Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Market Cap

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of $500.4M.

Price: $1.58

▼ -0.07 (-4.23%)

Market Cap: 500.44M

NASDAQ ¡ time unavailable

CEO: Wayne Gilbert West

Sector: Industrials

Industry: Rental & Leasing Services

IPO Date: 2021-07-01

Website: https://www.hertz.com

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) - Company Information

Market Cap: 500.44M|Sector: Industrials

Company Profile

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. operates as a leading player in the global vehicle rental industry. Its business is structured into two primary divisions: the Americas Rental Car segment and the International Rental Car segment. The company delivers its range of car rental services through a vast network of wholly-owned, licensed, and franchised locations worldwide. These services are offered under well-known brand names including Hertz, Dollar, and Thrifty, reaching customers across the United States, Canada, Latin America, the Caribbean, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Beyond its core rental offerings, Hertz also engages in vehicle sales and manages both the Firefly car rental brand and the Hertz 24/7 car-sharing service within international markets. Established in 1918, Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. is headquartered in Estero, Florida.

Analyst Sentiment

45%
Hold

From 9 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $3.43

▲ +116.4% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$1

Median

$4

High Bound

$6

Average

$3

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$3.43
▲ +116.40% Upside
Low Target
$1.00
-37% Risk
Median Target
$3.50
121% Mid
High Target
$5.50
247% Max
Consensus
Hold
7 / 21 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)5001,4481,5932,1152,1101,2101,1241,0131,105
Enterprise Value ($M)19,76320,71119,6238,96120,72219,48118,94019,48920,014
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-0.78-1.09-2.072.88-1.80-0.68-0.59-0.19-0.32
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)———0.21-0.09——-0.02-0.02
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.060.720.790.850.970.670.550.390.47
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)-0.63-1.84-3.47-6.67-4.19-4.627.341.490.56
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-0.06-0.40-0.723.38-0.77-0.461.512.56-0.34
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)—10.339.683.629.4810.749.287.578.51
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)7.4538.6435.818.8537.3449.1937.88-61.2921.61
Debt to Equity Ratio7.26-26.06-41.82-25.05-39.17-72.13120.3127.879.95

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HERTZ GLOBAL HLDGS INC (HTZ) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Hertz is a global vehicle rental and mobility services provider. The value chain starts with sourcing vehicles (new purchases or used acquisitions), deploying them into rental locations, and monetizing them through short-term rentals to consumers and longer-term rentals to business customers. Vehicles periodically exit the fleet, where the company realizes value through resale (and related remarketing channels) and recovers residual economics. Ancillary offerings—such as damage waivers, insurance-related products, and fees connected to rentals—augment the core rental transaction.

Customer stickiness is driven by a combination of (1) operational convenience (availability and turnaround logistics across locations), (2) account-level contracting for business travelers and fleet managers, and (3) loyalty programs that reduce friction for repeat renters. However, the business is inherently transactional and demand-cyclical; durability of earnings depends more on fleet economics and cost discipline than on contract permanence.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

1) Rental revenue (primary): Revenue is generated per day/week basis from vehicle rentals. Utilization and pricing drive top-line, while vehicle-related costs (depreciation, maintenance, insurance, and fleet remarketing) largely determine gross margin.

2) Ancillary revenue (margin amplifier): Damage waivers, insurance-related products, and other service fees typically carry attractive economics relative to core vehicle rental. This stream can buffer variability in base rental pricing.

3) Vehicle sales / remarketing: Residual value realization from end-of-fleet vehicles is a key monetisation component. Effective remarketing reduces net fleet cost and supports profitability through the cycle.

Margin drivers: Fleet utilization and pricing discipline (operating performance) plus residual value management (asset economics) and cost of funding (balance sheet and liquidity) are the dominant margin levers.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Hertz competes in a fragmented, highly operational industry where scale and asset/operational execution matter. The most relevant “moat” is not software-like switching costs, but rather economics around fleet ownership and redeployment.

  • Residual value and fleet cost management (economic barrier): Competitors face structural difficulty matching outcomes in remarketing channels, vehicle procurement timing, refurbishment practices, and the ability to manage fleet turnover across demand cycles. This creates a durable advantage when execution is consistent.
  • Scale in fleet procurement and deployment (cost advantage): Larger fleets can improve purchasing terms, standardize maintenance processes, and optimize inventory availability—improving utilization and reducing unit costs.
  • Operational execution & location network (practical switching costs): For corporate accounts and repeat travelers, availability at preferred geographies reduces friction and increases the practical cost of switching providers.

Competitive benchmarking (industry peers):

  • Enterprise Holdings (privately held): Strong emphasis on operational scale and distribution. Hertz competes with similar fundamentals, but Enterprise’s direct model and fleet strategy can compress pricing in shared markets.
  • Avis Budget Group (CAR): Large incumbent with global presence. Hertz competes on fleet economics and service mix; both rely heavily on remarketing execution.
  • Sixt (and other international operators): More pronounced regional differentiation. Hertz’s positioning focuses on broad geographic coverage and fleet redeployment, while some peers emphasize premium vehicle segments.

Industry focus contrast: Hertz is positioned as a global, high-volume rental operator where competitive differentiation is expressed through fleet economics (acquisition-to-remarketing discipline) and network execution rather than through unique vehicle brands or exclusive intellectual property.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Travel and mobility demand growth with international penetration: Long-horizon expansion is tied to global travel volumes, corporate travel activity, and increased travel access in emerging markets, which expand the addressable rental geography.
  • Share capture through corporate contracting and loyalty ecosystems: Even in a transactional category, better account win rates and repeat customer engagement can lift utilization and stabilize cash flows.
  • Electrification of fleets (medium-term TAM and differentiation): Adoption of EVs and hybrid fleets changes procurement and residual value dynamics. Operators with stronger forecasting, charging ecosystem partnerships, and maintenance/refurbishment capabilities can navigate this transition more effectively.
  • Data-driven pricing and inventory optimization: Ongoing improvements in yield management and vehicle matching across locations can expand effective pricing and reduce idle inventory, supporting throughput per vehicle.
  • Ancillary attachment expansion: Continued take-rate improvement for insurance/damage-waiver products and services can raise effective revenue per rental day without proportional increases in vehicle costs.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the durable growth narrative is less about linear unit growth and more about sustaining high fleet utilization, disciplined vehicle purchasing, and resilient residual economics through varying demand conditions.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Residual value volatility: Remarketing prices and used-vehicle supply/demand can shift, impacting net fleet cost and earnings stability.
  • Demand cyclicality and pricing pressure: Rental demand is sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, travel patterns, and competitive pricing behavior.
  • Vehicle supply constraints and procurement timing: Inventory availability, manufacturer incentives, and pricing for new vehicles can affect fleet cost structure and utilization.
  • Financing and liquidity risk (capital intensity): Fleet purchases require ongoing capital. Higher funding costs or reduced market access can constrain fleet strategy and margin.
  • Operational risk: Maintenance quality, accident rates, and claims management influence both direct costs and ancillary revenue economics.
  • Regulatory and environmental transition: Emissions policies, data/privacy rules for customer identification/loyalty, and safety standards can increase compliance costs and alter fleet composition economics.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value vehicle rental businesses using earnings and cash-flow multiples (e.g., EV/EBITDA) and asset-aware frameworks (often with an emphasis on net debt, fleet economics, and liquidity). Key drivers that move valuation include:

  • Fleet utilization and yield: Higher utilization and disciplined pricing expand revenue per vehicle while managing idle risk.
  • Net fleet cost and residual realization: The market focuses on whether vehicle acquisition-to-remarketing economics are improving or deteriorating.
  • Margin mix from ancillary products: Attachment rates and claims discipline affect profitability durability.
  • Balance sheet and funding profile: Cost of capital and liquidity directly influence the ability to maintain fleet levels through cycles.

Because this industry is asset-intensive and cyclical, valuation dispersion often reflects confidence in residual value management and operational execution rather than long-term growth assumptions.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Hertz’s long-term investment case centers on operational execution in fleet economics—procurement discipline, utilization management, ancillary attachment, and residual value realization. The competitive advantage is economic rather than intangible: sustained ability to turn fleet ownership into predictable net returns through remarketing and disciplined cost structure. Upside follows from improving fleet throughput and ancillary mix; downside risk concentrates in residual volatility, funding conditions, and demand-driven pricing pressure.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HTZ.

prnewswire.com•2026-08-01

HTZ Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit

NEW YORK, Aug. 1, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

globenewswire.com•2026-08-01

Shareholders who lost money in shares of Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) should contact Wolf Haldenstein Immediately

NEW YORK, Aug. 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, informs investors that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) (“Hertz” or the “Company”), on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Hertz common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive. PLEASE CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE AND SUBMIT CONTACT INFORMATION Investors who purchased Hertz shares during the class period and suffered losses may be eligible to participate in the case, with the lead-plaintiff deadline set for September 22, 2026.

gurufocus.com•2026-08-01

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit PR Newswire

prnewswire.com•2026-08-01

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit

Did you buy HTZ common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026? Affected HTZ Investor Summary Who: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) What: Securities fraud class action lawsuit filed Class Period: May 7, 2026 through June 23, 2026 Deadline to Seek Lead Plaintiff Status: September 22, 2026 Key Lawsuit Allegations: Material misstatements and/or omissions concerning the company's liquidity and financing.

globenewswire.com•2026-07-31

ROSEN, TRUSTED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - HTZ

NEW YORK, July 31, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 22, 2026.

newsfilecorp.com•2026-07-31

ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - HTZ

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 31, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

prnewswire.com•2026-07-31

Shareholders who lost money in shares of Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) should contact Wolf Haldenstein Immediately

Lead Plaintiff Deadline September 22, 2026 NEW YORK, July 31, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, informs investors that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) ("Hertz" or the "Company"), on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Hertz common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive.  PLEASE CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE AND SUBMIT CONTACT INFORMATION Investors who purchased Hertz shares during the class period and suffered losses may be eligible to participate in the case, with the lead-plaintiff deadline set for September 22, 2026.

newsfilecorp.com•2026-07-31

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 31, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) and certain of its officers. This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Hertz securities between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period").

globenewswire.com•2026-07-31

HTZ Deadline Alert: The Gross Law Firm Reminds Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (HTZ) Investors of Securities Class Action Deadline on September 22, 2026

NEW YORK, July 31, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Hertz Global Holding, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ).

globenewswire.com•2026-07-31

NASDAQ: HTZ: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Announces the Filing of a Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

Did you buy HTZ common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026? Affected HTZ Investor Summary Who: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) What: Securities fraud class action lawsuit filed Class Period: May 7, 2026 through June 23, 2026 Deadline to Seek Lead Plaintiff Status: September 22, 2026 Key Lawsuit Allegations: Material misstatements and/or omissions concerning the company's liquidity and financing.

globenewswire.com•2026-07-31

NASDAQ: HTZ: Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Announces the Filing of a Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit Against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

Did you buy HTZ common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026 ? Affected HTZ Investor Summary Who: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) What: Securities fraud class action lawsuit filed Class Period: May 7, 2026 through June 23, 2026 Deadline to Seek Lead Plaintiff Status: September 22, 2026 Key Lawsuit Allegations: Material misstatements and/or omissions concerning the company's liquidity and financing.

newsfilecorp.com•2026-07-30

Kaplan Fox Urges Investors of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) with Significant Losses to Seek a Leadership Role Before September 22, 2026

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. ("Hertz" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: HTZ) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Hertz common stock between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026 (the "Class Period"). CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE If you are an investor in Hertz and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us.

newsfilecorp.com•2026-07-30

ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - HTZ

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 30, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

gurufocus.com•2026-07-30

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

Bronstein, Gewirtz and Grossman LLC Urges Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm P

prnewswire.com•2026-07-30

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

NEW YORK, July 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: HTZ) and certain of its officers. This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Hertz securities between May 7, 2026 and June 23, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period").

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"Headline (2026-03-31 / Q1): Revenue $2.004B, EPS -$1.06, net income -$333M (net margin -16.6%). On a QoQ basis (vs 2025-12-31), revenue declined -1.2% (from $2.028B to $2.004B) while net income deteriorated materially to a larger loss (from -$194M to -$333M; profit margin -9.6% to -16.6%). On a YoY basis (vs 2025-03-31), revenue increased +10.5% (from $1.813B to $2.004B) but net income losses deepened: -$333M vs -$443M (an improvement of +24.8% in losses, i.e., less negative). Profitability across the 4-quarter window is volatile: gross margin fell to 8.9% from 21.9% in Q3’25 and operating income remained negative (-$57M; -2.8% margin). Cash flow quality is pressured but shows improvement versus the prior quarter: operating cash flow was +$20M and free cash flow was +$20M, compared with Q4’25 operating cash flow +$193M and sharply negative free cash flow due to heavy investing items. Balance sheet leverage remains high: total assets rose to $23.3B, but total stockholders’ equity is negative at -$0.79B, indicating limited cushion. Total shareholder returns are strong with price momentum: +30.1% 1Y change and no dividend (0% yield). Analysts’ consensus target ($5.83) is below the current price ($7.43), implying a cautious valuation setup despite momentum."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ revenue -1.2% (2.028B to 2.004B). YoY revenue +10.5% (1.813B to 2.004B), indicating growth despite near-term softness.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income is negative in the latest quarter (-$333M) with net margin -16.6%. QoQ losses widened (vs -$194M). Over the year, profitability has been extremely volatile (positive in Q3’25, negative in other quarters).

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Q1’26 operating cash flow was +$20M and free cash flow +$20M, a sharp deceleration vs Q4’25 OCF (+$193M). Net income remains loss-making; limited visibility into sustainable FCF.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total stockholders’ equity is negative at -$786M (Q1’26) with high debt (total debt $18.2B) and negative net worth characteristics. Cushion remains weak even though cash is higher at $1.22B.

Shareholder Returns

Good

Strong price performance: +30.1% over 1Y. Dividend yield is 0% and buyback data not indicated here, so returns appear driven primarily by capital appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Consensus target ($5.83) is below current price ($7.43), suggesting limited upside from valuation models despite positive momentum. High volatility and weak profitability constrain sentiment.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Hertz delivered a materially stronger quarter driven by pricing discipline and improved commercial execution: Q1 revenue rose 11% to $2.0B, RPD increased ~5% YoY, and adjusted EBITDA improved by $141M YoY, with EBITDA margin up 860 bps to -8%. The offsetting drag was operational disruption from recalls, up nearly 300% YoY, sidelining ~16,000 vehicles/month and reducing utilization by roughly 200 bps, while lowering transaction days and revenue (about $50M revenue impact; >$25M adjusted EBITDA impact). Despite the recall shock, management highlighted North Star momentum—tracking DPU and positioning to hit full-year RPU targets—supported by a new fleet planning engine using Navidea and Palantir. CFO guidance tempered capacity growth: days and fleet growth are reduced versus original expectations due to recalls and liquidity constraints, while EBITDA margin guidance stays 3%–6%. The platform story is front-and-center through Oro, expanding Uber-based rideshare fleet services and later autonomous operations coordination for Lucid vehicles.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Advanced fleet planning engine leveraging Navidea decision optimization and Palantir Foundry to improve “right car/right place/right time” outcomes
  • Commercial pricing and monetization playbook: RPD up ~5% YoY; transaction days up ~3% YoY
  • Higher-margin durable demand: direct website growth, strengthening partnership segment, and rideshare rental growth
  • Ongoing fleet economics benefits: improved residual values after slow start; disciplined fleet rotation with youngest fleet in nearly a decade
  • Easter performance demonstrating engine consistency: utilization highest since 2017; RPD +10% YoY; RPU on rentable fleet +16% YoY with ~20,000 fewer rental vehicles

Business Development

  • Navidea (decision optimization engine) and Palantir (Foundry data OS) for fleet planning engine
  • Amazon Autos partnership to drive top-of-funnel car sales leads and scale the omnichannel model
  • New eBay partnership to put near-new certified inventory in front of more customers
  • Cox Automotive and Autotrader partnerships: AI-generated pricing, revamped digital tools, and upstream lead generation
  • American Express Gold Card: new Hertz iStar status benefit launched (partnership segment expansion)
  • Air Canada Aeroplan: new strategic partnership launched (yesterday per transcript)
  • Uber partnership expanded via Oro; Oro active on Uber platform in Atlanta, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Northern New Jersey launched this week
  • Oro joined Uber’s autonomous robo taxi program supporting Lucid vehicles with neuro AV technology; starting later this year Oro provides orchestration/operations (charging, maintenance, repairs, cleaning, depot staffing)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $2.0B, +11% YoY and beat consensus; strongest YoY revenue growth in 3 years
  • Adjusted EBITDA: -$161M, +$141M YoY improvement; EBITDA margin improved +860 bps to -8% from -17%
  • GAAP EPS: -$1.06; adjusted EPS: -$0.72 (adjusted EPS improvement of +$0.35 YoY)
  • RPD: up ~5% YoY (also referenced as ~5.5% in CFO detail); transaction days up ~3% YoY
  • Recalls headwind: recalls up nearly 300% YoY; removed ~16,000 vehicles/month on average
  • Utilization impact: ~200 bps reduction YoY attributable to recalls; utilization also described as ~140 bps higher for same period after partial offsets (and reported utilization 90 bps above Q1 ’23/’24)
  • Recall-related impacts: transaction days impacted by ~$930,000; revenue impact ~$50M; total impact to adjusted EBITDA more than $25M
  • DOE per transaction day: $38.43 (+1.7% YoY); DOE per day impacted by variable costs and real estate tied to sale-leaseback; normalized DOE per day improved ~1.6% YoY
  • Profitability spread: RPD to DOE per day improved ~12% YoY
  • DOE per day guidance mechanics: full-year DOE per day expected roughly flat YoY despite “pressure on revenue and related expenses”

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Ending liquidity: $837M (cash + revolver capacity)
  • ABS financing completed in April: +$200M liquidity added in Q2
  • Liquidity outlook: expect end of Q2 just under $1B; expect end of year >$1.5B
  • No buyback amount or net debt level explicitly provided in transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Fleet transformation North Star metrics: DPU < $300 (month), RPU > $1,500, DOE per day low $30s; targeting $1B EBITDA in 2027
  • DPU: gross DPU beat the metric; net DPU in line with expectations; full-year net DPU expected to remain below $300 even with enriched fleet mix
  • Recall mitigation efforts: working proactively upstream with OEMs and government officials for tactical and structural improvements
  • Automation/optimization: advanced fleet planning engine using Navidea + Palantir
  • Capacity management: decided to limit capacity growth in first half; reevaluate later in second half due to liquidity drains and June revolver size reduction
  • Seasonal/trough investment: SG&A as % of revenue improved from 12% to 11.6% despite higher advertising spend

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q2 guidance: days down 2–3 percentage points YoY; fleet down ~1–2 percentage points YoY (recalls weigh on days)
  • Q2 RPD: year-over-year improvement expected higher than Q1 due to strong April RPD
  • Q2 net DPU: well below $300/month (sizable gains on sale of vehicles expected in the quarter)
  • Full-year guidance: days likely up mid-single-digit range vs earlier mid- to high-single-digit; fleet up low single digits vs earlier mid-single digits
  • Full-year profitability: maintaining EBITDA margin guidance 3%–6%
  • 2027 target: still targeting $1B EBITDA for the year

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Recalls significantly disrupted operations: recalls up nearly 300% YoY; ~16,000 vehicles/month sidelined; reduced utilization by ~200 bps and pressured transaction days
  • Government shutdown, elevated TSA wait times, and storm disruptions in key markets
  • Industry supply constraints contributed to RPD strength, but management cautioned about the pricing-supply-unit cost tradeoff and ongoing profitability/return on invested capital tension
  • Liquidity/financing constraints: abnormal liquidity drains included Wells Fargo litigation settlement; revolver size reduction in June
  • Fixed-cost footprint pressure: facilities costs “sticker cost” given lease terms and current fleet size

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Valuation framework vs Oro/platform transformation: Management said equity valuation remains “almost entirely based” on traditional rental-car economics, making it hard to assign new multiples. They described shifting to sum-of-the-parts where Oro and fleet could deserve separate stand-alone valuation evidence over time.
  • DOE per day path and whether cost targets can miss low-$30s: Management emphasized the critical spread between RPD and DOE per day. They argued longer-tail cost efficiency improvements plus scale leverage could still drive sub-35 DOE per day with only 10%–15% more scale, even if RPU/RPD must rise.
  • Core RPU durability vs macro/operational shocks and booking window confidence: Analyst asked for breakdown of shutdown/storm/recall impacts and how confident management is in maintaining positive growth with guidance pulling fleet to low single digits. Response begins by focusing on RPD/RPU inflection, but transcript cuts before specifics.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HTZ Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HTZ.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HTZ)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ) Financial Profile