Sierra Bancorp

Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) Market Cap

Sierra Bancorp has a market capitalization of β€”.

No quote data available.

CEO: Kevin J. McPhaill

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1994-04-18

Website: https://www.bankofthesierra.com

Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Sierra Bancorp serves as the holding company for Bank of the Sierra, providing a full suite of retail and commercial banking services to individuals and businesses across California. The institution offers diverse deposit solutions, including checking, savings, money market, time deposits, retirement, and sweep accounts. Its lending portfolio encompasses agricultural, commercial, consumer, real estate, construction, and mortgage loans. Additionally, the company facilitates access to automated teller machines (ATMs), electronic point-of-sale payment options, online and automated telephone banking, and business-focused services such as remote deposit capture and automated payroll. As of December 31, 2021, Sierra Bancorp operated 35 full-service branches, an online branch, a loan production office, an agricultural credit center, and an SBA center. Founded in 1977, its corporate headquarters are located in Porterville, California.

Analyst Sentiment

57%
Buy

From 5 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $44.00

β–² +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$44

Median

$44

High Bound

$44

Average

$44

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$44.00
β–² +7.95% Upside
Low Target
$44.00
8% Risk
Median Target
$44.00
8% Mid
High Target
$44.00
8% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ SIERRA BANCORP (BSRR) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Sierra Bancorp operates as a relationship-focused community/regional bank holding company. The core value creation mechanism is deposit gathering and balance-sheet intermediation: customer deposits fund a diversified loan portfolio and an investment securities book. Earnings then flow primarily through net interest income (the spread between asset yields and deposit/investment funding costs), supplemented by fee income tied to lending and deposit-related services.

Because banking products are delivered through local and account-level relationships (and because credit decisions are built on management’s ongoing underwriting and monitoring), customer behavior tends to be β€œsticky” when service quality and risk management remain consistent.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

1) Net interest income (NII) β€” primary profit engine.
NII is driven by (i) loan yields (rate sensitivity and portfolio mix), (ii) deposit betas and funding costs (particularly the cost of deposits), and (iii) interest-earning asset mix between loans and securities.

2) Noninterest income β€” typically smaller but important for diversification.
Common drivers include loan- and account-related fees (e.g., service fees, SBA/credit-related fees where applicable) and other banking income streams that reduce reliance on pure spread.

3) Asset quality and credit costs β€” an earnings stabilizer.
For banks, β€œmonetisation” also depends on how efficiently credit risk is priced and managed. Lower-than-expected credit losses preserve earnings power and reduce the earnings drag from provisions.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat: Credit culture and cost-of-deposits discipline supported by a relationship banking operating model. Community/regional banks compete less on product innovation and more on (i) underwriting discipline through the cycle, (ii) maintaining stable core deposits at reasonable rates, and (iii) operating efficiency. Those elements are difficult to replicate quickly because they require experienced risk management, mature loan documentation/monitoring processes, and a deposit franchise built over time.

  • Cost of deposits advantage: A bank’s ability to attract and retain stable deposits at controlled cost is a structural earnings driver. Competitors often struggle to match deposit stickiness without paying higher rates, which compresses spreads.
  • Credit culture / underwriting process: Strong credit discipline can limit loss severity and improve recovery outcomes, which compounds book value over time versus peers that take more credit risk or price risk inadequately.
  • Regulatory and operational moat: Banking is regulated and capital-intensive. Compliance, risk governance, and capital planning are ongoing requirements that raise the cost of β€œcopying” a successful model.

Competitive benchmarking (primary competitors):
Key competitors include other California/Western-focused community and regional banks such as Glacier Bancorp (GBCI), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC), and Opportunity/mission-similar regional peers operating with relationship-driven strategies and diversified commercial/small business lending.

Contrast: While these peers may overlap in customer segments and deposit-gathering efforts, Sierra Bancorp’s positioning depends on sustained deposit franchise quality and repeatable underwriting/monitoring practices rather than scale-driven pricing power.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Stable demand for relationship lending: Middle-market and small business borrowers value responsive credit decisions, particularly when they require tailored structuring and ongoing monitoring.
  • Balance-sheet growth with disciplined risk appetite: Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is most sustainable when loan expansion is paired with conservative credit underwriting and appropriate pricing of risk.
  • Deposit franchise compounding: Growth in core deposits (and improved deposit mix) tends to lower funding costs over time and supports incremental earnings through the cycle.
  • Credit normalization and operating leverage: In the absence of deterioration in underwriting, credit costs returning toward historical norms and improving operating efficiency can expand earnings power.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Interest rate and balance-sheet sensitivity: Changes in the yield curve and deposit pricing dynamics can compress net interest margins if asset repricing and deposit betas diverge.
  • Credit cycle risk: Weakening in commercial real estate, small business credit performance, or regional economic stress can elevate charge-offs and provisions.
  • Liquidity and funding volatility: Concentration in particular deposit types or sudden shifts in customer funding behavior can increase funding costs.
  • Regulatory and capital constraints: Higher capital requirements or more restrictive supervisory expectations can limit growth and increase compliance costs.
  • Competitive deposit pressure: Peer competition for deposits may force higher rates, especially during funding-constrained environments.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

Equity markets typically value banks using a blend of price-to-book (P/TBV), earnings power, and tangible book value durability, with additional emphasis on profitability and credit quality metrics such as efficiency and asset-quality indicators.

Key valuation drivers tend to include:

  • Return on tangible equity and earnings consistency (ability to generate profits without frequent, large credit write-downs).
  • Net interest margin durability (linked to deposit beta behavior and asset mix).
  • Credit performance (charge-off trends and loss severity).
  • Deposit mix and cost discipline (stability of core deposits and resistance to adverse funding repricing).

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

Sierra Bancorp’s long-term investment case rests on the durability of its relationship-driven deposit franchise and the repeatability of its underwriting and credit culture. In a sector where β€œmoats” are less about brand and more about cost of funds, risk discipline, and regulatory/operational competence, sustained control of funding costs and loss outcomes can translate into resilient earnings power and compounding tangible book value over time.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"BSRR reported Q2’26 revenue of $49.5M and net income of $9.92M (EPS $0.78). On a YoY basis, revenue rose ~1.9% (49.51M vs. 49.04M in Q2’25) while net income declined ~6.7% (9.92M vs. 10.63M). QoQ, revenue was essentially flat (+0.7%) and net income decreased ~20.8% (down from $12.52M in Q1’26), indicating some quarter-specific profitability pressure. Margins were mixed across the quarter set. Gross margin declined from 78.4% (Q1’26) to 74.3% (Q2’26). Net margin also fell to 20.0% from 25.5% in Q1’26. Although operating income in Q2’26 was $13.3M, it was below Q1’26 levels. Cash flow quality weakened on a QoQ basis: operating cash flow was $5.48M in Q2’26 versus $11.1M in Q1’26. Still, the company maintained free cash flow of ~$5.6M. Balance sheet resilience appears supported by sizable liquidity (cash + short-term investments ~ $1.04B) and moderate leverage (net debt ~$65M). Total shareholder return looks strong given price momentum: the stock is up 47.3% over the last year, with a modest dividend yield (~0.65%). Analyst valuation appears conservative/neutral with a $44 consensus target vs. $37.2 current price (~18% upside)."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

YoY revenue +1.9% in Q2’26; QoQ revenue +0.7%, indicating stable but not accelerating top-line.

Profitability

Fair

Net income YoY -6.7% and QoQ -20.8%. Net margin contracted to 20.0% from 25.5% in Q1’26; gross margin also declined (78.4% -> 74.3%).

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Free cash flow positive at ~$5.6M in Q2’26, but operating cash flow fell QoQ ($5.48M vs. $11.07M). Dividend paid $3.40M; buybacks were modest ($5.0M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Strong liquidity (cash + short-term investments ~$1.04B) and low net debt (~$65M). Equity broadly stable (~$367M in Q2’26).

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total return tailwind: price momentum +47.3% over 1Y materially supports shareholder returns; dividend yield ~0.65% adds incremental income.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target $44 vs. $37.2 current implies ~18% upside; valuation signals constructive sentiment despite near-term profit softness.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” Sierra Bancorp (BSRR) Financial Profile