Goosehead Insurance, Inc

Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) Market Cap

Goosehead Insurance, Inc has a market capitalization of .

No quote data available.

CEO: Mark K. Miller

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Insurance - Diversified

IPO Date: 2018-04-27

Website: https://www.goosehead.com

Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) - Company Information

Market Cap: -|Sector: Financial Services

Company Profile

Goosehead Insurance, Inc. operates as a holding company for Goosehead Financial, LLC that provides personal lines insurance agency services in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Corporate Channel and Franchise Channel. It offers homeowner's, insurance, automotive, dwelling property insurance, flood, wind, earthquake, excess liability or umbrella, motorcycle, recreational vehicle, general liability, property, and life insurance products and services. As of December 31, 2021, the company had 2,151 total franchises. Goosehead Insurance, Inc. was founded in 2003 and is headquartered in Westlake, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

65%
Buy

From 13 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $61.50

▲ +0.0% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$52

Median

$57

High Bound

$85

Average

$62

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$61.50
▲ +60.37% Upside
Low Target
$52.00
36% Risk
Median Target
$56.50
47% Mid
High Target
$85.00
122% Max

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

Sentiment volume allocation data unavailable.

Historical valuation matrix unavailable.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 GOOSEHEAD INSURANCE INC CLASS A (GSHD) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Goosehead operates as an insurance intermediary focused on personal lines (notably homeowners, auto, and umbrella) through an independent-agency model. The economics sit between carriers and consumers: Goosehead recruits and supports licensed insurance professionals (agency partners), sources customers, and helps match policyholders with appropriate carrier products. The agency then services the customer through onboarding, policy maintenance, claims support, and renewals.

This structure creates customer stickiness around the “agent-of-record” relationship. Policy administration, claims handling, and risk profile documentation are operationally intensive and become increasingly familiar to the agency, raising the practical cost of switching.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily commission-based, earned as a percentage of premium written with partner carriers. Monetisation is therefore closely tied to: (1) growth in policies and premium volume, (2) retention/renewal rates, and (3) commission and service fee terms negotiated within carrier contracting frameworks.

Margin drivers typically include: operating leverage from scaling lead flow and back-office support across agencies; efficiency of customer acquisition and underwriting placement; and stability of carrier commission structures. While the business is exposed to carrier appetite and pricing cycles, Goosehead’s core profitability is driven more by distribution effectiveness and service productivity than by underwriting risk.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Goosehead’s moat is best characterized as a combination of switching costs (policy/service relationship), agent recruitment and retention (talent scale), and platform-enabled economics (repeatable distribution and support capabilities). The agency model benefits from institutional knowledge and operational routines: once a customer’s coverage and claims history are integrated into the agency’s workflow, replacement effort rises for the customer and risk of service disruption rises for the new agency.

  • Switching Costs / Service Gravity: Claims assistance, documentation, coverage optimization, and renewal coordination create an incremental “attachment” to the agency that is not easily replicated by a new entrant.
  • Distribution Scale + Support Infrastructure: Central support improves productivity per agent, enabling more efficient conversion of leads into bound business and improving renewal throughput.
  • Carrier Access and Contracting: Strong performance and underwriting placement can support favorable carrier relationships, which affects the breadth and competitiveness of quotes available to customers.

Competitive benchmarking: Goosehead competes in personal-lines distribution and customer acquisition against both independent-agency aggregators and large carriers’ direct channels.

  • Brown & Brown (BRO) and HUB International (HUBG) represent scale-oriented independent brokerage models that provide multi-line coverage through broad agency networks.
  • Allstate (ALL) and State Farm represent direct/captive distribution with strong brand and captive agency channels for consumer acquisition.

Positioning contrast: Goosehead’s emphasis is on high-touch independent distribution for personal lines, combining agent-centric execution with a standardized platform for lead generation, service, and carrier placement—distinct from captive insurer distribution and from broader, less consumer-specialized independent brokerage models.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Penetration expansion in independent personal-lines brokerage: Continued consumer willingness to shop for coverage and rely on advisors supports share shift from direct/captive channels to independent distribution where customers value comparison and service.
  • Agency partner growth and productivity: Recruiting and scaling productive agent partners expands distribution capacity. Platform support can improve throughput and retention, extending growth beyond lead volume alone.
  • Renewal durability through service quality: Personal-lines insurance is inherently renewal-driven. Durable retention compounds policy count over time, supporting long-run premium growth even when new-sales volume is more cyclical.
  • Broader coverage packaging and cross-sell: Customers with existing policies often add umbrella and additional products when service processes and carrier options are accessible within the same advisor relationship.

Over a 5–10 year horizon, the addressable market expands through (a) net new household formation, (b) ongoing premium growth from pricing and coverage upgrades, and (c) mix shift toward advisor-led distribution—while operational leverage from scaling the platform supports margins as policy count grows.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commission and carrier-contract pressure: Carriers can adjust commission structures, underwriting rules, or placement preferences, impacting revenue per dollar of premium.
  • Catastrophe and cycle effects on carrier appetite: Even with commission-based economics, carrier tightening during adverse loss environments can affect quote availability and conversion rates.
  • Regulatory and licensing risk: Insurance distribution is regulated at the state level, making compliance, licensing, and product rules an ongoing operational requirement.
  • Concentration of distribution economics: Dependence on lead channels, carrier relationships, and execution quality creates vulnerability if any input deteriorates.
  • Operational and technology execution: Growth in agencies increases complexity in onboarding, service workflows, data handling, and claims coordination. Weak execution can erode retention.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets typically value insurance intermediaries through EV/EBITDA or P/S frameworks rather than traditional property & casualty underwriting multiples, because the earnings profile is tied to distribution performance and policy growth rather than balance-sheet underwriting risk. The key valuation drivers include:

  • Durable policy retention and renewal economics, which anchor revenue visibility.
  • Operating leverage as agency and premium volume scale against a relatively fixed platform cost base.
  • Conversion efficiency (lead-to-bind) and underwriting placement rates that influence revenue velocity.
  • Commission stability and the sustainability of carrier contracting terms.

In this sector, sustained valuation support usually requires evidence of (1) persistent growth in policies/premium, (2) retention resilience through cycles, and (3) margin discipline as the agency footprint expands.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Goosehead’s long-term thesis rests on an advisor-led distribution model with structural stickiness from the agent-of-record relationship, reinforced by platform-enabled scale. The business is positioned to benefit from continued consumer preference for comparison and service in personal lines, while its financial profile depends primarily on retention, commission stability, and execution quality in carrier placement. The investment case strengthens when policy/service durability and operating leverage can be sustained through insurance market cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"GSHD reported Revenue of $93.1M and Net Income of $4.9M in the latest quarter (EPS $0.20). YoY, Revenue rose +23.2% (from $75.6M) and Net Income more than doubled (+108.9% from $2.3M). QoQ, Revenue declined -11.6% (from $105.3M) while Net Income fell -60.7% (from $12.4M), indicating significant quarter-to-quarter earnings volatility. Net margin slipped from 11.8% QoQ to 5.3% in the latest quarter, but it remains higher than a year ago (3.1%). Over the 4-quarter window, profitability appears lumpy rather than steadily improving. Cash-flow specifics (free cash flow/operating cash flow and coverage) were not provided, and the equity base is negative throughout the period, which raises resilience concerns. Total assets decreased QoQ (from $414.9M to $392.8M) while net debt is much lower on a reported basis in the latest quarter ($32.2M vs $317.9M prior quarter), but total equity deteriorated (−$162.8M to −$204.2M), suggesting balance-sheet pressure persists. Shareholder returns are weak: the stock is down −59.6% over the last 1 year and the current dividend yield is effectively 0. Despite a consensus upside implied by the $70.5 target, the recent momentum and equity fragility keep the overall setup unattractive."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Latest Revenue $93.1M was down -11.6% QoQ (vs. $105.3M) but up +23.2% YoY (vs. $75.6M), showing improvement year-over-year but a weaker most-recent quarter.

Profitability

Neutral

Net Income fell -60.7% QoQ ($12.4M to $4.9M) even though it rose +108.9% YoY ($2.3M to $4.9M). Net margin contracted QoQ (11.8% to 5.3%), implying profitability volatility.

Cash Flow Quality

Caution

Net income improved YoY, but operating cash flow and dividend/buyback funding are not provided. Dividend yield is now ~0, limiting confidence on shareholder cash-return capacity.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Total equity remains negative across all quarters and worsened in the latest quarter (from −$162.8M to −$204.2M). Total assets also declined QoQ (−5.3%), indicating reduced balance-sheet cushion.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total shareholder return is materially negative based on price: 1Y change is −59.6%. Dividend contribution is effectively absent in the latest quarter (yield ~0). No buyback data provided.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target ($70.5) suggests substantial upside versus the $43.85 price (~+61%). However, the stock’s strong negative 1Y momentum and weak earnings/balance-sheet signals temper confidence.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

Goosehead delivered a strong Q1 2026 start: revenue +23% YoY to $93.1M, core revenue +15% to $79.5M, and adjusted EBITDA $24.4M (26% margin). Management attributes performance to early payoff from Digital Agent 2.0 and AI-enabled service efficiency, alongside a stabilizing pricing/product environment that is supporting retention and agent productivity. The key operational shift is partner-distributed digital quote-and-bind in Texas, expanding beyond auto into homeowners with carriers including SageSure and Mercury, while maintaining safeguards/kick-outs to protect underwriting quality and customer outcomes. Financially, contingent commissions surged (+141% YoY to $11.9M), but guidance was kept intact with full-year contingent commissions still framed at 60–85 bps of written premiums. Capital returns were significant (repurchased $49.8M of shares) with conservative leverage (no new leverage beyond 3–4x TTM EBITDA). The main watch item remains renewal automation/disintermediation risk and the durability of commission-rate tailwinds.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Digital Agent 2.0 enabling digital/partially-digital quote-and-bind in Texas for multiple homeowners products; expanded from prior auto-carrier launches to include homeowners digital binding with SageSure and Mercury
  • AI virtual phone assistant (“Lilly”) resolving ~19% of inbound calls without transfer to live agents
  • Intelligent case routing automation allowing redeployment of service labor (reinvested roughly 40 FTE) toward higher-value interactions
  • Improving product market dynamics (pricing stabilization, expanded availability) supporting higher retention, agent productivity, and rising quote/package rates
  • Faster corporate/franchise growth: 3 new corporate offices opened in Q1 (Seattle, Washington D.C. area, Minneapolis) plus April Indianapolis opening; 12 new franchises launched since beginning of year, each outpacing typical franchise production

Business Development

  • Named auto carriers already on Digital Agent: Progressive, Liberty Mutual, Mercury, Root (Texas)
  • New Digital Agent 2.0 homeowners digital bind in Texas with carriers such as SageSure and Mercury
  • Enterprise partnership reach referenced: ~2.3 million potential clients via mortgage origination/servicing partners; ~4 million potential clients via other home and financial services organizations
  • Enterprise sales team growth supported by partnership engine scaling (human fulfillment of partner engine)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Reported revenue +23% YoY to $93.1 million; core revenue +15% YoY to $79.5 million
  • Adjusted EBITDA $24.4 million, +57% YoY; adjusted EBITDA margin 26%
  • Contingent commissions (ancillary revenue) $11.9 million, +141% YoY; full-year contingent commissions guidance unchanged at 60–85 bps of total written premiums
  • Seasonality/cadence noted: Q1 includes outsized contingency true-ups/uncertainty relative to history; management did not lower full-year revenue guidance despite strong contingent quarter
  • Client retention expectation: achieve 86% client retention during the year
  • State mix: Texas premium 37% in Q1 (down from 39% at end of Q4), supporting diversification into geographies where carriers want growth

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Share repurchase: repurchased and retired 985,000 Class A shares for $49.8 million
  • Remaining authorization: opportunistic use of remaining $148 million on existing share repurchase authorization
  • Liquidity/credit: $22.9 million cash flow from operations; drew $26 million on existing revolving credit facility
  • Cash and cash equivalents: $26 million at quarter end; total debt outstanding: $324 million

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • AI automation: Lilly resolves ~19% of inbound calls; intelligent case routing reassigns ~40 service FTE toward higher-value interactions
  • Digital Agent go-to-market: largely partner-distributed (not focused on advertising to drive traffic to goosehead.com); designed to ensure good experience for carrier/agent ecosystem
  • Digital safeguards: platform includes eligibility “kick outs” so customers are routed to agents when a digital-eligible carrier match is not appropriate
  • Corporate expansion: opened three additional corporate offices in Seattle, Washington D.C. area, and Minneapolis; 4th opening in April in Indianapolis; >half of corporate agents outside Texas by end of Q1
  • Franchise channel restructuring: during quarter launched 20 new franchise locations across 10 states; 10 agencies exited system; 63 agencies consolidated into larger franchises

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Full-year 2026 guidance reiterated: total revenues expected to grow organically 10%–19%
  • Full-year 2026 guidance reiterated: total written premiums expected to grow organically 12%–20%
  • Guidance framing for H2 2026: improvements in client retention to begin outpacing slower YoY pricing impacts in 2H; management expects faster core revenue growth combining retention gains and continued strong new business
  • Contingent commissions full-year outlook unchanged (60–85 bps of total written premiums); hail/fire/cat risk and further underwriting updates may shift quarterly contingency cadence

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Renewal disintermediation/automation risk: increased digital convenience must not erode renewal profitability; management emphasized renewals involve harder-to-automate back-end service work and a long automation tail
  • Competitive pressure reflected in “demand for outsized compensation” in digital partner channels; management said aggregate commission rates are up YoY but cautioned renewal lift may not be a long-term driver
  • Catastrophe and uncertainty affecting contingent commissions recognition (management cited potential hail/hurricanes/fires as moving parts for contingency revenue cadence)
  • Potential state-mix economics variability: Texas share declined, but management noted each state has different economics (premium per policy vs bind/package rates), which may affect near-term output

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: 2026 PIF acceleration mix + seasonality; Management’s detailed response: Management said PIF acceleration should be renewal retention-driven because most of the book is renewal base, with new business momentum also contributing. They expect Q2 and Q3 to follow normal seasonality (more than Q1 and Q4) for new business generation.
  • Topic: Digital Agent economics, carrier commission rates, and expected revenue contribution; Management’s detailed response: Management confirmed Digital Agent commission economics are largely comparable, but noted carriers increasingly ask for outsized compensation in the digital partner channel. Management stated Digital Agent is not yet a significant revenue driver; contributions are expected to start meaningfully in 2H 2026 via deeper partnership integration.
  • Topic: Renewals disintermediation risk from digital convenience; Management’s detailed response: Management argued renewal-side hurdles are even bigger than new business hurdles, citing the back-end manual labor required to serve and retain clients. They emphasized renewals hold the economics; partial automation without end-to-end service would not sustain long-term profitability.

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the GSHD Q1 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
© 2026 Stock Market Info — Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) Financial Profile