Helen of Troy Limited

Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) Market Cap

Helen of Troy Limited has a market capitalization of $566.1M.

Price: $24.34

-0.69 (-2.76%)

Market Cap: 566.09M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: George Scott Uzzell

Sector: Consumer Defensive

Industry: Household & Personal Products

IPO Date: 1976-07-08

Website: https://www.helenoftroy.com

Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) - Company Information

Market Cap: 566.09M|Sector: Consumer Defensive

Company Profile

Helen of Troy Limited provides various consumer products in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America. The company operates through three segments: Home & Outdoor, Health & Wellness, and Beauty. The Home & Outdoor segment offers food preparation tools and gadgets, storage containers, and organization products; coffee makers, grinders, manual pour overs, and tea kettles; household cleaning products, shower organization, and bathroom accessories; feeding and drinking products, child seating products, cleaning tools, and nursery accessories; insulated water bottles, hydration packs, drinkware, mugs, food containers, lunch containers, insulated totes, soft coolers, and accessories; and technical and outdoor sports packs, travel packs, luggage, daypacks, and everyday packs. The Health & Wellness segment provides thermometers, blood pressure monitors, pulse oximeters, nasal aspirators, and humidifiers; faucet mount water-filtration systems and pitcher-based water filtration systems; and air purifiers, heaters, fans, and humidifiers. The Beauty segment offers grooming brushes, tools, and decorative hair accessories; and shampoos, liquid hair styling, and treatment and conditioning products, as well as hair appliances. The company sells its products through mass merchandisers, drugstore chains, warehouse clubs, home improvement stores, grocery and specialty stores, beauty supply and e-commerce retailers, wholesalers, and various types of distributors, as well as directly to consumers under the OXO, Good Grips, Hydro Flask, Soft Works, OXO tot, OXO Brew, OXO Strive, OXO Outdoor, Osprey, PUR, Honeywell, Braun, Vicks, Drybar, Hot Tools, Revlon, and Bed Head brands. Helen of Troy Limited was incorporated in 1968 and is headquartered in El Paso, Texas.

Analyst Sentiment

48%
Hold

From 4 Active Polls

1Y Forecast: $22.00

▼ -9.6% Potential Upside

Consensus Target Metrics

Low Bound

$22

Median

$22

High Bound

$22

Average

$22

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

🎯 Wall Street Analyst Intelligence Report

1-Year structural target targets, chart projections, and sentiment maps.

Average 1Y Target
$22.00
▼ -9.61% Upside
Low Target
$22.00
-10% Risk
Median Target
$22.00
-10% Mid
High Target
$22.00
-10% Max
Consensus
Hold
3 / 11 Buys

Consensus Trend Projection

Trailing closures vs. 12-month metrics map.

Analyst Vote Distribution

Aggregate institutional coverage sentiment weights.

📊 Historical Valuation Multiples

Real-time Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) momentum side-by-side with discrete quarterly metrics.

Fiscal QuarterTTMQ1 2026Q4 2025Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025Q4 2024Q3 2024Q2 2024
Period EndingTrailing 12MFeb 28, 2026Nov 30, 2025Aug 31, 2025May 31, 2025Feb 28, 2025Nov 30, 2024Aug 31, 2024May 31, 2024
Market Cap ($M)5664064515646171,2601,6771,2272,550
Enterprise Value ($M)1,3811,2211,3701,4741,5062,1982,4111,9573,321
Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E)-0.62-1.83-1.34-0.46-0.346.198.4518.03102.77
Price/Earnings-to-Growth Ratio (PEG)-0.07-0.030.711.31
Price to Sales Ratio (P/S)0.320.860.881.311.662.593.162.596.12
Price to Book Ratio (P/B)0.700.510.530.610.500.751.030.781.65
Price to Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF)3.313.4578.07194.9013.7146.588778.3030.91157.64
Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)2.602.673.414.054.524.544.137.97
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)-4.38-32.79292.93-4.8776.3327.7125.8539.4974.23
Debt to Equity Ratio-2.581.041.111.010.740.570.480.480.51
⚠️

Valuation Model Suspended

API Payload Error: Inverted or negative baseline Free Cash Flow margin detected (-7.0%).

Troubleshooting Notice: The upstream financial data supplier has uploaded corrupted or inverted baseline metrics for HELE. The server sandbox cannot calculate an intrinsic value path from negative cash generation baselines.

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HELEN OF TROY LTD (HELE) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Helen of Troy is a consumer products and consumer health brand owner and operator. The company designs and markets products across consumer health/household wellness categories and everyday home and lifestyle items (including branded drinkware and home goods). The operating model typically relies on third-party manufacturing, with in-house emphasis on product development, brand management, and go-to-market execution. Products flow from sourcing and manufacturing through distribution to major retail channels and e-commerce, supported by merchandising, packaging, and channel-specific programs that sustain shelf presence and reorder behavior in consumable categories.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily driven by branded product sales, with monetisation coming through (1) repeat purchasing in health and wellness-related consumables/accessories and (2) point-in-time purchases in durable categories such as drinkware and home goods. Margin drivers are shaped by brand pricing power, promotional intensity by channel, freight and input costs (metals/resins/packaging), and manufacturing/outsourcing terms. Higher-quality brand positioning and differentiated product design tend to support better gross margins, while scale in procurement and logistics helps stabilize unit economics across product cycles. Working-capital efficiency matters because consumer product demand can shift quickly across seasons and retail inventory cycles.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

HELE’s moat is best characterized as an Intangible Asset + Distribution/Programmatic Advantage combination rather than a technology lock-in. The company’s long-lived brand portfolio, trademarked designs, and category-specific product innovation create real but competitive (rather than absolute) protection. For many SKUs, consumers and retailers build habit and merchandising continuity over time, which can reduce effective “switching” and raise the cost of displacing an established assortment. Retailers also benefit from predictable performance from proven brands, supporting shelf/planogram persistence and promotional planning.

  • Intangible assets (brands, product design, IP/trademarks): strengthens pricing and protects assortment longevity.
  • Channel execution and retailer relationships: improves forecastability of sell-in/sell-through and supports programmatic marketing.
  • Scale in sourcing and logistics: offsets cost inflation and helps maintain competitiveness across cycles.

Competitive benchmarking: In consumer health/OTC-adjacent wellness and personal care, competitors include Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Reckitt, which leverage deep category research, broad distribution, and large OTC/pharma-adjacent portfolios. In drinkware and lifestyle products, competitors include YETI and Stanley, which emphasize premium brand identity and strong distribution momentum.

Compared with these rivals, HELE is more diversified across health/wellness accessories and home/lifestyle categories, which can reduce dependence on a single end market. This diversification also supports internal learning across product development, packaging, and channel strategy, while brand-level leadership varies by category rather than relying on a single flagship franchise.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

  • Assortment expansion and product refresh cycles: durable categories (drinkware/home goods) and wellness accessories both benefit from iterative upgrades, new styles, and retailer-supported seasonal programs.
  • E-commerce and direct-to-consumer channel mix: branded products with clear differentiation can sustain online conversion through content, bundling, and merchandising.
  • Category participation in “wellness at home”: household health routines and personal care demand can provide structural tailwinds versus purely discretionary goods.
  • Operating leverage from stable brand demand: when pricing discipline and promotional cadence hold, gross margin and overhead absorption improve as volumes scale.
  • M&A and brand acquisition discipline: brand portfolios can be supplemented when acquisition targets offer distributable products with identifiable cost and merchandising improvements.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Retail inventory and promotional intensity: consumer cycles can compress sell-through, increasing markdowns and working-capital strain.
  • Input cost volatility: metals, resins, packaging, and freight can pressure gross margins if pricing cannot keep pace.
  • Brand concentration or category underperformance: performance may diverge by brand/category, requiring continuous innovation to maintain relevance.
  • Regulatory and compliance exposure: consumer health-related products can face evolving labeling, claims substantiation, and safety requirements.
  • Manufacturing and supply continuity: reliance on outsourced production heightens risk around quality, lead times, and execution during demand swings.
  • Competitive displacement: premium lifestyle brands and major consumer staples firms can apply significant promotional and distribution resources to defend or expand share.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets often value diversified branded consumer product companies like HELE using EV/EBITDA and earnings-based multiples, with price-to-sales used when near-term earnings visibility is pressured by promotional cycles or input-cost moves. The valuation “needle” typically responds to:

  • Normalized margin profile (gross margin resilience and the ability to manage promotional cadence).
  • Free cash flow conversion (working-capital discipline and capex efficiency).
  • Consistency of demand across seasonal peaks and channel mix.
  • Credible growth strategy tied to measurable assortment expansion and channel execution rather than one-off product spikes.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

HELE’s long-term appeal rests on a diversified portfolio of branded consumer and wellness-related products, supported by intangible assets, assortment stickiness, and channel execution that can sustain earnings power through product cycles. The investment thesis is best viewed as a brand-and-distribution compounder: durable categories with repeat purchase elements can stabilize the model, while continued innovation and operational leverage can support multi-year growth—provided promotional intensity, input costs, and working capital remain managed within tolerances.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

📰 Market News & Coverage

15 Stories Available

Real-time institutional reporting and market updates for HELE.

newsfilecorp.com2026-06-06

ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - HELE

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 6, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

globenewswire.com2026-06-06

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – HELE

NEW YORK, June 06, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 3, 2026.

globenewswire.com2026-06-05

HELE Class Action Notice: Robbins LLP Reminds Investors of the Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Helen of Troy Limited. Class Action Lawsuit

Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) Misled Investors Regarding the Ability of Project Pegasus to Improve Efficiency

newsfilecorp.com2026-06-05

ROSEN, GLOBAL INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - HELE

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

globenewswire.com2026-06-05

HELE INVESTOR ALERT: Class Action Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Helen of Troy Limited Investors – Holzer & Holzer, LLC Encourages Investors With Losses to Contact the Firm

ATLANTA, June 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Helen of Troy Limited (“Helen of Troy”) (NASDAQ: HELE). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts regarding the savings and efficiencies created by Helen of Troy's Project Pegasus.

globenewswire.com2026-06-05

HELE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Helen of Troy Limited Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

LOS ANGELES, June 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Schall Law Firm , a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Helen of Troy Limited (“Helen of Troy” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: HELE) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 3, 2026.

globenewswire.com2026-06-04

ROSEN, A LEADING NATIONAL FIRM, Encourages Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – HELE

NEW YORK, June 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 3, 2026.

gurufocus.com2026-06-04

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

Bronstein, Gewirtz and Grossman LLC Urges Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm PR Ne

feeds.newsfilecorp.com2026-06-04

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 4, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz and Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law

globenewswire.com2026-06-04

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Helen of Troy Limited Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm

New class action for Helen of Troy (HELE) urges investors to seek recovery for alleged securities fraud violations – lead plaintiff deadline of 8/3/2026

gurufocus.com2026-06-03

HELE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Helen of Troy Limited Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

[url="]The Schall Law Firm[/url], a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Helen of Troy Limited (“H

businesswire.com2026-06-03

HELE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Helen of Troy Limited Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $HELE--HELE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Helen of Troy Limited Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm.

prnewswire.com2026-06-03

HELE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Helen of Troy Limited Securities Fraud Lawsuit

NEW YORK, June 3, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

prnewswire.com2026-06-03

HELE Investor Alert: Robbins LLP Reminds Investors of the Class Action Lawsuit Against Helen of Troy Limited

SAN DIEGO, June 3, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) common stock between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025. Helen of Troy markets a variety of consumer goods across several segments.

businesswire.com2026-06-03

Rosen Law Firm Urges Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) Stockholders with Large Losses to Contact the Firm for Information About Their Rights

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Helen of Troy markets a variety of consumer goods across outdoor, beauty, and wellness segments.For more information, submit a form, email attorney Phillip Kim, or give us a call at 866-767-3653.The Allegations: Rosen Law Firm is Inv.

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-02-28

"HELE's Q1 2026 revenue was $470 million, showing a sequential decline from $513 million in Q4 2025 (down 8.4% QoQ) and a year-over-year decrease from $486 million in Q1 2025, reflecting a 3.4% decline YoY. Notably, net income for the most recent quarter was a loss of $55.6 million, which is an improvement relative to a loss of $84.1 million in the previous quarter but a stark decline from a $50.9 million profit in the same quarter last year. The company's profit margins have seen contraction over the period, with escalating net losses turning profits into significant deficits. On the balance sheet, there has been a consistent downward trend in both total assets and equity, indicating weakening financial stability. HELE's market performance is characterized by a substantial 42.81% decline over the past year, with no dividends paid and volatile EPS suggesting concerns about sustainable capital returns. Share buybacks have not been a tool for shareholder value in this context. Analysts' sentiment further reflects this uncertainty with a median price target marginally above the current market price, signaling cautious optimism. Overall, HELE's financial health requires vigilant monitoring given its dwindling asset base and lack of profitability."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Revenue decreased 8.4% QoQ and 3.4% YoY, indicating negative growth trajectory.

Profitability

Neutral

Continued net losses suggest contracting margins and diminished profitability.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Negative net income and no dividends indicate cash flow challenges.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Decline in total assets and equity shows weakening balance sheet strength.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Significant negative price change with no dividends or buybacks.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Caution

Current price below analyst target; sentiment cautious but neutral.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

HELE’s Q4 closed with net sales ahead of outlook and adjusted EPS in line, but profitability deteriorated sharply. Gross margin fell 400 bps to 44.6% and adjusted operating margin declined 710 bps to 8.3%, primarily from higher tariffs, unfavorable inventory obsolescence, and weaker operating leverage alongside elevated brand/trade spending. Management emphasized tangible execution: inventory ended essentially flat YoY at $456m despite $34m incremental tariff costs embedded, and it generated ~$112m of debt paydown in the quarter, aided by near-$50m inventory reductions and a subsequent ~$78m Southaven distribution sale. For FY27, management guided net sales of $1.751b–$1.822b and adjusted EPS of $3.25–$3.75, with a cadence skew—breakeven 1Q and ~15% of full-year EPS in the first half—attributable to tariff cost cycling into COGS and planned people/brand investments. The core debate is whether pricing and tariff mitigation plus dual-sourcing (to ~55% volume) can restore earnings power without overinvesting.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Hydro Flask extended Micro Hydro franchise with two additional sizes and launched new carryout soft coolers and totes; management cited strength in closeout channel from improved inventory composition
  • OXO expanding into adjacent food storage and feeding categories in 2H, with Rapid Brewer continuing to gain recognition (Sprudgie Awards)
  • Osprey augmenting technical pack offerings with new solutions for hiking/backpacking/travel; eCommerce-driven growth and continued adjacency expansion
  • Revlon Versa Styler launched exclusively in Walmart in 1Q, priced below $100, with early demand exceeding expectations
  • Curlsmith launched Curl Fit Reviving Mist as an alternative to traditional dry shampoo
  • Olive & June added new press-ons with hand-painted charms and updated frame colors; management highlighted 18% organic growth in the quarter

Business Development

  • Walmart: Revlon Versa Styler launched exclusively; management cited strong point-of-sale and replenishment dynamics at Walmart
  • Target: management cited strong point-of-sale for Revlon and Braun performance support
  • TikTok Shop and Meta Shop: management plans to advance social commerce execution across platforms
  • U.S. club business: multi-brand partnership development focus (no specific partners named)
  • Supplier diversification / dual sourcing: targeted capability build in regions outside China (no specific suppliers named)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 consolidated sales: -3.3% (favorable to outlook); net sales exceeded expectations with adjusted EPS in line (no numeric EPS beat/shortfall provided)
  • Gross profit margin: -400 bps to 44.6% driven by higher tariffs, less favorable inventory obsolescence, higher retail trade/promotional expense, and less favorable Home & Outdoor mix
  • SG&A ratio: +270 bps driven by unfavorable operating leverage, higher annual incentive compensation, EPA compliance costs, and Olive & June acquisition
  • Adjusted operating margin: -710 bps to 8.3% due to net tariff impact, incentive comp, unfavorable operating leverage, and preservation of trade/brand spending
  • Beauty & Wellness Q4: -4.7% with ~2.8 percentage points driven by tariff-related disruption; Home & Outdoor: -1.5% ahead of expectations
  • Tariffs FY impact: $51m gross unmitigated tariffs on gross profit; reduced net operating income impact to < $30m via SKU prioritization, cost reductions, price increases, and supplier diversification
  • Supply chain progress: diversified cost of goods sold subject to China tariffs to ~30% by year-end; capacity to dual-source ~45% of annual volume, expected ~55% by FY 2027
  • Inventory: ended at $456m (largely flat YoY) despite $34m incremental tariff costs in inventory; accelerated turns and cleared slower-moving inventory reduced net inventory ~$50m in Q4
  • Leverage: net leverage 3.87x vs 3.77x at end of Q3 (increase driven by lower trailing twelve-month EBITDA from lower revenue and higher average tariff costs); partially offset by Q4 $112m debt paydown via free cash flow
  • FY 2027 outlook includes full-year adjusted effective tax rate of 25%-27% and assumes no tariff refunds

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Debt: $781m at quarter end; net leverage 3.87x
  • Q4 debt paydown: $112m of debt reduction from free cash flow
  • Southaven, Mississippi distribution facility divestment (post-quarter): proceeds ~$78m used to pay down debt
  • FY 2027 free cash flow target: $85m to $100m
  • FY 2027 capex: $28m to $32m (product innovation and supply chain diversification)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Supply chain/demand planning: operating rigor resulted in essentially flat YoY inventory even while absorbing significantly higher tariffs; tariff mitigation via supplier diversification, SKU streamlining, and pricing actions
  • Balance sheet productivity: accelerated turns of more productive inventory and cleared slower-moving inventory; net reduction almost $50m in Q4
  • Pricing integrity action: temporarily stopped shipments in Beauty & Wellness last quarter to support consistent pricing adoption; resumed shipments in almost all instances
  • Digital/AI and operations modernization: strengthening digital foundation, building baseline in AI, elevating eCommerce presence, upgrading advanced planning systems for supply chain visibility/responsiveness
  • Advanced planning + automation/AI: modernization of marketplace capabilities (catalog/product page management, third-party seller mitigation) and automation/AI-enabled solutions
  • Growth investments: includes an increase in growth investments of approximately 40 bps (management framed as deliberate, high-ROI marketing/innovation)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • FY 2027 net sales: $1.751b to $1.822b (Home & Outdoor: $854m to $882m; Beauty & Wellness: $897m to $940m)
  • FY 2027 adjusted EBITDA: $190m to $197m (implies YoY growth 2.1% to 6.3%)
  • FY 2027 adjusted EPS: $3.25 to $3.75
  • FY 2027 free cash flow: $85m to $100m
  • Cadence: guidance indicates uneven quarterly pattern; at midpoint, first-half YoY sales slightly positive and second-half slightly negative; first-half adjusted EPS expected to include ~15% of full-year adjusted EPS, with breakeven adjusted EPS in 1Q
  • Tariff assumptions: tariffs in place as of April 2026 assumed to remain for balance of year; excludes benefit from potential tariff refunds
  • China exposure: COGS exposed to China tariffs reduced to <20% by end of FY 2027; net operating income impact < $10m for full FY 2027

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Tariff headwinds: higher tariffs impacting both gross margin and inventory/COGS; FY 2026 gross unmitigated tariffs $51m on gross profit and first-half FY 2027 COGS tariff cycle-out assumed to pressure EPS
  • Macro demand softness: softness in discretionary categories, conservative retailer inventory management, and increasingly competitive/promotional landscape
  • Biology/seasonality risk: flu season did not really happen (respiratory/fever rates below average) reducing restocking for wellness products
  • Pricing/regulatory cost pressure: revenue supported by price increases but total pricing does not cover tariff costs and regulatory/packaging costs (management referenced emerging regulatory costs)
  • Cadence risk: guidance assumes lumpy prior-year comparisons and timing of brand/people investments; first-half EPS constrained by ~15% full-year weighted EPS
  • Geopolitical uncertainty: early-stage Iran conflict could affect resin/commodity/fuel prices; management said outlook not adjusted due to recency, but proactively forward-bought and sought freight pricing

Q&A: Analyst Interest

  • Topic: Success criteria for FY27-to-later recovery and whether HELE can return to prior earnings power. Management framed “success” as becoming a better company first: consumer-centered organization, brand health scoreboard (growth/market share), and investments across capabilities (commercial, supply chain agility, global execution) supported by a healthy balance sheet—driving visible FY27 markers toward faster growth.
  • Topic: Guidance confidence and how Iran/conflict-driven commodity/freight impacts are handled within the model. Management said Iran impacts are “too new” to embed; resin/commodity/fuel reacted quickly. They forward-bought materials, locked inbound freight pricing versus spot, and did not up/down guidance—stating modeling difficulty and focusing on minimizing impact.
  • Topic: Pricing baked into FY27 revenue and retailer acceptance after stop-ship actions. Management quantified total revenue impact from price increases at ~$50m YoY for FY27 vs FY26, noting it doesn’t cover tariffs/regulatory packaging costs. They stated ~100% of planned pricing increases were in place with minor exceptions, and delays in FY26 realization were why the effect differed.

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HELE Q4 2026 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📋 Official Regulatory 10-K / 10-Q SEC Filings

Direct authenticated documentation links to audited SEC database reports for HELE.

SEC EDGAR Live Feed
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HELE)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) Financial Profile