Huntsman Corporation

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Market Cap

Huntsman Corporation has a market capitalization of $1.71B.

Price: $9.76

β–Ό -2.31 (-19.14%)

Market Cap: 1.71B

NYSE Β· time unavailable

CEO: Peter R. Huntsman

Sector: Basic Materials

Industry: Chemicals

IPO Date: 2005-02-14

Website: https://www.huntsman.com

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.71B|Sector: Basic Materials

Company Profile

Huntsman Corporation operates as a global producer and marketer of specialized organic chemical compounds. Its operations are structured across four distinct business divisions: Polyurethanes, Performance Products, Advanced Materials, and Textile Effects. The Polyurethanes division supplies a range of polyurethane-based chemicals, such as methyl diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), polyols, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), propylene oxide, and methyl tertiary-butyl ether. Within Performance Products, the company produces a variety of amines and maleic anhydrides, alongside other key chemicals like ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, glycols, ethylene dichloride, caustic soda, ammonia, hydrogen, methylamines, and acrylonitrile. The Advanced Materials segment focuses on advanced polymer solutions. This includes formulations based on epoxy, acrylic, polyurethane, and acrylonitrile-butadiene, as well as high-performance thermoset resins, curing and toughening agents, carbon nanotube additives, and fundamental liquid and solid resins. Finally, the Textile Effects division delivers specialized chemicals and dyes for the textile industry. Huntsman's diverse product portfolio finds extensive application across numerous industries. These span from adhesives, aerospace components, and automotive manufacturing to various construction materials, consumer goods (both durable and non-durable), electronics, insulation, and medical devices. Additionally, their chemicals are vital in packaging, coatings, power generation, refining, synthetic fibers, and the textile and dye sectors. Established in 1970, Huntsman Corporation maintains its corporate headquarters in The Woodlands, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

56%
Buy

From 13 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $14.20

β–² +45.5% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$12

Median

$15

High Bound

$16

Average

$14

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$14.20
β–² +45.49% Upside
Low Target
$12.00
23% Risk
Median Target
$15.00
54% Mid
High Target
$16.00
64% Max
Consensus
Hold
14 / 33 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

πŸ“Š Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 30, 2026Mar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)1,7121,8372,3031,7301,5501,7982,7223,1034,165
Enterprise Value ($M)3,4533,5784,4214,0353,4833,8354,7435,0006,113
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-9.81-76.51-10.73-4.90-16.04-2.83-170.15-5.50-50.42
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)β€”-4.47-2.24β€”-116.90-0.83β€”β€”β€”
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.291.101.621.281.061.231.932.142.70
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.630.680.860.630.560.640.921.051.34
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)-190.20-20.41-25.3091.0510.1333.31-24.7530.4247.33
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)β€”2.153.112.982.392.633.363.443.97
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)12.2932.2468.01212.3740.50-83.3841.25384.6148.90
Debt to Equity Ratio6.200.780.930.990.870.860.800.760.73

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ HUNTSMAN CORP (HUN) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Huntsman is a global specialty chemicals manufacturer focused on value-added intermediates and formulated systems for end markets such as coatings, construction, appliances, transportation, and industrial applications. The business operates across a chemical value chain that links (1) feedstock processing into key intermediates, (2) conversion into performance materials (notably polyurethanes and epoxy-related products), and (3) application-oriented support to help customers meet performance, safety, and regulatory requirements.

Revenue is generated when Huntsman sells differentiated products and systems into customer specifications, with ongoing demand supported by product qualification processes, engineering collaboration, and long qualification timelines typical in performance polymers and coatings.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Monetisation is primarily product-driven with limited direct β€œsubscription” economics. The mix is best understood as:

  • Polyurethane and epoxy-related product sales that monetize through differentiation in performance properties (flexibility, durability, chemical resistance, thermal behavior) rather than pure commodity pricing.
  • Systems and application support where Huntsman participates earlier in customer formulations, supporting higher realized margins versus basic intermediates.

Margin drivers typically include (1) product mix toward higher-value formulations, (2) manufacturing efficiency and reliability of specialty assets, and (3) the ability to manage feedstock-cost volatility through pricing actions and contractual or customer-specific value positioning.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Huntsman’s moat is best characterized as a combination of Switching Costs, Integrated Cost Advantage, and Technical/Qualification Barriers rather than a single structural network effect.

  • Switching Costs / Qualification Barriers: Specialty polymer and coatings supply chains require extensive testing, certification, and process tuning. Once a formulation is qualified, changing suppliers can disrupt performance targets and application lines, creating meaningful customer stickiness.
  • Process and Manufacturing Integration: Scale and operational know-how in chemical manufacturing supports competitive cost positions and supply reliabilityβ€”important for customers that prioritize continuity and spec compliance.
  • Technical Service and System-Level Collaboration: Customers value formulation support and performance verification, raising the effective β€œeffort cost” of replacement even when a nominal price advantage exists.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Covestro and BASF (broad, global chemical platforms) compete for polyurethane and broader performance material demand. Their scale can pressure pricing in more standardized product categories.
  • Dow competes across performance polymers and intermediates, often leveraging broad manufacturing footprints and customer relationships.
  • Wanhua is a notable competitor in polyurethane-focused materials, often strong in capacity and scale.

Compared with these rivals, Huntsman tends to emphasize application-oriented performance positioning and customer qualification dynamics, where specifications and system-level performance matter more than commodity-like pricing.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is supported by end-market demand for performance materials and the need for efficient, durable, and regulated-compliant products:

  • Construction and infrastructure performance: Demand for durable coatings, sealants, insulation-related materials, and protective finishes supports continued utilization of polyurethane and epoxy systems.
  • Transportation efficiency and lightweighting: Automotive and industrial applications increasingly require materials that enable weight reduction and longevity under thermal and chemical stress.
  • Energy transition and industrial modernization: Wind, solar, grid infrastructure, and industrial maintenance cycles support protective coatings and adhesives used in harsh environments.
  • Regulatory-driven formulation upgrades: Stricter environmental, safety, and performance standards drive requalification toward higher-performance chemistries where incumbents with technical support can defend share.

TAM expansion is primarily achieved through product mix shifts toward higher-value specialty grades and systems, supported by customer qualification and service, rather than pure volume growth in commodity niches.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclicality and margin compression: Specialty chemical earnings depend on spreads between selling prices and feedstock/energy inputs, as well as end-market industrial cycle strength.
  • Feedstock and energy volatility: Feedstock cost movements can pressure margins when price pass-through lags.
  • Capital intensity and maintenance cycles: Manufacturing reliability and environmental compliance require ongoing investment; cost overruns can affect normalized returns.
  • Regulatory and environmental compliance risk: Emissions, waste treatment, and evolving chemical regulations can increase operating costs and restrict processes or product lines.
  • Competitive capacity additions: Capacity expansions by large global peers can pressure pricing, particularly in more standardized grades.
  • Customer concentration and specification shifts: If customers change systems for cost or regulatory reasons, qualification timelines may not fully protect against long-cycle demand swings.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

The market typically values specialty chemical businesses using EV/EBITDA and earnings power frameworks that focus on normalized margins, return on capital, and sustainable cash generation through the cycle. Key valuation sensitivities often include:

  • Normalized spread vs. feedstock costs (earnings durability across the chemical cycle).
  • Product mix and mix resilience (ability to maintain specialty-grade realizations).
  • Capital discipline (maintenance capex needs and any value-accretive investment programs).
  • Working capital dynamics tied to inventory and receivables, which influence free cash flow.

Because earnings can be cyclical, valuation discipline typically requires assessing whether the business can sustain margins through varying input and demand conditions, supported by specification-driven demand and manufacturing reliability.

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

Huntsman offers an institutional specialty-chemicals thesis anchored in customer qualification and switching costs, operational integration, and technical application support that help defend share against larger diversified competitors. The long-term opportunity is driven by performance-material demand in construction, transportation, and industrial applications, where regulatory and durability requirements favor suppliers with proven formulations and reliable specialty manufacturing.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

πŸ“° Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HUN.

marketbeat.comβ€’2026-07-31

Huntsman Q2 Earnings Call Highlights

Huntsman NYSE: HUN said it expects relatively stable conditions in the third quarter after improving margins in the second quarter, while management cited subdued demand growth, weaker North American housing indicators and uneven consumer confidence across major regions.

seekingalpha.comβ€’2026-07-31

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.comβ€’2026-07-30

Compared to Estimates, Huntsman (HUN) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

While the top- and bottom-line numbers for Huntsman (HUN) give a sense of how the business performed in the quarter ended June 2026, it could be worth looking at how some of its key metrics compare to Wall Street estimates and year-ago values.

zacks.comβ€’2026-07-30

Huntsman (HUN) Reports Break-Even Earnings for Q2

Huntsman (HUN) reported break-even quarterly earnings per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.06. This compares to a loss of $0.2 per share a year ago.

prnewswire.comβ€’2026-07-30

Huntsman Announces Third Quarter 2026 Common Dividend

THE WOODLANDS, Texas, July 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) announced today that its Board of Directors has declared a $0.0875 per share cash dividend on its common stock. The dividend is payable on September 30, 2026, to stockholders of record as of September 15, 2026.

prnewswire.comβ€’2026-07-30

Huntsman Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings

Second Quarter Highlights Second quarter 2026 net loss attributable to Huntsman of $6 million compared to a net loss of $158 million in the prior year period; second quarter 2026 diluted loss per share of $0.03 compared to diluted loss per share of $0.92 in the prior year period. Second quarter 2026 adjusted net income attributable to Huntsman of nil compared to adjusted net loss of $34 million in the prior year period; second quarter 2026 adjusted diluted income per share of nil compared to adjusted diluted loss per share of $0.20 in the prior year period.

zacks.comβ€’2026-07-23

Huntsman (HUN) Reports Next Week: Wall Street Expects Earnings Growth

Huntsman (HUN) possesses the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.

prnewswire.comβ€’2026-07-14

OLIN and HUNTSMAN Announce S-4 Registration Statement in Connection with Planned Merger is Effective

Special Meetings of Olin Shareholders and Huntsman Stockholders Scheduled for August 25,Β 2026 CLAYTON, Missouri and THE WOODLANDS, Texas, July 14, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Olin Corporation (NYSE: OLN) ("Olin") and Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) ("Huntsman") today announced that on July 13, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the registration statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") filed by Olin in connection with the previously announced all-stock merger of equals (the "Transaction") to form a combined company, OlinHuntsman. The companies have also released a supplemental FAQ which contains further details regarding the synergies expected to be achieved from the Transaction.

gurufocus.comβ€’2026-07-10

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Launches Legal Inquiry for the Merger--PULM, SLP, OLN, and HUN

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The M&A Class Action Firm Launches Legal Inquiry for the Merger--PULM, SLP, OLN, and HUN PR Newswire

247wallst.comβ€’2026-07-10

5 Dividend Stocks Flashing Warning Signs

A fat dividend yield can be the last thing a struggling company offers before it disappears entirely. These five income stocks are paying out more than their earnings and cash flow can support, and some have already cut once without fixing the underlying problem.

prnewswire.comβ€’2026-07-06

Are ESI, INM, HUN, OLN Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

/PRNewswire/ -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws

globenewswire.comβ€’2026-07-02

Shareholder Alert: Ademi LLP investigates whether Huntsman Corporation is obtaining a Fair Price for Public Shareholders

MILWAUKEE, July 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Ademi LLP is investigating Huntsman (NYSE: HUN) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of law in its recently announced transaction with Olin.

prnewswire.comβ€’2026-06-30

Huntsman to Discuss Second Quarter 2026 Results on July 31, 2026

THE WOODLANDS, Texas, June 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) will hold a conference call on Friday, July 31, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. ET to discuss its second quarter 2026 financial results.

gurufocus.comβ€’2026-06-25

Are ROKU, HUN, OLN Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders?

Are ROKU, HUN, OLN Obtaining Fair Deals for their Shareholders? PR Newswire NEW YORK, June 25, 2026

benzinga.comβ€’2026-06-24

Top 3 Materials Stocks That Are Set To Fly This Month

The most oversold stocks in the materials sector presents an opportunity to buy into undervalued companies.

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-30

"HUN delivered a clear rebound in 2026-06-30 (Q2): Revenue was $1.663B, up +17.2% QoQ ($1.420B in Q1) and +14.1% YoY ($1.459B in Q2’25). Net Income turned positive to $43.0M from a net loss of $(53.0)M in Q1, and improved from $(159.0)M in Q2’25. EPS is not directly comparable due to a likely data anomaly (shown as -0.03 with diluted share count listed), but the profitability trend is unambiguously favorable. Margins expanded meaningfully across the quarter: gross margin rose to 14.7% (from 12.9% in Q1), and net margin swung to +2.6% from -3.7% in Q1. YoY margins also improved versus Q2’25 (net margin -10.9%). Cash flow quality remains mixed. Operating cash flow was -$60M in Q2, despite positive net income, while free cash flow was -$90Mβ€”suggesting working-capital and/or non-cash items weighed on cash conversion. Balance-sheet resilience looks stable on an absolute basis: total assets were $7.19B, and equity remained strong at $6.95B. Leverage is elevated with total debt of $2.09B, but liquidity (cash $346M) is intact. Shareholder returns are positive but not momentum-strong: the stock is up only +3.89% over 1 year, with a modest dividend yield (~0.9%). Analyst targets (~$13.75 consensus vs $13.35 price) imply limited upside, keeping the valuation score in the mid-range."

Revenue Growth

Good

Revenue increased +17.2% QoQ (to $1.663B) and +14.1% YoY (from $1.458B). Trend is upward across the last two sequential quarters provided.

Profitability

Positive

Net income swung to +$43.0M in Q2 from -$53.0M in Q1 and improved vs -$159.0M YoY. Net margin improved to +2.6% from -3.7% QoQ and from -10.9% YoY; gross margin also expanded.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Despite positive net income, operating cash flow was -$60M and free cash flow was -$90M in Q2. Cash conversion appears weak versus earlier quarters.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total assets were stable ($7.19B) and equity is very high at $6.95B. However, debt remains substantial ($2.09B) and net debt is ~$1.74B, so balance-sheet risk is moderate.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total return signals are positive but not strong: 1y price change is +3.89% (no >20% momentum boost). Dividend yield is low (~0.9%). Buybacks occurred (common stock repurchased ~$19M) but overall shareholder yield appears limited.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target (~$13.75) is only slightly above the $13.35 price, suggesting near-to-moderate upside. Price momentum is modest, tempering sentiment/valuation.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Huntsman’s Q1 2026 call centers on pricing discipline and stronger-than-expected demand into Q2, especially supported by low inventory and heightened operating constraints in MDI. Management claims Polyurethanes pricing is staying ahead of benzene (benzene cited at $4.71) and expects Q2 pricing to offset well in excess of ~$100m of raw material costs absorbed in the quarter, implying margin improvement. However, sustainability is the central uncertainty: management repeatedly flagged demand as the largest variable for the second half, with inflation and Europe lethargy risks, plus less clear visibility beyond June. In MDI, industry utilization is described as moving toward the upper-80s/high-80s near ~90% globally, with specific pressure on Europe from gas cost differentials. Performance Products faces logistics-driven volatility from a Saudi ethylenamine asset constrained by Strait of Hormuz routing, with Q2 EBITDA impact ranging $30m–$40m due to truck economics and ~50% operating rates.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Advanced Materials recovery traction driven by aerospace and power end-markets; management expects results and momentum to be largely in line with what was expected a quarter ago
  • MDI supply tightness improving pricing power: industry moving into upper-80%/~90% utilization with multiple outages/disruptions absorbed by producers
  • Polyurethanes pricing initiatives staying ahead of benzene costs and offsetting large raw material cost absorption

Business Development

  • Composite Wood Products (CWP) and Technical Insulation demand strength in Europe (data center/warehouse/prefabricated building-related applications)
  • ACE (adhesives, coatings, elastomers) improvement in Europe tied to green-shoot demand (no named customer provided)
  • Saudi Arabia ethylenamine/joint-venture facility impacted by Gulf geography/logistics; operations ongoing albeit ~50% with truck-outs

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Polyurethanes: Q2 projected to absorb well in excess of ~$100m raw material costs in the quarter while expecting to offset via higher prices
  • Ethyl enamine joint venture (Performance Products): guidance step-up from $26m EBITDA to $30m–$40m EBITDA impact range in Q2, driven by facility down time, ~50% operating rate, and truck logistics (variability depends on economic routing success)
  • MDI pricing: management indicated North America all-product price trends have shown no quarter-on-quarter growth since 2022, but a quarterly jump is now visible into Q2; Europe also improving but with some strength attributed to Advanced Materials rather than macro
  • Mid-cycle reference for Polyurethanes: mid-teens EBITDA-on-average business target (no explicit bps deltas provided in transcript)
  • Benzene benchmark cited: benzene β€œjust settled at $4.71”; management claims Polyurethanes exits Q2 staying ahead of raw materials into Q3

AI IconCapital Funding

  • No buyback amount, debt levels, or cash runway explicitly stated in the provided transcript excerpt

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Commercial priority: continue raising prices to offset rising costs; avoid being a β€œshock absorber” between raw material costs and finished product pricing
  • Operating priority: reliable plant execution to ensure product availability; management stated Q1 and early Q2 operations were β€œexcellent”
  • Pre-buy management: customers buying ahead of announced price increases concentrated around β€œtwo to three days on MDI”; management discourages excessive pull-through and shifts to longer-term contract extensions when appropriate
  • Logistics workarounds: ethylenamine material trucked out (to the Red Sea and south) due to Strait of Hormuz constraints; Freeport facilities used to offset where possible

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • MDI utilization: industry low-to-mid 80s with management implying they are now in the high 80s; global MDI utilization cited around ~90% capacity utilization (upper-80s on stated capacity basis) due to outages and demand pull-through
  • Demand sustainability caution: management expects order visibility through June but less clarity further out; biggest variable for second half demand is macro
  • Construction activity: management expects ~2%–3% low single-digit growth in construction for 2026 (Q2 into Q3 timeframe), with permits down 11% in March cited as a step preceding starts
  • Q2 raw-material absorption vs pricing: management expects prices higher than raw material costs absorbed in Q2, implying sequential margin support (with sustainability dependent on demand)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • MDI/Europe energy cost pressure: management cited European natural gas priced in mid-teens vs Houston ship channel under $2/MMBtu, implying continued petrochemical cost disadvantage in Europe
  • Competitive/structural pressure in China: differences in feedstock integration (coal vs teapot refineries vs refinery-integrated systems) could drive ongoing cost and export-related pressure
  • Sustainability of demand into Q3/Q4: management repeatedly emphasized uncertainty and β€œtoo early” to gauge third/fourth quarter order trends; risk of consumer/industrial inflation-driven demand pullback later in year
  • Polyurethanes profitability ceiling risk if demand weakens: profitability depends on demand and raw material stability; management noted European inflation factors are a concern
  • Performance Products headwind: ethylenamine facility logistics and temporary down time; potential cost/availability variability due to trucking vs shipping economics

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • MDI supply tightness and structural effects: Management described European gas cost gaps (mid-teens vs <$2/MMBtu in Houston), expected ongoing pressure on European MDI producers, and structural competitive distortions from Chinese feedstock/integration differences. They also tied ongoing effects to competition and raw-material realities beyond the immediate crisis window.
  • Polyurethanes pricing vs benzene timing and margin path: Analysts sought confirmation whether being ahead of benzene in Q2 creates a Q3 headwind as benzene catches up. Management said they expect to exit Q2 ahead of raw material costs into Q3, reinforced by benzene settling at $4.71, and that further pricing depends primarily on macro demand.
  • Ethyl enamine joint venture impact magnitude and Q2 range drivers: Management clarified the $30m–$40m Q2 step-up vs $26m prior EBITDA, attributing variability to the facility running ~50% after being down for a couple weeks and trucking material around the Red Sea/south. They cited potential $4.5m–$5m impact and emphasized economic routing success as the key swing factor.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HUN Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

πŸ“‹ Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HUN.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
πŸ“

SEC Filings (HUN)

Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” Huntsman Corporation (HUN) Financial Profile