Edison International

Edison International (EIX) Market Cap

Edison International has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Pedro J. Pizarro

Sector: Utilities

Industry: Regulated Electric

IPO Date: 1973-05-03

Website: https://www.edison.com

Edison International (EIX) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Utilities

Company Profile

Headquartered in Rosemead, California, and established in 1886, Edison International primarily operates through its subsidiaries to produce and supply electrical power. This utility company furnishes electricity to a vast client base of around 15 million, encompassing homes, businesses, industrial sites, governmental bodies, and agricultural enterprises throughout Southern, Central, and Coastal California. Beyond power delivery, Edison International also offers bespoke energy solutions tailored for its commercial and industrial clientele. Its extensive infrastructure includes a robust transmission network featuring lines that range from 55 kV to 500 kV, alongside numerous substations. The company's distribution system is equally substantial, comprising approximately 39,000 circuit-miles of overhead cabling, roughly 31,000 circuit-miles of underground lines, and 800 distribution substations.

Analyst Sentiment

57%
Buy

From 17 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $74.83

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$62

Median

$77

High Bound

$86

Average

$75

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$74.83
▲ +1.99% Upside
Low Target
$62.00
-15% Risk
Median Target
$76.50
4% Mid
High Target
$86.00
17% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 EDISON INTERNATIONAL (EIX) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Edison International is a holding company whose primary operating asset is Southern California Edison (SCE), a regulated electric utility serving a defined geographic territory in Southern California. The business model is built around owning and operating the distribution and transmission “wires” network and delivering electricity reliably to retail customers and eligible load. Revenue is largely determined through rate-setting processes that tie allowed returns to the utility’s invested capital (rate base), with operating costs and certain pass-through items recovered through tariffs and regulatory mechanisms.

This structure creates long-lived customer stickiness: individual customers generally cannot switch electricity providers for basic service within the utility’s franchise territory, and the utility’s physical network is capital-intensive to replicate. Grid reliability programs, system upgrades, and compliance obligations further reinforce the centrality of existing infrastructure.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

  • Regulated utility earnings on rate base: The core monetisation mechanism is cost-of-service regulation, where the utility recovers operating expenses and earns an allowed return on capital invested in grid assets (distribution, transmission, and related infrastructure).
  • Distribution and transmission services: Revenues are generated through tariffed charges tied to providing delivery services, including reliability, safety, and maintenance outcomes.
  • Fuel and purchased power pass-throughs (where applicable): Certain generation/commodity-related costs are typically recovered through regulatory constructs, reducing direct earnings volatility versus unregulated merchants, though timing and regulatory lag can still affect results.
  • Regulatory mechanisms and deferred balances: Timing differences between when costs are incurred and when they are recovered can create regulatory assets/liabilities that influence earnings pattern and cash conversion.

Margin drivers are therefore less dependent on pricing power and more dependent on: (1) the regulator’s approved allowed return, (2) capital plan scope and execution, (3) recovery of operating costs, and (4) effectiveness of risk management programs that reduce disallowances or non-recoverable costs.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Edison International’s moat is primarily geographic and regulatory, supported by the economics of a natural monopoly grid and the high cost of duplicating distribution/transmission infrastructure.

  • Geographic franchise & regulatory moat: SCE’s service territory grants a protected operating footprint. Rate-setting and obligations (reliability, safety, compliance) create barriers that competitors cannot easily bypass.
  • Logistical infrastructure / network scale: The physical distribution and transmission network is a long-lived asset base that benefits from scale, engineering know-how, and integrated operations across high-density demand and complex load patterns.
  • Operational switching constraints: Customer “switching” in retail electricity is limited within the utility’s regulated service construct for standard delivery service, reducing churn risk and supporting stable throughput for regulated services.
  • Risk-management capabilities: Grid hardening and reliability programs can become embedded capabilities with long planning horizons, lowering the probability of earnings-impacting regulatory outcomes.

COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (industry context):

  • Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E): similarly a California regulated utility, exposed to rate-base approval dynamics and wildfire/reliability risk considerations.
  • San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E): also a California regulated utility with comparable regulatory structures and capital requirements.
  • Other U.S. regulated utilities: outside California, competitors face different regulatory regimes and wildfire exposure profiles, but the central value driver remains rate-base recovery and allowed return frameworks.

Against these rivals, EIX’s differentiation is not a product innovation moat; it is the ability to execute capital programs and manage regulatory risk within a specific high-load, infrastructure-intensive geography—where rebuilding or effectively competing with the incumbent grid is economically prohibitive.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Electrification-driven load growth: Vehicle electrification, building electrification, and industrial demand shifts expand the utility’s addressable load and support grid modernization needs.
  • Renewable integration and grid resiliency: Higher renewable penetration increases the complexity of power delivery, raising demand for transmission/distribution upgrades, system automation, and reliability enhancements.
  • Infrastructure replacement cycles: Large, mature systems require sustained capital investment for safety, reliability, and compliance, supporting long-duration additions to rate base.
  • Grid hardening and wildfire mitigation: For the California operating context, resiliency investments and risk reduction programs can be a durable part of the capex agenda, with regulatory recovery pathways.
  • Distributed energy resource enablement: Integrating distributed generation, storage, and demand response often requires upgrades to distribution systems and operational capabilities.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory outcomes: Rate cases, cost recovery approvals, and the treatment of operational and compliance costs can materially change earnings power and cash flows.
  • Wildfire and liability risk: Catastrophic event likelihood, remediation requirements, and the boundary between insured/mitigated costs versus non-recoverable costs can affect financial performance.
  • Capital intensity and execution risk: Execution overruns, delays, or asset quality issues can pressure returns if not fully incorporated into regulatory constructs.
  • Financing and interest-rate sensitivity: Regulated utilities often rely on capital markets; higher financing costs can affect the spread between cost of capital and allowed returns.
  • Reliability and compliance: Failure to meet mandated reliability, safety, or grid performance metrics can create disallowances or additional mandated expenditures.
  • Technology and cyber risk: Grid modernization increases exposure to operational technology vulnerabilities and requires ongoing investment in cybersecurity.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets generally value regulated utilities using rate-base economics and cash flow durability rather than growth optionality. Valuation frameworks often emphasize metrics such as EV/EBITDA alongside utility-specific considerations: the expected trajectory of rate base, the stability of allowed returns, regulatory visibility of cost recovery, and capital discipline. In this sector, the key valuation drivers are typically:

  • Allowed return and cost recovery certainty (regulatory structure and outcomes).
  • Capital plan quality (scope, timing, and prudence findings).
  • Operating risk (reliability performance and event mitigation effectiveness).
  • Balance sheet strength (ability to fund capex without excessive dilution of credit quality).

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Edison International is a utility holding company with a defensible, long-duration investment profile anchored by a regulated geographic monopoly over essential electricity distribution and transmission infrastructure. The primary moat is the combination of regulatory franchise protection and high-cost logistical infrastructure that customers cannot economically replicate or bypass. Over a multi-year horizon, the investment case rests on electrification and resiliency-driven grid investment, tempered by the need for favorable regulatory cost recovery and effective management of wildfire, execution, and reliability risks.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"Q2’26 Revenue was $4.355B (QoQ +6.16%; YoY -4.17%). Net income was $561M (QoQ -1.58%; YoY +40.95%) and EPS was $1.39 (QoQ +0.73%; YoY +56.18%). Margins improved modestly vs Q1’26 at the operating level (operating margin 25.07% vs 26.18%—slight contraction), while the net margin edged down (12.88% vs 13.89%). Across the last four quarters, earnings appear more volatile than revenue: Q2’26 net income holds near Q1’26 levels despite revenue softness, suggesting cost/other items are doing some of the work. Operating cash flow in Q2’26 was $1.27B, but free cash flow was negative (-$576M), reflecting heavy capex and investment activity. Dividend payments were $299M in the quarter and remain the dominant financing use, consistent with a regulated utility shareholder-return profile. On shareholder returns, the stock shows strong momentum: +25.60% over 1 year with a ~1.04% dividend yield, implying a solid total-return backdrop. Balance-sheet trend data in the provided quarter series is less consistent (large swings in reported total assets and cash items), but equity remains positive (~$19.1B at Q2’26) with total debt reported at ~$2.54B and net debt ~$2.54B for the quarter snapshot. Overall: improving YoY earnings, strong price momentum, but cash flow/free-cash-flow pressure in the quarter tempers the quality score."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Q2’26 revenue $4.355B rose QoQ (+6.16%) but fell YoY (-4.17%), indicating a slightly weakening demand/price trend vs the prior year.

Profitability

Good

Net income grew YoY (+40.95%) and EPS rose YoY (+56.18%). Margins were slightly weaker sequentially: net margin 12.88% (Q2’26) vs 13.89% (Q1’26).

Cash Flow Quality

Fair

Operating cash flow was solid ($1.27B) but free cash flow was negative (-$576M) due to capex/investing outflows. Dividend outflows continued ($299M), while buybacks were minimal (-$4M).

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Fair

Equity is positive (~$19.1B) and appears stable vs prior quarters, but the provided balance-sheet series shows material inconsistencies in total assets/cash figures, limiting confidence in leverage resilience assessment.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total shareholder backdrop is strong: price +25.60% over 1 year plus ~1.04% dividend yield. Buybacks in Q2’26 were small, but momentum supports total return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Street target implies upside: consensus target $74 vs current price $70.75 (about +4.5%). With strong recent momentum, valuation is supported but not massively dislocated.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

EIX’s Q2 2026 performance starts the year with strong earnings visibility but is still anchored to California wildfire legislative “financeability.” Core EPS was $1.04 in the quarter and $2.97 year-to-date, with management reaffirming 2026 core EPS of $5.90–$6.20 and a long-term 5%–7% growth rate. Operational momentum centers on SCE’s wildfire mitigation ramp: RAMP filing in May, enhanced wildfire modeling, and tangible hardening progress (about 800 miles covered conductor and 90 miles undergrounding since Jan 2025). For funding, management highlighted a Woolsey securitization generating ~$2 billion and a Wildfire Fund prefunding mechanism enabling WRCP/subrogation reimbursement as the program crosses ~$1 billion. The key risk remains legislative uncertainty in Sacramento; management explicitly tied the next ~4 weeks to potential credit-rating downgrades (BBB- into non-investment-grade), which would lift the cost of capital and affect customer affordability and investment pace.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • SCE wildfire mitigation execution supporting next cycle hardening: ~450 miles covered conductor and ~190 miles targeted undergrounding in 2029–2032
  • AI-enabled operational analytics to accelerate design/permit cycles (targeting 20%–30% faster design cycles and ~20% permit cycle time reduction)
  • Capital plan execution driving ~7% long-term rate base growth
  • WRCP/ wildfire recovery processes enabling reimbursement cash flows via the Wildfire Fund administrator and prefunding mechanism

Business Development

  • Completed Woolsey Fire cost recovery securitization generating ~ $2 billion proceeds (proceeds used for claims/costs and retiring related debt)
  • Sold Trio to X-energy (transaction described as non-material to EIX; Trio still believed to have underlying business value)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q2 2026 core EPS: $1.04; year-to-date core EPS: $2.97 (reaffirmed confidence)
  • Reported Q2 EPS: $1.54 vs $0.97 prior year; benefited from prior-year regulatory decisions (GRC decision) and reduced interest expense associated with Woolsey cost recovery
  • Parent and other loss favorable by $0.06 driven by net financing benefits from preferred stock redemptions initiated end of 2025 and completed in Q1 2026
  • Reaffirmed 2026 core EPS guidance range: $5.90 to $6.20; reaffirmed long-term core EPS growth: 5% to 7%

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Wildfire Fund cost-recovery prefunding arrangement: crossing ~$1 billion threshold with working process to fund claims without out-of-pocket liquidity strain
  • Woolsey securitization: ~$2 billion proceeds early in the week; plan to recover claims/other costs and retire related debt to strengthen balance sheet
  • No equity need through ~2030 cited based on GRC visibility/line of sight and capital plan execution assumptions

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • SCE RAMP application filed in May for next GRC risk assessment/mitigation (wildfire transmission/distribution reliability, cybersecurity, climate adaptation)
  • Enhanced wildfire risk model: combines multiple data sources; accounts for high-impact events not reflected in historical data; evaluates combined failure scenarios beyond single equipment incidents
  • Execution progress since Jan 2025: ~800 miles covered conductor and ~90 miles undergrounding; no covered-conductor failure associated with mitigations designed to prevent those events
  • Operational excellence initiatives: automate initial design generation and validate final designs vs standards (planning orgs: ~100,000 project designs/year; target 20%–30% faster design cycles); streamline ~40,000 annual permits (target ~20% cycle-time reduction)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Assumed legislative decision timing: management indicated implications review begins after August 31; start working on near-term actions whether August 31 / September 1 (or later that night)
  • SCE GRC line of sight through 2028; future investments evaluated via disciplined benefit-cost lens contingent on legislative durability/financeability

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Legislative uncertainty in California wildfire reform/affordability framework could increase financing costs if predictability is insufficient, raising equity cost of capital and making investments more expensive
  • Rating/downgrade risk framing: absence of a credit-supportive framework in the next ~4 weeks could drive credit rating downgrades for California investor-owned utilities; next step after BBB- for the utility would be non-investment grade
  • Eaton wildfire liability disclosure refinement: equipment described as “likely associated” (management said this is streamlined language with no new viable alternatives; still based on information available)
  • Wildfire recovery estimation constraints: limited WRCP claims volume and subrogation settlements; insufficient volume to estimate low end of GAAP estimable liability range

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Legislative financeability scenarios and timing: Management said SCE has approved GRC visibility through 2028 and no equity needs through ~2030 if capital plan executes. They cannot predict Sacramento outcomes, but will reassess implications after August 31 when language is known and consider near-term actions if market cost-of-equity shifts materially.
  • WRCP reimbursement mechanics and $1B threshold: Management stated between subrogation settlements and WRCP settlements, Edison/SCE is crossing the ~$1 billion threshold. They referenced a prefunding mechanism with the Wildfire Fund administrator (CEA) so claims funding does not require coming out of pocket, and they are working through the process to fund claims now.
  • Affordability framing and credit downgrade risk: Management argued affordability is broader and not primarily energy-price driven for average SCE customers; housing costs dominate. They emphasized urgency: without a credit-supportive legislative framework in ~4 weeks, there is a strong likelihood of investor-owned utility credit rating downgrades, increasing cost of debt passed to customers; utility rating cited as BBB-.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the EIX Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Edison International (EIX) Financial Profile