Altimmune, Inc.

Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) Market Cap

Altimmune, Inc. has a market capitalization of $261.2M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31

Price: $2.96

0.07 (2.42%)

Market Cap: 261.24M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Jerome Benedict Durso

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Biotechnology

IPO Date: 2017-05-26

Website: https://altimmune.com

Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) - Company Information

Market Cap: 261.24M · Sector: Healthcare

Altimmune, Inc., a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, focuses on developing treatments for obesity and liver diseases. The company's lead product candidate, pemvidutide (proposed INN, formerly known as ALT-801), is a GLP-1/glucagon dual receptor agonist that is in Phase 1b trial for the treatment of obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. It is also developing HepTcell, an immunotherapeutic product candidate, which is in Phase 2 clinical trial for patients chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus. The company was formerly known as Vaxin Inc. and changed its name to Altimmune, Inc. in September 2015. Altimmune, Inc. was founded in 1997 is headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Analyst Sentiment

77%
Strong Buy

Based on 15 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $20.00

Average target (based on 3 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$20

Median

$20

High

$20

Average

$20

Potential Upside: 575.7%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 ALTIMMUNE INC (ALT) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

ALTIMMUNE INC operates as a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on immunology-driven therapies. The value chain is typical of biotech: discovery and preclinical validation of therapeutic candidates, followed by clinical development to generate efficacy and safety evidence required for regulatory approval. Monetisation then occurs through commercialization of approved therapies (if internalized), or through licensing/partnerships for candidates, IP, and platform capabilities.

Customer “stickiness” is not expressed through subscriptions or switching costs in the traditional sense; instead, stickiness arises from regulatory-grade evidence, IP ownership, and physician adoption once products gain label and reimbursement pathways. In drug development, the durable differentiation is embodied in data packages and exclusivity rights that are difficult to replicate quickly.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

For companies with developmental-stage portfolios, near-term revenue often stems from a mix of: (1) collaboration and licensing agreements (upfront payments, milestone payments, and potential royalties), and (2) contracted services or research support where applicable. In a commercial scenario, revenue shifts toward product sales and recurring demand driven by treatment protocols, reimbursement coverage, and patient persistence.

Margin drivers differ by stage:

  • Clinical/early stage economics: margins are largely irrelevant; value is driven by probability-weighted progress and the cost of capital needed to sustain the pipeline.
  • Commercial economics (post-approval): gross margin becomes influenced by manufacturing scale, supply chain reliability, formulation complexity, and field-market execution (pricing, payer access, and distribution).

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The most relevant “moat” for ALTIMMUNE is intangible assets rather than switching costs or network effects:

  • IP and exclusivity: Proprietary compositions, methods, and development know-how can provide legal protection and time-bounded market exclusivity, delaying direct competition.
  • Regulatory-grade clinical data: The ability to generate and maintain high-quality efficacy/safety evidence creates an informational barrier. Competitors can pursue similar targets, but replicating a comparable clinical package requires substantial time, cost, and risk tolerance.
  • Platform learning and translational capability: Iterative improvements in assay design, biomarker strategy, and trial execution can enhance the efficiency of future programs. This “process knowledge” compounds over time and is difficult to copy.

In practical terms, competitors can enter the same therapeutic area, but capturing meaningful share typically depends on winning the evidence and regulatory approvals battle rather than on price competition alone—an environment where intangible assets carry disproportionate weight.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is primarily governed by pipeline conversion and market expansion dynamics:

  • Pipeline milestones with asymmetric value: Each successful clinical inflection point (dose selection, statistically meaningful efficacy, and safety confirmation) can increase the probability of approval and the strategic value of the asset.
  • TAM expansion through disease-state penetration: Even within a fixed indication, long-term growth often depends on widening usage—new lines of therapy, expanded patient subgroups, and improved payer acceptance.
  • Platform optionality: A credible immunology platform can support multiple shots on goal, increasing the chance that at least one program reaches a commercially sustainable adoption curve.
  • Partnering leverage: Licensing and co-development can extend runway and reduce dilution risk, enabling faster portfolio progression when managed prudently.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Clinical and regulatory risk: Trial outcomes drive intrinsic value; safety signals, insufficient efficacy, or regulatory setbacks can materially impair expected cash flows.
  • Financing and dilution risk: Development timelines often require capital; additional equity or debt can dilute holders and increase required returns.
  • Competitive and substitution risk: New entrants, alternative mechanisms, or superior efficacy/safety profiles in the same patient population can reduce addressable share.
  • Manufacturing and supply risk: For biologics, scale-up, formulation stability, and quality systems can become limiting factors during commercialization.
  • Commercialization execution risk: Payer coverage, pricing dynamics, and prescriber uptake determine how quickly a product penetrates the market after approval.
  • Regulatory and reimbursement uncertainty: Shifts in endpoint standards, labeling requirements, or coverage criteria can impact demand.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value clinical biopharma firms using asset-based frameworks and probability-weighted valuation (e.g., risk-adjusted NPV of pipeline cash flows). As a result, conventional multiples (such as earnings-based metrics) often provide limited signal when profits are not yet meaningful.

Key valuation drivers in this sector tend to be:

  • Probability of success by program stage (efficacy, safety, and endpoint credibility)
  • Capital efficiency and runway (cost control relative to value creation)
  • Commercial potential (peak sales potential, duration of exclusivity, competitive landscape)
  • Quality of IP and defensibility (claim scope, formulation/method protection)

Narratives that translate into measurable clinical progress and credible regulatory pathways typically receive the largest re-rating potential.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

ALTIMMUNE’s long-term investment case is anchored by an intangible-asset moat—the combination of immunology-driven therapeutic development, proprietary IP, and regulatory-grade clinical evidence. Value creation hinges on converting pipeline milestones into approvals and establishing durable market adoption once products reach commercialization, with risks dominated by clinical uncertainty and financing needs. An investor’s core task is to underwrite the probability-weighted pathway from development to realized, defensible revenue.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-31

"For ALT (most recent quarter/period ended 2025-12-31), revenue was 26.0B with net income of -27.4M and EPS of -0.27, resulting in a negative net margin. Free cash flow was -19.4M (operating cash flow -19.4M; capex ~-1.0k), indicating cash generation remained pressured. On the balance sheet, ALT reported 279.9M in total assets versus 55.0M in total liabilities, leaving 224.9M equity. Net debt was -8.1M, suggesting net cash rather than net leverage. From a fundamentals perspective, the key issue is profitability: EPS is negative and the company’s operating cash flow has not offset losses, leading to sustained negative free cash flow. Leverage appears manageable given positive equity and net cash, which can provide runway while operations stabilize. On capital return, dividends were last recorded in early 2017, and no recent dividends are reflected; buybacks are not provided. Valuation context is limited without market cap and FCF yield, but the market performance has been weak (down -38.4% over 1 year), which weighs on shareholder returns. Analyst price target data is provided at a flat consensus of 20, but the current price shown is 3.08, implying a large gap versus targets."

Revenue Growth

Fair

Revenue level is reported at 26.0B, but the dataset does not provide YoY/quarter-over-quarter growth, so trend/stability cannot be assessed.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income of -27.4M and EPS of -0.27 point to negative profitability and a negative net margin; results are not currently covering expenses at the earnings level.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow of -19.4M and free cash flow of -19.4M indicate cash generation is weak. Capex is minimal (~-1.0k) and does not appear to be a meaningful offset.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Balance sheet shows 279.9M assets vs 55.0M liabilities with 224.9M equity. Net debt is -8.1M (net cash), suggesting resilience despite losses.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total shareholder returns appear challenged: the stock is down -38.4% over 1 year. Dividends are not present in recent periods, and buybacks are not provided.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

A consensus price target of 20 is provided versus a current price of 3.08, but valuation ratios (P/E, FCF yield) and market cap are missing; sentiment/valuation support cannot be fully validated.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

So what: Management is broadly upbeat on Phase III readiness and differentiation of PEMB (dual glucagon/GLP-1 with slower absorption via U-port) backed by MATCH signals (NASH resolution at 24 weeks; antifibrotic effect at 48 weeks; 1.8 mg dose response). CEO and clinical leaders emphasize momentum into 2026 and stress FDA alignment on a biopsy-driven accelerated approval path with ~990 patients and a powered design (>90% on specified endpoints). However, the Q&A reveals concrete friction points: FDA previously deemed NITs “premature” as registrational endpoints, limiting near-term flexibility even though management believes the agency could move over time. Operationally, the rate-limiting steps are largely “finalize protocol/execute,” but tolerability remains an acknowledged hurdle—early GI AEs in Phase II drove a planned 1–2 step titration mitigation. Analyst pressure centered on protocol flexibility and start-up timelines; management largely responded with “no change needed” on approval path, but offered limited numeric timing detail beyond “as we progress through this year.”

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Phase II MATCH: early NASH resolution at 24 weeks and antifibrotic activity at 48 weeks
  • Phase II 48-week dose-response supports Phase III focus on 1.8 mg, with upside option to evaluate 2.4 mg
  • FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation in NASH
  • Phase III pivotal design aligned with FDA for accelerated approval (52-week histology-based endpoint)

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Q4 2025 R&D: $18.4M vs $19.8M YoY (variance due to end of Phase IIb trial late 2025)
    • Q4 2025 R&D detail: $12.8M direct PEMB costs (IMPACT $3.1M; AUD/ALD Phase II $7.4M; CMC $1.2M)
    • Q4 2025 G&A: $10.5M vs $5.1M YoY (executive transition stock/payroll charge $2.6M plus higher professional fees/comp)
    • Net loss: $27.4M, or $0.27/share (2025) vs $23.2M or $0.33/share (2024)
    • Full-year 2025 cash OpEx: ~$67.5M excluding noncash compensation of $16M
    • No revenue/EPS beat/miss, bps margin changes, or explicit tax/tariff impacts mentioned in transcript

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Capital raise: $75M registered direct offering (announced in January) with Al Eskan Investment Group
    • Additional financing: ~$8M raised off ATM in January
    • Total cash at year-end 2025: ~ $274M
    • Prior year net proceeds: ~$208M total (≈$174M net equity capital raised; ~$35M via Hercules tranche loan facility)
    • Pro forma cash position (post-Jan raises): ~ $340M (referenced as of February)
    • Operating cash runway forecast: into 2028 based on current expectations for NASH Phase III plan plus AUD/ALD Phase II costs
    • No explicit debt level beyond the Hercules tranche reference; no buyback disclosed

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Strengthening late-stage organization foundation after CEO transition (Jan 2026) via new leaders across liver disease, late-stage clinical development, commercial strategy, etc.
    • Phase III operational setup: finalizing protocol and operational plan; parallel regulatory execution across FDA + Europe (EMA) + MHRA
    • Phase III tolerability mitigation plan: incorporate simple 1- or 2-step monthly titration to address early GI adverse event timing seen in Phase II (IMPACT) where GI events predominantly occurred in first 1–2 months
    • Phase III dosing/titration: start at 1.2 mg in each arm; titrate monthly to 1.8 mg or 2.4 mg

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Phase III program size/timing framework: start “as we progress through this year” (no specific start date given); enrollment/top-line timing not numerically specified
    • Phase II AUD RECLAIM: completed enrollment in 2025; expects topline in Q3 of this year
    • Phase II ALD RESTORE: continuing enrollment; expects to complete later in 2026

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • FDA stance on NITs as registrational endpoints: at end-of-Phase II, agency said it was “premature” to consider NITs; biopsy-driven endpoints retained as primary for accelerated approval
    • Potential future flexibility on NITs: management said agency is “slowly moving” toward NIT-based consideration, but no commitment to registrational change yet
    • NASH patient population focus: current plan centered on F2/F3; management acknowledged F4 potential but stated “current focus is clearly on the F2, F3” and that F4 execution/timeline work is not prioritized now
    • Tolerability/early GI tolerability risk: GI adverse events were predominantly concentrated in first 1–2 months in IMPACT Phase II, prompting titration plan for Phase III (mitigation step)
    • Emerging single-pivotal-framework uncertainty: FDA’s new “single pivotal framework” discussed by analyst; management said it “does not really apply” to Altimmune because their approval path remains “one single trial for accelerated approval and then all the way to final approval for clinical outcomes”

    Sentiment: POSITIVE

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ALT Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    📁

    SEC Filings (ALT)

    © 2026 Stock Market Info — Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) Financial Profile