Sanmina Corporation

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Market Cap

Sanmina Corporation has a market capitalization of $9.95B.

Price: $185.56

2.08 (1.13%)

Market Cap: 9.95B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Jure Sola

Sector: Technology

Industry: Hardware, Equipment & Parts

IPO Date: 1993-04-14

Website: https://www.sanmina.com

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) - Company Information

Market Cap: 9.95B|Sector: Technology

Company Profile

Sanmina Corporation delivers comprehensive manufacturing services, encompassing components, finished goods, repair, supply chain management, and post-sale support on a global scale. Its operations are structured into two principal divisions: Integrated Manufacturing Solutions, and Components, Products and Services. The company's extensive service portfolio includes product ideation and engineering – from initial concept development and detailed design to prototyping, validation, pre-production, manufacturing readiness, and ultimate product industrialization. Furthermore, Sanmina provides assembly and testing, direct order shipping and logistics, post-market product maintenance and assistance, and end-to-end supply chain oversight. It also undertakes the production of individual components, subassemblies, and complete systems. Beyond these services, Sanmina offers a range of specialized products like interconnect systems (e.g., printed circuit boards, backplanes, cable assemblies, plastic injection molded parts), mechanical systems (such as custom enclosures and precision-machined components), advanced solutions in memory, storage, radio frequency, optics, and microelectronics, along with defense and aerospace-specific items, and cloud-enabled manufacturing execution software. The company primarily caters to original equipment manufacturers across diverse sectors, including industrial, healthcare, defense and aviation, automotive, telecommunications, and cloud computing. Established in 1980, Sanmina Corporation maintains its corporate headquarters in San Jose, California.

Analyst Sentiment

43%
Hold

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $131.00

▼ -29.4% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$62

Median

$131

High Bound

$200

Average

$131

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$131.00
▼ -29.40% Upside
Low Target
$62.00
-67% Risk
Median Target
$131.00
-29% Mid
High Target
$200.00
8% Max
Consensus
Hold
5 / 18 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ2 2026Q1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MJun 27, 2026Mar 28, 2026Dec 27, 2025Sep 27, 2025Jun 28, 2025Mar 29, 2025Dec 28, 2024Sep 28, 2024
Market Cap ($M)9,94612,7417,1018,3596,1185,2584,1704,1543,773
Enterprise Value ($M)10,53313,3297,6979,4095,5464,7843,8503,8873,531
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)32.5527.2519.0342.4031.7019.1516.2415.9715.37
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.740.8111.806.611.61
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.783.681.772.622.922.582.102.071.87
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)3.904.982.933.382.602.291.881.851.72
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)16.74539.8220.7690.9744.7832.1233.0688.67128.86
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)3.851.922.952.652.341.941.941.75
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)15.7659.4536.5974.7751.3637.9231.6631.5728.60
Debt to Equity Ratio0.880.950.901.010.170.160.170.170.17

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 SANMINA CORP (SANM) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Sanmina is an electronics manufacturing services (EMS) provider that supports customers across the product lifecycle—from early-stage engineering and prototype builds to high-volume manufacturing, logistics, and end-of-life services. The value chain typically begins with customer design intent, moves through design-for-manufacturing and systems engineering, then scales into complex manufacturing (including test, configuration, and quality systems), and ultimately extends into distribution, repairs, and warranty/after-market support.

This operating model embeds stickiness: once Sanmina has validated processes, fixtures, test programs, quality documentation, and supply-chain workflows for a specific product family, requalifying a new manufacturer becomes costly in time, engineering effort, and quality risk.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by manufacturing and systems integration work, with additional contributions from engineering services and after-market solutions. Monetisation is generally structured around:

  • Manufacturing/production services: largely transactional and volume-linked, but with margin sensitivity to mix (complex builds vs. simpler assembly), labor intensity, yield, and supply-chain execution.
  • Engineering and product lifecycle services: typically higher value than pure assembly, supporting better differentiation through NPI support, design-to-manufacture translation, and integrated testing/configuration.
  • After-market and services: more recurring in nature (repairs, returns, field service support, and ongoing logistics), which can smooth revenue volatility and improve lifecycle economics.

Key margin drivers are manufacturing complexity, service mix (engineering/test vs. commodity assembly), procurement discipline (including component sourcing and pass-through structures), and working-capital efficiency.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The durable competitive edge is best framed as a combination of switching costs, process and quality know-how, and global manufacturing scale that reduces execution risk for complex electronics programs.

  • High switching costs (program-level): requalification cycles, test development, regulatory/quality documentation, supplier certification, and engineering integration create friction for customers to move programs between EMS providers.
  • Engineering-to-manufacturing capability: customers value providers that can translate design intent into yield-optimized processes and robust testing—especially for high-mix, short-life-cycle, or feature-dense products.
  • Manufacturing network depth: geographic and operational coverage supports sourcing strategies, localization needs, and contingency planning—particularly important for customers managing risk across supply and demand cycles.

Competitive benchmarking:

  • Jabil (JBL): also a large EMS player with broad end-market exposure and scale-driven cost advantages. Jabil competes heavily on manufacturing footprint and diversified programs, while Sanmina often emphasizes complexity, engineering-enabled builds, and lifecycle support tied to customer product programs.
  • Flex (FLEX): competes across electronics manufacturing with strong capabilities in integrated design and supply-chain solutions. Flex’s strength frequently aligns with large global customers and platform-style programs, whereas Sanmina’s positioning tends to be more program- and engineering-process centric in complex electronics.
  • Celestica (CLS): focuses on high-complexity manufacturing and test-centric operations for certain industries. Celestica’s competitive frame can be similar on complexity; Sanmina differentiates through broader lifecycle service scope and integrated execution across the product journey.

Sanmina’s industry emphasis is skewed toward programs where engineering content, test rigor, and lifecycle support materially affect both cost and reliability—areas where switching costs are most pronounced.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, Sanmina’s opportunity is tied to structural outsourcing and product complexity trends that expand total addressable manufacturing and lifecycle services:

  • Rising electronics content per end product: industrial automation, networking and connectivity, data infrastructure, and advanced transportation platforms increase the volume of assemblies requiring sophisticated manufacturing and validation.
  • Outsourcing of engineering and lifecycle execution: customers increasingly outsource NPI, test development, configuration, and after-market obligations to reduce execution burden and improve speed-to-market.
  • Supply-chain resilience and localization: customers value manufacturing partners that can mitigate disruption risk through operational flexibility, multi-site execution, and disciplined sourcing strategies.
  • Higher test and reliability requirements: feature density and tighter tolerances raise the value of EMS providers that can deliver yield and quality at scale.
  • After-market and service expansion: extended product lifecycles and regulatory/quality expectations can increase demand for repairs, returns management, and field support—improving lifecycle economics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Cyclicality and utilization risk: EMS revenues and margins can fluctuate with customer production volumes; margin recovery depends on maintaining mix and operational discipline.
  • Customer concentration and program transitions: shifts in customer outsourcing strategy or timing of program ramps can pressure backlog and working capital.
  • Supply-chain volatility: component shortages, allocation dynamics, and pricing swings can compress margins if pass-through mechanisms are limited or procurement execution lags.
  • Quality and delivery execution: electronics manufacturing carries consequential warranty, scrap, and remediation costs; sustained quality performance is critical to retain programs.
  • Capital intensity and technology obsolescence: tooling, test capability, and engineering resources must keep pace with product changes; misalignment can create cost drag.
  • Geopolitical and trade restrictions: cross-border manufacturing and sourcing can face tariffs, export controls, and compliance requirements.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values EMS businesses through earnings power and cash conversion, often expressed via EV/EBITDA and/or revenue multiple frameworks that reflect cyclical earnings quality. Key valuation drivers include:

  • Operating margin stability: mix shift toward engineering/test and higher-complexity work can support margin durability.
  • Free cash flow conversion: working capital management (inventory, receivables, and payables) influences perceived earnings quality.
  • Service mix and lifecycle contribution: after-market and service content tends to reduce earnings volatility.
  • Order visibility and backlog quality: while programs can be lumpy, sustainable pipeline and customer retention matter for long-run earning capacity.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Sanmina’s long-term thesis rests on a structural advantage in complex electronics execution where switching costs are elevated and where engineering-to-manufacturing capabilities translate into durable customer program relationships. Competitive differentiation is reinforced by lifecycle services, global operational depth, and process/quality know-how—factors that can support improved mix and earnings resilience through industry cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for SANM.

zacks.com2026-07-31

Sanmina (SANM) Upgraded to Strong Buy: What Does It Mean for the Stock?

Sanmina (SANM) might move higher on growing optimism about its earnings prospects, which is reflected by its upgrade to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

zacks.com2026-07-31

Is Sanmina (SANM) Stock Undervalued Right Now?

Here at Zacks, our focus is on the proven Zacks Rank system, which emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find great stocks. Nevertheless, we are always paying attention to the latest value, growth, and momentum trends to underscore strong picks.

zacks.com2026-07-31

Best Growth Stocks to Buy for July 31st

SANM, U and NVDA made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) growth stocks list on July 31, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-31

Best Value Stocks to Buy for July 31st

EFOR, AER and SANM made it to the Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) value stocks list on July 31, 2026.

zacks.com2026-07-30

Here's Why Sanmina (SANM) is a Strong Value Stock

Whether you're a value, growth, or momentum investor, finding strong stocks becomes easier with the Zacks Style Scores, a top feature of the Zacks Premium research service.

zacks.com2026-07-29

How SANM is Turning Revenue Growth Into Higher Profitability

SANM is converting cloud and AI-driven revenue growth into stronger margins and earnings through disciplined execution and operational improvements.

zacks.com2026-07-29

Is SANM Stock a Buy After Strong Earnings and Higher AI Demand?

Sanmina Corporation SANM has delivered stronger-than-expected quarterly results while raising its fiscal outlook amid rising demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure. That has renewed investor interest in whether the stock still offers an attractive opportunity.

zacks.com2026-07-29

Can Sanmina Keep Winning in the AI Infrastructure Buildout?

SANM is expanding manufacturing, automation and AI systems capabilities to capture rising demand from cloud and accelerated computing platforms.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-29

Sanmina: Market Misses The Forest For The Trees (Rating Upgrade)

Sanmina Corporation reported a beat-and-raise Q3 report through AI-driven momentum, but the stock crashed by -17% regardless. SANM's financial momentum remains very strong in the core business. The outlook remains good as SANM gains from AI infrastructure growth. ZT Systems' volatility seems to have caused the market's strong reaction. The business's weak performance still seems transitory.

gurufocus.com2026-07-28

Sanmina Corp (SANM) Shares Fall 17.6% -- GF Value Says Still Overvalued

On July 28, 2026, Sanmina Corp (SANM) shares plummeted 17.6%, bringing the current price to $172.46. The stock has faced significant volatility recently, tradin

seekingalpha.com2026-07-28

Sanmina: Q3 Beat And Raised FY26 Guide Reinforce The Bull Case

Sanmina is rated Buy with a raised price target of $346, reflecting strong Q3 results and accelerated AI infrastructure growth. Q3 FY26 delivered an 8.0% non-GAAP operating margin and $3.31 EPS, both well above guidance, with FY26 and FY27 guidance raised. ZT Systems integration is ahead of plan, driving vertical integration, margin expansion, and customer diversification, positioning SANM as an AI-first EMS operator.

zacks.com2026-07-28

SANM Q3 Earnings Beat Estimates on AI Demand, Strong Execution

SANM tops fiscal Q3 earnings and revenue estimates as AI demand, cloud momentum and strong execution fuel growth and prompt higher full-year guidance.

zacks.com2026-07-28

Sanmina Q3 Earnings Call Signals AI Infrastructure Growth Strategy

SANM highlights AI infrastructure growth, ZT Systems integration, new customer wins and a raised fiscal outlook after strong Q3 results.

seekingalpha.com2026-07-27

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

marketbeat.com2026-07-27

Sanmina Q3 Earnings Call Highlights

Sanmina NASDAQ: SANM reported fiscal third-quarter revenue of $3.46 billion, up 69.7% from a year earlier, as growth in its core business and the contribution from ZT Systems lifted results. The company said revenue reached the high end of its outlook range, while non-GAAP operating margin and earnings per share exceeded its prior expectations.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-06-27

"SANM delivered a strong Q3’26: Revenue of $3.46B and Net Income of $117.1M (EPS $2.17). On a YoY basis, Revenue rose from $2.04B in Q3’25 to $3.46B in Q3’26 (+69.7%), while Net Income grew from $68.6M to $117.1M (+70.7%). QoQ, Revenue increased from $4.01B (Q2’26) to $3.46B (Q3’26 (-13.6%)), but Net Income improved from $93.6M to $117.1M (+25.1%). Profitability improved across the 4-quarter window as margins expanded: gross margin increased to ~10.5% in Q3’26 from ~8.9% in Q3’25, and net margin rose to 3.38% from 3.36% (QoQ up from 2.33%). Operating income margin also strengthened to ~6.4%. Cash flow quality looks solid for a cyclical business: operating cash flow was $124.5M in Q3’26, converting net income to cash, with modest free cash flow ($23.6M) after capex. Balance sheet resilience remains supported by equity, though net debt rose materially QoQ (net debt ~ $327M vs net debt ~ $596M earlier). Shareholder returns appear exceptionally strong: the stock is up 131.6% YoY (plus 30.8% over 6 months), with no dividend and no meaningful buyback data in the quarter; total return momentum is therefore driven primarily by capital appreciation."

Revenue Growth

Strong

YoY Revenue +69.7% (Q3’25 $2.04B to Q3’26 $3.46B); QoQ Revenue -13.6% (Q2’26 $4.01B to Q3’26 $3.46B), but trend still elevated versus last year.

Profitability

Strong

Net margin improved to 3.38% in Q3’26 (from 2.33% QoQ; ~3.36% YoY). Operating margin increased to ~6.4% vs ~5.7% QoQ and ~4.7% YoY.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Operating cash flow was $124.5M and free cash flow $23.6M in Q3’26. Conversion is positive but FCF remains modest versus earnings.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Total assets are ~ $9.74B with equity ~ $7.16B. Net debt improved sequentially (about -$0.47B in Q3’25 to +$0.33B in Q3’26), but balance sheet remains supported by substantial equity.

Shareholder Returns

Excellent

Price momentum is very strong: +131.6% 1Y. Dividend is 0; buybacks not evident in Q3’26 cash flow, so total return is dominated by capital appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus price target is $200 versus current ~$174 (moderate upside). Valuation metrics suggest a premium (e.g., P/E ~27), which tempers the score despite strong momentum.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

SANM delivered a strong Q3 FY2026 with revenue of $3.46B (+69.7% YoY), non-GAAP gross margin of 10.7% (+160 bps), and non-GAAP operating margin of 8.0% (+230 bps). Management emphasized mix benefits across Core Sanmina (IMS/CPS) and ZT Systems, plus higher-than-forecast non-recurring engineering services tied to pre-production labor for the next-generation accelerated compute program. The main forward-looking takeaway is timing: Q4 ZT revenue guidance is lower than last quarter’s implied range due to legacy program variability, and accelerated compute revenue recognition is pushed to Q1 FY2027. Cash flow risk is explicitly acknowledged—working capital is expected to build into Q4 and early next year as ramps accelerate. Despite some gross margin noise in CPS from investment-related depreciation, management reiterated a long-term non-GAAP operating margin framework of ~6%–7%. Net-net: operational momentum is real, but convertibility to near-term FCF depends on working-capital absorption and program timing.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Core Sanmina: strength across end markets with continued cloud and AI infrastructure momentum; Core Sanmina IMS up 14.1% YoY.
  • Non-recurring engineering services (pre-production labor) supporting margin and facilitating ramp for next-generation accelerated compute.
  • CPS: AI system rack metal fabrication and high-tech PCB aerospace/defense programs—CPS revenue up 29.2% YoY.

Business Development

  • ZT Systems integration: orders for next-generation accelerated compute expanded in Q3; validation/collaboration with AMD and joint customers during pre-production activities.
  • New platform win referenced: Cerebras additional platform business within Core Sanmina.
  • End-market customer expansion: communications networks/cloud & AI infrastructure adding new customers and projects for FY2027/2028.

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: $3.46B non-GAAP, high end of outlook; +69.7% YoY.
  • Operating margin: non-GAAP 8.0% in Q3; up 230 bps YoY (operating profit $275.8M).
  • Gross margin: non-GAAP 10.7% of revenue, up 160 bps YoY (gross profit $370M) driven by mix and non-recurring engineering services.
  • EPS: non-GAAP diluted EPS $3.31, above outlook; +116% YoY; ~55M shares outstanding.
  • IMS gross margin: 10.2%, up 270 bps YoY; mix and ZT Systems + non-recurring engineering services impact.
  • CPS gross margin: 12.8%, down 190 bps YoY but +120 bps sequentially; YoY decline attributed to depreciation/other expenses tied to investments for new programs.
  • Q4 operating margin guided 25 bps lower vs expectations while remaining strong (mix and ongoing engineering-service contribution referenced).
  • Q4 ZT Systems revenue guided lower vs prior-quarter implied range due to timing/legacy programs; accelerated compute revenue recognition not included in Q4.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: no repurchases in the quarter; ~$600M remaining under board-authorized repurchase program at quarter end.
  • Liquidity/leverage: cash & cash equivalents $1.84B; no outstanding borrowings on $1.5B revolver; net leverage 0.29x; long-term net leverage target 1.0x–2.0x.
  • Debt/financing capacity: substantial liquidity ~ $4B including term loan A delayed draw for future growth.

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Investments/capacity expansion: core Sanmina—AI system rack metal fabrication, high-tech PCB capabilities (AI + aerospace/defense), and capacity/equipment for new medium-voltage transformer business.
  • ZT Systems production readiness: incremental power, liquid cooling capabilities, test cell capacity, and automation for next-generation accelerated compute.
  • Integration execution: 3-phase plan—streamlining processes, building capabilities for production readiness, and pursuing vertical integration/synergies to expand addressable market across platforms.
  • Working capital: management expects working capital to build (pressures cash flow) as ramps accelerate (noted especially into Q4 and beginning next year).

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q4 FY2026 revenue: $3.3B–$3.6B (extra week included).
  • Q4 Core Sanmina revenue: $2.5B–$2.6B (segment range stated as “.5B to .6B”).
  • Q4 ZT Systems revenue: $0.8B–$1.0B (explicitly lower than last quarter’s implied guidance; legacy programs timing-driven).
  • Q4 non-GAAP operating margin: 7.5%–8.0%; other income/expense net expense ~ $30M; non-GAAP effective tax rate 21%–23%.
  • Q4 EPS: $3.05–$3.35 (midpoint $3.20 = +92% YoY); assumes ~55M fully diluted shares.
  • Q4 capex: $135M; depreciation ~ $50M.
  • FY2026 outlook: revenue $14.0B–$14.3B (midpoint implies +75% YoY growth per prepared/summary commentary); FY2026 non-GAAP operating margin 6.85%–7.25%; non-GAAP EPS $11.90–$12.20 (midpoint $12.05 ≈ +100% YoY).
  • Next contribution timing: next-gen accelerated compute program to begin contributing revenue in Q1 FY2027 and ramp thereafter.

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Margin durability: Q4 operating margin guided 25 bps lower (mix shift and engineering-service ramp-down over time implied).
  • ZT revenue timing volatility: Q4 lower ZT guidance attributed to a few legacy programs varying quarter-to-quarter based on customer timing; accelerated compute not included due to revenue recognition timing.
  • Working capital pressure: expected build ahead of core and ZT growth; tied to working capital investment and program ramp dynamics.
  • CPS gross margin headwind YoY: depreciation/other expenses from investments for new programs drove -190 bps YoY despite +120 bps sequential improvement.

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Operating margin bridge and durability: Analyst asked why Q3 margin beat while Q4 guides ~25 bps lower, linking to ZT mix and engineering services. Management attributed beat to mix (Core IMS/CPS, ZT) and higher-than-forecast non-recurring engineering services (pre-production labor), expecting long-term margin 6%–7%.
  • ZT growth rate and backlog clarity: Analyst questioned whether ZT could grow ~50% YoY in FY2027 given legacy programs. Management said FY2027 guidance not finalized but noted legacy accelerated compute “gone to zero”; current variability is timing in storage/general purpose compute, while core communications/cloud accelerated outside ZT.
  • Working capital/FCF modeling: Analyst asked how to model working capital and free cash flow as production racks build. Management confirmed working capital is expected to build as an investment that accelerated in Q3, with pressure into Q4 and early next year as programs ramp; final customer operating-model details will be clarified with FY2027 guidance.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SANM Q3 2026 (ended June 27, 2026) earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for SANM.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (SANM)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Financial Profile