Sanmina Corporation

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Market Cap

Sanmina Corporation has a market capitalization of $13.51B.

Price: $252.08

-28.05 (-10.01%)

Market Cap: 13.51B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Jure Sola

Sector: Technology

Industry: Hardware, Equipment & Parts

IPO Date: 1993-04-14

Website: https://www.sanmina.com

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) - Company Information

Market Cap: 13.51B|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

Sanmina Corporation provides integrated manufacturing solutions, components, products and repair, logistics, and after-market services worldwide. It operates in two businesses, Integrated Manufacturing Solutions; and Components, Products and Services. The company offers product design and engineering, including concept development, detailed design, prototyping, validation, preproduction, manufacturing design release, and product industrialization; assembly and test services; direct order fulfillment and logistics services; after-market product service and support; and supply chain management services, as well as engages in the manufacturing of components, subassemblies, and complete systems. In addition, the company provides interconnect systems, such as printed circuit board fabrication, backplane, cable assemblies, and plastic injection moldings; mechanical systems comprising enclosures and precision machining; memory, storage platforms, radio frequency, optical, and microelectronic solutions; defense and aerospace products; and cloud-based manufacturing execution software. It offers its products and services primarily to original equipment manufacturers in the industrial, medical, defense and aerospace, automotive, communications networks, and cloud solutions industries. Sanmina Corporation was founded in 1980 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Analyst Sentiment

43%
Hold

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $200.00

▼ -20.7% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$200

Median

$200

High Bound

$200

Average

$200

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$200.00
▼ -20.66% Upside
Low Target
$200.00
-21% Risk
Median Target
$200.00
-21% Mid
High Target
$200.00
-21% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

SANM Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$252.08
Intrinsic Value$135.06
Market Alignment
Overvalued by 46.4%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 3%3%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$0.11B
Perpetuity TV Value$2.00B
Discounted TV (PV)$0.84B
TV Weighting %59.2%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 SANMINA CORP (SANM) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Sanmina is an electronics manufacturing services (EMS) provider that supports customers across the product lifecycle—from early-stage engineering and prototype builds to high-volume manufacturing, logistics, and end-of-life services. The value chain typically begins with customer design intent, moves through design-for-manufacturing and systems engineering, then scales into complex manufacturing (including test, configuration, and quality systems), and ultimately extends into distribution, repairs, and warranty/after-market support.

This operating model embeds stickiness: once Sanmina has validated processes, fixtures, test programs, quality documentation, and supply-chain workflows for a specific product family, requalifying a new manufacturer becomes costly in time, engineering effort, and quality risk.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by manufacturing and systems integration work, with additional contributions from engineering services and after-market solutions. Monetisation is generally structured around:

  • Manufacturing/production services: largely transactional and volume-linked, but with margin sensitivity to mix (complex builds vs. simpler assembly), labor intensity, yield, and supply-chain execution.
  • Engineering and product lifecycle services: typically higher value than pure assembly, supporting better differentiation through NPI support, design-to-manufacture translation, and integrated testing/configuration.
  • After-market and services: more recurring in nature (repairs, returns, field service support, and ongoing logistics), which can smooth revenue volatility and improve lifecycle economics.

Key margin drivers are manufacturing complexity, service mix (engineering/test vs. commodity assembly), procurement discipline (including component sourcing and pass-through structures), and working-capital efficiency.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The durable competitive edge is best framed as a combination of switching costs, process and quality know-how, and global manufacturing scale that reduces execution risk for complex electronics programs.

  • High switching costs (program-level): requalification cycles, test development, regulatory/quality documentation, supplier certification, and engineering integration create friction for customers to move programs between EMS providers.
  • Engineering-to-manufacturing capability: customers value providers that can translate design intent into yield-optimized processes and robust testing—especially for high-mix, short-life-cycle, or feature-dense products.
  • Manufacturing network depth: geographic and operational coverage supports sourcing strategies, localization needs, and contingency planning—particularly important for customers managing risk across supply and demand cycles.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Jabil (JBL): also a large EMS player with broad end-market exposure and scale-driven cost advantages. Jabil competes heavily on manufacturing footprint and diversified programs, while Sanmina often emphasizes complexity, engineering-enabled builds, and lifecycle support tied to customer product programs.
  • Flex (FLEX): competes across electronics manufacturing with strong capabilities in integrated design and supply-chain solutions. Flex’s strength frequently aligns with large global customers and platform-style programs, whereas Sanmina’s positioning tends to be more program- and engineering-process centric in complex electronics.
  • Celestica (CLS): focuses on high-complexity manufacturing and test-centric operations for certain industries. Celestica’s competitive frame can be similar on complexity; Sanmina differentiates through broader lifecycle service scope and integrated execution across the product journey.

Sanmina’s industry emphasis is skewed toward programs where engineering content, test rigor, and lifecycle support materially affect both cost and reliability—areas where switching costs are most pronounced.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, Sanmina’s opportunity is tied to structural outsourcing and product complexity trends that expand total addressable manufacturing and lifecycle services:

  • Rising electronics content per end product: industrial automation, networking and connectivity, data infrastructure, and advanced transportation platforms increase the volume of assemblies requiring sophisticated manufacturing and validation.
  • Outsourcing of engineering and lifecycle execution: customers increasingly outsource NPI, test development, configuration, and after-market obligations to reduce execution burden and improve speed-to-market.
  • Supply-chain resilience and localization: customers value manufacturing partners that can mitigate disruption risk through operational flexibility, multi-site execution, and disciplined sourcing strategies.
  • Higher test and reliability requirements: feature density and tighter tolerances raise the value of EMS providers that can deliver yield and quality at scale.
  • After-market and service expansion: extended product lifecycles and regulatory/quality expectations can increase demand for repairs, returns management, and field support—improving lifecycle economics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclicality and utilization risk: EMS revenues and margins can fluctuate with customer production volumes; margin recovery depends on maintaining mix and operational discipline.
  • Customer concentration and program transitions: shifts in customer outsourcing strategy or timing of program ramps can pressure backlog and working capital.
  • Supply-chain volatility: component shortages, allocation dynamics, and pricing swings can compress margins if pass-through mechanisms are limited or procurement execution lags.
  • Quality and delivery execution: electronics manufacturing carries consequential warranty, scrap, and remediation costs; sustained quality performance is critical to retain programs.
  • Capital intensity and technology obsolescence: tooling, test capability, and engineering resources must keep pace with product changes; misalignment can create cost drag.
  • Geopolitical and trade restrictions: cross-border manufacturing and sourcing can face tariffs, export controls, and compliance requirements.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values EMS businesses through earnings power and cash conversion, often expressed via EV/EBITDA and/or revenue multiple frameworks that reflect cyclical earnings quality. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Operating margin stability: mix shift toward engineering/test and higher-complexity work can support margin durability.
  • Free cash flow conversion: working capital management (inventory, receivables, and payables) influences perceived earnings quality.
  • Service mix and lifecycle contribution: after-market and service content tends to reduce earnings volatility.
  • Order visibility and backlog quality: while programs can be lumpy, sustainable pipeline and customer retention matter for long-run earning capacity.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Sanmina’s long-term thesis rests on a structural advantage in complex electronics execution where switching costs are elevated and where engineering-to-manufacturing capabilities translate into durable customer program relationships. Competitive differentiation is reinforced by lifecycle services, global operational depth, and process/quality know-how—factors that can support improved mix and earnings resilience through industry cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-28

"Headline (2026-03-28, Q2): Revenue $4.01B; Net Income $93.6M; EPS $1.72. YoY growth: Revenue +96.6% (vs 2025-06-28 Q3) and Net Income +28.8% (vs 2025-06-28). QoQ growth: Revenue +25.9% (vs 2025-12-27 Q1) and Net Income +90.0%. Profitability improved: net margin rose to 2.33% from 1.55% in Q1 (and from 3.36% in Q3 last year), while operating margin increased to 3.91% from 3.69% in Q1. Cash flow quality was strong. Operating Cash Flow was $399M and Free Cash Flow $342M, both improving versus Q1 (OCF $179M; FCF $91.9M). Working capital was a modest drag (change in working capital -$20.6M), but cash generation still expanded. On capital returns, SANM paid no dividends; financing shows buybacks of $159M offset by $155M in common stock issued (net modest). Balance sheet resilience improved versus earlier quarters: total equity rose to $7.05B from $2.66B in Q1, and cash increased to $1.58B. Leverage appears manageable with net debt at $0.60B (down from $1.05B in Q1). Total shareholder returns look very strong given price momentum: 1-year change of +131.6% (well above +20%), with no dividend yield."

Revenue Growth

Strong

QoQ revenue increased +25.9% (Q2 2026 vs Q1 2026). YoY revenue rose +96.6% compared with the same prior-year quarter (2025-06-28).

Profitability

Positive

Net margin improved QoQ to 2.33% from 1.55% (Q1), and operating margin ticked up to 3.91%. Over the 4-quarter run it’s volatile, but Q2 profitability is stronger than the immediately prior quarter.

Cash Flow Quality

Good

OCF jumped to $399M and FCF to $342M in Q2, up from Q1 OCF $179M and FCF $91.9M. No dividends; buyback activity occurred while cash generation remained robust.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Total assets were $9.67B with equity up materially to $7.05B versus Q1. Net debt improved to $0.60B (from $1.05B in Q1), suggesting improving balance-sheet resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Capital appreciation is exceptional (+131.6% 1Y). Dividend yield is 0; however, buyback activity is present and momentum materially boosts total return.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target is $200 versus current price $174.09 (~+15% upside). With very strong momentum, valuation may be demanding, but the target implies additional upside.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Sanmina’s Q2 FY26 results were materially ahead of its own outlook, driven by a customer-driven pull-in of ZT Systems accelerated compute shipments into the quarter. Revenue reached ~$4.01B (up 102% YoY), with non-GAAP operating margin at 6.4% (+80 bps YoY) and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.16 (up 125% YoY). Despite margin headwinds in CPS—gross margin down 230 bps—overall profitability benefited from mix, disciplined cost control, and operating leverage. The company’s communications and cloud/AI infrastructure end markets remained strong, including advanced optical and switching/plug-in solutions, with management confirming ongoing shipments of 1.6T switches and 1.6T pluggables development for partners. ZT integration is described as transitioning from post-transaction readiness to customer continuity and next-gen growth. While management is confident in FY26 and reiterates FY27 $16B+ potential, it explicitly flags timing and mix as key uncertainties for accelerated compute demand and ZT margins.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • ZT Systems accelerated compute customer-driven pull-in: compute shipments previously expected in 2H shifted into Q2, driving ZT revenue to $1.88B
  • Core Sanmina growth across majority end markets; Core Sanmina IMS revenue up 6.0% YoY to $1.70B
  • Communication Networks & Cloud AI Infrastructure demand strength (IP switching/routing, optical systems, pluggables, broadband access, 5G) and accelerated compute/storage/general-purpose compute support

Business Development

  • Won multiple hyperscalers and ODMs for future new-generation accelerated compute platform; secured next-generation accelerated compute business with both hyperscale and OEM customers (production schedules being finalized)
  • Communications new programs: advanced switch and pluggables platforms (including 1.6 TB pluggables and 1.6 Tb switches) delivered for partner customers rather than competing with them

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q2 revenue $4.01B exceeded outlook; non-GAAP operating margin 6.4% and non-GAAP diluted EPS $3.16 both exceeded outlook
  • Revenue up 102% YoY to ~$4.0B; Core Sanmina revenue up 7.3% YoY; ZT Systems revenue $1.88B exceeded expectations
  • Non-GAAP gross profit $360M = 9.0% of revenue, down 10 bps YoY due to mix
  • Non-GAAP operating profit $257M = 6.4% margin, up 80 bps YoY (80 bps operating margin expansion)
  • IMS non-GAAP gross margin 8.5%, up 80 bps YoY; CPS non-GAAP gross margin 11.6%, down 230 bps YoY due to depreciation/investments for new programs and component shortages affecting revenue/profitability timing
  • Cash flow from operations $399M; free cash flow $342M
  • Guidance implied seasonality: Q3 revenue $3.2B-$3.5B, with ZT Systems $1.0B-$1.2B and core Sanmina $2.2B-$2.3B; full-year revenue $13.7B-$14.3B; FY26 non-GAAP op margin 6.3%-6.6%; FY26 non-GAAP diluted EPS $10.75-$11.35

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: repurchased ~1.1M shares for ~$160M during the quarter to offset remaining dilution for the year
  • Board authorization: additional $600M share repurchases with no expiration date
  • Balance sheet/liquidity: cash & cash equivalents $1.58B; no outstanding borrowings on $1.5B revolver; total liquidity ~ $3.7B
  • Net leverage ratio 0.56x; target long-term net leverage range 1.0x to 2.0x (expected to increase as working capital investment ramps)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • ZT integration: 3-phase plan; phase 1 largely complete (integrated core business and made most incremental power/liquid cooling/test cell capacity investments to be production-ready for next-gen accelerated compute)
  • ZT operations: won and shipped new accelerated compute business post-close; securing next-gen accelerated compute with hyperscale and OEM customers; finalizing production schedules
  • Manufacturing/technology focus in communications/AI compute: advanced optical systems/pluggables, IP routing/optical switching, liquid cooling investments, and expanding compute/storage system capabilities
  • Working capital/inventory: inventory $2.1B net of customer advances, up 75% YoY driven by ZT Systems acquisition; inventory turns (net of customer advances) 6.9x vs 5.9x prior year

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q3 FY26 guidance: revenue $3.2B-$3.5B; core Sanmina revenue $2.2B-$2.3B; ZT Systems revenue $1.0B-$1.2B; non-GAAP operating margin 6.4%-6.9%; effective tax rate 21%-23%; non-GAAP diluted EPS $2.55-$2.85 (midpoint $2.70); capex $95M
  • FY26 outlook: revenue $13.7B-$14.3B; core Sanmina expected to grow in high single digits; ZT Systems expected to finish well within $5B-$6B annualized range; non-GAAP operating margin 6.3%-6.6%; non-GAAP diluted EPS $10.75-$11.35
  • Confidence statement: increasing confidence in achieving $16B+ revenue in FY27

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Component shortages impacted timing of revenue and profitability for one CPS product business; company expects resolution in 2H FY26
  • ZT Systems revenue/margins subject to mix, consignment/customer agreements, and hyperscaler scheduling (timing nonlinearities emphasized)
  • CPS margin pressure: CPS non-GAAP gross margin down 230 bps YoY due to depreciation and investment-related expenses for new programs
  • Macro/geopolitical uncertainty acknowledged as part of outlook assumptions

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • ZT outperformance drivers & guidance confidence: Management said a customer requested an earlier pull-in of products originally scheduled for later quarters, with delivery enabled by strong execution and sufficient component availability. They confirmed no NVIDIA accelerated compute shipments; AMD-based only. They emphasized future new-generation platform demand and new hyperscaler/ODM wins rather than legacy products.
  • ZT margin sustainability: Management reiterated ZT Systems landed at ~6.4% non-GAAP operating margin this quarter, aligned with company guidance. They stated Q3 guidance was 6.4%-6.9% and implied Q4 to keep FY26 at 6.3%-6.6%. They cautioned sustainability depends on business mix and consignment/customer agreement finalization.
  • Communications segment composition & products: Management confirmed they are shipping ~1.6 terabyte switches as part of new product introductions for partner customers (not competing with them). They described communications growth across IP routing, optical systems, optical pluggables (400/800) and development of 1.6T pluggables. 5G was noted as a small 2%-3% of segment revenue.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SANM Q2 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for SANM.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (SANM)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Financial Profile