Dominion Energy, Inc.

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) Market Cap

Dominion Energy, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Robert Blue

Sector: Utilities

Industry: Regulated Electric

IPO Date: 1980-03-17

Website: https://www.dominionenergy.com

Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Utilities

Company Profile

Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, Dominion Energy, Inc., founded in 1983 (and formerly known as Dominion Resources, Inc.), is a prominent American energy firm primarily engaged in the generation and supply of power across the United States. The company's operations are divided into four primary divisions. The Dominion Energy Virginia division is responsible for the regulated production, transmission, and local delivery of electricity, serving an estimated 2.7 million residential, commercial, industrial, and governmental clients throughout Virginia and North Carolina. Its Gas Distribution segment oversees the regulated sale, transport, collection, storage, and local delivery of natural gas. This segment caters to approximately 3.1 million residential, commercial, and industrial customers spread across Ohio, West Virginia, North Carolina, Utah, southwestern Wyoming, and southeastern Idaho. Furthermore, it operates several unregulated facilities dedicated to renewable natural gas production. Within the Dominion Energy South Carolina division, the company provides electricity generation, transmission, and distribution services to roughly 772,000 customers residing in the central, southern, and southwestern regions of South Carolina. Concurrently, it manages natural gas distribution for an additional 419,000 residential, commercial, and industrial consumers within the state. The Contracted Assets segment comprises non-regulated ventures, specifically focusing on the development and operation of long-term contracted renewable electric generation and solar facilities. This segment also includes gas transportation, liquefied natural gas (LNG) import and storage operations, as well as a dedicated liquefaction plant. As of December 31, 2021, Dominion Energy commanded an extensive asset portfolio, featuring approximately 30.2 gigawatts of electricity generating capacity, complemented by 10,700 miles of electric transmission infrastructure, 78,000 miles of electric distribution networks, and 95,700 miles of natural gas distribution mains and associated service lines.

Analyst Sentiment

55%
Buy

From 16 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $70.71

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$67

Median

$71

High Bound

$76

Average

$71

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$70.71
▲ +2.23% Upside
Low Target
$67.00
-3% Risk
Median Target
$71.00
3% Mid
High Target
$76.00
10% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 DOMINION ENERGY INC (D) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Dominion Energy operates a regulated energy network that converts large, capital-intensive infrastructure into stable cash flows. The company’s core “how it works” is grounded in (1) delivering electricity and natural gas through a geographically defined service territory and (2) earning returns on regulated assets—primarily through distribution/transmission for power and gas delivery/transport for gas.

Because energy is a network business, Dominion’s value chain depends on long-lived grid and pipeline assets, ongoing system maintenance, and coordination with state regulators. The economic outcome is shaped less by customer acquisition and more by asset utilization, reliability, and regulatory outcomes that determine how efficiently capital spending translates into earnings (via rate base and allowed returns).

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Dominion’s monetisation is dominated by regulated revenue streams that are designed to be recurring and resilient. The principal drivers include:

  • Regulated electric distribution and transmission: revenue tied to delivering and maintaining the grid; margin primarily reflects the regulatory framework that translates prudently spent capital into earnings.
  • Regulated natural gas distribution and related infrastructure: customer charges and delivery economics where volumes and tariff structures determine the revenue profile; infrastructure reliability and throughput support cash generation.
  • Supply and contracted services: where applicable, portions of performance can be influenced by fuel or commodity pass-throughs and contract terms, though the economic core remains infrastructure-backed.

Overall, the margin profile is most sensitive to (1) regulatory-approved returns, (2) rate case timing and outcome, (3) operating cost discipline, and (4) capex execution that sustains reliability without cost overruns.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Dominion’s moats are primarily regulatory franchise + network economics rather than product differentiation. Competitors can build generation, but replicating a regulated distribution/transmission or gas delivery footprint is difficult, slow, and capital-heavy.

Moat elements:

  • Switching costs / service territory lock-in: residential and commercial customers typically cannot switch distribution or gas delivery providers in the same service area. Network access is granted through regulated utilities, creating structural customer stickiness.
  • Logistical infrastructure scale: pipelines, storage, balancing capabilities, substations, and distribution networks form a physical barrier. Asset ownership and operational know-how reduce interruption risk and support reliable service.
  • Geographic cost advantage in gas logistics: Dominion’s gas value chain benefits from access to North American natural gas supply sources and the ability to move that supply into its regulated footprint through dedicated transportation and storage infrastructure. Proximity and network design can lower effective delivered gas costs versus a less integrated logistics position.
  • Regulatory moat (permitted returns and rate base framework): consistent navigation of filing strategy, cost recovery, and capital planning can influence how efficiently the company converts capex into earnings.

Competitive benchmarking (geography and business mix):

  • Duke Energy (DUK): also operates regulated power and gas businesses, but with a different geographic footprint and a different generation/regulatory mix.
  • Exelon (EXC): has meaningful generation and a different regulatory structure across markets, making its economics less purely “distribution-led” in focus.
  • American Electric Power (AEP) (AEP): competes in regulated transmission/distribution and related services in distinct regions, with different infrastructure footprints and rate-case dynamics.

Dominion’s positioning is defined by owning and operating the regulated networks in its service territory, emphasizing infrastructure reliability, gas logistics integration, and regulatory execution—rather than competing on retail product features.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is driven by the scale of planned infrastructure spending and the modernization of energy delivery systems, supported by long-duration demand fundamentals:

  • Grid modernization and reliability capex: stronger reliability standards, aging asset replacement, and resilience investments support sustained rate base growth where prudently approved.
  • Energy transition logistics: integrating new generation profiles and managing load shifts requires transmission/distribution upgrades that tend to be funded through regulated mechanisms.
  • Natural gas infrastructure and balancing: in markets where gas remains a dispatchable and heating fuel, pipeline and storage capability supports service continuity and can improve the economics of delivered supply.
  • Regulated growth through load development: demographic and economic activity can drive incremental throughput, improving utilization of existing assets and underpinning additional capital programs.

The total addressable “market” is not a new customer acquisition story; it is the pace at which regulated infrastructure can be deployed and converted into earnings through the rate-setting process.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory outcomes: adverse rate case decisions, disallowances, or changes to allowed returns can reduce earnings power and delay cash conversion.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: utility economics depend on capex discipline. Cost overruns, project delays, or under-forecasted maintenance needs can pressure returns.
  • Commodity and interest-rate sensitivity: while pass-through mechanisms can reduce exposure, certain cost components and financing costs can still influence earnings and credit metrics.
  • Policy and reliability compliance: evolving environmental and reliability standards can raise compliance costs and accelerate asset replacement cycles.
  • Technology and demand disruption: electrification at the margin, distributed energy resources, or load changes can alter throughput profiles even when service territories remain fixed.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value regulated utilities through a framework tied to earnings quality and balance-sheet stability rather than high-growth multiples. Key valuation sensitivities include:

  • Rate base growth and allowed returns: investors focus on how capex translates into regulated earnings under the prevailing regulatory regime.
  • Credit quality and funding costs: utilities are heavily capital-funded; capital structure strength affects the cost of equity and debt, influencing sustainable earnings.
  • Operational reliability and controllable expenses: disciplined operations protect the spread between allowed and incurred costs.
  • Regulatory visibility: clarity around filing strategy, recovery mechanisms, and timing reduces uncertainty premia.

Pragmatically, what “moves the needle” is the combination of regulatory confidence, execution quality on modernization programs, and the company’s ability to maintain stable credit metrics while funding long-duration assets.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Dominion Energy fits the classic regulated infrastructure model: durable customer stickiness from service territory structures, a physical logistics moat in gas transportation/storage, and a regulatory framework that can translate disciplined capex into steady earnings. The long-term thesis rests on credible regulatory execution and capex discipline supporting reliable cash generation over a multi-year modernization cycle, while downside risk centers on rate-setting uncertainty, execution/cost overruns, and compliance-driven cost growth.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"D reported 2026 Q2 revenue of $4.48B and net income of $0.37M (EPS not reported). On a YoY basis, revenue fell from $5.14B in 2025 Q2? (closest comparable provided: 2025-06-30 revenue $3.81B; however the same quarter last year is not present for 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30: revenue grew to $4.48B from $3.81B, +17.6%), while net income declined sharply from $760M in 2025 Q2 to $0.37M in 2026 Q2 (approximately -100% to -99.95%). QoQ, revenue decreased from $5.14B (2026 Q1) to $4.48B (2026 Q2, -12.9%), and net income dropped from $621M to $0.37M (about -99.9%). Profitability is deteriorating in Q2: operating margin slipped to 7.3% from 28.0% in Q1 and net margin compressed to ~0.0% (vs 12.1% in Q1). Despite this, operating cash flow in Q2 was strong at $512M and free cash flow was positive at ~$3.54B (driven by very large “other investing activities” and investment sales/maturities), but the magnitude swings make quality harder to normalize. Shareholder returns are supported by price momentum (1y_change +17.64%, positive but not >20%) and dividends paid of -$604M in Q2, indicating continued capital return alongside leverage. Balance sheet resilience appears mixed: total assets and equity rose versus earlier quarters, but leverage remains substantial with total debt ~$22.4B and net debt ~$22.4B."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue was $4.48B in 2026-06-30: down QoQ from $5.14B (2026-03-31, -12.9%) but up YoY versus 2025-06-30 ($3.81B, +17.6%).

Profitability

Neutral

Net income collapsed to $0.37M from $621M QoQ (-~99.9%) and from $760M YoY (~-100%). Operating margin fell to 7.3% from 28.0% QoQ, indicating major margin contraction.

Cash Flow Quality

Fair

Operating cash flow was $512M in Q2 (vs $882M in Q1). Free cash flow was strongly positive at ~$3.54B, but totals are highly volatile given large/offsetting investing line items, so cash-flow quality is less consistent.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Total assets/equity increased versus 2025-12-31, but the balance sheet still carries meaningful leverage (total debt ~$22.4B; net debt ~$22.4B). Liquidity metrics in the latest quarter are not provided (set to 0), limiting near-term resilience assessment.

Shareholder Returns

Fair

Total return is supported by share price appreciation (+17.64% over 1y) and ongoing dividends (dividends paid -$604M in Q2). No buybacks were shown in Q2 (repurchases 0).

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Price is $62.42 with consensus target ~$70.71 (implied upside ~13%). High price targets (76) suggest some bullish upside, but current-quarter profitability deterioration tempers conviction.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Dominion delivered a strong start to 2026 with Q1 operating earnings of $0.95/share (GAAP $0.69) while affirming full-year guidance and a 5%–7% growth profile biased toward the upper half starting 2028. The key driver is execution: CVOW is now over 75% complete, with major hardware milestones achieved and installation productivity improving to about two days per turbine in recent runs. However, the risk box is narrow but material—turbine schedule slippage beyond July 2027 adds $150M–$200M per quarter, and tariff/tariff-adjacent uncertainties remain, including potential ~$200M impacts from steel/aluminum (232) pending guidance, partially offset by possible PJM transmission cost reallocations that are not yet fully reflected in today’s marks. Strategic upside centers on Virginia’s expanded 20 GW by 2045 storage target enabling capital acceleration, while Millstone recontracting clarity should emerge later in 2026 with potential affordability-friendly, value-protecting outcomes.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Virginia legislation (HB 895 / SB 448) expanding grid-scale energy storage targets to 20 GW by 2045, vs prior 3 GW by 2035, creating incremental regulated capital deployment opportunities
  • Potential recontracting opportunity at Millstone expected to have increasing clarity later in 2026, framed as a win-win for Connecticut customers and potential nuclear value uplift
  • Accelerating, durable demand from differentiated, low-risk data center customers; large load provisions reduce stranded cost and protect existing customers

Business Development

  • Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW): PJM queue and transmission allocation frameworks; monitoring potential reassessment of network upgrade costs allocated to CVOW via PJM transition cycle and broader RTEP package
  • Millstone (Connecticut): DEEP zero-carbon energy RFP bid submitted in March; procurement decisions expected Q2 2026, negotiations with local state utilities begin Q3, and submissions to PURA with an up to 180-day approval timeline
  • Battery storage supply chain: working with importer-of-record partners to finalize 232 steel tariff impacts

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Operating earnings: $0.95/share in Q1 2026 vs GAAP earnings of $0.69/share; all guidance affirmed from prior Q4 call (operating earnings, credit, dividend, long-term growth)
  • Annual operating earnings growth guided to midpoint of 5%–7% range; bias starting in 2028 toward upper half
  • Credit metrics: full-year 2025 and Q1 LTM FFO-to-debt above 15% (no change to credit targets)
  • ATM funding: issued ~$1.2B common year-to-date; remaining $400M–$600M consistent with Q4 guidance
  • CVOW budget: $11.4B (down ~$100M vs last update); updated budget reflects tariffs changes from judicial/administrative actions; unused contingency $123M
  • Tariff mark: potential ~$200M impact from updated steel/aluminum (pending interpretive guidance), potentially partially offset by transmission cost reallocation uncertainty

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Common under ATM: ~$1.2B issued YTD; remaining ~$400M–$600M for remainder of year
  • Derisking CVOW: continued milestone progression with first power in March (funding/capital plan positioned to maintain cushion and credit strength)
  • Balance sheet target referenced: maintain financing plan supportive of maintaining >15% cushion; company stated it is already at cushion level (not ramping over time)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • CVOW construction execution: project >75% complete; 176 transition pieces installed; all three substations installed; deepwater export cables installed; inter-array cable installation on track; remaining cabling fabricated with majority landed in Virginia
  • Turbine fabrication progress: >86% towers, ~69% nacelles, ~45% blades fabricated
  • Turbine installation cadence improved: as of call date completed nine turbines; recently averaged ~two days per installation for last four turbines; improving weather windows into upcoming months
  • Process optimization: measure-twice-cut-once approach; ramp observed in earlier components (monopiles/transition pieces) as production learning curve progressed
  • AI/technology: deployed AI tools in contact center to improve visibility into customer needs and real-time sentiment for more precise, efficient service
  • Customer affordability/regulatory constructs: large load provisions approved in the 2025 biennial to prevent smaller customers subsidizing large customer classes; plan to pursue Virginia fuel securitization for unrecovered fuel costs to minimize rate impact

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Storage policy milestones: SB 448 / HB 895 require petitioning for 20 GW short- and long-term storage projects by 2045 (signed law); S.C.C. technical conference on storage topic this year
  • Capital update timing: will reflect storage opportunity and other regulated investment opportunities in a capital update early next year; IRP update in fall to reflect battery ramping
  • Millstone procurement timeline: solicitation decisions expected in Q2 2026; negotiations with local state utilities begin Q3 2026; PURA approval thereafter with timeline up to 180 days
  • South Carolina rate case: surrebuttal May 5; hearings mid-May; decision late June with rates effective July
  • Dominion Energy North Carolina rate case: decision expected February 2027; interim rates effective December 2026; subject to true-up and finalization in March 2027

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • CVOW schedule/cost exposure: if turbine installation extends beyond July 2027, each additional quarter to complete adds ~$150M–$200M to project cost (portion allocated to financing partner)
  • CVOW cost uncertainty: PJM network upgrade costs allocated to CVOW may be reassessed downward due to regional transmission projects being captured in both PJM transition cycle and subsequent RTEP award package (timing/mark impacts not yet reflected in today’s figures)
  • Tariff uncertainty: updated steel and aluminum (232) pending interpretive guidance; estimated potential ~$200M impact not yet finalized; may be partially offset by transmission cost reallocation (no exact precision on net effect)
  • Data center demand: management stated no detectable change despite PJM pricing/cost allocation uncertainty; implied risk remains tied to PJM constructs even if currently stable
  • Long-duration storage: still early; company has pilots underway evaluating technologies; lack of specificity introduces execution/technology risk

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Battery storage (HB 895/SB 448): Management tied the update to Virginia’s signed 20 GW by 2045 target, clarified the existing five-year plan already includes ~$2B (~3%) for batteries, and emphasized accelerating the ramp via S.C.C. technical conference, fall IRP update, and Q4 capital plan cadence. They quantified cost assumptions for gigawatt overnight installed including network upgrades.
  • CVOW impacts from PJM reallocation and steel/aluminum 232 tariffs: Management said today’s marks do not reflect potential transmission cost reallocation allocated to CVOW, which could be reassessed downward. They also took a tariff mark while awaiting agency interpretive guidance, estimating ~$200M range potentially offset by transmission reallocation, with net precision still pending supplier and agency details.
  • Millstone recontracting flexibility and nuclear/data center strategy: Management highlighted Millstone is contracted a little more than half through August 2029, with Connecticut DEEP procurement after PPA expiration and no cap on contracted quantities in the state process. They stated willingness to contract beyond ~55% and stressed stakeholder support for potential data center outcomes; they positioned nuclear development around first-of-a-kind, cost overrun risk protections, and balance-sheet protection.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the D Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) Financial Profile