BankUnited, Inc.

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Market Cap

BankUnited, Inc. has a market capitalization of $3.43B.

Price: $47.14

-0.13 (-0.28%)

Market Cap: 3.43B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Rajinder Singh

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 2011-01-28

Website: https://www.bankunited.com

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) - Company Information

Market Cap: 3.43B|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

BankUnited, Inc. operates as the bank holding company for BankUnited, a national banking association that provides a range of banking services in the United States. The company offers deposit products, such as checking, money market deposit, and savings accounts; certificates of deposit; and treasury, commercial payment, and cash management services. Its loans portfolio includes commercial loans, including equipment loans, secured and unsecured lines of credit, formula-based loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate term loans and lines of credit, mortgage warehouse lines, letters of credit, commercial credit cards, small business administration and U.S. department of agriculture product offerings, export-import bank financing products, trade finance, and business acquisition finance credit facilities; commercial real estate loans; residential mortgages; and other consumer loans. The company also offers online, mobile, and telephone banking services. As of December 31, 2021, it operated through a network of 63 banking centers located in 13 Florida counties; and 4 banking centers in the New York metropolitan area. The company was formerly known as BU Financial Corporation. BankUnited, Inc. was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in Miami Lakes, Florida.

Analyst Sentiment

64%
Buy

From 11 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $53.75

▲ +14.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$49

Median

$53

High Bound

$65

Average

$54

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$53.75
▲ +14.02% Upside
Low Target
$49.00
4% Risk
Median Target
$52.50
11% Mid
High Target
$65.00
38% Max
Consensus
Hold
9 / 29 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)3,4263,4373,3922,8172,6272,5422,8122,6852,130
Enterprise Value ($M)5,4875,4985,1484,6584,7905,2135,9606,0845,690
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)13.2013.8912.249.809.5510.8710.1410.929.91
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.202.857.14
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)1.617.697.183.905.465.465.705.214.20
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.191.141.110.930.890.881.000.960.79
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)9.50187.5127.1628.2422.34155.0315.1658.2815.70
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)12.3010.906.459.9511.1912.0811.8111.21
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)14.4167.2754.8247.5644.7055.3755.8160.4267.29
Debt to Equity Ratio5.410.690.650.791.001.071.291.531.48
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-6.4%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for BKU. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 BANKUNITED INC (BKU) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

BankUnited operates as a retail-focused commercial bank that intermediates between funding sources (primarily customer deposits) and earning assets (primarily loans and mortgage-related exposures). The value chain is straightforward: the bank attracts deposits, deploys capital into interest-earning assets, and earns the spread between what it pays for funding and what it receives from loans and securities. Fee-based earnings supplement net interest income through activities tied to loan production, servicing, and banking services. Customer stickiness is reinforced by practical banking switching costs—deposit relationships, automated payments, and established credit underwriting history tend to reduce churn.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation model is dominated by net interest income (NII), which is largely a function of:
  • Loan yield / asset mix (how much of the balance sheet is tied to higher-yielding loans or credit-intensive assets)
  • Cost of deposits (the bank’s ability to retain deposits without repricing them excessively)
  • Interest rate sensitivity (how quickly assets and liabilities reprice relative to one another)
Secondary revenue sources include:
  • Fee income from account services, mortgage-related activities, and other banking services
  • Mortgage and investment-related gains that may be episodic, depending on the bank’s balance-sheet actions and market conditions
For BKU-style deposit-funded banking, the margin engine tends to be less about “growth at any price” and more about maintaining a favorable spread while preserving credit quality and liquidity.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat thesis: regulatory-capital discipline + credit culture + funding cost advantage.
  • Regulatory moat: Banking is constrained by capital, liquidity, and risk-management requirements. Building and sustaining the governance, reporting, and capital base needed to operate at scale is a persistent barrier to entry.
  • Credit culture (process moat): Consistent underwriting standards and disciplined credit monitoring can protect the downside in cyclical periods. In residential and mortgage-adjacent lending, losses often emerge from underwriting deterioration and concentration risk; experienced risk management can materially shape long-run outcomes.
  • Cost of deposits (funding moat): A bank’s ability to attract and retain lower-cost deposits supports net interest margin stability. Deposit franchise quality can reduce the need for expensive wholesale funding during stress.
  • Customer switching costs: Payroll, bill pay, and established account relationships make switching inconvenient for retail customers and reduce deposit volatility.
Competitive benchmarking (primary peers):
  • Flagstar Bank (Flagstar / FTS) — mortgage and consumer-oriented focus with meaningful residential credit exposure.
  • New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) — residential-focused balance sheet with similar sensitivity to housing/credit cycles.
  • Comerica (CMA) — more diversified positioning across business banking and credit segments, typically with different mix and risk dynamics.
Contrast: BKU’s positioning emphasizes deposit-funded intermediation and mortgage-related earning assets, where funding costs and disciplined credit underwriting have outsized influence. Competitors with different asset mixes may experience different drivers of profitability, but the structural determinants—deposit pricing discipline, credit performance, and regulatory-capital execution—remain the critical battlegrounds.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the primary growth vectors are structural rather than cyclical:
  • Expansion and optimization of the deposit base: Growing stable deposits improves funding quality and can support margin resilience across interest rate cycles.
  • U.S. housing and mortgage servicing ecosystem: The mortgage system continues to produce origination, servicing, refinancing, and ancillary banking activity, supporting recurring fee opportunities and balance-sheet deployment.
  • Credit selection during normalized and stressed periods: As capital and underwriting standards tighten or loosen across the industry, well-managed banks can gain share by deploying capital with superior risk-adjusted discipline.
  • Operational scaling: Efficiency gains from better platform execution, risk systems, and branch/account servicing can improve the cost-to-income profile, supporting durable profitability.
TAM expansion is less about inventing new products and more about increasing share in core banking relationships—deposits, mortgage origination/servicing participation, and adjacent fee services—while maintaining a risk profile aligned with bank capital and regulatory requirements.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Credit risk and concentration: Mortgage-related and interest-rate-sensitive portfolios can experience loss severity and vintage deterioration during housing downcycles. Concentrations can amplify outcomes.
  • Interest rate risk: Net interest income is sensitive to the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. Persistent mismatch can pressure earnings and tangible book.
  • Liquidity and funding stress: Deposit volatility or reliance on higher-cost funding can compress margins and weaken capital metrics.
  • Regulatory and capital requirements: Changes in capital rules, stress testing expectations, or supervisory focus on risk management can constrain growth and require balance-sheet adjustments.
  • Operational and model risk: Banking performance depends on credit models, servicing operations, and fraud/controls; execution failures can create outsized losses.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value banks through tangible book value, return on equity (ROE), efficiency, and credit quality rather than growth multiples alone. Common decision variables include:
  • Price-to-tangible book (P/TBV): Sensitive to expected normalized profitability and tangible capital preservation.
  • ROE durability: Driven by NII stability, cost discipline, and credit losses.
  • Capital adequacy and risk-weighted assets: Influences growth capacity and downside protection.
Key drivers that move valuation in this sector are changes in expected credit performance, deposit cost trajectory, the stability of net interest margins, and the credibility of capital generation under different rate environments.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

BankUnited’s long-term investment case rests on the durability of its deposit-funded business model and the quality of its credit underwriting and risk management. The most defensible advantage is the combination of regulatory-capital discipline, a disciplined approach to credit in mortgage-related exposures, and a funding franchise that supports margin stability. Upside tends to come from disciplined balance-sheet execution through credit cycles, while downside is primarily tied to credit, liquidity, and interest-rate mismatch risks.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for BKU.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-24

Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week Of April 26

A weekly summary of dividend activity for Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers. Companies which changed their dividends. Companies with upcoming ex-dividend dates.

zacks.com2026-04-23

BankUnited Q1 Earnings Lag Estimates as Expenses & Provisions Rise Y/Y

BKU Q1 earnings miss estimates on higher expenses and credit loss provisions, and weaker loans though NII and fee income provide support.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-22

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

seekingalpha.com2026-04-22

BankUnited: Low Reserves Limit Upside

BankUnited is maintained at 'Hold,' reflecting cautious optimism amid strong deposit growth but concerns over reserve adequacy. BKU's core deposit growth and declining deposit costs support net interest margin, but sequential NIM compression in Q1 was greater than expected. Commercial real estate and non-depository financial institution exposures are manageable, with diversified CRE and low NDFI risk relative to peers.

zacks.com2026-04-22

BankUnited (BKU) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

The headline numbers for BankUnited (BKU) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-04-22

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Q1 Earnings and Revenues Miss Estimates

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.83 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.97 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.78 per share a year ago.

businesswire.com2026-04-22

BankUnited, Inc. Reports 1Q 2026 Net Income of $62 million, $0.83 Diluted EPS

MIAMI LAKES, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--BankUnited, Inc. Reports 1Q 2026 Results.

zacks.com2026-04-06

BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Is Up 2.31% in One Week: What You Should Know

Does BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) have what it takes to be a top stock pick for momentum investors? Let's find out.

zacks.com2026-04-03

Are You Looking for a High-Growth Dividend Stock?

Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does BankUnited (BKU) have what it takes?

zacks.com2026-04-02

3 Stocks in Focus That Hiked Dividends Recently Amid Geopolitical Tensions

TJX, BKU and DOO stand out as dividend growers amid volatility, offering steady payouts as inflation, labor concerns and geopolitical tensions weigh on markets.

businesswire.com2026-03-31

BankUnited, Inc. to Announce First Quarter 2026 Results

MIAMI LAKES, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--BankUnited, Inc. to announce first quarter 2026 results.

defenseworld.net2026-03-31

BankUnited, Inc. $BKU Shares Sold by Assenagon Asset Management S.A.

Assenagon Asset Management S.A. decreased its position in BankUnited, Inc. (NYSE: BKU) by 59.9% during the undefined quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 64,361 shares of the financial services provider's stock after selling 96,055 shares during the period. Assenagon

zacks.com2026-03-30

BankUnited Rewards Shareholders With a 6.1% Dividend Hike

BKU lifts quarterly dividend by 6.1% to 33 cents and expands buyback capacity to $250M, highlighting steady shareholder returns despite elevated debt.

defenseworld.net2026-03-29

BankUnited, Inc. (NYSE:BKU) Receives Average Rating of “Moderate Buy” from Brokerages

Shares of BankUnited, Inc. (NYSE: BKU - Get Free Report) have earned a consensus recommendation of "Moderate Buy" from the fourteen brokerages that are covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, six have given a hold rating, six have given a buy rating and one has

businesswire.com2026-03-26

BankUnited, Inc. Announces a 6% Increase in Quarterly Dividend

MIAMI LAKES, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $BKU--BankUnited, Inc. (NYSE:BKU) today announced that its Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.33 per common share, reflecting a 6% increase from the previous quarterly cash dividend of $0.31 per common share. The dividend will be payable on April 30, 2026, to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 10, 2026. About BankUnited, Inc. BankUnited, Inc. (NYSE: BKU), with total assets of $35.0 billion at December 31, 2025, is.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"BKU reported Q1’26 revenue of $446.9M and net income of $61.9M (EPS $0.81). Versus Q1’25, revenue declined (446.9M vs. 481.6M) while net income increased ($61.9M vs. $58.5M), implying net income up ~+5.8% YoY despite lower top-line. Sequentially (QoQ), revenue fell from $472.4M (Q4’25) to $446.9M (Q1’26), while net income eased from $69.3M to $61.9M (net income ~-10.7% QoQ). Profitability remained solid: net profit margin was 13.85% in Q1’26, slightly down vs. 14.66% in Q4’25 and up vs. 12.16% in Q1’25. Gross margin was 55.7%, contracting vs. Q4’25 (61.0%). The operating/earnings profile softened QoQ, but earnings resilience was better than revenue would suggest, supported by the company’s interest income/expense structure. Cash flow quality: operating cash flow was $30.0M (implied by the net change given net income and working capital movement) with free cash flow broadly supported by recurring earnings; dividends were paid (~$23.3M historically each prior quarter) but buybacks were limited. Total shareholder returns are strong: the stock is up +55.39% over 1 year, indicating meaningful capital appreciation. With a ~$53.75 consensus target vs. a ~$47.89 price (about +12% upside), valuation looks moderately supportive."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue declined QoQ (-5.3% from $472.4M in Q4’25 to $446.9M in Q1’26) and was lower YoY (-7.2% vs. $481.6M in Q1’25). The trajectory shows contraction rather than acceleration.

Profitability

Positive

Net income increased YoY (~+5.8%), while net margin improved YoY (Q1’26: 13.85% vs. Q1’25: ~12.16%) but slipped QoQ (vs. Q4’25: 14.66%). Gross margin contracted QoQ (55.7% vs. 61.0%), indicating some compression.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Earnings remain cash-generative with operating cash flow historically positive across quarters. Dividend payout appears steady (payout ratio ~0.38 per latest ratios). Buybacks are modest, so total cash returns are more dividend-led than capital-reduction-led.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

Balance sheet shows leverage but with equity broadly stable (total equity ~ $3.02B in Q1’26 vs. ~$3.05B in Q4’25). Total assets were ~ $35.4B, roughly flat QoQ, while net debt increased vs. Q4’25 (net debt ~$2.06B vs. ~$1.76B).

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong capital appreciation: 1-year price change of +55.39% materially boosts total return. Dividend yield is low (~0.69%), but the price momentum is a major positive.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target ~$53.75 vs. current ~$47.89 implies ~+12% upside. Given strong 1-year momentum, valuation is not cheap, but still offers moderate upside per street targets.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

BankUnited delivered Q1 2026 results with EPS $0.83 and earnings $62M, supported by year-over-year NIM expansion (+18 bps to 2.99%) and PPNR up to $106M (+~11.5%). Credit quality improved meaningfully: NPLs down 26% and criticized/classified down 12%, with ACL/NPL coverage improving (company cited 59% to 76%). However, the quarter also shows ongoing caution—charge-offs remain elevated (T12M 37 bps vs ~25 bps target), and management added ~$8M qualitative reserves tied to geopolitical uncertainty. Margin and earnings should be viewed through the lens of seasonality: NIDDA softness in Q1 drives quarter-over-quarter EPS/ROA volatility, while Q2 is typically the strongest deposit growth quarter. Management reiterated unchanged full-year guidance and emphasized that guidance risk is more about competitive lending spreads and NIDDA execution than Fed-cut timing. Buyback started ($1.3M shares) with < $200M remaining.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • NIDDA grew $875 million year-over-year (+11%); average NIDDA up about $1.5 billion
  • Credit improvement: NPLs down $98 million (-26%) and criticized/classified down $146 million (-12%) over the quarter
  • Net income up 5% and PPNR up 10% year-over-year with NIM expansion of 18 bps year-over-year
  • Operating momentum in title business: increased relationship intake (now bringing in >40 customers; ~50 average over last 3 quarters)

Business Development

  • Title business: adding >40 net new customers currently; average ~$3 million per relationship (range implied as $2–$3 million, clarified ~3m)
  • FX platform: added clients/accounts over last 6 months; customer count up over 100% from prior year
  • Integrated payments/timing: treasury platform upgrade and payments platform operating to support NTS/title and broader bank cross-sell

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Reported Q1 earnings $62 million; EPS $0.83 vs $58 million and $0.78 in Q1 prior year
  • NIM at 2.99% vs 2.81% prior year (+18 bps); NIM modeled within expected ranges and within guidance assumptions from December
  • PPNR $106 million vs $95.2 million prior year (+~11.5%)
  • From Q4 to Q1 seasonality: EPS declined 13 bps QoQ and ROA declined 9 bps (company attributes to NIDDA seasonality)
  • Deposit cost declined 6 bps QoQ (from 202 to $2.12B? disclosed as average cost of deposits declined 6 bps to $212 million in the quarter)
  • Provision and credit: qualitative reserves added ~$8 million for geopolitical uncertainty; provision expense elevated to $25 million with full-year guidance unchanged
  • Charge-offs: $36 million in the quarter; trailing 12-month charge-off rate 37 bps (management wants closer to 25 bps)
  • ACL/NPL coverage improved from 59% to 76% (company-level statement); later stated “coverage ratio ended at 87 basis points,” down a few bps QoQ

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: bought back 1.3 million shares (as promised)
  • Remaining buyback “dry powder”: just under $200 million
  • Wholesale funding: declined $70 million QoQ and $749 million year-over-year (used to describe deposit funding mix and cost)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Deposit strategy: goal #1 top-tier NIDDA growth; goal #2 transactional/payment processor with pricing discipline; goal #3 manage deposit costs (noted no forecasted Fed funds rate decreases to lean into)
  • Rate strategy execution: “series of rate cuts going in this week” on deposit front
  • Technology/ops: 2 large technology projects—upgrading treasury platform and operating payments platform; additional hiring in front office and fulfillment/back office for title operations
  • CRE risk/quality: weighted average debt service coverage $1.84; average loan-to-value 55.4%; office book improvement with weighted avg debt service coverage up to 1.78; office shrunk to ~16% traditional office and ~4% medical office
  • Loan production seasonality: C&I down $144 million QoQ (timing/utilization and financial statement timing), while CRE/mortgage warehouse lending up $76m/$77m respectively

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • No change to full-year guidance
  • Management reiterated risk framing for guidance: biggest risk is missing NIDDA guidance (company previously stated guide implies 12% NIDDA target in context of “higher for longer”)
  • Provision profile: management expects more of provision expense to be front-end loaded (skewed to first and second quarters rather than evenly across all four)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Deposit margin pressure via NIDDA seasonality (management explicitly flags quarter-over-quarter volatility; seasonality drives margin/revenue/EPS/ROE changes)
  • Credit: elevated net charge-offs; trailing 12-month charge-off rate 37 bps vs target closer to 25 bps; expects charge-offs to be front-loaded
  • Provision uncertainty: added ~$8 million qualitative reserves due to Middle East geopolitical uncertainty
  • Market competitiveness risk: very tight lending spreads (CRE tighter than C&I); management states this is a bigger guidance risk than whether the Fed cuts once or twice
  • Funding cost risk: reliance on brokered deposits increased; broker deposits described as more expensive than historical with unclear driver (management speculates possible war/geographic activity context)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Title business deposit softness/competition outlook and customer intake targets—Management explained title is highly seasonal, yet relationship intake increased: now bringing in >40 and ~50 average over last three quarters. They said competitive pressure exists, including larger and smaller banks, but BKU cites execution, integration with ERP providers, and an “early head start” as moat drivers.
  • Topic: Guidance/margin mechanics around Fed cuts and provision overlay interpretation—Management said the balance sheet is “very neutrally hedged” and Fed-cut timing should not materially affect guidance; biggest risk is NIDDA shortfall and loan pricing/credit spreads. On provision, they reaffirmed full-year guidance, stating qualitative $8m overlay is included and provision is front-end loaded rather than linear.
  • Topic: Credit quality specifics—charge-off industries/geography and expectation for NCO trajectory—Management answered elevated NCOs were largely from two industries: health care and transportation, with one Atlanta and one Florida geography concentration. They clarified charge-offs should generally be front-loaded; it’s hard to call exact quarter-by-quarter levels, but first-half should be higher.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BKU Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for BKU.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (BKU)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) Financial Profile