Brown & Brown, Inc.

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) Market Cap

Brown & Brown, Inc. has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: J. Powell Brown

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Insurance - Brokers

IPO Date: 1981-02-11

Website: http://www.bbrown.com

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Brown & Brown, Inc. markets and sells insurance products and services in the United States, Bermuda, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the Cayman Islands. It operates through four segments: Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage, and Services. The Retail segment offers property and casualty, employee benefits insurance products, personal insurance products, specialties insurance products, loss control survey and analysis, consultancy, and claims processing services. It serves commercial, public and quasi-public entities, professional, and individual customers. The National Programs segment offers professional liability and related package insurance products for dentistry, legal, eyecare, insurance, financial, physicians, real estate title professionals, as well as supplementary insurance products related to weddings, events, medical facilities, and cyber liabilities. This segment also offers outsourced product development, marketing, underwriting, actuarial, compliance, and claims and other administrative services to insurance carrier partners; and commercial and public entity-related programs, and flood insurance products. It serves through independent agents. The Wholesale Brokerage segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial and personal lines insurance through independent agents and brokers. The Services segment offers third-party claims administration and medical utilization management services in the workers' compensation and all-lines liability arenas, Medicare Set-aside, Social Security disability, Medicare benefits advocacy, and claims adjusting services. The company was founded in 1939 and is headquartered in Daytona Beach, Florida.

Analyst Sentiment

61%
Buy

From 19 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $88.50

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$88

Median

$89

High Bound

$89

Average

$89

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$88.50
▲ +50.36% Upside
Low Target
$88.00
50% Risk
Median Target
$88.50
50% Mid
High Target
$89.00
51% Max
Consensus
Hold
10 / 30 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MMar 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025Sep 30, 2025Jun 30, 2025Mar 31, 2025Dec 31, 2024Sep 30, 2024Jun 30, 2024
Market Cap ($M)21,71526,54031,04432,37435,20528,87229,21525,129
Enterprise Value ($M)28,77233,37937,82531,21238,52832,25732,03128,318
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)12.7425.1334.1935.0426.5934.3731.2124.44
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)0.926.411.200.9811.26
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)11.4215.9019.3325.9225.4226.5124.6321.78
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)1.722.122.512.795.164.494.524.17
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)90.1062.5962.09104.43179.6284.6770.0675.24
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)15.1420.0023.5524.9927.8229.6227.0124.54
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)43.8660.0371.5073.2771.4883.3575.5562.51
Debt to Equity Ratio0.640.630.640.670.590.630.580.71

BRO Growth Runway Model

Standard long term linear growth fade

Multi-Stage Discounted Cash Flow Sandbox

Market Price$58.86
Intrinsic Value$129.69
Market Alignment
Undervalued by 120.3%relative to calculated intrinsic value
9.00%
Exp: 18%18%
i

Growth runway slowdown

This value provides a time window for the growth rate to decline beyond Stage 1 toward the terminal rate. Longer windows are most useful for companies with high growth starting conditions or strong competitive advantages. This option stretches out the growth rate slowdown across 5, 10, or 15-year steps. A high-growth starting condition (exceeding a 25% initial growth rate) automatically applies a curve decay to simulate realistic, rapid market saturation.
i

Terminal growth rate

With long-term inflation between 3-5%, revenue must grow by that baseline to maintain flat real-world market share. This value sets the permanent terminal growth rate to factor into the valuation beyond the growth slowdown runway toward maturity.

3-Stage Financial Runway Horizon

🧠 Perpetuity Horizon Engine (Stage 3: Post-2035)

Terminal FCF Base$3.98B
Perpetuity TV Value$74.84B
Discounted TV (PV)$31.61B
TV Weighting %66.6%
⚠️
Financial Model Disclaimer & Risk Disclosure: This interactive scenario simulator is an educational sandbox provided strictly for informational and analytical research purposes. Core historical financial statements and consensus estimates are sourced directly via Financial Modeling Prep (FMP). All downstream outputs are entirely deterministic, hypothetical projections generated by combining automated mathematical formulas (including linear interpolation and Gaussian bell-curve decay models) with user-selected variables and third-party financial data inputs. Users assume all liability for trading decisions executed based on these sandbox calculations.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 BROWN & BROWN INC (BRO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Brown & Brown operates as an insurance intermediary, sourcing and structuring risk coverage for corporate and institutional clients across commercial lines and employee benefits. The firm’s value chain centers on (1) client advisory and underwriting support, (2) placement of insurance with carriers (including negotiating terms and coordinating submissions), and (3) ongoing risk management services—renewal management, claims advocacy, and benefits administration support where applicable.

Revenue is generated primarily through brokerage arrangements (commissions/contingent commissions) tied to the insurance premiums placed, complemented by fee-based services where clients purchase advisory, risk consulting, and benefits-related solutions. The operating model benefits from relationship depth: account history, carrier relationships, and servicing workflows create practical switching costs for customers and producers.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation model is dominated by premium-linked earnings:

  • Commission and contingent commission revenue: Earned as a percentage of premiums placed, with contingent elements tied to performance or profitability metrics under certain carrier arrangements.
  • Fee-based advisory and consulting: Related to risk management consulting, employee benefits services, and other agency services that are less directly tied to pure premium volume.
  • Service and renewal management: Recurring servicing activities that support retention and reduce churn, especially on complex accounts and multi-year programs.

Margin drivers typically include: (1) mix shift toward higher-value advisory/service work, (2) disciplined producer economics and expense leverage, and (3) the ability to maintain client retention through renewal execution and claims support. Brokerage economics are generally resilient to day-to-day underwriting risk because Brown & Brown does not assume the insurance risk itself.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Brown & Brown competes in a fragmented brokerage market where “relationship capital” matters. Its competitive position is reinforced by:

  • Customer & producer switching costs (relationship lock-in): Insurance accounts accumulate underwriting documentation, loss history, carrier-specific submission knowledge, and servicing routines. Changing brokers typically requires rebuilding the risk profile and re-negotiating carrier terms—creating friction that favors established incumbents.
  • Carrier access and market expertise: Effective placements depend on carrier relationships and technical underwriting knowledge. Expertise across lines (commercial insurance and employee benefits) supports better outcomes and renewal retention.
  • Scale and operating infrastructure for service depth: Brokerage scale improves staffing efficiency, system capability, and the ability to support complex claims and benefits administration.

Competitive benchmarking: Primary large-cap peers include Marsh & McLennan, Aon, and Willis Towers Watson. These firms are positioned as global multi-specialty brokers with broad geographic footprints. Brown & Brown’s competitive focus is typically characterized by building density in targeted markets and lines through local/regionally rooted operations, supported by acquisition-led expansion and service infrastructure. While Marsh/Aon/WTW emphasize global scale, Brown & Brown competes effectively by combining specialized service coverage with local relationships and integration of acquired agencies into a shared platform.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Structural premium growth and risk complexity: As corporate risk management requirements increase (regulatory compliance, cyber, workforce-related liabilities, supply chain exposure), clients tend to rely more on brokers for advisory and renewal optimization.
  • Share gains via benefits and specialized brokerage services: Expansion into employee benefits administration and advisory services can lift fee-based revenue and deepen client relationships.
  • Outsourcing of risk management: Employers often prefer external expertise for claims advocacy, coverage analysis, and benefits services, supporting a recurring servicing component to revenue.
  • Acquisition pipeline and disciplined integration: The brokerage sector remains fragmented, enabling long-term growth through acquiring agencies with client relationships. Value creation depends on disciplined underwriting of acquisitions, salesforce retention, and operational integration.
  • Net retention and account durability: Renewal management quality and proactive claims support contribute to retention, which compounds revenue stability over multi-year horizons.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Insurance market cycle and pricing dynamics: Commission economics can be pressured when premium growth slows or when carriers change underwriting appetite, pricing, or compensation structures.
  • Contingent commission/fee regulation and carrier economics: Changes in how brokers are compensated (including regulatory scrutiny of certain contingent arrangements) can affect revenue mix.
  • Producer concentration and retention: Brokerage performance relies on producer relationships. Talent attrition or underperformance of key producers can reduce renewal flow.
  • Acquisition integration risk: M&A can dilute margins if integration is poorly executed or if client/producers do not remain with the platform.
  • Operational and cyber risk: Handling sensitive client data and benefits information creates exposure to data breaches and business interruption.
  • Reputation and claims-service execution: While Brown & Brown does not underwrite policies, client outcomes and claims advocacy quality influence retention and carrier relationships.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity markets often value insurance brokers using earnings-based multiples (e.g., EV/EBITDA or P/E) rather than revenue alone, reflecting the industry’s focus on operating leverage, retention, and recurring servicing income. Key valuation sensitivities typically include:

  • Revenue quality and retention: Higher retention and stable renewal economics support sustained earnings power.
  • Margin durability: Operating expense discipline and mix toward fee-based/services can support margins.
  • Deal execution: Market perception of acquisition discipline and integration success affects forward multiples.
  • Interest-rate backdrop (second-order): Investment income on certain funds/float structures and cost of capital can influence earnings, although underwriting risk is not borne on the balance sheet.

In brokerage, valuation typically moves with expectations for long-term retention, the stability of carrier compensation, and the ability to convert market fragmentation into accretive growth.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Brown & Brown’s long-term thesis rests on durable relationship-based switching costs, operating scale that supports high-quality servicing, and acquisition-led growth in a fragmented brokerage market. The business model generates earnings tied to premium placement and renewal servicing while avoiding direct underwriting risk, supporting resilience across insurance cycles. The primary question for investors is the sustainability of retention and producer economics, alongside disciplined M&A integration and compensation structure stability.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for BRO.

globenewswire.com2026-06-05

Brown & Brown strengthens private equity and M&A services capabilities, appoints Corey Lewis as retail global head of tax insurance

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla., June 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Brown & Brown, Inc. (“the Company”) today announced the appointment of Corey Lewis as retail global head of tax insurance, joining the firm's private equity and M&A services practice.

zacks.com2026-06-04

Implied Volatility Surging for Brown & Brown Stock Options

Investors need to pay close attention to BRO stock based on the movements in the options market lately.

zacks.com2026-05-27

Why Is Brown & Brown (BRO) Down 9.7% Since Last Earnings Report?

Brown & Brown (BRO) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock?

zacks.com2026-05-22

4 Insurance Brokerage Stocks to Gain From Demand and M&A

Zacks Insurance Brokerage players like AJG, AON, BRO and WTW are likely to benefit from increased demand for insurance products, strategic acquisitions and the adoption of technology.

gurufocus.com2026-05-18

Is It Too Late to Buy Brown & Brown Inc (BRO) After 4.3% Rally? GF Value Says Undervalued

On May 18, 2026, Brown and Brown Inc (BRO) shares rose 4.3% to a current price of $58.69. This price performance is notable as it oscillates between a 52-week hig

seekingalpha.com2026-05-09

10 Dividend Growth Stocks: May 2025

Dividend growth stocks have a streak of at least 5 consecutive years of dividend increases. I rank a selection of dividend growth stocks and present the top 10 stocks for consideration. To rank stocks, I do a quality assessment and sort candidates by quality scores. My new quality scoring system rates dividend stocks on a 10-point scale across 9 weighted factors. Each factor blends qualitative signals and quantitative metrics.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-29

Brown & Brown: No Significant Upside After 1Q26

Brown & Brown (BRO) remains fundamentally strong but is overvalued at current levels, warranting a 'Hold' rating. Despite robust M&A execution and insider alignment, BRO's premium valuation is unsupported by slowing organic growth and sector headwinds. I lower my price target to $58/share, reflecting reduced growth forecasts (7-8%) and increased sector risks, especially in flood insurance.

seekingalpha.com2026-04-28

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

zacks.com2026-04-28

Brown & Brown Q1 Earnings Top Estimates on Higher Commissions

BRO Q1 earnings beat estimates as higher commissions, investment income and EBITDAC drive growth, despite flat organic revenues and rising expenses.

zacks.com2026-04-27

Brown & Brown (BRO) Reports Q1 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

The headline numbers for Brown & Brown (BRO) give insight into how the company performed in the quarter ended March 2026, but it may be worthwhile to compare some of its key metrics to Wall Street estimates and the year-ago actuals.

zacks.com2026-04-27

Brown & Brown (BRO) Tops Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates

Brown & Brown (BRO) came out with quarterly earnings of $1.39 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.36 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.29 per share a year ago.

zacks.com2026-04-23

Is a Beat in the Cards for Brown & Brown This Earnings Season?

BRO's Q1 2026 results are likely to reflect acquisitions, new business, higher commissions and improved investment income.

zacks.com2026-04-22

Brown & Brown (BRO) Q1 Earnings on the Horizon: Analysts' Insights on Key Performance Measures

Get a deeper insight into the potential performance of Brown & Brown (BRO) for the quarter ended March 2026 by going beyond Wall Street's top-and-bottom-line estimates and examining the estimates for some of its key metrics.

defenseworld.net2026-04-22

Davidson Kahn Capital Management LLC Acquires 7,822 Shares of Brown & Brown, Inc. $BRO

Davidson Kahn Capital Management LLC increased its holdings in Brown and Brown, Inc. (NYSE: BRO) by 30.7% during the undefined quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 33,290 shares of the financial services provider's stock after purchasing an additional 7,822 shares

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"BRO (Q1’26, ended 2026-03-31) reported revenue of $1.90B and net income of $426M (EPS $1.28). YoY, revenue increased ~+52.1% (from $1.25B in Q2’25) while net income increased ~+81.6% (from $235M in Q2’25). QoQ, revenue rose ~+13.9% (from $1.67B in Q4’25) and net income climbed ~+61.4% (from $264M in Q4’25), indicating a notable earnings acceleration versus the top line. Profitability appears mixed over the 4-quarter window: gross margin expanded sharply on the latest quarter versus Q4’25 (52.3% vs 83.8%) but remains lower than Q2’25’s 48.8%/Q3’25’s 50.6% range, suggesting volatility driven by mix/cost timing. Net margin improved sequentially (22.4% vs 15.8% in Q4’25), while operating income ratios remain incomplete in the dataset. Cash flow quality is weaker on a cash basis: operating cash flow was $262M in Q1’26 versus $444M in Q4’25, and free cash flow was $262M (capex shown as $0). On balance sheet, leverage improved versus Q4’25 with net debt falling to $4.73B from $6.84B, and equity held steady at ~$12.6B. Shareholder returns are currently pressured: shares are down ~43% over 1Y with minimal visible yield (dividend yield near ~0.2%)."

Revenue Growth

Positive

QoQ revenue up ~+13.9% ($1.67B to $1.90B). YoY comparison using Q2’25 shows revenue up ~+52.1%, indicating strong underlying momentum.

Profitability

Caution

Net margin improved QoQ (22.4% vs 15.8%), but gross margin is volatile (52.3% vs 83.8% in Q4’25). Overall profitability direction is positive for earnings but not consistent at the gross level.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow declined QoQ ($444M to $262M). Free cash flow remained ~flat vs operating cash flow with capex reported as $0, so cash conversion is not showing improvement.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Net debt improved to ~$4.73B from ~$6.84B in Q4’25. Total equity stayed stable around ~$12.5–$12.6B, suggesting resilience.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total return is pressured: price is down ~-43% over 1Y and dividend yield is very low (~0.2%). No buyback activity is evident in the latest quarter.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target (~$88.5) is modestly above the current price ($67.72), implying some upside. However, the stock’s recent momentum is negative (1Y down sharply).

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Q1 2026 showed strong top-line momentum (+35.4% revenue to $1.9B) and continued profitability expansion with EBITDAC margin rising 40 bps to 38.5% and adjusted EPS increasing ~8% to $1.39. Growth quality is mixed: organic growth excluding contingents was flat, pressured by prior-year flood claims processing comparisons (~-100 bps) and ongoing CAT property rate declines (placements down 15%–35%). Specialty Distribution offset this with underwriting profitability and higher contingents, lifting EBITDAC margin 30 bps to 40.8%, while Accession drove $445M of revenue but hurt margins via ~200 bps temporary phasing (full-year Accession margin target ~35%). Cash generation remained solid (> $260M CFO, +23%), though conversion slipped due to Accession integration cost and higher earnouts. Management expects continued contingent strength and sequential organic improvement, but cautions that Retail pharmacy consulting shifts (volume to PEPM) temporarily weigh on growth by 50–100 bps over the next couple quarters.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Specialty Distribution contingent commissions growth driven by underwriting profitability ($30 million favorable underwriting performance) and continued strong program-level discipline
  • Retail sequential organic improvement expectation despite headwinds from pharmacy consulting revenue model change (volume-based to PEPM) and operating model blending
  • AI automation scaling: agents automating 25%+ of end-to-end submission processes; policy checking agents reducing manual proposal comparisons and E&O exposure

Business Development

  • Accession acquisition contribution: $445 million total Q1 revenue; $22 million of contingent commissions from Accession; $30 million–$40 million EBITDA synergies expected in 2026
  • Carriers/MGA dynamics mentioned generally (no named carriers) with potential for increased CAT property aggressiveness by some in Q2
  • Carrier billing portal integration platform enabling automatic billing data extraction/validation (no named carriers)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenues: $1.9 billion, +35.4% YoY
  • Organic growth ex-contingents flat YoY; contingents increased +2.2%; organic impacted by prior-year flood claims processing revenue (~-100 bps impact to organic metrics)
  • EBITDAC margin: 38.5%, +40 bps YoY
  • Adjusted EPS: $1.39, nearly +8% YoY
  • Cash flow from operations: >$260 million, +$50 million (+23%) YoY; CFFO/revenue ~14% vs ~15% prior year due to Accession integration cost and higher-than-anticipated final earnout payments
  • Accession margin headwind: adjusted EBITDAC margin negatively impacted by ~200 bps in Q1; full-year Accession adjusted EBITDAC margin target ~35%
  • Effective tax rate: 22.8% vs 21.8% prior year; driven by increased certain state taxes
  • Retail segment: EBITDAC margin -130 bps to 36% (mix/quarterly weighting offset by management of expenses and net benefit ~40–60 bps from departed customers to the startup broker)
  • Specialty Distribution EBITDAC margin: +30 bps to 40.8% driven by higher contingents, partially offset by lower prior-year flood claims processing revenue

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchases: $350 million; reduced share count by ~5 million shares over last 6 months (also referenced in Q1 discussion)
  • Delevering + balanced capital deployment: share repurchases, M&A, dividends, and delevering (no explicit debt level/cash runway given in transcript)
  • Dividends: paid per share +10% YoY

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Retail operating model update: blending Accession regional sales model and Brown local sales model into a new specialization model; driven by Steve Hearn’s leadership and industry/line/coverage specialization
  • Pharmacy consulting revenue model change: volume-based to PEPM over the next several quarters; expected to negatively impact Retail organic growth by 50–100 bps over the next couple quarters, with growth expected to return toward end of year
  • AI/automation operational impacts: AI agents automate 25%+ of end-to-end submission process for many programs/wholesale businesses; policy checking and billing-portals platform saving >50,000 hours annually; redirects incremental underwriting capacity to revenue-growth activities
  • Specialty Distribution growth outlook: anticipating relatively flat organic growth ex-contingents in Q2 due to heavy weighting of CAT property placements; improving growth in 2H as CAT exposure reduces and Accession’s “180” businesses contribute (less property, more casualty)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Admitted P&C markets: flat to up 5% YoY (moderated slightly vs Q4)
  • Workers’ comp: flat to down 3% (few states modest increases); non-CAT property: down 5% to up 5%; casualty primary layers: up 2% to 5%; excess layers increasing more materially
  • Q2 setup: rates “definitely under pressure like they were in the first quarter” (with potential unusual late-quarter movements); Q2 described as heavy property quarter
  • CAT timing: limited CAT property placement in Q3 and none until back end of year; management would not opine on Q4 CAT property rates yet
  • Disclosed contingency comment: based on Q1 performance, contingent commissions for the entire company expected to be up this year

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • CAT property pricing pressure: CAT property rates down 15% to 35% this quarter; risk that some carriers/MGAs could become more aggressive with CAT placements in Q2 (pricing variability)
  • Flood claims comparison distortion: prior-year flood claims processing revenue created ~-100 bps organic impact; Specialty Distribution organic metrics also negatively impacted by ~300 bps due to $12 million flood claims processing revenue recognized in 1Q prior year
  • Retail organic headwinds: pharmacy consulting revenue model change expected to reduce organic growth by 50–100 bps over next couple quarters
  • Cash flow pressure vs revenue: Accession integration cost and higher-than-anticipated earnout payments reduced CFFO/revenue ratio to ~14%
  • Geopolitical/oil cost effects: customers taking slightly more cautious outlook and balancing cost pass-through decisions
  • E&O/cancellation risk from AI/policy digitization framed as potential direct-to-consumer broker substitution risk (not quantified)

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Retail operating model & incentives: Management clarified that the shift is a blend of legacy Brown local and Accession regional sales approaches into a unique specialization model. Producers gain access to more capabilities; leadership said early reception from producers has been positively received and is not meant to mirror large competitors’ structures.
  • Updated contingent outlook & volatility: Analysts asked how Q1 contingency strength relates to prior guidance. Management said contingent commissions for the entire company are expected to be up this year, with upside likely flowing through versus last year’s ~$255 million baseline, but they emphasized program-level profitability discipline and controlled underwriting rigor over industry softness.
  • CAT property rate assumptions and timing: Management explained Q2 is a heavy property quarter with rates under pressure similar to Q1, while timing can be affected by late-cycle events. They noted limited CAT placement in Q3 (industry also doesn’t) and declined to forecast Q4 CAT property rates due to storm-season uncertainty.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BRO Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) Financial Profile