Yext, Inc.

Yext, Inc. (YEXT) Market Cap

Yext, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Michael Walrath

Sector: Technology

Industry: Software - Application

IPO Date: 2017-04-13

Website: https://www.yext.com

Yext, Inc. (YEXT) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

Yext, Inc., founded in 2006 and headquartered in New York, New York, specializes in structuring and disseminating critical business information to address consumer queries across North America and globally. The company's core offering is the Yext platform, a cloud-based solution that enables clients to precisely control the facts about their businesses, manage their online content and landing pages, and oversee customer reviews. This is accomplished by leveraging a vast "knowledge network" comprising roughly 200 digital touchpoints, such as mapping services, mobile applications, search engines, intelligent GPS systems, digital assistants, specialized directories, and social media channels, allowing businesses to easily update and maintain their information. The platform facilitates the centralized management of diverse data points, including store details (name, address, phone number, holiday hours), professional credentials (headshots, areas of expertise, educational background), job specifications (title, description), and frequently asked questions. Yext primarily serves organizations within the healthcare, retail, and financial services sectors.

Analyst Sentiment

50%
Hold

From 1 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $8.20

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$7

Median

$8

High Bound

$11

Average

$8

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$8.20
▲ +50.18% Upside
Low Target
$7.00
28% Risk
Median Target
$8.00
47% Mid
High Target
$10.50
92% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 YEXT INC (YEXT) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Yext provides an enterprise platform that centralizes “knowledge” about locations, offerings, and services and then distributes that information to downstream digital surfaces (enterprise websites, search and discovery experiences, and partner ecosystems). The workflow typically follows a repeatable pattern: customers maintain a structured content layer (often spanning multiple locations and business units), Yext normalizes and manages that data, and the platform syndicates it to channels where customers are searched for and evaluated. Over time, this creates a persistent operating loop between content governance, data quality, and customer-facing digital experiences—making the platform part of how enterprises manage visibility and customer information, not merely a one-time marketing tool.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Yext’s monetization is primarily subscription-based, driven by platform usage across customer organizations and their locations. Revenue components generally include:

  • Recurring SaaS subscriptions tied to content management, syndication, and publishing features.
  • Usage- or module-dependent add-ons as customers expand from basic listing management into broader knowledge workflows and AI-driven answer experiences.
  • Professional services and implementation that support onboarding and integrations (typically not the core of long-term earnings power).

Margin drivers center on software scalability (incremental distribution/publishing costs are typically lower than the cost to produce and curate high-quality content), the mix shift toward higher-value modules, and continued improvement in customer retention and expansion through broader deployments. Ultimately, subscription renewal behavior and upsell into deeper data/experience capabilities are the key determinants of sustainable margin structure.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Yext’s moat is best characterized as high switching costs / data gravity plus process and workflow embedment in multi-location enterprises.

  • Switching Costs (Content & Workflow Lock-In): Enterprises build structured knowledge, establish content governance, and integrate workflows. Migrating that structured dataset and operational process away from Yext can be costly in time, change-management effort, and risk to data quality.
  • Data Gravity & Intangible Asset Accumulation: Over time, the platform becomes the system of record for specific knowledge domains (locations, services, policies, and other customer-critical attributes). The value of that knowledge layer rises with completeness and repeat usage.
  • Integration Ecosystem: Yext typically sits in an integration-heavy environment (web properties, internal systems, and publishing endpoints). The “cost to rewire” is often non-trivial for large operators.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Uberall — stronger emphasis on local marketing and location advertising/engagement workflows; competitive overlap exists around syndication and local discovery use cases, but Uberall’s center of gravity is often more campaign/engagement oriented.
  • Thryv (and legacy local marketing/SaaS platforms) — targets a broad base of SMB and mid-market needs with offerings that can include listings and reputation-adjacent services; the competitive dynamic can tilt toward breadth of SMB tooling rather than deep enterprise knowledge governance.
  • Synup — focuses heavily on local listings management and review/reputation workflows; competitive overlap exists around maintaining consistent information across directories, but Yext’s differentiation is more strongly tied to structured knowledge management and AI/answer experiences layered on top of that data.

Yext’s industry focus tends to skew toward enterprises that operate at scale (especially multi-location operators) where consistent knowledge across channels and business processes drives measurable customer experience outcomes. Versus rivals that may differentiate more by directory coverage, marketing services, or reputation management, Yext’s positioning emphasizes centralized knowledge operations that can power multiple customer-facing digital surfaces.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Enterprise shift toward governed, structured customer information: As businesses expand omnichannel touchpoints, the ability to maintain accurate, consistent knowledge becomes an operational advantage.
  • Local and multi-location digitization: Multi-site organizations face persistent complexity in keeping location-specific facts current; the total addressable market expands with the number of managed locations and the number of publishing surfaces.
  • AI-driven discovery and answer experiences: Search and discovery increasingly depend on structured data and knowledge representations. Platforms that can translate internal knowledge into externally usable answers can capture incremental demand.
  • Platform expansion inside existing accounts: Growth often comes less from net-new logo acquisition alone and more from widening deployments within the same enterprise—adding modules, integrating more systems, and extending coverage across regions and business units.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Platform dependency risk: Changes in how search and discovery ecosystems consume information (and the required formats/permissions) can pressure feature roadmaps and update cycles.
  • Competitive pressure and pricing normalization: Listings and local discovery adjacent markets can become commoditized, increasing sales cycles or reducing expansion rates.
  • Data quality and operational execution: The value delivered to customers hinges on accuracy and governance; implementation failures or data inconsistencies can drive churn.
  • AI commoditization: As generic AI capabilities diffuse, differentiation may depend more on proprietary data workflows, integration depth, and customer-specific governance rather than standalone model outputs.
  • Compliance and privacy requirements: Enterprises may impose strict data governance constraints around content, analytics, and integrations.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market for software platforms like Yext typically prices the business using subscription revenue quality and forward growth expectations rather than near-term earnings alone. Common valuation frameworks include EV/Revenue or EV/ARR, complemented by gross margin trajectory, retention, and net revenue expansion. The key variables that tend to move valuation are durable recurring revenue, evidence of scalable customer acquisition/expansion, and operating leverage driven by software distribution economics.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Yext is positioned to benefit from the ongoing enterprise need to centralize and govern structured customer knowledge for multi-channel discovery and AI-assisted experiences. The long-term thesis rests on data gravity and switching costs created by integrating knowledge workflows into daily operations for large multi-location customers. While competition in local listings and discovery is persistent, Yext’s differentiation is strongest where enterprises prioritize governed knowledge operations over standalone directory management.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-04-30

"Yext (2026-04-30, Q1) reported Revenue of $107.9M and Net Income of $2.6M (EPS $0.02). QoQ, revenue fell 3.6% ($112.0M in 2026-01-31) and net income dropped 37.7% ($4.2M in Q4). YoY, revenue declined 1.5% (from $109.5M in 2025-04-30) while net income surged to $2.6M from $0.8M (+241% YoY), indicating meaningful improvement in profitability versus the prior-year quarter. Profitability was mixed across the 4-quarter window: gross margin stayed strong (about 73% in Q1 2026) but operating and net margins contracted materially QoQ (net margin 2.4% vs 3.8% in Q4). Cash flow quality improved this quarter with operating cash flow of $37.4M and free cash flow of $37.0M, despite continued aggressive capital returns via buybacks (common stock repurchased $142.0M in Q1, which drove a $63.8M net cash decline). Balance sheet resilience is moderate: cash and equivalents were $91.9M and total equity was ~$24.5M (down from $159.4M in Q4), implying ongoing dilution/accretion or balance-sheet volatility. With Yext’s stock down 38.98% over 1 year, total shareholder return is likely negative; dividends are zero and buybacks appear to be the primary capital return mechanism. Analyst targets (consensus ~$8.2) are above the current ~$3.71, suggesting upside if profitability normalizes."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue was $107.9M in 2026-04-30. QoQ revenue decreased 3.6% (vs $112.0M in 2026-01-31). YoY revenue declined 1.5% (vs $109.5M in 2025-04-30), showing a mild contraction overall.

Profitability

Fair

Net income was $2.6M in Q1 2026 vs $4.2M QoQ (-37.7%) and vs $0.8M YoY (+241%). Net margin weakened QoQ (2.4% vs 3.8%) but improved materially vs last year’s low base.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was $37.4M and free cash flow $37.0M in Q1 2026—strong QoQ versus $28.6M FCF in Q4. However, buybacks were heavy ($142.0M repurchased), contributing to a $63.8M cash decline.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Equity is thin at ~$24.5M in 2026-04-30 (down from ~$159.4M in 2026-01-31), indicating balance-sheet volatility. Total assets declined QoQ to ~$499M. Net debt remains modestly negative (-$14.8M), but capital structure appears stressed by equity compression.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Market performance was weak: 1Y change -38.98% and YTD -52.74%. Dividend yield is 0%. Buybacks are substantial but price momentum is decisively negative, implying poor total return for shareholders over the last year.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Current price ~$3.71 versus consensus target ~$8.2 implies upside (~+121%). High multiple optics (per ratios) suggest the market remains cautious; valuation support exists if execution improves.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

So What?: Management is clearly pleased—calling Q1 a broad-based outperformance and pointing to improving gross and net retention (ARR basis), plus an FX tailwind as a contributor to revenue/ARR momentum. However, the Q&A shows why investors still want caution: the company does not provide a full-year revenue framework, and management repeatedly attributes their “conservative” outlook to macro uncertainty (while stating no direct tariff impact). Operationally, the clearest traction is Scout: publicly launched April 2, with <10 development partners in advance, then a public beta that reached ~45 live customers by the time of the call (37 added in ~48 hours). Management claims very high value perception and a 0% disinterest rate, but also offers no general availability date yet—keeping timing risk on the table. The debt facility with BlackRock is framed as flexibility for disciplined M&A as credit conditions and SVB facility expiration approach.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Yext Scout AI search/visibility product momentum (open beta rolling out customers since April 2 Analyst Day)
  • Improving gross and net retention (basis on ARR) supporting continued revenue/ARR durability
  • AI-driven fragmentation of consumer search market increasing need for digital visibility management

Business Development

  • Scout: development partner cohort ("less than 10" partners in advance; early public beta rollout expanding to ~45 live customers)
  • Acquisition integration referenced as recently completed: Hearsay (strategic, highly accretive) and Places Scout (product-led)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Management stated Q1 outperformance versus guidance on all metrics (no quantified EPS/Revenue figures provided in transcript)
  • FX tailwind: improvement in revenue and ARR attributed to FX rates abating vs prior pound headwinds; Q1 FX rates "roughly in line" with Q1 last year
  • Direct retention improvement driving ARR: gross and net retention on an ARR basis disclosed as improving (no explicit bps/% disclosed in transcript)
  • No direct tariff impact mentioned; however macro uncertainty cited as reason outlook remains conservative

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Buyback cadence: management indicated buybacks were active in Q1 and continued buying in May; no dollar/share amount disclosed
  • Debt/credit: BlackRock partner facility added; stated SVB credit facility expires end of calendar year and was used for collateralizing letters of credit with leases
  • Balance sheet flexibility referenced as enabling reinvestment and opportunistic M&A; no cash runway quantified

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Scout rollout mechanics: official launch at Analyst Day April 2; initial incremental rollout to customers (37 customers over last 48 hours from 'as of yesterday'); positioned as open beta with controlled capacity
  • Sales capacity posture: management sees room to run with current headcount; will be opportunistic on adding headcount based on demand signals and productivity
  • Product differentiation narrative: using Scout to demonstrate value of core offerings (listings, reviews, Pages, social) and reduce commoditization pressure

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • No full-year top-line outlook provided in Q&A; outlook characterized as "conservative" due to macro uncertainty
  • No date given for Scout general availability ("don’t have a date yet")

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Macro uncertainty lingering caution: management said primary caution is macro (analyst asked about balancing momentum with macro)
  • Tariffs: management explicitly said there is no direct impact on their business from tariffs mentioned in response
  • Search market competition/fragmentation risk translating into commoditization pressure vs incumbents: stated they have been fighting "good enough at half price" pressure for years (especially listings) which can impact customer value perception and churn (mitigation: focus on best-in-class products + Scout demonstrates differentiation)
  • Competitive benchmark shift: Google dip below 90% market share recently (worse measure because only traditional search; management argues fragmentation drives more search rather than less)

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the YEXT Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Yext, Inc. (YEXT) Financial Profile