Relationship Switching Costs: Banking customers build embedded value through recurring account activity, direct lending relationships, and service tie-ins. While deposit “stickiness” is not absolute, relationship depth increases retention and cross-sell opportunity.

Competitive benchmarking (regional peers):

  • Fifth Third (FITB): broader footprint and scale across major metro markets; competes more on scale-driven product breadth.
  • Regions Financial (RF): diversified regional presence with emphasis on consumer and commercial banking; competes heavily in deposit gathering and lending in multiple geographies.
  • Comerica (CMA): commercial-oriented posture in select markets with distinct sector exposures.

Trustmark’s positioning emphasizes relationship banking within a more focused geographic footprint, aiming for durable funding and credit execution rather than maximal national reach. This focus can be a competitive strength when scaled funding and disciplined risk management matter more than raw market share.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is likely to come from a combination of balance-sheet expansion and product/platform deepening, supported by macro and customer-level trends:

  • Commercial credit demand and working-capital cycles: Regional banks can benefit as small and mid-sized businesses expand, refinance, and manage cash-flow needs.
  • Deposit franchise stability and balance-sheet optimization: Ongoing deposit gathering and mix management can support sustained net interest income through changing rate environments.
  • Fee business contribution: Mortgage and servicing economics, deposit-related fees, and other service revenue can grow as customer bases expand and retention improves.
  • Higher value through cross-sell: Relationship banking allows incremental revenue per household or business client (lending plus transaction and service products), increasing lifetime value.
  • Regulated capital and risk-based competition: Banks with strong governance and underwriting can selectively grow while weaker peers retrench, supporting market-share capture over cycles.

The durable compounding case hinges on aligning loan growth with credit culture and maintaining a stable funding mix that supports attractive risk-adjusted returns.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit-cycle risk: Economic slowdown can raise delinquencies and charge-offs, pressuring earnings and capital if underwriting standards soften.
  • Interest-rate and margin compression: Changes in the interest-rate environment can impact asset yields and deposit costs; the ability to manage deposit beta and repricing gaps matters.
  • Liquidity and funding concentration: Dependence on any particular funding sources can elevate volatility in stress scenarios.
  • Regulatory and capital requirements: Higher capital or liquidity constraints can limit growth or reduce profitability if not offset by efficiency gains.
  • Operational and technology risk: Cybersecurity, fraud controls, and modernization costs can affect both expenses and risk outcomes.

These risks are structural to banking and are best monitored through credit metrics, capital adequacy trends, liquidity posture, and evidence of consistent governance and controls.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value regional banks using a blend of metrics tied to earnings durability, balance-sheet quality, and capital efficiency. The most common frameworks include:

  • P/TBV (price to tangible book value): Important because tangible equity quality and credit-loss expectations influence what the market “pays” for book value.
  • P/E and forward earnings power: Reflects profitability expectations and the assumed normalization path for net interest income and credit costs.
  • Efficiency and credit indicators: Efficiency ratio trends and credit outcomes often drive re-rating decisions more than headline revenue growth.

Key valuation drivers for this sector tend to include: sustainable net interest income under realistic deposit pricing assumptions, manageable credit losses across cycles, and credible capital generation (retained earnings and prudent payout policy). When confidence rises around these factors, the market typically grants higher multiples; when uncertainty rises, multiples compress even if near-term earnings are intact.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Trustmark’s investment appeal rests on the typical banking “moat stack”: cost-of-deposits discipline, a credit culture designed to withstand downturns, and the operational/regulatory barriers that protect a funded franchise. With growth anchored in relationship banking and balanced expansion of loans and fee businesses, the long-term thesis is that earnings power can compound if the company sustains underwriting rigor and maintains stable funding economics through interest-rate and credit cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for TRMK.

zacks.com2026-05-20

Why Trustmark (TRMK) is a Great Dividend Stock Right Now

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Trustmark (TRMK) have what it takes?

fool.com2026-05-16

A Fund Just Opened an $82 Million Position in Trustmark. Here’s What Investors Should Know

Trustmark provides banking, wealth management, and insurance across the Southeast.

zacks.com2026-05-04

Why Trustmark (TRMK) is a Top Dividend Stock for Your Portfolio

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Trustmark (TRMK) have what it takes?

seekingalpha.com2026-04-29

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-04-28

Trustmark (TRMK) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

Although the revenue and EPS for Trustmark (TRMK) give a sense of how its business performed in the quarter ended March 2026, it might be worth considering how some key metrics compare with Wall Street estimates and the year-ago numbers.

zacks.com2026-04-28

Trustmark (TRMK) Q1 Earnings and Revenues Surpass Estimates

Trustmark (TRMK) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.95 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.87 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.88 per share a year ago.

businesswire.com2026-04-28

Trustmark Corporation Announces First Quarter 2026 Financial Results

JACKSON, Miss.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Trustmark Corporation Announces First Quarter 2026 Financial Results.

defenseworld.net2026-04-27

Head-To-Head Analysis: Trustmark (NASDAQ:TRMK) and Colony Bankcorp (NYSE:CBAN)

Trustmark (NASDAQ: TRMK - Get Free Report) and Colony Bankcorp (NYSE: CBAN - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations. Insider and Institutional Ownership 67.6% of Trustmark shares are

zacks.com2026-04-16

Trustmark (TRMK) Could Be a Great Choice

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Trustmark (TRMK) have what it takes?

zacks.com2026-04-15

Is Trustmark (TRMK) Stock Outpacing Its Finance Peers This Year?

Here is how Trustmark (TRMK) and Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) have performed compared to their sector so far this year.

zacks.com2026-04-13

Are You Looking for a Top Momentum Pick? Why Trustmark (TRMK) is a Great Choice

Does Trustmark (TRMK) have what it takes to be a top stock pick for momentum investors? Let's find out.

defenseworld.net2026-04-05

First Community Bancshares (NASDAQ:FCBC) & Trustmark (NASDAQ:TRMK) Financial Analysis

Trustmark (NASDAQ: TRMK - Get Free Report) and First Community Bancshares (NASDAQ: FCBC - Get Free Report) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation. Dividends Trustmark pays an annual dividend of $1.00

zacks.com2026-04-02

Why Investors Need to Take Advantage of These 2 Finance Stocks Now

The Zacks Earnings ESP is a great way to find potential earnings surprises. Why investors should take advantage now.

businesswire.com2026-04-01

Trustmark Corporation to Announce First Quarter Financial Results April 28 and Conduct Earnings Conference Call April 29

JACKSON, Miss.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Trustmark Corporation to Announce First Quarter Financial Results April 28 and Conduct Earnings Conference Call April 29.

zacks.com2026-03-31

Are You Looking for a High-Growth Dividend Stock?

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Trustmark (TRMK) have what it takes?

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"TRMK (Q1’26, ended 2026-03-31) reported revenue of $277.2M and net income of $56.1M, with EPS of $0.95. YoY, revenue declined from $244.8M (Q1’25) to $277.2M (+13.2% YoY), while net income rose from $53.6M to $56.1M (+4.7% YoY). QoQ, revenue edged down from $283.0M (Q4’25) to $277.2M (-2.0% QoQ) and net income slipped from $57.9M to $56.1M (-3.1% QoQ). Profitability was solid with net margin at 20.2% in Q1’26. Margins were slightly contracting vs Q4’25 (20.4%) but improved vs Q1’25 (21.9%). The company generated $27.1M of operating cash flow and $20.6M free cash flow, supporting ongoing shareholder returns. Dividend payments were $14.9M; buybacks were $19.8M during the quarter, indicating a balanced capital return posture. Balance sheet resilience appears intact: total assets were ~$18.99B, with equity at ~$2.13B remaining stable QoQ. Net debt was ~$0.42B, modest versus total assets and not the primary constraint given strong cash generation. From a total shareholder return perspective, the stock price is up 39.5% over the last year (1Y_change), which meaningfully boosts the outlook alongside a low dividend yield (~0.6%). Analysts show a consensus price target of $45.5 versus ~$45.29 currently, implying limited upside from target levels but strong momentum already reflected in price."

Revenue Growth

Positive

Revenue grew +13.2% YoY (Q1’26 vs Q1’25) but fell -2.0% QoQ (Q1’26 vs Q4’25), indicating moderate top-line volatility.

Profitability

Positive

Net income increased +4.7% YoY, but net margin eased vs Q1’25 (20.2% vs 21.9%) and slightly vs Q4’25 (20.2% vs 20.4%), suggesting mild margin pressure.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

Operating cash flow was $27.1M and free cash flow $20.6M in the latest quarter. Capital returns included dividends ($14.9M) and buybacks ($19.8M), supporting shareholder yield consistency.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Total assets were stable (~$18.99B) and equity held around ~$2.13B QoQ. Net debt was modest at ~$0.42B, indicating resilience without balance sheet stress.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong total return profile: stock up 39.5% over 1 year, plus dividends (~0.6% yield) and buybacks in Q1’26. Price momentum (>20% 1y_change) materially strengthens the score.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Consensus price target ($45.5) is roughly in-line with the current price (~$45.29), implying limited additional upside despite positive momentum; valuation signals appear not heavily discounted.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Trustmark’s Q1 2026 showed steady profitability (EPS $0.95; net income $56.1m) supported by loan growth (+1.5% linked quarter; +4.8% y/y), stable credit (net charge-offs 4 bps; allowance 1.16%), and improving funding costs (deposit cost 1.63%, down 9 bps). The key market-facing story is NIM management: management reaffirmed full-year 2026 NIM at 3.80%–3.85% despite rate-cut modeling assumptions removing further Fed cuts. In Q&A, they guided modest linked-quarter declines in deposit costs and loan yields with HTM securities yields grinding higher, netting roughly 1 bp of quarterly NIM accretion and “relative stability” after Q2. Noninterest income appears more sensitive to capital markets and a mortgage hedging wildcard. CRE timing and one CRE project drove nonaccrual increases, but management highlighted delayed payoffs and potential later-year positive outcomes. Overall, guidance looks maintained, with execution tied to funding competition, CRE throughput, and mortgage hedge behavior.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Loans held for investment up $203.7m (+1.5% linked quarter) and $636.5m (+4.8% y/y), with C&I strength and CRE stabilization despite timing shifts in maturities
  • Noninterest income growth: $42.3m in Q1 (+2.7% q/q; +8.1% y/y implied), supported by wealth/brokerage platform stabilization and production talent build-out in growth markets
  • Disciplined expense posture with noninterest expense flat q/q ($132.2m) despite y/y increase (+$8.1m), positioning for improved operating leverage as investments begin to pay back

Business Development

  • Wealth management: adding new production talent in high-growth potential markets (number of hires disclosed)
  • Brokerage platform transition completed: moved from LPL platform to Raymond James platform; fully stabilized in 2H 2025 with expectation for improved brokerage performance (including managed assets)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Diluted EPS $0.95; net income $56.1m; ROA 1.2% and ROTCE 12.58%
  • NIM unchanged q/q at 3.81%; full-year NIM guidance reaffirmed at 3.80%–3.85%
  • Cost of total deposits 1.63%, down 9 bps linked quarter; Q2 deposit cost guide cited around 1.60%
  • Loan yield/deposit cost dynamics: management expects a few bps declines in Q2 on linked-quarter basis for both deposit costs and loan yields; securities yields (HTM repricing) grinding higher
  • Net charge-offs $1.3m = 4 bps of avg loans; allowance for credit losses 1.16% of loans held for investment
  • Credit provision: net provision for credit losses $2.7m in Q1; Q&A cited net provision $2.74m and funded side $4.7m
  • Repurchases: $19.8m deployed in Q1 (approx. 477k shares) = 0.8% of shares outstanding at YE 2025; $100m authorization remaining for 2026 (subject to discretion/market conditions)
  • Capital ratios: CET1 11.7% and total risk-based capital 14.37% as of 03/31/2026
  • Dividend: $0.25 regular quarterly dividend payable 06/15/2026 to holders of record 06/01/2026
  • CRE credit movement: single CRE credit drove $12.3m increase in nonaccruals; borrower moved from substandard to nonaccrual due to appraisal/value disagreement; LOI exists but not converted to PSA

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase deployed: $19.8m in Q1; cadence target discussed as ~$20m/quarter (high end) or ~$70m–$80m total repurchases for full-year 2026, assuming consistent loan growth
  • Dividend policy continued: $0.25/share payable 06/15/2026 (record 06/01/2026)
  • Capital position maintained: CET1 11.7% and total risk-based capital 14.37% at 03/31/2026; management indicated capital ratios roughly flat linked-quarter despite repurchases and >$200m loan growth

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • NIM management approach: guidance based on market-implied forwards; expect deposit costs and loan yields to drift modestly lower while HTM securities yields grind higher
  • Hiring investments in growth markets continue; Q1 2026 disclosed as ~7 new hires (first quarter seasonally slower due to bonuses); prior disclosed totals: 21 new hires in Q3 (messaged to Street) and ~13 in Q4
  • CRE/portfolio management: CRE scheduled maturities in Q1 migrated to later in 2026 or 2027–2028; management expects payoffs to be spread out and recognizes permitting/construction stabilization delays

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Affirmed full-year 2026 guidance: loans held for investment increase single digits; deposits excluding brokered deposits increase mid-single digits; securities stable
  • Full-year net interest income: expected to increase mid-single digits; NIM 3.80%–3.85% reaffirmed
  • Credit: provision for credit losses expected to normalize
  • Noninterest income and noninterest expense: both expected to increase mid-single digits in 2026
  • Q2 NIM mechanics guidance: deposit cost guide 1.60% (management said currently running ~1.59% in April) with slower residual CD repricing tailwind and countervailing promotional/exception money market repricing effects

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Mortgage wildcard: extended period of negative net hedge ineffectiveness; management stated it is difficult to forecast and could swing noninterest income meaningfully if it turns
  • CRE paydown timing headwind: maturities originally expected in Q1 did not occur as planned; payoffs spread out over longer horizon requires continued new production and project stabilization
  • Competitive deposit environment: loan growth outpaces deposit growth, keeping deposits competitive; exception pricing/requests on money market accounts can offset CD repricing declines
  • CRE credit deterioration risk: nonaccrual increase tied to one CRE project; reliance on LOI conversion/refinancing/sale outcomes
  • M&A discussions subject to macro/geopolitical/economic tempering (management cited war-related economic issues and high gas prices) though strategy remains organic-first

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • NIM puts/takes and how deposit costs/loan yields change: Management anchored guidance to market-implied forwards with further Fed cuts removed, guiding “few basis points” declines in Q2 for both deposit costs and loan yields, offset by HTM securities repricing. They estimated ~1 bp (or so) of NIM accretion per quarter, with stability after Q2.
  • Noninterest income outlook, especially wealth/AUM and brokerage performance: Management said revenue depends heavily on market appreciation (trust wealth and brokerage). They cited improved production in growth markets via added talent. They also referenced completing the LPL to Raymond James platform transition in 2H 2025 and being stabilized, supporting continued progress and stabilization.
  • Credit and CRE specifics driving NPLs/nonaccruals and reserve movements: Management clarified coverage moved from 1.15% to 1.16% and net provision was $2.74m with a funded component of $4.7m. The $12.3m nonaccrual change was driven mainly by one CRE credit moving substandard to nonaccrual; LOI exists but not converted to PSA, with impaired/reserved valuation.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the TRMK Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for TRMK.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (TRMK)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) Financial Profile